SL(2, C)-representation of a knot
$begingroup$
When studying knot theory I often encounter $SL(2, mathbb{C})$-representation of knots (of the knot group) or the $SL(2, mathbb{C})$ character variety of a knot group. But I just don't seem to understand what this is all about and when the special linear group comes into play.
Can anyone recommend me literature that covers the basics to this topic and where to start? Perhaps a nice gentle introduction preferably with examples?
rt.representation-theory gt.geometric-topology knot-theory character-varieties
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When studying knot theory I often encounter $SL(2, mathbb{C})$-representation of knots (of the knot group) or the $SL(2, mathbb{C})$ character variety of a knot group. But I just don't seem to understand what this is all about and when the special linear group comes into play.
Can anyone recommend me literature that covers the basics to this topic and where to start? Perhaps a nice gentle introduction preferably with examples?
rt.representation-theory gt.geometric-topology knot-theory character-varieties
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the theory of hyperbolic structures on knot complements? Thurston's notes is a good place to start, especially Ch 4 library.msri.org/books/gt3m
$endgroup$
– Neal
Feb 12 at 17:02
1
$begingroup$
Thurston's work is a very natural generalization of perhaps the "first" way of studying knots: compute the fundamental group of the knot exterior. But then how do you know your knot is non-trivial? Find a representation to some non-abelian matrix group.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Budney
Feb 14 at 16:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When studying knot theory I often encounter $SL(2, mathbb{C})$-representation of knots (of the knot group) or the $SL(2, mathbb{C})$ character variety of a knot group. But I just don't seem to understand what this is all about and when the special linear group comes into play.
Can anyone recommend me literature that covers the basics to this topic and where to start? Perhaps a nice gentle introduction preferably with examples?
rt.representation-theory gt.geometric-topology knot-theory character-varieties
$endgroup$
When studying knot theory I often encounter $SL(2, mathbb{C})$-representation of knots (of the knot group) or the $SL(2, mathbb{C})$ character variety of a knot group. But I just don't seem to understand what this is all about and when the special linear group comes into play.
Can anyone recommend me literature that covers the basics to this topic and where to start? Perhaps a nice gentle introduction preferably with examples?
rt.representation-theory gt.geometric-topology knot-theory character-varieties
rt.representation-theory gt.geometric-topology knot-theory character-varieties
edited Feb 14 at 13:40
Sean Lawton
4,40922551
4,40922551
asked Feb 12 at 16:43
Jake B.Jake B.
590211
590211
2
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the theory of hyperbolic structures on knot complements? Thurston's notes is a good place to start, especially Ch 4 library.msri.org/books/gt3m
$endgroup$
– Neal
Feb 12 at 17:02
1
$begingroup$
Thurston's work is a very natural generalization of perhaps the "first" way of studying knots: compute the fundamental group of the knot exterior. But then how do you know your knot is non-trivial? Find a representation to some non-abelian matrix group.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Budney
Feb 14 at 16:18
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the theory of hyperbolic structures on knot complements? Thurston's notes is a good place to start, especially Ch 4 library.msri.org/books/gt3m
$endgroup$
– Neal
Feb 12 at 17:02
1
$begingroup$
Thurston's work is a very natural generalization of perhaps the "first" way of studying knots: compute the fundamental group of the knot exterior. But then how do you know your knot is non-trivial? Find a representation to some non-abelian matrix group.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Budney
Feb 14 at 16:18
2
2
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the theory of hyperbolic structures on knot complements? Thurston's notes is a good place to start, especially Ch 4 library.msri.org/books/gt3m
$endgroup$
– Neal
Feb 12 at 17:02
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the theory of hyperbolic structures on knot complements? Thurston's notes is a good place to start, especially Ch 4 library.msri.org/books/gt3m
$endgroup$
– Neal
Feb 12 at 17:02
1
1
$begingroup$
Thurston's work is a very natural generalization of perhaps the "first" way of studying knots: compute the fundamental group of the knot exterior. But then how do you know your knot is non-trivial? Find a representation to some non-abelian matrix group.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Budney
Feb 14 at 16:18
$begingroup$
Thurston's work is a very natural generalization of perhaps the "first" way of studying knots: compute the fundamental group of the knot exterior. But then how do you know your knot is non-trivial? Find a representation to some non-abelian matrix group.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Budney
Feb 14 at 16:18
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$(P)SL(2, mathbb{C})$ is the isometry group of $mathbb{H}^3,$ so $SL(2, mathbb{C})$ representations are the natural generalization of hyperbolic structures on knot complements.There is a vast literature on the subject, but you might want to look at some of the foundational work:
Morgan, John W.; Shalen, Peter B., Valuations, trees, and degenerations of hyperbolic structures. I, Ann. Math. (2) 120, 401-476 (1984). ZBL0583.57005.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The fundamental group of the complement of a knot in $S^3$, called a knot group, is a knot invariant (equivalent knots have the same knot group, but not conversely). To understand knot groups, understanding their representations is important (and the moduli spaces of their representations; that is, their character varieties). Representations into $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$ have a special place among such representations since many (but perhaps not most) of the 3-manifolds that corresponds to knot complements are hyperbolic (and $mathrm{PSL}(2,mathbb{C})$ is the isometry group of real hyperbolic 3-space).
But such representations, and the correspondence to hyperbolic geometry, is really the tip of the iceberg.
Adam Sikora has many papers relating knot theory to $G$-character varieties (not only to $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties; example 1 and example 2). In particular, as a starting point, I recommend:
On Skein Algebras And SL(2,C)-Character Varieties by Józef Przytycki and Adam Sikora.
This paper ties together $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties to Kauffman bracket skein modules, the latter being an important 3-manifold invariant in knot theory (for example, the Jones polynomial can be defined in terms the Kauffman bracket).
Another interesting connection is the A-polynomial, also defined in terms of $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties. See Representation Theory and the A-polynomial of a Knot, by Cooper and Long, for a nice introduction. Also, Culler has made available a census of A-polynomials here.
I would argue that $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties of knot groups are prevalent in the literature for many reasons (including the relation to hyperbolic geometry), but also perhaps because they are tractable examples of moduli spaces of representations (see my recent exposition here, implemented in SnapPy here). I expect that $G$-character varieties of knot groups (these moduli space are themselves knot invariants) are at least as important (for higher rank $G$), but are less studied since they are much more difficult to work with.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a good introduction:
Shalen, Representations of 3-manifold groups. Handbook of geometric topology, 955–1044, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f323075%2fsl2-c-representation-of-a-knot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$(P)SL(2, mathbb{C})$ is the isometry group of $mathbb{H}^3,$ so $SL(2, mathbb{C})$ representations are the natural generalization of hyperbolic structures on knot complements.There is a vast literature on the subject, but you might want to look at some of the foundational work:
Morgan, John W.; Shalen, Peter B., Valuations, trees, and degenerations of hyperbolic structures. I, Ann. Math. (2) 120, 401-476 (1984). ZBL0583.57005.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$(P)SL(2, mathbb{C})$ is the isometry group of $mathbb{H}^3,$ so $SL(2, mathbb{C})$ representations are the natural generalization of hyperbolic structures on knot complements.There is a vast literature on the subject, but you might want to look at some of the foundational work:
Morgan, John W.; Shalen, Peter B., Valuations, trees, and degenerations of hyperbolic structures. I, Ann. Math. (2) 120, 401-476 (1984). ZBL0583.57005.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$(P)SL(2, mathbb{C})$ is the isometry group of $mathbb{H}^3,$ so $SL(2, mathbb{C})$ representations are the natural generalization of hyperbolic structures on knot complements.There is a vast literature on the subject, but you might want to look at some of the foundational work:
Morgan, John W.; Shalen, Peter B., Valuations, trees, and degenerations of hyperbolic structures. I, Ann. Math. (2) 120, 401-476 (1984). ZBL0583.57005.
$endgroup$
$(P)SL(2, mathbb{C})$ is the isometry group of $mathbb{H}^3,$ so $SL(2, mathbb{C})$ representations are the natural generalization of hyperbolic structures on knot complements.There is a vast literature on the subject, but you might want to look at some of the foundational work:
Morgan, John W.; Shalen, Peter B., Valuations, trees, and degenerations of hyperbolic structures. I, Ann. Math. (2) 120, 401-476 (1984). ZBL0583.57005.
answered Feb 12 at 17:01
Igor RivinIgor Rivin
79.8k9113310
79.8k9113310
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The fundamental group of the complement of a knot in $S^3$, called a knot group, is a knot invariant (equivalent knots have the same knot group, but not conversely). To understand knot groups, understanding their representations is important (and the moduli spaces of their representations; that is, their character varieties). Representations into $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$ have a special place among such representations since many (but perhaps not most) of the 3-manifolds that corresponds to knot complements are hyperbolic (and $mathrm{PSL}(2,mathbb{C})$ is the isometry group of real hyperbolic 3-space).
But such representations, and the correspondence to hyperbolic geometry, is really the tip of the iceberg.
Adam Sikora has many papers relating knot theory to $G$-character varieties (not only to $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties; example 1 and example 2). In particular, as a starting point, I recommend:
On Skein Algebras And SL(2,C)-Character Varieties by Józef Przytycki and Adam Sikora.
This paper ties together $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties to Kauffman bracket skein modules, the latter being an important 3-manifold invariant in knot theory (for example, the Jones polynomial can be defined in terms the Kauffman bracket).
Another interesting connection is the A-polynomial, also defined in terms of $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties. See Representation Theory and the A-polynomial of a Knot, by Cooper and Long, for a nice introduction. Also, Culler has made available a census of A-polynomials here.
I would argue that $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties of knot groups are prevalent in the literature for many reasons (including the relation to hyperbolic geometry), but also perhaps because they are tractable examples of moduli spaces of representations (see my recent exposition here, implemented in SnapPy here). I expect that $G$-character varieties of knot groups (these moduli space are themselves knot invariants) are at least as important (for higher rank $G$), but are less studied since they are much more difficult to work with.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The fundamental group of the complement of a knot in $S^3$, called a knot group, is a knot invariant (equivalent knots have the same knot group, but not conversely). To understand knot groups, understanding their representations is important (and the moduli spaces of their representations; that is, their character varieties). Representations into $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$ have a special place among such representations since many (but perhaps not most) of the 3-manifolds that corresponds to knot complements are hyperbolic (and $mathrm{PSL}(2,mathbb{C})$ is the isometry group of real hyperbolic 3-space).
But such representations, and the correspondence to hyperbolic geometry, is really the tip of the iceberg.
Adam Sikora has many papers relating knot theory to $G$-character varieties (not only to $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties; example 1 and example 2). In particular, as a starting point, I recommend:
On Skein Algebras And SL(2,C)-Character Varieties by Józef Przytycki and Adam Sikora.
This paper ties together $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties to Kauffman bracket skein modules, the latter being an important 3-manifold invariant in knot theory (for example, the Jones polynomial can be defined in terms the Kauffman bracket).
Another interesting connection is the A-polynomial, also defined in terms of $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties. See Representation Theory and the A-polynomial of a Knot, by Cooper and Long, for a nice introduction. Also, Culler has made available a census of A-polynomials here.
I would argue that $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties of knot groups are prevalent in the literature for many reasons (including the relation to hyperbolic geometry), but also perhaps because they are tractable examples of moduli spaces of representations (see my recent exposition here, implemented in SnapPy here). I expect that $G$-character varieties of knot groups (these moduli space are themselves knot invariants) are at least as important (for higher rank $G$), but are less studied since they are much more difficult to work with.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The fundamental group of the complement of a knot in $S^3$, called a knot group, is a knot invariant (equivalent knots have the same knot group, but not conversely). To understand knot groups, understanding their representations is important (and the moduli spaces of their representations; that is, their character varieties). Representations into $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$ have a special place among such representations since many (but perhaps not most) of the 3-manifolds that corresponds to knot complements are hyperbolic (and $mathrm{PSL}(2,mathbb{C})$ is the isometry group of real hyperbolic 3-space).
But such representations, and the correspondence to hyperbolic geometry, is really the tip of the iceberg.
Adam Sikora has many papers relating knot theory to $G$-character varieties (not only to $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties; example 1 and example 2). In particular, as a starting point, I recommend:
On Skein Algebras And SL(2,C)-Character Varieties by Józef Przytycki and Adam Sikora.
This paper ties together $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties to Kauffman bracket skein modules, the latter being an important 3-manifold invariant in knot theory (for example, the Jones polynomial can be defined in terms the Kauffman bracket).
Another interesting connection is the A-polynomial, also defined in terms of $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties. See Representation Theory and the A-polynomial of a Knot, by Cooper and Long, for a nice introduction. Also, Culler has made available a census of A-polynomials here.
I would argue that $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties of knot groups are prevalent in the literature for many reasons (including the relation to hyperbolic geometry), but also perhaps because they are tractable examples of moduli spaces of representations (see my recent exposition here, implemented in SnapPy here). I expect that $G$-character varieties of knot groups (these moduli space are themselves knot invariants) are at least as important (for higher rank $G$), but are less studied since they are much more difficult to work with.
$endgroup$
The fundamental group of the complement of a knot in $S^3$, called a knot group, is a knot invariant (equivalent knots have the same knot group, but not conversely). To understand knot groups, understanding their representations is important (and the moduli spaces of their representations; that is, their character varieties). Representations into $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$ have a special place among such representations since many (but perhaps not most) of the 3-manifolds that corresponds to knot complements are hyperbolic (and $mathrm{PSL}(2,mathbb{C})$ is the isometry group of real hyperbolic 3-space).
But such representations, and the correspondence to hyperbolic geometry, is really the tip of the iceberg.
Adam Sikora has many papers relating knot theory to $G$-character varieties (not only to $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties; example 1 and example 2). In particular, as a starting point, I recommend:
On Skein Algebras And SL(2,C)-Character Varieties by Józef Przytycki and Adam Sikora.
This paper ties together $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties to Kauffman bracket skein modules, the latter being an important 3-manifold invariant in knot theory (for example, the Jones polynomial can be defined in terms the Kauffman bracket).
Another interesting connection is the A-polynomial, also defined in terms of $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties. See Representation Theory and the A-polynomial of a Knot, by Cooper and Long, for a nice introduction. Also, Culler has made available a census of A-polynomials here.
I would argue that $mathrm{SL}(2,mathbb{C})$-character varieties of knot groups are prevalent in the literature for many reasons (including the relation to hyperbolic geometry), but also perhaps because they are tractable examples of moduli spaces of representations (see my recent exposition here, implemented in SnapPy here). I expect that $G$-character varieties of knot groups (these moduli space are themselves knot invariants) are at least as important (for higher rank $G$), but are less studied since they are much more difficult to work with.
edited Feb 20 at 23:39
answered Feb 14 at 13:39
Sean LawtonSean Lawton
4,40922551
4,40922551
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a good introduction:
Shalen, Representations of 3-manifold groups. Handbook of geometric topology, 955–1044, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a good introduction:
Shalen, Representations of 3-manifold groups. Handbook of geometric topology, 955–1044, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a good introduction:
Shalen, Representations of 3-manifold groups. Handbook of geometric topology, 955–1044, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002.
$endgroup$
This is a good introduction:
Shalen, Representations of 3-manifold groups. Handbook of geometric topology, 955–1044, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002.
answered Feb 14 at 19:07
Autumn KentAutumn Kent
9,60734574
9,60734574
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f323075%2fsl2-c-representation-of-a-knot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the theory of hyperbolic structures on knot complements? Thurston's notes is a good place to start, especially Ch 4 library.msri.org/books/gt3m
$endgroup$
– Neal
Feb 12 at 17:02
1
$begingroup$
Thurston's work is a very natural generalization of perhaps the "first" way of studying knots: compute the fundamental group of the knot exterior. But then how do you know your knot is non-trivial? Find a representation to some non-abelian matrix group.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Budney
Feb 14 at 16:18