Defining square function in $mathbb N$ with only $+$ and the predicate “is a square”
$begingroup$
I've got some problems with the following:
Let $C(x)$ be the unary predicate "is a square" (so, for example, $C(4)$, $C(9)$ are true). I want to prove that the function $q(x)=x^2$ is definable in $(mathbb{N}, +, C)$, i.e. there is a formula $phi(x,y)$ such that $phi(a,b) leftrightarrow b=a^2$.
I was thinking about something like $C(x) land z=f(x) $, where $f(x)$ is some expression containing only the + and without any form of recursion.
I can't think of anything, because I can find way to write $x^2$ only using multiplication or using $(x-1)^2$, which I cannot write using only $C$ and $+$. Have you got some suggestions?
logic first-order-logic square-numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've got some problems with the following:
Let $C(x)$ be the unary predicate "is a square" (so, for example, $C(4)$, $C(9)$ are true). I want to prove that the function $q(x)=x^2$ is definable in $(mathbb{N}, +, C)$, i.e. there is a formula $phi(x,y)$ such that $phi(a,b) leftrightarrow b=a^2$.
I was thinking about something like $C(x) land z=f(x) $, where $f(x)$ is some expression containing only the + and without any form of recursion.
I can't think of anything, because I can find way to write $x^2$ only using multiplication or using $(x-1)^2$, which I cannot write using only $C$ and $+$. Have you got some suggestions?
logic first-order-logic square-numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've got some problems with the following:
Let $C(x)$ be the unary predicate "is a square" (so, for example, $C(4)$, $C(9)$ are true). I want to prove that the function $q(x)=x^2$ is definable in $(mathbb{N}, +, C)$, i.e. there is a formula $phi(x,y)$ such that $phi(a,b) leftrightarrow b=a^2$.
I was thinking about something like $C(x) land z=f(x) $, where $f(x)$ is some expression containing only the + and without any form of recursion.
I can't think of anything, because I can find way to write $x^2$ only using multiplication or using $(x-1)^2$, which I cannot write using only $C$ and $+$. Have you got some suggestions?
logic first-order-logic square-numbers
$endgroup$
I've got some problems with the following:
Let $C(x)$ be the unary predicate "is a square" (so, for example, $C(4)$, $C(9)$ are true). I want to prove that the function $q(x)=x^2$ is definable in $(mathbb{N}, +, C)$, i.e. there is a formula $phi(x,y)$ such that $phi(a,b) leftrightarrow b=a^2$.
I was thinking about something like $C(x) land z=f(x) $, where $f(x)$ is some expression containing only the + and without any form of recursion.
I can't think of anything, because I can find way to write $x^2$ only using multiplication or using $(x-1)^2$, which I cannot write using only $C$ and $+$. Have you got some suggestions?
logic first-order-logic square-numbers
logic first-order-logic square-numbers
edited Jan 17 at 19:42
Asaf Karagila♦
308k33441775
308k33441775
asked Jan 17 at 19:33
MarcoMMarcoM
204
204
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Addition is more expressive than you might think:
The ordering $<$ on $mathbb{N}$ is definable from $+$: $a<biffexists c(a+c=b)$.
With $<$ in hand, we can talk about "next" - given a number $x$ and a formula $varphi$, the next $y$ after $x$ satisfying $varphi$ is the unique $y$ such that $$varphi(y)wedgeforall z(x<z<yimplies negvarphi(z)).$$
Now, can you see a way to tell whether a square $b$ happens to be the square of a given number $a$, based on comparing $a$ with the distance between $b$ and the next square after $b$?
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Ah, of course ...
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 17 at 19:57
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077414%2fdefining-square-function-in-mathbb-n-with-only-and-the-predicate-is-a-sq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Addition is more expressive than you might think:
The ordering $<$ on $mathbb{N}$ is definable from $+$: $a<biffexists c(a+c=b)$.
With $<$ in hand, we can talk about "next" - given a number $x$ and a formula $varphi$, the next $y$ after $x$ satisfying $varphi$ is the unique $y$ such that $$varphi(y)wedgeforall z(x<z<yimplies negvarphi(z)).$$
Now, can you see a way to tell whether a square $b$ happens to be the square of a given number $a$, based on comparing $a$ with the distance between $b$ and the next square after $b$?
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Ah, of course ...
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 17 at 19:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Addition is more expressive than you might think:
The ordering $<$ on $mathbb{N}$ is definable from $+$: $a<biffexists c(a+c=b)$.
With $<$ in hand, we can talk about "next" - given a number $x$ and a formula $varphi$, the next $y$ after $x$ satisfying $varphi$ is the unique $y$ such that $$varphi(y)wedgeforall z(x<z<yimplies negvarphi(z)).$$
Now, can you see a way to tell whether a square $b$ happens to be the square of a given number $a$, based on comparing $a$ with the distance between $b$ and the next square after $b$?
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Ah, of course ...
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 17 at 19:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Addition is more expressive than you might think:
The ordering $<$ on $mathbb{N}$ is definable from $+$: $a<biffexists c(a+c=b)$.
With $<$ in hand, we can talk about "next" - given a number $x$ and a formula $varphi$, the next $y$ after $x$ satisfying $varphi$ is the unique $y$ such that $$varphi(y)wedgeforall z(x<z<yimplies negvarphi(z)).$$
Now, can you see a way to tell whether a square $b$ happens to be the square of a given number $a$, based on comparing $a$ with the distance between $b$ and the next square after $b$?
$endgroup$
Addition is more expressive than you might think:
The ordering $<$ on $mathbb{N}$ is definable from $+$: $a<biffexists c(a+c=b)$.
With $<$ in hand, we can talk about "next" - given a number $x$ and a formula $varphi$, the next $y$ after $x$ satisfying $varphi$ is the unique $y$ such that $$varphi(y)wedgeforall z(x<z<yimplies negvarphi(z)).$$
Now, can you see a way to tell whether a square $b$ happens to be the square of a given number $a$, based on comparing $a$ with the distance between $b$ and the next square after $b$?
answered Jan 17 at 19:56
Noah SchweberNoah Schweber
129k10152294
129k10152294
1
$begingroup$
Ah, of course ...
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 17 at 19:57
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Ah, of course ...
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 17 at 19:57
1
1
$begingroup$
Ah, of course ...
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 17 at 19:57
$begingroup$
Ah, of course ...
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 17 at 19:57
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077414%2fdefining-square-function-in-mathbb-n-with-only-and-the-predicate-is-a-sq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown