Classification of subalgebras of composition algebras
$begingroup$
Let $F$ be an algebraically closed field. It is known that the only composition algebras over $F$ are $F$ itself, the direct sum $Foplus F$ (also called split-complexes), the algebra of $2times 2$ matrices (or split-quaternions) $M_2(F)$, and Zorn's vector-matrix algebra (or split-octonions) $Zo(F)$. The elements of these four algebras admit a respective description in terms of $2times 2$ matrices or generalized versions of such, namely:
$$begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & bend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & dend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,d) \ (e,f,g) & hend{pmatrix},$$
where $a,b,ldots,h$ are arbitrary elements of $F$, and in the last case we use the modified matrix multiplication described in this article, which is nonassociative.
All four algebras are clearly subalgebras of the biggest one $Zo(F)$, if we identify any $x$ in the upper-right and lower-left corners with the vector $(x,0,0)$. There exist other subalgebras (necessarily not composition), namely the dual numbers $F[varepsilon]$ where $varepsilon^2=0$, the upper triangular $2times 2$ matrices $B_2(F)$ (apparently also called ternions), and the sextonions $Se(F)$. A matrix representation for these subalgebras is respectively
$$begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & cend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,0) \ (d,0,e) & fend{pmatrix}$$
(for the last one see here). There is yet another subalgebra that I found by trial and error, that I guess we could call the "quintonions" $Qui(F)$. A matrix representation is
$$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & eend{pmatrix}.$$
My question is
Is this list exhaustive? Do there exist any other subalgebras of composition algebras (unital, properly containing $F$ as a subalgebra) not isomorphic to the ones already described ($F$, $F[varepsilon]$, $Foplus F$, $B_2(F)$, $M_2(F)$, $Qui(F)$, $Se(F)$, $Zo(F)$)?
(By the way, have these quintonions been described anywhere in the literature?)
abstract-algebra quaternions algebras octonions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $F$ be an algebraically closed field. It is known that the only composition algebras over $F$ are $F$ itself, the direct sum $Foplus F$ (also called split-complexes), the algebra of $2times 2$ matrices (or split-quaternions) $M_2(F)$, and Zorn's vector-matrix algebra (or split-octonions) $Zo(F)$. The elements of these four algebras admit a respective description in terms of $2times 2$ matrices or generalized versions of such, namely:
$$begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & bend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & dend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,d) \ (e,f,g) & hend{pmatrix},$$
where $a,b,ldots,h$ are arbitrary elements of $F$, and in the last case we use the modified matrix multiplication described in this article, which is nonassociative.
All four algebras are clearly subalgebras of the biggest one $Zo(F)$, if we identify any $x$ in the upper-right and lower-left corners with the vector $(x,0,0)$. There exist other subalgebras (necessarily not composition), namely the dual numbers $F[varepsilon]$ where $varepsilon^2=0$, the upper triangular $2times 2$ matrices $B_2(F)$ (apparently also called ternions), and the sextonions $Se(F)$. A matrix representation for these subalgebras is respectively
$$begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & cend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,0) \ (d,0,e) & fend{pmatrix}$$
(for the last one see here). There is yet another subalgebra that I found by trial and error, that I guess we could call the "quintonions" $Qui(F)$. A matrix representation is
$$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & eend{pmatrix}.$$
My question is
Is this list exhaustive? Do there exist any other subalgebras of composition algebras (unital, properly containing $F$ as a subalgebra) not isomorphic to the ones already described ($F$, $F[varepsilon]$, $Foplus F$, $B_2(F)$, $M_2(F)$, $Qui(F)$, $Se(F)$, $Zo(F)$)?
(By the way, have these quintonions been described anywhere in the literature?)
abstract-algebra quaternions algebras octonions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $F$ be an algebraically closed field. It is known that the only composition algebras over $F$ are $F$ itself, the direct sum $Foplus F$ (also called split-complexes), the algebra of $2times 2$ matrices (or split-quaternions) $M_2(F)$, and Zorn's vector-matrix algebra (or split-octonions) $Zo(F)$. The elements of these four algebras admit a respective description in terms of $2times 2$ matrices or generalized versions of such, namely:
$$begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & bend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & dend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,d) \ (e,f,g) & hend{pmatrix},$$
where $a,b,ldots,h$ are arbitrary elements of $F$, and in the last case we use the modified matrix multiplication described in this article, which is nonassociative.
All four algebras are clearly subalgebras of the biggest one $Zo(F)$, if we identify any $x$ in the upper-right and lower-left corners with the vector $(x,0,0)$. There exist other subalgebras (necessarily not composition), namely the dual numbers $F[varepsilon]$ where $varepsilon^2=0$, the upper triangular $2times 2$ matrices $B_2(F)$ (apparently also called ternions), and the sextonions $Se(F)$. A matrix representation for these subalgebras is respectively
$$begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & cend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,0) \ (d,0,e) & fend{pmatrix}$$
(for the last one see here). There is yet another subalgebra that I found by trial and error, that I guess we could call the "quintonions" $Qui(F)$. A matrix representation is
$$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & eend{pmatrix}.$$
My question is
Is this list exhaustive? Do there exist any other subalgebras of composition algebras (unital, properly containing $F$ as a subalgebra) not isomorphic to the ones already described ($F$, $F[varepsilon]$, $Foplus F$, $B_2(F)$, $M_2(F)$, $Qui(F)$, $Se(F)$, $Zo(F)$)?
(By the way, have these quintonions been described anywhere in the literature?)
abstract-algebra quaternions algebras octonions
$endgroup$
Let $F$ be an algebraically closed field. It is known that the only composition algebras over $F$ are $F$ itself, the direct sum $Foplus F$ (also called split-complexes), the algebra of $2times 2$ matrices (or split-quaternions) $M_2(F)$, and Zorn's vector-matrix algebra (or split-octonions) $Zo(F)$. The elements of these four algebras admit a respective description in terms of $2times 2$ matrices or generalized versions of such, namely:
$$begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & bend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & dend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,d) \ (e,f,g) & hend{pmatrix},$$
where $a,b,ldots,h$ are arbitrary elements of $F$, and in the last case we use the modified matrix multiplication described in this article, which is nonassociative.
All four algebras are clearly subalgebras of the biggest one $Zo(F)$, if we identify any $x$ in the upper-right and lower-left corners with the vector $(x,0,0)$. There exist other subalgebras (necessarily not composition), namely the dual numbers $F[varepsilon]$ where $varepsilon^2=0$, the upper triangular $2times 2$ matrices $B_2(F)$ (apparently also called ternions), and the sextonions $Se(F)$. A matrix representation for these subalgebras is respectively
$$begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & cend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,0) \ (d,0,e) & fend{pmatrix}$$
(for the last one see here). There is yet another subalgebra that I found by trial and error, that I guess we could call the "quintonions" $Qui(F)$. A matrix representation is
$$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & eend{pmatrix}.$$
My question is
Is this list exhaustive? Do there exist any other subalgebras of composition algebras (unital, properly containing $F$ as a subalgebra) not isomorphic to the ones already described ($F$, $F[varepsilon]$, $Foplus F$, $B_2(F)$, $M_2(F)$, $Qui(F)$, $Se(F)$, $Zo(F)$)?
(By the way, have these quintonions been described anywhere in the literature?)
abstract-algebra quaternions algebras octonions
abstract-algebra quaternions algebras octonions
asked Jan 17 at 20:07
preguntonpregunton
1,5861232
1,5861232
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I finally found an answer online, I'll post it here in case someone finds it of value. The classification above is incomplete: there exist three more subalgebras of $Zo(F)$. I had missed them because I foolishly thought that all subalgebras of the same dimension were isomorphic.
Subalgebras of the split-octonions over $mathbb{R}$ were classified two years ago in this paper. We can get the corresponding classification over its algebraic closure $mathbb{C}$ by tensoring with it (thus identifying some of the algebras).
Discarding the completely nilpotent ones (since they don't properly contain the base field as required), and if I didn't make any mistake, we recover all algebras described in the question, plus three more. The new ones are (note that although the paper originally deals with $mathbb{R}$, the following constructions are valid over any field):
The three-dimensional "bidual numbers" $F[varepsilon, varepsilon']$ with two orthogonal idempotents $varepsilon^2 = varepsilon'^2 = varepsilonvarepsilon'=0$.
The four-dimensional Grassmann algebra $Lambda(F^2)$.
The "biduals" over $Foplus F$, i.e. $(Foplus F)[varepsilon, varepsilon']$, another four-dimensional algebra.
A matrix representation is given by
$$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & dend{pmatrix}$$
respectively. Interestingly, none of them can be embedded in $M_2(F)$ despite being associative.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077446%2fclassification-of-subalgebras-of-composition-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I finally found an answer online, I'll post it here in case someone finds it of value. The classification above is incomplete: there exist three more subalgebras of $Zo(F)$. I had missed them because I foolishly thought that all subalgebras of the same dimension were isomorphic.
Subalgebras of the split-octonions over $mathbb{R}$ were classified two years ago in this paper. We can get the corresponding classification over its algebraic closure $mathbb{C}$ by tensoring with it (thus identifying some of the algebras).
Discarding the completely nilpotent ones (since they don't properly contain the base field as required), and if I didn't make any mistake, we recover all algebras described in the question, plus three more. The new ones are (note that although the paper originally deals with $mathbb{R}$, the following constructions are valid over any field):
The three-dimensional "bidual numbers" $F[varepsilon, varepsilon']$ with two orthogonal idempotents $varepsilon^2 = varepsilon'^2 = varepsilonvarepsilon'=0$.
The four-dimensional Grassmann algebra $Lambda(F^2)$.
The "biduals" over $Foplus F$, i.e. $(Foplus F)[varepsilon, varepsilon']$, another four-dimensional algebra.
A matrix representation is given by
$$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & dend{pmatrix}$$
respectively. Interestingly, none of them can be embedded in $M_2(F)$ despite being associative.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I finally found an answer online, I'll post it here in case someone finds it of value. The classification above is incomplete: there exist three more subalgebras of $Zo(F)$. I had missed them because I foolishly thought that all subalgebras of the same dimension were isomorphic.
Subalgebras of the split-octonions over $mathbb{R}$ were classified two years ago in this paper. We can get the corresponding classification over its algebraic closure $mathbb{C}$ by tensoring with it (thus identifying some of the algebras).
Discarding the completely nilpotent ones (since they don't properly contain the base field as required), and if I didn't make any mistake, we recover all algebras described in the question, plus three more. The new ones are (note that although the paper originally deals with $mathbb{R}$, the following constructions are valid over any field):
The three-dimensional "bidual numbers" $F[varepsilon, varepsilon']$ with two orthogonal idempotents $varepsilon^2 = varepsilon'^2 = varepsilonvarepsilon'=0$.
The four-dimensional Grassmann algebra $Lambda(F^2)$.
The "biduals" over $Foplus F$, i.e. $(Foplus F)[varepsilon, varepsilon']$, another four-dimensional algebra.
A matrix representation is given by
$$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & dend{pmatrix}$$
respectively. Interestingly, none of them can be embedded in $M_2(F)$ despite being associative.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I finally found an answer online, I'll post it here in case someone finds it of value. The classification above is incomplete: there exist three more subalgebras of $Zo(F)$. I had missed them because I foolishly thought that all subalgebras of the same dimension were isomorphic.
Subalgebras of the split-octonions over $mathbb{R}$ were classified two years ago in this paper. We can get the corresponding classification over its algebraic closure $mathbb{C}$ by tensoring with it (thus identifying some of the algebras).
Discarding the completely nilpotent ones (since they don't properly contain the base field as required), and if I didn't make any mistake, we recover all algebras described in the question, plus three more. The new ones are (note that although the paper originally deals with $mathbb{R}$, the following constructions are valid over any field):
The three-dimensional "bidual numbers" $F[varepsilon, varepsilon']$ with two orthogonal idempotents $varepsilon^2 = varepsilon'^2 = varepsilonvarepsilon'=0$.
The four-dimensional Grassmann algebra $Lambda(F^2)$.
The "biduals" over $Foplus F$, i.e. $(Foplus F)[varepsilon, varepsilon']$, another four-dimensional algebra.
A matrix representation is given by
$$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & dend{pmatrix}$$
respectively. Interestingly, none of them can be embedded in $M_2(F)$ despite being associative.
$endgroup$
I finally found an answer online, I'll post it here in case someone finds it of value. The classification above is incomplete: there exist three more subalgebras of $Zo(F)$. I had missed them because I foolishly thought that all subalgebras of the same dimension were isomorphic.
Subalgebras of the split-octonions over $mathbb{R}$ were classified two years ago in this paper. We can get the corresponding classification over its algebraic closure $mathbb{C}$ by tensoring with it (thus identifying some of the algebras).
Discarding the completely nilpotent ones (since they don't properly contain the base field as required), and if I didn't make any mistake, we recover all algebras described in the question, plus three more. The new ones are (note that although the paper originally deals with $mathbb{R}$, the following constructions are valid over any field):
The three-dimensional "bidual numbers" $F[varepsilon, varepsilon']$ with two orthogonal idempotents $varepsilon^2 = varepsilon'^2 = varepsilonvarepsilon'=0$.
The four-dimensional Grassmann algebra $Lambda(F^2)$.
The "biduals" over $Foplus F$, i.e. $(Foplus F)[varepsilon, varepsilon']$, another four-dimensional algebra.
A matrix representation is given by
$$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & dend{pmatrix}$$
respectively. Interestingly, none of them can be embedded in $M_2(F)$ despite being associative.
answered Mar 16 at 14:13
preguntonpregunton
1,5861232
1,5861232
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077446%2fclassification-of-subalgebras-of-composition-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown