Classification of subalgebras of composition algebras












2












$begingroup$


Let $F$ be an algebraically closed field. It is known that the only composition algebras over $F$ are $F$ itself, the direct sum $Foplus F$ (also called split-complexes), the algebra of $2times 2$ matrices (or split-quaternions) $M_2(F)$, and Zorn's vector-matrix algebra (or split-octonions) $Zo(F)$. The elements of these four algebras admit a respective description in terms of $2times 2$ matrices or generalized versions of such, namely:



$$begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & bend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & dend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,d) \ (e,f,g) & hend{pmatrix},$$



where $a,b,ldots,h$ are arbitrary elements of $F$, and in the last case we use the modified matrix multiplication described in this article, which is nonassociative.



All four algebras are clearly subalgebras of the biggest one $Zo(F)$, if we identify any $x$ in the upper-right and lower-left corners with the vector $(x,0,0)$. There exist other subalgebras (necessarily not composition), namely the dual numbers $F[varepsilon]$ where $varepsilon^2=0$, the upper triangular $2times 2$ matrices $B_2(F)$ (apparently also called ternions), and the sextonions $Se(F)$. A matrix representation for these subalgebras is respectively



$$begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & cend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,0) \ (d,0,e) & fend{pmatrix}$$



(for the last one see here). There is yet another subalgebra that I found by trial and error, that I guess we could call the "quintonions" $Qui(F)$. A matrix representation is



$$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & eend{pmatrix}.$$



My question is




Is this list exhaustive? Do there exist any other subalgebras of composition algebras (unital, properly containing $F$ as a subalgebra) not isomorphic to the ones already described ($F$, $F[varepsilon]$, $Foplus F$, $B_2(F)$, $M_2(F)$, $Qui(F)$, $Se(F)$, $Zo(F)$)?




(By the way, have these quintonions been described anywhere in the literature?)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    Let $F$ be an algebraically closed field. It is known that the only composition algebras over $F$ are $F$ itself, the direct sum $Foplus F$ (also called split-complexes), the algebra of $2times 2$ matrices (or split-quaternions) $M_2(F)$, and Zorn's vector-matrix algebra (or split-octonions) $Zo(F)$. The elements of these four algebras admit a respective description in terms of $2times 2$ matrices or generalized versions of such, namely:



    $$begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & bend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & dend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,d) \ (e,f,g) & hend{pmatrix},$$



    where $a,b,ldots,h$ are arbitrary elements of $F$, and in the last case we use the modified matrix multiplication described in this article, which is nonassociative.



    All four algebras are clearly subalgebras of the biggest one $Zo(F)$, if we identify any $x$ in the upper-right and lower-left corners with the vector $(x,0,0)$. There exist other subalgebras (necessarily not composition), namely the dual numbers $F[varepsilon]$ where $varepsilon^2=0$, the upper triangular $2times 2$ matrices $B_2(F)$ (apparently also called ternions), and the sextonions $Se(F)$. A matrix representation for these subalgebras is respectively



    $$begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & cend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,0) \ (d,0,e) & fend{pmatrix}$$



    (for the last one see here). There is yet another subalgebra that I found by trial and error, that I guess we could call the "quintonions" $Qui(F)$. A matrix representation is



    $$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & eend{pmatrix}.$$



    My question is




    Is this list exhaustive? Do there exist any other subalgebras of composition algebras (unital, properly containing $F$ as a subalgebra) not isomorphic to the ones already described ($F$, $F[varepsilon]$, $Foplus F$, $B_2(F)$, $M_2(F)$, $Qui(F)$, $Se(F)$, $Zo(F)$)?




    (By the way, have these quintonions been described anywhere in the literature?)










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Let $F$ be an algebraically closed field. It is known that the only composition algebras over $F$ are $F$ itself, the direct sum $Foplus F$ (also called split-complexes), the algebra of $2times 2$ matrices (or split-quaternions) $M_2(F)$, and Zorn's vector-matrix algebra (or split-octonions) $Zo(F)$. The elements of these four algebras admit a respective description in terms of $2times 2$ matrices or generalized versions of such, namely:



      $$begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & bend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & dend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,d) \ (e,f,g) & hend{pmatrix},$$



      where $a,b,ldots,h$ are arbitrary elements of $F$, and in the last case we use the modified matrix multiplication described in this article, which is nonassociative.



      All four algebras are clearly subalgebras of the biggest one $Zo(F)$, if we identify any $x$ in the upper-right and lower-left corners with the vector $(x,0,0)$. There exist other subalgebras (necessarily not composition), namely the dual numbers $F[varepsilon]$ where $varepsilon^2=0$, the upper triangular $2times 2$ matrices $B_2(F)$ (apparently also called ternions), and the sextonions $Se(F)$. A matrix representation for these subalgebras is respectively



      $$begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & cend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,0) \ (d,0,e) & fend{pmatrix}$$



      (for the last one see here). There is yet another subalgebra that I found by trial and error, that I guess we could call the "quintonions" $Qui(F)$. A matrix representation is



      $$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & eend{pmatrix}.$$



      My question is




      Is this list exhaustive? Do there exist any other subalgebras of composition algebras (unital, properly containing $F$ as a subalgebra) not isomorphic to the ones already described ($F$, $F[varepsilon]$, $Foplus F$, $B_2(F)$, $M_2(F)$, $Qui(F)$, $Se(F)$, $Zo(F)$)?




      (By the way, have these quintonions been described anywhere in the literature?)










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $F$ be an algebraically closed field. It is known that the only composition algebras over $F$ are $F$ itself, the direct sum $Foplus F$ (also called split-complexes), the algebra of $2times 2$ matrices (or split-quaternions) $M_2(F)$, and Zorn's vector-matrix algebra (or split-octonions) $Zo(F)$. The elements of these four algebras admit a respective description in terms of $2times 2$ matrices or generalized versions of such, namely:



      $$begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \ 0 & bend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & dend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,d) \ (e,f,g) & hend{pmatrix},$$



      where $a,b,ldots,h$ are arbitrary elements of $F$, and in the last case we use the modified matrix multiplication described in this article, which is nonassociative.



      All four algebras are clearly subalgebras of the biggest one $Zo(F)$, if we identify any $x$ in the upper-right and lower-left corners with the vector $(x,0,0)$. There exist other subalgebras (necessarily not composition), namely the dual numbers $F[varepsilon]$ where $varepsilon^2=0$, the upper triangular $2times 2$ matrices $B_2(F)$ (apparently also called ternions), and the sextonions $Se(F)$. A matrix representation for these subalgebras is respectively



      $$begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & b \ 0 & cend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,c,0) \ (d,0,e) & fend{pmatrix}$$



      (for the last one see here). There is yet another subalgebra that I found by trial and error, that I guess we could call the "quintonions" $Qui(F)$. A matrix representation is



      $$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & eend{pmatrix}.$$



      My question is




      Is this list exhaustive? Do there exist any other subalgebras of composition algebras (unital, properly containing $F$ as a subalgebra) not isomorphic to the ones already described ($F$, $F[varepsilon]$, $Foplus F$, $B_2(F)$, $M_2(F)$, $Qui(F)$, $Se(F)$, $Zo(F)$)?




      (By the way, have these quintonions been described anywhere in the literature?)







      abstract-algebra quaternions algebras octonions






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 17 at 20:07









      preguntonpregunton

      1,5861232




      1,5861232






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          I finally found an answer online, I'll post it here in case someone finds it of value. The classification above is incomplete: there exist three more subalgebras of $Zo(F)$. I had missed them because I foolishly thought that all subalgebras of the same dimension were isomorphic.



          Subalgebras of the split-octonions over $mathbb{R}$ were classified two years ago in this paper. We can get the corresponding classification over its algebraic closure $mathbb{C}$ by tensoring with it (thus identifying some of the algebras).



          Discarding the completely nilpotent ones (since they don't properly contain the base field as required), and if I didn't make any mistake, we recover all algebras described in the question, plus three more. The new ones are (note that although the paper originally deals with $mathbb{R}$, the following constructions are valid over any field):




          • The three-dimensional "bidual numbers" $F[varepsilon, varepsilon']$ with two orthogonal idempotents $varepsilon^2 = varepsilon'^2 = varepsilonvarepsilon'=0$.


          • The four-dimensional Grassmann algebra $Lambda(F^2)$.


          • The "biduals" over $Foplus F$, i.e. $(Foplus F)[varepsilon, varepsilon']$, another four-dimensional algebra.



          A matrix representation is given by



          $$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & dend{pmatrix}$$



          respectively. Interestingly, none of them can be embedded in $M_2(F)$ despite being associative.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077446%2fclassification-of-subalgebras-of-composition-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            I finally found an answer online, I'll post it here in case someone finds it of value. The classification above is incomplete: there exist three more subalgebras of $Zo(F)$. I had missed them because I foolishly thought that all subalgebras of the same dimension were isomorphic.



            Subalgebras of the split-octonions over $mathbb{R}$ were classified two years ago in this paper. We can get the corresponding classification over its algebraic closure $mathbb{C}$ by tensoring with it (thus identifying some of the algebras).



            Discarding the completely nilpotent ones (since they don't properly contain the base field as required), and if I didn't make any mistake, we recover all algebras described in the question, plus three more. The new ones are (note that although the paper originally deals with $mathbb{R}$, the following constructions are valid over any field):




            • The three-dimensional "bidual numbers" $F[varepsilon, varepsilon']$ with two orthogonal idempotents $varepsilon^2 = varepsilon'^2 = varepsilonvarepsilon'=0$.


            • The four-dimensional Grassmann algebra $Lambda(F^2)$.


            • The "biduals" over $Foplus F$, i.e. $(Foplus F)[varepsilon, varepsilon']$, another four-dimensional algebra.



            A matrix representation is given by



            $$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & dend{pmatrix}$$



            respectively. Interestingly, none of them can be embedded in $M_2(F)$ despite being associative.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              I finally found an answer online, I'll post it here in case someone finds it of value. The classification above is incomplete: there exist three more subalgebras of $Zo(F)$. I had missed them because I foolishly thought that all subalgebras of the same dimension were isomorphic.



              Subalgebras of the split-octonions over $mathbb{R}$ were classified two years ago in this paper. We can get the corresponding classification over its algebraic closure $mathbb{C}$ by tensoring with it (thus identifying some of the algebras).



              Discarding the completely nilpotent ones (since they don't properly contain the base field as required), and if I didn't make any mistake, we recover all algebras described in the question, plus three more. The new ones are (note that although the paper originally deals with $mathbb{R}$, the following constructions are valid over any field):




              • The three-dimensional "bidual numbers" $F[varepsilon, varepsilon']$ with two orthogonal idempotents $varepsilon^2 = varepsilon'^2 = varepsilonvarepsilon'=0$.


              • The four-dimensional Grassmann algebra $Lambda(F^2)$.


              • The "biduals" over $Foplus F$, i.e. $(Foplus F)[varepsilon, varepsilon']$, another four-dimensional algebra.



              A matrix representation is given by



              $$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & dend{pmatrix}$$



              respectively. Interestingly, none of them can be embedded in $M_2(F)$ despite being associative.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                I finally found an answer online, I'll post it here in case someone finds it of value. The classification above is incomplete: there exist three more subalgebras of $Zo(F)$. I had missed them because I foolishly thought that all subalgebras of the same dimension were isomorphic.



                Subalgebras of the split-octonions over $mathbb{R}$ were classified two years ago in this paper. We can get the corresponding classification over its algebraic closure $mathbb{C}$ by tensoring with it (thus identifying some of the algebras).



                Discarding the completely nilpotent ones (since they don't properly contain the base field as required), and if I didn't make any mistake, we recover all algebras described in the question, plus three more. The new ones are (note that although the paper originally deals with $mathbb{R}$, the following constructions are valid over any field):




                • The three-dimensional "bidual numbers" $F[varepsilon, varepsilon']$ with two orthogonal idempotents $varepsilon^2 = varepsilon'^2 = varepsilonvarepsilon'=0$.


                • The four-dimensional Grassmann algebra $Lambda(F^2)$.


                • The "biduals" over $Foplus F$, i.e. $(Foplus F)[varepsilon, varepsilon']$, another four-dimensional algebra.



                A matrix representation is given by



                $$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & dend{pmatrix}$$



                respectively. Interestingly, none of them can be embedded in $M_2(F)$ despite being associative.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I finally found an answer online, I'll post it here in case someone finds it of value. The classification above is incomplete: there exist three more subalgebras of $Zo(F)$. I had missed them because I foolishly thought that all subalgebras of the same dimension were isomorphic.



                Subalgebras of the split-octonions over $mathbb{R}$ were classified two years ago in this paper. We can get the corresponding classification over its algebraic closure $mathbb{C}$ by tensoring with it (thus identifying some of the algebras).



                Discarding the completely nilpotent ones (since they don't properly contain the base field as required), and if I didn't make any mistake, we recover all algebras described in the question, plus three more. The new ones are (note that although the paper originally deals with $mathbb{R}$, the following constructions are valid over any field):




                • The three-dimensional "bidual numbers" $F[varepsilon, varepsilon']$ with two orthogonal idempotents $varepsilon^2 = varepsilon'^2 = varepsilonvarepsilon'=0$.


                • The four-dimensional Grassmann algebra $Lambda(F^2)$.


                • The "biduals" over $Foplus F$, i.e. $(Foplus F)[varepsilon, varepsilon']$, another four-dimensional algebra.



                A matrix representation is given by



                $$begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,d) & aend{pmatrix}, begin{pmatrix} a & (b,0,0) \ (0,c,0) & dend{pmatrix}$$



                respectively. Interestingly, none of them can be embedded in $M_2(F)$ despite being associative.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 16 at 14:13









                preguntonpregunton

                1,5861232




                1,5861232






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077446%2fclassification-of-subalgebras-of-composition-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Human spaceflight

                    Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                    張江高科駅