How to load recordTypes using dataLoader based on their names and Not their Ids?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I am trying to load some (FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c) data using dataLaoder.
This data should be imported to many environments (sandboxes and scratch orgs).
Given that the RecordType ID is not the same in the various sandboxes and sratch orgs, i want to use the RecordType name instead of the ID as it's consistent across all environments.
Here is an example of a record that i am trying to import:
FinServ__CreateInverseRole__c, Name, FinServ__InverseRole__c, RecordType.Name
"FALSE", "TEST", "INVERSE TEST", "Contact Role"
No data was imported and i a got this error message:
RecordType ID: id value of incorrect type: Contact Role
Note: I've already checked the accessibility of the record types in my profile.
Did any one encounter this kind of issue by any chance ? thanks for your help.
data-loader record-type
|
show 3 more comments
I am trying to load some (FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c) data using dataLaoder.
This data should be imported to many environments (sandboxes and scratch orgs).
Given that the RecordType ID is not the same in the various sandboxes and sratch orgs, i want to use the RecordType name instead of the ID as it's consistent across all environments.
Here is an example of a record that i am trying to import:
FinServ__CreateInverseRole__c, Name, FinServ__InverseRole__c, RecordType.Name
"FALSE", "TEST", "INVERSE TEST", "Contact Role"
No data was imported and i a got this error message:
RecordType ID: id value of incorrect type: Contact Role
Note: I've already checked the accessibility of the record types in my profile.
Did any one encounter this kind of issue by any chance ? thanks for your help.
data-loader record-type
Did you enable Bulk API mode?
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 16:16
@sfdcfox No, i did not enable Bulk API
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 12 at 16:18
Try using the Bulk API mode in settings...
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 16:36
with the same file ? ,i mean with this "RecordType.Name" as a header ?
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 12 at 16:38
Yes, the Bulk API mode should support that syntax.
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 17:12
|
show 3 more comments
I am trying to load some (FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c) data using dataLaoder.
This data should be imported to many environments (sandboxes and scratch orgs).
Given that the RecordType ID is not the same in the various sandboxes and sratch orgs, i want to use the RecordType name instead of the ID as it's consistent across all environments.
Here is an example of a record that i am trying to import:
FinServ__CreateInverseRole__c, Name, FinServ__InverseRole__c, RecordType.Name
"FALSE", "TEST", "INVERSE TEST", "Contact Role"
No data was imported and i a got this error message:
RecordType ID: id value of incorrect type: Contact Role
Note: I've already checked the accessibility of the record types in my profile.
Did any one encounter this kind of issue by any chance ? thanks for your help.
data-loader record-type
I am trying to load some (FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c) data using dataLaoder.
This data should be imported to many environments (sandboxes and scratch orgs).
Given that the RecordType ID is not the same in the various sandboxes and sratch orgs, i want to use the RecordType name instead of the ID as it's consistent across all environments.
Here is an example of a record that i am trying to import:
FinServ__CreateInverseRole__c, Name, FinServ__InverseRole__c, RecordType.Name
"FALSE", "TEST", "INVERSE TEST", "Contact Role"
No data was imported and i a got this error message:
RecordType ID: id value of incorrect type: Contact Role
Note: I've already checked the accessibility of the record types in my profile.
Did any one encounter this kind of issue by any chance ? thanks for your help.
data-loader record-type
data-loader record-type
edited Feb 12 at 15:01
Jayant Das
18.4k21330
18.4k21330
asked Feb 12 at 14:49
Merabti IbrahimMerabti Ibrahim
386417
386417
Did you enable Bulk API mode?
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 16:16
@sfdcfox No, i did not enable Bulk API
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 12 at 16:18
Try using the Bulk API mode in settings...
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 16:36
with the same file ? ,i mean with this "RecordType.Name" as a header ?
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 12 at 16:38
Yes, the Bulk API mode should support that syntax.
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 17:12
|
show 3 more comments
Did you enable Bulk API mode?
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 16:16
@sfdcfox No, i did not enable Bulk API
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 12 at 16:18
Try using the Bulk API mode in settings...
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 16:36
with the same file ? ,i mean with this "RecordType.Name" as a header ?
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 12 at 16:38
Yes, the Bulk API mode should support that syntax.
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 17:12
Did you enable Bulk API mode?
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 16:16
Did you enable Bulk API mode?
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 16:16
@sfdcfox No, i did not enable Bulk API
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 12 at 16:18
@sfdcfox No, i did not enable Bulk API
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 12 at 16:18
Try using the Bulk API mode in settings...
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 16:36
Try using the Bulk API mode in settings...
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 16:36
with the same file ? ,i mean with this "RecordType.Name" as a header ?
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 12 at 16:38
with the same file ? ,i mean with this "RecordType.Name" as a header ?
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 12 at 16:38
Yes, the Bulk API mode should support that syntax.
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 17:12
Yes, the Bulk API mode should support that syntax.
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 17:12
|
show 3 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
FRAME CHALLENGE
For one-time imports from a CLI to use in multiple orgs (including scratch orgs), you should be using sfdx. This allows you to write a shell script/batch file that allows you to make a portable upload:
sfdx force:data:bulk:upsert -s FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c -f file/to/import.csv -i Id -w 10
Using the Bulk API allows you to specify references, as outlined in Relationship Fields in a Header Row.
The Data Loader is not purpose-built for migrating data between orgs (thus manual mapping in Excel/external apps is often required), so it lacks many of the features that are found in SFDX and newer tools.
Yep, this works. Didn't think it this way. But I will still think as long as its a data load activity, and that you need to utilize say data loader, still stick withRecordTypeId
to reduce any complexity.
– Jayant Das
Feb 12 at 18:39
I keep getting this error message "DUPLICATE_EXTERNAL_ID:Name: more than one record found for external id field" when i try to execute the command line above. i have no data in my scratch so, it's kind of strange to have this error. I noticed though that when get rid of "RecordType.Name" column , it works and this errors disappears. SO, if this worked for you ,i must have missed something
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 13 at 13:55
1
@MerabtiIbrahim Name needs to be unique. For example, if you have two record types named "Household" on two separate objects, this could cause this error. You'll need to have unique record type names for this to work.
– sfdcfox
Feb 13 at 14:17
@sfdcfox,so you want to say that there is another record type with the same name on another object ?
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 13 at 14:21
1
@MerabtiIbrahim That's the usual case, yes. I don't know why it does this, but that's how it behaves.
– sfdcfox
Feb 13 at 14:28
|
show 1 more comment
I know one way you can use. You have to use a custom field and a trigger.
- Create a text field on
FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c
named asRecordTypeTemp__c
Write a before insert trigger on
FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c
to mapRecordTypeTemp__c
into RecordType Id
Trigger ReciprocalRoleTrigger on FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c (before insert){
Map<String , Schema.RecordTypeInfo> reciprocalNameRecordTypeMap = FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c.SObjectType.getDescribe().recordTypeInfosByDeveloperName;
for(FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c ind : Trigger.new){
ind.RecordTypeId = reciprocalNameRecordTypeMap.get(ind.RecordTypeTemp__c).recordTypeId;
}
}
Now when you load data, dont populate recordTypeId field just populate RecordTypeTemp__c
with the developer name to make a consistent behaviour in dataload accross all orgs
1
This will definitely work, but personally I wouldn't recommend building any customization to address a data loading activity.
– Jayant Das
Feb 12 at 15:52
1
@JayantDas I second that.4
– Pranay Jaiswal
Feb 12 at 15:53
add a comment |
You cannot use Record Type Name in data loader to map to a particular record type. You will need to use RecordTypeId
for this purpose.
As a reference, it is mentioned in this knowledge article:
Changing record types for multiple records via the dataloader is not as straight forward as it would seem. Instead of using the record type name, usage of the record type ID gathered via the URL is required.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f250018%2fhow-to-load-recordtypes-using-dataloader-based-on-their-names-and-not-their-ids%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
FRAME CHALLENGE
For one-time imports from a CLI to use in multiple orgs (including scratch orgs), you should be using sfdx. This allows you to write a shell script/batch file that allows you to make a portable upload:
sfdx force:data:bulk:upsert -s FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c -f file/to/import.csv -i Id -w 10
Using the Bulk API allows you to specify references, as outlined in Relationship Fields in a Header Row.
The Data Loader is not purpose-built for migrating data between orgs (thus manual mapping in Excel/external apps is often required), so it lacks many of the features that are found in SFDX and newer tools.
Yep, this works. Didn't think it this way. But I will still think as long as its a data load activity, and that you need to utilize say data loader, still stick withRecordTypeId
to reduce any complexity.
– Jayant Das
Feb 12 at 18:39
I keep getting this error message "DUPLICATE_EXTERNAL_ID:Name: more than one record found for external id field" when i try to execute the command line above. i have no data in my scratch so, it's kind of strange to have this error. I noticed though that when get rid of "RecordType.Name" column , it works and this errors disappears. SO, if this worked for you ,i must have missed something
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 13 at 13:55
1
@MerabtiIbrahim Name needs to be unique. For example, if you have two record types named "Household" on two separate objects, this could cause this error. You'll need to have unique record type names for this to work.
– sfdcfox
Feb 13 at 14:17
@sfdcfox,so you want to say that there is another record type with the same name on another object ?
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 13 at 14:21
1
@MerabtiIbrahim That's the usual case, yes. I don't know why it does this, but that's how it behaves.
– sfdcfox
Feb 13 at 14:28
|
show 1 more comment
FRAME CHALLENGE
For one-time imports from a CLI to use in multiple orgs (including scratch orgs), you should be using sfdx. This allows you to write a shell script/batch file that allows you to make a portable upload:
sfdx force:data:bulk:upsert -s FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c -f file/to/import.csv -i Id -w 10
Using the Bulk API allows you to specify references, as outlined in Relationship Fields in a Header Row.
The Data Loader is not purpose-built for migrating data between orgs (thus manual mapping in Excel/external apps is often required), so it lacks many of the features that are found in SFDX and newer tools.
Yep, this works. Didn't think it this way. But I will still think as long as its a data load activity, and that you need to utilize say data loader, still stick withRecordTypeId
to reduce any complexity.
– Jayant Das
Feb 12 at 18:39
I keep getting this error message "DUPLICATE_EXTERNAL_ID:Name: more than one record found for external id field" when i try to execute the command line above. i have no data in my scratch so, it's kind of strange to have this error. I noticed though that when get rid of "RecordType.Name" column , it works and this errors disappears. SO, if this worked for you ,i must have missed something
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 13 at 13:55
1
@MerabtiIbrahim Name needs to be unique. For example, if you have two record types named "Household" on two separate objects, this could cause this error. You'll need to have unique record type names for this to work.
– sfdcfox
Feb 13 at 14:17
@sfdcfox,so you want to say that there is another record type with the same name on another object ?
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 13 at 14:21
1
@MerabtiIbrahim That's the usual case, yes. I don't know why it does this, but that's how it behaves.
– sfdcfox
Feb 13 at 14:28
|
show 1 more comment
FRAME CHALLENGE
For one-time imports from a CLI to use in multiple orgs (including scratch orgs), you should be using sfdx. This allows you to write a shell script/batch file that allows you to make a portable upload:
sfdx force:data:bulk:upsert -s FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c -f file/to/import.csv -i Id -w 10
Using the Bulk API allows you to specify references, as outlined in Relationship Fields in a Header Row.
The Data Loader is not purpose-built for migrating data between orgs (thus manual mapping in Excel/external apps is often required), so it lacks many of the features that are found in SFDX and newer tools.
FRAME CHALLENGE
For one-time imports from a CLI to use in multiple orgs (including scratch orgs), you should be using sfdx. This allows you to write a shell script/batch file that allows you to make a portable upload:
sfdx force:data:bulk:upsert -s FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c -f file/to/import.csv -i Id -w 10
Using the Bulk API allows you to specify references, as outlined in Relationship Fields in a Header Row.
The Data Loader is not purpose-built for migrating data between orgs (thus manual mapping in Excel/external apps is often required), so it lacks many of the features that are found in SFDX and newer tools.
answered Feb 12 at 18:22
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
265k13212459
265k13212459
Yep, this works. Didn't think it this way. But I will still think as long as its a data load activity, and that you need to utilize say data loader, still stick withRecordTypeId
to reduce any complexity.
– Jayant Das
Feb 12 at 18:39
I keep getting this error message "DUPLICATE_EXTERNAL_ID:Name: more than one record found for external id field" when i try to execute the command line above. i have no data in my scratch so, it's kind of strange to have this error. I noticed though that when get rid of "RecordType.Name" column , it works and this errors disappears. SO, if this worked for you ,i must have missed something
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 13 at 13:55
1
@MerabtiIbrahim Name needs to be unique. For example, if you have two record types named "Household" on two separate objects, this could cause this error. You'll need to have unique record type names for this to work.
– sfdcfox
Feb 13 at 14:17
@sfdcfox,so you want to say that there is another record type with the same name on another object ?
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 13 at 14:21
1
@MerabtiIbrahim That's the usual case, yes. I don't know why it does this, but that's how it behaves.
– sfdcfox
Feb 13 at 14:28
|
show 1 more comment
Yep, this works. Didn't think it this way. But I will still think as long as its a data load activity, and that you need to utilize say data loader, still stick withRecordTypeId
to reduce any complexity.
– Jayant Das
Feb 12 at 18:39
I keep getting this error message "DUPLICATE_EXTERNAL_ID:Name: more than one record found for external id field" when i try to execute the command line above. i have no data in my scratch so, it's kind of strange to have this error. I noticed though that when get rid of "RecordType.Name" column , it works and this errors disappears. SO, if this worked for you ,i must have missed something
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 13 at 13:55
1
@MerabtiIbrahim Name needs to be unique. For example, if you have two record types named "Household" on two separate objects, this could cause this error. You'll need to have unique record type names for this to work.
– sfdcfox
Feb 13 at 14:17
@sfdcfox,so you want to say that there is another record type with the same name on another object ?
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 13 at 14:21
1
@MerabtiIbrahim That's the usual case, yes. I don't know why it does this, but that's how it behaves.
– sfdcfox
Feb 13 at 14:28
Yep, this works. Didn't think it this way. But I will still think as long as its a data load activity, and that you need to utilize say data loader, still stick with
RecordTypeId
to reduce any complexity.– Jayant Das
Feb 12 at 18:39
Yep, this works. Didn't think it this way. But I will still think as long as its a data load activity, and that you need to utilize say data loader, still stick with
RecordTypeId
to reduce any complexity.– Jayant Das
Feb 12 at 18:39
I keep getting this error message "DUPLICATE_EXTERNAL_ID:Name: more than one record found for external id field" when i try to execute the command line above. i have no data in my scratch so, it's kind of strange to have this error. I noticed though that when get rid of "RecordType.Name" column , it works and this errors disappears. SO, if this worked for you ,i must have missed something
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 13 at 13:55
I keep getting this error message "DUPLICATE_EXTERNAL_ID:Name: more than one record found for external id field" when i try to execute the command line above. i have no data in my scratch so, it's kind of strange to have this error. I noticed though that when get rid of "RecordType.Name" column , it works and this errors disappears. SO, if this worked for you ,i must have missed something
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 13 at 13:55
1
1
@MerabtiIbrahim Name needs to be unique. For example, if you have two record types named "Household" on two separate objects, this could cause this error. You'll need to have unique record type names for this to work.
– sfdcfox
Feb 13 at 14:17
@MerabtiIbrahim Name needs to be unique. For example, if you have two record types named "Household" on two separate objects, this could cause this error. You'll need to have unique record type names for this to work.
– sfdcfox
Feb 13 at 14:17
@sfdcfox,so you want to say that there is another record type with the same name on another object ?
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 13 at 14:21
@sfdcfox,so you want to say that there is another record type with the same name on another object ?
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 13 at 14:21
1
1
@MerabtiIbrahim That's the usual case, yes. I don't know why it does this, but that's how it behaves.
– sfdcfox
Feb 13 at 14:28
@MerabtiIbrahim That's the usual case, yes. I don't know why it does this, but that's how it behaves.
– sfdcfox
Feb 13 at 14:28
|
show 1 more comment
I know one way you can use. You have to use a custom field and a trigger.
- Create a text field on
FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c
named asRecordTypeTemp__c
Write a before insert trigger on
FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c
to mapRecordTypeTemp__c
into RecordType Id
Trigger ReciprocalRoleTrigger on FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c (before insert){
Map<String , Schema.RecordTypeInfo> reciprocalNameRecordTypeMap = FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c.SObjectType.getDescribe().recordTypeInfosByDeveloperName;
for(FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c ind : Trigger.new){
ind.RecordTypeId = reciprocalNameRecordTypeMap.get(ind.RecordTypeTemp__c).recordTypeId;
}
}
Now when you load data, dont populate recordTypeId field just populate RecordTypeTemp__c
with the developer name to make a consistent behaviour in dataload accross all orgs
1
This will definitely work, but personally I wouldn't recommend building any customization to address a data loading activity.
– Jayant Das
Feb 12 at 15:52
1
@JayantDas I second that.4
– Pranay Jaiswal
Feb 12 at 15:53
add a comment |
I know one way you can use. You have to use a custom field and a trigger.
- Create a text field on
FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c
named asRecordTypeTemp__c
Write a before insert trigger on
FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c
to mapRecordTypeTemp__c
into RecordType Id
Trigger ReciprocalRoleTrigger on FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c (before insert){
Map<String , Schema.RecordTypeInfo> reciprocalNameRecordTypeMap = FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c.SObjectType.getDescribe().recordTypeInfosByDeveloperName;
for(FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c ind : Trigger.new){
ind.RecordTypeId = reciprocalNameRecordTypeMap.get(ind.RecordTypeTemp__c).recordTypeId;
}
}
Now when you load data, dont populate recordTypeId field just populate RecordTypeTemp__c
with the developer name to make a consistent behaviour in dataload accross all orgs
1
This will definitely work, but personally I wouldn't recommend building any customization to address a data loading activity.
– Jayant Das
Feb 12 at 15:52
1
@JayantDas I second that.4
– Pranay Jaiswal
Feb 12 at 15:53
add a comment |
I know one way you can use. You have to use a custom field and a trigger.
- Create a text field on
FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c
named asRecordTypeTemp__c
Write a before insert trigger on
FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c
to mapRecordTypeTemp__c
into RecordType Id
Trigger ReciprocalRoleTrigger on FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c (before insert){
Map<String , Schema.RecordTypeInfo> reciprocalNameRecordTypeMap = FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c.SObjectType.getDescribe().recordTypeInfosByDeveloperName;
for(FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c ind : Trigger.new){
ind.RecordTypeId = reciprocalNameRecordTypeMap.get(ind.RecordTypeTemp__c).recordTypeId;
}
}
Now when you load data, dont populate recordTypeId field just populate RecordTypeTemp__c
with the developer name to make a consistent behaviour in dataload accross all orgs
I know one way you can use. You have to use a custom field and a trigger.
- Create a text field on
FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c
named asRecordTypeTemp__c
Write a before insert trigger on
FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c
to mapRecordTypeTemp__c
into RecordType Id
Trigger ReciprocalRoleTrigger on FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c (before insert){
Map<String , Schema.RecordTypeInfo> reciprocalNameRecordTypeMap = FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c.SObjectType.getDescribe().recordTypeInfosByDeveloperName;
for(FinServ__ReciprocalRole__c ind : Trigger.new){
ind.RecordTypeId = reciprocalNameRecordTypeMap.get(ind.RecordTypeTemp__c).recordTypeId;
}
}
Now when you load data, dont populate recordTypeId field just populate RecordTypeTemp__c
with the developer name to make a consistent behaviour in dataload accross all orgs
answered Feb 12 at 15:15
Pranay JaiswalPranay Jaiswal
18.7k53158
18.7k53158
1
This will definitely work, but personally I wouldn't recommend building any customization to address a data loading activity.
– Jayant Das
Feb 12 at 15:52
1
@JayantDas I second that.4
– Pranay Jaiswal
Feb 12 at 15:53
add a comment |
1
This will definitely work, but personally I wouldn't recommend building any customization to address a data loading activity.
– Jayant Das
Feb 12 at 15:52
1
@JayantDas I second that.4
– Pranay Jaiswal
Feb 12 at 15:53
1
1
This will definitely work, but personally I wouldn't recommend building any customization to address a data loading activity.
– Jayant Das
Feb 12 at 15:52
This will definitely work, but personally I wouldn't recommend building any customization to address a data loading activity.
– Jayant Das
Feb 12 at 15:52
1
1
@JayantDas I second that.4
– Pranay Jaiswal
Feb 12 at 15:53
@JayantDas I second that.4
– Pranay Jaiswal
Feb 12 at 15:53
add a comment |
You cannot use Record Type Name in data loader to map to a particular record type. You will need to use RecordTypeId
for this purpose.
As a reference, it is mentioned in this knowledge article:
Changing record types for multiple records via the dataloader is not as straight forward as it would seem. Instead of using the record type name, usage of the record type ID gathered via the URL is required.
add a comment |
You cannot use Record Type Name in data loader to map to a particular record type. You will need to use RecordTypeId
for this purpose.
As a reference, it is mentioned in this knowledge article:
Changing record types for multiple records via the dataloader is not as straight forward as it would seem. Instead of using the record type name, usage of the record type ID gathered via the URL is required.
add a comment |
You cannot use Record Type Name in data loader to map to a particular record type. You will need to use RecordTypeId
for this purpose.
As a reference, it is mentioned in this knowledge article:
Changing record types for multiple records via the dataloader is not as straight forward as it would seem. Instead of using the record type name, usage of the record type ID gathered via the URL is required.
You cannot use Record Type Name in data loader to map to a particular record type. You will need to use RecordTypeId
for this purpose.
As a reference, it is mentioned in this knowledge article:
Changing record types for multiple records via the dataloader is not as straight forward as it would seem. Instead of using the record type name, usage of the record type ID gathered via the URL is required.
answered Feb 12 at 14:59
Jayant DasJayant Das
18.4k21330
18.4k21330
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f250018%2fhow-to-load-recordtypes-using-dataloader-based-on-their-names-and-not-their-ids%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Did you enable Bulk API mode?
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 16:16
@sfdcfox No, i did not enable Bulk API
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 12 at 16:18
Try using the Bulk API mode in settings...
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 16:36
with the same file ? ,i mean with this "RecordType.Name" as a header ?
– Merabti Ibrahim
Feb 12 at 16:38
Yes, the Bulk API mode should support that syntax.
– sfdcfox
Feb 12 at 17:12