Calculating value of $text{sinc}(x)$, WolframAlpha and MATLAB give two different answers.












2














I need to evaluate the following:
$$frac{2}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{2pi}{3}(n-4)bigg)-frac{1}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{pi}{3}(n-4)bigg)$$



for $n=[0,...,8]$



I don't have the sinc function in my casio fx so I wanted to use the fact that $text{sinc}(x)=frac{text{sin}(x)}{x}$ and that $text{sinc}(0)=1$
Hence, for $n=0$ I got
$$frac{2}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{2pi}{3}(-4)bigg)-frac{1}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{pi}{3}(-4)bigg)=0.1378....$$



This seems to agree with wolfram alpha:





enter image description here





But then I checked the mark scheme on my past paper that the question is taken from, and there it says that I should've got $0.0093$ so i put it in MATLAB:





enter image description here





...and it also says $0.0093$.



So... which one of the two is correct? What's going on?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    There is a problem for $n=4$.
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:16










  • Matlab includes a factor of Pi in it's definition of sinc. mathworks.com/help/signal/ref/sinc.html
    – Josh B.
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:18










  • @JoshB. That is criminal. I need to write an angry email to Matlab.
    – DudeMan
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:19










  • I see. They use something called normalized sinc. And it would make senses cause Wiki says: In digital signal processing and information theory, the normalized sinc function is commonly defined for x ≠ 0 by bla bla bla. And the course I am doing is signal processing.
    – Kudera Sebastian
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:20












  • This function is not part of core Matlab but rather the Signal Processing Toolbox. As @EeveeTrainer points out below, this normalized sinc function is commonly used in signal processing applications that this toolbox was designed for. You can easily create a non-normalized version, e.g.: sinc2=@(x)sinc(x/pi);.
    – horchler
    Dec 28 '18 at 20:13


















2














I need to evaluate the following:
$$frac{2}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{2pi}{3}(n-4)bigg)-frac{1}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{pi}{3}(n-4)bigg)$$



for $n=[0,...,8]$



I don't have the sinc function in my casio fx so I wanted to use the fact that $text{sinc}(x)=frac{text{sin}(x)}{x}$ and that $text{sinc}(0)=1$
Hence, for $n=0$ I got
$$frac{2}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{2pi}{3}(-4)bigg)-frac{1}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{pi}{3}(-4)bigg)=0.1378....$$



This seems to agree with wolfram alpha:





enter image description here





But then I checked the mark scheme on my past paper that the question is taken from, and there it says that I should've got $0.0093$ so i put it in MATLAB:





enter image description here





...and it also says $0.0093$.



So... which one of the two is correct? What's going on?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    There is a problem for $n=4$.
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:16










  • Matlab includes a factor of Pi in it's definition of sinc. mathworks.com/help/signal/ref/sinc.html
    – Josh B.
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:18










  • @JoshB. That is criminal. I need to write an angry email to Matlab.
    – DudeMan
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:19










  • I see. They use something called normalized sinc. And it would make senses cause Wiki says: In digital signal processing and information theory, the normalized sinc function is commonly defined for x ≠ 0 by bla bla bla. And the course I am doing is signal processing.
    – Kudera Sebastian
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:20












  • This function is not part of core Matlab but rather the Signal Processing Toolbox. As @EeveeTrainer points out below, this normalized sinc function is commonly used in signal processing applications that this toolbox was designed for. You can easily create a non-normalized version, e.g.: sinc2=@(x)sinc(x/pi);.
    – horchler
    Dec 28 '18 at 20:13
















2












2








2


1





I need to evaluate the following:
$$frac{2}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{2pi}{3}(n-4)bigg)-frac{1}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{pi}{3}(n-4)bigg)$$



for $n=[0,...,8]$



I don't have the sinc function in my casio fx so I wanted to use the fact that $text{sinc}(x)=frac{text{sin}(x)}{x}$ and that $text{sinc}(0)=1$
Hence, for $n=0$ I got
$$frac{2}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{2pi}{3}(-4)bigg)-frac{1}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{pi}{3}(-4)bigg)=0.1378....$$



This seems to agree with wolfram alpha:





enter image description here





But then I checked the mark scheme on my past paper that the question is taken from, and there it says that I should've got $0.0093$ so i put it in MATLAB:





enter image description here





...and it also says $0.0093$.



So... which one of the two is correct? What's going on?










share|cite|improve this question















I need to evaluate the following:
$$frac{2}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{2pi}{3}(n-4)bigg)-frac{1}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{pi}{3}(n-4)bigg)$$



for $n=[0,...,8]$



I don't have the sinc function in my casio fx so I wanted to use the fact that $text{sinc}(x)=frac{text{sin}(x)}{x}$ and that $text{sinc}(0)=1$
Hence, for $n=0$ I got
$$frac{2}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{2pi}{3}(-4)bigg)-frac{1}{3}text{sinc}bigg(frac{pi}{3}(-4)bigg)=0.1378....$$



This seems to agree with wolfram alpha:





enter image description here





But then I checked the mark scheme on my past paper that the question is taken from, and there it says that I should've got $0.0093$ so i put it in MATLAB:





enter image description here





...and it also says $0.0093$.



So... which one of the two is correct? What's going on?







trigonometry matlab wolfram-alpha






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 29 '18 at 0:01









Somos

13.1k11034




13.1k11034










asked Dec 28 '18 at 18:10









Kudera SebastianKudera Sebastian

539218




539218








  • 1




    There is a problem for $n=4$.
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:16










  • Matlab includes a factor of Pi in it's definition of sinc. mathworks.com/help/signal/ref/sinc.html
    – Josh B.
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:18










  • @JoshB. That is criminal. I need to write an angry email to Matlab.
    – DudeMan
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:19










  • I see. They use something called normalized sinc. And it would make senses cause Wiki says: In digital signal processing and information theory, the normalized sinc function is commonly defined for x ≠ 0 by bla bla bla. And the course I am doing is signal processing.
    – Kudera Sebastian
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:20












  • This function is not part of core Matlab but rather the Signal Processing Toolbox. As @EeveeTrainer points out below, this normalized sinc function is commonly used in signal processing applications that this toolbox was designed for. You can easily create a non-normalized version, e.g.: sinc2=@(x)sinc(x/pi);.
    – horchler
    Dec 28 '18 at 20:13
















  • 1




    There is a problem for $n=4$.
    – Michael Rozenberg
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:16










  • Matlab includes a factor of Pi in it's definition of sinc. mathworks.com/help/signal/ref/sinc.html
    – Josh B.
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:18










  • @JoshB. That is criminal. I need to write an angry email to Matlab.
    – DudeMan
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:19










  • I see. They use something called normalized sinc. And it would make senses cause Wiki says: In digital signal processing and information theory, the normalized sinc function is commonly defined for x ≠ 0 by bla bla bla. And the course I am doing is signal processing.
    – Kudera Sebastian
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:20












  • This function is not part of core Matlab but rather the Signal Processing Toolbox. As @EeveeTrainer points out below, this normalized sinc function is commonly used in signal processing applications that this toolbox was designed for. You can easily create a non-normalized version, e.g.: sinc2=@(x)sinc(x/pi);.
    – horchler
    Dec 28 '18 at 20:13










1




1




There is a problem for $n=4$.
– Michael Rozenberg
Dec 28 '18 at 18:16




There is a problem for $n=4$.
– Michael Rozenberg
Dec 28 '18 at 18:16












Matlab includes a factor of Pi in it's definition of sinc. mathworks.com/help/signal/ref/sinc.html
– Josh B.
Dec 28 '18 at 18:18




Matlab includes a factor of Pi in it's definition of sinc. mathworks.com/help/signal/ref/sinc.html
– Josh B.
Dec 28 '18 at 18:18












@JoshB. That is criminal. I need to write an angry email to Matlab.
– DudeMan
Dec 28 '18 at 18:19




@JoshB. That is criminal. I need to write an angry email to Matlab.
– DudeMan
Dec 28 '18 at 18:19












I see. They use something called normalized sinc. And it would make senses cause Wiki says: In digital signal processing and information theory, the normalized sinc function is commonly defined for x ≠ 0 by bla bla bla. And the course I am doing is signal processing.
– Kudera Sebastian
Dec 28 '18 at 18:20






I see. They use something called normalized sinc. And it would make senses cause Wiki says: In digital signal processing and information theory, the normalized sinc function is commonly defined for x ≠ 0 by bla bla bla. And the course I am doing is signal processing.
– Kudera Sebastian
Dec 28 '18 at 18:20














This function is not part of core Matlab but rather the Signal Processing Toolbox. As @EeveeTrainer points out below, this normalized sinc function is commonly used in signal processing applications that this toolbox was designed for. You can easily create a non-normalized version, e.g.: sinc2=@(x)sinc(x/pi);.
– horchler
Dec 28 '18 at 20:13






This function is not part of core Matlab but rather the Signal Processing Toolbox. As @EeveeTrainer points out below, this normalized sinc function is commonly used in signal processing applications that this toolbox was designed for. You can easily create a non-normalized version, e.g.: sinc2=@(x)sinc(x/pi);.
– horchler
Dec 28 '18 at 20:13












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














As it happens, there are apparently two different conventions for what the $text{sinc}(x)$ function actually denotes in terms of the $sin(x)$ function. (I ran into this same confusion on my class on Fourier analysis.) The conventions you might see are



$$text{sinc}(x) = frac{sin(x)}{x} ;;; text{or} ;;; text{sinc}(x) = frac{sin(pi x)}{pi x}$$



The latter is known as the "normalized sinc function," per Wikipedia. I don't know much about which is used more when, so I'll leave you with the Wikipedia article in that respect.



Checking your functions if interpreted in the latter way, i.e. for $n=0$



$$frac{2}{3} left( frac{-3}{8pi^2} right) sin bigg(frac{-8pi^2}{3}bigg)-frac{1}{3} left( frac{-3}{4pi^2} right) sin bigg(frac{-4pi^2}{3}bigg)$$



Wolfram Alpha gives a value of $0.0093...$, in agreement with your MATLAB answer. Indeed, as noted by Josh B. in the comments, MATLAB uses the latter convention.



I would assume, then, this is the source of the discrepancy.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Yeah I had a read about it now. Looks like I need to have a discussion with my professor. Couple of weeks ago he defines it in a "standard way" and then suddenly in the past paper it is in the "normalized way".
    – Kudera Sebastian
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:26



















1














Matlab defines
$$ mathrm{sinc}_{text{Matlab}} = begin{cases}
frac{sin(pi t)}{pi t} & t neq 0, \
1 & t = 0
end{cases} text{.} $$



Wolfram (in the Details section) and the rest of the world define
$$ mathrm{sinc}_{text{everyone else}} = begin{cases}
frac{sin t}{t} & t neq 0, \
1 & t = 0
end{cases} text{.} $$



Using Matlab's nonstandard definition of this function, the value of your $n=0$ expression is $0.009321942713359250447 dots$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Yup. Looks like matlab is a rebel.
    – Kudera Sebastian
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:37











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055154%2fcalculating-value-of-textsincx-wolframalpha-and-matlab-give-two-differen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














As it happens, there are apparently two different conventions for what the $text{sinc}(x)$ function actually denotes in terms of the $sin(x)$ function. (I ran into this same confusion on my class on Fourier analysis.) The conventions you might see are



$$text{sinc}(x) = frac{sin(x)}{x} ;;; text{or} ;;; text{sinc}(x) = frac{sin(pi x)}{pi x}$$



The latter is known as the "normalized sinc function," per Wikipedia. I don't know much about which is used more when, so I'll leave you with the Wikipedia article in that respect.



Checking your functions if interpreted in the latter way, i.e. for $n=0$



$$frac{2}{3} left( frac{-3}{8pi^2} right) sin bigg(frac{-8pi^2}{3}bigg)-frac{1}{3} left( frac{-3}{4pi^2} right) sin bigg(frac{-4pi^2}{3}bigg)$$



Wolfram Alpha gives a value of $0.0093...$, in agreement with your MATLAB answer. Indeed, as noted by Josh B. in the comments, MATLAB uses the latter convention.



I would assume, then, this is the source of the discrepancy.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Yeah I had a read about it now. Looks like I need to have a discussion with my professor. Couple of weeks ago he defines it in a "standard way" and then suddenly in the past paper it is in the "normalized way".
    – Kudera Sebastian
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:26
















3














As it happens, there are apparently two different conventions for what the $text{sinc}(x)$ function actually denotes in terms of the $sin(x)$ function. (I ran into this same confusion on my class on Fourier analysis.) The conventions you might see are



$$text{sinc}(x) = frac{sin(x)}{x} ;;; text{or} ;;; text{sinc}(x) = frac{sin(pi x)}{pi x}$$



The latter is known as the "normalized sinc function," per Wikipedia. I don't know much about which is used more when, so I'll leave you with the Wikipedia article in that respect.



Checking your functions if interpreted in the latter way, i.e. for $n=0$



$$frac{2}{3} left( frac{-3}{8pi^2} right) sin bigg(frac{-8pi^2}{3}bigg)-frac{1}{3} left( frac{-3}{4pi^2} right) sin bigg(frac{-4pi^2}{3}bigg)$$



Wolfram Alpha gives a value of $0.0093...$, in agreement with your MATLAB answer. Indeed, as noted by Josh B. in the comments, MATLAB uses the latter convention.



I would assume, then, this is the source of the discrepancy.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Yeah I had a read about it now. Looks like I need to have a discussion with my professor. Couple of weeks ago he defines it in a "standard way" and then suddenly in the past paper it is in the "normalized way".
    – Kudera Sebastian
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:26














3












3








3






As it happens, there are apparently two different conventions for what the $text{sinc}(x)$ function actually denotes in terms of the $sin(x)$ function. (I ran into this same confusion on my class on Fourier analysis.) The conventions you might see are



$$text{sinc}(x) = frac{sin(x)}{x} ;;; text{or} ;;; text{sinc}(x) = frac{sin(pi x)}{pi x}$$



The latter is known as the "normalized sinc function," per Wikipedia. I don't know much about which is used more when, so I'll leave you with the Wikipedia article in that respect.



Checking your functions if interpreted in the latter way, i.e. for $n=0$



$$frac{2}{3} left( frac{-3}{8pi^2} right) sin bigg(frac{-8pi^2}{3}bigg)-frac{1}{3} left( frac{-3}{4pi^2} right) sin bigg(frac{-4pi^2}{3}bigg)$$



Wolfram Alpha gives a value of $0.0093...$, in agreement with your MATLAB answer. Indeed, as noted by Josh B. in the comments, MATLAB uses the latter convention.



I would assume, then, this is the source of the discrepancy.






share|cite|improve this answer














As it happens, there are apparently two different conventions for what the $text{sinc}(x)$ function actually denotes in terms of the $sin(x)$ function. (I ran into this same confusion on my class on Fourier analysis.) The conventions you might see are



$$text{sinc}(x) = frac{sin(x)}{x} ;;; text{or} ;;; text{sinc}(x) = frac{sin(pi x)}{pi x}$$



The latter is known as the "normalized sinc function," per Wikipedia. I don't know much about which is used more when, so I'll leave you with the Wikipedia article in that respect.



Checking your functions if interpreted in the latter way, i.e. for $n=0$



$$frac{2}{3} left( frac{-3}{8pi^2} right) sin bigg(frac{-8pi^2}{3}bigg)-frac{1}{3} left( frac{-3}{4pi^2} right) sin bigg(frac{-4pi^2}{3}bigg)$$



Wolfram Alpha gives a value of $0.0093...$, in agreement with your MATLAB answer. Indeed, as noted by Josh B. in the comments, MATLAB uses the latter convention.



I would assume, then, this is the source of the discrepancy.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 28 '18 at 18:30

























answered Dec 28 '18 at 18:23









Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

5,0211734




5,0211734












  • Yeah I had a read about it now. Looks like I need to have a discussion with my professor. Couple of weeks ago he defines it in a "standard way" and then suddenly in the past paper it is in the "normalized way".
    – Kudera Sebastian
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:26


















  • Yeah I had a read about it now. Looks like I need to have a discussion with my professor. Couple of weeks ago he defines it in a "standard way" and then suddenly in the past paper it is in the "normalized way".
    – Kudera Sebastian
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:26
















Yeah I had a read about it now. Looks like I need to have a discussion with my professor. Couple of weeks ago he defines it in a "standard way" and then suddenly in the past paper it is in the "normalized way".
– Kudera Sebastian
Dec 28 '18 at 18:26




Yeah I had a read about it now. Looks like I need to have a discussion with my professor. Couple of weeks ago he defines it in a "standard way" and then suddenly in the past paper it is in the "normalized way".
– Kudera Sebastian
Dec 28 '18 at 18:26











1














Matlab defines
$$ mathrm{sinc}_{text{Matlab}} = begin{cases}
frac{sin(pi t)}{pi t} & t neq 0, \
1 & t = 0
end{cases} text{.} $$



Wolfram (in the Details section) and the rest of the world define
$$ mathrm{sinc}_{text{everyone else}} = begin{cases}
frac{sin t}{t} & t neq 0, \
1 & t = 0
end{cases} text{.} $$



Using Matlab's nonstandard definition of this function, the value of your $n=0$ expression is $0.009321942713359250447 dots$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Yup. Looks like matlab is a rebel.
    – Kudera Sebastian
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:37
















1














Matlab defines
$$ mathrm{sinc}_{text{Matlab}} = begin{cases}
frac{sin(pi t)}{pi t} & t neq 0, \
1 & t = 0
end{cases} text{.} $$



Wolfram (in the Details section) and the rest of the world define
$$ mathrm{sinc}_{text{everyone else}} = begin{cases}
frac{sin t}{t} & t neq 0, \
1 & t = 0
end{cases} text{.} $$



Using Matlab's nonstandard definition of this function, the value of your $n=0$ expression is $0.009321942713359250447 dots$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Yup. Looks like matlab is a rebel.
    – Kudera Sebastian
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:37














1












1








1






Matlab defines
$$ mathrm{sinc}_{text{Matlab}} = begin{cases}
frac{sin(pi t)}{pi t} & t neq 0, \
1 & t = 0
end{cases} text{.} $$



Wolfram (in the Details section) and the rest of the world define
$$ mathrm{sinc}_{text{everyone else}} = begin{cases}
frac{sin t}{t} & t neq 0, \
1 & t = 0
end{cases} text{.} $$



Using Matlab's nonstandard definition of this function, the value of your $n=0$ expression is $0.009321942713359250447 dots$.






share|cite|improve this answer












Matlab defines
$$ mathrm{sinc}_{text{Matlab}} = begin{cases}
frac{sin(pi t)}{pi t} & t neq 0, \
1 & t = 0
end{cases} text{.} $$



Wolfram (in the Details section) and the rest of the world define
$$ mathrm{sinc}_{text{everyone else}} = begin{cases}
frac{sin t}{t} & t neq 0, \
1 & t = 0
end{cases} text{.} $$



Using Matlab's nonstandard definition of this function, the value of your $n=0$ expression is $0.009321942713359250447 dots$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 28 '18 at 18:33









Eric TowersEric Towers

32.1k22267




32.1k22267












  • Yup. Looks like matlab is a rebel.
    – Kudera Sebastian
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:37


















  • Yup. Looks like matlab is a rebel.
    – Kudera Sebastian
    Dec 28 '18 at 18:37
















Yup. Looks like matlab is a rebel.
– Kudera Sebastian
Dec 28 '18 at 18:37




Yup. Looks like matlab is a rebel.
– Kudera Sebastian
Dec 28 '18 at 18:37


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055154%2fcalculating-value-of-textsincx-wolframalpha-and-matlab-give-two-differen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Questions related to Moebius Transform of Characteristic Function of the Primes

List of scandals in India

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?