Meaning of being a Cauchy sequence
A Cauchy sequence in a metric space $(X,d)$ is a sequence for which the distance between two terms can be made as small as we want, provided we look far enough in the sequence.
Let $X subseteq Y$, where $Y$ is a set on which $d$ can be extended. Is it always true that for any Cauchy sequence ${x_n}$ in $X$ one can find $yin Y$ such that $d(x_n,y)rightarrow 0$?
In other words, is it true that every Cauchy sequence "converges" to something? (and if this something is in $X$ we say it is convergent?)
real-analysis convergence metric-spaces cauchy-sequences
add a comment |
A Cauchy sequence in a metric space $(X,d)$ is a sequence for which the distance between two terms can be made as small as we want, provided we look far enough in the sequence.
Let $X subseteq Y$, where $Y$ is a set on which $d$ can be extended. Is it always true that for any Cauchy sequence ${x_n}$ in $X$ one can find $yin Y$ such that $d(x_n,y)rightarrow 0$?
In other words, is it true that every Cauchy sequence "converges" to something? (and if this something is in $X$ we say it is convergent?)
real-analysis convergence metric-spaces cauchy-sequences
1
No. In fact, the property you are describing is called completeness. A metric space is $complete$ if every Cauchy sequence converges.
– John Douma
Dec 28 '18 at 19:43
add a comment |
A Cauchy sequence in a metric space $(X,d)$ is a sequence for which the distance between two terms can be made as small as we want, provided we look far enough in the sequence.
Let $X subseteq Y$, where $Y$ is a set on which $d$ can be extended. Is it always true that for any Cauchy sequence ${x_n}$ in $X$ one can find $yin Y$ such that $d(x_n,y)rightarrow 0$?
In other words, is it true that every Cauchy sequence "converges" to something? (and if this something is in $X$ we say it is convergent?)
real-analysis convergence metric-spaces cauchy-sequences
A Cauchy sequence in a metric space $(X,d)$ is a sequence for which the distance between two terms can be made as small as we want, provided we look far enough in the sequence.
Let $X subseteq Y$, where $Y$ is a set on which $d$ can be extended. Is it always true that for any Cauchy sequence ${x_n}$ in $X$ one can find $yin Y$ such that $d(x_n,y)rightarrow 0$?
In other words, is it true that every Cauchy sequence "converges" to something? (and if this something is in $X$ we say it is convergent?)
real-analysis convergence metric-spaces cauchy-sequences
real-analysis convergence metric-spaces cauchy-sequences
edited Dec 28 '18 at 19:59
Leonardo
asked Dec 28 '18 at 19:34
LeonardoLeonardo
3128
3128
1
No. In fact, the property you are describing is called completeness. A metric space is $complete$ if every Cauchy sequence converges.
– John Douma
Dec 28 '18 at 19:43
add a comment |
1
No. In fact, the property you are describing is called completeness. A metric space is $complete$ if every Cauchy sequence converges.
– John Douma
Dec 28 '18 at 19:43
1
1
No. In fact, the property you are describing is called completeness. A metric space is $complete$ if every Cauchy sequence converges.
– John Douma
Dec 28 '18 at 19:43
No. In fact, the property you are describing is called completeness. A metric space is $complete$ if every Cauchy sequence converges.
– John Douma
Dec 28 '18 at 19:43
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I think what you're looking for is the concept of the completion of the metric space $X$.
Here you construct $Y$ by adding to $X$ an "artificial" limit element for each Cauchy sequence that doesn't already have one in $X$ -- or rather, for each equivalence class of such Cauchy sequence where sequences $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ are related if $d(x_n,y_n)to 0$.
One main example of this is that $mathbb R$ is a metric completion of $mathbb Q$.
So my question could be rephrased into: does every metric space admit a completion?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 20:02
@Leonardo: Yes it does. See e.g. Wikipedia for more details.
– Henning Makholm
Dec 28 '18 at 20:18
add a comment |
No, in order to show that a Cauchy Sequence converges, a more delicate approach would be needed and that's not always the case. If, though, one proves that for a space $(X,d) subseteq (Y,d)$ it is $d(x_n,y) to 0$ for a Cauchy Sequence ${x_n}_{n in mathbb N} in X$, that means that the space $X$ equipped with the metric $d$ is complete, thus Banach (if the metric $d$ is a norm of course, thus we are dealing with a complete normed space).
Banach is terminology for complete normed spaces.
– Math_QED
Dec 28 '18 at 19:57
I didn't specify $y in X$. So what you're saying is that is if $exists y in Y $ such that $ d(x_n,y) $ vanishes then I could prove $y in X$?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 19:58
@Leonardo I didn't say $y in X$.
– Rebellos
Dec 28 '18 at 20:02
@Rebellos But a complete metric space $(X,d)$ is one in which every Cauchy sequence in $X$ is convergent in X, so when you said that $(X,d)$ is complete if $d(x_n,y)$ vanishes you're implying $ y in X$, aren't you?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055222%2fmeaning-of-being-a-cauchy-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I think what you're looking for is the concept of the completion of the metric space $X$.
Here you construct $Y$ by adding to $X$ an "artificial" limit element for each Cauchy sequence that doesn't already have one in $X$ -- or rather, for each equivalence class of such Cauchy sequence where sequences $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ are related if $d(x_n,y_n)to 0$.
One main example of this is that $mathbb R$ is a metric completion of $mathbb Q$.
So my question could be rephrased into: does every metric space admit a completion?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 20:02
@Leonardo: Yes it does. See e.g. Wikipedia for more details.
– Henning Makholm
Dec 28 '18 at 20:18
add a comment |
I think what you're looking for is the concept of the completion of the metric space $X$.
Here you construct $Y$ by adding to $X$ an "artificial" limit element for each Cauchy sequence that doesn't already have one in $X$ -- or rather, for each equivalence class of such Cauchy sequence where sequences $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ are related if $d(x_n,y_n)to 0$.
One main example of this is that $mathbb R$ is a metric completion of $mathbb Q$.
So my question could be rephrased into: does every metric space admit a completion?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 20:02
@Leonardo: Yes it does. See e.g. Wikipedia for more details.
– Henning Makholm
Dec 28 '18 at 20:18
add a comment |
I think what you're looking for is the concept of the completion of the metric space $X$.
Here you construct $Y$ by adding to $X$ an "artificial" limit element for each Cauchy sequence that doesn't already have one in $X$ -- or rather, for each equivalence class of such Cauchy sequence where sequences $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ are related if $d(x_n,y_n)to 0$.
One main example of this is that $mathbb R$ is a metric completion of $mathbb Q$.
I think what you're looking for is the concept of the completion of the metric space $X$.
Here you construct $Y$ by adding to $X$ an "artificial" limit element for each Cauchy sequence that doesn't already have one in $X$ -- or rather, for each equivalence class of such Cauchy sequence where sequences $(x_n)$ and $(y_n)$ are related if $d(x_n,y_n)to 0$.
One main example of this is that $mathbb R$ is a metric completion of $mathbb Q$.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 19:58
Henning MakholmHenning Makholm
238k16303540
238k16303540
So my question could be rephrased into: does every metric space admit a completion?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 20:02
@Leonardo: Yes it does. See e.g. Wikipedia for more details.
– Henning Makholm
Dec 28 '18 at 20:18
add a comment |
So my question could be rephrased into: does every metric space admit a completion?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 20:02
@Leonardo: Yes it does. See e.g. Wikipedia for more details.
– Henning Makholm
Dec 28 '18 at 20:18
So my question could be rephrased into: does every metric space admit a completion?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 20:02
So my question could be rephrased into: does every metric space admit a completion?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 20:02
@Leonardo: Yes it does. See e.g. Wikipedia for more details.
– Henning Makholm
Dec 28 '18 at 20:18
@Leonardo: Yes it does. See e.g. Wikipedia for more details.
– Henning Makholm
Dec 28 '18 at 20:18
add a comment |
No, in order to show that a Cauchy Sequence converges, a more delicate approach would be needed and that's not always the case. If, though, one proves that for a space $(X,d) subseteq (Y,d)$ it is $d(x_n,y) to 0$ for a Cauchy Sequence ${x_n}_{n in mathbb N} in X$, that means that the space $X$ equipped with the metric $d$ is complete, thus Banach (if the metric $d$ is a norm of course, thus we are dealing with a complete normed space).
Banach is terminology for complete normed spaces.
– Math_QED
Dec 28 '18 at 19:57
I didn't specify $y in X$. So what you're saying is that is if $exists y in Y $ such that $ d(x_n,y) $ vanishes then I could prove $y in X$?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 19:58
@Leonardo I didn't say $y in X$.
– Rebellos
Dec 28 '18 at 20:02
@Rebellos But a complete metric space $(X,d)$ is one in which every Cauchy sequence in $X$ is convergent in X, so when you said that $(X,d)$ is complete if $d(x_n,y)$ vanishes you're implying $ y in X$, aren't you?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
No, in order to show that a Cauchy Sequence converges, a more delicate approach would be needed and that's not always the case. If, though, one proves that for a space $(X,d) subseteq (Y,d)$ it is $d(x_n,y) to 0$ for a Cauchy Sequence ${x_n}_{n in mathbb N} in X$, that means that the space $X$ equipped with the metric $d$ is complete, thus Banach (if the metric $d$ is a norm of course, thus we are dealing with a complete normed space).
Banach is terminology for complete normed spaces.
– Math_QED
Dec 28 '18 at 19:57
I didn't specify $y in X$. So what you're saying is that is if $exists y in Y $ such that $ d(x_n,y) $ vanishes then I could prove $y in X$?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 19:58
@Leonardo I didn't say $y in X$.
– Rebellos
Dec 28 '18 at 20:02
@Rebellos But a complete metric space $(X,d)$ is one in which every Cauchy sequence in $X$ is convergent in X, so when you said that $(X,d)$ is complete if $d(x_n,y)$ vanishes you're implying $ y in X$, aren't you?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
No, in order to show that a Cauchy Sequence converges, a more delicate approach would be needed and that's not always the case. If, though, one proves that for a space $(X,d) subseteq (Y,d)$ it is $d(x_n,y) to 0$ for a Cauchy Sequence ${x_n}_{n in mathbb N} in X$, that means that the space $X$ equipped with the metric $d$ is complete, thus Banach (if the metric $d$ is a norm of course, thus we are dealing with a complete normed space).
No, in order to show that a Cauchy Sequence converges, a more delicate approach would be needed and that's not always the case. If, though, one proves that for a space $(X,d) subseteq (Y,d)$ it is $d(x_n,y) to 0$ for a Cauchy Sequence ${x_n}_{n in mathbb N} in X$, that means that the space $X$ equipped with the metric $d$ is complete, thus Banach (if the metric $d$ is a norm of course, thus we are dealing with a complete normed space).
edited Dec 28 '18 at 20:03
answered Dec 28 '18 at 19:49
RebellosRebellos
14.5k31246
14.5k31246
Banach is terminology for complete normed spaces.
– Math_QED
Dec 28 '18 at 19:57
I didn't specify $y in X$. So what you're saying is that is if $exists y in Y $ such that $ d(x_n,y) $ vanishes then I could prove $y in X$?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 19:58
@Leonardo I didn't say $y in X$.
– Rebellos
Dec 28 '18 at 20:02
@Rebellos But a complete metric space $(X,d)$ is one in which every Cauchy sequence in $X$ is convergent in X, so when you said that $(X,d)$ is complete if $d(x_n,y)$ vanishes you're implying $ y in X$, aren't you?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
Banach is terminology for complete normed spaces.
– Math_QED
Dec 28 '18 at 19:57
I didn't specify $y in X$. So what you're saying is that is if $exists y in Y $ such that $ d(x_n,y) $ vanishes then I could prove $y in X$?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 19:58
@Leonardo I didn't say $y in X$.
– Rebellos
Dec 28 '18 at 20:02
@Rebellos But a complete metric space $(X,d)$ is one in which every Cauchy sequence in $X$ is convergent in X, so when you said that $(X,d)$ is complete if $d(x_n,y)$ vanishes you're implying $ y in X$, aren't you?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 20:07
Banach is terminology for complete normed spaces.
– Math_QED
Dec 28 '18 at 19:57
Banach is terminology for complete normed spaces.
– Math_QED
Dec 28 '18 at 19:57
I didn't specify $y in X$. So what you're saying is that is if $exists y in Y $ such that $ d(x_n,y) $ vanishes then I could prove $y in X$?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 19:58
I didn't specify $y in X$. So what you're saying is that is if $exists y in Y $ such that $ d(x_n,y) $ vanishes then I could prove $y in X$?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 19:58
@Leonardo I didn't say $y in X$.
– Rebellos
Dec 28 '18 at 20:02
@Leonardo I didn't say $y in X$.
– Rebellos
Dec 28 '18 at 20:02
@Rebellos But a complete metric space $(X,d)$ is one in which every Cauchy sequence in $X$ is convergent in X, so when you said that $(X,d)$ is complete if $d(x_n,y)$ vanishes you're implying $ y in X$, aren't you?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 20:07
@Rebellos But a complete metric space $(X,d)$ is one in which every Cauchy sequence in $X$ is convergent in X, so when you said that $(X,d)$ is complete if $d(x_n,y)$ vanishes you're implying $ y in X$, aren't you?
– Leonardo
Dec 28 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055222%2fmeaning-of-being-a-cauchy-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
No. In fact, the property you are describing is called completeness. A metric space is $complete$ if every Cauchy sequence converges.
– John Douma
Dec 28 '18 at 19:43