What is the canonical process of a measure space $(Omega, mathscr{F}, mathbb{Q})$?












1












$begingroup$


I was reading paper which referred to a canonical process within the context of a measure space $(Omega, mathscr{F}, mathbb{Q})$. The surrounding discussion was of functions $a:[t,T] rightarrow Omega$, and the canonical process was denoted $(mathbb{S}_t)^T_{t=0}$.



It may be useful to know that the term was used when defining a "martingale measure". A measure $mathbb{Q}$ was said to be a martingale measure if the canonical process is a local martingale with respect to the measure and $mathbb{S}(0) = 1$ a.s.



What could this canonical process be? Any help is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I was reading paper which referred to a canonical process within the context of a measure space $(Omega, mathscr{F}, mathbb{Q})$. The surrounding discussion was of functions $a:[t,T] rightarrow Omega$, and the canonical process was denoted $(mathbb{S}_t)^T_{t=0}$.



    It may be useful to know that the term was used when defining a "martingale measure". A measure $mathbb{Q}$ was said to be a martingale measure if the canonical process is a local martingale with respect to the measure and $mathbb{S}(0) = 1$ a.s.



    What could this canonical process be? Any help is appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I was reading paper which referred to a canonical process within the context of a measure space $(Omega, mathscr{F}, mathbb{Q})$. The surrounding discussion was of functions $a:[t,T] rightarrow Omega$, and the canonical process was denoted $(mathbb{S}_t)^T_{t=0}$.



      It may be useful to know that the term was used when defining a "martingale measure". A measure $mathbb{Q}$ was said to be a martingale measure if the canonical process is a local martingale with respect to the measure and $mathbb{S}(0) = 1$ a.s.



      What could this canonical process be? Any help is appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I was reading paper which referred to a canonical process within the context of a measure space $(Omega, mathscr{F}, mathbb{Q})$. The surrounding discussion was of functions $a:[t,T] rightarrow Omega$, and the canonical process was denoted $(mathbb{S}_t)^T_{t=0}$.



      It may be useful to know that the term was used when defining a "martingale measure". A measure $mathbb{Q}$ was said to be a martingale measure if the canonical process is a local martingale with respect to the measure and $mathbb{S}(0) = 1$ a.s.



      What could this canonical process be? Any help is appreciated.







      measure-theory stochastic-processes






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 12 at 12:13









      DavenDaven

      39519




      39519






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          If ${X_s:sleq t leq T}$ is a given process on some probability space then, by Kolmpgorov's Theorem we can construct a measure $Q$ on $mathbb R ^{[t,T]}$ (with the sigma algebra generated by the projection maps) such that the random variables $Y_s:tleq sleq T$ defined by $Y_s(omega)=omega (s)$ defined on $(mathbb R ^{[t,T]},Q)$ have the same finite dimensional distributions as the given process. This new process is called the canonical process corresponding to the original process. You can also start with a probability measure $Q$ on $mathbb R ^{[t,T]}$ instead of starting with a process ${X_s:sleq t leq T}$. For example if $Q$ is the Wiener measure on $C[0,1]$ then the canonical process associated with $Q$ is deined by $Y_s(omega)=omega (s)$ for $omega in C[0,1]$ and $s in [0,1]$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You have started by assuming we have process X. The context in which I am working does not have this; we have only a measure space and we are defining what it means to be a martingale measure. I am not saying what you have said is wrong- this objection is just to highlight where my lack of understanding lies
            $endgroup$
            – Daven
            Jan 12 at 12:44












          • $begingroup$
            @Daven I have edited my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jan 12 at 12:49











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070841%2fwhat-is-the-canonical-process-of-a-measure-space-omega-mathscrf-mathbb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          If ${X_s:sleq t leq T}$ is a given process on some probability space then, by Kolmpgorov's Theorem we can construct a measure $Q$ on $mathbb R ^{[t,T]}$ (with the sigma algebra generated by the projection maps) such that the random variables $Y_s:tleq sleq T$ defined by $Y_s(omega)=omega (s)$ defined on $(mathbb R ^{[t,T]},Q)$ have the same finite dimensional distributions as the given process. This new process is called the canonical process corresponding to the original process. You can also start with a probability measure $Q$ on $mathbb R ^{[t,T]}$ instead of starting with a process ${X_s:sleq t leq T}$. For example if $Q$ is the Wiener measure on $C[0,1]$ then the canonical process associated with $Q$ is deined by $Y_s(omega)=omega (s)$ for $omega in C[0,1]$ and $s in [0,1]$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You have started by assuming we have process X. The context in which I am working does not have this; we have only a measure space and we are defining what it means to be a martingale measure. I am not saying what you have said is wrong- this objection is just to highlight where my lack of understanding lies
            $endgroup$
            – Daven
            Jan 12 at 12:44












          • $begingroup$
            @Daven I have edited my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jan 12 at 12:49
















          1












          $begingroup$

          If ${X_s:sleq t leq T}$ is a given process on some probability space then, by Kolmpgorov's Theorem we can construct a measure $Q$ on $mathbb R ^{[t,T]}$ (with the sigma algebra generated by the projection maps) such that the random variables $Y_s:tleq sleq T$ defined by $Y_s(omega)=omega (s)$ defined on $(mathbb R ^{[t,T]},Q)$ have the same finite dimensional distributions as the given process. This new process is called the canonical process corresponding to the original process. You can also start with a probability measure $Q$ on $mathbb R ^{[t,T]}$ instead of starting with a process ${X_s:sleq t leq T}$. For example if $Q$ is the Wiener measure on $C[0,1]$ then the canonical process associated with $Q$ is deined by $Y_s(omega)=omega (s)$ for $omega in C[0,1]$ and $s in [0,1]$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You have started by assuming we have process X. The context in which I am working does not have this; we have only a measure space and we are defining what it means to be a martingale measure. I am not saying what you have said is wrong- this objection is just to highlight where my lack of understanding lies
            $endgroup$
            – Daven
            Jan 12 at 12:44












          • $begingroup$
            @Daven I have edited my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jan 12 at 12:49














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          If ${X_s:sleq t leq T}$ is a given process on some probability space then, by Kolmpgorov's Theorem we can construct a measure $Q$ on $mathbb R ^{[t,T]}$ (with the sigma algebra generated by the projection maps) such that the random variables $Y_s:tleq sleq T$ defined by $Y_s(omega)=omega (s)$ defined on $(mathbb R ^{[t,T]},Q)$ have the same finite dimensional distributions as the given process. This new process is called the canonical process corresponding to the original process. You can also start with a probability measure $Q$ on $mathbb R ^{[t,T]}$ instead of starting with a process ${X_s:sleq t leq T}$. For example if $Q$ is the Wiener measure on $C[0,1]$ then the canonical process associated with $Q$ is deined by $Y_s(omega)=omega (s)$ for $omega in C[0,1]$ and $s in [0,1]$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          If ${X_s:sleq t leq T}$ is a given process on some probability space then, by Kolmpgorov's Theorem we can construct a measure $Q$ on $mathbb R ^{[t,T]}$ (with the sigma algebra generated by the projection maps) such that the random variables $Y_s:tleq sleq T$ defined by $Y_s(omega)=omega (s)$ defined on $(mathbb R ^{[t,T]},Q)$ have the same finite dimensional distributions as the given process. This new process is called the canonical process corresponding to the original process. You can also start with a probability measure $Q$ on $mathbb R ^{[t,T]}$ instead of starting with a process ${X_s:sleq t leq T}$. For example if $Q$ is the Wiener measure on $C[0,1]$ then the canonical process associated with $Q$ is deined by $Y_s(omega)=omega (s)$ for $omega in C[0,1]$ and $s in [0,1]$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 12 at 12:49

























          answered Jan 12 at 12:25









          Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

          66.9k53067




          66.9k53067












          • $begingroup$
            You have started by assuming we have process X. The context in which I am working does not have this; we have only a measure space and we are defining what it means to be a martingale measure. I am not saying what you have said is wrong- this objection is just to highlight where my lack of understanding lies
            $endgroup$
            – Daven
            Jan 12 at 12:44












          • $begingroup$
            @Daven I have edited my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jan 12 at 12:49


















          • $begingroup$
            You have started by assuming we have process X. The context in which I am working does not have this; we have only a measure space and we are defining what it means to be a martingale measure. I am not saying what you have said is wrong- this objection is just to highlight where my lack of understanding lies
            $endgroup$
            – Daven
            Jan 12 at 12:44












          • $begingroup$
            @Daven I have edited my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jan 12 at 12:49
















          $begingroup$
          You have started by assuming we have process X. The context in which I am working does not have this; we have only a measure space and we are defining what it means to be a martingale measure. I am not saying what you have said is wrong- this objection is just to highlight where my lack of understanding lies
          $endgroup$
          – Daven
          Jan 12 at 12:44






          $begingroup$
          You have started by assuming we have process X. The context in which I am working does not have this; we have only a measure space and we are defining what it means to be a martingale measure. I am not saying what you have said is wrong- this objection is just to highlight where my lack of understanding lies
          $endgroup$
          – Daven
          Jan 12 at 12:44














          $begingroup$
          @Daven I have edited my answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Kavi Rama Murthy
          Jan 12 at 12:49




          $begingroup$
          @Daven I have edited my answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Kavi Rama Murthy
          Jan 12 at 12:49


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070841%2fwhat-is-the-canonical-process-of-a-measure-space-omega-mathscrf-mathbb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Human spaceflight

          Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

          張江高科駅