Extension of tracial state to the multiplier algebra












2












$begingroup$


If $A$ is a $C^*$ algebra, I know the fact: If $tau$ is a state on $A$, we can extend it to a state on $M(A)$, by continuity of $tau$ and where $M(A)$ is the multiplier algebra of $A$.



If $tau$ is a tracial state on $A$, can we extend $tau$ to get a tracial state on $M(A)$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I haven't checked the details but I will proceed as follows: First $M(A)$ has a coarser topology that the norm topology, that is the strong topology given by seeing $M(A)$ as the space of adjointable operators over $A$ as a Hilbert $C^*$-module. Then, extend $tau$ by strong continuity and use the fact that the tracial identity is preserved.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Jul 23 '18 at 11:05
















2












$begingroup$


If $A$ is a $C^*$ algebra, I know the fact: If $tau$ is a state on $A$, we can extend it to a state on $M(A)$, by continuity of $tau$ and where $M(A)$ is the multiplier algebra of $A$.



If $tau$ is a tracial state on $A$, can we extend $tau$ to get a tracial state on $M(A)$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I haven't checked the details but I will proceed as follows: First $M(A)$ has a coarser topology that the norm topology, that is the strong topology given by seeing $M(A)$ as the space of adjointable operators over $A$ as a Hilbert $C^*$-module. Then, extend $tau$ by strong continuity and use the fact that the tracial identity is preserved.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Jul 23 '18 at 11:05














2












2








2





$begingroup$


If $A$ is a $C^*$ algebra, I know the fact: If $tau$ is a state on $A$, we can extend it to a state on $M(A)$, by continuity of $tau$ and where $M(A)$ is the multiplier algebra of $A$.



If $tau$ is a tracial state on $A$, can we extend $tau$ to get a tracial state on $M(A)$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




If $A$ is a $C^*$ algebra, I know the fact: If $tau$ is a state on $A$, we can extend it to a state on $M(A)$, by continuity of $tau$ and where $M(A)$ is the multiplier algebra of $A$.



If $tau$ is a tracial state on $A$, can we extend $tau$ to get a tracial state on $M(A)$?







operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 12 at 12:06







user42761

















asked Jul 22 '18 at 2:54









mathrookiemathrookie

914512




914512












  • $begingroup$
    I haven't checked the details but I will proceed as follows: First $M(A)$ has a coarser topology that the norm topology, that is the strong topology given by seeing $M(A)$ as the space of adjointable operators over $A$ as a Hilbert $C^*$-module. Then, extend $tau$ by strong continuity and use the fact that the tracial identity is preserved.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Jul 23 '18 at 11:05


















  • $begingroup$
    I haven't checked the details but I will proceed as follows: First $M(A)$ has a coarser topology that the norm topology, that is the strong topology given by seeing $M(A)$ as the space of adjointable operators over $A$ as a Hilbert $C^*$-module. Then, extend $tau$ by strong continuity and use the fact that the tracial identity is preserved.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Jul 23 '18 at 11:05
















$begingroup$
I haven't checked the details but I will proceed as follows: First $M(A)$ has a coarser topology that the norm topology, that is the strong topology given by seeing $M(A)$ as the space of adjointable operators over $A$ as a Hilbert $C^*$-module. Then, extend $tau$ by strong continuity and use the fact that the tracial identity is preserved.
$endgroup$
– Adrián González-Pérez
Jul 23 '18 at 11:05




$begingroup$
I haven't checked the details but I will proceed as follows: First $M(A)$ has a coarser topology that the norm topology, that is the strong topology given by seeing $M(A)$ as the space of adjointable operators over $A$ as a Hilbert $C^*$-module. Then, extend $tau$ by strong continuity and use the fact that the tracial identity is preserved.
$endgroup$
– Adrián González-Pérez
Jul 23 '18 at 11:05










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Let $tau$ be a state on $M(A)$ such that its restriction to $A$ satisfies $tau(ab) = tau(ba)$ for all $a,b in A$. For $x,y in M(A)$ we then have
$$
tau(xy) = s-limtau((xe_lambda)(e_lambda y)) = s-lim tau(e_lambda yx e_lambda) = tau(yx),
$$

where $(e_lambda)_lambda$ is an approximate unit for $A$. Note that $e_lambda to 1$ strictly and hence $e_lambda x to x$ strictly. Since $tau$ is strictly continuous, the result follows.



Note that in the case $A$ is separable, $A$ is a hereditary C*-subalgebra of $M(A)$, namely $A = overline{hM(A)h}$, where $h in A$ is strictly positive. In that case every state on $A$ has a unique extension to $M(A)$ given by
$$
tau(x) = lim tau(e_lambda x e_lambda) qquad (x in M(A)).
$$



Edit: For the argumet to work one needs that $tau$ is strictly continuous on $M(A)$. I will check if this is automatic and then update the answer.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2859052%2fextension-of-tracial-state-to-the-multiplier-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Let $tau$ be a state on $M(A)$ such that its restriction to $A$ satisfies $tau(ab) = tau(ba)$ for all $a,b in A$. For $x,y in M(A)$ we then have
    $$
    tau(xy) = s-limtau((xe_lambda)(e_lambda y)) = s-lim tau(e_lambda yx e_lambda) = tau(yx),
    $$

    where $(e_lambda)_lambda$ is an approximate unit for $A$. Note that $e_lambda to 1$ strictly and hence $e_lambda x to x$ strictly. Since $tau$ is strictly continuous, the result follows.



    Note that in the case $A$ is separable, $A$ is a hereditary C*-subalgebra of $M(A)$, namely $A = overline{hM(A)h}$, where $h in A$ is strictly positive. In that case every state on $A$ has a unique extension to $M(A)$ given by
    $$
    tau(x) = lim tau(e_lambda x e_lambda) qquad (x in M(A)).
    $$



    Edit: For the argumet to work one needs that $tau$ is strictly continuous on $M(A)$. I will check if this is automatic and then update the answer.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Let $tau$ be a state on $M(A)$ such that its restriction to $A$ satisfies $tau(ab) = tau(ba)$ for all $a,b in A$. For $x,y in M(A)$ we then have
      $$
      tau(xy) = s-limtau((xe_lambda)(e_lambda y)) = s-lim tau(e_lambda yx e_lambda) = tau(yx),
      $$

      where $(e_lambda)_lambda$ is an approximate unit for $A$. Note that $e_lambda to 1$ strictly and hence $e_lambda x to x$ strictly. Since $tau$ is strictly continuous, the result follows.



      Note that in the case $A$ is separable, $A$ is a hereditary C*-subalgebra of $M(A)$, namely $A = overline{hM(A)h}$, where $h in A$ is strictly positive. In that case every state on $A$ has a unique extension to $M(A)$ given by
      $$
      tau(x) = lim tau(e_lambda x e_lambda) qquad (x in M(A)).
      $$



      Edit: For the argumet to work one needs that $tau$ is strictly continuous on $M(A)$. I will check if this is automatic and then update the answer.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Let $tau$ be a state on $M(A)$ such that its restriction to $A$ satisfies $tau(ab) = tau(ba)$ for all $a,b in A$. For $x,y in M(A)$ we then have
        $$
        tau(xy) = s-limtau((xe_lambda)(e_lambda y)) = s-lim tau(e_lambda yx e_lambda) = tau(yx),
        $$

        where $(e_lambda)_lambda$ is an approximate unit for $A$. Note that $e_lambda to 1$ strictly and hence $e_lambda x to x$ strictly. Since $tau$ is strictly continuous, the result follows.



        Note that in the case $A$ is separable, $A$ is a hereditary C*-subalgebra of $M(A)$, namely $A = overline{hM(A)h}$, where $h in A$ is strictly positive. In that case every state on $A$ has a unique extension to $M(A)$ given by
        $$
        tau(x) = lim tau(e_lambda x e_lambda) qquad (x in M(A)).
        $$



        Edit: For the argumet to work one needs that $tau$ is strictly continuous on $M(A)$. I will check if this is automatic and then update the answer.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Let $tau$ be a state on $M(A)$ such that its restriction to $A$ satisfies $tau(ab) = tau(ba)$ for all $a,b in A$. For $x,y in M(A)$ we then have
        $$
        tau(xy) = s-limtau((xe_lambda)(e_lambda y)) = s-lim tau(e_lambda yx e_lambda) = tau(yx),
        $$

        where $(e_lambda)_lambda$ is an approximate unit for $A$. Note that $e_lambda to 1$ strictly and hence $e_lambda x to x$ strictly. Since $tau$ is strictly continuous, the result follows.



        Note that in the case $A$ is separable, $A$ is a hereditary C*-subalgebra of $M(A)$, namely $A = overline{hM(A)h}$, where $h in A$ is strictly positive. In that case every state on $A$ has a unique extension to $M(A)$ given by
        $$
        tau(x) = lim tau(e_lambda x e_lambda) qquad (x in M(A)).
        $$



        Edit: For the argumet to work one needs that $tau$ is strictly continuous on $M(A)$. I will check if this is automatic and then update the answer.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 12 at 13:00

























        answered Jul 24 '18 at 21:59







        user42761





































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2859052%2fextension-of-tracial-state-to-the-multiplier-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg