Why is the indicator function of rational numbers a simple function?
$begingroup$
I understand the simple function is one that is measurable and takes on finitely many values. However, the amount of values in the set Q are infinite. Thanks
real-analysis measure-theory simple-functions
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I understand the simple function is one that is measurable and takes on finitely many values. However, the amount of values in the set Q are infinite. Thanks
real-analysis measure-theory simple-functions
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The indicator function, any indicator function, takes on at most two values.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:09
$begingroup$
The indicator function of the rationals is $fcolon mathbb R to {0,1}$ with $f(x)=1$ iff $xin mathbb Q$. It only takes two values.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Jan 14 at 21:09
2
$begingroup$
Is it because it only takes on the value 0 and 1?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:09
$begingroup$
Ah I see, very stupid, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:10
$begingroup$
Yes! Well, you also have to argue that $mathbb Q$ is measurable, but as it is countable it has measure $0$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:10
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I understand the simple function is one that is measurable and takes on finitely many values. However, the amount of values in the set Q are infinite. Thanks
real-analysis measure-theory simple-functions
$endgroup$
I understand the simple function is one that is measurable and takes on finitely many values. However, the amount of values in the set Q are infinite. Thanks
real-analysis measure-theory simple-functions
real-analysis measure-theory simple-functions
asked Jan 14 at 21:08
Thomas Mc DonaldThomas Mc Donald
63
63
$begingroup$
The indicator function, any indicator function, takes on at most two values.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:09
$begingroup$
The indicator function of the rationals is $fcolon mathbb R to {0,1}$ with $f(x)=1$ iff $xin mathbb Q$. It only takes two values.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Jan 14 at 21:09
2
$begingroup$
Is it because it only takes on the value 0 and 1?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:09
$begingroup$
Ah I see, very stupid, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:10
$begingroup$
Yes! Well, you also have to argue that $mathbb Q$ is measurable, but as it is countable it has measure $0$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:10
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
The indicator function, any indicator function, takes on at most two values.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:09
$begingroup$
The indicator function of the rationals is $fcolon mathbb R to {0,1}$ with $f(x)=1$ iff $xin mathbb Q$. It only takes two values.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Jan 14 at 21:09
2
$begingroup$
Is it because it only takes on the value 0 and 1?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:09
$begingroup$
Ah I see, very stupid, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:10
$begingroup$
Yes! Well, you also have to argue that $mathbb Q$ is measurable, but as it is countable it has measure $0$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:10
$begingroup$
The indicator function, any indicator function, takes on at most two values.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:09
$begingroup$
The indicator function, any indicator function, takes on at most two values.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:09
$begingroup$
The indicator function of the rationals is $fcolon mathbb R to {0,1}$ with $f(x)=1$ iff $xin mathbb Q$. It only takes two values.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Jan 14 at 21:09
$begingroup$
The indicator function of the rationals is $fcolon mathbb R to {0,1}$ with $f(x)=1$ iff $xin mathbb Q$. It only takes two values.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Jan 14 at 21:09
2
2
$begingroup$
Is it because it only takes on the value 0 and 1?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:09
$begingroup$
Is it because it only takes on the value 0 and 1?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:09
$begingroup$
Ah I see, very stupid, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:10
$begingroup$
Ah I see, very stupid, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:10
$begingroup$
Yes! Well, you also have to argue that $mathbb Q$ is measurable, but as it is countable it has measure $0$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:10
$begingroup$
Yes! Well, you also have to argue that $mathbb Q$ is measurable, but as it is countable it has measure $0$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:10
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073746%2fwhy-is-the-indicator-function-of-rational-numbers-a-simple-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073746%2fwhy-is-the-indicator-function-of-rational-numbers-a-simple-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The indicator function, any indicator function, takes on at most two values.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:09
$begingroup$
The indicator function of the rationals is $fcolon mathbb R to {0,1}$ with $f(x)=1$ iff $xin mathbb Q$. It only takes two values.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Jan 14 at 21:09
2
$begingroup$
Is it because it only takes on the value 0 and 1?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:09
$begingroup$
Ah I see, very stupid, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:10
$begingroup$
Yes! Well, you also have to argue that $mathbb Q$ is measurable, but as it is countable it has measure $0$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:10