Changing order of integration:$int_0^inftyint_{-infty}^{-y}f(x)mathrm dxmathrm...
$begingroup$
Why does $$int_{0}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{-y} f(x)mathrm dx mathrm dy Rightarrow int_{-infty}^{0} int_{0}^{-x} f(x) mathrm dy mathrm dx$$
The title is pretty self explanatory. I couldn't see how to properly change the order of the left integeral to the right one.
I'd love to hear your thoughts, thanks.
integration multivariable-calculus change-of-variable
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why does $$int_{0}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{-y} f(x)mathrm dx mathrm dy Rightarrow int_{-infty}^{0} int_{0}^{-x} f(x) mathrm dy mathrm dx$$
The title is pretty self explanatory. I couldn't see how to properly change the order of the left integeral to the right one.
I'd love to hear your thoughts, thanks.
integration multivariable-calculus change-of-variable
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Have you tried drawing the region?
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
Jan 14 at 21:36
1
$begingroup$
The first thing that comes to mind is Paul's Online Math Notes. They're very good at explaining double integrals over general regions. tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/DIGeneralRegion.aspx
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
Jan 14 at 21:46
1
$begingroup$
Apply Fubini's theorem to $$int_{-infty}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x) , mathbf{1}_{{x leqslant -y }}mathbf{1}_{{x leqslant 0 }}, mathbf{1}_{{y geqslant 0 }},dx , dy$$
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 14 at 21:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why does $$int_{0}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{-y} f(x)mathrm dx mathrm dy Rightarrow int_{-infty}^{0} int_{0}^{-x} f(x) mathrm dy mathrm dx$$
The title is pretty self explanatory. I couldn't see how to properly change the order of the left integeral to the right one.
I'd love to hear your thoughts, thanks.
integration multivariable-calculus change-of-variable
$endgroup$
Why does $$int_{0}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{-y} f(x)mathrm dx mathrm dy Rightarrow int_{-infty}^{0} int_{0}^{-x} f(x) mathrm dy mathrm dx$$
The title is pretty self explanatory. I couldn't see how to properly change the order of the left integeral to the right one.
I'd love to hear your thoughts, thanks.
integration multivariable-calculus change-of-variable
integration multivariable-calculus change-of-variable
edited Jan 14 at 21:44
Zacky
7,89511062
7,89511062
asked Jan 14 at 21:33
superuser123superuser123
48628
48628
1
$begingroup$
Have you tried drawing the region?
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
Jan 14 at 21:36
1
$begingroup$
The first thing that comes to mind is Paul's Online Math Notes. They're very good at explaining double integrals over general regions. tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/DIGeneralRegion.aspx
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
Jan 14 at 21:46
1
$begingroup$
Apply Fubini's theorem to $$int_{-infty}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x) , mathbf{1}_{{x leqslant -y }}mathbf{1}_{{x leqslant 0 }}, mathbf{1}_{{y geqslant 0 }},dx , dy$$
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 14 at 21:57
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Have you tried drawing the region?
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
Jan 14 at 21:36
1
$begingroup$
The first thing that comes to mind is Paul's Online Math Notes. They're very good at explaining double integrals over general regions. tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/DIGeneralRegion.aspx
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
Jan 14 at 21:46
1
$begingroup$
Apply Fubini's theorem to $$int_{-infty}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x) , mathbf{1}_{{x leqslant -y }}mathbf{1}_{{x leqslant 0 }}, mathbf{1}_{{y geqslant 0 }},dx , dy$$
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 14 at 21:57
1
1
$begingroup$
Have you tried drawing the region?
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
Jan 14 at 21:36
$begingroup$
Have you tried drawing the region?
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
Jan 14 at 21:36
1
1
$begingroup$
The first thing that comes to mind is Paul's Online Math Notes. They're very good at explaining double integrals over general regions. tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/DIGeneralRegion.aspx
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
Jan 14 at 21:46
$begingroup$
The first thing that comes to mind is Paul's Online Math Notes. They're very good at explaining double integrals over general regions. tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/DIGeneralRegion.aspx
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
Jan 14 at 21:46
1
1
$begingroup$
Apply Fubini's theorem to $$int_{-infty}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x) , mathbf{1}_{{x leqslant -y }}mathbf{1}_{{x leqslant 0 }}, mathbf{1}_{{y geqslant 0 }},dx , dy$$
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 14 at 21:57
$begingroup$
Apply Fubini's theorem to $$int_{-infty}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x) , mathbf{1}_{{x leqslant -y }}mathbf{1}_{{x leqslant 0 }}, mathbf{1}_{{y geqslant 0 }},dx , dy$$
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 14 at 21:57
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The easiest way to perform a change of the order of integration in the multivariable setting is via Iverson's bracket. This is the indicator function such that $$[P] =begin{cases} 1 & P text{ is true}\
0 & text{else}.end{cases}$$ The change of variable arises from reinterpreting the system of inequalities (see below).
With the Iverson notation, one can remove the boundaries from the integral and implement it in the integrand, i.e.,
$$int_{0}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{-y} f(x,y)dx ,dy =iint_{mathbb{R}^2} f(x,y)Bigl[(ygeq 0) text{ and } (xleq-y) Bigr]dx, dy ,.$$
Now in order to perform the change of the order of integration, you have to reinterpret Iverson's bracket. You have to figure out what condition $$P=(ygeq0) text{ and } (xleq-y)$$ poses on $x$ first.
The maximal value that $x$ can achieve is $0$ (when $y=0$). The second condition in $P$ is equivalent to
$$ x leq -y Leftrightarrow y leq -x ,.$$
The first condition demands that $y>0$. Together, we have that
lf that $P$ is equivalent to
$$ P Leftrightarrow (x<0) text{ and } (0 < y < -x ),.$$
So we find
$$int_{0}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{-y} f(x,y)dx, dy =iint_{mathbb{R}^2} f(x,y)Bigl[(x<0) text{ and } (0 < y < -x )Bigr]dx ,dy = int_{-infty}^0 int_{0}^{-x} f(x,y) ,dy,dx ,.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The inequalities given with the first double integral are $0leq y leq infty$ and $-infty leq x leq -y$.
If you plot the funtions and the regions you get the region:
As you can see, if you we let the $x$ be constant limits instead of $y$ the same region can be defined as $-infty leq x leq 0$ and $0leq y leq -x$. Which gives you the bounds in your question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073785%2fchanging-order-of-integration-int-0-infty-int-infty-yfx-mathrm-dx-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The easiest way to perform a change of the order of integration in the multivariable setting is via Iverson's bracket. This is the indicator function such that $$[P] =begin{cases} 1 & P text{ is true}\
0 & text{else}.end{cases}$$ The change of variable arises from reinterpreting the system of inequalities (see below).
With the Iverson notation, one can remove the boundaries from the integral and implement it in the integrand, i.e.,
$$int_{0}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{-y} f(x,y)dx ,dy =iint_{mathbb{R}^2} f(x,y)Bigl[(ygeq 0) text{ and } (xleq-y) Bigr]dx, dy ,.$$
Now in order to perform the change of the order of integration, you have to reinterpret Iverson's bracket. You have to figure out what condition $$P=(ygeq0) text{ and } (xleq-y)$$ poses on $x$ first.
The maximal value that $x$ can achieve is $0$ (when $y=0$). The second condition in $P$ is equivalent to
$$ x leq -y Leftrightarrow y leq -x ,.$$
The first condition demands that $y>0$. Together, we have that
lf that $P$ is equivalent to
$$ P Leftrightarrow (x<0) text{ and } (0 < y < -x ),.$$
So we find
$$int_{0}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{-y} f(x,y)dx, dy =iint_{mathbb{R}^2} f(x,y)Bigl[(x<0) text{ and } (0 < y < -x )Bigr]dx ,dy = int_{-infty}^0 int_{0}^{-x} f(x,y) ,dy,dx ,.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The easiest way to perform a change of the order of integration in the multivariable setting is via Iverson's bracket. This is the indicator function such that $$[P] =begin{cases} 1 & P text{ is true}\
0 & text{else}.end{cases}$$ The change of variable arises from reinterpreting the system of inequalities (see below).
With the Iverson notation, one can remove the boundaries from the integral and implement it in the integrand, i.e.,
$$int_{0}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{-y} f(x,y)dx ,dy =iint_{mathbb{R}^2} f(x,y)Bigl[(ygeq 0) text{ and } (xleq-y) Bigr]dx, dy ,.$$
Now in order to perform the change of the order of integration, you have to reinterpret Iverson's bracket. You have to figure out what condition $$P=(ygeq0) text{ and } (xleq-y)$$ poses on $x$ first.
The maximal value that $x$ can achieve is $0$ (when $y=0$). The second condition in $P$ is equivalent to
$$ x leq -y Leftrightarrow y leq -x ,.$$
The first condition demands that $y>0$. Together, we have that
lf that $P$ is equivalent to
$$ P Leftrightarrow (x<0) text{ and } (0 < y < -x ),.$$
So we find
$$int_{0}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{-y} f(x,y)dx, dy =iint_{mathbb{R}^2} f(x,y)Bigl[(x<0) text{ and } (0 < y < -x )Bigr]dx ,dy = int_{-infty}^0 int_{0}^{-x} f(x,y) ,dy,dx ,.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The easiest way to perform a change of the order of integration in the multivariable setting is via Iverson's bracket. This is the indicator function such that $$[P] =begin{cases} 1 & P text{ is true}\
0 & text{else}.end{cases}$$ The change of variable arises from reinterpreting the system of inequalities (see below).
With the Iverson notation, one can remove the boundaries from the integral and implement it in the integrand, i.e.,
$$int_{0}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{-y} f(x,y)dx ,dy =iint_{mathbb{R}^2} f(x,y)Bigl[(ygeq 0) text{ and } (xleq-y) Bigr]dx, dy ,.$$
Now in order to perform the change of the order of integration, you have to reinterpret Iverson's bracket. You have to figure out what condition $$P=(ygeq0) text{ and } (xleq-y)$$ poses on $x$ first.
The maximal value that $x$ can achieve is $0$ (when $y=0$). The second condition in $P$ is equivalent to
$$ x leq -y Leftrightarrow y leq -x ,.$$
The first condition demands that $y>0$. Together, we have that
lf that $P$ is equivalent to
$$ P Leftrightarrow (x<0) text{ and } (0 < y < -x ),.$$
So we find
$$int_{0}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{-y} f(x,y)dx, dy =iint_{mathbb{R}^2} f(x,y)Bigl[(x<0) text{ and } (0 < y < -x )Bigr]dx ,dy = int_{-infty}^0 int_{0}^{-x} f(x,y) ,dy,dx ,.$$
$endgroup$
The easiest way to perform a change of the order of integration in the multivariable setting is via Iverson's bracket. This is the indicator function such that $$[P] =begin{cases} 1 & P text{ is true}\
0 & text{else}.end{cases}$$ The change of variable arises from reinterpreting the system of inequalities (see below).
With the Iverson notation, one can remove the boundaries from the integral and implement it in the integrand, i.e.,
$$int_{0}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{-y} f(x,y)dx ,dy =iint_{mathbb{R}^2} f(x,y)Bigl[(ygeq 0) text{ and } (xleq-y) Bigr]dx, dy ,.$$
Now in order to perform the change of the order of integration, you have to reinterpret Iverson's bracket. You have to figure out what condition $$P=(ygeq0) text{ and } (xleq-y)$$ poses on $x$ first.
The maximal value that $x$ can achieve is $0$ (when $y=0$). The second condition in $P$ is equivalent to
$$ x leq -y Leftrightarrow y leq -x ,.$$
The first condition demands that $y>0$. Together, we have that
lf that $P$ is equivalent to
$$ P Leftrightarrow (x<0) text{ and } (0 < y < -x ),.$$
So we find
$$int_{0}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{-y} f(x,y)dx, dy =iint_{mathbb{R}^2} f(x,y)Bigl[(x<0) text{ and } (0 < y < -x )Bigr]dx ,dy = int_{-infty}^0 int_{0}^{-x} f(x,y) ,dy,dx ,.$$
answered Jan 14 at 22:00
FabianFabian
20k3774
20k3774
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The inequalities given with the first double integral are $0leq y leq infty$ and $-infty leq x leq -y$.
If you plot the funtions and the regions you get the region:
As you can see, if you we let the $x$ be constant limits instead of $y$ the same region can be defined as $-infty leq x leq 0$ and $0leq y leq -x$. Which gives you the bounds in your question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The inequalities given with the first double integral are $0leq y leq infty$ and $-infty leq x leq -y$.
If you plot the funtions and the regions you get the region:
As you can see, if you we let the $x$ be constant limits instead of $y$ the same region can be defined as $-infty leq x leq 0$ and $0leq y leq -x$. Which gives you the bounds in your question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The inequalities given with the first double integral are $0leq y leq infty$ and $-infty leq x leq -y$.
If you plot the funtions and the regions you get the region:
As you can see, if you we let the $x$ be constant limits instead of $y$ the same region can be defined as $-infty leq x leq 0$ and $0leq y leq -x$. Which gives you the bounds in your question.
$endgroup$
The inequalities given with the first double integral are $0leq y leq infty$ and $-infty leq x leq -y$.
If you plot the funtions and the regions you get the region:
As you can see, if you we let the $x$ be constant limits instead of $y$ the same region can be defined as $-infty leq x leq 0$ and $0leq y leq -x$. Which gives you the bounds in your question.
answered Jan 14 at 22:45
Tom HimlerTom Himler
945314
945314
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073785%2fchanging-order-of-integration-int-0-infty-int-infty-yfx-mathrm-dx-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Have you tried drawing the region?
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
Jan 14 at 21:36
1
$begingroup$
The first thing that comes to mind is Paul's Online Math Notes. They're very good at explaining double integrals over general regions. tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcIII/DIGeneralRegion.aspx
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
Jan 14 at 21:46
1
$begingroup$
Apply Fubini's theorem to $$int_{-infty}^{infty} int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x) , mathbf{1}_{{x leqslant -y }}mathbf{1}_{{x leqslant 0 }}, mathbf{1}_{{y geqslant 0 }},dx , dy$$
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 14 at 21:57