How different is compiling source code in Debian GNU/Hurd from Debian GNU/Linux?
I was trying to compile libnetfilter_conntrack source from github as it was requested by iptables while compiling iptables and as any of these were not available in the HURD software repo and ended up in an error while configuring libnetfilter_conntrack
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... no
checking whether ln -s works... yes
configure: error: Linux only, dude!
and my kernel is,
$ uname -a
GNU debian 0.9 GNU-Mach 1.8+git20190109-486/Hurd-0.9 i686-AT386 GNU
and my ultimate goal was to compile iproute2.
debian compiling c hurd
asked Feb 5 at 9:48
Pavel SayekatPavel Sayekat
260413
add a comment |
I was trying to compile libnetfilter_conntrack source from github as it was requested by iptables while compiling iptables and as any of these were not available in the HURD software repo and ended up in an error while configuring libnetfilter_conntrack
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... no
checking whether ln -s works... yes
configure: error: Linux only, dude!
and my kernel is,
$ uname -a
GNU debian 0.9 GNU-Mach 1.8+git20190109-486/Hurd-0.9 i686-AT386 GNU
and my ultimate goal was to compile iproute2.
debian compiling c hurd
asked Feb 5 at 9:48
Pavel SayekatPavel Sayekat
260413
10
The matter here is not the difference between compiling on Hurd and Linux: Is that you are trying to compile a Linux-only firewall and lib on another OS.
– nwildner
Feb 5 at 11:19
1
Perhaps what you are looking for is a new program on the GNU/Hurd whose command-line interface is similar to that of the programsiptablesandiproute2. This may be possible as the networks (IPv4 and IPv6) that are being configured are similar. In that case look at the source of the equivalent programs on the GNU/Hurd and write a new command-line interface for them.
– Kapil
Feb 5 at 17:16
add a comment |
I was trying to compile libnetfilter_conntrack source from github as it was requested by iptables while compiling iptables and as any of these were not available in the HURD software repo and ended up in an error while configuring libnetfilter_conntrack
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... no
checking whether ln -s works... yes
configure: error: Linux only, dude!
and my kernel is,
$ uname -a
GNU debian 0.9 GNU-Mach 1.8+git20190109-486/Hurd-0.9 i686-AT386 GNU
and my ultimate goal was to compile iproute2.
debian compiling c hurd
asked Feb 5 at 9:48
Pavel SayekatPavel Sayekat
260413
I was trying to compile libnetfilter_conntrack source from github as it was requested by iptables while compiling iptables and as any of these were not available in the HURD software repo and ended up in an error while configuring libnetfilter_conntrack
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... no
checking whether ln -s works... yes
configure: error: Linux only, dude!
and my kernel is,
$ uname -a
GNU debian 0.9 GNU-Mach 1.8+git20190109-486/Hurd-0.9 i686-AT386 GNU
and my ultimate goal was to compile iproute2.
debian compiling c hurd
debian compiling c hurd
asked Feb 5 at 9:48
Pavel SayekatPavel Sayekat
260413
asked Feb 5 at 9:48
Pavel SayekatPavel Sayekat
260413
edited Feb 7 at 5:30
Pavel Sayekat
asked Feb 5 at 9:48
Pavel SayekatPavel Sayekat
260413
asked Feb 5 at 9:48
Pavel SayekatPavel Sayekat
260413
asked Feb 5 at 9:48
Pavel SayekatPavel Sayekat
260413
260413
10
The matter here is not the difference between compiling on Hurd and Linux: Is that you are trying to compile a Linux-only firewall and lib on another OS.
– nwildner
Feb 5 at 11:19
1
Perhaps what you are looking for is a new program on the GNU/Hurd whose command-line interface is similar to that of the programsiptablesandiproute2. This may be possible as the networks (IPv4 and IPv6) that are being configured are similar. In that case look at the source of the equivalent programs on the GNU/Hurd and write a new command-line interface for them.
– Kapil
Feb 5 at 17:16
add a comment |
10
The matter here is not the difference between compiling on Hurd and Linux: Is that you are trying to compile a Linux-only firewall and lib on another OS.
– nwildner
Feb 5 at 11:19
1
Perhaps what you are looking for is a new program on the GNU/Hurd whose command-line interface is similar to that of the programsiptablesandiproute2. This may be possible as the networks (IPv4 and IPv6) that are being configured are similar. In that case look at the source of the equivalent programs on the GNU/Hurd and write a new command-line interface for them.
– Kapil
Feb 5 at 17:16
10
10
The matter here is not the difference between compiling on Hurd and Linux: Is that you are trying to compile a Linux-only firewall and lib on another OS.
– nwildner
Feb 5 at 11:19
The matter here is not the difference between compiling on Hurd and Linux: Is that you are trying to compile a Linux-only firewall and lib on another OS.
– nwildner
Feb 5 at 11:19
1
1
Perhaps what you are looking for is a new program on the GNU/Hurd whose command-line interface is similar to that of the programs
iptables and iproute2. This may be possible as the networks (IPv4 and IPv6) that are being configured are similar. In that case look at the source of the equivalent programs on the GNU/Hurd and write a new command-line interface for them.– Kapil
Feb 5 at 17:16
Perhaps what you are looking for is a new program on the GNU/Hurd whose command-line interface is similar to that of the programs
iptables and iproute2. This may be possible as the networks (IPv4 and IPv6) that are being configured are similar. In that case look at the source of the equivalent programs on the GNU/Hurd and write a new command-line interface for them.– Kapil
Feb 5 at 17:16
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
In general, it’s not very different; there are lists of known pitfalls on the Hurd’s site and on the Debian wiki. Many projects build fine, or after a few fixes (the most common issue being the absence of PATH_MAX).
However in your case you’ll find it difficult to get anywhere: netfilter and iptables are specific to the Linux kernel, so you won’t be able to use them on the Hurd. You’ll probably have noticed that the iptables package isn’t available on hurd-i386 — there’s usually a good reason for that... iproute2 is also Linux-specific.
On the Hurd you’d use eth-filter instead, see the networking section of the Debian GNU/Hurd configuration guide for details.
answered Feb 5 at 9:53
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
178k24403481
12
@PavelSayekat Using a firewall not specifically written for Linux?
– Kusalananda♦
Feb 5 at 9:59
5
@PavelSayekat You can always port the libraries/programs to hurd. Happy coding for the next few years!
– Giacomo Alzetta
Feb 5 at 13:34
1
@GiacomoAlzetta won’t work, because the libraries and programs are just the userspace half of the implementation; they talk to specific Linux kernel modules, so this won’t ever be possible.
– mirabilos
Feb 5 at 16:33
4
@mirabilos unless someone adds “kernel” support on the Hurd too ;-).
– Stephen Kitt
Feb 5 at 16:35
1
@mirabilos I know, which is why I put the term “kernel” in quotes. And yes, portingiptableswould be rather pointless, it’s already in the past...
– Stephen Kitt
Feb 5 at 16:46
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f498767%2fhow-different-is-compiling-source-code-in-debian-gnu-hurd-from-debian-gnu-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In general, it’s not very different; there are lists of known pitfalls on the Hurd’s site and on the Debian wiki. Many projects build fine, or after a few fixes (the most common issue being the absence of PATH_MAX).
However in your case you’ll find it difficult to get anywhere: netfilter and iptables are specific to the Linux kernel, so you won’t be able to use them on the Hurd. You’ll probably have noticed that the iptables package isn’t available on hurd-i386 — there’s usually a good reason for that... iproute2 is also Linux-specific.
On the Hurd you’d use eth-filter instead, see the networking section of the Debian GNU/Hurd configuration guide for details.
answered Feb 5 at 9:53
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
178k24403481
12
@PavelSayekat Using a firewall not specifically written for Linux?
– Kusalananda♦
Feb 5 at 9:59
5
@PavelSayekat You can always port the libraries/programs to hurd. Happy coding for the next few years!
– Giacomo Alzetta
Feb 5 at 13:34
1
@GiacomoAlzetta won’t work, because the libraries and programs are just the userspace half of the implementation; they talk to specific Linux kernel modules, so this won’t ever be possible.
– mirabilos
Feb 5 at 16:33
4
@mirabilos unless someone adds “kernel” support on the Hurd too ;-).
– Stephen Kitt
Feb 5 at 16:35
1
@mirabilos I know, which is why I put the term “kernel” in quotes. And yes, portingiptableswould be rather pointless, it’s already in the past...
– Stephen Kitt
Feb 5 at 16:46
|
show 1 more comment
In general, it’s not very different; there are lists of known pitfalls on the Hurd’s site and on the Debian wiki. Many projects build fine, or after a few fixes (the most common issue being the absence of PATH_MAX).
However in your case you’ll find it difficult to get anywhere: netfilter and iptables are specific to the Linux kernel, so you won’t be able to use them on the Hurd. You’ll probably have noticed that the iptables package isn’t available on hurd-i386 — there’s usually a good reason for that... iproute2 is also Linux-specific.
On the Hurd you’d use eth-filter instead, see the networking section of the Debian GNU/Hurd configuration guide for details.
answered Feb 5 at 9:53
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
178k24403481
12
@PavelSayekat Using a firewall not specifically written for Linux?
– Kusalananda♦
Feb 5 at 9:59
5
@PavelSayekat You can always port the libraries/programs to hurd. Happy coding for the next few years!
– Giacomo Alzetta
Feb 5 at 13:34
1
@GiacomoAlzetta won’t work, because the libraries and programs are just the userspace half of the implementation; they talk to specific Linux kernel modules, so this won’t ever be possible.
– mirabilos
Feb 5 at 16:33
4
@mirabilos unless someone adds “kernel” support on the Hurd too ;-).
– Stephen Kitt
Feb 5 at 16:35
1
@mirabilos I know, which is why I put the term “kernel” in quotes. And yes, portingiptableswould be rather pointless, it’s already in the past...
– Stephen Kitt
Feb 5 at 16:46
|
show 1 more comment
In general, it’s not very different; there are lists of known pitfalls on the Hurd’s site and on the Debian wiki. Many projects build fine, or after a few fixes (the most common issue being the absence of PATH_MAX).
However in your case you’ll find it difficult to get anywhere: netfilter and iptables are specific to the Linux kernel, so you won’t be able to use them on the Hurd. You’ll probably have noticed that the iptables package isn’t available on hurd-i386 — there’s usually a good reason for that... iproute2 is also Linux-specific.
On the Hurd you’d use eth-filter instead, see the networking section of the Debian GNU/Hurd configuration guide for details.
answered Feb 5 at 9:53
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
178k24403481
In general, it’s not very different; there are lists of known pitfalls on the Hurd’s site and on the Debian wiki. Many projects build fine, or after a few fixes (the most common issue being the absence of PATH_MAX).
However in your case you’ll find it difficult to get anywhere: netfilter and iptables are specific to the Linux kernel, so you won’t be able to use them on the Hurd. You’ll probably have noticed that the iptables package isn’t available on hurd-i386 — there’s usually a good reason for that... iproute2 is also Linux-specific.
On the Hurd you’d use eth-filter instead, see the networking section of the Debian GNU/Hurd configuration guide for details.
answered Feb 5 at 9:53
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
178k24403481
edited Feb 5 at 17:47
answered Feb 5 at 9:53
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
178k24403481
answered Feb 5 at 9:53
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
178k24403481
answered Feb 5 at 9:53
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
178k24403481
178k24403481
12
@PavelSayekat Using a firewall not specifically written for Linux?
– Kusalananda♦
Feb 5 at 9:59
5
@PavelSayekat You can always port the libraries/programs to hurd. Happy coding for the next few years!
– Giacomo Alzetta
Feb 5 at 13:34
1
@GiacomoAlzetta won’t work, because the libraries and programs are just the userspace half of the implementation; they talk to specific Linux kernel modules, so this won’t ever be possible.
– mirabilos
Feb 5 at 16:33
4
@mirabilos unless someone adds “kernel” support on the Hurd too ;-).
– Stephen Kitt
Feb 5 at 16:35
1
@mirabilos I know, which is why I put the term “kernel” in quotes. And yes, portingiptableswould be rather pointless, it’s already in the past...
– Stephen Kitt
Feb 5 at 16:46
|
show 1 more comment
12
@PavelSayekat Using a firewall not specifically written for Linux?
– Kusalananda♦
Feb 5 at 9:59
5
@PavelSayekat You can always port the libraries/programs to hurd. Happy coding for the next few years!
– Giacomo Alzetta
Feb 5 at 13:34
1
@GiacomoAlzetta won’t work, because the libraries and programs are just the userspace half of the implementation; they talk to specific Linux kernel modules, so this won’t ever be possible.
– mirabilos
Feb 5 at 16:33
4
@mirabilos unless someone adds “kernel” support on the Hurd too ;-).
– Stephen Kitt
Feb 5 at 16:35
1
@mirabilos I know, which is why I put the term “kernel” in quotes. And yes, portingiptableswould be rather pointless, it’s already in the past...
– Stephen Kitt
Feb 5 at 16:46
12
12
@PavelSayekat Using a firewall not specifically written for Linux?
– Kusalananda♦
Feb 5 at 9:59
@PavelSayekat Using a firewall not specifically written for Linux?
– Kusalananda♦
Feb 5 at 9:59
5
5
@PavelSayekat You can always port the libraries/programs to hurd. Happy coding for the next few years!
– Giacomo Alzetta
Feb 5 at 13:34
@PavelSayekat You can always port the libraries/programs to hurd. Happy coding for the next few years!
– Giacomo Alzetta
Feb 5 at 13:34
1
1
@GiacomoAlzetta won’t work, because the libraries and programs are just the userspace half of the implementation; they talk to specific Linux kernel modules, so this won’t ever be possible.
– mirabilos
Feb 5 at 16:33
@GiacomoAlzetta won’t work, because the libraries and programs are just the userspace half of the implementation; they talk to specific Linux kernel modules, so this won’t ever be possible.
– mirabilos
Feb 5 at 16:33
4
4
@mirabilos unless someone adds “kernel” support on the Hurd too ;-).
– Stephen Kitt
Feb 5 at 16:35
@mirabilos unless someone adds “kernel” support on the Hurd too ;-).
– Stephen Kitt
Feb 5 at 16:35
1
1
@mirabilos I know, which is why I put the term “kernel” in quotes. And yes, porting
iptables would be rather pointless, it’s already in the past...– Stephen Kitt
Feb 5 at 16:46
@mirabilos I know, which is why I put the term “kernel” in quotes. And yes, porting
iptables would be rather pointless, it’s already in the past...– Stephen Kitt
Feb 5 at 16:46
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f498767%2fhow-different-is-compiling-source-code-in-debian-gnu-hurd-from-debian-gnu-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
10
The matter here is not the difference between compiling on Hurd and Linux: Is that you are trying to compile a Linux-only firewall and lib on another OS.
– nwildner
Feb 5 at 11:19
1
Perhaps what you are looking for is a new program on the GNU/Hurd whose command-line interface is similar to that of the programs
iptablesandiproute2. This may be possible as the networks (IPv4 and IPv6) that are being configured are similar. In that case look at the source of the equivalent programs on the GNU/Hurd and write a new command-line interface for them.– Kapil
Feb 5 at 17:16