Verification on proof of $sigma(kU)=k^{2n+1}sigma(U)$?












1












$begingroup$


Let $U$ be a bounded open subset of an $n$-dimensional euclidean space endowed with the usual topology and the usual metric $d$. Now, let



$$sigma(U)=iint_U d(x,y)dxdy$$



Suppose we scale the space by a factor of $k$ from the origin. Let $k U$ be the new shape.



I think I have a proof of $sigma(kU)=k^{2n+1}sigma(U)$, but I don't feel confortable with it, as it seems too easy. Anyway, here is the proof:




Each of its points of $U$ will have coordinates $x=(x_1,ldots,x_n)$. Then the new shape $kU$ will have points with coordinates $x'=(x_1',ldots,x_n')$ with the relations



$$x_i'=kx_i$$



$$dx_i'=kdx_i$$



Then, because $x_i=x_i'/k$, the shape $kU$ gets transformed to ${xmid exists x'in kU:x'=kx}=U$:



begin{align}
sigma(kU) &= iint_{kU}d(x',y')dx'dy' \
&= iint_U d(kx,ky)kdx kdy \
&= int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}cdotsint_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_1^0}^{y_1^1}cdotsint_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1} sqrt{(kx_1-ky_1)^2+cdots+(kx_n-ky_n)^2}kdx_1ldots kdx_nkdy_1ldots kdy_n \
&= int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}cdotsint_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_1^0}^{y_1^1}cdotsint_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1} ksqrt{(x_1-y_1)^2+cdots+(x_n-y_n)^2}k^{2n}dx_1ldots dx_ndy_1ldots dy_n \
&= k^{2n+1}int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}cdotsint_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_1^0}^{y_1^1}cdotsint_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1} sqrt{(x_1-y_1)^2+cdots+(x_n-y_n)^2}dx_1ldots dx_ndy_1ldots dy_n \
&= k^{2n+1}iint_Ud(x,y)dxdy \
sigma(kU)&= k^{2n+1}sigma(U)
end{align}



Is this correct? Thanks.






calculus proof-verification metric-spaces







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let $U$ be a bounded open subset of an $n$-dimensional euclidean space endowed with the usual topology and the usual metric $d$. Now, let



    $$sigma(U)=iint_U d(x,y)dxdy$$



    Suppose we scale the space by a factor of $k$ from the origin. Let $k U$ be the new shape.



    I think I have a proof of $sigma(kU)=k^{2n+1}sigma(U)$, but I don't feel confortable with it, as it seems too easy. Anyway, here is the proof:




    Each of its points of $U$ will have coordinates $x=(x_1,ldots,x_n)$. Then the new shape $kU$ will have points with coordinates $x'=(x_1',ldots,x_n')$ with the relations



    $$x_i'=kx_i$$



    $$dx_i'=kdx_i$$



    Then, because $x_i=x_i'/k$, the shape $kU$ gets transformed to ${xmid exists x'in kU:x'=kx}=U$:



    begin{align}
    sigma(kU) &= iint_{kU}d(x',y')dx'dy' \
    &= iint_U d(kx,ky)kdx kdy \
    &= int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}cdotsint_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_1^0}^{y_1^1}cdotsint_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1} sqrt{(kx_1-ky_1)^2+cdots+(kx_n-ky_n)^2}kdx_1ldots kdx_nkdy_1ldots kdy_n \
    &= int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}cdotsint_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_1^0}^{y_1^1}cdotsint_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1} ksqrt{(x_1-y_1)^2+cdots+(x_n-y_n)^2}k^{2n}dx_1ldots dx_ndy_1ldots dy_n \
    &= k^{2n+1}int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}cdotsint_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_1^0}^{y_1^1}cdotsint_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1} sqrt{(x_1-y_1)^2+cdots+(x_n-y_n)^2}dx_1ldots dx_ndy_1ldots dy_n \
    &= k^{2n+1}iint_Ud(x,y)dxdy \
    sigma(kU)&= k^{2n+1}sigma(U)
    end{align}



    Is this correct? Thanks.






    calculus proof-verification metric-spaces







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let $U$ be a bounded open subset of an $n$-dimensional euclidean space endowed with the usual topology and the usual metric $d$. Now, let



      $$sigma(U)=iint_U d(x,y)dxdy$$



      Suppose we scale the space by a factor of $k$ from the origin. Let $k U$ be the new shape.



      I think I have a proof of $sigma(kU)=k^{2n+1}sigma(U)$, but I don't feel confortable with it, as it seems too easy. Anyway, here is the proof:




      Each of its points of $U$ will have coordinates $x=(x_1,ldots,x_n)$. Then the new shape $kU$ will have points with coordinates $x'=(x_1',ldots,x_n')$ with the relations



      $$x_i'=kx_i$$



      $$dx_i'=kdx_i$$



      Then, because $x_i=x_i'/k$, the shape $kU$ gets transformed to ${xmid exists x'in kU:x'=kx}=U$:



      begin{align}
      sigma(kU) &= iint_{kU}d(x',y')dx'dy' \
      &= iint_U d(kx,ky)kdx kdy \
      &= int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}cdotsint_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_1^0}^{y_1^1}cdotsint_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1} sqrt{(kx_1-ky_1)^2+cdots+(kx_n-ky_n)^2}kdx_1ldots kdx_nkdy_1ldots kdy_n \
      &= int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}cdotsint_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_1^0}^{y_1^1}cdotsint_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1} ksqrt{(x_1-y_1)^2+cdots+(x_n-y_n)^2}k^{2n}dx_1ldots dx_ndy_1ldots dy_n \
      &= k^{2n+1}int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}cdotsint_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_1^0}^{y_1^1}cdotsint_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1} sqrt{(x_1-y_1)^2+cdots+(x_n-y_n)^2}dx_1ldots dx_ndy_1ldots dy_n \
      &= k^{2n+1}iint_Ud(x,y)dxdy \
      sigma(kU)&= k^{2n+1}sigma(U)
      end{align}



      Is this correct? Thanks.






      calculus proof-verification metric-spaces







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $U$ be a bounded open subset of an $n$-dimensional euclidean space endowed with the usual topology and the usual metric $d$. Now, let



      $$sigma(U)=iint_U d(x,y)dxdy$$



      Suppose we scale the space by a factor of $k$ from the origin. Let $k U$ be the new shape.



      I think I have a proof of $sigma(kU)=k^{2n+1}sigma(U)$, but I don't feel confortable with it, as it seems too easy. Anyway, here is the proof:




      Each of its points of $U$ will have coordinates $x=(x_1,ldots,x_n)$. Then the new shape $kU$ will have points with coordinates $x'=(x_1',ldots,x_n')$ with the relations



      $$x_i'=kx_i$$



      $$dx_i'=kdx_i$$



      Then, because $x_i=x_i'/k$, the shape $kU$ gets transformed to ${xmid exists x'in kU:x'=kx}=U$:



      begin{align}
      sigma(kU) &= iint_{kU}d(x',y')dx'dy' \
      &= iint_U d(kx,ky)kdx kdy \
      &= int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}cdotsint_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_1^0}^{y_1^1}cdotsint_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1} sqrt{(kx_1-ky_1)^2+cdots+(kx_n-ky_n)^2}kdx_1ldots kdx_nkdy_1ldots kdy_n \
      &= int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}cdotsint_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_1^0}^{y_1^1}cdotsint_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1} ksqrt{(x_1-y_1)^2+cdots+(x_n-y_n)^2}k^{2n}dx_1ldots dx_ndy_1ldots dy_n \
      &= k^{2n+1}int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}cdotsint_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_1^0}^{y_1^1}cdotsint_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1} sqrt{(x_1-y_1)^2+cdots+(x_n-y_n)^2}dx_1ldots dx_ndy_1ldots dy_n \
      &= k^{2n+1}iint_Ud(x,y)dxdy \
      sigma(kU)&= k^{2n+1}sigma(U)
      end{align}



      Is this correct? Thanks.






      calculus proof-verification metric-spaces




      calculus proof-verification metric-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 15 at 0:10







      Garmekain

















      asked Jan 14 at 21:25









      GarmekainGarmekain

      1,502720




      1,502720






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          One thing : the shape $U$ can be pretty complicated so there's no reason it can be written as nicely as $$int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}...int_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_0^0}^{y_0^1}...int_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1}d(x,y),dx,dy.$$



          But that's fine because what you only need is that $d(kx,ky)=kd(x,y)$ for all $x,yin U$ (which is certainly true) and that $d(kx)d(ky)=k^{2n}dxdy$ which is true as well for the reason you mention.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073770%2fverification-on-proof-of-sigmaku-k2n1-sigmau%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            One thing : the shape $U$ can be pretty complicated so there's no reason it can be written as nicely as $$int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}...int_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_0^0}^{y_0^1}...int_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1}d(x,y),dx,dy.$$



            But that's fine because what you only need is that $d(kx,ky)=kd(x,y)$ for all $x,yin U$ (which is certainly true) and that $d(kx)d(ky)=k^{2n}dxdy$ which is true as well for the reason you mention.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              One thing : the shape $U$ can be pretty complicated so there's no reason it can be written as nicely as $$int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}...int_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_0^0}^{y_0^1}...int_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1}d(x,y),dx,dy.$$



              But that's fine because what you only need is that $d(kx,ky)=kd(x,y)$ for all $x,yin U$ (which is certainly true) and that $d(kx)d(ky)=k^{2n}dxdy$ which is true as well for the reason you mention.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                One thing : the shape $U$ can be pretty complicated so there's no reason it can be written as nicely as $$int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}...int_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_0^0}^{y_0^1}...int_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1}d(x,y),dx,dy.$$



                But that's fine because what you only need is that $d(kx,ky)=kd(x,y)$ for all $x,yin U$ (which is certainly true) and that $d(kx)d(ky)=k^{2n}dxdy$ which is true as well for the reason you mention.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                One thing : the shape $U$ can be pretty complicated so there's no reason it can be written as nicely as $$int_{x_1^0}^{x_1^1}...int_{x_n^0}^{x_n^1}int_{y_0^0}^{y_0^1}...int_{y_n^0}^{y_n^1}d(x,y),dx,dy.$$



                But that's fine because what you only need is that $d(kx,ky)=kd(x,y)$ for all $x,yin U$ (which is certainly true) and that $d(kx)d(ky)=k^{2n}dxdy$ which is true as well for the reason you mention.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 15 at 0:25









                AyoubAyoub

                33128




                33128






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073770%2fverification-on-proof-of-sigmaku-k2n1-sigmau%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Human spaceflight

                    Image
                    Human spaceflight From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search "Space traveler" redirects here. For other uses, see Space traveler (disambiguation). @media all and (max-width:720px){.mw-parser-output .tmulti>.thumbinner{width:100%!important;max-width:none!important}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .tsingle{float:none!important;max-width:none!important;width:100%!important;text-align:center}} Apollo 11 crewmember Buzz Aldrin on the Moon, 1969 International Space Station crewmember Tracy Caldwell Dyson views the Earth, 2010 Space Shuttle Discovery heads into space with a crew aboard, STS-121 in 2006 Inside a space suit on the Canadarm, 1993 Human spaceflight (also referred to as crewed spaceflight or manned spaceflight ) is space travel with a crew or passengers aboard the spacecraft. Spacecraft carrying people may be operated directly, by human crew, or it may be e
                    Read more

                    Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                    Image
                    0 1 What exactly does the error message beginning with E: mean? I assume it has to do with the file structure on Ubuntu-on-Windows, but what exactly? The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required: os-prober Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove it. The following extra packages will be installed: libxslt1.1 The following NEW packages will be installed: libxslt1.1 xmlstarlet 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 435 kB of archives. After this operation, 1023 kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main libxslt1.1 amd64 1.1.28-2build1 [145 kB] Get:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/universe xmlstarlet amd64 1.5.0-1 [290 kB]
                    Read more

                    張江高科駅

                    Image
                    張江高科駅 ちょうこうこうか Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park 所在地 中国上海市浦東新区 所属事業者 上海地鉄運営有限公司（上海軌道交通・駅詳細） 上海浦東現代有軌交通有限公司（駅詳細） テンプレートを表示 張江高科駅 各種表記 繁体字： 張江高科站 簡体字： 张江高科站 拼音 ： Zhàngjiāng Gāokē Zhàn 発音： ヂャンジャン ガオクー ヂャン 英文： Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Station テンプレートを表示 張江高科駅 （ちょうこうこうか-えき）は中華人民共和国上海市浦東新区に位置する、上海軌道交通2号線の駅である。 なお、張江高科駅前にある張江軌道電車の 張江地鉄駅駅 についてもここで述べる。 目次 1 利用可能な鉄道路線 2 沿革 3 駅構造 3.1 上海軌道交通 3.2 張江軌道電車 4 駅周辺 5 隣の駅 6 注釈 7 関連項目 利用可能な鉄道路線 上海軌道交通 ■ 2号線 上海浦東現代有軌交通有限公司 ■ 張江軌道電車 沿革 高架駅時代の姿 2000年12月27日 - 2号線の駅が高架駅として開業。 2010年 1月1日 - 張江軌道電車の開業に伴い、張江地鉄駅駅（停留所）を設置。 2月13日 - 駅地下化に伴い高架駅の運用停止。 2月24日 - 10日間の閉鎖を経て地下新駅の開業。 2017年2月9日 - リニューアル工事を経て再開業。乗降客の増加に対応し、ホームへのエレベーター、エスカレーターを増設、券売機エリアを拡張した [1] 。 駅構造 上海軌道交通 上海軌道交通 張江高科駅 5号口 ちょうこうこうか Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park ◄ 竜陽路 (2.60km) (1.61km) 金科路 ► 所在地 中国上海市浦東新区松涛路 祖冲之路 （中国語版） 北緯31度12分11秒 東経121度34分50秒  /  北緯31.2
                    Read more