tikz-3dplot causes problems to let operator












4















I am trying to use the 3d-plot library. The plan is to define some basic 2d coordinates at the beginning and then use them to define all kind of 3d points, using the "let" operator:



documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
begin{document}

tdplotsetmaincoords{0}{0} %doing nothing for now
begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(1,0,0);
draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(0,1,0); %just for reference

coordinate (A) at (1,1);
draw let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)--(x1,1,0); %this is problematic
draw[green] (1,1,0)--(28.45,1,0);
draw[blue] let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)--(x1,1);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


The problem is that the output does not make any sense:

-tikz seems to know how to draw point (1,1,0) (first point of green line).

-tikz seems to know that x1 of (A) equals 1 (blue line).

-tikz somehow multiplies x1 by ~28.45 for no apparent reason, when x1 is used inside 3d coordinates.

(note that experimenting with defining (A) to be 3d - i.e. (1,1,0) - changed nothing)



I find this problem fascinating, so I'd like it very much to wrap my head around it, but if someone has apart from it a solution on how to define a pair of numbers to use afterwards in tikz, behaving well with tikz-3dplot, I would also be interested



output










share|improve this question



























    4















    I am trying to use the 3d-plot library. The plan is to define some basic 2d coordinates at the beginning and then use them to define all kind of 3d points, using the "let" operator:



    documentclass{standalone}
    usepackage{tikz}
    usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
    usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
    begin{document}

    tdplotsetmaincoords{0}{0} %doing nothing for now
    begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
    draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(1,0,0);
    draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(0,1,0); %just for reference

    coordinate (A) at (1,1);
    draw let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)--(x1,1,0); %this is problematic
    draw[green] (1,1,0)--(28.45,1,0);
    draw[blue] let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)--(x1,1);
    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    The problem is that the output does not make any sense:

    -tikz seems to know how to draw point (1,1,0) (first point of green line).

    -tikz seems to know that x1 of (A) equals 1 (blue line).

    -tikz somehow multiplies x1 by ~28.45 for no apparent reason, when x1 is used inside 3d coordinates.

    (note that experimenting with defining (A) to be 3d - i.e. (1,1,0) - changed nothing)



    I find this problem fascinating, so I'd like it very much to wrap my head around it, but if someone has apart from it a solution on how to define a pair of numbers to use afterwards in tikz, behaving well with tikz-3dplot, I would also be interested



    output










    share|improve this question

























      4












      4








      4








      I am trying to use the 3d-plot library. The plan is to define some basic 2d coordinates at the beginning and then use them to define all kind of 3d points, using the "let" operator:



      documentclass{standalone}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
      usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
      begin{document}

      tdplotsetmaincoords{0}{0} %doing nothing for now
      begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
      draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(1,0,0);
      draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(0,1,0); %just for reference

      coordinate (A) at (1,1);
      draw let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)--(x1,1,0); %this is problematic
      draw[green] (1,1,0)--(28.45,1,0);
      draw[blue] let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)--(x1,1);
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}


      The problem is that the output does not make any sense:

      -tikz seems to know how to draw point (1,1,0) (first point of green line).

      -tikz seems to know that x1 of (A) equals 1 (blue line).

      -tikz somehow multiplies x1 by ~28.45 for no apparent reason, when x1 is used inside 3d coordinates.

      (note that experimenting with defining (A) to be 3d - i.e. (1,1,0) - changed nothing)



      I find this problem fascinating, so I'd like it very much to wrap my head around it, but if someone has apart from it a solution on how to define a pair of numbers to use afterwards in tikz, behaving well with tikz-3dplot, I would also be interested



      output










      share|improve this question














      I am trying to use the 3d-plot library. The plan is to define some basic 2d coordinates at the beginning and then use them to define all kind of 3d points, using the "let" operator:



      documentclass{standalone}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
      usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
      begin{document}

      tdplotsetmaincoords{0}{0} %doing nothing for now
      begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
      draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(1,0,0);
      draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(0,1,0); %just for reference

      coordinate (A) at (1,1);
      draw let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)--(x1,1,0); %this is problematic
      draw[green] (1,1,0)--(28.45,1,0);
      draw[blue] let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)--(x1,1);
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}


      The problem is that the output does not make any sense:

      -tikz seems to know how to draw point (1,1,0) (first point of green line).

      -tikz seems to know that x1 of (A) equals 1 (blue line).

      -tikz somehow multiplies x1 by ~28.45 for no apparent reason, when x1 is used inside 3d coordinates.

      (note that experimenting with defining (A) to be 3d - i.e. (1,1,0) - changed nothing)



      I find this problem fascinating, so I'd like it very much to wrap my head around it, but if someone has apart from it a solution on how to define a pair of numbers to use afterwards in tikz, behaving well with tikz-3dplot, I would also be interested



      output







      tikz-pgf coordinates tikz-3dplot






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Feb 10 at 2:24









      D. BogiokasD. Bogiokas

      305




      305






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          Welcome to TeX.SE! The let operator works still fine. The problem you are seeing is that the 3d coordinate system installed by tikz-3dplot tacitly works with cm units whereas the calc syntax yields pt. To see this more explicitly, let's look at the definition of tdplotsetmaincoords in tikz-3dplot.sty,



          newcommand{tdplotsetmaincoords}[2]{%
          %perform some trig for the display transformation
          %
          %
          %store the user-specified angles for possible future use
          pgfmathsetmacro{tdplotmaintheta}{#1}
          pgfmathsetmacro{tdplotmainphi}{#2}
          %
          %
          tdplotcalctransformmainscreen
          %
          %now here is where the output is performed
          tikzset{tdplot_main_coords/.style={x={(raarot cm,rbarot cm)},y={(rabrot cm, rbbrot cm)},z={(racrot cm, rbcrot cm)}}}%
          }


          Here, the coordinates get (unfortunately, one may perhaps add) multiplied by cm. (The macros racrot are just entries of the rotation matrix, i.e. an orthogonal 3x3 matrix parametrized in the conventions of the package.) I should, however, add that overall I love that package, so I am very far from criticizing the author. The more so since the problem can be fixed really easily.



          The arguably simplest fix is to convert back to cm by just dividing by 1cm/1pt.



          documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
          usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
          usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
          begin{document}

          tdplotsetmaincoords{0}{0} %doing nothing for now
          begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
          draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(1,0,0);
          draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(0,1,0); %just for reference

          coordinate (A) at (1,1);
          draw let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)--({x1*1pt/1cm},1,0); %this is problematic
          %draw[green] (1,1,0)--(28.45,1,0);
          draw[blue] let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)-- (x1,1);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • P.S. You might be interested in this commit.

            – marmot
            Feb 10 at 2:36











          • Perfect answer. Thank you very much. I knew I had seen this 28.sth before :) P.S. This coord thing seems indeed interesting, I will check it out.

            – D. Bogiokas
            Feb 10 at 2:45











          • @D.Bogiokas You're welcome! There are ideas to add the orthonormal transformations to the 3d library. However, if this happens, it won't happen tomorrow, and questions like this one will certainly greatly help to avoid some pitfalls.

            – marmot
            Feb 10 at 2:47












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474136%2ftikz-3dplot-causes-problems-to-let-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7














          Welcome to TeX.SE! The let operator works still fine. The problem you are seeing is that the 3d coordinate system installed by tikz-3dplot tacitly works with cm units whereas the calc syntax yields pt. To see this more explicitly, let's look at the definition of tdplotsetmaincoords in tikz-3dplot.sty,



          newcommand{tdplotsetmaincoords}[2]{%
          %perform some trig for the display transformation
          %
          %
          %store the user-specified angles for possible future use
          pgfmathsetmacro{tdplotmaintheta}{#1}
          pgfmathsetmacro{tdplotmainphi}{#2}
          %
          %
          tdplotcalctransformmainscreen
          %
          %now here is where the output is performed
          tikzset{tdplot_main_coords/.style={x={(raarot cm,rbarot cm)},y={(rabrot cm, rbbrot cm)},z={(racrot cm, rbcrot cm)}}}%
          }


          Here, the coordinates get (unfortunately, one may perhaps add) multiplied by cm. (The macros racrot are just entries of the rotation matrix, i.e. an orthogonal 3x3 matrix parametrized in the conventions of the package.) I should, however, add that overall I love that package, so I am very far from criticizing the author. The more so since the problem can be fixed really easily.



          The arguably simplest fix is to convert back to cm by just dividing by 1cm/1pt.



          documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
          usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
          usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
          begin{document}

          tdplotsetmaincoords{0}{0} %doing nothing for now
          begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
          draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(1,0,0);
          draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(0,1,0); %just for reference

          coordinate (A) at (1,1);
          draw let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)--({x1*1pt/1cm},1,0); %this is problematic
          %draw[green] (1,1,0)--(28.45,1,0);
          draw[blue] let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)-- (x1,1);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • P.S. You might be interested in this commit.

            – marmot
            Feb 10 at 2:36











          • Perfect answer. Thank you very much. I knew I had seen this 28.sth before :) P.S. This coord thing seems indeed interesting, I will check it out.

            – D. Bogiokas
            Feb 10 at 2:45











          • @D.Bogiokas You're welcome! There are ideas to add the orthonormal transformations to the 3d library. However, if this happens, it won't happen tomorrow, and questions like this one will certainly greatly help to avoid some pitfalls.

            – marmot
            Feb 10 at 2:47
















          7














          Welcome to TeX.SE! The let operator works still fine. The problem you are seeing is that the 3d coordinate system installed by tikz-3dplot tacitly works with cm units whereas the calc syntax yields pt. To see this more explicitly, let's look at the definition of tdplotsetmaincoords in tikz-3dplot.sty,



          newcommand{tdplotsetmaincoords}[2]{%
          %perform some trig for the display transformation
          %
          %
          %store the user-specified angles for possible future use
          pgfmathsetmacro{tdplotmaintheta}{#1}
          pgfmathsetmacro{tdplotmainphi}{#2}
          %
          %
          tdplotcalctransformmainscreen
          %
          %now here is where the output is performed
          tikzset{tdplot_main_coords/.style={x={(raarot cm,rbarot cm)},y={(rabrot cm, rbbrot cm)},z={(racrot cm, rbcrot cm)}}}%
          }


          Here, the coordinates get (unfortunately, one may perhaps add) multiplied by cm. (The macros racrot are just entries of the rotation matrix, i.e. an orthogonal 3x3 matrix parametrized in the conventions of the package.) I should, however, add that overall I love that package, so I am very far from criticizing the author. The more so since the problem can be fixed really easily.



          The arguably simplest fix is to convert back to cm by just dividing by 1cm/1pt.



          documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
          usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
          usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
          begin{document}

          tdplotsetmaincoords{0}{0} %doing nothing for now
          begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
          draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(1,0,0);
          draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(0,1,0); %just for reference

          coordinate (A) at (1,1);
          draw let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)--({x1*1pt/1cm},1,0); %this is problematic
          %draw[green] (1,1,0)--(28.45,1,0);
          draw[blue] let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)-- (x1,1);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • P.S. You might be interested in this commit.

            – marmot
            Feb 10 at 2:36











          • Perfect answer. Thank you very much. I knew I had seen this 28.sth before :) P.S. This coord thing seems indeed interesting, I will check it out.

            – D. Bogiokas
            Feb 10 at 2:45











          • @D.Bogiokas You're welcome! There are ideas to add the orthonormal transformations to the 3d library. However, if this happens, it won't happen tomorrow, and questions like this one will certainly greatly help to avoid some pitfalls.

            – marmot
            Feb 10 at 2:47














          7












          7








          7







          Welcome to TeX.SE! The let operator works still fine. The problem you are seeing is that the 3d coordinate system installed by tikz-3dplot tacitly works with cm units whereas the calc syntax yields pt. To see this more explicitly, let's look at the definition of tdplotsetmaincoords in tikz-3dplot.sty,



          newcommand{tdplotsetmaincoords}[2]{%
          %perform some trig for the display transformation
          %
          %
          %store the user-specified angles for possible future use
          pgfmathsetmacro{tdplotmaintheta}{#1}
          pgfmathsetmacro{tdplotmainphi}{#2}
          %
          %
          tdplotcalctransformmainscreen
          %
          %now here is where the output is performed
          tikzset{tdplot_main_coords/.style={x={(raarot cm,rbarot cm)},y={(rabrot cm, rbbrot cm)},z={(racrot cm, rbcrot cm)}}}%
          }


          Here, the coordinates get (unfortunately, one may perhaps add) multiplied by cm. (The macros racrot are just entries of the rotation matrix, i.e. an orthogonal 3x3 matrix parametrized in the conventions of the package.) I should, however, add that overall I love that package, so I am very far from criticizing the author. The more so since the problem can be fixed really easily.



          The arguably simplest fix is to convert back to cm by just dividing by 1cm/1pt.



          documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
          usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
          usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
          begin{document}

          tdplotsetmaincoords{0}{0} %doing nothing for now
          begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
          draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(1,0,0);
          draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(0,1,0); %just for reference

          coordinate (A) at (1,1);
          draw let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)--({x1*1pt/1cm},1,0); %this is problematic
          %draw[green] (1,1,0)--(28.45,1,0);
          draw[blue] let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)-- (x1,1);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          Welcome to TeX.SE! The let operator works still fine. The problem you are seeing is that the 3d coordinate system installed by tikz-3dplot tacitly works with cm units whereas the calc syntax yields pt. To see this more explicitly, let's look at the definition of tdplotsetmaincoords in tikz-3dplot.sty,



          newcommand{tdplotsetmaincoords}[2]{%
          %perform some trig for the display transformation
          %
          %
          %store the user-specified angles for possible future use
          pgfmathsetmacro{tdplotmaintheta}{#1}
          pgfmathsetmacro{tdplotmainphi}{#2}
          %
          %
          tdplotcalctransformmainscreen
          %
          %now here is where the output is performed
          tikzset{tdplot_main_coords/.style={x={(raarot cm,rbarot cm)},y={(rabrot cm, rbbrot cm)},z={(racrot cm, rbcrot cm)}}}%
          }


          Here, the coordinates get (unfortunately, one may perhaps add) multiplied by cm. (The macros racrot are just entries of the rotation matrix, i.e. an orthogonal 3x3 matrix parametrized in the conventions of the package.) I should, however, add that overall I love that package, so I am very far from criticizing the author. The more so since the problem can be fixed really easily.



          The arguably simplest fix is to convert back to cm by just dividing by 1cm/1pt.



          documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
          usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
          usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}
          begin{document}

          tdplotsetmaincoords{0}{0} %doing nothing for now
          begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
          draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(1,0,0);
          draw[red,->] (0,0,0)--(0,1,0); %just for reference

          coordinate (A) at (1,1);
          draw let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)--({x1*1pt/1cm},1,0); %this is problematic
          %draw[green] (1,1,0)--(28.45,1,0);
          draw[blue] let p1=(A) in (0,0,0)-- (x1,1);
          end{tikzpicture}
          end{document}


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Feb 10 at 2:45

























          answered Feb 10 at 2:34









          marmotmarmot

          116k5149280




          116k5149280













          • P.S. You might be interested in this commit.

            – marmot
            Feb 10 at 2:36











          • Perfect answer. Thank you very much. I knew I had seen this 28.sth before :) P.S. This coord thing seems indeed interesting, I will check it out.

            – D. Bogiokas
            Feb 10 at 2:45











          • @D.Bogiokas You're welcome! There are ideas to add the orthonormal transformations to the 3d library. However, if this happens, it won't happen tomorrow, and questions like this one will certainly greatly help to avoid some pitfalls.

            – marmot
            Feb 10 at 2:47



















          • P.S. You might be interested in this commit.

            – marmot
            Feb 10 at 2:36











          • Perfect answer. Thank you very much. I knew I had seen this 28.sth before :) P.S. This coord thing seems indeed interesting, I will check it out.

            – D. Bogiokas
            Feb 10 at 2:45











          • @D.Bogiokas You're welcome! There are ideas to add the orthonormal transformations to the 3d library. However, if this happens, it won't happen tomorrow, and questions like this one will certainly greatly help to avoid some pitfalls.

            – marmot
            Feb 10 at 2:47

















          P.S. You might be interested in this commit.

          – marmot
          Feb 10 at 2:36





          P.S. You might be interested in this commit.

          – marmot
          Feb 10 at 2:36













          Perfect answer. Thank you very much. I knew I had seen this 28.sth before :) P.S. This coord thing seems indeed interesting, I will check it out.

          – D. Bogiokas
          Feb 10 at 2:45





          Perfect answer. Thank you very much. I knew I had seen this 28.sth before :) P.S. This coord thing seems indeed interesting, I will check it out.

          – D. Bogiokas
          Feb 10 at 2:45













          @D.Bogiokas You're welcome! There are ideas to add the orthonormal transformations to the 3d library. However, if this happens, it won't happen tomorrow, and questions like this one will certainly greatly help to avoid some pitfalls.

          – marmot
          Feb 10 at 2:47





          @D.Bogiokas You're welcome! There are ideas to add the orthonormal transformations to the 3d library. However, if this happens, it won't happen tomorrow, and questions like this one will certainly greatly help to avoid some pitfalls.

          – marmot
          Feb 10 at 2:47


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474136%2ftikz-3dplot-causes-problems-to-let-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Human spaceflight

          Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

          張江高科駅