Vitali's Convergence Theorem but one hypothesis changes












1












$begingroup$


We have the following problem:



Let $(Y, Gamma , nu)$ be a measure space. Suppose that ${g_{n}} , subset , L^{p} , := , L^{p}(Y,Gamma , nu).$ Prove that $lim_{n} g_{n} = g$ in $L^p$ if and only if:



1) For each $epsilon > 0$
$$lim_{ntoinfty} nu({y in Y , : , |g_{n}(y)-g(y)| > epsilon }) = 0.$$
2) If $epsilon > 0$ exists $delta(epsilon) > 0$ such that if $E in Gamma$ and $nu(E) < delta(epsilon)$, then
$$left|int_{E} g , dnu right| < epsilon . $$

3) For each $epsilon > 0$ exists $N in mathbb{N}$ and a set $E_{epsilon} in Gamma$ with $nu(E_{epsilon}) < infty$ such that
$$ int_{E_{epsilon}^{c}} left| g_{n} right| ^{p} , dnu < epsilon quad forall n geq N. $$



As you can see the conditions are pretty similar to the Vitali's Convergence Theorem, except for the second one.



I have been following the proof in the book of Rober G. Bartle called Element of Integration but I can't change that proof so that fits in my problem.



So far the idea that I had is consider $epsilon>0$ and let $E_{epsilon}$ be as in 3). Then apply the Minkowski inequality to the function $g_n-g=(g_n-g)chi_{E_{epsilon}}+g_nchi_{E_{epsilon}^c}+(-g)chi_{E_{epsilon}^c}$.



From there I can narrow the second and the first elements, but not the last one.
I would really appreciate some help.



Thank you so much.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is a positive metric space?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Jan 14 at 11:41










  • $begingroup$
    That was a bad translation, sorry for that. I will change it.
    $endgroup$
    – Alejandro Mahillo
    Jan 14 at 12:06










  • $begingroup$
    I think there is an error in 3). Instead of $nu_{epsilon} (E) <infty$ you should have $nu_{epsilon} (E) <epsilon$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 14 at 12:11












  • $begingroup$
    I meant $nu (E_{epsilon})$ when I wrote $nu_{epsilon}(E)$ in my comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 14 at 12:19












  • $begingroup$
    I have read again what my problem says and I think I typed that part correctly. I have been seeing this theorem usually with the conditions number 2) and 3) exchanged, so my number 3) is usually number 2) and my number 2) is number 3). One example of that is the page of Wikipedia about Vitali Convergence Theorem en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitali_convergence_theorem
    $endgroup$
    – Alejandro Mahillo
    Jan 14 at 12:28


















1












$begingroup$


We have the following problem:



Let $(Y, Gamma , nu)$ be a measure space. Suppose that ${g_{n}} , subset , L^{p} , := , L^{p}(Y,Gamma , nu).$ Prove that $lim_{n} g_{n} = g$ in $L^p$ if and only if:



1) For each $epsilon > 0$
$$lim_{ntoinfty} nu({y in Y , : , |g_{n}(y)-g(y)| > epsilon }) = 0.$$
2) If $epsilon > 0$ exists $delta(epsilon) > 0$ such that if $E in Gamma$ and $nu(E) < delta(epsilon)$, then
$$left|int_{E} g , dnu right| < epsilon . $$

3) For each $epsilon > 0$ exists $N in mathbb{N}$ and a set $E_{epsilon} in Gamma$ with $nu(E_{epsilon}) < infty$ such that
$$ int_{E_{epsilon}^{c}} left| g_{n} right| ^{p} , dnu < epsilon quad forall n geq N. $$



As you can see the conditions are pretty similar to the Vitali's Convergence Theorem, except for the second one.



I have been following the proof in the book of Rober G. Bartle called Element of Integration but I can't change that proof so that fits in my problem.



So far the idea that I had is consider $epsilon>0$ and let $E_{epsilon}$ be as in 3). Then apply the Minkowski inequality to the function $g_n-g=(g_n-g)chi_{E_{epsilon}}+g_nchi_{E_{epsilon}^c}+(-g)chi_{E_{epsilon}^c}$.



From there I can narrow the second and the first elements, but not the last one.
I would really appreciate some help.



Thank you so much.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is a positive metric space?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Jan 14 at 11:41










  • $begingroup$
    That was a bad translation, sorry for that. I will change it.
    $endgroup$
    – Alejandro Mahillo
    Jan 14 at 12:06










  • $begingroup$
    I think there is an error in 3). Instead of $nu_{epsilon} (E) <infty$ you should have $nu_{epsilon} (E) <epsilon$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 14 at 12:11












  • $begingroup$
    I meant $nu (E_{epsilon})$ when I wrote $nu_{epsilon}(E)$ in my comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 14 at 12:19












  • $begingroup$
    I have read again what my problem says and I think I typed that part correctly. I have been seeing this theorem usually with the conditions number 2) and 3) exchanged, so my number 3) is usually number 2) and my number 2) is number 3). One example of that is the page of Wikipedia about Vitali Convergence Theorem en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitali_convergence_theorem
    $endgroup$
    – Alejandro Mahillo
    Jan 14 at 12:28
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


We have the following problem:



Let $(Y, Gamma , nu)$ be a measure space. Suppose that ${g_{n}} , subset , L^{p} , := , L^{p}(Y,Gamma , nu).$ Prove that $lim_{n} g_{n} = g$ in $L^p$ if and only if:



1) For each $epsilon > 0$
$$lim_{ntoinfty} nu({y in Y , : , |g_{n}(y)-g(y)| > epsilon }) = 0.$$
2) If $epsilon > 0$ exists $delta(epsilon) > 0$ such that if $E in Gamma$ and $nu(E) < delta(epsilon)$, then
$$left|int_{E} g , dnu right| < epsilon . $$

3) For each $epsilon > 0$ exists $N in mathbb{N}$ and a set $E_{epsilon} in Gamma$ with $nu(E_{epsilon}) < infty$ such that
$$ int_{E_{epsilon}^{c}} left| g_{n} right| ^{p} , dnu < epsilon quad forall n geq N. $$



As you can see the conditions are pretty similar to the Vitali's Convergence Theorem, except for the second one.



I have been following the proof in the book of Rober G. Bartle called Element of Integration but I can't change that proof so that fits in my problem.



So far the idea that I had is consider $epsilon>0$ and let $E_{epsilon}$ be as in 3). Then apply the Minkowski inequality to the function $g_n-g=(g_n-g)chi_{E_{epsilon}}+g_nchi_{E_{epsilon}^c}+(-g)chi_{E_{epsilon}^c}$.



From there I can narrow the second and the first elements, but not the last one.
I would really appreciate some help.



Thank you so much.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




We have the following problem:



Let $(Y, Gamma , nu)$ be a measure space. Suppose that ${g_{n}} , subset , L^{p} , := , L^{p}(Y,Gamma , nu).$ Prove that $lim_{n} g_{n} = g$ in $L^p$ if and only if:



1) For each $epsilon > 0$
$$lim_{ntoinfty} nu({y in Y , : , |g_{n}(y)-g(y)| > epsilon }) = 0.$$
2) If $epsilon > 0$ exists $delta(epsilon) > 0$ such that if $E in Gamma$ and $nu(E) < delta(epsilon)$, then
$$left|int_{E} g , dnu right| < epsilon . $$

3) For each $epsilon > 0$ exists $N in mathbb{N}$ and a set $E_{epsilon} in Gamma$ with $nu(E_{epsilon}) < infty$ such that
$$ int_{E_{epsilon}^{c}} left| g_{n} right| ^{p} , dnu < epsilon quad forall n geq N. $$



As you can see the conditions are pretty similar to the Vitali's Convergence Theorem, except for the second one.



I have been following the proof in the book of Rober G. Bartle called Element of Integration but I can't change that proof so that fits in my problem.



So far the idea that I had is consider $epsilon>0$ and let $E_{epsilon}$ be as in 3). Then apply the Minkowski inequality to the function $g_n-g=(g_n-g)chi_{E_{epsilon}}+g_nchi_{E_{epsilon}^c}+(-g)chi_{E_{epsilon}^c}$.



From there I can narrow the second and the first elements, but not the last one.
I would really appreciate some help.



Thank you so much.







real-analysis functional-analysis measure-theory convergence lp-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 14 at 14:35









David C. Ullrich

61.6k43994




61.6k43994










asked Jan 14 at 11:26









Alejandro MahilloAlejandro Mahillo

85




85












  • $begingroup$
    What is a positive metric space?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Jan 14 at 11:41










  • $begingroup$
    That was a bad translation, sorry for that. I will change it.
    $endgroup$
    – Alejandro Mahillo
    Jan 14 at 12:06










  • $begingroup$
    I think there is an error in 3). Instead of $nu_{epsilon} (E) <infty$ you should have $nu_{epsilon} (E) <epsilon$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 14 at 12:11












  • $begingroup$
    I meant $nu (E_{epsilon})$ when I wrote $nu_{epsilon}(E)$ in my comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 14 at 12:19












  • $begingroup$
    I have read again what my problem says and I think I typed that part correctly. I have been seeing this theorem usually with the conditions number 2) and 3) exchanged, so my number 3) is usually number 2) and my number 2) is number 3). One example of that is the page of Wikipedia about Vitali Convergence Theorem en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitali_convergence_theorem
    $endgroup$
    – Alejandro Mahillo
    Jan 14 at 12:28




















  • $begingroup$
    What is a positive metric space?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Jan 14 at 11:41










  • $begingroup$
    That was a bad translation, sorry for that. I will change it.
    $endgroup$
    – Alejandro Mahillo
    Jan 14 at 12:06










  • $begingroup$
    I think there is an error in 3). Instead of $nu_{epsilon} (E) <infty$ you should have $nu_{epsilon} (E) <epsilon$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 14 at 12:11












  • $begingroup$
    I meant $nu (E_{epsilon})$ when I wrote $nu_{epsilon}(E)$ in my comment.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 14 at 12:19












  • $begingroup$
    I have read again what my problem says and I think I typed that part correctly. I have been seeing this theorem usually with the conditions number 2) and 3) exchanged, so my number 3) is usually number 2) and my number 2) is number 3). One example of that is the page of Wikipedia about Vitali Convergence Theorem en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitali_convergence_theorem
    $endgroup$
    – Alejandro Mahillo
    Jan 14 at 12:28


















$begingroup$
What is a positive metric space?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 14 at 11:41




$begingroup$
What is a positive metric space?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 14 at 11:41












$begingroup$
That was a bad translation, sorry for that. I will change it.
$endgroup$
– Alejandro Mahillo
Jan 14 at 12:06




$begingroup$
That was a bad translation, sorry for that. I will change it.
$endgroup$
– Alejandro Mahillo
Jan 14 at 12:06












$begingroup$
I think there is an error in 3). Instead of $nu_{epsilon} (E) <infty$ you should have $nu_{epsilon} (E) <epsilon$.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 14 at 12:11






$begingroup$
I think there is an error in 3). Instead of $nu_{epsilon} (E) <infty$ you should have $nu_{epsilon} (E) <epsilon$.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 14 at 12:11














$begingroup$
I meant $nu (E_{epsilon})$ when I wrote $nu_{epsilon}(E)$ in my comment.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 14 at 12:19






$begingroup$
I meant $nu (E_{epsilon})$ when I wrote $nu_{epsilon}(E)$ in my comment.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 14 at 12:19














$begingroup$
I have read again what my problem says and I think I typed that part correctly. I have been seeing this theorem usually with the conditions number 2) and 3) exchanged, so my number 3) is usually number 2) and my number 2) is number 3). One example of that is the page of Wikipedia about Vitali Convergence Theorem en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitali_convergence_theorem
$endgroup$
– Alejandro Mahillo
Jan 14 at 12:28






$begingroup$
I have read again what my problem says and I think I typed that part correctly. I have been seeing this theorem usually with the conditions number 2) and 3) exchanged, so my number 3) is usually number 2) and my number 2) is number 3). One example of that is the page of Wikipedia about Vitali Convergence Theorem en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitali_convergence_theorem
$endgroup$
– Alejandro Mahillo
Jan 14 at 12:28












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The statement is wrong: Take $g_n = n 1_{(0,1/n]}$. Then $g_n(x) rightarrow 0$ for all $x in mathbb{R}$. The measure space under consideration should be $(mathbb{R},mathcal{B}(mathbb{R}),lambda)$, i.e. the Lebesgue measure on $mathbb{R}$. Then we have $lambda(|g_n|> 0) = 1/n rightarrow 0$. Since $g=0$, the condition (2) is always satisfied. In (3) you can take $E_varepsilon = [0,varepsilon]$. Then $nu(E_varepsilon) < varepsilon$ and for all $n ge N$ with $1/N < varepsilon$ we have
$$int_{E_varepsilon^c} |g_n| d lambda =0,$$
i.e. the modifacted version of Kavi Rama Murthy holds.



The problem is that (2) should be replaced by the condition that for all measurable sets $A$ with $nu(A)< delta$
$$int_{E} |g_n| , d nu < varepsilon quad text{for all } n in mathbb{N}.$$
By taking $E cap {g_n ge 0 }$, resp. $E cap {g_n le 0 }$ the last conidition can be replaced by
$$left| int_{E} g_n , d nu right| < varepsilon quad text{for all } n in mathbb{N}.$$
This is exactly the condition which can be found in the corresponding Wikipedia article, as cited in the comments. Note that we don't need to make the modification as made in Kavi Rama Murthy answer.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    As I mentioned in one of the comments 3) should say $nu (E_{epsilon}) <epsilon$. Here is how you handle the last term in your decomposition: by going to a subsequence we may replace 1) by almost everywhere convergence. Let $epsilon >0$ Then we have $int_{E_{epsilon}^{c}} |g_n|^{p}dnu <epsilon$ for $n$ sufficiently large. By Fatou's Lemma this gives $int_{E_{epsilon}^{c}} |g|^{p}dnu leqdelta$. Hence $|-gI_{E_{epsilon}^{c}}|_p leq epsilon^{1/p}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073127%2fvitalis-convergence-theorem-but-one-hypothesis-changes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      The statement is wrong: Take $g_n = n 1_{(0,1/n]}$. Then $g_n(x) rightarrow 0$ for all $x in mathbb{R}$. The measure space under consideration should be $(mathbb{R},mathcal{B}(mathbb{R}),lambda)$, i.e. the Lebesgue measure on $mathbb{R}$. Then we have $lambda(|g_n|> 0) = 1/n rightarrow 0$. Since $g=0$, the condition (2) is always satisfied. In (3) you can take $E_varepsilon = [0,varepsilon]$. Then $nu(E_varepsilon) < varepsilon$ and for all $n ge N$ with $1/N < varepsilon$ we have
      $$int_{E_varepsilon^c} |g_n| d lambda =0,$$
      i.e. the modifacted version of Kavi Rama Murthy holds.



      The problem is that (2) should be replaced by the condition that for all measurable sets $A$ with $nu(A)< delta$
      $$int_{E} |g_n| , d nu < varepsilon quad text{for all } n in mathbb{N}.$$
      By taking $E cap {g_n ge 0 }$, resp. $E cap {g_n le 0 }$ the last conidition can be replaced by
      $$left| int_{E} g_n , d nu right| < varepsilon quad text{for all } n in mathbb{N}.$$
      This is exactly the condition which can be found in the corresponding Wikipedia article, as cited in the comments. Note that we don't need to make the modification as made in Kavi Rama Murthy answer.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        2












        $begingroup$

        The statement is wrong: Take $g_n = n 1_{(0,1/n]}$. Then $g_n(x) rightarrow 0$ for all $x in mathbb{R}$. The measure space under consideration should be $(mathbb{R},mathcal{B}(mathbb{R}),lambda)$, i.e. the Lebesgue measure on $mathbb{R}$. Then we have $lambda(|g_n|> 0) = 1/n rightarrow 0$. Since $g=0$, the condition (2) is always satisfied. In (3) you can take $E_varepsilon = [0,varepsilon]$. Then $nu(E_varepsilon) < varepsilon$ and for all $n ge N$ with $1/N < varepsilon$ we have
        $$int_{E_varepsilon^c} |g_n| d lambda =0,$$
        i.e. the modifacted version of Kavi Rama Murthy holds.



        The problem is that (2) should be replaced by the condition that for all measurable sets $A$ with $nu(A)< delta$
        $$int_{E} |g_n| , d nu < varepsilon quad text{for all } n in mathbb{N}.$$
        By taking $E cap {g_n ge 0 }$, resp. $E cap {g_n le 0 }$ the last conidition can be replaced by
        $$left| int_{E} g_n , d nu right| < varepsilon quad text{for all } n in mathbb{N}.$$
        This is exactly the condition which can be found in the corresponding Wikipedia article, as cited in the comments. Note that we don't need to make the modification as made in Kavi Rama Murthy answer.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          The statement is wrong: Take $g_n = n 1_{(0,1/n]}$. Then $g_n(x) rightarrow 0$ for all $x in mathbb{R}$. The measure space under consideration should be $(mathbb{R},mathcal{B}(mathbb{R}),lambda)$, i.e. the Lebesgue measure on $mathbb{R}$. Then we have $lambda(|g_n|> 0) = 1/n rightarrow 0$. Since $g=0$, the condition (2) is always satisfied. In (3) you can take $E_varepsilon = [0,varepsilon]$. Then $nu(E_varepsilon) < varepsilon$ and for all $n ge N$ with $1/N < varepsilon$ we have
          $$int_{E_varepsilon^c} |g_n| d lambda =0,$$
          i.e. the modifacted version of Kavi Rama Murthy holds.



          The problem is that (2) should be replaced by the condition that for all measurable sets $A$ with $nu(A)< delta$
          $$int_{E} |g_n| , d nu < varepsilon quad text{for all } n in mathbb{N}.$$
          By taking $E cap {g_n ge 0 }$, resp. $E cap {g_n le 0 }$ the last conidition can be replaced by
          $$left| int_{E} g_n , d nu right| < varepsilon quad text{for all } n in mathbb{N}.$$
          This is exactly the condition which can be found in the corresponding Wikipedia article, as cited in the comments. Note that we don't need to make the modification as made in Kavi Rama Murthy answer.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The statement is wrong: Take $g_n = n 1_{(0,1/n]}$. Then $g_n(x) rightarrow 0$ for all $x in mathbb{R}$. The measure space under consideration should be $(mathbb{R},mathcal{B}(mathbb{R}),lambda)$, i.e. the Lebesgue measure on $mathbb{R}$. Then we have $lambda(|g_n|> 0) = 1/n rightarrow 0$. Since $g=0$, the condition (2) is always satisfied. In (3) you can take $E_varepsilon = [0,varepsilon]$. Then $nu(E_varepsilon) < varepsilon$ and for all $n ge N$ with $1/N < varepsilon$ we have
          $$int_{E_varepsilon^c} |g_n| d lambda =0,$$
          i.e. the modifacted version of Kavi Rama Murthy holds.



          The problem is that (2) should be replaced by the condition that for all measurable sets $A$ with $nu(A)< delta$
          $$int_{E} |g_n| , d nu < varepsilon quad text{for all } n in mathbb{N}.$$
          By taking $E cap {g_n ge 0 }$, resp. $E cap {g_n le 0 }$ the last conidition can be replaced by
          $$left| int_{E} g_n , d nu right| < varepsilon quad text{for all } n in mathbb{N}.$$
          This is exactly the condition which can be found in the corresponding Wikipedia article, as cited in the comments. Note that we don't need to make the modification as made in Kavi Rama Murthy answer.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 14 at 13:56

























          answered Jan 14 at 13:08









          p4schp4sch

          5,460318




          5,460318























              0












              $begingroup$

              As I mentioned in one of the comments 3) should say $nu (E_{epsilon}) <epsilon$. Here is how you handle the last term in your decomposition: by going to a subsequence we may replace 1) by almost everywhere convergence. Let $epsilon >0$ Then we have $int_{E_{epsilon}^{c}} |g_n|^{p}dnu <epsilon$ for $n$ sufficiently large. By Fatou's Lemma this gives $int_{E_{epsilon}^{c}} |g|^{p}dnu leqdelta$. Hence $|-gI_{E_{epsilon}^{c}}|_p leq epsilon^{1/p}$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                As I mentioned in one of the comments 3) should say $nu (E_{epsilon}) <epsilon$. Here is how you handle the last term in your decomposition: by going to a subsequence we may replace 1) by almost everywhere convergence. Let $epsilon >0$ Then we have $int_{E_{epsilon}^{c}} |g_n|^{p}dnu <epsilon$ for $n$ sufficiently large. By Fatou's Lemma this gives $int_{E_{epsilon}^{c}} |g|^{p}dnu leqdelta$. Hence $|-gI_{E_{epsilon}^{c}}|_p leq epsilon^{1/p}$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  As I mentioned in one of the comments 3) should say $nu (E_{epsilon}) <epsilon$. Here is how you handle the last term in your decomposition: by going to a subsequence we may replace 1) by almost everywhere convergence. Let $epsilon >0$ Then we have $int_{E_{epsilon}^{c}} |g_n|^{p}dnu <epsilon$ for $n$ sufficiently large. By Fatou's Lemma this gives $int_{E_{epsilon}^{c}} |g|^{p}dnu leqdelta$. Hence $|-gI_{E_{epsilon}^{c}}|_p leq epsilon^{1/p}$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  As I mentioned in one of the comments 3) should say $nu (E_{epsilon}) <epsilon$. Here is how you handle the last term in your decomposition: by going to a subsequence we may replace 1) by almost everywhere convergence. Let $epsilon >0$ Then we have $int_{E_{epsilon}^{c}} |g_n|^{p}dnu <epsilon$ for $n$ sufficiently large. By Fatou's Lemma this gives $int_{E_{epsilon}^{c}} |g|^{p}dnu leqdelta$. Hence $|-gI_{E_{epsilon}^{c}}|_p leq epsilon^{1/p}$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 14 at 12:27









                  Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

                  69.2k53169




                  69.2k53169






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073127%2fvitalis-convergence-theorem-but-one-hypothesis-changes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Questions related to Moebius Transform of Characteristic Function of the Primes

                      List of scandals in India

                      Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?