Would the top 100 men in most physical sports beat each of the top 100 women?












71














In The Ancestor's Tale, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins makes the following statement about sexual dimorphism:




Our sexual dimporhism is moderate but undeniable. Lots of women are taller than lots of men, but the tallest men are taller than the tallest women. Lots of women can run faster, lift heavier weights, throw javelins further, play better tennis, than lots of men. But for humans, unlike for racehorses, the underlying sexual dimorphism precludes sex-blind open competition at the top level in almost any sport you care to name. In most physical sports, every single one of the world’s top hundred men would beat every single one of the world’s top hundred women.




I wonder if this has been backed up with proper data.










share|improve this question









New contributor




I. Haage is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 5




    The claim doesn't even make sense for team sports.
    – alephzero
    yesterday






  • 14




    @DanielT. The claim clearly qualifies "physical sports" only. Further, covers its hyperbolic nature by saying "most" as well.
    – fredsbend
    yesterday






  • 8




    Dear visitors to Skeptics.SE. Please don't paste half-baked answers in comments. Please don't express your opinions about the world in comments. Comments are for improving and clarifying the questions and answers.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 2




    A problem several answers are having is that this claim is wishy-washy. "Most physical sports" gives the impression sports have a clear, countable number of candidates. (Hint: The Olympics is not a list of all sports.) Also, @alephzero's point about team sports.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 3




    @alephzero The claim covers "every single" male or female and is not intended to make sense for team sports. When you say "team sports", do you mean "mixed team sports"?
    – Boodysaspie
    yesterday
















71














In The Ancestor's Tale, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins makes the following statement about sexual dimorphism:




Our sexual dimporhism is moderate but undeniable. Lots of women are taller than lots of men, but the tallest men are taller than the tallest women. Lots of women can run faster, lift heavier weights, throw javelins further, play better tennis, than lots of men. But for humans, unlike for racehorses, the underlying sexual dimorphism precludes sex-blind open competition at the top level in almost any sport you care to name. In most physical sports, every single one of the world’s top hundred men would beat every single one of the world’s top hundred women.




I wonder if this has been backed up with proper data.










share|improve this question









New contributor




I. Haage is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 5




    The claim doesn't even make sense for team sports.
    – alephzero
    yesterday






  • 14




    @DanielT. The claim clearly qualifies "physical sports" only. Further, covers its hyperbolic nature by saying "most" as well.
    – fredsbend
    yesterday






  • 8




    Dear visitors to Skeptics.SE. Please don't paste half-baked answers in comments. Please don't express your opinions about the world in comments. Comments are for improving and clarifying the questions and answers.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 2




    A problem several answers are having is that this claim is wishy-washy. "Most physical sports" gives the impression sports have a clear, countable number of candidates. (Hint: The Olympics is not a list of all sports.) Also, @alephzero's point about team sports.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 3




    @alephzero The claim covers "every single" male or female and is not intended to make sense for team sports. When you say "team sports", do you mean "mixed team sports"?
    – Boodysaspie
    yesterday














71












71








71


8





In The Ancestor's Tale, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins makes the following statement about sexual dimorphism:




Our sexual dimporhism is moderate but undeniable. Lots of women are taller than lots of men, but the tallest men are taller than the tallest women. Lots of women can run faster, lift heavier weights, throw javelins further, play better tennis, than lots of men. But for humans, unlike for racehorses, the underlying sexual dimorphism precludes sex-blind open competition at the top level in almost any sport you care to name. In most physical sports, every single one of the world’s top hundred men would beat every single one of the world’s top hundred women.




I wonder if this has been backed up with proper data.










share|improve this question









New contributor




I. Haage is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











In The Ancestor's Tale, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins makes the following statement about sexual dimorphism:




Our sexual dimporhism is moderate but undeniable. Lots of women are taller than lots of men, but the tallest men are taller than the tallest women. Lots of women can run faster, lift heavier weights, throw javelins further, play better tennis, than lots of men. But for humans, unlike for racehorses, the underlying sexual dimorphism precludes sex-blind open competition at the top level in almost any sport you care to name. In most physical sports, every single one of the world’s top hundred men would beat every single one of the world’s top hundred women.




I wonder if this has been backed up with proper data.







sport






share|improve this question









New contributor




I. Haage is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




I. Haage is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 18 hours ago









Pedro A

1115




1115






New contributor




I. Haage is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









I. Haage

43828




43828




New contributor




I. Haage is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





I. Haage is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






I. Haage is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 5




    The claim doesn't even make sense for team sports.
    – alephzero
    yesterday






  • 14




    @DanielT. The claim clearly qualifies "physical sports" only. Further, covers its hyperbolic nature by saying "most" as well.
    – fredsbend
    yesterday






  • 8




    Dear visitors to Skeptics.SE. Please don't paste half-baked answers in comments. Please don't express your opinions about the world in comments. Comments are for improving and clarifying the questions and answers.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 2




    A problem several answers are having is that this claim is wishy-washy. "Most physical sports" gives the impression sports have a clear, countable number of candidates. (Hint: The Olympics is not a list of all sports.) Also, @alephzero's point about team sports.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 3




    @alephzero The claim covers "every single" male or female and is not intended to make sense for team sports. When you say "team sports", do you mean "mixed team sports"?
    – Boodysaspie
    yesterday














  • 5




    The claim doesn't even make sense for team sports.
    – alephzero
    yesterday






  • 14




    @DanielT. The claim clearly qualifies "physical sports" only. Further, covers its hyperbolic nature by saying "most" as well.
    – fredsbend
    yesterday






  • 8




    Dear visitors to Skeptics.SE. Please don't paste half-baked answers in comments. Please don't express your opinions about the world in comments. Comments are for improving and clarifying the questions and answers.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 2




    A problem several answers are having is that this claim is wishy-washy. "Most physical sports" gives the impression sports have a clear, countable number of candidates. (Hint: The Olympics is not a list of all sports.) Also, @alephzero's point about team sports.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 3




    @alephzero The claim covers "every single" male or female and is not intended to make sense for team sports. When you say "team sports", do you mean "mixed team sports"?
    – Boodysaspie
    yesterday








5




5




The claim doesn't even make sense for team sports.
– alephzero
yesterday




The claim doesn't even make sense for team sports.
– alephzero
yesterday




14




14




@DanielT. The claim clearly qualifies "physical sports" only. Further, covers its hyperbolic nature by saying "most" as well.
– fredsbend
yesterday




@DanielT. The claim clearly qualifies "physical sports" only. Further, covers its hyperbolic nature by saying "most" as well.
– fredsbend
yesterday




8




8




Dear visitors to Skeptics.SE. Please don't paste half-baked answers in comments. Please don't express your opinions about the world in comments. Comments are for improving and clarifying the questions and answers.
– Oddthinking
yesterday




Dear visitors to Skeptics.SE. Please don't paste half-baked answers in comments. Please don't express your opinions about the world in comments. Comments are for improving and clarifying the questions and answers.
– Oddthinking
yesterday




2




2




A problem several answers are having is that this claim is wishy-washy. "Most physical sports" gives the impression sports have a clear, countable number of candidates. (Hint: The Olympics is not a list of all sports.) Also, @alephzero's point about team sports.
– Oddthinking
yesterday




A problem several answers are having is that this claim is wishy-washy. "Most physical sports" gives the impression sports have a clear, countable number of candidates. (Hint: The Olympics is not a list of all sports.) Also, @alephzero's point about team sports.
– Oddthinking
yesterday




3




3




@alephzero The claim covers "every single" male or female and is not intended to make sense for team sports. When you say "team sports", do you mean "mixed team sports"?
– Boodysaspie
yesterday




@alephzero The claim covers "every single" male or female and is not intended to make sense for team sports. When you say "team sports", do you mean "mixed team sports"?
– Boodysaspie
yesterday










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















95














Expanding on Xen2050's information, the wikipedia List of Olympic records in Athletics page has links to each individual sport, listing the top 25 results by gender. I've compiled the information showing the 25th-best men's result vs. the best women's result. (I skipped the 110m hurdles since they are not directly comparable.) This does not prove the claim (top 100 men vs. top 100 women) but it does give a better feel for the discrepancy between genders in the results:



Sport:              25th-ranked men's result:   top-ranked women's result:
100m 9.87 10.49
200m 19.80 21.34
400m 44.10 47.60
800m 1:42.81 1:53.28
1500m 3:29.59 3:50.07
5000m 12:51.00 14:11.15
10000m 26:49.94 29:17.45
Marathon 2:04:32 2:15:25
400m Hurdle 47.67 52.34
3000m Steeplechase 8:04.95 8:44.32
4x100 Relay 37.58 (*) 40.82
4x400 Relay 2:57.87 3:15.17
20k Walk 1:18:06 1:23:39
50k Walk 3:36:20 (**) 4:05:56
High Jump 2.38m 2.09m
Long Jump 8.51m 7.52m
Pole Vault 5.98m 5.06m
Triple Jump 17.75m 15.50m
-- these events use different equipment:
Shot Put (+) 22.08m 22.63m (would get 10th place on men's listing)
Discus Throw (+) 69.95m 76.80m (would get 1st place on men's listing)
Hammer Throw (+) 82.54m 82.98m (would get 19th place on men's listing)
Javelin Throw (+) 89.02m 72.28m
Decathlon (+) 8663 points 8358 points


notes:

(*): 20th-place result; lower results not available

(**): 10th-place result; lower results not available

(+): the equipment used is different between men and women. For example, the men's discus weighs 2kg and is 22cm in diameter, while the women's discus weighs 1kg and is 18cm in diameter. The shots, hammers and javelins are also lighter for the women's events. Therefore, these events are not really directly comparable.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Hellion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 9




    It would be great to expand this to include non track&field sports where they are quantifiable and comparable... swimming, weight lifting, canoe/kayak, cycling. (Annoyingly, it looks like men's and women's events use different courses for skiing, so it's not a good comparison.) One other thing to note, in the Olympic equestrian events where men and women compete directly, women do make it onto the teams and onto the podium.
    – user3067860
    yesterday






  • 10




    Ultra-marathons: 1st woman ranks 6th in men's list for 100 mile. ultrarunning.com/featured/ultrarunning-magazine-all-time-lists. For 3100 miles: 1st woman ranks 2nd in men's list. For 1000 mile, 1st woman ranks 7th in men's list.
    – Chloe
    yesterday








  • 29




    @SebastiaanvandenBroek because the lists on Wikipedia only went to 25th place.
    – Hellion
    yesterday






  • 7




    @Chloe - it is of note that this is almost certainly due to very low competitiveness of ultramarathons (7% difference between #1 and #10).
    – Davor
    yesterday






  • 4




    I would argue Decathlon is not really directly comparable as well, as the men and women use different scoring tables, contains the various throwing events with different equipment weights as mentioned in answer, has 110m hurdles for men and 100m hurdles for women, and (less importantly) the decathlon has primarily been replaced by the heptathlon for the top tier of women, as the women's heptathlon is the combined athletics event at the Olympics and other top meets instead of the decathlon.
    – Jimmy M.
    22 hours ago



















74














On the evidence of the IAAF, the 100th best male athlete is significantly faster and/or stronger than a female. Here are a few examples:



Event     100th Man  1st Woman   Eq male rank
100m 10.15 10.85 3,460th
1500m 3:38.28 3:56.68 > 3,143th (a)
Marathon 2:08:46 2:18:11 797th
High Jump 2.23 2.04 1,085th
Long Jump 7.91 7.05 1,898th
Javelin 77.27 68.92 437th (b)


Note (a): There are only 3,143 entries for the men's 1500m, the slowest being 3:56.00 seconds.
(b) The men's javelin is longer and 33% heavier.



The World Swimming Rankings tell a similar story, but also give one example of an exception. Katie Ledecky's time for the 1500m Freestyle ranks her 72nd among the men. She is clearly an outstanding swimmer, as she is 31 seconds, or one full length, faster than her nearest female rival. She also competes in the 400m and 800m, where she is outside the top 100 men and her times are closer to other women's.



Given that men are more athletic at athletics, they should have the same advantage in team games such as football or rugby, but direct competitions, and therefore comparisons, aren't available.



However, this article has some revealing opinions from champions of both sexes into men's vs. women's tennis.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Boodysaspie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 24




    @Richard Yes, a female athlete from a country with a strong culture of sprinting can beat a man from Tuvalu or Kiribati, if he's qualifying and she's sprinting at a final pace. Her qualifying times would not have been successful in any male heat, her semifinal time was too slow to qualify for the men's final and her final time would have left her embarrassingly last against the men.
    – Boodysaspie
    yesterday






  • 17




    @Richard You're making the assumption that the people present were the top 100 people, which is almost certainly false. A tiny island nation is very unlikely to have one of the top 100, while very large nations (especially highly-developed ones) may have many of the top 100 people, even though only a few of them could participate in the Olympics.
    – reirab
    yesterday






  • 11




    @Richard There were 22 sprinters in the Men's preliminary heat and the fastest time was 10.43. That likely wouldn't have qualified the sprinter in the top 100 for last years US College Track & Field season (#1 was 9.93, #25 was 10.14). The preliminaries weren't for top 100 sprinters, they were for tiny countries who didn't have world class sprinters. The women's preliminaries only had two sprinters break 12 seconds. Seven couldn't break 13 seconds, three of which couldn't break 14 seconds.
    – SafeFastExpressive
    yesterday






  • 4




    @Richard Don't forget the Olympics places restrictions on number of athletes per country. If Country A has the top 100 sprinters in the world, they can still only send 3 sprinters. Whoever placed 4th at the Olympics therefore would probably still only be the 101st fastest sprinter worldwide in such an example.
    – Jimmy M.
    22 hours ago






  • 6




    @Richard, this data appears to actually support the claim made by Dawkins. All 62 of the men who met the qualifying standard for the event ran faster than the winner from the women's field. As others have pointed out, the 22 prelim runners are likely not actually in the top 100 while some of the "true" top 100 did qualify for the Olympics because they were behind faster runners from their home country. All 33 men beat the women's world record at the US qualifying event, but only 3 went to the Olympics tfrrs.org/results/46783/2887543/2016_U.S._Olympic_Trials/…
    – Mark Peterson
    22 hours ago



















12














Extremes



In the fuller quote, Dawkins seems to be talking about extremes, "Lots of women are taller than lots of men, but the tallest men are taller than the tallest women." He also uses the example of racehorses, which don't compete in a team sport, but rather against each other to see which can run the fastest. Finally with "most physical sports" and "the top level in almost any sport," that's almost the literal definition of the Olympics, which Britannica.com says "[t]he Olympic Games have come to be regarded as the world’s foremost sports competition."



Therefore it makes sense to look at the extreme performance records of the Olympic games, specifically events where running times & jumping distances are easiest to compare. Not just the current athletes, but the all time records to really find the best extreme performers.



Comparing the very top record performers would show the very extremes of performance, as Dawkings was at least partially partially talking about. Here's the Olympic events & their all time records from Wikipedia's List of Olympic records in athletics, I'll try formatting them by sport, with the mens & women's records side-by-side for easier comparison:



                              Records
Event Men's Women's
===== ===== =======
100m 9.63 10.62
200 metres 19.30 ♦21.34
400 metres ♦43.03 48.25
800 metres ♦1:40.91 1:53.43
1,500 metres 3:32.07 3:53.96
5,000 metres 12:57.82 14:26.17
10,000 metres 27:01.17 ♦29:17.45
Marathon 2:06:32 2:23:07
110 metres hurdles 12.91 12.35
* only 100m hurdles for women
400 metres hurdles ♦46.78 52.64
3,000 m steeplechase 8:03.28 8:58.81
4×100 m relay ♦36.84 ♦40.82
4×400 m relay 2:55.39 ♦3:15.17
20 km walk 1:18:46 1:25:02
High jump 2.39 m 2.06 m
Long jump 8.90 m 7.40 m
Pole vault 6.03 m 5.05 m
Triple jump 18.09 m 15.39 m
(♦ denotes a performance that is also a current world record.
Statistics are correct as of 19 August 2016.)


The following events differ in the weight of the item thrown so aren't directly comparable, but given the drastic difference in weight of the items (usually half as heavy for women) yet still similar records, it seems worthy of inclusion:



Shot put                22.52 m     22.41 m
* men's shot weighs 16 lb, women's 8.8 lb
Discus throw 69.89 m 72.30 m
* men's weigh 2kg/4.4 lb, women's 1kg/2.2 lb
Hammer throw 84.80 m 82.29 m
* men's weigh 16 lb, women's 8.82 lb
Javelin throw 90.57 m 71.53 m
* men's weigh 800g/1.76 lb, women's 600g/1.32 lb


It appears that the men's records are quicker/faster/further for everything except the incomparable item throwing events. This strongly supports Dawkins' statement.



What about the next 99 athletes?



I would ask Dawkins why he chose the seemingly arbitrary number of the top 100 men & women, it could've been with the idea that there are only a few extreme performers, but the Olympic records seem to indicate that there's not only a dozen or even a hundred, but thousands of very closely performing athletes.



Looking specifically at the (arbitrary) 100th best vs the very best, using the IAAF source for Wikipedia, similar to Boodysaspie's good answer but not just looking at current athletes but all time records (or at least since electronic timing ) and not just the Olympics, gives results with usually far more than 100 men's records faster than the fastest woman, so it looks like Dawkins' statement holds water:




  • For the 100m the top performing women's all time record is 10.49s (that's faster than the Olympic record), but the 100th fastest men's record is 9.97s. In fact there are at least 1686 male athletes with times faster than the women's record (they are 10.30s or faster) (the IAAF website doesn't have records beyond 1686 for the men's 100m).


  • 200m, women's record is 21.34, there are 1544 men with records 20.70 or faster


  • 400m, women's record is 47.60, there are 709 men's records 45.50 or faster


  • 800m, women's record is 1:53.28, there are 657 men's records 1:46 or faster


  • 1,500m women's record is 3:50.07, there are 938 men's records 3:38 or faster


  • 5,000m women's record is 14:11.15, there are 1262 men's records 13:30 or faster


  • 10,000m women's record is 29:17.45, there are 1085 men's records 28:09.98 or faster


  • Marathon, women's record is 2:15:52, there are 1883 men's records 2:12:00 or faster


  • 400m hurdles, women's record is 52.34, there are 889 men's records 50.00 or faster


  • 3,000m steeplechase, women's record is 8:44.32, there are 809 men's records 8:30 or faster


  • 4x100m relay, women's record is 40.82, there are only 73 men's records in total, all 38.48 or faster


  • 4x400m relay, women's record is 3:15.17, there are only 87 men's records in total, all 3:02 or faster


  • 20k walk, women's record is 1:23:39, there are 546 men's records 1:23:00 or faster


  • High jump, women's record is 2.09, there are 625 men's records 2.25 or higher


  • Long jump, women's record is 7.52, there are 818 men's records 8.00 or longer


  • Pole vault, women's record is 5.06, there are 655 men's records 5.50 or higher


  • Triple jump, women's record is 15.50, there are 516 men's records 16.80 or longer







share|improve this answer










New contributor




Xen2050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 20




    This shows that the top male athlete could beat the top female athlete. It doesn't match the claim - that even the 100th "best" male athlete could beat the top female athletes.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 5




    It is a particularly strange quote, claiming that out of the top 100 athletes in "almost any / most sports", that every man would beat every women... but the Olympic records are well verified and recorded and easily compared, probably the best "data" available, I don't know where to find the top 10 or top 100 Olympic results, but I would be skeptical if they were significantly different from the top records
    – Xen2050
    yesterday






  • 3




    @Xen2050 You're not comparing 100th to 100th. You're comparing 100th to 1st.
    – wizzwizz4
    yesterday






  • 3




    everything except the discus throw - and negligible advantages on shot putting and hammer throwing.... except that they use differently weighted objects per sex, so all the numbers for those are meaningless.
    – Mazura
    yesterday






  • 5




    @Mazura I think the fact that the throwing events usually have such a drastic weight difference actually speaks volumes.
    – Xen2050
    yesterday



















1














The question can not be honestly answered as it is stated remarkably imprecise ( in more than two instances ).



Success in "sport" disciplines depend on sportive qualities that are distinct from each other ranging from fast strategic thinking (chess) over teamwork (i.e. climbing, ice-stick shooting, curling and alike team sports) to athletic capabilities.



While many of these qualities are not tangled to sex, muscular strength, fast power and endurance performance are.

There are physiological differences in muscular composition between males and females in homo sapiens that are rooted in sex driven hormonal differences that beside direct impact interact in various ways with growth and motoric ability. Some of these sex differences might be overcome by hormonal substitution combined with training at least in young fit individuals (this is because the bone composition / tendonous apparatus needs to adapt to muscular strength and the timeframe for bone composition change is early in lifespan).



Therefore only in "sports" that depend foremost on power of the muscular skeletal system in a challenge of comparable conditioned man and women, the males are unlikely to be beaten even by exceptional strong females i.e. olympic weightlifting (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympic_weightlifting)



Some selective literature:



Sex-Based Differences in Skeletal Muscle Kinetics and Fiber-Type Composition
K. M. Haizlip, B. C. Harrison, L. A. Leinwand
Physiology (Bethesda) 2015 Jan; 30(1): 30–39. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00024.2014
PMCID: PMC4285578



The exercise sex gap and the impact of the estrous cycle on exercise performance in mice
Aderbal S. Aguiar, Jr, Ana Elisa Speck, Inês M. Amaral, Paula M. Canas, Rodrigo A. Cunha
Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 10742. Published online 2018 Jul 16. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29050-0
PMCID: PMC6048134



Sex-Related Differences in Muscle Composition and Motor Unit Firing Rates of the First Dorsal Interosseous: 114 Board; Wray, Mandy & Sterczala, Adam & Miller, Jonathan & L. Dimmick, Hannah & Herda, Trent. (2018) #3 May 30 9. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 50. 8. 10.1249/01.mss.0000535111.46582.39.



Sex-Related Differences in Gene Expression in Human Skeletal Muscle
Stephen Welle, Rabi Tawil, Charles A. Thornton
PLoS One. 2008; 3(1): e1385. Published online 2008 Jan 2. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001385






share|improve this answer



















  • 11




    -1: The quote is about sexual dimorphism in humans and how it compares to other animals. The first two (three?) articles are based on non-human animal models. So they don't support your answer. I agree that the claim is imprecise, but I don't think you've shown that.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday








  • 6




    -1 "Some of these sex differences might be overcome by hormonal substitution" So you're saying that to get over the differences of men and women, partially turn the women into men? You seem to be missing the point.
    – UKMonkey
    20 hours ago











protected by Community 19 hours ago



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









95














Expanding on Xen2050's information, the wikipedia List of Olympic records in Athletics page has links to each individual sport, listing the top 25 results by gender. I've compiled the information showing the 25th-best men's result vs. the best women's result. (I skipped the 110m hurdles since they are not directly comparable.) This does not prove the claim (top 100 men vs. top 100 women) but it does give a better feel for the discrepancy between genders in the results:



Sport:              25th-ranked men's result:   top-ranked women's result:
100m 9.87 10.49
200m 19.80 21.34
400m 44.10 47.60
800m 1:42.81 1:53.28
1500m 3:29.59 3:50.07
5000m 12:51.00 14:11.15
10000m 26:49.94 29:17.45
Marathon 2:04:32 2:15:25
400m Hurdle 47.67 52.34
3000m Steeplechase 8:04.95 8:44.32
4x100 Relay 37.58 (*) 40.82
4x400 Relay 2:57.87 3:15.17
20k Walk 1:18:06 1:23:39
50k Walk 3:36:20 (**) 4:05:56
High Jump 2.38m 2.09m
Long Jump 8.51m 7.52m
Pole Vault 5.98m 5.06m
Triple Jump 17.75m 15.50m
-- these events use different equipment:
Shot Put (+) 22.08m 22.63m (would get 10th place on men's listing)
Discus Throw (+) 69.95m 76.80m (would get 1st place on men's listing)
Hammer Throw (+) 82.54m 82.98m (would get 19th place on men's listing)
Javelin Throw (+) 89.02m 72.28m
Decathlon (+) 8663 points 8358 points


notes:

(*): 20th-place result; lower results not available

(**): 10th-place result; lower results not available

(+): the equipment used is different between men and women. For example, the men's discus weighs 2kg and is 22cm in diameter, while the women's discus weighs 1kg and is 18cm in diameter. The shots, hammers and javelins are also lighter for the women's events. Therefore, these events are not really directly comparable.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Hellion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 9




    It would be great to expand this to include non track&field sports where they are quantifiable and comparable... swimming, weight lifting, canoe/kayak, cycling. (Annoyingly, it looks like men's and women's events use different courses for skiing, so it's not a good comparison.) One other thing to note, in the Olympic equestrian events where men and women compete directly, women do make it onto the teams and onto the podium.
    – user3067860
    yesterday






  • 10




    Ultra-marathons: 1st woman ranks 6th in men's list for 100 mile. ultrarunning.com/featured/ultrarunning-magazine-all-time-lists. For 3100 miles: 1st woman ranks 2nd in men's list. For 1000 mile, 1st woman ranks 7th in men's list.
    – Chloe
    yesterday








  • 29




    @SebastiaanvandenBroek because the lists on Wikipedia only went to 25th place.
    – Hellion
    yesterday






  • 7




    @Chloe - it is of note that this is almost certainly due to very low competitiveness of ultramarathons (7% difference between #1 and #10).
    – Davor
    yesterday






  • 4




    I would argue Decathlon is not really directly comparable as well, as the men and women use different scoring tables, contains the various throwing events with different equipment weights as mentioned in answer, has 110m hurdles for men and 100m hurdles for women, and (less importantly) the decathlon has primarily been replaced by the heptathlon for the top tier of women, as the women's heptathlon is the combined athletics event at the Olympics and other top meets instead of the decathlon.
    – Jimmy M.
    22 hours ago
















95














Expanding on Xen2050's information, the wikipedia List of Olympic records in Athletics page has links to each individual sport, listing the top 25 results by gender. I've compiled the information showing the 25th-best men's result vs. the best women's result. (I skipped the 110m hurdles since they are not directly comparable.) This does not prove the claim (top 100 men vs. top 100 women) but it does give a better feel for the discrepancy between genders in the results:



Sport:              25th-ranked men's result:   top-ranked women's result:
100m 9.87 10.49
200m 19.80 21.34
400m 44.10 47.60
800m 1:42.81 1:53.28
1500m 3:29.59 3:50.07
5000m 12:51.00 14:11.15
10000m 26:49.94 29:17.45
Marathon 2:04:32 2:15:25
400m Hurdle 47.67 52.34
3000m Steeplechase 8:04.95 8:44.32
4x100 Relay 37.58 (*) 40.82
4x400 Relay 2:57.87 3:15.17
20k Walk 1:18:06 1:23:39
50k Walk 3:36:20 (**) 4:05:56
High Jump 2.38m 2.09m
Long Jump 8.51m 7.52m
Pole Vault 5.98m 5.06m
Triple Jump 17.75m 15.50m
-- these events use different equipment:
Shot Put (+) 22.08m 22.63m (would get 10th place on men's listing)
Discus Throw (+) 69.95m 76.80m (would get 1st place on men's listing)
Hammer Throw (+) 82.54m 82.98m (would get 19th place on men's listing)
Javelin Throw (+) 89.02m 72.28m
Decathlon (+) 8663 points 8358 points


notes:

(*): 20th-place result; lower results not available

(**): 10th-place result; lower results not available

(+): the equipment used is different between men and women. For example, the men's discus weighs 2kg and is 22cm in diameter, while the women's discus weighs 1kg and is 18cm in diameter. The shots, hammers and javelins are also lighter for the women's events. Therefore, these events are not really directly comparable.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Hellion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 9




    It would be great to expand this to include non track&field sports where they are quantifiable and comparable... swimming, weight lifting, canoe/kayak, cycling. (Annoyingly, it looks like men's and women's events use different courses for skiing, so it's not a good comparison.) One other thing to note, in the Olympic equestrian events where men and women compete directly, women do make it onto the teams and onto the podium.
    – user3067860
    yesterday






  • 10




    Ultra-marathons: 1st woman ranks 6th in men's list for 100 mile. ultrarunning.com/featured/ultrarunning-magazine-all-time-lists. For 3100 miles: 1st woman ranks 2nd in men's list. For 1000 mile, 1st woman ranks 7th in men's list.
    – Chloe
    yesterday








  • 29




    @SebastiaanvandenBroek because the lists on Wikipedia only went to 25th place.
    – Hellion
    yesterday






  • 7




    @Chloe - it is of note that this is almost certainly due to very low competitiveness of ultramarathons (7% difference between #1 and #10).
    – Davor
    yesterday






  • 4




    I would argue Decathlon is not really directly comparable as well, as the men and women use different scoring tables, contains the various throwing events with different equipment weights as mentioned in answer, has 110m hurdles for men and 100m hurdles for women, and (less importantly) the decathlon has primarily been replaced by the heptathlon for the top tier of women, as the women's heptathlon is the combined athletics event at the Olympics and other top meets instead of the decathlon.
    – Jimmy M.
    22 hours ago














95












95








95






Expanding on Xen2050's information, the wikipedia List of Olympic records in Athletics page has links to each individual sport, listing the top 25 results by gender. I've compiled the information showing the 25th-best men's result vs. the best women's result. (I skipped the 110m hurdles since they are not directly comparable.) This does not prove the claim (top 100 men vs. top 100 women) but it does give a better feel for the discrepancy between genders in the results:



Sport:              25th-ranked men's result:   top-ranked women's result:
100m 9.87 10.49
200m 19.80 21.34
400m 44.10 47.60
800m 1:42.81 1:53.28
1500m 3:29.59 3:50.07
5000m 12:51.00 14:11.15
10000m 26:49.94 29:17.45
Marathon 2:04:32 2:15:25
400m Hurdle 47.67 52.34
3000m Steeplechase 8:04.95 8:44.32
4x100 Relay 37.58 (*) 40.82
4x400 Relay 2:57.87 3:15.17
20k Walk 1:18:06 1:23:39
50k Walk 3:36:20 (**) 4:05:56
High Jump 2.38m 2.09m
Long Jump 8.51m 7.52m
Pole Vault 5.98m 5.06m
Triple Jump 17.75m 15.50m
-- these events use different equipment:
Shot Put (+) 22.08m 22.63m (would get 10th place on men's listing)
Discus Throw (+) 69.95m 76.80m (would get 1st place on men's listing)
Hammer Throw (+) 82.54m 82.98m (would get 19th place on men's listing)
Javelin Throw (+) 89.02m 72.28m
Decathlon (+) 8663 points 8358 points


notes:

(*): 20th-place result; lower results not available

(**): 10th-place result; lower results not available

(+): the equipment used is different between men and women. For example, the men's discus weighs 2kg and is 22cm in diameter, while the women's discus weighs 1kg and is 18cm in diameter. The shots, hammers and javelins are also lighter for the women's events. Therefore, these events are not really directly comparable.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Hellion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









Expanding on Xen2050's information, the wikipedia List of Olympic records in Athletics page has links to each individual sport, listing the top 25 results by gender. I've compiled the information showing the 25th-best men's result vs. the best women's result. (I skipped the 110m hurdles since they are not directly comparable.) This does not prove the claim (top 100 men vs. top 100 women) but it does give a better feel for the discrepancy between genders in the results:



Sport:              25th-ranked men's result:   top-ranked women's result:
100m 9.87 10.49
200m 19.80 21.34
400m 44.10 47.60
800m 1:42.81 1:53.28
1500m 3:29.59 3:50.07
5000m 12:51.00 14:11.15
10000m 26:49.94 29:17.45
Marathon 2:04:32 2:15:25
400m Hurdle 47.67 52.34
3000m Steeplechase 8:04.95 8:44.32
4x100 Relay 37.58 (*) 40.82
4x400 Relay 2:57.87 3:15.17
20k Walk 1:18:06 1:23:39
50k Walk 3:36:20 (**) 4:05:56
High Jump 2.38m 2.09m
Long Jump 8.51m 7.52m
Pole Vault 5.98m 5.06m
Triple Jump 17.75m 15.50m
-- these events use different equipment:
Shot Put (+) 22.08m 22.63m (would get 10th place on men's listing)
Discus Throw (+) 69.95m 76.80m (would get 1st place on men's listing)
Hammer Throw (+) 82.54m 82.98m (would get 19th place on men's listing)
Javelin Throw (+) 89.02m 72.28m
Decathlon (+) 8663 points 8358 points


notes:

(*): 20th-place result; lower results not available

(**): 10th-place result; lower results not available

(+): the equipment used is different between men and women. For example, the men's discus weighs 2kg and is 22cm in diameter, while the women's discus weighs 1kg and is 18cm in diameter. The shots, hammers and javelins are also lighter for the women's events. Therefore, these events are not really directly comparable.







share|improve this answer










New contributor




Hellion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 12 hours ago





















New contributor




Hellion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered yesterday









Hellion

67636




67636




New contributor




Hellion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Hellion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Hellion is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 9




    It would be great to expand this to include non track&field sports where they are quantifiable and comparable... swimming, weight lifting, canoe/kayak, cycling. (Annoyingly, it looks like men's and women's events use different courses for skiing, so it's not a good comparison.) One other thing to note, in the Olympic equestrian events where men and women compete directly, women do make it onto the teams and onto the podium.
    – user3067860
    yesterday






  • 10




    Ultra-marathons: 1st woman ranks 6th in men's list for 100 mile. ultrarunning.com/featured/ultrarunning-magazine-all-time-lists. For 3100 miles: 1st woman ranks 2nd in men's list. For 1000 mile, 1st woman ranks 7th in men's list.
    – Chloe
    yesterday








  • 29




    @SebastiaanvandenBroek because the lists on Wikipedia only went to 25th place.
    – Hellion
    yesterday






  • 7




    @Chloe - it is of note that this is almost certainly due to very low competitiveness of ultramarathons (7% difference between #1 and #10).
    – Davor
    yesterday






  • 4




    I would argue Decathlon is not really directly comparable as well, as the men and women use different scoring tables, contains the various throwing events with different equipment weights as mentioned in answer, has 110m hurdles for men and 100m hurdles for women, and (less importantly) the decathlon has primarily been replaced by the heptathlon for the top tier of women, as the women's heptathlon is the combined athletics event at the Olympics and other top meets instead of the decathlon.
    – Jimmy M.
    22 hours ago














  • 9




    It would be great to expand this to include non track&field sports where they are quantifiable and comparable... swimming, weight lifting, canoe/kayak, cycling. (Annoyingly, it looks like men's and women's events use different courses for skiing, so it's not a good comparison.) One other thing to note, in the Olympic equestrian events where men and women compete directly, women do make it onto the teams and onto the podium.
    – user3067860
    yesterday






  • 10




    Ultra-marathons: 1st woman ranks 6th in men's list for 100 mile. ultrarunning.com/featured/ultrarunning-magazine-all-time-lists. For 3100 miles: 1st woman ranks 2nd in men's list. For 1000 mile, 1st woman ranks 7th in men's list.
    – Chloe
    yesterday








  • 29




    @SebastiaanvandenBroek because the lists on Wikipedia only went to 25th place.
    – Hellion
    yesterday






  • 7




    @Chloe - it is of note that this is almost certainly due to very low competitiveness of ultramarathons (7% difference between #1 and #10).
    – Davor
    yesterday






  • 4




    I would argue Decathlon is not really directly comparable as well, as the men and women use different scoring tables, contains the various throwing events with different equipment weights as mentioned in answer, has 110m hurdles for men and 100m hurdles for women, and (less importantly) the decathlon has primarily been replaced by the heptathlon for the top tier of women, as the women's heptathlon is the combined athletics event at the Olympics and other top meets instead of the decathlon.
    – Jimmy M.
    22 hours ago








9




9




It would be great to expand this to include non track&field sports where they are quantifiable and comparable... swimming, weight lifting, canoe/kayak, cycling. (Annoyingly, it looks like men's and women's events use different courses for skiing, so it's not a good comparison.) One other thing to note, in the Olympic equestrian events where men and women compete directly, women do make it onto the teams and onto the podium.
– user3067860
yesterday




It would be great to expand this to include non track&field sports where they are quantifiable and comparable... swimming, weight lifting, canoe/kayak, cycling. (Annoyingly, it looks like men's and women's events use different courses for skiing, so it's not a good comparison.) One other thing to note, in the Olympic equestrian events where men and women compete directly, women do make it onto the teams and onto the podium.
– user3067860
yesterday




10




10




Ultra-marathons: 1st woman ranks 6th in men's list for 100 mile. ultrarunning.com/featured/ultrarunning-magazine-all-time-lists. For 3100 miles: 1st woman ranks 2nd in men's list. For 1000 mile, 1st woman ranks 7th in men's list.
– Chloe
yesterday






Ultra-marathons: 1st woman ranks 6th in men's list for 100 mile. ultrarunning.com/featured/ultrarunning-magazine-all-time-lists. For 3100 miles: 1st woman ranks 2nd in men's list. For 1000 mile, 1st woman ranks 7th in men's list.
– Chloe
yesterday






29




29




@SebastiaanvandenBroek because the lists on Wikipedia only went to 25th place.
– Hellion
yesterday




@SebastiaanvandenBroek because the lists on Wikipedia only went to 25th place.
– Hellion
yesterday




7




7




@Chloe - it is of note that this is almost certainly due to very low competitiveness of ultramarathons (7% difference between #1 and #10).
– Davor
yesterday




@Chloe - it is of note that this is almost certainly due to very low competitiveness of ultramarathons (7% difference between #1 and #10).
– Davor
yesterday




4




4




I would argue Decathlon is not really directly comparable as well, as the men and women use different scoring tables, contains the various throwing events with different equipment weights as mentioned in answer, has 110m hurdles for men and 100m hurdles for women, and (less importantly) the decathlon has primarily been replaced by the heptathlon for the top tier of women, as the women's heptathlon is the combined athletics event at the Olympics and other top meets instead of the decathlon.
– Jimmy M.
22 hours ago




I would argue Decathlon is not really directly comparable as well, as the men and women use different scoring tables, contains the various throwing events with different equipment weights as mentioned in answer, has 110m hurdles for men and 100m hurdles for women, and (less importantly) the decathlon has primarily been replaced by the heptathlon for the top tier of women, as the women's heptathlon is the combined athletics event at the Olympics and other top meets instead of the decathlon.
– Jimmy M.
22 hours ago











74














On the evidence of the IAAF, the 100th best male athlete is significantly faster and/or stronger than a female. Here are a few examples:



Event     100th Man  1st Woman   Eq male rank
100m 10.15 10.85 3,460th
1500m 3:38.28 3:56.68 > 3,143th (a)
Marathon 2:08:46 2:18:11 797th
High Jump 2.23 2.04 1,085th
Long Jump 7.91 7.05 1,898th
Javelin 77.27 68.92 437th (b)


Note (a): There are only 3,143 entries for the men's 1500m, the slowest being 3:56.00 seconds.
(b) The men's javelin is longer and 33% heavier.



The World Swimming Rankings tell a similar story, but also give one example of an exception. Katie Ledecky's time for the 1500m Freestyle ranks her 72nd among the men. She is clearly an outstanding swimmer, as she is 31 seconds, or one full length, faster than her nearest female rival. She also competes in the 400m and 800m, where she is outside the top 100 men and her times are closer to other women's.



Given that men are more athletic at athletics, they should have the same advantage in team games such as football or rugby, but direct competitions, and therefore comparisons, aren't available.



However, this article has some revealing opinions from champions of both sexes into men's vs. women's tennis.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Boodysaspie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 24




    @Richard Yes, a female athlete from a country with a strong culture of sprinting can beat a man from Tuvalu or Kiribati, if he's qualifying and she's sprinting at a final pace. Her qualifying times would not have been successful in any male heat, her semifinal time was too slow to qualify for the men's final and her final time would have left her embarrassingly last against the men.
    – Boodysaspie
    yesterday






  • 17




    @Richard You're making the assumption that the people present were the top 100 people, which is almost certainly false. A tiny island nation is very unlikely to have one of the top 100, while very large nations (especially highly-developed ones) may have many of the top 100 people, even though only a few of them could participate in the Olympics.
    – reirab
    yesterday






  • 11




    @Richard There were 22 sprinters in the Men's preliminary heat and the fastest time was 10.43. That likely wouldn't have qualified the sprinter in the top 100 for last years US College Track & Field season (#1 was 9.93, #25 was 10.14). The preliminaries weren't for top 100 sprinters, they were for tiny countries who didn't have world class sprinters. The women's preliminaries only had two sprinters break 12 seconds. Seven couldn't break 13 seconds, three of which couldn't break 14 seconds.
    – SafeFastExpressive
    yesterday






  • 4




    @Richard Don't forget the Olympics places restrictions on number of athletes per country. If Country A has the top 100 sprinters in the world, they can still only send 3 sprinters. Whoever placed 4th at the Olympics therefore would probably still only be the 101st fastest sprinter worldwide in such an example.
    – Jimmy M.
    22 hours ago






  • 6




    @Richard, this data appears to actually support the claim made by Dawkins. All 62 of the men who met the qualifying standard for the event ran faster than the winner from the women's field. As others have pointed out, the 22 prelim runners are likely not actually in the top 100 while some of the "true" top 100 did qualify for the Olympics because they were behind faster runners from their home country. All 33 men beat the women's world record at the US qualifying event, but only 3 went to the Olympics tfrrs.org/results/46783/2887543/2016_U.S._Olympic_Trials/…
    – Mark Peterson
    22 hours ago
















74














On the evidence of the IAAF, the 100th best male athlete is significantly faster and/or stronger than a female. Here are a few examples:



Event     100th Man  1st Woman   Eq male rank
100m 10.15 10.85 3,460th
1500m 3:38.28 3:56.68 > 3,143th (a)
Marathon 2:08:46 2:18:11 797th
High Jump 2.23 2.04 1,085th
Long Jump 7.91 7.05 1,898th
Javelin 77.27 68.92 437th (b)


Note (a): There are only 3,143 entries for the men's 1500m, the slowest being 3:56.00 seconds.
(b) The men's javelin is longer and 33% heavier.



The World Swimming Rankings tell a similar story, but also give one example of an exception. Katie Ledecky's time for the 1500m Freestyle ranks her 72nd among the men. She is clearly an outstanding swimmer, as she is 31 seconds, or one full length, faster than her nearest female rival. She also competes in the 400m and 800m, where she is outside the top 100 men and her times are closer to other women's.



Given that men are more athletic at athletics, they should have the same advantage in team games such as football or rugby, but direct competitions, and therefore comparisons, aren't available.



However, this article has some revealing opinions from champions of both sexes into men's vs. women's tennis.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Boodysaspie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 24




    @Richard Yes, a female athlete from a country with a strong culture of sprinting can beat a man from Tuvalu or Kiribati, if he's qualifying and she's sprinting at a final pace. Her qualifying times would not have been successful in any male heat, her semifinal time was too slow to qualify for the men's final and her final time would have left her embarrassingly last against the men.
    – Boodysaspie
    yesterday






  • 17




    @Richard You're making the assumption that the people present were the top 100 people, which is almost certainly false. A tiny island nation is very unlikely to have one of the top 100, while very large nations (especially highly-developed ones) may have many of the top 100 people, even though only a few of them could participate in the Olympics.
    – reirab
    yesterday






  • 11




    @Richard There were 22 sprinters in the Men's preliminary heat and the fastest time was 10.43. That likely wouldn't have qualified the sprinter in the top 100 for last years US College Track & Field season (#1 was 9.93, #25 was 10.14). The preliminaries weren't for top 100 sprinters, they were for tiny countries who didn't have world class sprinters. The women's preliminaries only had two sprinters break 12 seconds. Seven couldn't break 13 seconds, three of which couldn't break 14 seconds.
    – SafeFastExpressive
    yesterday






  • 4




    @Richard Don't forget the Olympics places restrictions on number of athletes per country. If Country A has the top 100 sprinters in the world, they can still only send 3 sprinters. Whoever placed 4th at the Olympics therefore would probably still only be the 101st fastest sprinter worldwide in such an example.
    – Jimmy M.
    22 hours ago






  • 6




    @Richard, this data appears to actually support the claim made by Dawkins. All 62 of the men who met the qualifying standard for the event ran faster than the winner from the women's field. As others have pointed out, the 22 prelim runners are likely not actually in the top 100 while some of the "true" top 100 did qualify for the Olympics because they were behind faster runners from their home country. All 33 men beat the women's world record at the US qualifying event, but only 3 went to the Olympics tfrrs.org/results/46783/2887543/2016_U.S._Olympic_Trials/…
    – Mark Peterson
    22 hours ago














74












74








74






On the evidence of the IAAF, the 100th best male athlete is significantly faster and/or stronger than a female. Here are a few examples:



Event     100th Man  1st Woman   Eq male rank
100m 10.15 10.85 3,460th
1500m 3:38.28 3:56.68 > 3,143th (a)
Marathon 2:08:46 2:18:11 797th
High Jump 2.23 2.04 1,085th
Long Jump 7.91 7.05 1,898th
Javelin 77.27 68.92 437th (b)


Note (a): There are only 3,143 entries for the men's 1500m, the slowest being 3:56.00 seconds.
(b) The men's javelin is longer and 33% heavier.



The World Swimming Rankings tell a similar story, but also give one example of an exception. Katie Ledecky's time for the 1500m Freestyle ranks her 72nd among the men. She is clearly an outstanding swimmer, as she is 31 seconds, or one full length, faster than her nearest female rival. She also competes in the 400m and 800m, where she is outside the top 100 men and her times are closer to other women's.



Given that men are more athletic at athletics, they should have the same advantage in team games such as football or rugby, but direct competitions, and therefore comparisons, aren't available.



However, this article has some revealing opinions from champions of both sexes into men's vs. women's tennis.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Boodysaspie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









On the evidence of the IAAF, the 100th best male athlete is significantly faster and/or stronger than a female. Here are a few examples:



Event     100th Man  1st Woman   Eq male rank
100m 10.15 10.85 3,460th
1500m 3:38.28 3:56.68 > 3,143th (a)
Marathon 2:08:46 2:18:11 797th
High Jump 2.23 2.04 1,085th
Long Jump 7.91 7.05 1,898th
Javelin 77.27 68.92 437th (b)


Note (a): There are only 3,143 entries for the men's 1500m, the slowest being 3:56.00 seconds.
(b) The men's javelin is longer and 33% heavier.



The World Swimming Rankings tell a similar story, but also give one example of an exception. Katie Ledecky's time for the 1500m Freestyle ranks her 72nd among the men. She is clearly an outstanding swimmer, as she is 31 seconds, or one full length, faster than her nearest female rival. She also competes in the 400m and 800m, where she is outside the top 100 men and her times are closer to other women's.



Given that men are more athletic at athletics, they should have the same advantage in team games such as football or rugby, but direct competitions, and therefore comparisons, aren't available.



However, this article has some revealing opinions from champions of both sexes into men's vs. women's tennis.







share|improve this answer










New contributor




Boodysaspie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday





















New contributor




Boodysaspie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered yesterday









Boodysaspie

57114




57114




New contributor




Boodysaspie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Boodysaspie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Boodysaspie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 24




    @Richard Yes, a female athlete from a country with a strong culture of sprinting can beat a man from Tuvalu or Kiribati, if he's qualifying and she's sprinting at a final pace. Her qualifying times would not have been successful in any male heat, her semifinal time was too slow to qualify for the men's final and her final time would have left her embarrassingly last against the men.
    – Boodysaspie
    yesterday






  • 17




    @Richard You're making the assumption that the people present were the top 100 people, which is almost certainly false. A tiny island nation is very unlikely to have one of the top 100, while very large nations (especially highly-developed ones) may have many of the top 100 people, even though only a few of them could participate in the Olympics.
    – reirab
    yesterday






  • 11




    @Richard There were 22 sprinters in the Men's preliminary heat and the fastest time was 10.43. That likely wouldn't have qualified the sprinter in the top 100 for last years US College Track & Field season (#1 was 9.93, #25 was 10.14). The preliminaries weren't for top 100 sprinters, they were for tiny countries who didn't have world class sprinters. The women's preliminaries only had two sprinters break 12 seconds. Seven couldn't break 13 seconds, three of which couldn't break 14 seconds.
    – SafeFastExpressive
    yesterday






  • 4




    @Richard Don't forget the Olympics places restrictions on number of athletes per country. If Country A has the top 100 sprinters in the world, they can still only send 3 sprinters. Whoever placed 4th at the Olympics therefore would probably still only be the 101st fastest sprinter worldwide in such an example.
    – Jimmy M.
    22 hours ago






  • 6




    @Richard, this data appears to actually support the claim made by Dawkins. All 62 of the men who met the qualifying standard for the event ran faster than the winner from the women's field. As others have pointed out, the 22 prelim runners are likely not actually in the top 100 while some of the "true" top 100 did qualify for the Olympics because they were behind faster runners from their home country. All 33 men beat the women's world record at the US qualifying event, but only 3 went to the Olympics tfrrs.org/results/46783/2887543/2016_U.S._Olympic_Trials/…
    – Mark Peterson
    22 hours ago














  • 24




    @Richard Yes, a female athlete from a country with a strong culture of sprinting can beat a man from Tuvalu or Kiribati, if he's qualifying and she's sprinting at a final pace. Her qualifying times would not have been successful in any male heat, her semifinal time was too slow to qualify for the men's final and her final time would have left her embarrassingly last against the men.
    – Boodysaspie
    yesterday






  • 17




    @Richard You're making the assumption that the people present were the top 100 people, which is almost certainly false. A tiny island nation is very unlikely to have one of the top 100, while very large nations (especially highly-developed ones) may have many of the top 100 people, even though only a few of them could participate in the Olympics.
    – reirab
    yesterday






  • 11




    @Richard There were 22 sprinters in the Men's preliminary heat and the fastest time was 10.43. That likely wouldn't have qualified the sprinter in the top 100 for last years US College Track & Field season (#1 was 9.93, #25 was 10.14). The preliminaries weren't for top 100 sprinters, they were for tiny countries who didn't have world class sprinters. The women's preliminaries only had two sprinters break 12 seconds. Seven couldn't break 13 seconds, three of which couldn't break 14 seconds.
    – SafeFastExpressive
    yesterday






  • 4




    @Richard Don't forget the Olympics places restrictions on number of athletes per country. If Country A has the top 100 sprinters in the world, they can still only send 3 sprinters. Whoever placed 4th at the Olympics therefore would probably still only be the 101st fastest sprinter worldwide in such an example.
    – Jimmy M.
    22 hours ago






  • 6




    @Richard, this data appears to actually support the claim made by Dawkins. All 62 of the men who met the qualifying standard for the event ran faster than the winner from the women's field. As others have pointed out, the 22 prelim runners are likely not actually in the top 100 while some of the "true" top 100 did qualify for the Olympics because they were behind faster runners from their home country. All 33 men beat the women's world record at the US qualifying event, but only 3 went to the Olympics tfrrs.org/results/46783/2887543/2016_U.S._Olympic_Trials/…
    – Mark Peterson
    22 hours ago








24




24




@Richard Yes, a female athlete from a country with a strong culture of sprinting can beat a man from Tuvalu or Kiribati, if he's qualifying and she's sprinting at a final pace. Her qualifying times would not have been successful in any male heat, her semifinal time was too slow to qualify for the men's final and her final time would have left her embarrassingly last against the men.
– Boodysaspie
yesterday




@Richard Yes, a female athlete from a country with a strong culture of sprinting can beat a man from Tuvalu or Kiribati, if he's qualifying and she's sprinting at a final pace. Her qualifying times would not have been successful in any male heat, her semifinal time was too slow to qualify for the men's final and her final time would have left her embarrassingly last against the men.
– Boodysaspie
yesterday




17




17




@Richard You're making the assumption that the people present were the top 100 people, which is almost certainly false. A tiny island nation is very unlikely to have one of the top 100, while very large nations (especially highly-developed ones) may have many of the top 100 people, even though only a few of them could participate in the Olympics.
– reirab
yesterday




@Richard You're making the assumption that the people present were the top 100 people, which is almost certainly false. A tiny island nation is very unlikely to have one of the top 100, while very large nations (especially highly-developed ones) may have many of the top 100 people, even though only a few of them could participate in the Olympics.
– reirab
yesterday




11




11




@Richard There were 22 sprinters in the Men's preliminary heat and the fastest time was 10.43. That likely wouldn't have qualified the sprinter in the top 100 for last years US College Track & Field season (#1 was 9.93, #25 was 10.14). The preliminaries weren't for top 100 sprinters, they were for tiny countries who didn't have world class sprinters. The women's preliminaries only had two sprinters break 12 seconds. Seven couldn't break 13 seconds, three of which couldn't break 14 seconds.
– SafeFastExpressive
yesterday




@Richard There were 22 sprinters in the Men's preliminary heat and the fastest time was 10.43. That likely wouldn't have qualified the sprinter in the top 100 for last years US College Track & Field season (#1 was 9.93, #25 was 10.14). The preliminaries weren't for top 100 sprinters, they were for tiny countries who didn't have world class sprinters. The women's preliminaries only had two sprinters break 12 seconds. Seven couldn't break 13 seconds, three of which couldn't break 14 seconds.
– SafeFastExpressive
yesterday




4




4




@Richard Don't forget the Olympics places restrictions on number of athletes per country. If Country A has the top 100 sprinters in the world, they can still only send 3 sprinters. Whoever placed 4th at the Olympics therefore would probably still only be the 101st fastest sprinter worldwide in such an example.
– Jimmy M.
22 hours ago




@Richard Don't forget the Olympics places restrictions on number of athletes per country. If Country A has the top 100 sprinters in the world, they can still only send 3 sprinters. Whoever placed 4th at the Olympics therefore would probably still only be the 101st fastest sprinter worldwide in such an example.
– Jimmy M.
22 hours ago




6




6




@Richard, this data appears to actually support the claim made by Dawkins. All 62 of the men who met the qualifying standard for the event ran faster than the winner from the women's field. As others have pointed out, the 22 prelim runners are likely not actually in the top 100 while some of the "true" top 100 did qualify for the Olympics because they were behind faster runners from their home country. All 33 men beat the women's world record at the US qualifying event, but only 3 went to the Olympics tfrrs.org/results/46783/2887543/2016_U.S._Olympic_Trials/…
– Mark Peterson
22 hours ago




@Richard, this data appears to actually support the claim made by Dawkins. All 62 of the men who met the qualifying standard for the event ran faster than the winner from the women's field. As others have pointed out, the 22 prelim runners are likely not actually in the top 100 while some of the "true" top 100 did qualify for the Olympics because they were behind faster runners from their home country. All 33 men beat the women's world record at the US qualifying event, but only 3 went to the Olympics tfrrs.org/results/46783/2887543/2016_U.S._Olympic_Trials/…
– Mark Peterson
22 hours ago











12














Extremes



In the fuller quote, Dawkins seems to be talking about extremes, "Lots of women are taller than lots of men, but the tallest men are taller than the tallest women." He also uses the example of racehorses, which don't compete in a team sport, but rather against each other to see which can run the fastest. Finally with "most physical sports" and "the top level in almost any sport," that's almost the literal definition of the Olympics, which Britannica.com says "[t]he Olympic Games have come to be regarded as the world’s foremost sports competition."



Therefore it makes sense to look at the extreme performance records of the Olympic games, specifically events where running times & jumping distances are easiest to compare. Not just the current athletes, but the all time records to really find the best extreme performers.



Comparing the very top record performers would show the very extremes of performance, as Dawkings was at least partially partially talking about. Here's the Olympic events & their all time records from Wikipedia's List of Olympic records in athletics, I'll try formatting them by sport, with the mens & women's records side-by-side for easier comparison:



                              Records
Event Men's Women's
===== ===== =======
100m 9.63 10.62
200 metres 19.30 ♦21.34
400 metres ♦43.03 48.25
800 metres ♦1:40.91 1:53.43
1,500 metres 3:32.07 3:53.96
5,000 metres 12:57.82 14:26.17
10,000 metres 27:01.17 ♦29:17.45
Marathon 2:06:32 2:23:07
110 metres hurdles 12.91 12.35
* only 100m hurdles for women
400 metres hurdles ♦46.78 52.64
3,000 m steeplechase 8:03.28 8:58.81
4×100 m relay ♦36.84 ♦40.82
4×400 m relay 2:55.39 ♦3:15.17
20 km walk 1:18:46 1:25:02
High jump 2.39 m 2.06 m
Long jump 8.90 m 7.40 m
Pole vault 6.03 m 5.05 m
Triple jump 18.09 m 15.39 m
(♦ denotes a performance that is also a current world record.
Statistics are correct as of 19 August 2016.)


The following events differ in the weight of the item thrown so aren't directly comparable, but given the drastic difference in weight of the items (usually half as heavy for women) yet still similar records, it seems worthy of inclusion:



Shot put                22.52 m     22.41 m
* men's shot weighs 16 lb, women's 8.8 lb
Discus throw 69.89 m 72.30 m
* men's weigh 2kg/4.4 lb, women's 1kg/2.2 lb
Hammer throw 84.80 m 82.29 m
* men's weigh 16 lb, women's 8.82 lb
Javelin throw 90.57 m 71.53 m
* men's weigh 800g/1.76 lb, women's 600g/1.32 lb


It appears that the men's records are quicker/faster/further for everything except the incomparable item throwing events. This strongly supports Dawkins' statement.



What about the next 99 athletes?



I would ask Dawkins why he chose the seemingly arbitrary number of the top 100 men & women, it could've been with the idea that there are only a few extreme performers, but the Olympic records seem to indicate that there's not only a dozen or even a hundred, but thousands of very closely performing athletes.



Looking specifically at the (arbitrary) 100th best vs the very best, using the IAAF source for Wikipedia, similar to Boodysaspie's good answer but not just looking at current athletes but all time records (or at least since electronic timing ) and not just the Olympics, gives results with usually far more than 100 men's records faster than the fastest woman, so it looks like Dawkins' statement holds water:




  • For the 100m the top performing women's all time record is 10.49s (that's faster than the Olympic record), but the 100th fastest men's record is 9.97s. In fact there are at least 1686 male athletes with times faster than the women's record (they are 10.30s or faster) (the IAAF website doesn't have records beyond 1686 for the men's 100m).


  • 200m, women's record is 21.34, there are 1544 men with records 20.70 or faster


  • 400m, women's record is 47.60, there are 709 men's records 45.50 or faster


  • 800m, women's record is 1:53.28, there are 657 men's records 1:46 or faster


  • 1,500m women's record is 3:50.07, there are 938 men's records 3:38 or faster


  • 5,000m women's record is 14:11.15, there are 1262 men's records 13:30 or faster


  • 10,000m women's record is 29:17.45, there are 1085 men's records 28:09.98 or faster


  • Marathon, women's record is 2:15:52, there are 1883 men's records 2:12:00 or faster


  • 400m hurdles, women's record is 52.34, there are 889 men's records 50.00 or faster


  • 3,000m steeplechase, women's record is 8:44.32, there are 809 men's records 8:30 or faster


  • 4x100m relay, women's record is 40.82, there are only 73 men's records in total, all 38.48 or faster


  • 4x400m relay, women's record is 3:15.17, there are only 87 men's records in total, all 3:02 or faster


  • 20k walk, women's record is 1:23:39, there are 546 men's records 1:23:00 or faster


  • High jump, women's record is 2.09, there are 625 men's records 2.25 or higher


  • Long jump, women's record is 7.52, there are 818 men's records 8.00 or longer


  • Pole vault, women's record is 5.06, there are 655 men's records 5.50 or higher


  • Triple jump, women's record is 15.50, there are 516 men's records 16.80 or longer







share|improve this answer










New contributor




Xen2050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 20




    This shows that the top male athlete could beat the top female athlete. It doesn't match the claim - that even the 100th "best" male athlete could beat the top female athletes.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 5




    It is a particularly strange quote, claiming that out of the top 100 athletes in "almost any / most sports", that every man would beat every women... but the Olympic records are well verified and recorded and easily compared, probably the best "data" available, I don't know where to find the top 10 or top 100 Olympic results, but I would be skeptical if they were significantly different from the top records
    – Xen2050
    yesterday






  • 3




    @Xen2050 You're not comparing 100th to 100th. You're comparing 100th to 1st.
    – wizzwizz4
    yesterday






  • 3




    everything except the discus throw - and negligible advantages on shot putting and hammer throwing.... except that they use differently weighted objects per sex, so all the numbers for those are meaningless.
    – Mazura
    yesterday






  • 5




    @Mazura I think the fact that the throwing events usually have such a drastic weight difference actually speaks volumes.
    – Xen2050
    yesterday
















12














Extremes



In the fuller quote, Dawkins seems to be talking about extremes, "Lots of women are taller than lots of men, but the tallest men are taller than the tallest women." He also uses the example of racehorses, which don't compete in a team sport, but rather against each other to see which can run the fastest. Finally with "most physical sports" and "the top level in almost any sport," that's almost the literal definition of the Olympics, which Britannica.com says "[t]he Olympic Games have come to be regarded as the world’s foremost sports competition."



Therefore it makes sense to look at the extreme performance records of the Olympic games, specifically events where running times & jumping distances are easiest to compare. Not just the current athletes, but the all time records to really find the best extreme performers.



Comparing the very top record performers would show the very extremes of performance, as Dawkings was at least partially partially talking about. Here's the Olympic events & their all time records from Wikipedia's List of Olympic records in athletics, I'll try formatting them by sport, with the mens & women's records side-by-side for easier comparison:



                              Records
Event Men's Women's
===== ===== =======
100m 9.63 10.62
200 metres 19.30 ♦21.34
400 metres ♦43.03 48.25
800 metres ♦1:40.91 1:53.43
1,500 metres 3:32.07 3:53.96
5,000 metres 12:57.82 14:26.17
10,000 metres 27:01.17 ♦29:17.45
Marathon 2:06:32 2:23:07
110 metres hurdles 12.91 12.35
* only 100m hurdles for women
400 metres hurdles ♦46.78 52.64
3,000 m steeplechase 8:03.28 8:58.81
4×100 m relay ♦36.84 ♦40.82
4×400 m relay 2:55.39 ♦3:15.17
20 km walk 1:18:46 1:25:02
High jump 2.39 m 2.06 m
Long jump 8.90 m 7.40 m
Pole vault 6.03 m 5.05 m
Triple jump 18.09 m 15.39 m
(♦ denotes a performance that is also a current world record.
Statistics are correct as of 19 August 2016.)


The following events differ in the weight of the item thrown so aren't directly comparable, but given the drastic difference in weight of the items (usually half as heavy for women) yet still similar records, it seems worthy of inclusion:



Shot put                22.52 m     22.41 m
* men's shot weighs 16 lb, women's 8.8 lb
Discus throw 69.89 m 72.30 m
* men's weigh 2kg/4.4 lb, women's 1kg/2.2 lb
Hammer throw 84.80 m 82.29 m
* men's weigh 16 lb, women's 8.82 lb
Javelin throw 90.57 m 71.53 m
* men's weigh 800g/1.76 lb, women's 600g/1.32 lb


It appears that the men's records are quicker/faster/further for everything except the incomparable item throwing events. This strongly supports Dawkins' statement.



What about the next 99 athletes?



I would ask Dawkins why he chose the seemingly arbitrary number of the top 100 men & women, it could've been with the idea that there are only a few extreme performers, but the Olympic records seem to indicate that there's not only a dozen or even a hundred, but thousands of very closely performing athletes.



Looking specifically at the (arbitrary) 100th best vs the very best, using the IAAF source for Wikipedia, similar to Boodysaspie's good answer but not just looking at current athletes but all time records (or at least since electronic timing ) and not just the Olympics, gives results with usually far more than 100 men's records faster than the fastest woman, so it looks like Dawkins' statement holds water:




  • For the 100m the top performing women's all time record is 10.49s (that's faster than the Olympic record), but the 100th fastest men's record is 9.97s. In fact there are at least 1686 male athletes with times faster than the women's record (they are 10.30s or faster) (the IAAF website doesn't have records beyond 1686 for the men's 100m).


  • 200m, women's record is 21.34, there are 1544 men with records 20.70 or faster


  • 400m, women's record is 47.60, there are 709 men's records 45.50 or faster


  • 800m, women's record is 1:53.28, there are 657 men's records 1:46 or faster


  • 1,500m women's record is 3:50.07, there are 938 men's records 3:38 or faster


  • 5,000m women's record is 14:11.15, there are 1262 men's records 13:30 or faster


  • 10,000m women's record is 29:17.45, there are 1085 men's records 28:09.98 or faster


  • Marathon, women's record is 2:15:52, there are 1883 men's records 2:12:00 or faster


  • 400m hurdles, women's record is 52.34, there are 889 men's records 50.00 or faster


  • 3,000m steeplechase, women's record is 8:44.32, there are 809 men's records 8:30 or faster


  • 4x100m relay, women's record is 40.82, there are only 73 men's records in total, all 38.48 or faster


  • 4x400m relay, women's record is 3:15.17, there are only 87 men's records in total, all 3:02 or faster


  • 20k walk, women's record is 1:23:39, there are 546 men's records 1:23:00 or faster


  • High jump, women's record is 2.09, there are 625 men's records 2.25 or higher


  • Long jump, women's record is 7.52, there are 818 men's records 8.00 or longer


  • Pole vault, women's record is 5.06, there are 655 men's records 5.50 or higher


  • Triple jump, women's record is 15.50, there are 516 men's records 16.80 or longer







share|improve this answer










New contributor




Xen2050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 20




    This shows that the top male athlete could beat the top female athlete. It doesn't match the claim - that even the 100th "best" male athlete could beat the top female athletes.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 5




    It is a particularly strange quote, claiming that out of the top 100 athletes in "almost any / most sports", that every man would beat every women... but the Olympic records are well verified and recorded and easily compared, probably the best "data" available, I don't know where to find the top 10 or top 100 Olympic results, but I would be skeptical if they were significantly different from the top records
    – Xen2050
    yesterday






  • 3




    @Xen2050 You're not comparing 100th to 100th. You're comparing 100th to 1st.
    – wizzwizz4
    yesterday






  • 3




    everything except the discus throw - and negligible advantages on shot putting and hammer throwing.... except that they use differently weighted objects per sex, so all the numbers for those are meaningless.
    – Mazura
    yesterday






  • 5




    @Mazura I think the fact that the throwing events usually have such a drastic weight difference actually speaks volumes.
    – Xen2050
    yesterday














12












12








12






Extremes



In the fuller quote, Dawkins seems to be talking about extremes, "Lots of women are taller than lots of men, but the tallest men are taller than the tallest women." He also uses the example of racehorses, which don't compete in a team sport, but rather against each other to see which can run the fastest. Finally with "most physical sports" and "the top level in almost any sport," that's almost the literal definition of the Olympics, which Britannica.com says "[t]he Olympic Games have come to be regarded as the world’s foremost sports competition."



Therefore it makes sense to look at the extreme performance records of the Olympic games, specifically events where running times & jumping distances are easiest to compare. Not just the current athletes, but the all time records to really find the best extreme performers.



Comparing the very top record performers would show the very extremes of performance, as Dawkings was at least partially partially talking about. Here's the Olympic events & their all time records from Wikipedia's List of Olympic records in athletics, I'll try formatting them by sport, with the mens & women's records side-by-side for easier comparison:



                              Records
Event Men's Women's
===== ===== =======
100m 9.63 10.62
200 metres 19.30 ♦21.34
400 metres ♦43.03 48.25
800 metres ♦1:40.91 1:53.43
1,500 metres 3:32.07 3:53.96
5,000 metres 12:57.82 14:26.17
10,000 metres 27:01.17 ♦29:17.45
Marathon 2:06:32 2:23:07
110 metres hurdles 12.91 12.35
* only 100m hurdles for women
400 metres hurdles ♦46.78 52.64
3,000 m steeplechase 8:03.28 8:58.81
4×100 m relay ♦36.84 ♦40.82
4×400 m relay 2:55.39 ♦3:15.17
20 km walk 1:18:46 1:25:02
High jump 2.39 m 2.06 m
Long jump 8.90 m 7.40 m
Pole vault 6.03 m 5.05 m
Triple jump 18.09 m 15.39 m
(♦ denotes a performance that is also a current world record.
Statistics are correct as of 19 August 2016.)


The following events differ in the weight of the item thrown so aren't directly comparable, but given the drastic difference in weight of the items (usually half as heavy for women) yet still similar records, it seems worthy of inclusion:



Shot put                22.52 m     22.41 m
* men's shot weighs 16 lb, women's 8.8 lb
Discus throw 69.89 m 72.30 m
* men's weigh 2kg/4.4 lb, women's 1kg/2.2 lb
Hammer throw 84.80 m 82.29 m
* men's weigh 16 lb, women's 8.82 lb
Javelin throw 90.57 m 71.53 m
* men's weigh 800g/1.76 lb, women's 600g/1.32 lb


It appears that the men's records are quicker/faster/further for everything except the incomparable item throwing events. This strongly supports Dawkins' statement.



What about the next 99 athletes?



I would ask Dawkins why he chose the seemingly arbitrary number of the top 100 men & women, it could've been with the idea that there are only a few extreme performers, but the Olympic records seem to indicate that there's not only a dozen or even a hundred, but thousands of very closely performing athletes.



Looking specifically at the (arbitrary) 100th best vs the very best, using the IAAF source for Wikipedia, similar to Boodysaspie's good answer but not just looking at current athletes but all time records (or at least since electronic timing ) and not just the Olympics, gives results with usually far more than 100 men's records faster than the fastest woman, so it looks like Dawkins' statement holds water:




  • For the 100m the top performing women's all time record is 10.49s (that's faster than the Olympic record), but the 100th fastest men's record is 9.97s. In fact there are at least 1686 male athletes with times faster than the women's record (they are 10.30s or faster) (the IAAF website doesn't have records beyond 1686 for the men's 100m).


  • 200m, women's record is 21.34, there are 1544 men with records 20.70 or faster


  • 400m, women's record is 47.60, there are 709 men's records 45.50 or faster


  • 800m, women's record is 1:53.28, there are 657 men's records 1:46 or faster


  • 1,500m women's record is 3:50.07, there are 938 men's records 3:38 or faster


  • 5,000m women's record is 14:11.15, there are 1262 men's records 13:30 or faster


  • 10,000m women's record is 29:17.45, there are 1085 men's records 28:09.98 or faster


  • Marathon, women's record is 2:15:52, there are 1883 men's records 2:12:00 or faster


  • 400m hurdles, women's record is 52.34, there are 889 men's records 50.00 or faster


  • 3,000m steeplechase, women's record is 8:44.32, there are 809 men's records 8:30 or faster


  • 4x100m relay, women's record is 40.82, there are only 73 men's records in total, all 38.48 or faster


  • 4x400m relay, women's record is 3:15.17, there are only 87 men's records in total, all 3:02 or faster


  • 20k walk, women's record is 1:23:39, there are 546 men's records 1:23:00 or faster


  • High jump, women's record is 2.09, there are 625 men's records 2.25 or higher


  • Long jump, women's record is 7.52, there are 818 men's records 8.00 or longer


  • Pole vault, women's record is 5.06, there are 655 men's records 5.50 or higher


  • Triple jump, women's record is 15.50, there are 516 men's records 16.80 or longer







share|improve this answer










New contributor




Xen2050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









Extremes



In the fuller quote, Dawkins seems to be talking about extremes, "Lots of women are taller than lots of men, but the tallest men are taller than the tallest women." He also uses the example of racehorses, which don't compete in a team sport, but rather against each other to see which can run the fastest. Finally with "most physical sports" and "the top level in almost any sport," that's almost the literal definition of the Olympics, which Britannica.com says "[t]he Olympic Games have come to be regarded as the world’s foremost sports competition."



Therefore it makes sense to look at the extreme performance records of the Olympic games, specifically events where running times & jumping distances are easiest to compare. Not just the current athletes, but the all time records to really find the best extreme performers.



Comparing the very top record performers would show the very extremes of performance, as Dawkings was at least partially partially talking about. Here's the Olympic events & their all time records from Wikipedia's List of Olympic records in athletics, I'll try formatting them by sport, with the mens & women's records side-by-side for easier comparison:



                              Records
Event Men's Women's
===== ===== =======
100m 9.63 10.62
200 metres 19.30 ♦21.34
400 metres ♦43.03 48.25
800 metres ♦1:40.91 1:53.43
1,500 metres 3:32.07 3:53.96
5,000 metres 12:57.82 14:26.17
10,000 metres 27:01.17 ♦29:17.45
Marathon 2:06:32 2:23:07
110 metres hurdles 12.91 12.35
* only 100m hurdles for women
400 metres hurdles ♦46.78 52.64
3,000 m steeplechase 8:03.28 8:58.81
4×100 m relay ♦36.84 ♦40.82
4×400 m relay 2:55.39 ♦3:15.17
20 km walk 1:18:46 1:25:02
High jump 2.39 m 2.06 m
Long jump 8.90 m 7.40 m
Pole vault 6.03 m 5.05 m
Triple jump 18.09 m 15.39 m
(♦ denotes a performance that is also a current world record.
Statistics are correct as of 19 August 2016.)


The following events differ in the weight of the item thrown so aren't directly comparable, but given the drastic difference in weight of the items (usually half as heavy for women) yet still similar records, it seems worthy of inclusion:



Shot put                22.52 m     22.41 m
* men's shot weighs 16 lb, women's 8.8 lb
Discus throw 69.89 m 72.30 m
* men's weigh 2kg/4.4 lb, women's 1kg/2.2 lb
Hammer throw 84.80 m 82.29 m
* men's weigh 16 lb, women's 8.82 lb
Javelin throw 90.57 m 71.53 m
* men's weigh 800g/1.76 lb, women's 600g/1.32 lb


It appears that the men's records are quicker/faster/further for everything except the incomparable item throwing events. This strongly supports Dawkins' statement.



What about the next 99 athletes?



I would ask Dawkins why he chose the seemingly arbitrary number of the top 100 men & women, it could've been with the idea that there are only a few extreme performers, but the Olympic records seem to indicate that there's not only a dozen or even a hundred, but thousands of very closely performing athletes.



Looking specifically at the (arbitrary) 100th best vs the very best, using the IAAF source for Wikipedia, similar to Boodysaspie's good answer but not just looking at current athletes but all time records (or at least since electronic timing ) and not just the Olympics, gives results with usually far more than 100 men's records faster than the fastest woman, so it looks like Dawkins' statement holds water:




  • For the 100m the top performing women's all time record is 10.49s (that's faster than the Olympic record), but the 100th fastest men's record is 9.97s. In fact there are at least 1686 male athletes with times faster than the women's record (they are 10.30s or faster) (the IAAF website doesn't have records beyond 1686 for the men's 100m).


  • 200m, women's record is 21.34, there are 1544 men with records 20.70 or faster


  • 400m, women's record is 47.60, there are 709 men's records 45.50 or faster


  • 800m, women's record is 1:53.28, there are 657 men's records 1:46 or faster


  • 1,500m women's record is 3:50.07, there are 938 men's records 3:38 or faster


  • 5,000m women's record is 14:11.15, there are 1262 men's records 13:30 or faster


  • 10,000m women's record is 29:17.45, there are 1085 men's records 28:09.98 or faster


  • Marathon, women's record is 2:15:52, there are 1883 men's records 2:12:00 or faster


  • 400m hurdles, women's record is 52.34, there are 889 men's records 50.00 or faster


  • 3,000m steeplechase, women's record is 8:44.32, there are 809 men's records 8:30 or faster


  • 4x100m relay, women's record is 40.82, there are only 73 men's records in total, all 38.48 or faster


  • 4x400m relay, women's record is 3:15.17, there are only 87 men's records in total, all 3:02 or faster


  • 20k walk, women's record is 1:23:39, there are 546 men's records 1:23:00 or faster


  • High jump, women's record is 2.09, there are 625 men's records 2.25 or higher


  • Long jump, women's record is 7.52, there are 818 men's records 8.00 or longer


  • Pole vault, women's record is 5.06, there are 655 men's records 5.50 or higher


  • Triple jump, women's record is 15.50, there are 516 men's records 16.80 or longer








share|improve this answer










New contributor




Xen2050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 13 hours ago





















New contributor




Xen2050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered yesterday









Xen2050

24417




24417




New contributor




Xen2050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Xen2050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Xen2050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 20




    This shows that the top male athlete could beat the top female athlete. It doesn't match the claim - that even the 100th "best" male athlete could beat the top female athletes.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 5




    It is a particularly strange quote, claiming that out of the top 100 athletes in "almost any / most sports", that every man would beat every women... but the Olympic records are well verified and recorded and easily compared, probably the best "data" available, I don't know where to find the top 10 or top 100 Olympic results, but I would be skeptical if they were significantly different from the top records
    – Xen2050
    yesterday






  • 3




    @Xen2050 You're not comparing 100th to 100th. You're comparing 100th to 1st.
    – wizzwizz4
    yesterday






  • 3




    everything except the discus throw - and negligible advantages on shot putting and hammer throwing.... except that they use differently weighted objects per sex, so all the numbers for those are meaningless.
    – Mazura
    yesterday






  • 5




    @Mazura I think the fact that the throwing events usually have such a drastic weight difference actually speaks volumes.
    – Xen2050
    yesterday














  • 20




    This shows that the top male athlete could beat the top female athlete. It doesn't match the claim - that even the 100th "best" male athlete could beat the top female athletes.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 5




    It is a particularly strange quote, claiming that out of the top 100 athletes in "almost any / most sports", that every man would beat every women... but the Olympic records are well verified and recorded and easily compared, probably the best "data" available, I don't know where to find the top 10 or top 100 Olympic results, but I would be skeptical if they were significantly different from the top records
    – Xen2050
    yesterday






  • 3




    @Xen2050 You're not comparing 100th to 100th. You're comparing 100th to 1st.
    – wizzwizz4
    yesterday






  • 3




    everything except the discus throw - and negligible advantages on shot putting and hammer throwing.... except that they use differently weighted objects per sex, so all the numbers for those are meaningless.
    – Mazura
    yesterday






  • 5




    @Mazura I think the fact that the throwing events usually have such a drastic weight difference actually speaks volumes.
    – Xen2050
    yesterday








20




20




This shows that the top male athlete could beat the top female athlete. It doesn't match the claim - that even the 100th "best" male athlete could beat the top female athletes.
– Oddthinking
yesterday




This shows that the top male athlete could beat the top female athlete. It doesn't match the claim - that even the 100th "best" male athlete could beat the top female athletes.
– Oddthinking
yesterday




5




5




It is a particularly strange quote, claiming that out of the top 100 athletes in "almost any / most sports", that every man would beat every women... but the Olympic records are well verified and recorded and easily compared, probably the best "data" available, I don't know where to find the top 10 or top 100 Olympic results, but I would be skeptical if they were significantly different from the top records
– Xen2050
yesterday




It is a particularly strange quote, claiming that out of the top 100 athletes in "almost any / most sports", that every man would beat every women... but the Olympic records are well verified and recorded and easily compared, probably the best "data" available, I don't know where to find the top 10 or top 100 Olympic results, but I would be skeptical if they were significantly different from the top records
– Xen2050
yesterday




3




3




@Xen2050 You're not comparing 100th to 100th. You're comparing 100th to 1st.
– wizzwizz4
yesterday




@Xen2050 You're not comparing 100th to 100th. You're comparing 100th to 1st.
– wizzwizz4
yesterday




3




3




everything except the discus throw - and negligible advantages on shot putting and hammer throwing.... except that they use differently weighted objects per sex, so all the numbers for those are meaningless.
– Mazura
yesterday




everything except the discus throw - and negligible advantages on shot putting and hammer throwing.... except that they use differently weighted objects per sex, so all the numbers for those are meaningless.
– Mazura
yesterday




5




5




@Mazura I think the fact that the throwing events usually have such a drastic weight difference actually speaks volumes.
– Xen2050
yesterday




@Mazura I think the fact that the throwing events usually have such a drastic weight difference actually speaks volumes.
– Xen2050
yesterday











1














The question can not be honestly answered as it is stated remarkably imprecise ( in more than two instances ).



Success in "sport" disciplines depend on sportive qualities that are distinct from each other ranging from fast strategic thinking (chess) over teamwork (i.e. climbing, ice-stick shooting, curling and alike team sports) to athletic capabilities.



While many of these qualities are not tangled to sex, muscular strength, fast power and endurance performance are.

There are physiological differences in muscular composition between males and females in homo sapiens that are rooted in sex driven hormonal differences that beside direct impact interact in various ways with growth and motoric ability. Some of these sex differences might be overcome by hormonal substitution combined with training at least in young fit individuals (this is because the bone composition / tendonous apparatus needs to adapt to muscular strength and the timeframe for bone composition change is early in lifespan).



Therefore only in "sports" that depend foremost on power of the muscular skeletal system in a challenge of comparable conditioned man and women, the males are unlikely to be beaten even by exceptional strong females i.e. olympic weightlifting (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympic_weightlifting)



Some selective literature:



Sex-Based Differences in Skeletal Muscle Kinetics and Fiber-Type Composition
K. M. Haizlip, B. C. Harrison, L. A. Leinwand
Physiology (Bethesda) 2015 Jan; 30(1): 30–39. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00024.2014
PMCID: PMC4285578



The exercise sex gap and the impact of the estrous cycle on exercise performance in mice
Aderbal S. Aguiar, Jr, Ana Elisa Speck, Inês M. Amaral, Paula M. Canas, Rodrigo A. Cunha
Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 10742. Published online 2018 Jul 16. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29050-0
PMCID: PMC6048134



Sex-Related Differences in Muscle Composition and Motor Unit Firing Rates of the First Dorsal Interosseous: 114 Board; Wray, Mandy & Sterczala, Adam & Miller, Jonathan & L. Dimmick, Hannah & Herda, Trent. (2018) #3 May 30 9. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 50. 8. 10.1249/01.mss.0000535111.46582.39.



Sex-Related Differences in Gene Expression in Human Skeletal Muscle
Stephen Welle, Rabi Tawil, Charles A. Thornton
PLoS One. 2008; 3(1): e1385. Published online 2008 Jan 2. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001385






share|improve this answer



















  • 11




    -1: The quote is about sexual dimorphism in humans and how it compares to other animals. The first two (three?) articles are based on non-human animal models. So they don't support your answer. I agree that the claim is imprecise, but I don't think you've shown that.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday








  • 6




    -1 "Some of these sex differences might be overcome by hormonal substitution" So you're saying that to get over the differences of men and women, partially turn the women into men? You seem to be missing the point.
    – UKMonkey
    20 hours ago
















1














The question can not be honestly answered as it is stated remarkably imprecise ( in more than two instances ).



Success in "sport" disciplines depend on sportive qualities that are distinct from each other ranging from fast strategic thinking (chess) over teamwork (i.e. climbing, ice-stick shooting, curling and alike team sports) to athletic capabilities.



While many of these qualities are not tangled to sex, muscular strength, fast power and endurance performance are.

There are physiological differences in muscular composition between males and females in homo sapiens that are rooted in sex driven hormonal differences that beside direct impact interact in various ways with growth and motoric ability. Some of these sex differences might be overcome by hormonal substitution combined with training at least in young fit individuals (this is because the bone composition / tendonous apparatus needs to adapt to muscular strength and the timeframe for bone composition change is early in lifespan).



Therefore only in "sports" that depend foremost on power of the muscular skeletal system in a challenge of comparable conditioned man and women, the males are unlikely to be beaten even by exceptional strong females i.e. olympic weightlifting (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympic_weightlifting)



Some selective literature:



Sex-Based Differences in Skeletal Muscle Kinetics and Fiber-Type Composition
K. M. Haizlip, B. C. Harrison, L. A. Leinwand
Physiology (Bethesda) 2015 Jan; 30(1): 30–39. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00024.2014
PMCID: PMC4285578



The exercise sex gap and the impact of the estrous cycle on exercise performance in mice
Aderbal S. Aguiar, Jr, Ana Elisa Speck, Inês M. Amaral, Paula M. Canas, Rodrigo A. Cunha
Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 10742. Published online 2018 Jul 16. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29050-0
PMCID: PMC6048134



Sex-Related Differences in Muscle Composition and Motor Unit Firing Rates of the First Dorsal Interosseous: 114 Board; Wray, Mandy & Sterczala, Adam & Miller, Jonathan & L. Dimmick, Hannah & Herda, Trent. (2018) #3 May 30 9. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 50. 8. 10.1249/01.mss.0000535111.46582.39.



Sex-Related Differences in Gene Expression in Human Skeletal Muscle
Stephen Welle, Rabi Tawil, Charles A. Thornton
PLoS One. 2008; 3(1): e1385. Published online 2008 Jan 2. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001385






share|improve this answer



















  • 11




    -1: The quote is about sexual dimorphism in humans and how it compares to other animals. The first two (three?) articles are based on non-human animal models. So they don't support your answer. I agree that the claim is imprecise, but I don't think you've shown that.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday








  • 6




    -1 "Some of these sex differences might be overcome by hormonal substitution" So you're saying that to get over the differences of men and women, partially turn the women into men? You seem to be missing the point.
    – UKMonkey
    20 hours ago














1












1








1






The question can not be honestly answered as it is stated remarkably imprecise ( in more than two instances ).



Success in "sport" disciplines depend on sportive qualities that are distinct from each other ranging from fast strategic thinking (chess) over teamwork (i.e. climbing, ice-stick shooting, curling and alike team sports) to athletic capabilities.



While many of these qualities are not tangled to sex, muscular strength, fast power and endurance performance are.

There are physiological differences in muscular composition between males and females in homo sapiens that are rooted in sex driven hormonal differences that beside direct impact interact in various ways with growth and motoric ability. Some of these sex differences might be overcome by hormonal substitution combined with training at least in young fit individuals (this is because the bone composition / tendonous apparatus needs to adapt to muscular strength and the timeframe for bone composition change is early in lifespan).



Therefore only in "sports" that depend foremost on power of the muscular skeletal system in a challenge of comparable conditioned man and women, the males are unlikely to be beaten even by exceptional strong females i.e. olympic weightlifting (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympic_weightlifting)



Some selective literature:



Sex-Based Differences in Skeletal Muscle Kinetics and Fiber-Type Composition
K. M. Haizlip, B. C. Harrison, L. A. Leinwand
Physiology (Bethesda) 2015 Jan; 30(1): 30–39. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00024.2014
PMCID: PMC4285578



The exercise sex gap and the impact of the estrous cycle on exercise performance in mice
Aderbal S. Aguiar, Jr, Ana Elisa Speck, Inês M. Amaral, Paula M. Canas, Rodrigo A. Cunha
Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 10742. Published online 2018 Jul 16. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29050-0
PMCID: PMC6048134



Sex-Related Differences in Muscle Composition and Motor Unit Firing Rates of the First Dorsal Interosseous: 114 Board; Wray, Mandy & Sterczala, Adam & Miller, Jonathan & L. Dimmick, Hannah & Herda, Trent. (2018) #3 May 30 9. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 50. 8. 10.1249/01.mss.0000535111.46582.39.



Sex-Related Differences in Gene Expression in Human Skeletal Muscle
Stephen Welle, Rabi Tawil, Charles A. Thornton
PLoS One. 2008; 3(1): e1385. Published online 2008 Jan 2. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001385






share|improve this answer














The question can not be honestly answered as it is stated remarkably imprecise ( in more than two instances ).



Success in "sport" disciplines depend on sportive qualities that are distinct from each other ranging from fast strategic thinking (chess) over teamwork (i.e. climbing, ice-stick shooting, curling and alike team sports) to athletic capabilities.



While many of these qualities are not tangled to sex, muscular strength, fast power and endurance performance are.

There are physiological differences in muscular composition between males and females in homo sapiens that are rooted in sex driven hormonal differences that beside direct impact interact in various ways with growth and motoric ability. Some of these sex differences might be overcome by hormonal substitution combined with training at least in young fit individuals (this is because the bone composition / tendonous apparatus needs to adapt to muscular strength and the timeframe for bone composition change is early in lifespan).



Therefore only in "sports" that depend foremost on power of the muscular skeletal system in a challenge of comparable conditioned man and women, the males are unlikely to be beaten even by exceptional strong females i.e. olympic weightlifting (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympic_weightlifting)



Some selective literature:



Sex-Based Differences in Skeletal Muscle Kinetics and Fiber-Type Composition
K. M. Haizlip, B. C. Harrison, L. A. Leinwand
Physiology (Bethesda) 2015 Jan; 30(1): 30–39. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00024.2014
PMCID: PMC4285578



The exercise sex gap and the impact of the estrous cycle on exercise performance in mice
Aderbal S. Aguiar, Jr, Ana Elisa Speck, Inês M. Amaral, Paula M. Canas, Rodrigo A. Cunha
Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 10742. Published online 2018 Jul 16. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29050-0
PMCID: PMC6048134



Sex-Related Differences in Muscle Composition and Motor Unit Firing Rates of the First Dorsal Interosseous: 114 Board; Wray, Mandy & Sterczala, Adam & Miller, Jonathan & L. Dimmick, Hannah & Herda, Trent. (2018) #3 May 30 9. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 50. 8. 10.1249/01.mss.0000535111.46582.39.



Sex-Related Differences in Gene Expression in Human Skeletal Muscle
Stephen Welle, Rabi Tawil, Charles A. Thornton
PLoS One. 2008; 3(1): e1385. Published online 2008 Jan 2. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001385







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









ABri

23513




23513








  • 11




    -1: The quote is about sexual dimorphism in humans and how it compares to other animals. The first two (three?) articles are based on non-human animal models. So they don't support your answer. I agree that the claim is imprecise, but I don't think you've shown that.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday








  • 6




    -1 "Some of these sex differences might be overcome by hormonal substitution" So you're saying that to get over the differences of men and women, partially turn the women into men? You seem to be missing the point.
    – UKMonkey
    20 hours ago














  • 11




    -1: The quote is about sexual dimorphism in humans and how it compares to other animals. The first two (three?) articles are based on non-human animal models. So they don't support your answer. I agree that the claim is imprecise, but I don't think you've shown that.
    – Oddthinking
    yesterday








  • 6




    -1 "Some of these sex differences might be overcome by hormonal substitution" So you're saying that to get over the differences of men and women, partially turn the women into men? You seem to be missing the point.
    – UKMonkey
    20 hours ago








11




11




-1: The quote is about sexual dimorphism in humans and how it compares to other animals. The first two (three?) articles are based on non-human animal models. So they don't support your answer. I agree that the claim is imprecise, but I don't think you've shown that.
– Oddthinking
yesterday






-1: The quote is about sexual dimorphism in humans and how it compares to other animals. The first two (three?) articles are based on non-human animal models. So they don't support your answer. I agree that the claim is imprecise, but I don't think you've shown that.
– Oddthinking
yesterday






6




6




-1 "Some of these sex differences might be overcome by hormonal substitution" So you're saying that to get over the differences of men and women, partially turn the women into men? You seem to be missing the point.
– UKMonkey
20 hours ago




-1 "Some of these sex differences might be overcome by hormonal substitution" So you're saying that to get over the differences of men and women, partially turn the women into men? You seem to be missing the point.
– UKMonkey
20 hours ago





protected by Community 19 hours ago



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg