Solve $x^2 - frac{1}{ln(x) - 1} + frac{1}{x^2(ln(x)-1)} = 0$ [closed]












0












$begingroup$


How would I find the roots of this function?



begin{equation}
x^2 - frac{1}{ln(x) - 1} + frac{1}{x^2(ln(x)-1)} = 0
end{equation}



I don't really know how i would tackle this problem because we're working with natural logarithms. Does anyone have an idea?






logarithms roots







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by RRL, Cesareo, José Carlos Santos, mrtaurho, Leucippus Jan 20 at 1:47


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – RRL, Cesareo, José Carlos Santos, mrtaurho, Leucippus

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.





















    0












    $begingroup$


    How would I find the roots of this function?



    begin{equation}
    x^2 - frac{1}{ln(x) - 1} + frac{1}{x^2(ln(x)-1)} = 0
    end{equation}



    I don't really know how i would tackle this problem because we're working with natural logarithms. Does anyone have an idea?






    logarithms roots







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$



    closed as off-topic by RRL, Cesareo, José Carlos Santos, mrtaurho, Leucippus Jan 20 at 1:47


    This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


    • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – RRL, Cesareo, José Carlos Santos, mrtaurho, Leucippus

    If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.



















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      How would I find the roots of this function?



      begin{equation}
      x^2 - frac{1}{ln(x) - 1} + frac{1}{x^2(ln(x)-1)} = 0
      end{equation}



      I don't really know how i would tackle this problem because we're working with natural logarithms. Does anyone have an idea?






      logarithms roots







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      How would I find the roots of this function?



      begin{equation}
      x^2 - frac{1}{ln(x) - 1} + frac{1}{x^2(ln(x)-1)} = 0
      end{equation}



      I don't really know how i would tackle this problem because we're working with natural logarithms. Does anyone have an idea?






      logarithms roots




      logarithms roots






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 18 at 17:08









      ViktorViktor

      16310




      16310




      closed as off-topic by RRL, Cesareo, José Carlos Santos, mrtaurho, Leucippus Jan 20 at 1:47


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – RRL, Cesareo, José Carlos Santos, mrtaurho, Leucippus

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







      closed as off-topic by RRL, Cesareo, José Carlos Santos, mrtaurho, Leucippus Jan 20 at 1:47


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – RRL, Cesareo, José Carlos Santos, mrtaurho, Leucippus

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          If you plot the fuction, you see solutions around $x=1$ and $x=3$ from which you can start Newton method.



          You can have approximations using series expansions.



          Around $x=0$,
          $$x^2 - frac{1}{ln(x) - 1} + frac{1}{x^2(ln(x)-1)} = 1+4 (x-1)+Oleft((x-1)^3right)$$ and then the solution is close to
          $$x=frac{3}4$$



          Around $x=3$, the expansion would be
          $$left(9-frac{8}{9 (log (3)-1)}right)+frac{2 (x-3) left(86+81 log ^2(3)-163
          log (3)right)}{27 (log (3)-1)^2}+Oleft((x-3)^2right)$$           and the the solution is close to
          $$x=frac{3 left(83+81 log ^2(3)-156 log (3)right)}{2 left(86+81 log ^2(3)-163
          log (3)right)}approx 3.00039$$



          Edit



          With regard to the first root, you could have better and better rational approximations building the $[1,n]$ Padé approximant. This would give
          $$left(
          begin{array}{ccc}
          n & x_{(n)} & x_{(n)} approx \
          1 & frac{3}{4} & 0.750000 \
          2 & frac{25}{33} & 0.757576 \
          3 & frac{1247}{1643} & 0.758977 \
          4 & frac{5179}{6822} & 0.759162 \
          5 & frac{11947}{15737} & 0.759166 \
          6 & frac{1339361}{1764260} & 0.759163
          end{array}
          right)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            Hint: By a numeric method we find $$xapprox 0.75916167335311382164$$ or $$xapprox 3.00039175573599420937$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I've used WolframAlpha which also gave this sollution, but i was wondering if there was an analytic solution for this because solving this equation was necessary to solve a part of a question on my exam.
              $endgroup$
              – Viktor
              Jan 18 at 17:16






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Either the person who made the exam made a mistake, or solving the equation explicitly was not required.
              $endgroup$
              – Robert Israel
              Jan 18 at 17:23












            • $begingroup$
              I've asked the full question in a new thread you can find here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3078569/… the question is about differential equations.
              $endgroup$
              – Viktor
              Jan 18 at 17:56





















            0












            $begingroup$

            I usually do a quick plot like Plot[x^2-1/(Log[x]-1)+1/(x^2(Log[x]-1)),{x,-10,+10}] which shows the above roots quickly and that there are no others.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              If you plot the fuction, you see solutions around $x=1$ and $x=3$ from which you can start Newton method.



              You can have approximations using series expansions.



              Around $x=0$,
              $$x^2 - frac{1}{ln(x) - 1} + frac{1}{x^2(ln(x)-1)} = 1+4 (x-1)+Oleft((x-1)^3right)$$ and then the solution is close to
              $$x=frac{3}4$$



              Around $x=3$, the expansion would be
              $$left(9-frac{8}{9 (log (3)-1)}right)+frac{2 (x-3) left(86+81 log ^2(3)-163
              log (3)right)}{27 (log (3)-1)^2}+Oleft((x-3)^2right)$$               and the the solution is close to
              $$x=frac{3 left(83+81 log ^2(3)-156 log (3)right)}{2 left(86+81 log ^2(3)-163
              log (3)right)}approx 3.00039$$



              Edit



              With regard to the first root, you could have better and better rational approximations building the $[1,n]$ Padé approximant. This would give
              $$left(
              begin{array}{ccc}
              n & x_{(n)} & x_{(n)} approx \
              1 & frac{3}{4} & 0.750000 \
              2 & frac{25}{33} & 0.757576 \
              3 & frac{1247}{1643} & 0.758977 \
              4 & frac{5179}{6822} & 0.759162 \
              5 & frac{11947}{15737} & 0.759166 \
              6 & frac{1339361}{1764260} & 0.759163
              end{array}
              right)$$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                If you plot the fuction, you see solutions around $x=1$ and $x=3$ from which you can start Newton method.



                You can have approximations using series expansions.



                Around $x=0$,
                $$x^2 - frac{1}{ln(x) - 1} + frac{1}{x^2(ln(x)-1)} = 1+4 (x-1)+Oleft((x-1)^3right)$$ and then the solution is close to
                $$x=frac{3}4$$



                Around $x=3$, the expansion would be
                $$left(9-frac{8}{9 (log (3)-1)}right)+frac{2 (x-3) left(86+81 log ^2(3)-163
                log (3)right)}{27 (log (3)-1)^2}+Oleft((x-3)^2right)$$                 and the the solution is close to
                $$x=frac{3 left(83+81 log ^2(3)-156 log (3)right)}{2 left(86+81 log ^2(3)-163
                log (3)right)}approx 3.00039$$



                Edit



                With regard to the first root, you could have better and better rational approximations building the $[1,n]$ Padé approximant. This would give
                $$left(
                begin{array}{ccc}
                n & x_{(n)} & x_{(n)} approx \
                1 & frac{3}{4} & 0.750000 \
                2 & frac{25}{33} & 0.757576 \
                3 & frac{1247}{1643} & 0.758977 \
                4 & frac{5179}{6822} & 0.759162 \
                5 & frac{11947}{15737} & 0.759166 \
                6 & frac{1339361}{1764260} & 0.759163
                end{array}
                right)$$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  If you plot the fuction, you see solutions around $x=1$ and $x=3$ from which you can start Newton method.



                  You can have approximations using series expansions.



                  Around $x=0$,
                  $$x^2 - frac{1}{ln(x) - 1} + frac{1}{x^2(ln(x)-1)} = 1+4 (x-1)+Oleft((x-1)^3right)$$ and then the solution is close to
                  $$x=frac{3}4$$



                  Around $x=3$, the expansion would be
                  $$left(9-frac{8}{9 (log (3)-1)}right)+frac{2 (x-3) left(86+81 log ^2(3)-163
                  log (3)right)}{27 (log (3)-1)^2}+Oleft((x-3)^2right)$$                   and the the solution is close to
                  $$x=frac{3 left(83+81 log ^2(3)-156 log (3)right)}{2 left(86+81 log ^2(3)-163
                  log (3)right)}approx 3.00039$$



                  Edit



                  With regard to the first root, you could have better and better rational approximations building the $[1,n]$ Padé approximant. This would give
                  $$left(
                  begin{array}{ccc}
                  n & x_{(n)} & x_{(n)} approx \
                  1 & frac{3}{4} & 0.750000 \
                  2 & frac{25}{33} & 0.757576 \
                  3 & frac{1247}{1643} & 0.758977 \
                  4 & frac{5179}{6822} & 0.759162 \
                  5 & frac{11947}{15737} & 0.759166 \
                  6 & frac{1339361}{1764260} & 0.759163
                  end{array}
                  right)$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  If you plot the fuction, you see solutions around $x=1$ and $x=3$ from which you can start Newton method.



                  You can have approximations using series expansions.



                  Around $x=0$,
                  $$x^2 - frac{1}{ln(x) - 1} + frac{1}{x^2(ln(x)-1)} = 1+4 (x-1)+Oleft((x-1)^3right)$$ and then the solution is close to
                  $$x=frac{3}4$$



                  Around $x=3$, the expansion would be
                  $$left(9-frac{8}{9 (log (3)-1)}right)+frac{2 (x-3) left(86+81 log ^2(3)-163
                  log (3)right)}{27 (log (3)-1)^2}+Oleft((x-3)^2right)$$                   and the the solution is close to
                  $$x=frac{3 left(83+81 log ^2(3)-156 log (3)right)}{2 left(86+81 log ^2(3)-163
                  log (3)right)}approx 3.00039$$



                  Edit



                  With regard to the first root, you could have better and better rational approximations building the $[1,n]$ Padé approximant. This would give
                  $$left(
                  begin{array}{ccc}
                  n & x_{(n)} & x_{(n)} approx \
                  1 & frac{3}{4} & 0.750000 \
                  2 & frac{25}{33} & 0.757576 \
                  3 & frac{1247}{1643} & 0.758977 \
                  4 & frac{5179}{6822} & 0.759162 \
                  5 & frac{11947}{15737} & 0.759166 \
                  6 & frac{1339361}{1764260} & 0.759163
                  end{array}
                  right)$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 19 at 8:40

























                  answered Jan 19 at 7:21









                  Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici

                  126k1158135




                  126k1158135























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      Hint: By a numeric method we find $$xapprox 0.75916167335311382164$$ or $$xapprox 3.00039175573599420937$$






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$









                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        I've used WolframAlpha which also gave this sollution, but i was wondering if there was an analytic solution for this because solving this equation was necessary to solve a part of a question on my exam.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Viktor
                        Jan 18 at 17:16






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Either the person who made the exam made a mistake, or solving the equation explicitly was not required.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Robert Israel
                        Jan 18 at 17:23












                      • $begingroup$
                        I've asked the full question in a new thread you can find here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3078569/… the question is about differential equations.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Viktor
                        Jan 18 at 17:56


















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      Hint: By a numeric method we find $$xapprox 0.75916167335311382164$$ or $$xapprox 3.00039175573599420937$$






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$









                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        I've used WolframAlpha which also gave this sollution, but i was wondering if there was an analytic solution for this because solving this equation was necessary to solve a part of a question on my exam.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Viktor
                        Jan 18 at 17:16






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Either the person who made the exam made a mistake, or solving the equation explicitly was not required.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Robert Israel
                        Jan 18 at 17:23












                      • $begingroup$
                        I've asked the full question in a new thread you can find here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3078569/… the question is about differential equations.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Viktor
                        Jan 18 at 17:56
















                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      Hint: By a numeric method we find $$xapprox 0.75916167335311382164$$ or $$xapprox 3.00039175573599420937$$






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      Hint: By a numeric method we find $$xapprox 0.75916167335311382164$$ or $$xapprox 3.00039175573599420937$$







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Jan 18 at 17:13









                      Dr. Sonnhard GraubnerDr. Sonnhard Graubner

                      79.2k42867




                      79.2k42867








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        I've used WolframAlpha which also gave this sollution, but i was wondering if there was an analytic solution for this because solving this equation was necessary to solve a part of a question on my exam.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Viktor
                        Jan 18 at 17:16






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Either the person who made the exam made a mistake, or solving the equation explicitly was not required.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Robert Israel
                        Jan 18 at 17:23












                      • $begingroup$
                        I've asked the full question in a new thread you can find here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3078569/… the question is about differential equations.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Viktor
                        Jan 18 at 17:56
















                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        I've used WolframAlpha which also gave this sollution, but i was wondering if there was an analytic solution for this because solving this equation was necessary to solve a part of a question on my exam.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Viktor
                        Jan 18 at 17:16






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Either the person who made the exam made a mistake, or solving the equation explicitly was not required.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Robert Israel
                        Jan 18 at 17:23












                      • $begingroup$
                        I've asked the full question in a new thread you can find here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3078569/… the question is about differential equations.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Viktor
                        Jan 18 at 17:56










                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      I've used WolframAlpha which also gave this sollution, but i was wondering if there was an analytic solution for this because solving this equation was necessary to solve a part of a question on my exam.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Viktor
                      Jan 18 at 17:16




                      $begingroup$
                      I've used WolframAlpha which also gave this sollution, but i was wondering if there was an analytic solution for this because solving this equation was necessary to solve a part of a question on my exam.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Viktor
                      Jan 18 at 17:16




                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      Either the person who made the exam made a mistake, or solving the equation explicitly was not required.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Robert Israel
                      Jan 18 at 17:23






                      $begingroup$
                      Either the person who made the exam made a mistake, or solving the equation explicitly was not required.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Robert Israel
                      Jan 18 at 17:23














                      $begingroup$
                      I've asked the full question in a new thread you can find here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3078569/… the question is about differential equations.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Viktor
                      Jan 18 at 17:56






                      $begingroup$
                      I've asked the full question in a new thread you can find here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3078569/… the question is about differential equations.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Viktor
                      Jan 18 at 17:56













                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      I usually do a quick plot like Plot[x^2-1/(Log[x]-1)+1/(x^2(Log[x]-1)),{x,-10,+10}] which shows the above roots quickly and that there are no others.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        I usually do a quick plot like Plot[x^2-1/(Log[x]-1)+1/(x^2(Log[x]-1)),{x,-10,+10}] which shows the above roots quickly and that there are no others.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          I usually do a quick plot like Plot[x^2-1/(Log[x]-1)+1/(x^2(Log[x]-1)),{x,-10,+10}] which shows the above roots quickly and that there are no others.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          I usually do a quick plot like Plot[x^2-1/(Log[x]-1)+1/(x^2(Log[x]-1)),{x,-10,+10}] which shows the above roots quickly and that there are no others.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 18 at 19:28









                          Lorenz H MenkeLorenz H Menke

                          9611




                          9611















                              -

                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Human spaceflight

                              Image
                              Human spaceflight From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search "Space traveler" redirects here. For other uses, see Space traveler (disambiguation). @media all and (max-width:720px){.mw-parser-output .tmulti>.thumbinner{width:100%!important;max-width:none!important}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .tsingle{float:none!important;max-width:none!important;width:100%!important;text-align:center}} Apollo 11 crewmember Buzz Aldrin on the Moon, 1969 International Space Station crewmember Tracy Caldwell Dyson views the Earth, 2010 Space Shuttle Discovery heads into space with a crew aboard, STS-121 in 2006 Inside a space suit on the Canadarm, 1993 Human spaceflight (also referred to as crewed spaceflight or manned spaceflight ) is space travel with a crew or passengers aboard the spacecraft. Spacecraft carrying people may be operated directly, by human crew, or it may be e...
                              Read more

                              Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                              Image
                              0 1 What exactly does the error message beginning with E: mean? I assume it has to do with the file structure on Ubuntu-on-Windows, but what exactly? The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required: os-prober Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove it. The following extra packages will be installed: libxslt1.1 The following NEW packages will be installed: libxslt1.1 xmlstarlet 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 435 kB of archives. After this operation, 1023 kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main libxslt1.1 amd64 1.1.28-2build1 [145 kB] Get:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/universe xmlstarlet amd64 1.5.0-1 [290 kB] ...
                              Read more

                              張江高科駅

                              Image
                              張江高科駅 ちょうこうこうか Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park 所在地 中国上海市浦東新区 所属事業者 上海地鉄運営有限公司（上海軌道交通・駅詳細） 上海浦東現代有軌交通有限公司（駅詳細） テンプレートを表示 張江高科駅 各種表記 繁体字： 張江高科站 簡体字： 张江高科站 拼音 ： Zhàngjiāng Gāokē Zhàn 発音： ヂャンジャン ガオクー ヂャン 英文： Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Station テンプレートを表示 張江高科駅 （ちょうこうこうか-えき）は中華人民共和国上海市浦東新区に位置する、上海軌道交通2号線の駅である。 なお、張江高科駅前にある張江軌道電車の 張江地鉄駅駅 についてもここで述べる。 目次 1 利用可能な鉄道路線 2 沿革 3 駅構造 3.1 上海軌道交通 3.2 張江軌道電車 4 駅周辺 5 隣の駅 6 注釈 7 関連項目 利用可能な鉄道路線 上海軌道交通 ■ 2号線 上海浦東現代有軌交通有限公司 ■ 張江軌道電車 沿革 高架駅時代の姿 2000年12月27日 - 2号線の駅が高架駅として開業。 2010年 1月1日 - 張江軌道電車の開業に伴い、張江地鉄駅駅（停留所）を設置。 2月13日 - 駅地下化に伴い高架駅の運用停止。 2月24日 - 10日間の閉鎖を経て地下新駅の開業。 2017年2月9日 - リニューアル工事を経て再開業。乗降客の増加に対応し、ホームへのエレベーター、エスカレーターを増設、券売機エリアを拡張した [1] 。 駅構造 上海軌道交通 上海軌道交通 張江高科駅 5号口 ちょうこうこうか Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park ◄ 竜陽路 (2.60km) (1.61km) 金科路 ► 所在地 中国上海市浦東新区松涛路 祖冲之路 （中国語版） 北緯31度12分11秒 東経121度34分50秒  /  北緯31.2...
                              Read more