Completion of a $sigma$-algebra is a $sigma$-algebra
$begingroup$
Let $(Omega,mathcal{F},mathbb{P})$ be a probability space. Let
begin{align*}
mathcal{N}&= left{NsubseteqOmega:exists Finmathcal{F}, Nsubseteq F,mathbb{P}(F)=0right} \ mathcal{G}&=left{Acup N:Ainmathcal{F},Ninmathcal{N}right} end{align*}
Prove that $mathcal{G}$ is a $sigma$-algebra.
I've shown that $Omegainmathcal{G}$ and that if $(A_n)_nsubseteqmathcal{G}$ then $cup_n A_ninmathcal{G}$. How can I show that if $Ainmathcal{G}$ then $A^cinmathcal{G}$?
I also noticed $mathcal{F}subseteqmathcal{G}$ if it helps somehow.
probability-theory measure-theory elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(Omega,mathcal{F},mathbb{P})$ be a probability space. Let
begin{align*}
mathcal{N}&= left{NsubseteqOmega:exists Finmathcal{F}, Nsubseteq F,mathbb{P}(F)=0right} \ mathcal{G}&=left{Acup N:Ainmathcal{F},Ninmathcal{N}right} end{align*}
Prove that $mathcal{G}$ is a $sigma$-algebra.
I've shown that $Omegainmathcal{G}$ and that if $(A_n)_nsubseteqmathcal{G}$ then $cup_n A_ninmathcal{G}$. How can I show that if $Ainmathcal{G}$ then $A^cinmathcal{G}$?
I also noticed $mathcal{F}subseteqmathcal{G}$ if it helps somehow.
probability-theory measure-theory elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(Omega,mathcal{F},mathbb{P})$ be a probability space. Let
begin{align*}
mathcal{N}&= left{NsubseteqOmega:exists Finmathcal{F}, Nsubseteq F,mathbb{P}(F)=0right} \ mathcal{G}&=left{Acup N:Ainmathcal{F},Ninmathcal{N}right} end{align*}
Prove that $mathcal{G}$ is a $sigma$-algebra.
I've shown that $Omegainmathcal{G}$ and that if $(A_n)_nsubseteqmathcal{G}$ then $cup_n A_ninmathcal{G}$. How can I show that if $Ainmathcal{G}$ then $A^cinmathcal{G}$?
I also noticed $mathcal{F}subseteqmathcal{G}$ if it helps somehow.
probability-theory measure-theory elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
Let $(Omega,mathcal{F},mathbb{P})$ be a probability space. Let
begin{align*}
mathcal{N}&= left{NsubseteqOmega:exists Finmathcal{F}, Nsubseteq F,mathbb{P}(F)=0right} \ mathcal{G}&=left{Acup N:Ainmathcal{F},Ninmathcal{N}right} end{align*}
Prove that $mathcal{G}$ is a $sigma$-algebra.
I've shown that $Omegainmathcal{G}$ and that if $(A_n)_nsubseteqmathcal{G}$ then $cup_n A_ninmathcal{G}$. How can I show that if $Ainmathcal{G}$ then $A^cinmathcal{G}$?
I also noticed $mathcal{F}subseteqmathcal{G}$ if it helps somehow.
probability-theory measure-theory elementary-set-theory
probability-theory measure-theory elementary-set-theory
edited Jan 22 at 12:35
Davide Giraudo
128k17156268
128k17156268
asked Jan 18 at 17:42
J. DoeJ. Doe
16613
16613
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $G=A cup N$ for $A in mathcal{F}$ and $N in mathcal{N}$. By definition, there exists $F in mathcal{F}$ such that $N subseteq F$ and $mathbb{P}(F)=0$. Clearly,
$$G^c = A^c cap N^c = underbrace{A^c}_W backslash underbrace{(N cap A^c)}_{U}$$
As $$underbrace{N cap A^c}_{U} subseteq underbrace{F cap A^c}_{V} subseteq underbrace{A^c}_{W}$$ it follows that
$$G^c = underbrace{big(A^c backslash (F cap A^c)big)}_{W backslash V} cup underbrace{big( (F cap A^c) backslash (N cap A^c) big)}_{V backslash U}; tag{1}$$
here we have used the general fact that
$$U subseteq V subseteq W implies W backslash U = (W backslash V) cup (V backslash U).$$ Consequently, we have shown that
$$G^c = tilde{A} cup tilde{N} tag{2}$$
for
$$tilde{A} := A^c backslash (F cap A^c)quad text{and} quad tilde{N}:= (F cap A^c) backslash (N cap A^c).$$
As $tilde{N} subseteq F in mathcal{F}$ and $mathbb{P}(F)=0$, we have $tilde{N} in mathcal{N}$. Morover, $A in mathcal{F}$ and $F in mathcal{F}$ implies $tilde{A} in mathcal{F}$. Consequently, $(2)$ shows that $G^c in mathcal{G}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why is $(1)$ true? @saz
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 22 at 10:26
1
$begingroup$
@J.Doe It follows from the "general fact" which I stated directly afterwards.I've just rewritten it a bit... perhaps it's clearer now.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 23 at 7:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be an event in $mathcal G$, so we can write it in the form $G=Acup N$ with $Ainmathcal F$, $Ninmathcal N$, so $Nsubseteq F$, for some suitable $Fin mathcal F$, $Bbb P(F)=0$.
Then
$$
begin{aligned}
A &subseteq {color{red}{G}}=Acup Nsubseteq Acup Ftext{ leads to}\
A^c &supseteq {color{red}{G^c}}=A^ccap N^csupseteq A^ccap F^c ,
end{aligned}
$$
so $G^c$ lies between two events in $mathcal G$ that differ by a null set,
$$
0le
Bbb P(A^c-(A^ccap F^c))
=
Bbb P(A^ccap F^{cc})
=
Bbb P(A^ccap F)
le
Bbb P(F)
=0
.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I got that $A^ccap F^csubseteq G^csubseteq A^c$, but how does $mathbb{P}(A^ccap F)=0$ leads us to $G^cinmathcal{G}$? @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 18 at 18:07
1
$begingroup$
$G^c$ is then between $A_1:=A^ccap F^c$ and $A_1cup N_1$ for that $N_1$ that makes $A_1cup N_1=A^c$.
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 18 at 18:11
$begingroup$
Sorry for stubborning but I still don't get it. We have $A_1=A^ccap F^csubseteq G^csubseteq A^c=A_1cup N_1$, but what does $G^c$ equal to for getting into the set $mathcal{G}$? @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 18 at 18:23
$begingroup$
$G^c=A_1cupcolor{red}{(G^c-A_1)}$ and the red entry is a subset of $N_1$. Thanks for asking, please always ask, do not even hesitate to do it. It is then my fault of not finding the argument that hits the point...
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 18 at 18:27
$begingroup$
We need that $G^c-A_1=(A^ccap N^c)-(A^ccap F^c)inmathcal{N}$. Why is that true? I observe that $G^c-A_1subseteq A^ccap N^c$ but not sure if it helps. @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 19 at 9:59
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078556%2fcompletion-of-a-sigma-algebra-is-a-sigma-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $G=A cup N$ for $A in mathcal{F}$ and $N in mathcal{N}$. By definition, there exists $F in mathcal{F}$ such that $N subseteq F$ and $mathbb{P}(F)=0$. Clearly,
$$G^c = A^c cap N^c = underbrace{A^c}_W backslash underbrace{(N cap A^c)}_{U}$$
As $$underbrace{N cap A^c}_{U} subseteq underbrace{F cap A^c}_{V} subseteq underbrace{A^c}_{W}$$ it follows that
$$G^c = underbrace{big(A^c backslash (F cap A^c)big)}_{W backslash V} cup underbrace{big( (F cap A^c) backslash (N cap A^c) big)}_{V backslash U}; tag{1}$$
here we have used the general fact that
$$U subseteq V subseteq W implies W backslash U = (W backslash V) cup (V backslash U).$$ Consequently, we have shown that
$$G^c = tilde{A} cup tilde{N} tag{2}$$
for
$$tilde{A} := A^c backslash (F cap A^c)quad text{and} quad tilde{N}:= (F cap A^c) backslash (N cap A^c).$$
As $tilde{N} subseteq F in mathcal{F}$ and $mathbb{P}(F)=0$, we have $tilde{N} in mathcal{N}$. Morover, $A in mathcal{F}$ and $F in mathcal{F}$ implies $tilde{A} in mathcal{F}$. Consequently, $(2)$ shows that $G^c in mathcal{G}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why is $(1)$ true? @saz
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 22 at 10:26
1
$begingroup$
@J.Doe It follows from the "general fact" which I stated directly afterwards.I've just rewritten it a bit... perhaps it's clearer now.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 23 at 7:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G=A cup N$ for $A in mathcal{F}$ and $N in mathcal{N}$. By definition, there exists $F in mathcal{F}$ such that $N subseteq F$ and $mathbb{P}(F)=0$. Clearly,
$$G^c = A^c cap N^c = underbrace{A^c}_W backslash underbrace{(N cap A^c)}_{U}$$
As $$underbrace{N cap A^c}_{U} subseteq underbrace{F cap A^c}_{V} subseteq underbrace{A^c}_{W}$$ it follows that
$$G^c = underbrace{big(A^c backslash (F cap A^c)big)}_{W backslash V} cup underbrace{big( (F cap A^c) backslash (N cap A^c) big)}_{V backslash U}; tag{1}$$
here we have used the general fact that
$$U subseteq V subseteq W implies W backslash U = (W backslash V) cup (V backslash U).$$ Consequently, we have shown that
$$G^c = tilde{A} cup tilde{N} tag{2}$$
for
$$tilde{A} := A^c backslash (F cap A^c)quad text{and} quad tilde{N}:= (F cap A^c) backslash (N cap A^c).$$
As $tilde{N} subseteq F in mathcal{F}$ and $mathbb{P}(F)=0$, we have $tilde{N} in mathcal{N}$. Morover, $A in mathcal{F}$ and $F in mathcal{F}$ implies $tilde{A} in mathcal{F}$. Consequently, $(2)$ shows that $G^c in mathcal{G}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why is $(1)$ true? @saz
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 22 at 10:26
1
$begingroup$
@J.Doe It follows from the "general fact" which I stated directly afterwards.I've just rewritten it a bit... perhaps it's clearer now.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 23 at 7:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G=A cup N$ for $A in mathcal{F}$ and $N in mathcal{N}$. By definition, there exists $F in mathcal{F}$ such that $N subseteq F$ and $mathbb{P}(F)=0$. Clearly,
$$G^c = A^c cap N^c = underbrace{A^c}_W backslash underbrace{(N cap A^c)}_{U}$$
As $$underbrace{N cap A^c}_{U} subseteq underbrace{F cap A^c}_{V} subseteq underbrace{A^c}_{W}$$ it follows that
$$G^c = underbrace{big(A^c backslash (F cap A^c)big)}_{W backslash V} cup underbrace{big( (F cap A^c) backslash (N cap A^c) big)}_{V backslash U}; tag{1}$$
here we have used the general fact that
$$U subseteq V subseteq W implies W backslash U = (W backslash V) cup (V backslash U).$$ Consequently, we have shown that
$$G^c = tilde{A} cup tilde{N} tag{2}$$
for
$$tilde{A} := A^c backslash (F cap A^c)quad text{and} quad tilde{N}:= (F cap A^c) backslash (N cap A^c).$$
As $tilde{N} subseteq F in mathcal{F}$ and $mathbb{P}(F)=0$, we have $tilde{N} in mathcal{N}$. Morover, $A in mathcal{F}$ and $F in mathcal{F}$ implies $tilde{A} in mathcal{F}$. Consequently, $(2)$ shows that $G^c in mathcal{G}$.
$endgroup$
Let $G=A cup N$ for $A in mathcal{F}$ and $N in mathcal{N}$. By definition, there exists $F in mathcal{F}$ such that $N subseteq F$ and $mathbb{P}(F)=0$. Clearly,
$$G^c = A^c cap N^c = underbrace{A^c}_W backslash underbrace{(N cap A^c)}_{U}$$
As $$underbrace{N cap A^c}_{U} subseteq underbrace{F cap A^c}_{V} subseteq underbrace{A^c}_{W}$$ it follows that
$$G^c = underbrace{big(A^c backslash (F cap A^c)big)}_{W backslash V} cup underbrace{big( (F cap A^c) backslash (N cap A^c) big)}_{V backslash U}; tag{1}$$
here we have used the general fact that
$$U subseteq V subseteq W implies W backslash U = (W backslash V) cup (V backslash U).$$ Consequently, we have shown that
$$G^c = tilde{A} cup tilde{N} tag{2}$$
for
$$tilde{A} := A^c backslash (F cap A^c)quad text{and} quad tilde{N}:= (F cap A^c) backslash (N cap A^c).$$
As $tilde{N} subseteq F in mathcal{F}$ and $mathbb{P}(F)=0$, we have $tilde{N} in mathcal{N}$. Morover, $A in mathcal{F}$ and $F in mathcal{F}$ implies $tilde{A} in mathcal{F}$. Consequently, $(2)$ shows that $G^c in mathcal{G}$.
edited Jan 23 at 7:53
answered Jan 21 at 18:51
sazsaz
82.7k863132
82.7k863132
$begingroup$
Why is $(1)$ true? @saz
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 22 at 10:26
1
$begingroup$
@J.Doe It follows from the "general fact" which I stated directly afterwards.I've just rewritten it a bit... perhaps it's clearer now.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 23 at 7:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why is $(1)$ true? @saz
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 22 at 10:26
1
$begingroup$
@J.Doe It follows from the "general fact" which I stated directly afterwards.I've just rewritten it a bit... perhaps it's clearer now.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 23 at 7:10
$begingroup$
Why is $(1)$ true? @saz
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 22 at 10:26
$begingroup$
Why is $(1)$ true? @saz
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 22 at 10:26
1
1
$begingroup$
@J.Doe It follows from the "general fact" which I stated directly afterwards.I've just rewritten it a bit... perhaps it's clearer now.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 23 at 7:10
$begingroup$
@J.Doe It follows from the "general fact" which I stated directly afterwards.I've just rewritten it a bit... perhaps it's clearer now.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 23 at 7:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be an event in $mathcal G$, so we can write it in the form $G=Acup N$ with $Ainmathcal F$, $Ninmathcal N$, so $Nsubseteq F$, for some suitable $Fin mathcal F$, $Bbb P(F)=0$.
Then
$$
begin{aligned}
A &subseteq {color{red}{G}}=Acup Nsubseteq Acup Ftext{ leads to}\
A^c &supseteq {color{red}{G^c}}=A^ccap N^csupseteq A^ccap F^c ,
end{aligned}
$$
so $G^c$ lies between two events in $mathcal G$ that differ by a null set,
$$
0le
Bbb P(A^c-(A^ccap F^c))
=
Bbb P(A^ccap F^{cc})
=
Bbb P(A^ccap F)
le
Bbb P(F)
=0
.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I got that $A^ccap F^csubseteq G^csubseteq A^c$, but how does $mathbb{P}(A^ccap F)=0$ leads us to $G^cinmathcal{G}$? @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 18 at 18:07
1
$begingroup$
$G^c$ is then between $A_1:=A^ccap F^c$ and $A_1cup N_1$ for that $N_1$ that makes $A_1cup N_1=A^c$.
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 18 at 18:11
$begingroup$
Sorry for stubborning but I still don't get it. We have $A_1=A^ccap F^csubseteq G^csubseteq A^c=A_1cup N_1$, but what does $G^c$ equal to for getting into the set $mathcal{G}$? @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 18 at 18:23
$begingroup$
$G^c=A_1cupcolor{red}{(G^c-A_1)}$ and the red entry is a subset of $N_1$. Thanks for asking, please always ask, do not even hesitate to do it. It is then my fault of not finding the argument that hits the point...
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 18 at 18:27
$begingroup$
We need that $G^c-A_1=(A^ccap N^c)-(A^ccap F^c)inmathcal{N}$. Why is that true? I observe that $G^c-A_1subseteq A^ccap N^c$ but not sure if it helps. @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 19 at 9:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be an event in $mathcal G$, so we can write it in the form $G=Acup N$ with $Ainmathcal F$, $Ninmathcal N$, so $Nsubseteq F$, for some suitable $Fin mathcal F$, $Bbb P(F)=0$.
Then
$$
begin{aligned}
A &subseteq {color{red}{G}}=Acup Nsubseteq Acup Ftext{ leads to}\
A^c &supseteq {color{red}{G^c}}=A^ccap N^csupseteq A^ccap F^c ,
end{aligned}
$$
so $G^c$ lies between two events in $mathcal G$ that differ by a null set,
$$
0le
Bbb P(A^c-(A^ccap F^c))
=
Bbb P(A^ccap F^{cc})
=
Bbb P(A^ccap F)
le
Bbb P(F)
=0
.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I got that $A^ccap F^csubseteq G^csubseteq A^c$, but how does $mathbb{P}(A^ccap F)=0$ leads us to $G^cinmathcal{G}$? @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 18 at 18:07
1
$begingroup$
$G^c$ is then between $A_1:=A^ccap F^c$ and $A_1cup N_1$ for that $N_1$ that makes $A_1cup N_1=A^c$.
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 18 at 18:11
$begingroup$
Sorry for stubborning but I still don't get it. We have $A_1=A^ccap F^csubseteq G^csubseteq A^c=A_1cup N_1$, but what does $G^c$ equal to for getting into the set $mathcal{G}$? @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 18 at 18:23
$begingroup$
$G^c=A_1cupcolor{red}{(G^c-A_1)}$ and the red entry is a subset of $N_1$. Thanks for asking, please always ask, do not even hesitate to do it. It is then my fault of not finding the argument that hits the point...
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 18 at 18:27
$begingroup$
We need that $G^c-A_1=(A^ccap N^c)-(A^ccap F^c)inmathcal{N}$. Why is that true? I observe that $G^c-A_1subseteq A^ccap N^c$ but not sure if it helps. @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 19 at 9:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be an event in $mathcal G$, so we can write it in the form $G=Acup N$ with $Ainmathcal F$, $Ninmathcal N$, so $Nsubseteq F$, for some suitable $Fin mathcal F$, $Bbb P(F)=0$.
Then
$$
begin{aligned}
A &subseteq {color{red}{G}}=Acup Nsubseteq Acup Ftext{ leads to}\
A^c &supseteq {color{red}{G^c}}=A^ccap N^csupseteq A^ccap F^c ,
end{aligned}
$$
so $G^c$ lies between two events in $mathcal G$ that differ by a null set,
$$
0le
Bbb P(A^c-(A^ccap F^c))
=
Bbb P(A^ccap F^{cc})
=
Bbb P(A^ccap F)
le
Bbb P(F)
=0
.
$$
$endgroup$
Let $G$ be an event in $mathcal G$, so we can write it in the form $G=Acup N$ with $Ainmathcal F$, $Ninmathcal N$, so $Nsubseteq F$, for some suitable $Fin mathcal F$, $Bbb P(F)=0$.
Then
$$
begin{aligned}
A &subseteq {color{red}{G}}=Acup Nsubseteq Acup Ftext{ leads to}\
A^c &supseteq {color{red}{G^c}}=A^ccap N^csupseteq A^ccap F^c ,
end{aligned}
$$
so $G^c$ lies between two events in $mathcal G$ that differ by a null set,
$$
0le
Bbb P(A^c-(A^ccap F^c))
=
Bbb P(A^ccap F^{cc})
=
Bbb P(A^ccap F)
le
Bbb P(F)
=0
.
$$
answered Jan 18 at 17:54
dan_fuleadan_fulea
7,1981513
7,1981513
$begingroup$
I got that $A^ccap F^csubseteq G^csubseteq A^c$, but how does $mathbb{P}(A^ccap F)=0$ leads us to $G^cinmathcal{G}$? @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 18 at 18:07
1
$begingroup$
$G^c$ is then between $A_1:=A^ccap F^c$ and $A_1cup N_1$ for that $N_1$ that makes $A_1cup N_1=A^c$.
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 18 at 18:11
$begingroup$
Sorry for stubborning but I still don't get it. We have $A_1=A^ccap F^csubseteq G^csubseteq A^c=A_1cup N_1$, but what does $G^c$ equal to for getting into the set $mathcal{G}$? @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 18 at 18:23
$begingroup$
$G^c=A_1cupcolor{red}{(G^c-A_1)}$ and the red entry is a subset of $N_1$. Thanks for asking, please always ask, do not even hesitate to do it. It is then my fault of not finding the argument that hits the point...
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 18 at 18:27
$begingroup$
We need that $G^c-A_1=(A^ccap N^c)-(A^ccap F^c)inmathcal{N}$. Why is that true? I observe that $G^c-A_1subseteq A^ccap N^c$ but not sure if it helps. @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 19 at 9:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I got that $A^ccap F^csubseteq G^csubseteq A^c$, but how does $mathbb{P}(A^ccap F)=0$ leads us to $G^cinmathcal{G}$? @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 18 at 18:07
1
$begingroup$
$G^c$ is then between $A_1:=A^ccap F^c$ and $A_1cup N_1$ for that $N_1$ that makes $A_1cup N_1=A^c$.
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 18 at 18:11
$begingroup$
Sorry for stubborning but I still don't get it. We have $A_1=A^ccap F^csubseteq G^csubseteq A^c=A_1cup N_1$, but what does $G^c$ equal to for getting into the set $mathcal{G}$? @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 18 at 18:23
$begingroup$
$G^c=A_1cupcolor{red}{(G^c-A_1)}$ and the red entry is a subset of $N_1$. Thanks for asking, please always ask, do not even hesitate to do it. It is then my fault of not finding the argument that hits the point...
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 18 at 18:27
$begingroup$
We need that $G^c-A_1=(A^ccap N^c)-(A^ccap F^c)inmathcal{N}$. Why is that true? I observe that $G^c-A_1subseteq A^ccap N^c$ but not sure if it helps. @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 19 at 9:59
$begingroup$
I got that $A^ccap F^csubseteq G^csubseteq A^c$, but how does $mathbb{P}(A^ccap F)=0$ leads us to $G^cinmathcal{G}$? @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 18 at 18:07
$begingroup$
I got that $A^ccap F^csubseteq G^csubseteq A^c$, but how does $mathbb{P}(A^ccap F)=0$ leads us to $G^cinmathcal{G}$? @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 18 at 18:07
1
1
$begingroup$
$G^c$ is then between $A_1:=A^ccap F^c$ and $A_1cup N_1$ for that $N_1$ that makes $A_1cup N_1=A^c$.
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 18 at 18:11
$begingroup$
$G^c$ is then between $A_1:=A^ccap F^c$ and $A_1cup N_1$ for that $N_1$ that makes $A_1cup N_1=A^c$.
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 18 at 18:11
$begingroup$
Sorry for stubborning but I still don't get it. We have $A_1=A^ccap F^csubseteq G^csubseteq A^c=A_1cup N_1$, but what does $G^c$ equal to for getting into the set $mathcal{G}$? @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 18 at 18:23
$begingroup$
Sorry for stubborning but I still don't get it. We have $A_1=A^ccap F^csubseteq G^csubseteq A^c=A_1cup N_1$, but what does $G^c$ equal to for getting into the set $mathcal{G}$? @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 18 at 18:23
$begingroup$
$G^c=A_1cupcolor{red}{(G^c-A_1)}$ and the red entry is a subset of $N_1$. Thanks for asking, please always ask, do not even hesitate to do it. It is then my fault of not finding the argument that hits the point...
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 18 at 18:27
$begingroup$
$G^c=A_1cupcolor{red}{(G^c-A_1)}$ and the red entry is a subset of $N_1$. Thanks for asking, please always ask, do not even hesitate to do it. It is then my fault of not finding the argument that hits the point...
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 18 at 18:27
$begingroup$
We need that $G^c-A_1=(A^ccap N^c)-(A^ccap F^c)inmathcal{N}$. Why is that true? I observe that $G^c-A_1subseteq A^ccap N^c$ but not sure if it helps. @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 19 at 9:59
$begingroup$
We need that $G^c-A_1=(A^ccap N^c)-(A^ccap F^c)inmathcal{N}$. Why is that true? I observe that $G^c-A_1subseteq A^ccap N^c$ but not sure if it helps. @dan_fulea
$endgroup$
– J. Doe
Jan 19 at 9:59
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078556%2fcompletion-of-a-sigma-algebra-is-a-sigma-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown