How do you compare the chances of two things which are theoretically possible, but have not occurred yet?
0
$begingroup$
An example I was thinking about was a player hitting 100 home runs in a season versus hitting 101 home runs in a season. And how would you compare an apples and oranges stat such as 100 home runs against 400 hits in a season?
probability
asked Jan 16 at 0:06
user209627user209627
91
$endgroup$
add a comment |
0
$begingroup$
An example I was thinking about was a player hitting 100 home runs in a season versus hitting 101 home runs in a season. And how would you compare an apples and oranges stat such as 100 home runs against 400 hits in a season?
probability
asked Jan 16 at 0:06
user209627user209627
91
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Well, you have to a model for predicting such things. Such a model would surely be based on all the available hitting statistics and would require a number of assumptions. Even with all of that, though, extrapolation of data to extremely unlikely scenarios is very, very unreliable.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 16 at 0:48
add a comment |
0
0
0
$begingroup$
An example I was thinking about was a player hitting 100 home runs in a season versus hitting 101 home runs in a season. And how would you compare an apples and oranges stat such as 100 home runs against 400 hits in a season?
probability
asked Jan 16 at 0:06
user209627user209627
91
$endgroup$
An example I was thinking about was a player hitting 100 home runs in a season versus hitting 101 home runs in a season. And how would you compare an apples and oranges stat such as 100 home runs against 400 hits in a season?
probability
probability
asked Jan 16 at 0:06
user209627user209627
91
asked Jan 16 at 0:06
user209627user209627
91
asked Jan 16 at 0:06
user209627user209627
91
asked Jan 16 at 0:06
user209627user209627
91
asked Jan 16 at 0:06
user209627user209627
91
91
$begingroup$
Well, you have to a model for predicting such things. Such a model would surely be based on all the available hitting statistics and would require a number of assumptions. Even with all of that, though, extrapolation of data to extremely unlikely scenarios is very, very unreliable.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 16 at 0:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well, you have to a model for predicting such things. Such a model would surely be based on all the available hitting statistics and would require a number of assumptions. Even with all of that, though, extrapolation of data to extremely unlikely scenarios is very, very unreliable.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 16 at 0:48
$begingroup$
Well, you have to a model for predicting such things. Such a model would surely be based on all the available hitting statistics and would require a number of assumptions. Even with all of that, though, extrapolation of data to extremely unlikely scenarios is very, very unreliable.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 16 at 0:48
$begingroup$
Well, you have to a model for predicting such things. Such a model would surely be based on all the available hitting statistics and would require a number of assumptions. Even with all of that, though, extrapolation of data to extremely unlikely scenarios is very, very unreliable.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 16 at 0:48
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075144%2fhow-do-you-compare-the-chances-of-two-things-which-are-theoretically-possible-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075144%2fhow-do-you-compare-the-chances-of-two-things-which-are-theoretically-possible-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Well, you have to a model for predicting such things. Such a model would surely be based on all the available hitting statistics and would require a number of assumptions. Even with all of that, though, extrapolation of data to extremely unlikely scenarios is very, very unreliable.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 16 at 0:48