C - Creating an anonymous struct instance












12















In this code, a structure is defined as follows:



typedef struct
{
int line;
int column;
} Pos;


And later used this way:



Pos get_pos ( int delta )
{
...

return ( Pos ){ f->line, f->column + delta };
}


The line, return ( Pos ){ f->line, f->column + delta } seems to be creating an anonymous instance of the struct Pos with initialized values. What is this technique called and how does it work? Where can I learn more about it?










share|improve this question




















  • 7





    "Compound literal", since C99.

    – Amadan
    Feb 8 at 4:20






  • 4





    C11 Standard - 6.5.2.5 Compound literals

    – David C. Rankin
    Feb 8 at 4:24











  • stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/… . There doesn't seem to be a canonical question, maybe this could be it

    – M.M
    Feb 8 at 4:25













  • Thanks! Updated the question tag accordingly.

    – Jet Blue
    Feb 8 at 7:18
















12















In this code, a structure is defined as follows:



typedef struct
{
int line;
int column;
} Pos;


And later used this way:



Pos get_pos ( int delta )
{
...

return ( Pos ){ f->line, f->column + delta };
}


The line, return ( Pos ){ f->line, f->column + delta } seems to be creating an anonymous instance of the struct Pos with initialized values. What is this technique called and how does it work? Where can I learn more about it?










share|improve this question




















  • 7





    "Compound literal", since C99.

    – Amadan
    Feb 8 at 4:20






  • 4





    C11 Standard - 6.5.2.5 Compound literals

    – David C. Rankin
    Feb 8 at 4:24











  • stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/… . There doesn't seem to be a canonical question, maybe this could be it

    – M.M
    Feb 8 at 4:25













  • Thanks! Updated the question tag accordingly.

    – Jet Blue
    Feb 8 at 7:18














12












12








12


1






In this code, a structure is defined as follows:



typedef struct
{
int line;
int column;
} Pos;


And later used this way:



Pos get_pos ( int delta )
{
...

return ( Pos ){ f->line, f->column + delta };
}


The line, return ( Pos ){ f->line, f->column + delta } seems to be creating an anonymous instance of the struct Pos with initialized values. What is this technique called and how does it work? Where can I learn more about it?










share|improve this question
















In this code, a structure is defined as follows:



typedef struct
{
int line;
int column;
} Pos;


And later used this way:



Pos get_pos ( int delta )
{
...

return ( Pos ){ f->line, f->column + delta };
}


The line, return ( Pos ){ f->line, f->column + delta } seems to be creating an anonymous instance of the struct Pos with initialized values. What is this technique called and how does it work? Where can I learn more about it?







c struct compound-literals






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 8 at 7:12







Jet Blue

















asked Feb 8 at 4:18









Jet BlueJet Blue

2,1821825




2,1821825








  • 7





    "Compound literal", since C99.

    – Amadan
    Feb 8 at 4:20






  • 4





    C11 Standard - 6.5.2.5 Compound literals

    – David C. Rankin
    Feb 8 at 4:24











  • stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/… . There doesn't seem to be a canonical question, maybe this could be it

    – M.M
    Feb 8 at 4:25













  • Thanks! Updated the question tag accordingly.

    – Jet Blue
    Feb 8 at 7:18














  • 7





    "Compound literal", since C99.

    – Amadan
    Feb 8 at 4:20






  • 4





    C11 Standard - 6.5.2.5 Compound literals

    – David C. Rankin
    Feb 8 at 4:24











  • stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/… . There doesn't seem to be a canonical question, maybe this could be it

    – M.M
    Feb 8 at 4:25













  • Thanks! Updated the question tag accordingly.

    – Jet Blue
    Feb 8 at 7:18








7




7





"Compound literal", since C99.

– Amadan
Feb 8 at 4:20





"Compound literal", since C99.

– Amadan
Feb 8 at 4:20




4




4





C11 Standard - 6.5.2.5 Compound literals

– David C. Rankin
Feb 8 at 4:24





C11 Standard - 6.5.2.5 Compound literals

– David C. Rankin
Feb 8 at 4:24













stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/… . There doesn't seem to be a canonical question, maybe this could be it

– M.M
Feb 8 at 4:25







stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/… . There doesn't seem to be a canonical question, maybe this could be it

– M.M
Feb 8 at 4:25















Thanks! Updated the question tag accordingly.

– Jet Blue
Feb 8 at 7:18





Thanks! Updated the question tag accordingly.

– Jet Blue
Feb 8 at 7:18












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















10














This is called a compound literal, and is documented in section 6.5.2.5 of the C standard.



An excerpt of this section is as follows:




3 A postfix expression that consists of a parenthesized type name followed by a brace- enclosed list of initializers is a
compound literal. It provides an unnamed object whose value is
given by the initializer list.



4 If the type name specifies an array of unknown size, the size is determined by the initializer list as specified in
6.7.9, and the type of the compound literal is that of the completed array type. Otherwise (when the type name specifies an
object type), the type of the compound literal is that specified by
the type name. In either case, the result is an lvalue.



5 The value of the compound literal is that of an unnamed object initialized by the initializer list. If the compound
literal occurs outside the body of a function, the object has
static storage duration; otherwise, it has automatic storage
duration associated with the enclosing block.




In your case the compound literal is for a struct, but they can be created for arrays as well. Paragraph 8 gives an example:




8 EXAMPLE 1 The file scope definition



int *p = (int ){2, 4};


initializes p to point to the first element of an array of
two ints, the first having the value two and the second,
four. The expressions in this compound literal are required
to be constant. The unnamed object has static storage duration.




Note also that a compound literal is an lvalue, which means you can take its address:



Pos *p = &( Pos ){ f->line, f->column + delta };


This object has a lifetime associated with its scope, meaning that once the scope ends the object no longer exists. So don't carry around its address after it goes out of scope.



You can also use a compound literal with a designated initializer:



return ( Pos ){ .line=f->line, .column=f->column + delta };





share|improve this answer


























  • So it applies to all type (not only aggregates)?

    – Some Name
    Feb 8 at 7:01






  • 1





    @SomeName As it turns out, yes. int x = (int){4}; compiles, although there's not much use in using it for basic types.

    – dbush
    Feb 8 at 12:59














Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54585928%2fc-creating-an-anonymous-struct-instance%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









10














This is called a compound literal, and is documented in section 6.5.2.5 of the C standard.



An excerpt of this section is as follows:




3 A postfix expression that consists of a parenthesized type name followed by a brace- enclosed list of initializers is a
compound literal. It provides an unnamed object whose value is
given by the initializer list.



4 If the type name specifies an array of unknown size, the size is determined by the initializer list as specified in
6.7.9, and the type of the compound literal is that of the completed array type. Otherwise (when the type name specifies an
object type), the type of the compound literal is that specified by
the type name. In either case, the result is an lvalue.



5 The value of the compound literal is that of an unnamed object initialized by the initializer list. If the compound
literal occurs outside the body of a function, the object has
static storage duration; otherwise, it has automatic storage
duration associated with the enclosing block.




In your case the compound literal is for a struct, but they can be created for arrays as well. Paragraph 8 gives an example:




8 EXAMPLE 1 The file scope definition



int *p = (int ){2, 4};


initializes p to point to the first element of an array of
two ints, the first having the value two and the second,
four. The expressions in this compound literal are required
to be constant. The unnamed object has static storage duration.




Note also that a compound literal is an lvalue, which means you can take its address:



Pos *p = &( Pos ){ f->line, f->column + delta };


This object has a lifetime associated with its scope, meaning that once the scope ends the object no longer exists. So don't carry around its address after it goes out of scope.



You can also use a compound literal with a designated initializer:



return ( Pos ){ .line=f->line, .column=f->column + delta };





share|improve this answer


























  • So it applies to all type (not only aggregates)?

    – Some Name
    Feb 8 at 7:01






  • 1





    @SomeName As it turns out, yes. int x = (int){4}; compiles, although there's not much use in using it for basic types.

    – dbush
    Feb 8 at 12:59


















10














This is called a compound literal, and is documented in section 6.5.2.5 of the C standard.



An excerpt of this section is as follows:




3 A postfix expression that consists of a parenthesized type name followed by a brace- enclosed list of initializers is a
compound literal. It provides an unnamed object whose value is
given by the initializer list.



4 If the type name specifies an array of unknown size, the size is determined by the initializer list as specified in
6.7.9, and the type of the compound literal is that of the completed array type. Otherwise (when the type name specifies an
object type), the type of the compound literal is that specified by
the type name. In either case, the result is an lvalue.



5 The value of the compound literal is that of an unnamed object initialized by the initializer list. If the compound
literal occurs outside the body of a function, the object has
static storage duration; otherwise, it has automatic storage
duration associated with the enclosing block.




In your case the compound literal is for a struct, but they can be created for arrays as well. Paragraph 8 gives an example:




8 EXAMPLE 1 The file scope definition



int *p = (int ){2, 4};


initializes p to point to the first element of an array of
two ints, the first having the value two and the second,
four. The expressions in this compound literal are required
to be constant. The unnamed object has static storage duration.




Note also that a compound literal is an lvalue, which means you can take its address:



Pos *p = &( Pos ){ f->line, f->column + delta };


This object has a lifetime associated with its scope, meaning that once the scope ends the object no longer exists. So don't carry around its address after it goes out of scope.



You can also use a compound literal with a designated initializer:



return ( Pos ){ .line=f->line, .column=f->column + delta };





share|improve this answer


























  • So it applies to all type (not only aggregates)?

    – Some Name
    Feb 8 at 7:01






  • 1





    @SomeName As it turns out, yes. int x = (int){4}; compiles, although there's not much use in using it for basic types.

    – dbush
    Feb 8 at 12:59
















10












10








10







This is called a compound literal, and is documented in section 6.5.2.5 of the C standard.



An excerpt of this section is as follows:




3 A postfix expression that consists of a parenthesized type name followed by a brace- enclosed list of initializers is a
compound literal. It provides an unnamed object whose value is
given by the initializer list.



4 If the type name specifies an array of unknown size, the size is determined by the initializer list as specified in
6.7.9, and the type of the compound literal is that of the completed array type. Otherwise (when the type name specifies an
object type), the type of the compound literal is that specified by
the type name. In either case, the result is an lvalue.



5 The value of the compound literal is that of an unnamed object initialized by the initializer list. If the compound
literal occurs outside the body of a function, the object has
static storage duration; otherwise, it has automatic storage
duration associated with the enclosing block.




In your case the compound literal is for a struct, but they can be created for arrays as well. Paragraph 8 gives an example:




8 EXAMPLE 1 The file scope definition



int *p = (int ){2, 4};


initializes p to point to the first element of an array of
two ints, the first having the value two and the second,
four. The expressions in this compound literal are required
to be constant. The unnamed object has static storage duration.




Note also that a compound literal is an lvalue, which means you can take its address:



Pos *p = &( Pos ){ f->line, f->column + delta };


This object has a lifetime associated with its scope, meaning that once the scope ends the object no longer exists. So don't carry around its address after it goes out of scope.



You can also use a compound literal with a designated initializer:



return ( Pos ){ .line=f->line, .column=f->column + delta };





share|improve this answer















This is called a compound literal, and is documented in section 6.5.2.5 of the C standard.



An excerpt of this section is as follows:




3 A postfix expression that consists of a parenthesized type name followed by a brace- enclosed list of initializers is a
compound literal. It provides an unnamed object whose value is
given by the initializer list.



4 If the type name specifies an array of unknown size, the size is determined by the initializer list as specified in
6.7.9, and the type of the compound literal is that of the completed array type. Otherwise (when the type name specifies an
object type), the type of the compound literal is that specified by
the type name. In either case, the result is an lvalue.



5 The value of the compound literal is that of an unnamed object initialized by the initializer list. If the compound
literal occurs outside the body of a function, the object has
static storage duration; otherwise, it has automatic storage
duration associated with the enclosing block.




In your case the compound literal is for a struct, but they can be created for arrays as well. Paragraph 8 gives an example:




8 EXAMPLE 1 The file scope definition



int *p = (int ){2, 4};


initializes p to point to the first element of an array of
two ints, the first having the value two and the second,
four. The expressions in this compound literal are required
to be constant. The unnamed object has static storage duration.




Note also that a compound literal is an lvalue, which means you can take its address:



Pos *p = &( Pos ){ f->line, f->column + delta };


This object has a lifetime associated with its scope, meaning that once the scope ends the object no longer exists. So don't carry around its address after it goes out of scope.



You can also use a compound literal with a designated initializer:



return ( Pos ){ .line=f->line, .column=f->column + delta };






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Feb 8 at 18:40

























answered Feb 8 at 4:26









dbushdbush

103k13108145




103k13108145













  • So it applies to all type (not only aggregates)?

    – Some Name
    Feb 8 at 7:01






  • 1





    @SomeName As it turns out, yes. int x = (int){4}; compiles, although there's not much use in using it for basic types.

    – dbush
    Feb 8 at 12:59





















  • So it applies to all type (not only aggregates)?

    – Some Name
    Feb 8 at 7:01






  • 1





    @SomeName As it turns out, yes. int x = (int){4}; compiles, although there's not much use in using it for basic types.

    – dbush
    Feb 8 at 12:59



















So it applies to all type (not only aggregates)?

– Some Name
Feb 8 at 7:01





So it applies to all type (not only aggregates)?

– Some Name
Feb 8 at 7:01




1




1





@SomeName As it turns out, yes. int x = (int){4}; compiles, although there's not much use in using it for basic types.

– dbush
Feb 8 at 12:59







@SomeName As it turns out, yes. int x = (int){4}; compiles, although there's not much use in using it for basic types.

– dbush
Feb 8 at 12:59






















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54585928%2fc-creating-an-anonymous-struct-instance%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg