Geometric interpretation of torsion homology classes












10












$begingroup$


Suppose I have a homology class $x in H_1(M)$ which is torsion of order $k$ say. Suppose furthermore that $M$ has Dimension big enough, such that every element of $H_1$ and $H_2$ can be relalized as submanifold of $M$.



Now what is the geometric picture of this torsion class? If $kx=0$, then are there $k$ submanifolds $N_i$ of $M$ each which represents $x$ and such that there is a $2$-dimensional submanifold $Sigma$ such that its boundary is equal to $bigcup_i N_i$ ?



Does this also mean that $N_1,...,N_k$ are bordant to a submanifold which is the boundary of a proper embedded 2-disk of $M$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Have you ever seen a Mobius strip ? When you glue a disk to its boundary you get $RP^2$. The boundary of this strip which is twice the central circle therefore bounds. For classes in$ H_1$ which are torsion, you can think of a lens space, and draw the same sort of picture.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Jan 17 at 6:40


















10












$begingroup$


Suppose I have a homology class $x in H_1(M)$ which is torsion of order $k$ say. Suppose furthermore that $M$ has Dimension big enough, such that every element of $H_1$ and $H_2$ can be relalized as submanifold of $M$.



Now what is the geometric picture of this torsion class? If $kx=0$, then are there $k$ submanifolds $N_i$ of $M$ each which represents $x$ and such that there is a $2$-dimensional submanifold $Sigma$ such that its boundary is equal to $bigcup_i N_i$ ?



Does this also mean that $N_1,...,N_k$ are bordant to a submanifold which is the boundary of a proper embedded 2-disk of $M$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Have you ever seen a Mobius strip ? When you glue a disk to its boundary you get $RP^2$. The boundary of this strip which is twice the central circle therefore bounds. For classes in$ H_1$ which are torsion, you can think of a lens space, and draw the same sort of picture.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Jan 17 at 6:40
















10












10








10


2



$begingroup$


Suppose I have a homology class $x in H_1(M)$ which is torsion of order $k$ say. Suppose furthermore that $M$ has Dimension big enough, such that every element of $H_1$ and $H_2$ can be relalized as submanifold of $M$.



Now what is the geometric picture of this torsion class? If $kx=0$, then are there $k$ submanifolds $N_i$ of $M$ each which represents $x$ and such that there is a $2$-dimensional submanifold $Sigma$ such that its boundary is equal to $bigcup_i N_i$ ?



Does this also mean that $N_1,...,N_k$ are bordant to a submanifold which is the boundary of a proper embedded 2-disk of $M$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Suppose I have a homology class $x in H_1(M)$ which is torsion of order $k$ say. Suppose furthermore that $M$ has Dimension big enough, such that every element of $H_1$ and $H_2$ can be relalized as submanifold of $M$.



Now what is the geometric picture of this torsion class? If $kx=0$, then are there $k$ submanifolds $N_i$ of $M$ each which represents $x$ and such that there is a $2$-dimensional submanifold $Sigma$ such that its boundary is equal to $bigcup_i N_i$ ?



Does this also mean that $N_1,...,N_k$ are bordant to a submanifold which is the boundary of a proper embedded 2-disk of $M$?







algebraic-topology differential-topology geometric-topology






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Sep 17 '18 at 15:44









Wilhelm L.Wilhelm L.

41117




41117












  • $begingroup$
    Have you ever seen a Mobius strip ? When you glue a disk to its boundary you get $RP^2$. The boundary of this strip which is twice the central circle therefore bounds. For classes in$ H_1$ which are torsion, you can think of a lens space, and draw the same sort of picture.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Jan 17 at 6:40




















  • $begingroup$
    Have you ever seen a Mobius strip ? When you glue a disk to its boundary you get $RP^2$. The boundary of this strip which is twice the central circle therefore bounds. For classes in$ H_1$ which are torsion, you can think of a lens space, and draw the same sort of picture.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Jan 17 at 6:40


















$begingroup$
Have you ever seen a Mobius strip ? When you glue a disk to its boundary you get $RP^2$. The boundary of this strip which is twice the central circle therefore bounds. For classes in$ H_1$ which are torsion, you can think of a lens space, and draw the same sort of picture.
$endgroup$
– Thomas
Jan 17 at 6:40






$begingroup$
Have you ever seen a Mobius strip ? When you glue a disk to its boundary you get $RP^2$. The boundary of this strip which is twice the central circle therefore bounds. For classes in$ H_1$ which are torsion, you can think of a lens space, and draw the same sort of picture.
$endgroup$
– Thomas
Jan 17 at 6:40












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

I haven't thought enough to give a full answer, but hope this partial answer may be helpful.



Let me restrict to the case that $mathrm{dim}(M)=3$ and $M$ is connected. (The condition on the connectedness of $M$ is not a real restriction, as you can do it componentwise. For the dimension part, I don't have a full understanding, but I believe that the argument here may be extended without much effort to give an affirmative answer as in dimension 3.)



Then the problem is asking about




  1. the representability of the class $kx$ as an embedding of $k$ disjoint union of circles,

  2. the existence of an embedded surface that bounds the link from above.


First, it is well-known (if it is not obvious...) that you can represent $x$ by an embedded circle (ie, knot), say $K$. As the knot $K$ admits a tubular neighborhood, it is a trivial matter to obtain an embedded representative of $kx$ by shifting copies of the knot $K$ slightly inside the tubular neighborhood. This embedded representative(a link in $M$), say $L$, will be the $k$ submanifolds that you desire.



Now, you can also find $k-1$ bands connecting the components of the link $L$ which is pairwise disjoint, only intersecting the link $L$ on the boundary, and the union of $L$ and the bands are connected. (There are many methods to achieve this; my favorite is choosing $k-1$ paths connecting the components and taking a band neighborhood of the paths.) Taking a band sum of $L$ along these bands, you can obtain a knot $K'$ which still represents $kx$. As $kx$ is a trivial class, you can find a Seifert surface of $K'$; ie, there is a connected, orientable, embedded surface, say $S$, whose boundary $partial S'$ is $K'$. (This is standard in knot theory; a standard proof uses Morse theory.)



Now we are almost there; On the boundary $partial S'=K'$, there are distinguished arcs which consist of the boundary of the band. Then you can find a collection of disjoint arcs in $S'$ connecting a distinguished arc to the distinguished arc on the other side of the band. Removing a band neighborhood of these arcs from $S'$, the resulting surface $S$ bounds $L$(or a link isotopic to $L$; but it is a trivial matter to choose a proper band neighborhood to bound exactly $L$, not up to isotopy).



And for the second question, you can make a puncture on the interior of the surface $S$ to get a bordism to a boundary of a disk, and actually we showed better; the bordism can be made embedded.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2920355%2fgeometric-interpretation-of-torsion-homology-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    I haven't thought enough to give a full answer, but hope this partial answer may be helpful.



    Let me restrict to the case that $mathrm{dim}(M)=3$ and $M$ is connected. (The condition on the connectedness of $M$ is not a real restriction, as you can do it componentwise. For the dimension part, I don't have a full understanding, but I believe that the argument here may be extended without much effort to give an affirmative answer as in dimension 3.)



    Then the problem is asking about




    1. the representability of the class $kx$ as an embedding of $k$ disjoint union of circles,

    2. the existence of an embedded surface that bounds the link from above.


    First, it is well-known (if it is not obvious...) that you can represent $x$ by an embedded circle (ie, knot), say $K$. As the knot $K$ admits a tubular neighborhood, it is a trivial matter to obtain an embedded representative of $kx$ by shifting copies of the knot $K$ slightly inside the tubular neighborhood. This embedded representative(a link in $M$), say $L$, will be the $k$ submanifolds that you desire.



    Now, you can also find $k-1$ bands connecting the components of the link $L$ which is pairwise disjoint, only intersecting the link $L$ on the boundary, and the union of $L$ and the bands are connected. (There are many methods to achieve this; my favorite is choosing $k-1$ paths connecting the components and taking a band neighborhood of the paths.) Taking a band sum of $L$ along these bands, you can obtain a knot $K'$ which still represents $kx$. As $kx$ is a trivial class, you can find a Seifert surface of $K'$; ie, there is a connected, orientable, embedded surface, say $S$, whose boundary $partial S'$ is $K'$. (This is standard in knot theory; a standard proof uses Morse theory.)



    Now we are almost there; On the boundary $partial S'=K'$, there are distinguished arcs which consist of the boundary of the band. Then you can find a collection of disjoint arcs in $S'$ connecting a distinguished arc to the distinguished arc on the other side of the band. Removing a band neighborhood of these arcs from $S'$, the resulting surface $S$ bounds $L$(or a link isotopic to $L$; but it is a trivial matter to choose a proper band neighborhood to bound exactly $L$, not up to isotopy).



    And for the second question, you can make a puncture on the interior of the surface $S$ to get a bordism to a boundary of a disk, and actually we showed better; the bordism can be made embedded.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      I haven't thought enough to give a full answer, but hope this partial answer may be helpful.



      Let me restrict to the case that $mathrm{dim}(M)=3$ and $M$ is connected. (The condition on the connectedness of $M$ is not a real restriction, as you can do it componentwise. For the dimension part, I don't have a full understanding, but I believe that the argument here may be extended without much effort to give an affirmative answer as in dimension 3.)



      Then the problem is asking about




      1. the representability of the class $kx$ as an embedding of $k$ disjoint union of circles,

      2. the existence of an embedded surface that bounds the link from above.


      First, it is well-known (if it is not obvious...) that you can represent $x$ by an embedded circle (ie, knot), say $K$. As the knot $K$ admits a tubular neighborhood, it is a trivial matter to obtain an embedded representative of $kx$ by shifting copies of the knot $K$ slightly inside the tubular neighborhood. This embedded representative(a link in $M$), say $L$, will be the $k$ submanifolds that you desire.



      Now, you can also find $k-1$ bands connecting the components of the link $L$ which is pairwise disjoint, only intersecting the link $L$ on the boundary, and the union of $L$ and the bands are connected. (There are many methods to achieve this; my favorite is choosing $k-1$ paths connecting the components and taking a band neighborhood of the paths.) Taking a band sum of $L$ along these bands, you can obtain a knot $K'$ which still represents $kx$. As $kx$ is a trivial class, you can find a Seifert surface of $K'$; ie, there is a connected, orientable, embedded surface, say $S$, whose boundary $partial S'$ is $K'$. (This is standard in knot theory; a standard proof uses Morse theory.)



      Now we are almost there; On the boundary $partial S'=K'$, there are distinguished arcs which consist of the boundary of the band. Then you can find a collection of disjoint arcs in $S'$ connecting a distinguished arc to the distinguished arc on the other side of the band. Removing a band neighborhood of these arcs from $S'$, the resulting surface $S$ bounds $L$(or a link isotopic to $L$; but it is a trivial matter to choose a proper band neighborhood to bound exactly $L$, not up to isotopy).



      And for the second question, you can make a puncture on the interior of the surface $S$ to get a bordism to a boundary of a disk, and actually we showed better; the bordism can be made embedded.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        I haven't thought enough to give a full answer, but hope this partial answer may be helpful.



        Let me restrict to the case that $mathrm{dim}(M)=3$ and $M$ is connected. (The condition on the connectedness of $M$ is not a real restriction, as you can do it componentwise. For the dimension part, I don't have a full understanding, but I believe that the argument here may be extended without much effort to give an affirmative answer as in dimension 3.)



        Then the problem is asking about




        1. the representability of the class $kx$ as an embedding of $k$ disjoint union of circles,

        2. the existence of an embedded surface that bounds the link from above.


        First, it is well-known (if it is not obvious...) that you can represent $x$ by an embedded circle (ie, knot), say $K$. As the knot $K$ admits a tubular neighborhood, it is a trivial matter to obtain an embedded representative of $kx$ by shifting copies of the knot $K$ slightly inside the tubular neighborhood. This embedded representative(a link in $M$), say $L$, will be the $k$ submanifolds that you desire.



        Now, you can also find $k-1$ bands connecting the components of the link $L$ which is pairwise disjoint, only intersecting the link $L$ on the boundary, and the union of $L$ and the bands are connected. (There are many methods to achieve this; my favorite is choosing $k-1$ paths connecting the components and taking a band neighborhood of the paths.) Taking a band sum of $L$ along these bands, you can obtain a knot $K'$ which still represents $kx$. As $kx$ is a trivial class, you can find a Seifert surface of $K'$; ie, there is a connected, orientable, embedded surface, say $S$, whose boundary $partial S'$ is $K'$. (This is standard in knot theory; a standard proof uses Morse theory.)



        Now we are almost there; On the boundary $partial S'=K'$, there are distinguished arcs which consist of the boundary of the band. Then you can find a collection of disjoint arcs in $S'$ connecting a distinguished arc to the distinguished arc on the other side of the band. Removing a band neighborhood of these arcs from $S'$, the resulting surface $S$ bounds $L$(or a link isotopic to $L$; but it is a trivial matter to choose a proper band neighborhood to bound exactly $L$, not up to isotopy).



        And for the second question, you can make a puncture on the interior of the surface $S$ to get a bordism to a boundary of a disk, and actually we showed better; the bordism can be made embedded.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        I haven't thought enough to give a full answer, but hope this partial answer may be helpful.



        Let me restrict to the case that $mathrm{dim}(M)=3$ and $M$ is connected. (The condition on the connectedness of $M$ is not a real restriction, as you can do it componentwise. For the dimension part, I don't have a full understanding, but I believe that the argument here may be extended without much effort to give an affirmative answer as in dimension 3.)



        Then the problem is asking about




        1. the representability of the class $kx$ as an embedding of $k$ disjoint union of circles,

        2. the existence of an embedded surface that bounds the link from above.


        First, it is well-known (if it is not obvious...) that you can represent $x$ by an embedded circle (ie, knot), say $K$. As the knot $K$ admits a tubular neighborhood, it is a trivial matter to obtain an embedded representative of $kx$ by shifting copies of the knot $K$ slightly inside the tubular neighborhood. This embedded representative(a link in $M$), say $L$, will be the $k$ submanifolds that you desire.



        Now, you can also find $k-1$ bands connecting the components of the link $L$ which is pairwise disjoint, only intersecting the link $L$ on the boundary, and the union of $L$ and the bands are connected. (There are many methods to achieve this; my favorite is choosing $k-1$ paths connecting the components and taking a band neighborhood of the paths.) Taking a band sum of $L$ along these bands, you can obtain a knot $K'$ which still represents $kx$. As $kx$ is a trivial class, you can find a Seifert surface of $K'$; ie, there is a connected, orientable, embedded surface, say $S$, whose boundary $partial S'$ is $K'$. (This is standard in knot theory; a standard proof uses Morse theory.)



        Now we are almost there; On the boundary $partial S'=K'$, there are distinguished arcs which consist of the boundary of the band. Then you can find a collection of disjoint arcs in $S'$ connecting a distinguished arc to the distinguished arc on the other side of the band. Removing a band neighborhood of these arcs from $S'$, the resulting surface $S$ bounds $L$(or a link isotopic to $L$; but it is a trivial matter to choose a proper band neighborhood to bound exactly $L$, not up to isotopy).



        And for the second question, you can make a puncture on the interior of the surface $S$ to get a bordism to a boundary of a disk, and actually we showed better; the bordism can be made embedded.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 17 at 6:18









        cjackalcjackal

        1,523813




        1,523813






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2920355%2fgeometric-interpretation-of-torsion-homology-classes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg