When is the set of tensors of rank at most $r$ closed?
Consider the vector space $V=A_1otimes A_2otimesdotsotimes A_k$ where $kgeq 2$ and let $sigma_r$ be the set of tensors in $V$ of rank at most $r$. It seems clear that $sigma_r$ is Zariski (Euclidean?) closed in the following cases :
1 - $k=2$ and $r$ is anything
2 - $r=1$ and $k$ is anything
3 - $sigma_r=V$
Is this list complete? Can I change the third case as $r=prod_{i=1}^k dim A_i$ and if not with some other integral condition on $r$?
algebraic-geometry multilinear-algebra
|
show 1 more comment
Consider the vector space $V=A_1otimes A_2otimesdotsotimes A_k$ where $kgeq 2$ and let $sigma_r$ be the set of tensors in $V$ of rank at most $r$. It seems clear that $sigma_r$ is Zariski (Euclidean?) closed in the following cases :
1 - $k=2$ and $r$ is anything
2 - $r=1$ and $k$ is anything
3 - $sigma_r=V$
Is this list complete? Can I change the third case as $r=prod_{i=1}^k dim A_i$ and if not with some other integral condition on $r$?
algebraic-geometry multilinear-algebra
What is your definition for rank of a tensor?
– KReiser
Sep 13 '18 at 18:18
3
A rank one tensor is a tensor $Tin V$ of the form $T=a_1otimes a_2otimesdotsotimes a_k$. The rank of a tensor $T$ is the smallest number $r$ such that $T$ can be written as the sum of $r$ rank one tensors.
– Levent
Sep 13 '18 at 20:21
1
If $V$ has the structure of a finite dimensional (real hausdorff) topological vector space, then: yes. Since you mention the Zariski topology (and euclidean?) I am not sure what your setting is.
– s.harp
Nov 21 '18 at 9:58
1
Above, each $A_i$ is a finite dimensional complex vector space hence $V$ admits the Zariski topology.
– Levent
Nov 21 '18 at 10:05
You have to specify which topology you are working with: Zariski topology or Euclidean topology. I think the answer to your question depends on this.
– Moishe Cohen
Dec 24 '18 at 15:48
|
show 1 more comment
Consider the vector space $V=A_1otimes A_2otimesdotsotimes A_k$ where $kgeq 2$ and let $sigma_r$ be the set of tensors in $V$ of rank at most $r$. It seems clear that $sigma_r$ is Zariski (Euclidean?) closed in the following cases :
1 - $k=2$ and $r$ is anything
2 - $r=1$ and $k$ is anything
3 - $sigma_r=V$
Is this list complete? Can I change the third case as $r=prod_{i=1}^k dim A_i$ and if not with some other integral condition on $r$?
algebraic-geometry multilinear-algebra
Consider the vector space $V=A_1otimes A_2otimesdotsotimes A_k$ where $kgeq 2$ and let $sigma_r$ be the set of tensors in $V$ of rank at most $r$. It seems clear that $sigma_r$ is Zariski (Euclidean?) closed in the following cases :
1 - $k=2$ and $r$ is anything
2 - $r=1$ and $k$ is anything
3 - $sigma_r=V$
Is this list complete? Can I change the third case as $r=prod_{i=1}^k dim A_i$ and if not with some other integral condition on $r$?
algebraic-geometry multilinear-algebra
algebraic-geometry multilinear-algebra
edited Dec 22 '18 at 15:56
asked Sep 13 '18 at 14:32
Levent
2,688925
2,688925
What is your definition for rank of a tensor?
– KReiser
Sep 13 '18 at 18:18
3
A rank one tensor is a tensor $Tin V$ of the form $T=a_1otimes a_2otimesdotsotimes a_k$. The rank of a tensor $T$ is the smallest number $r$ such that $T$ can be written as the sum of $r$ rank one tensors.
– Levent
Sep 13 '18 at 20:21
1
If $V$ has the structure of a finite dimensional (real hausdorff) topological vector space, then: yes. Since you mention the Zariski topology (and euclidean?) I am not sure what your setting is.
– s.harp
Nov 21 '18 at 9:58
1
Above, each $A_i$ is a finite dimensional complex vector space hence $V$ admits the Zariski topology.
– Levent
Nov 21 '18 at 10:05
You have to specify which topology you are working with: Zariski topology or Euclidean topology. I think the answer to your question depends on this.
– Moishe Cohen
Dec 24 '18 at 15:48
|
show 1 more comment
What is your definition for rank of a tensor?
– KReiser
Sep 13 '18 at 18:18
3
A rank one tensor is a tensor $Tin V$ of the form $T=a_1otimes a_2otimesdotsotimes a_k$. The rank of a tensor $T$ is the smallest number $r$ such that $T$ can be written as the sum of $r$ rank one tensors.
– Levent
Sep 13 '18 at 20:21
1
If $V$ has the structure of a finite dimensional (real hausdorff) topological vector space, then: yes. Since you mention the Zariski topology (and euclidean?) I am not sure what your setting is.
– s.harp
Nov 21 '18 at 9:58
1
Above, each $A_i$ is a finite dimensional complex vector space hence $V$ admits the Zariski topology.
– Levent
Nov 21 '18 at 10:05
You have to specify which topology you are working with: Zariski topology or Euclidean topology. I think the answer to your question depends on this.
– Moishe Cohen
Dec 24 '18 at 15:48
What is your definition for rank of a tensor?
– KReiser
Sep 13 '18 at 18:18
What is your definition for rank of a tensor?
– KReiser
Sep 13 '18 at 18:18
3
3
A rank one tensor is a tensor $Tin V$ of the form $T=a_1otimes a_2otimesdotsotimes a_k$. The rank of a tensor $T$ is the smallest number $r$ such that $T$ can be written as the sum of $r$ rank one tensors.
– Levent
Sep 13 '18 at 20:21
A rank one tensor is a tensor $Tin V$ of the form $T=a_1otimes a_2otimesdotsotimes a_k$. The rank of a tensor $T$ is the smallest number $r$ such that $T$ can be written as the sum of $r$ rank one tensors.
– Levent
Sep 13 '18 at 20:21
1
1
If $V$ has the structure of a finite dimensional (real hausdorff) topological vector space, then: yes. Since you mention the Zariski topology (and euclidean?) I am not sure what your setting is.
– s.harp
Nov 21 '18 at 9:58
If $V$ has the structure of a finite dimensional (real hausdorff) topological vector space, then: yes. Since you mention the Zariski topology (and euclidean?) I am not sure what your setting is.
– s.harp
Nov 21 '18 at 9:58
1
1
Above, each $A_i$ is a finite dimensional complex vector space hence $V$ admits the Zariski topology.
– Levent
Nov 21 '18 at 10:05
Above, each $A_i$ is a finite dimensional complex vector space hence $V$ admits the Zariski topology.
– Levent
Nov 21 '18 at 10:05
You have to specify which topology you are working with: Zariski topology or Euclidean topology. I think the answer to your question depends on this.
– Moishe Cohen
Dec 24 '18 at 15:48
You have to specify which topology you are working with: Zariski topology or Euclidean topology. I think the answer to your question depends on this.
– Moishe Cohen
Dec 24 '18 at 15:48
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
- First of all, the maximal possible rank of degree $k$ tensors is bounded from above by
$$
R=prod_{i=1}^{k-1} dim(A_i).
$$
Here and below the indices are arranged so that
$$2le n_1= dim(A_1)le n_2= dim(A_2)le ...le n_k= dim(A_k).$$
See for instance
M.V. Catalisano, A.V. Geramita, A. Gimigliano,
"Ranks of tensors, secant varieties of Segre varieties and fat points",
Linear Algebra Appl. 355 (2002) 263-285.
This bound is better than the one that you wrote in the last part of your question. In particular, $sigma_R$ equals the entire tensor product
$$
V= A_1otimes ... otimes A_k,
$$
which is, of course, Zariski closed.
- There are some Zariski closed examples besides the ones that you listed. For instance (I am working over ${mathbb C}$),
consider triples
$$
(n_1,n_2,n_3)= (2, 2, n), nge 4.
$$
Then in $V={mathbb C}^2 otimes {mathbb C}^2 otimes {mathbb C}^n$,
all tensors of rank =4 also have the border rank =4, see Table 10.3.1 on page 253 of
J.Landsberg, "Tensors: Geometry and Applications", AMS, 2011.
This means that the set $sigma_3subset V$ of tensors of rank $le 3$ is closed. (In contrast, $sigma_2$ is not closed.)
At the same time, since $nge 4$, $V=sigma_4ne sigma_3$.
I very much doubt that a complete list of tuples $(n_1,...,n_k,r)$ for which $sigma_r$ is Zariski closed is known. Among general results on lack of closedness in the classical topology the following is known, see
V. De Silva, L.-H. Lim, "Tensor rank and the ill-posedness of the best low-rank approximation problem," SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 30 (2008) 1084-1127.
Theorem. Suppose $kge 3$ and
$$
2le rle min(n_1,...,n_k).
$$
Then $sigma_r$ is not closed in the classical topology. (Hence, it is not closed in the Zariski topology either.)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2915670%2fwhen-is-the-set-of-tensors-of-rank-at-most-r-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
- First of all, the maximal possible rank of degree $k$ tensors is bounded from above by
$$
R=prod_{i=1}^{k-1} dim(A_i).
$$
Here and below the indices are arranged so that
$$2le n_1= dim(A_1)le n_2= dim(A_2)le ...le n_k= dim(A_k).$$
See for instance
M.V. Catalisano, A.V. Geramita, A. Gimigliano,
"Ranks of tensors, secant varieties of Segre varieties and fat points",
Linear Algebra Appl. 355 (2002) 263-285.
This bound is better than the one that you wrote in the last part of your question. In particular, $sigma_R$ equals the entire tensor product
$$
V= A_1otimes ... otimes A_k,
$$
which is, of course, Zariski closed.
- There are some Zariski closed examples besides the ones that you listed. For instance (I am working over ${mathbb C}$),
consider triples
$$
(n_1,n_2,n_3)= (2, 2, n), nge 4.
$$
Then in $V={mathbb C}^2 otimes {mathbb C}^2 otimes {mathbb C}^n$,
all tensors of rank =4 also have the border rank =4, see Table 10.3.1 on page 253 of
J.Landsberg, "Tensors: Geometry and Applications", AMS, 2011.
This means that the set $sigma_3subset V$ of tensors of rank $le 3$ is closed. (In contrast, $sigma_2$ is not closed.)
At the same time, since $nge 4$, $V=sigma_4ne sigma_3$.
I very much doubt that a complete list of tuples $(n_1,...,n_k,r)$ for which $sigma_r$ is Zariski closed is known. Among general results on lack of closedness in the classical topology the following is known, see
V. De Silva, L.-H. Lim, "Tensor rank and the ill-posedness of the best low-rank approximation problem," SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 30 (2008) 1084-1127.
Theorem. Suppose $kge 3$ and
$$
2le rle min(n_1,...,n_k).
$$
Then $sigma_r$ is not closed in the classical topology. (Hence, it is not closed in the Zariski topology either.)
add a comment |
- First of all, the maximal possible rank of degree $k$ tensors is bounded from above by
$$
R=prod_{i=1}^{k-1} dim(A_i).
$$
Here and below the indices are arranged so that
$$2le n_1= dim(A_1)le n_2= dim(A_2)le ...le n_k= dim(A_k).$$
See for instance
M.V. Catalisano, A.V. Geramita, A. Gimigliano,
"Ranks of tensors, secant varieties of Segre varieties and fat points",
Linear Algebra Appl. 355 (2002) 263-285.
This bound is better than the one that you wrote in the last part of your question. In particular, $sigma_R$ equals the entire tensor product
$$
V= A_1otimes ... otimes A_k,
$$
which is, of course, Zariski closed.
- There are some Zariski closed examples besides the ones that you listed. For instance (I am working over ${mathbb C}$),
consider triples
$$
(n_1,n_2,n_3)= (2, 2, n), nge 4.
$$
Then in $V={mathbb C}^2 otimes {mathbb C}^2 otimes {mathbb C}^n$,
all tensors of rank =4 also have the border rank =4, see Table 10.3.1 on page 253 of
J.Landsberg, "Tensors: Geometry and Applications", AMS, 2011.
This means that the set $sigma_3subset V$ of tensors of rank $le 3$ is closed. (In contrast, $sigma_2$ is not closed.)
At the same time, since $nge 4$, $V=sigma_4ne sigma_3$.
I very much doubt that a complete list of tuples $(n_1,...,n_k,r)$ for which $sigma_r$ is Zariski closed is known. Among general results on lack of closedness in the classical topology the following is known, see
V. De Silva, L.-H. Lim, "Tensor rank and the ill-posedness of the best low-rank approximation problem," SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 30 (2008) 1084-1127.
Theorem. Suppose $kge 3$ and
$$
2le rle min(n_1,...,n_k).
$$
Then $sigma_r$ is not closed in the classical topology. (Hence, it is not closed in the Zariski topology either.)
add a comment |
- First of all, the maximal possible rank of degree $k$ tensors is bounded from above by
$$
R=prod_{i=1}^{k-1} dim(A_i).
$$
Here and below the indices are arranged so that
$$2le n_1= dim(A_1)le n_2= dim(A_2)le ...le n_k= dim(A_k).$$
See for instance
M.V. Catalisano, A.V. Geramita, A. Gimigliano,
"Ranks of tensors, secant varieties of Segre varieties and fat points",
Linear Algebra Appl. 355 (2002) 263-285.
This bound is better than the one that you wrote in the last part of your question. In particular, $sigma_R$ equals the entire tensor product
$$
V= A_1otimes ... otimes A_k,
$$
which is, of course, Zariski closed.
- There are some Zariski closed examples besides the ones that you listed. For instance (I am working over ${mathbb C}$),
consider triples
$$
(n_1,n_2,n_3)= (2, 2, n), nge 4.
$$
Then in $V={mathbb C}^2 otimes {mathbb C}^2 otimes {mathbb C}^n$,
all tensors of rank =4 also have the border rank =4, see Table 10.3.1 on page 253 of
J.Landsberg, "Tensors: Geometry and Applications", AMS, 2011.
This means that the set $sigma_3subset V$ of tensors of rank $le 3$ is closed. (In contrast, $sigma_2$ is not closed.)
At the same time, since $nge 4$, $V=sigma_4ne sigma_3$.
I very much doubt that a complete list of tuples $(n_1,...,n_k,r)$ for which $sigma_r$ is Zariski closed is known. Among general results on lack of closedness in the classical topology the following is known, see
V. De Silva, L.-H. Lim, "Tensor rank and the ill-posedness of the best low-rank approximation problem," SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 30 (2008) 1084-1127.
Theorem. Suppose $kge 3$ and
$$
2le rle min(n_1,...,n_k).
$$
Then $sigma_r$ is not closed in the classical topology. (Hence, it is not closed in the Zariski topology either.)
- First of all, the maximal possible rank of degree $k$ tensors is bounded from above by
$$
R=prod_{i=1}^{k-1} dim(A_i).
$$
Here and below the indices are arranged so that
$$2le n_1= dim(A_1)le n_2= dim(A_2)le ...le n_k= dim(A_k).$$
See for instance
M.V. Catalisano, A.V. Geramita, A. Gimigliano,
"Ranks of tensors, secant varieties of Segre varieties and fat points",
Linear Algebra Appl. 355 (2002) 263-285.
This bound is better than the one that you wrote in the last part of your question. In particular, $sigma_R$ equals the entire tensor product
$$
V= A_1otimes ... otimes A_k,
$$
which is, of course, Zariski closed.
- There are some Zariski closed examples besides the ones that you listed. For instance (I am working over ${mathbb C}$),
consider triples
$$
(n_1,n_2,n_3)= (2, 2, n), nge 4.
$$
Then in $V={mathbb C}^2 otimes {mathbb C}^2 otimes {mathbb C}^n$,
all tensors of rank =4 also have the border rank =4, see Table 10.3.1 on page 253 of
J.Landsberg, "Tensors: Geometry and Applications", AMS, 2011.
This means that the set $sigma_3subset V$ of tensors of rank $le 3$ is closed. (In contrast, $sigma_2$ is not closed.)
At the same time, since $nge 4$, $V=sigma_4ne sigma_3$.
I very much doubt that a complete list of tuples $(n_1,...,n_k,r)$ for which $sigma_r$ is Zariski closed is known. Among general results on lack of closedness in the classical topology the following is known, see
V. De Silva, L.-H. Lim, "Tensor rank and the ill-posedness of the best low-rank approximation problem," SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 30 (2008) 1084-1127.
Theorem. Suppose $kge 3$ and
$$
2le rle min(n_1,...,n_k).
$$
Then $sigma_r$ is not closed in the classical topology. (Hence, it is not closed in the Zariski topology either.)
edited Dec 26 '18 at 23:27
answered Dec 26 '18 at 23:03
Moishe Cohen
45.8k342104
45.8k342104
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2915670%2fwhen-is-the-set-of-tensors-of-rank-at-most-r-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What is your definition for rank of a tensor?
– KReiser
Sep 13 '18 at 18:18
3
A rank one tensor is a tensor $Tin V$ of the form $T=a_1otimes a_2otimesdotsotimes a_k$. The rank of a tensor $T$ is the smallest number $r$ such that $T$ can be written as the sum of $r$ rank one tensors.
– Levent
Sep 13 '18 at 20:21
1
If $V$ has the structure of a finite dimensional (real hausdorff) topological vector space, then: yes. Since you mention the Zariski topology (and euclidean?) I am not sure what your setting is.
– s.harp
Nov 21 '18 at 9:58
1
Above, each $A_i$ is a finite dimensional complex vector space hence $V$ admits the Zariski topology.
– Levent
Nov 21 '18 at 10:05
You have to specify which topology you are working with: Zariski topology or Euclidean topology. I think the answer to your question depends on this.
– Moishe Cohen
Dec 24 '18 at 15:48