Is my definition correct? How do I prove the finite union of elements of $mathscr U$ lie in $mathscr U$?
$begingroup$
Definition of basis for a topology on $X$ given in the Foundation of Topology By Patty given by
Let $(X,mathscr T)$ be a topological space. A basis for $mathscr T$
is a subcollection $mathscr B$ of $mathscr T$ with the property that
if $Uin mathscr T$ then $U=emptyset$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr B'$ such that $U=bigcup {B:Bin mathscr B'}$
How do I write the definition of basis for the family of closed sets?
My attempt:-
Let $(X,mathscr U)$ be a family of closed sets(closed sets of topology on $X$). A basis for $mathscr
U$ is a subcollection $mathscr D$ of $mathscr U$ with the property
that if $Din mathscr U$ then $D=X$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr D'$ such that $D=bigcap {D:Din mathscr D'}$
am I correct?
My next aim is to prove the following Result. This result I have seen in the answer given by Brian M Scott.
A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$ iff
$bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and
- if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.
My attempt for the proof:-
Suppose A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X.$
claim 1:- $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$
$varnothing in mathscr U$. so by the definition of basis there is a subcollection $mathscr X'$: $varnothing=bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X'}$. Hence,$bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing.$
Claim 2:-if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$
if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X implies D_0,D_1in mathscr U implies D_0 cup D_1 in mathscr U implies exists mathscr X'':D_0 cup D_1 =bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X''}. $ If $xnotin D_0 cup D_1 implies exists C'in mathscr X'': x notin C'.$
Conversely suppose family of subsets $mathscr X$ satisfies the following
I. $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and
II. if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.
Claim:-A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$. Let $mathscr
U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$. Our aim is to prove $mathscr U$ is topology of closed sets on $x$.
(a)$Xin mathscr U(because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U$). $emptyset in mathscr U (because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U $ and (I)).
(b)Arbitrary intersection of closed set lie in the $mathscr U$ immediately.
(c)How do I prove the finite union of elements of $mathscr U$ lie in $mathscr U$?
general-topology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Definition of basis for a topology on $X$ given in the Foundation of Topology By Patty given by
Let $(X,mathscr T)$ be a topological space. A basis for $mathscr T$
is a subcollection $mathscr B$ of $mathscr T$ with the property that
if $Uin mathscr T$ then $U=emptyset$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr B'$ such that $U=bigcup {B:Bin mathscr B'}$
How do I write the definition of basis for the family of closed sets?
My attempt:-
Let $(X,mathscr U)$ be a family of closed sets(closed sets of topology on $X$). A basis for $mathscr
U$ is a subcollection $mathscr D$ of $mathscr U$ with the property
that if $Din mathscr U$ then $D=X$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr D'$ such that $D=bigcap {D:Din mathscr D'}$
am I correct?
My next aim is to prove the following Result. This result I have seen in the answer given by Brian M Scott.
A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$ iff
$bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and
- if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.
My attempt for the proof:-
Suppose A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X.$
claim 1:- $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$
$varnothing in mathscr U$. so by the definition of basis there is a subcollection $mathscr X'$: $varnothing=bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X'}$. Hence,$bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing.$
Claim 2:-if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$
if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X implies D_0,D_1in mathscr U implies D_0 cup D_1 in mathscr U implies exists mathscr X'':D_0 cup D_1 =bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X''}. $ If $xnotin D_0 cup D_1 implies exists C'in mathscr X'': x notin C'.$
Conversely suppose family of subsets $mathscr X$ satisfies the following
I. $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and
II. if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.
Claim:-A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$. Let $mathscr
U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$. Our aim is to prove $mathscr U$ is topology of closed sets on $x$.
(a)$Xin mathscr U(because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U$). $emptyset in mathscr U (because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U $ and (I)).
(b)Arbitrary intersection of closed set lie in the $mathscr U$ immediately.
(c)How do I prove the finite union of elements of $mathscr U$ lie in $mathscr U$?
general-topology
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't understand your definition of $mathscr U$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 13 at 7:52
$begingroup$
Sir, I have corrected the definition of $mathscr U$. Let $mathscr U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 8:14
$begingroup$
I don't know what any of this means (some stuff, yes, but most stuff no), although I just want to say, thatmathscr
font is so pretty. Thank you for using it so I could see. $(+1)$ $color{orange}{bigstar}$ xD
$endgroup$
– user477343
Jan 13 at 11:14
$begingroup$
what do you mean? I don't understand :(
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 11:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Definition of basis for a topology on $X$ given in the Foundation of Topology By Patty given by
Let $(X,mathscr T)$ be a topological space. A basis for $mathscr T$
is a subcollection $mathscr B$ of $mathscr T$ with the property that
if $Uin mathscr T$ then $U=emptyset$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr B'$ such that $U=bigcup {B:Bin mathscr B'}$
How do I write the definition of basis for the family of closed sets?
My attempt:-
Let $(X,mathscr U)$ be a family of closed sets(closed sets of topology on $X$). A basis for $mathscr
U$ is a subcollection $mathscr D$ of $mathscr U$ with the property
that if $Din mathscr U$ then $D=X$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr D'$ such that $D=bigcap {D:Din mathscr D'}$
am I correct?
My next aim is to prove the following Result. This result I have seen in the answer given by Brian M Scott.
A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$ iff
$bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and
- if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.
My attempt for the proof:-
Suppose A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X.$
claim 1:- $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$
$varnothing in mathscr U$. so by the definition of basis there is a subcollection $mathscr X'$: $varnothing=bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X'}$. Hence,$bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing.$
Claim 2:-if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$
if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X implies D_0,D_1in mathscr U implies D_0 cup D_1 in mathscr U implies exists mathscr X'':D_0 cup D_1 =bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X''}. $ If $xnotin D_0 cup D_1 implies exists C'in mathscr X'': x notin C'.$
Conversely suppose family of subsets $mathscr X$ satisfies the following
I. $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and
II. if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.
Claim:-A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$. Let $mathscr
U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$. Our aim is to prove $mathscr U$ is topology of closed sets on $x$.
(a)$Xin mathscr U(because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U$). $emptyset in mathscr U (because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U $ and (I)).
(b)Arbitrary intersection of closed set lie in the $mathscr U$ immediately.
(c)How do I prove the finite union of elements of $mathscr U$ lie in $mathscr U$?
general-topology
$endgroup$
Definition of basis for a topology on $X$ given in the Foundation of Topology By Patty given by
Let $(X,mathscr T)$ be a topological space. A basis for $mathscr T$
is a subcollection $mathscr B$ of $mathscr T$ with the property that
if $Uin mathscr T$ then $U=emptyset$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr B'$ such that $U=bigcup {B:Bin mathscr B'}$
How do I write the definition of basis for the family of closed sets?
My attempt:-
Let $(X,mathscr U)$ be a family of closed sets(closed sets of topology on $X$). A basis for $mathscr
U$ is a subcollection $mathscr D$ of $mathscr U$ with the property
that if $Din mathscr U$ then $D=X$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr D'$ such that $D=bigcap {D:Din mathscr D'}$
am I correct?
My next aim is to prove the following Result. This result I have seen in the answer given by Brian M Scott.
A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$ iff
$bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and
- if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.
My attempt for the proof:-
Suppose A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X.$
claim 1:- $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$
$varnothing in mathscr U$. so by the definition of basis there is a subcollection $mathscr X'$: $varnothing=bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X'}$. Hence,$bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing.$
Claim 2:-if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$
if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X implies D_0,D_1in mathscr U implies D_0 cup D_1 in mathscr U implies exists mathscr X'':D_0 cup D_1 =bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X''}. $ If $xnotin D_0 cup D_1 implies exists C'in mathscr X'': x notin C'.$
Conversely suppose family of subsets $mathscr X$ satisfies the following
I. $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and
II. if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.
Claim:-A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$. Let $mathscr
U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$. Our aim is to prove $mathscr U$ is topology of closed sets on $x$.
(a)$Xin mathscr U(because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U$). $emptyset in mathscr U (because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U $ and (I)).
(b)Arbitrary intersection of closed set lie in the $mathscr U$ immediately.
(c)How do I prove the finite union of elements of $mathscr U$ lie in $mathscr U$?
general-topology
general-topology
edited Jan 13 at 17:21
Math geek
asked Jan 13 at 7:21
Math geekMath geek
390110
390110
$begingroup$
I don't understand your definition of $mathscr U$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 13 at 7:52
$begingroup$
Sir, I have corrected the definition of $mathscr U$. Let $mathscr U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 8:14
$begingroup$
I don't know what any of this means (some stuff, yes, but most stuff no), although I just want to say, thatmathscr
font is so pretty. Thank you for using it so I could see. $(+1)$ $color{orange}{bigstar}$ xD
$endgroup$
– user477343
Jan 13 at 11:14
$begingroup$
what do you mean? I don't understand :(
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 11:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't understand your definition of $mathscr U$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 13 at 7:52
$begingroup$
Sir, I have corrected the definition of $mathscr U$. Let $mathscr U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 8:14
$begingroup$
I don't know what any of this means (some stuff, yes, but most stuff no), although I just want to say, thatmathscr
font is so pretty. Thank you for using it so I could see. $(+1)$ $color{orange}{bigstar}$ xD
$endgroup$
– user477343
Jan 13 at 11:14
$begingroup$
what do you mean? I don't understand :(
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 11:16
$begingroup$
I don't understand your definition of $mathscr U$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 13 at 7:52
$begingroup$
I don't understand your definition of $mathscr U$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 13 at 7:52
$begingroup$
Sir, I have corrected the definition of $mathscr U$. Let $mathscr U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 8:14
$begingroup$
Sir, I have corrected the definition of $mathscr U$. Let $mathscr U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 8:14
$begingroup$
I don't know what any of this means (some stuff, yes, but most stuff no), although I just want to say, that
mathscr
font is so pretty. Thank you for using it so I could see. $(+1)$ $color{orange}{bigstar}$ xD$endgroup$
– user477343
Jan 13 at 11:14
$begingroup$
I don't know what any of this means (some stuff, yes, but most stuff no), although I just want to say, that
mathscr
font is so pretty. Thank you for using it so I could see. $(+1)$ $color{orange}{bigstar}$ xD$endgroup$
– user477343
Jan 13 at 11:14
$begingroup$
what do you mean? I don't understand :(
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 11:16
$begingroup$
what do you mean? I don't understand :(
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 11:16
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $mathscr D$ be the basis for closed sets that we are working with.
If $Acup B$, then there is nothing to prove. So let us assume that $Xsetminus (Acup B)neemptyset$.
Then we have $A=bigcap mathscr D'_0$, $B=bigcap mathscr D'_1$ for some $mathscr D'_{0,1}subseteqmathscr D$.
Let us now take the set
$$S={(x,D_0,D_1,D_2); D_2inmathscr D, xin X, xnotin D_2; D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2, D_0inmathscr D'_0, D_1inmathscr D'_1}.$$
We want to show that
$$Acup B=bigcap {D_2; (x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in Stext{ for some }x, D_0, D_1}=:C.$$
Since for every $D_2$ as above we have $D_2supseteq D_0 supseteq A$, we get $Csupseteq A$. By the same reasoning we have $Csupseteq B$ and, consequently, $Csupseteq Acup B$.
It remains to show that $Csubseteq Acup B$. Assume that, on the contrary, there exists $xin C$ such that $xnotin Acup B$. But since $xnotin Acup B$ we have $xnotin D_0$ and $xnotin D_1$ for some $D_0inmathscr D'_0$, $D_1inmathscr D'_1$. Therefore there exists $D_2inmathscr D$ such that $xnotin D_2$ and $D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2$. But then $(x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in S$, and from $xnotin D_2$ we get $xnotin C$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071767%2fis-my-definition-correct-how-do-i-prove-the-finite-union-of-elements-of-maths%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $mathscr D$ be the basis for closed sets that we are working with.
If $Acup B$, then there is nothing to prove. So let us assume that $Xsetminus (Acup B)neemptyset$.
Then we have $A=bigcap mathscr D'_0$, $B=bigcap mathscr D'_1$ for some $mathscr D'_{0,1}subseteqmathscr D$.
Let us now take the set
$$S={(x,D_0,D_1,D_2); D_2inmathscr D, xin X, xnotin D_2; D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2, D_0inmathscr D'_0, D_1inmathscr D'_1}.$$
We want to show that
$$Acup B=bigcap {D_2; (x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in Stext{ for some }x, D_0, D_1}=:C.$$
Since for every $D_2$ as above we have $D_2supseteq D_0 supseteq A$, we get $Csupseteq A$. By the same reasoning we have $Csupseteq B$ and, consequently, $Csupseteq Acup B$.
It remains to show that $Csubseteq Acup B$. Assume that, on the contrary, there exists $xin C$ such that $xnotin Acup B$. But since $xnotin Acup B$ we have $xnotin D_0$ and $xnotin D_1$ for some $D_0inmathscr D'_0$, $D_1inmathscr D'_1$. Therefore there exists $D_2inmathscr D$ such that $xnotin D_2$ and $D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2$. But then $(x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in S$, and from $xnotin D_2$ we get $xnotin C$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mathscr D$ be the basis for closed sets that we are working with.
If $Acup B$, then there is nothing to prove. So let us assume that $Xsetminus (Acup B)neemptyset$.
Then we have $A=bigcap mathscr D'_0$, $B=bigcap mathscr D'_1$ for some $mathscr D'_{0,1}subseteqmathscr D$.
Let us now take the set
$$S={(x,D_0,D_1,D_2); D_2inmathscr D, xin X, xnotin D_2; D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2, D_0inmathscr D'_0, D_1inmathscr D'_1}.$$
We want to show that
$$Acup B=bigcap {D_2; (x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in Stext{ for some }x, D_0, D_1}=:C.$$
Since for every $D_2$ as above we have $D_2supseteq D_0 supseteq A$, we get $Csupseteq A$. By the same reasoning we have $Csupseteq B$ and, consequently, $Csupseteq Acup B$.
It remains to show that $Csubseteq Acup B$. Assume that, on the contrary, there exists $xin C$ such that $xnotin Acup B$. But since $xnotin Acup B$ we have $xnotin D_0$ and $xnotin D_1$ for some $D_0inmathscr D'_0$, $D_1inmathscr D'_1$. Therefore there exists $D_2inmathscr D$ such that $xnotin D_2$ and $D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2$. But then $(x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in S$, and from $xnotin D_2$ we get $xnotin C$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mathscr D$ be the basis for closed sets that we are working with.
If $Acup B$, then there is nothing to prove. So let us assume that $Xsetminus (Acup B)neemptyset$.
Then we have $A=bigcap mathscr D'_0$, $B=bigcap mathscr D'_1$ for some $mathscr D'_{0,1}subseteqmathscr D$.
Let us now take the set
$$S={(x,D_0,D_1,D_2); D_2inmathscr D, xin X, xnotin D_2; D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2, D_0inmathscr D'_0, D_1inmathscr D'_1}.$$
We want to show that
$$Acup B=bigcap {D_2; (x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in Stext{ for some }x, D_0, D_1}=:C.$$
Since for every $D_2$ as above we have $D_2supseteq D_0 supseteq A$, we get $Csupseteq A$. By the same reasoning we have $Csupseteq B$ and, consequently, $Csupseteq Acup B$.
It remains to show that $Csubseteq Acup B$. Assume that, on the contrary, there exists $xin C$ such that $xnotin Acup B$. But since $xnotin Acup B$ we have $xnotin D_0$ and $xnotin D_1$ for some $D_0inmathscr D'_0$, $D_1inmathscr D'_1$. Therefore there exists $D_2inmathscr D$ such that $xnotin D_2$ and $D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2$. But then $(x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in S$, and from $xnotin D_2$ we get $xnotin C$.
$endgroup$
Let $mathscr D$ be the basis for closed sets that we are working with.
If $Acup B$, then there is nothing to prove. So let us assume that $Xsetminus (Acup B)neemptyset$.
Then we have $A=bigcap mathscr D'_0$, $B=bigcap mathscr D'_1$ for some $mathscr D'_{0,1}subseteqmathscr D$.
Let us now take the set
$$S={(x,D_0,D_1,D_2); D_2inmathscr D, xin X, xnotin D_2; D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2, D_0inmathscr D'_0, D_1inmathscr D'_1}.$$
We want to show that
$$Acup B=bigcap {D_2; (x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in Stext{ for some }x, D_0, D_1}=:C.$$
Since for every $D_2$ as above we have $D_2supseteq D_0 supseteq A$, we get $Csupseteq A$. By the same reasoning we have $Csupseteq B$ and, consequently, $Csupseteq Acup B$.
It remains to show that $Csubseteq Acup B$. Assume that, on the contrary, there exists $xin C$ such that $xnotin Acup B$. But since $xnotin Acup B$ we have $xnotin D_0$ and $xnotin D_1$ for some $D_0inmathscr D'_0$, $D_1inmathscr D'_1$. Therefore there exists $D_2inmathscr D$ such that $xnotin D_2$ and $D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2$. But then $(x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in S$, and from $xnotin D_2$ we get $xnotin C$.
edited Jan 13 at 14:42
answered Jan 13 at 14:32
Martin SleziakMartin Sleziak
44.9k10121273
44.9k10121273
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071767%2fis-my-definition-correct-how-do-i-prove-the-finite-union-of-elements-of-maths%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I don't understand your definition of $mathscr U$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 13 at 7:52
$begingroup$
Sir, I have corrected the definition of $mathscr U$. Let $mathscr U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 8:14
$begingroup$
I don't know what any of this means (some stuff, yes, but most stuff no), although I just want to say, that
mathscr
font is so pretty. Thank you for using it so I could see. $(+1)$ $color{orange}{bigstar}$ xD$endgroup$
– user477343
Jan 13 at 11:14
$begingroup$
what do you mean? I don't understand :(
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 11:16