Is my definition correct? How do I prove the finite union of elements of $mathscr U$ lie in $mathscr U$?












2












$begingroup$


Definition of basis for a topology on $X$ given in the Foundation of Topology By Patty given by




Let $(X,mathscr T)$ be a topological space. A basis for $mathscr T$
is a subcollection $mathscr B$ of $mathscr T$ with the property that
if $Uin mathscr T$ then $U=emptyset$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr B'$ such that $U=bigcup {B:Bin mathscr B'}$




How do I write the definition of basis for the family of closed sets?



My attempt:-




Let $(X,mathscr U)$ be a family of closed sets(closed sets of topology on $X$). A basis for $mathscr
U$
is a subcollection $mathscr D$ of $mathscr U$ with the property
that if $Din mathscr U$ then $D=X$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr D'$ such that $D=bigcap {D:Din mathscr D'}$




am I correct?



My next aim is to prove the following Result. This result I have seen in the answer given by Brian M Scott.




A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$ iff





  • $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and

  • if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.




My attempt for the proof:-



Suppose A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X.$



claim 1:- $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$



$varnothing in mathscr U$. so by the definition of basis there is a subcollection $mathscr X'$: $varnothing=bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X'}$. Hence,$bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing.$



Claim 2:-if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$



if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X implies D_0,D_1in mathscr U implies D_0 cup D_1 in mathscr U implies exists mathscr X'':D_0 cup D_1 =bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X''}. $ If $xnotin D_0 cup D_1 implies exists C'in mathscr X'': x notin C'.$



Conversely suppose family of subsets $mathscr X$ satisfies the following



I. $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and



II. if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.



Claim:-A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$
. Let $mathscr
U$
is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$. Our aim is to prove $mathscr U$ is topology of closed sets on $x$.



(a)$Xin mathscr U(because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U$). $emptyset in mathscr U (because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U $ and (I)).



(b)Arbitrary intersection of closed set lie in the $mathscr U$ immediately.



(c)How do I prove the finite union of elements of $mathscr U$ lie in $mathscr U$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't understand your definition of $mathscr U$.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 13 at 7:52










  • $begingroup$
    Sir, I have corrected the definition of $mathscr U$. Let $mathscr U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$
    $endgroup$
    – Math geek
    Jan 13 at 8:14










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know what any of this means (some stuff, yes, but most stuff no), although I just want to say, that mathscr font is so pretty. Thank you for using it so I could see. $(+1)$ $color{orange}{bigstar}$ xD
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    Jan 13 at 11:14












  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean? I don't understand :(
    $endgroup$
    – Math geek
    Jan 13 at 11:16
















2












$begingroup$


Definition of basis for a topology on $X$ given in the Foundation of Topology By Patty given by




Let $(X,mathscr T)$ be a topological space. A basis for $mathscr T$
is a subcollection $mathscr B$ of $mathscr T$ with the property that
if $Uin mathscr T$ then $U=emptyset$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr B'$ such that $U=bigcup {B:Bin mathscr B'}$




How do I write the definition of basis for the family of closed sets?



My attempt:-




Let $(X,mathscr U)$ be a family of closed sets(closed sets of topology on $X$). A basis for $mathscr
U$
is a subcollection $mathscr D$ of $mathscr U$ with the property
that if $Din mathscr U$ then $D=X$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr D'$ such that $D=bigcap {D:Din mathscr D'}$




am I correct?



My next aim is to prove the following Result. This result I have seen in the answer given by Brian M Scott.




A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$ iff





  • $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and

  • if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.




My attempt for the proof:-



Suppose A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X.$



claim 1:- $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$



$varnothing in mathscr U$. so by the definition of basis there is a subcollection $mathscr X'$: $varnothing=bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X'}$. Hence,$bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing.$



Claim 2:-if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$



if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X implies D_0,D_1in mathscr U implies D_0 cup D_1 in mathscr U implies exists mathscr X'':D_0 cup D_1 =bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X''}. $ If $xnotin D_0 cup D_1 implies exists C'in mathscr X'': x notin C'.$



Conversely suppose family of subsets $mathscr X$ satisfies the following



I. $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and



II. if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.



Claim:-A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$
. Let $mathscr
U$
is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$. Our aim is to prove $mathscr U$ is topology of closed sets on $x$.



(a)$Xin mathscr U(because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U$). $emptyset in mathscr U (because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U $ and (I)).



(b)Arbitrary intersection of closed set lie in the $mathscr U$ immediately.



(c)How do I prove the finite union of elements of $mathscr U$ lie in $mathscr U$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't understand your definition of $mathscr U$.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 13 at 7:52










  • $begingroup$
    Sir, I have corrected the definition of $mathscr U$. Let $mathscr U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$
    $endgroup$
    – Math geek
    Jan 13 at 8:14










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know what any of this means (some stuff, yes, but most stuff no), although I just want to say, that mathscr font is so pretty. Thank you for using it so I could see. $(+1)$ $color{orange}{bigstar}$ xD
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    Jan 13 at 11:14












  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean? I don't understand :(
    $endgroup$
    – Math geek
    Jan 13 at 11:16














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


Definition of basis for a topology on $X$ given in the Foundation of Topology By Patty given by




Let $(X,mathscr T)$ be a topological space. A basis for $mathscr T$
is a subcollection $mathscr B$ of $mathscr T$ with the property that
if $Uin mathscr T$ then $U=emptyset$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr B'$ such that $U=bigcup {B:Bin mathscr B'}$




How do I write the definition of basis for the family of closed sets?



My attempt:-




Let $(X,mathscr U)$ be a family of closed sets(closed sets of topology on $X$). A basis for $mathscr
U$
is a subcollection $mathscr D$ of $mathscr U$ with the property
that if $Din mathscr U$ then $D=X$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr D'$ such that $D=bigcap {D:Din mathscr D'}$




am I correct?



My next aim is to prove the following Result. This result I have seen in the answer given by Brian M Scott.




A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$ iff





  • $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and

  • if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.




My attempt for the proof:-



Suppose A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X.$



claim 1:- $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$



$varnothing in mathscr U$. so by the definition of basis there is a subcollection $mathscr X'$: $varnothing=bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X'}$. Hence,$bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing.$



Claim 2:-if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$



if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X implies D_0,D_1in mathscr U implies D_0 cup D_1 in mathscr U implies exists mathscr X'':D_0 cup D_1 =bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X''}. $ If $xnotin D_0 cup D_1 implies exists C'in mathscr X'': x notin C'.$



Conversely suppose family of subsets $mathscr X$ satisfies the following



I. $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and



II. if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.



Claim:-A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$
. Let $mathscr
U$
is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$. Our aim is to prove $mathscr U$ is topology of closed sets on $x$.



(a)$Xin mathscr U(because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U$). $emptyset in mathscr U (because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U $ and (I)).



(b)Arbitrary intersection of closed set lie in the $mathscr U$ immediately.



(c)How do I prove the finite union of elements of $mathscr U$ lie in $mathscr U$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Definition of basis for a topology on $X$ given in the Foundation of Topology By Patty given by




Let $(X,mathscr T)$ be a topological space. A basis for $mathscr T$
is a subcollection $mathscr B$ of $mathscr T$ with the property that
if $Uin mathscr T$ then $U=emptyset$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr B'$ such that $U=bigcup {B:Bin mathscr B'}$




How do I write the definition of basis for the family of closed sets?



My attempt:-




Let $(X,mathscr U)$ be a family of closed sets(closed sets of topology on $X$). A basis for $mathscr
U$
is a subcollection $mathscr D$ of $mathscr U$ with the property
that if $Din mathscr U$ then $D=X$ or there is a subcollection
$mathscr D'$ such that $D=bigcap {D:Din mathscr D'}$




am I correct?



My next aim is to prove the following Result. This result I have seen in the answer given by Brian M Scott.




A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$ iff





  • $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and

  • if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.




My attempt for the proof:-



Suppose A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X.$



claim 1:- $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$



$varnothing in mathscr U$. so by the definition of basis there is a subcollection $mathscr X'$: $varnothing=bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X'}$. Hence,$bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing.$



Claim 2:-if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$



if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X implies D_0,D_1in mathscr U implies D_0 cup D_1 in mathscr U implies exists mathscr X'':D_0 cup D_1 =bigcap {C:Cin mathscr X''}. $ If $xnotin D_0 cup D_1 implies exists C'in mathscr X'': x notin C'.$



Conversely suppose family of subsets $mathscr X$ satisfies the following



I. $bigcap_{Din mathscr X} D=varnothing$, and



II. if $D_0,D_1inmathscr X$ and $xnotin D_0cup D_1$, then there is a $D_2inmathscr X$ such that $xnotin D_2supseteq D_0cup D_1$.



Claim:-A family $mathscr Xsubseteqwp(X)$ is a base for the closed sets
of topology on $X$
. Let $mathscr
U$
is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$. Our aim is to prove $mathscr U$ is topology of closed sets on $x$.



(a)$Xin mathscr U(because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U$). $emptyset in mathscr U (because text{ by the definition of} mathscr U $ and (I)).



(b)Arbitrary intersection of closed set lie in the $mathscr U$ immediately.



(c)How do I prove the finite union of elements of $mathscr U$ lie in $mathscr U$?







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 13 at 17:21







Math geek

















asked Jan 13 at 7:21









Math geekMath geek

390110




390110












  • $begingroup$
    I don't understand your definition of $mathscr U$.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 13 at 7:52










  • $begingroup$
    Sir, I have corrected the definition of $mathscr U$. Let $mathscr U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$
    $endgroup$
    – Math geek
    Jan 13 at 8:14










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know what any of this means (some stuff, yes, but most stuff no), although I just want to say, that mathscr font is so pretty. Thank you for using it so I could see. $(+1)$ $color{orange}{bigstar}$ xD
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    Jan 13 at 11:14












  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean? I don't understand :(
    $endgroup$
    – Math geek
    Jan 13 at 11:16


















  • $begingroup$
    I don't understand your definition of $mathscr U$.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 13 at 7:52










  • $begingroup$
    Sir, I have corrected the definition of $mathscr U$. Let $mathscr U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$
    $endgroup$
    – Math geek
    Jan 13 at 8:14










  • $begingroup$
    I don't know what any of this means (some stuff, yes, but most stuff no), although I just want to say, that mathscr font is so pretty. Thank you for using it so I could see. $(+1)$ $color{orange}{bigstar}$ xD
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    Jan 13 at 11:14












  • $begingroup$
    what do you mean? I don't understand :(
    $endgroup$
    – Math geek
    Jan 13 at 11:16
















$begingroup$
I don't understand your definition of $mathscr U$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 13 at 7:52




$begingroup$
I don't understand your definition of $mathscr U$.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 13 at 7:52












$begingroup$
Sir, I have corrected the definition of $mathscr U$. Let $mathscr U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 8:14




$begingroup$
Sir, I have corrected the definition of $mathscr U$. Let $mathscr U$ is a subcollection of $wp(X)$ consisting of $X$ and those sets are the intersection of members of $mathscr X$
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 8:14












$begingroup$
I don't know what any of this means (some stuff, yes, but most stuff no), although I just want to say, that mathscr font is so pretty. Thank you for using it so I could see. $(+1)$ $color{orange}{bigstar}$ xD
$endgroup$
– user477343
Jan 13 at 11:14






$begingroup$
I don't know what any of this means (some stuff, yes, but most stuff no), although I just want to say, that mathscr font is so pretty. Thank you for using it so I could see. $(+1)$ $color{orange}{bigstar}$ xD
$endgroup$
– user477343
Jan 13 at 11:14














$begingroup$
what do you mean? I don't understand :(
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 11:16




$begingroup$
what do you mean? I don't understand :(
$endgroup$
– Math geek
Jan 13 at 11:16










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Let $mathscr D$ be the basis for closed sets that we are working with.



If $Acup B$, then there is nothing to prove. So let us assume that $Xsetminus (Acup B)neemptyset$.



Then we have $A=bigcap mathscr D'_0$, $B=bigcap mathscr D'_1$ for some $mathscr D'_{0,1}subseteqmathscr D$.



Let us now take the set
$$S={(x,D_0,D_1,D_2); D_2inmathscr D, xin X, xnotin D_2; D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2, D_0inmathscr D'_0, D_1inmathscr D'_1}.$$
We want to show that
$$Acup B=bigcap {D_2; (x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in Stext{ for some }x, D_0, D_1}=:C.$$



Since for every $D_2$ as above we have $D_2supseteq D_0 supseteq A$, we get $Csupseteq A$. By the same reasoning we have $Csupseteq B$ and, consequently, $Csupseteq Acup B$.



It remains to show that $Csubseteq Acup B$. Assume that, on the contrary, there exists $xin C$ such that $xnotin Acup B$. But since $xnotin Acup B$ we have $xnotin D_0$ and $xnotin D_1$ for some $D_0inmathscr D'_0$, $D_1inmathscr D'_1$. Therefore there exists $D_2inmathscr D$ such that $xnotin D_2$ and $D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2$. But then $(x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in S$, and from $xnotin D_2$ we get $xnotin C$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071767%2fis-my-definition-correct-how-do-i-prove-the-finite-union-of-elements-of-maths%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Let $mathscr D$ be the basis for closed sets that we are working with.



    If $Acup B$, then there is nothing to prove. So let us assume that $Xsetminus (Acup B)neemptyset$.



    Then we have $A=bigcap mathscr D'_0$, $B=bigcap mathscr D'_1$ for some $mathscr D'_{0,1}subseteqmathscr D$.



    Let us now take the set
    $$S={(x,D_0,D_1,D_2); D_2inmathscr D, xin X, xnotin D_2; D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2, D_0inmathscr D'_0, D_1inmathscr D'_1}.$$
    We want to show that
    $$Acup B=bigcap {D_2; (x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in Stext{ for some }x, D_0, D_1}=:C.$$



    Since for every $D_2$ as above we have $D_2supseteq D_0 supseteq A$, we get $Csupseteq A$. By the same reasoning we have $Csupseteq B$ and, consequently, $Csupseteq Acup B$.



    It remains to show that $Csubseteq Acup B$. Assume that, on the contrary, there exists $xin C$ such that $xnotin Acup B$. But since $xnotin Acup B$ we have $xnotin D_0$ and $xnotin D_1$ for some $D_0inmathscr D'_0$, $D_1inmathscr D'_1$. Therefore there exists $D_2inmathscr D$ such that $xnotin D_2$ and $D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2$. But then $(x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in S$, and from $xnotin D_2$ we get $xnotin C$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Let $mathscr D$ be the basis for closed sets that we are working with.



      If $Acup B$, then there is nothing to prove. So let us assume that $Xsetminus (Acup B)neemptyset$.



      Then we have $A=bigcap mathscr D'_0$, $B=bigcap mathscr D'_1$ for some $mathscr D'_{0,1}subseteqmathscr D$.



      Let us now take the set
      $$S={(x,D_0,D_1,D_2); D_2inmathscr D, xin X, xnotin D_2; D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2, D_0inmathscr D'_0, D_1inmathscr D'_1}.$$
      We want to show that
      $$Acup B=bigcap {D_2; (x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in Stext{ for some }x, D_0, D_1}=:C.$$



      Since for every $D_2$ as above we have $D_2supseteq D_0 supseteq A$, we get $Csupseteq A$. By the same reasoning we have $Csupseteq B$ and, consequently, $Csupseteq Acup B$.



      It remains to show that $Csubseteq Acup B$. Assume that, on the contrary, there exists $xin C$ such that $xnotin Acup B$. But since $xnotin Acup B$ we have $xnotin D_0$ and $xnotin D_1$ for some $D_0inmathscr D'_0$, $D_1inmathscr D'_1$. Therefore there exists $D_2inmathscr D$ such that $xnotin D_2$ and $D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2$. But then $(x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in S$, and from $xnotin D_2$ we get $xnotin C$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Let $mathscr D$ be the basis for closed sets that we are working with.



        If $Acup B$, then there is nothing to prove. So let us assume that $Xsetminus (Acup B)neemptyset$.



        Then we have $A=bigcap mathscr D'_0$, $B=bigcap mathscr D'_1$ for some $mathscr D'_{0,1}subseteqmathscr D$.



        Let us now take the set
        $$S={(x,D_0,D_1,D_2); D_2inmathscr D, xin X, xnotin D_2; D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2, D_0inmathscr D'_0, D_1inmathscr D'_1}.$$
        We want to show that
        $$Acup B=bigcap {D_2; (x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in Stext{ for some }x, D_0, D_1}=:C.$$



        Since for every $D_2$ as above we have $D_2supseteq D_0 supseteq A$, we get $Csupseteq A$. By the same reasoning we have $Csupseteq B$ and, consequently, $Csupseteq Acup B$.



        It remains to show that $Csubseteq Acup B$. Assume that, on the contrary, there exists $xin C$ such that $xnotin Acup B$. But since $xnotin Acup B$ we have $xnotin D_0$ and $xnotin D_1$ for some $D_0inmathscr D'_0$, $D_1inmathscr D'_1$. Therefore there exists $D_2inmathscr D$ such that $xnotin D_2$ and $D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2$. But then $(x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in S$, and from $xnotin D_2$ we get $xnotin C$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Let $mathscr D$ be the basis for closed sets that we are working with.



        If $Acup B$, then there is nothing to prove. So let us assume that $Xsetminus (Acup B)neemptyset$.



        Then we have $A=bigcap mathscr D'_0$, $B=bigcap mathscr D'_1$ for some $mathscr D'_{0,1}subseteqmathscr D$.



        Let us now take the set
        $$S={(x,D_0,D_1,D_2); D_2inmathscr D, xin X, xnotin D_2; D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2, D_0inmathscr D'_0, D_1inmathscr D'_1}.$$
        We want to show that
        $$Acup B=bigcap {D_2; (x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in Stext{ for some }x, D_0, D_1}=:C.$$



        Since for every $D_2$ as above we have $D_2supseteq D_0 supseteq A$, we get $Csupseteq A$. By the same reasoning we have $Csupseteq B$ and, consequently, $Csupseteq Acup B$.



        It remains to show that $Csubseteq Acup B$. Assume that, on the contrary, there exists $xin C$ such that $xnotin Acup B$. But since $xnotin Acup B$ we have $xnotin D_0$ and $xnotin D_1$ for some $D_0inmathscr D'_0$, $D_1inmathscr D'_1$. Therefore there exists $D_2inmathscr D$ such that $xnotin D_2$ and $D_0cup D_1subseteq D_2$. But then $(x,D_0,D_1,D_2)in S$, and from $xnotin D_2$ we get $xnotin C$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 13 at 14:42

























        answered Jan 13 at 14:32









        Martin SleziakMartin Sleziak

        44.9k10121273




        44.9k10121273






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071767%2fis-my-definition-correct-how-do-i-prove-the-finite-union-of-elements-of-maths%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            張江高科駅