Does this function define a probability function?












3












$begingroup$


Show that for a given random event $A$, the function $R: alpha rightarrow mathbb{R}$ defined as $R (B) = P (A | B)$ does not satisfy the axioms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_axioms



$ alpha $ is the sigma-algebra



This is what I tried:



It is a simple counterexample: I have $A_{i}´s$ that belongs to $ alpha $. If I take the $emptyset$ set. So $R (B) = P (A | B)$ it is not well defined.



I am not sure. Any help? Am I right?



Also, If I define $P(B)>0$ of course my counterexmple doesnt work. How I could proof this?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Show that for a given random event $A$, the function $R: alpha rightarrow mathbb{R}$ defined as $R (B) = P (A | B)$ does not satisfy the axioms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_axioms



    $ alpha $ is the sigma-algebra



    This is what I tried:



    It is a simple counterexample: I have $A_{i}´s$ that belongs to $ alpha $. If I take the $emptyset$ set. So $R (B) = P (A | B)$ it is not well defined.



    I am not sure. Any help? Am I right?



    Also, If I define $P(B)>0$ of course my counterexmple doesnt work. How I could proof this?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Show that for a given random event $A$, the function $R: alpha rightarrow mathbb{R}$ defined as $R (B) = P (A | B)$ does not satisfy the axioms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_axioms



      $ alpha $ is the sigma-algebra



      This is what I tried:



      It is a simple counterexample: I have $A_{i}´s$ that belongs to $ alpha $. If I take the $emptyset$ set. So $R (B) = P (A | B)$ it is not well defined.



      I am not sure. Any help? Am I right?



      Also, If I define $P(B)>0$ of course my counterexmple doesnt work. How I could proof this?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Show that for a given random event $A$, the function $R: alpha rightarrow mathbb{R}$ defined as $R (B) = P (A | B)$ does not satisfy the axioms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_axioms



      $ alpha $ is the sigma-algebra



      This is what I tried:



      It is a simple counterexample: I have $A_{i}´s$ that belongs to $ alpha $. If I take the $emptyset$ set. So $R (B) = P (A | B)$ it is not well defined.



      I am not sure. Any help? Am I right?



      Also, If I define $P(B)>0$ of course my counterexmple doesnt work. How I could proof this?







      probability probability-theory measure-theory probability-distributions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 11 at 23:43









      Bernard

      122k741116




      122k741116










      asked Jan 11 at 23:43









      LauraLaura

      3368




      3368






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          We must have $P(B)>0$ for $P(A|B)$ to be defined (your textbook may vary).




          1. Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.


          2. Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(A | Omega) = frac{P(A)}{P(Omega)} = P(A) ne 1$. There is a problem here if $P(A) ne 1$. Of course there is no problem here if $P(A) = 1$ (even if $A ne Omega$, which is indeed possible).


          3. Axiom 3: $P(A|cup_{text{countable} i} B_i) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A|B_i)$. I think we don't have to check anymore because Axiom 2 is violated, but I think Axiom 3 is violated as well.



          The correct probability function involving conditional probability should be $R(A)=P(A|B)$, I think:




          1. Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.


          2. Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(Omega | B) = frac{P(B)}{P(B)} = 1$. Now, there's no problem here.


          3. Axiom 3: $P(cup_{text{countable} i} A_i | B) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A_I |B)$. I think Axiom 3 is satisfied here. I'll leave it to you.







          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070452%2fdoes-this-function-define-a-probability-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            We must have $P(B)>0$ for $P(A|B)$ to be defined (your textbook may vary).




            1. Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.


            2. Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(A | Omega) = frac{P(A)}{P(Omega)} = P(A) ne 1$. There is a problem here if $P(A) ne 1$. Of course there is no problem here if $P(A) = 1$ (even if $A ne Omega$, which is indeed possible).


            3. Axiom 3: $P(A|cup_{text{countable} i} B_i) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A|B_i)$. I think we don't have to check anymore because Axiom 2 is violated, but I think Axiom 3 is violated as well.



            The correct probability function involving conditional probability should be $R(A)=P(A|B)$, I think:




            1. Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.


            2. Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(Omega | B) = frac{P(B)}{P(B)} = 1$. Now, there's no problem here.


            3. Axiom 3: $P(cup_{text{countable} i} A_i | B) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A_I |B)$. I think Axiom 3 is satisfied here. I'll leave it to you.







            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              We must have $P(B)>0$ for $P(A|B)$ to be defined (your textbook may vary).




              1. Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.


              2. Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(A | Omega) = frac{P(A)}{P(Omega)} = P(A) ne 1$. There is a problem here if $P(A) ne 1$. Of course there is no problem here if $P(A) = 1$ (even if $A ne Omega$, which is indeed possible).


              3. Axiom 3: $P(A|cup_{text{countable} i} B_i) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A|B_i)$. I think we don't have to check anymore because Axiom 2 is violated, but I think Axiom 3 is violated as well.



              The correct probability function involving conditional probability should be $R(A)=P(A|B)$, I think:




              1. Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.


              2. Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(Omega | B) = frac{P(B)}{P(B)} = 1$. Now, there's no problem here.


              3. Axiom 3: $P(cup_{text{countable} i} A_i | B) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A_I |B)$. I think Axiom 3 is satisfied here. I'll leave it to you.







              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                We must have $P(B)>0$ for $P(A|B)$ to be defined (your textbook may vary).




                1. Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.


                2. Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(A | Omega) = frac{P(A)}{P(Omega)} = P(A) ne 1$. There is a problem here if $P(A) ne 1$. Of course there is no problem here if $P(A) = 1$ (even if $A ne Omega$, which is indeed possible).


                3. Axiom 3: $P(A|cup_{text{countable} i} B_i) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A|B_i)$. I think we don't have to check anymore because Axiom 2 is violated, but I think Axiom 3 is violated as well.



                The correct probability function involving conditional probability should be $R(A)=P(A|B)$, I think:




                1. Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.


                2. Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(Omega | B) = frac{P(B)}{P(B)} = 1$. Now, there's no problem here.


                3. Axiom 3: $P(cup_{text{countable} i} A_i | B) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A_I |B)$. I think Axiom 3 is satisfied here. I'll leave it to you.







                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                We must have $P(B)>0$ for $P(A|B)$ to be defined (your textbook may vary).




                1. Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.


                2. Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(A | Omega) = frac{P(A)}{P(Omega)} = P(A) ne 1$. There is a problem here if $P(A) ne 1$. Of course there is no problem here if $P(A) = 1$ (even if $A ne Omega$, which is indeed possible).


                3. Axiom 3: $P(A|cup_{text{countable} i} B_i) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A|B_i)$. I think we don't have to check anymore because Axiom 2 is violated, but I think Axiom 3 is violated as well.



                The correct probability function involving conditional probability should be $R(A)=P(A|B)$, I think:




                1. Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.


                2. Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(Omega | B) = frac{P(B)}{P(B)} = 1$. Now, there's no problem here.


                3. Axiom 3: $P(cup_{text{countable} i} A_i | B) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A_I |B)$. I think Axiom 3 is satisfied here. I'll leave it to you.








                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Feb 28 at 7:24









                MitjacksonMitjackson

                7011




                7011






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070452%2fdoes-this-function-define-a-probability-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Human spaceflight

                    Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                    張江高科駅