Does this function define a probability function?
$begingroup$
Show that for a given random event $A$, the function $R: alpha rightarrow mathbb{R}$ defined as $R (B) = P (A | B)$ does not satisfy the axioms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_axioms
$ alpha $ is the sigma-algebra
This is what I tried:
It is a simple counterexample: I have $A_{i}´s$ that belongs to $ alpha $. If I take the $emptyset$ set. So $R (B) = P (A | B)$ it is not well defined.
I am not sure. Any help? Am I right?
Also, If I define $P(B)>0$ of course my counterexmple doesnt work. How I could proof this?
probability probability-theory measure-theory probability-distributions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that for a given random event $A$, the function $R: alpha rightarrow mathbb{R}$ defined as $R (B) = P (A | B)$ does not satisfy the axioms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_axioms
$ alpha $ is the sigma-algebra
This is what I tried:
It is a simple counterexample: I have $A_{i}´s$ that belongs to $ alpha $. If I take the $emptyset$ set. So $R (B) = P (A | B)$ it is not well defined.
I am not sure. Any help? Am I right?
Also, If I define $P(B)>0$ of course my counterexmple doesnt work. How I could proof this?
probability probability-theory measure-theory probability-distributions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that for a given random event $A$, the function $R: alpha rightarrow mathbb{R}$ defined as $R (B) = P (A | B)$ does not satisfy the axioms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_axioms
$ alpha $ is the sigma-algebra
This is what I tried:
It is a simple counterexample: I have $A_{i}´s$ that belongs to $ alpha $. If I take the $emptyset$ set. So $R (B) = P (A | B)$ it is not well defined.
I am not sure. Any help? Am I right?
Also, If I define $P(B)>0$ of course my counterexmple doesnt work. How I could proof this?
probability probability-theory measure-theory probability-distributions
$endgroup$
Show that for a given random event $A$, the function $R: alpha rightarrow mathbb{R}$ defined as $R (B) = P (A | B)$ does not satisfy the axioms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_axioms
$ alpha $ is the sigma-algebra
This is what I tried:
It is a simple counterexample: I have $A_{i}´s$ that belongs to $ alpha $. If I take the $emptyset$ set. So $R (B) = P (A | B)$ it is not well defined.
I am not sure. Any help? Am I right?
Also, If I define $P(B)>0$ of course my counterexmple doesnt work. How I could proof this?
probability probability-theory measure-theory probability-distributions
probability probability-theory measure-theory probability-distributions
edited Jan 11 at 23:43
Bernard
122k741116
122k741116
asked Jan 11 at 23:43
LauraLaura
3368
3368
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We must have $P(B)>0$ for $P(A|B)$ to be defined (your textbook may vary).
Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.
Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(A | Omega) = frac{P(A)}{P(Omega)} = P(A) ne 1$. There is a problem here if $P(A) ne 1$. Of course there is no problem here if $P(A) = 1$ (even if $A ne Omega$, which is indeed possible).
Axiom 3: $P(A|cup_{text{countable} i} B_i) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A|B_i)$. I think we don't have to check anymore because Axiom 2 is violated, but I think Axiom 3 is violated as well.
The correct probability function involving conditional probability should be $R(A)=P(A|B)$, I think:
Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.
Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(Omega | B) = frac{P(B)}{P(B)} = 1$. Now, there's no problem here.
Axiom 3: $P(cup_{text{countable} i} A_i | B) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A_I |B)$. I think Axiom 3 is satisfied here. I'll leave it to you.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070452%2fdoes-this-function-define-a-probability-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We must have $P(B)>0$ for $P(A|B)$ to be defined (your textbook may vary).
Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.
Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(A | Omega) = frac{P(A)}{P(Omega)} = P(A) ne 1$. There is a problem here if $P(A) ne 1$. Of course there is no problem here if $P(A) = 1$ (even if $A ne Omega$, which is indeed possible).
Axiom 3: $P(A|cup_{text{countable} i} B_i) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A|B_i)$. I think we don't have to check anymore because Axiom 2 is violated, but I think Axiom 3 is violated as well.
The correct probability function involving conditional probability should be $R(A)=P(A|B)$, I think:
Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.
Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(Omega | B) = frac{P(B)}{P(B)} = 1$. Now, there's no problem here.
Axiom 3: $P(cup_{text{countable} i} A_i | B) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A_I |B)$. I think Axiom 3 is satisfied here. I'll leave it to you.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We must have $P(B)>0$ for $P(A|B)$ to be defined (your textbook may vary).
Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.
Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(A | Omega) = frac{P(A)}{P(Omega)} = P(A) ne 1$. There is a problem here if $P(A) ne 1$. Of course there is no problem here if $P(A) = 1$ (even if $A ne Omega$, which is indeed possible).
Axiom 3: $P(A|cup_{text{countable} i} B_i) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A|B_i)$. I think we don't have to check anymore because Axiom 2 is violated, but I think Axiom 3 is violated as well.
The correct probability function involving conditional probability should be $R(A)=P(A|B)$, I think:
Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.
Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(Omega | B) = frac{P(B)}{P(B)} = 1$. Now, there's no problem here.
Axiom 3: $P(cup_{text{countable} i} A_i | B) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A_I |B)$. I think Axiom 3 is satisfied here. I'll leave it to you.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We must have $P(B)>0$ for $P(A|B)$ to be defined (your textbook may vary).
Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.
Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(A | Omega) = frac{P(A)}{P(Omega)} = P(A) ne 1$. There is a problem here if $P(A) ne 1$. Of course there is no problem here if $P(A) = 1$ (even if $A ne Omega$, which is indeed possible).
Axiom 3: $P(A|cup_{text{countable} i} B_i) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A|B_i)$. I think we don't have to check anymore because Axiom 2 is violated, but I think Axiom 3 is violated as well.
The correct probability function involving conditional probability should be $R(A)=P(A|B)$, I think:
Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.
Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(Omega | B) = frac{P(B)}{P(B)} = 1$. Now, there's no problem here.
Axiom 3: $P(cup_{text{countable} i} A_i | B) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A_I |B)$. I think Axiom 3 is satisfied here. I'll leave it to you.
$endgroup$
We must have $P(B)>0$ for $P(A|B)$ to be defined (your textbook may vary).
Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.
Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(A | Omega) = frac{P(A)}{P(Omega)} = P(A) ne 1$. There is a problem here if $P(A) ne 1$. Of course there is no problem here if $P(A) = 1$ (even if $A ne Omega$, which is indeed possible).
Axiom 3: $P(A|cup_{text{countable} i} B_i) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A|B_i)$. I think we don't have to check anymore because Axiom 2 is violated, but I think Axiom 3 is violated as well.
The correct probability function involving conditional probability should be $R(A)=P(A|B)$, I think:
Axiom 1: $P(A|B) := frac{P(A cap B)}{P(B)} ge 0$. There's no problem here.
Axiom 2: $P(Omega) = P(Omega | B) = frac{P(B)}{P(B)} = 1$. Now, there's no problem here.
Axiom 3: $P(cup_{text{countable} i} A_i | B) = sum_{text{countable} i} P(A_I |B)$. I think Axiom 3 is satisfied here. I'll leave it to you.
answered Feb 28 at 7:24
MitjacksonMitjackson
7011
7011
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070452%2fdoes-this-function-define-a-probability-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown