Prove Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator is bounded












0












$begingroup$


I'm having some issues understanding a proof that a Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator is bounded. I'll start off by giving the definitions I'm working with.



Definition of integral operator:



$textit{Let k be a function of two variables (x,t)}in Itimes I=I^2textit{ where I is a finite or infinite real interval. We define a linear integral operator K with kernel k(x,y) as}$



$$Ku(x)=int_{I}k(x,y)u(y) dy, xin I$$



Definition of Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator:



$textit{An integral operator on }L^{2}(I)textit{ is called a Hilbert-Schmidt operator if the kernel k is in }L^2(Itimes I)textit{,}$
$textit{that is if}$



$$||k||^2=int_{I}int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dxdy<infty$$



The book now proceeds to show that a Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator is bounded with $||K||leq||k||$. In the proof the following is stated:



$textit{Assume that K is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator with kernel k}in L^2(Itimes I). textit{Let u}in L^2(I),$
$textit{then from Fubini's theorem in measure theory, the function }xmapsto int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$
$textit{is in }L^1(I)textit{ such that }int_{I} was int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dxdy<infty.textit{ Thus it is allowed to use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality such that}$



$$|Ku(x)|=|int_{I}k(x,y)u(y) dy|leq ||k(x,cdot)|| ||u||$$



$textit{since }||overline{u}||=||u||.$



I' having some difficulties understanding this argument. The remaining part of the proof is not that difficult once this argument is clear. Can anyone give some hints as to why this makes sense?



Thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I'm having some issues understanding a proof that a Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator is bounded. I'll start off by giving the definitions I'm working with.



    Definition of integral operator:



    $textit{Let k be a function of two variables (x,t)}in Itimes I=I^2textit{ where I is a finite or infinite real interval. We define a linear integral operator K with kernel k(x,y) as}$



    $$Ku(x)=int_{I}k(x,y)u(y) dy, xin I$$



    Definition of Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator:



    $textit{An integral operator on }L^{2}(I)textit{ is called a Hilbert-Schmidt operator if the kernel k is in }L^2(Itimes I)textit{,}$
    $textit{that is if}$



    $$||k||^2=int_{I}int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dxdy<infty$$



    The book now proceeds to show that a Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator is bounded with $||K||leq||k||$. In the proof the following is stated:



    $textit{Assume that K is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator with kernel k}in L^2(Itimes I). textit{Let u}in L^2(I),$
    $textit{then from Fubini's theorem in measure theory, the function }xmapsto int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$
    $textit{is in }L^1(I)textit{ such that }int_{I} was int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dxdy<infty.textit{ Thus it is allowed to use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality such that}$



    $$|Ku(x)|=|int_{I}k(x,y)u(y) dy|leq ||k(x,cdot)|| ||u||$$



    $textit{since }||overline{u}||=||u||.$



    I' having some difficulties understanding this argument. The remaining part of the proof is not that difficult once this argument is clear. Can anyone give some hints as to why this makes sense?



    Thanks in advance!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I'm having some issues understanding a proof that a Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator is bounded. I'll start off by giving the definitions I'm working with.



      Definition of integral operator:



      $textit{Let k be a function of two variables (x,t)}in Itimes I=I^2textit{ where I is a finite or infinite real interval. We define a linear integral operator K with kernel k(x,y) as}$



      $$Ku(x)=int_{I}k(x,y)u(y) dy, xin I$$



      Definition of Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator:



      $textit{An integral operator on }L^{2}(I)textit{ is called a Hilbert-Schmidt operator if the kernel k is in }L^2(Itimes I)textit{,}$
      $textit{that is if}$



      $$||k||^2=int_{I}int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dxdy<infty$$



      The book now proceeds to show that a Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator is bounded with $||K||leq||k||$. In the proof the following is stated:



      $textit{Assume that K is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator with kernel k}in L^2(Itimes I). textit{Let u}in L^2(I),$
      $textit{then from Fubini's theorem in measure theory, the function }xmapsto int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$
      $textit{is in }L^1(I)textit{ such that }int_{I} was int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dxdy<infty.textit{ Thus it is allowed to use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality such that}$



      $$|Ku(x)|=|int_{I}k(x,y)u(y) dy|leq ||k(x,cdot)|| ||u||$$



      $textit{since }||overline{u}||=||u||.$



      I' having some difficulties understanding this argument. The remaining part of the proof is not that difficult once this argument is clear. Can anyone give some hints as to why this makes sense?



      Thanks in advance!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm having some issues understanding a proof that a Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator is bounded. I'll start off by giving the definitions I'm working with.



      Definition of integral operator:



      $textit{Let k be a function of two variables (x,t)}in Itimes I=I^2textit{ where I is a finite or infinite real interval. We define a linear integral operator K with kernel k(x,y) as}$



      $$Ku(x)=int_{I}k(x,y)u(y) dy, xin I$$



      Definition of Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator:



      $textit{An integral operator on }L^{2}(I)textit{ is called a Hilbert-Schmidt operator if the kernel k is in }L^2(Itimes I)textit{,}$
      $textit{that is if}$



      $$||k||^2=int_{I}int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dxdy<infty$$



      The book now proceeds to show that a Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator is bounded with $||K||leq||k||$. In the proof the following is stated:



      $textit{Assume that K is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator with kernel k}in L^2(Itimes I). textit{Let u}in L^2(I),$
      $textit{then from Fubini's theorem in measure theory, the function }xmapsto int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$
      $textit{is in }L^1(I)textit{ such that }int_{I} was int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dxdy<infty.textit{ Thus it is allowed to use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality such that}$



      $$|Ku(x)|=|int_{I}k(x,y)u(y) dy|leq ||k(x,cdot)|| ||u||$$



      $textit{since }||overline{u}||=||u||.$



      I' having some difficulties understanding this argument. The remaining part of the proof is not that difficult once this argument is clear. Can anyone give some hints as to why this makes sense?



      Thanks in advance!







      real-analysis functional-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 16 at 15:08









      JamesJames

      11910




      11910






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          You don't say what exactly are your difficulties, so I will proceed step by ste. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequalitybegin{align}
          |Ku(x)|&=Bigl|int_{I}k(x,y),u(y),dyBigr|\
          &leint_{I}|k(x,y)|,|u(y)|,dy\
          &leBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)^{1/2}Bigl(int_{I}|u(y)|,dyBigr)^{1/2}\
          &=Bigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)^{1/2}|u|.
          end{align}

          Then
          $$
          |Ku(x)|^2leBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)|u|^2
          $$

          and
          $$
          |Ku|^2=int_I|Ku(x)|^2dxleBigl(int_IBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)dxBigr)|u|^2=|k|^2|u|^2,
          $$

          that is,
          $$|Ku|le|k|,|u|.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I have gotten the same steps. My main problem is the argument of why $int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$ makes sense. We know $k(x,y)in L^2(Itimes I)$, but how can we know $int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$ is finite?
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 16 at 16:38










          • $begingroup$
            You do not care. It may be infinite for some $x$, but Fubini guarantees that it is finite a.e. and integrable as a function of $x$. Moreover, since we are dealing with positive functions, Fubini applies, even if the integral were infinite.
            $endgroup$
            – Julián Aguirre
            Jan 16 at 16:41










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for the help! Why does Fubini's theorem apply even if the integral is infinite?
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 16 at 16:56










          • $begingroup$
            In that case you get an equality $infty=infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – Julián Aguirre
            Jan 16 at 22:42












          • $begingroup$
            Oh yeah, of course. Thanks for the help, it makes much more sense now!
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 17 at 13:45












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075842%2fprove-hilbert-schmidt-integral-operator-is-bounded%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          You don't say what exactly are your difficulties, so I will proceed step by ste. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequalitybegin{align}
          |Ku(x)|&=Bigl|int_{I}k(x,y),u(y),dyBigr|\
          &leint_{I}|k(x,y)|,|u(y)|,dy\
          &leBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)^{1/2}Bigl(int_{I}|u(y)|,dyBigr)^{1/2}\
          &=Bigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)^{1/2}|u|.
          end{align}

          Then
          $$
          |Ku(x)|^2leBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)|u|^2
          $$

          and
          $$
          |Ku|^2=int_I|Ku(x)|^2dxleBigl(int_IBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)dxBigr)|u|^2=|k|^2|u|^2,
          $$

          that is,
          $$|Ku|le|k|,|u|.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I have gotten the same steps. My main problem is the argument of why $int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$ makes sense. We know $k(x,y)in L^2(Itimes I)$, but how can we know $int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$ is finite?
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 16 at 16:38










          • $begingroup$
            You do not care. It may be infinite for some $x$, but Fubini guarantees that it is finite a.e. and integrable as a function of $x$. Moreover, since we are dealing with positive functions, Fubini applies, even if the integral were infinite.
            $endgroup$
            – Julián Aguirre
            Jan 16 at 16:41










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for the help! Why does Fubini's theorem apply even if the integral is infinite?
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 16 at 16:56










          • $begingroup$
            In that case you get an equality $infty=infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – Julián Aguirre
            Jan 16 at 22:42












          • $begingroup$
            Oh yeah, of course. Thanks for the help, it makes much more sense now!
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 17 at 13:45
















          1












          $begingroup$

          You don't say what exactly are your difficulties, so I will proceed step by ste. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequalitybegin{align}
          |Ku(x)|&=Bigl|int_{I}k(x,y),u(y),dyBigr|\
          &leint_{I}|k(x,y)|,|u(y)|,dy\
          &leBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)^{1/2}Bigl(int_{I}|u(y)|,dyBigr)^{1/2}\
          &=Bigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)^{1/2}|u|.
          end{align}

          Then
          $$
          |Ku(x)|^2leBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)|u|^2
          $$

          and
          $$
          |Ku|^2=int_I|Ku(x)|^2dxleBigl(int_IBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)dxBigr)|u|^2=|k|^2|u|^2,
          $$

          that is,
          $$|Ku|le|k|,|u|.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I have gotten the same steps. My main problem is the argument of why $int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$ makes sense. We know $k(x,y)in L^2(Itimes I)$, but how can we know $int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$ is finite?
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 16 at 16:38










          • $begingroup$
            You do not care. It may be infinite for some $x$, but Fubini guarantees that it is finite a.e. and integrable as a function of $x$. Moreover, since we are dealing with positive functions, Fubini applies, even if the integral were infinite.
            $endgroup$
            – Julián Aguirre
            Jan 16 at 16:41










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for the help! Why does Fubini's theorem apply even if the integral is infinite?
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 16 at 16:56










          • $begingroup$
            In that case you get an equality $infty=infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – Julián Aguirre
            Jan 16 at 22:42












          • $begingroup$
            Oh yeah, of course. Thanks for the help, it makes much more sense now!
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 17 at 13:45














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          You don't say what exactly are your difficulties, so I will proceed step by ste. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequalitybegin{align}
          |Ku(x)|&=Bigl|int_{I}k(x,y),u(y),dyBigr|\
          &leint_{I}|k(x,y)|,|u(y)|,dy\
          &leBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)^{1/2}Bigl(int_{I}|u(y)|,dyBigr)^{1/2}\
          &=Bigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)^{1/2}|u|.
          end{align}

          Then
          $$
          |Ku(x)|^2leBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)|u|^2
          $$

          and
          $$
          |Ku|^2=int_I|Ku(x)|^2dxleBigl(int_IBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)dxBigr)|u|^2=|k|^2|u|^2,
          $$

          that is,
          $$|Ku|le|k|,|u|.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          You don't say what exactly are your difficulties, so I will proceed step by ste. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequalitybegin{align}
          |Ku(x)|&=Bigl|int_{I}k(x,y),u(y),dyBigr|\
          &leint_{I}|k(x,y)|,|u(y)|,dy\
          &leBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)^{1/2}Bigl(int_{I}|u(y)|,dyBigr)^{1/2}\
          &=Bigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)^{1/2}|u|.
          end{align}

          Then
          $$
          |Ku(x)|^2leBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)|u|^2
          $$

          and
          $$
          |Ku|^2=int_I|Ku(x)|^2dxleBigl(int_IBigl(int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2,dyBigr)dxBigr)|u|^2=|k|^2|u|^2,
          $$

          that is,
          $$|Ku|le|k|,|u|.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 16 at 16:30









          Julián AguirreJulián Aguirre

          69.5k24297




          69.5k24297












          • $begingroup$
            I have gotten the same steps. My main problem is the argument of why $int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$ makes sense. We know $k(x,y)in L^2(Itimes I)$, but how can we know $int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$ is finite?
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 16 at 16:38










          • $begingroup$
            You do not care. It may be infinite for some $x$, but Fubini guarantees that it is finite a.e. and integrable as a function of $x$. Moreover, since we are dealing with positive functions, Fubini applies, even if the integral were infinite.
            $endgroup$
            – Julián Aguirre
            Jan 16 at 16:41










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for the help! Why does Fubini's theorem apply even if the integral is infinite?
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 16 at 16:56










          • $begingroup$
            In that case you get an equality $infty=infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – Julián Aguirre
            Jan 16 at 22:42












          • $begingroup$
            Oh yeah, of course. Thanks for the help, it makes much more sense now!
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 17 at 13:45


















          • $begingroup$
            I have gotten the same steps. My main problem is the argument of why $int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$ makes sense. We know $k(x,y)in L^2(Itimes I)$, but how can we know $int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$ is finite?
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 16 at 16:38










          • $begingroup$
            You do not care. It may be infinite for some $x$, but Fubini guarantees that it is finite a.e. and integrable as a function of $x$. Moreover, since we are dealing with positive functions, Fubini applies, even if the integral were infinite.
            $endgroup$
            – Julián Aguirre
            Jan 16 at 16:41










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for the help! Why does Fubini's theorem apply even if the integral is infinite?
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 16 at 16:56










          • $begingroup$
            In that case you get an equality $infty=infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – Julián Aguirre
            Jan 16 at 22:42












          • $begingroup$
            Oh yeah, of course. Thanks for the help, it makes much more sense now!
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Jan 17 at 13:45
















          $begingroup$
          I have gotten the same steps. My main problem is the argument of why $int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$ makes sense. We know $k(x,y)in L^2(Itimes I)$, but how can we know $int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$ is finite?
          $endgroup$
          – James
          Jan 16 at 16:38




          $begingroup$
          I have gotten the same steps. My main problem is the argument of why $int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$ makes sense. We know $k(x,y)in L^2(Itimes I)$, but how can we know $int_{I}|k(x,y)|^2 dy$ is finite?
          $endgroup$
          – James
          Jan 16 at 16:38












          $begingroup$
          You do not care. It may be infinite for some $x$, but Fubini guarantees that it is finite a.e. and integrable as a function of $x$. Moreover, since we are dealing with positive functions, Fubini applies, even if the integral were infinite.
          $endgroup$
          – Julián Aguirre
          Jan 16 at 16:41




          $begingroup$
          You do not care. It may be infinite for some $x$, but Fubini guarantees that it is finite a.e. and integrable as a function of $x$. Moreover, since we are dealing with positive functions, Fubini applies, even if the integral were infinite.
          $endgroup$
          – Julián Aguirre
          Jan 16 at 16:41












          $begingroup$
          Thank you for the help! Why does Fubini's theorem apply even if the integral is infinite?
          $endgroup$
          – James
          Jan 16 at 16:56




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for the help! Why does Fubini's theorem apply even if the integral is infinite?
          $endgroup$
          – James
          Jan 16 at 16:56












          $begingroup$
          In that case you get an equality $infty=infty$.
          $endgroup$
          – Julián Aguirre
          Jan 16 at 22:42






          $begingroup$
          In that case you get an equality $infty=infty$.
          $endgroup$
          – Julián Aguirre
          Jan 16 at 22:42














          $begingroup$
          Oh yeah, of course. Thanks for the help, it makes much more sense now!
          $endgroup$
          – James
          Jan 17 at 13:45




          $begingroup$
          Oh yeah, of course. Thanks for the help, it makes much more sense now!
          $endgroup$
          – James
          Jan 17 at 13:45


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075842%2fprove-hilbert-schmidt-integral-operator-is-bounded%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Human spaceflight

          Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

          張江高科駅