Does there always exist a continuous map saturating a given open set?
$begingroup$
Let $X$ and $Y$ be two general topological spaces. Is the following statement true?
For any open $Usubset X$, there exists an open $Vsubset Y$ and a continuous map $f:Xrightarrow Y$, such that $f^{-1}V=U$.
general-topology continuity
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ and $Y$ be two general topological spaces. Is the following statement true?
For any open $Usubset X$, there exists an open $Vsubset Y$ and a continuous map $f:Xrightarrow Y$, such that $f^{-1}V=U$.
general-topology continuity
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Take $Y$ to be finite, and $X$ to have an infinite number of open sets.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 16 at 14:57
$begingroup$
But there are potentially many $f$'s?
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 14:59
$begingroup$
You are correct, sloppy thinking on my part.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 16 at 15:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ and $Y$ be two general topological spaces. Is the following statement true?
For any open $Usubset X$, there exists an open $Vsubset Y$ and a continuous map $f:Xrightarrow Y$, such that $f^{-1}V=U$.
general-topology continuity
$endgroup$
Let $X$ and $Y$ be two general topological spaces. Is the following statement true?
For any open $Usubset X$, there exists an open $Vsubset Y$ and a continuous map $f:Xrightarrow Y$, such that $f^{-1}V=U$.
general-topology continuity
general-topology continuity
asked Jan 16 at 14:53
UchihaUchiha
12211
12211
$begingroup$
Take $Y$ to be finite, and $X$ to have an infinite number of open sets.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 16 at 14:57
$begingroup$
But there are potentially many $f$'s?
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 14:59
$begingroup$
You are correct, sloppy thinking on my part.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 16 at 15:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take $Y$ to be finite, and $X$ to have an infinite number of open sets.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 16 at 14:57
$begingroup$
But there are potentially many $f$'s?
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 14:59
$begingroup$
You are correct, sloppy thinking on my part.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 16 at 15:00
$begingroup$
Take $Y$ to be finite, and $X$ to have an infinite number of open sets.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 16 at 14:57
$begingroup$
Take $Y$ to be finite, and $X$ to have an infinite number of open sets.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 16 at 14:57
$begingroup$
But there are potentially many $f$'s?
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 14:59
$begingroup$
But there are potentially many $f$'s?
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 14:59
$begingroup$
You are correct, sloppy thinking on my part.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 16 at 15:00
$begingroup$
You are correct, sloppy thinking on my part.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 16 at 15:00
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $Y$ only has one element then $f^{-1}(V)in{varnothing,X}$ for any open set $V$.
So if $X$ has a non-trivial open set then it does not work.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why is $f^{-1}(V)={emptyset,X}$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 16 at 15:03
2
$begingroup$
@SmileyCraft (typo, repaired) Because $V=varnothing$ or $V=Y={y}$ and $f:Xto Y$ can only be the constant function.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 16 at 15:05
$begingroup$
Right. I did not consider this degenerate situation. Can one say anything about the case where $Y$ has more than one element?
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 15:08
$begingroup$
Here is another degenerate situation: let $Y$ have indiscrete topology. Then again $f^{-1}(V)in{varnothing,X}$ for every open $V$, and $Y$ can have as much elements as you want.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 16 at 15:14
$begingroup$
Right, it seems the question is only interesting if more regularity is assumed on the topology of Y.
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 15:25
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075829%2fdoes-there-always-exist-a-continuous-map-saturating-a-given-open-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $Y$ only has one element then $f^{-1}(V)in{varnothing,X}$ for any open set $V$.
So if $X$ has a non-trivial open set then it does not work.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why is $f^{-1}(V)={emptyset,X}$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 16 at 15:03
2
$begingroup$
@SmileyCraft (typo, repaired) Because $V=varnothing$ or $V=Y={y}$ and $f:Xto Y$ can only be the constant function.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 16 at 15:05
$begingroup$
Right. I did not consider this degenerate situation. Can one say anything about the case where $Y$ has more than one element?
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 15:08
$begingroup$
Here is another degenerate situation: let $Y$ have indiscrete topology. Then again $f^{-1}(V)in{varnothing,X}$ for every open $V$, and $Y$ can have as much elements as you want.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 16 at 15:14
$begingroup$
Right, it seems the question is only interesting if more regularity is assumed on the topology of Y.
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 15:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $Y$ only has one element then $f^{-1}(V)in{varnothing,X}$ for any open set $V$.
So if $X$ has a non-trivial open set then it does not work.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why is $f^{-1}(V)={emptyset,X}$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 16 at 15:03
2
$begingroup$
@SmileyCraft (typo, repaired) Because $V=varnothing$ or $V=Y={y}$ and $f:Xto Y$ can only be the constant function.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 16 at 15:05
$begingroup$
Right. I did not consider this degenerate situation. Can one say anything about the case where $Y$ has more than one element?
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 15:08
$begingroup$
Here is another degenerate situation: let $Y$ have indiscrete topology. Then again $f^{-1}(V)in{varnothing,X}$ for every open $V$, and $Y$ can have as much elements as you want.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 16 at 15:14
$begingroup$
Right, it seems the question is only interesting if more regularity is assumed on the topology of Y.
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 15:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $Y$ only has one element then $f^{-1}(V)in{varnothing,X}$ for any open set $V$.
So if $X$ has a non-trivial open set then it does not work.
$endgroup$
If $Y$ only has one element then $f^{-1}(V)in{varnothing,X}$ for any open set $V$.
So if $X$ has a non-trivial open set then it does not work.
edited Jan 16 at 15:05
answered Jan 16 at 15:02
drhabdrhab
104k545136
104k545136
$begingroup$
Why is $f^{-1}(V)={emptyset,X}$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 16 at 15:03
2
$begingroup$
@SmileyCraft (typo, repaired) Because $V=varnothing$ or $V=Y={y}$ and $f:Xto Y$ can only be the constant function.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 16 at 15:05
$begingroup$
Right. I did not consider this degenerate situation. Can one say anything about the case where $Y$ has more than one element?
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 15:08
$begingroup$
Here is another degenerate situation: let $Y$ have indiscrete topology. Then again $f^{-1}(V)in{varnothing,X}$ for every open $V$, and $Y$ can have as much elements as you want.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 16 at 15:14
$begingroup$
Right, it seems the question is only interesting if more regularity is assumed on the topology of Y.
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 15:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why is $f^{-1}(V)={emptyset,X}$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 16 at 15:03
2
$begingroup$
@SmileyCraft (typo, repaired) Because $V=varnothing$ or $V=Y={y}$ and $f:Xto Y$ can only be the constant function.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 16 at 15:05
$begingroup$
Right. I did not consider this degenerate situation. Can one say anything about the case where $Y$ has more than one element?
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 15:08
$begingroup$
Here is another degenerate situation: let $Y$ have indiscrete topology. Then again $f^{-1}(V)in{varnothing,X}$ for every open $V$, and $Y$ can have as much elements as you want.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 16 at 15:14
$begingroup$
Right, it seems the question is only interesting if more regularity is assumed on the topology of Y.
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 15:25
$begingroup$
Why is $f^{-1}(V)={emptyset,X}$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 16 at 15:03
$begingroup$
Why is $f^{-1}(V)={emptyset,X}$?
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Jan 16 at 15:03
2
2
$begingroup$
@SmileyCraft (typo, repaired) Because $V=varnothing$ or $V=Y={y}$ and $f:Xto Y$ can only be the constant function.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 16 at 15:05
$begingroup$
@SmileyCraft (typo, repaired) Because $V=varnothing$ or $V=Y={y}$ and $f:Xto Y$ can only be the constant function.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 16 at 15:05
$begingroup$
Right. I did not consider this degenerate situation. Can one say anything about the case where $Y$ has more than one element?
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 15:08
$begingroup$
Right. I did not consider this degenerate situation. Can one say anything about the case where $Y$ has more than one element?
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 15:08
$begingroup$
Here is another degenerate situation: let $Y$ have indiscrete topology. Then again $f^{-1}(V)in{varnothing,X}$ for every open $V$, and $Y$ can have as much elements as you want.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 16 at 15:14
$begingroup$
Here is another degenerate situation: let $Y$ have indiscrete topology. Then again $f^{-1}(V)in{varnothing,X}$ for every open $V$, and $Y$ can have as much elements as you want.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Jan 16 at 15:14
$begingroup$
Right, it seems the question is only interesting if more regularity is assumed on the topology of Y.
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 15:25
$begingroup$
Right, it seems the question is only interesting if more regularity is assumed on the topology of Y.
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 15:25
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075829%2fdoes-there-always-exist-a-continuous-map-saturating-a-given-open-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Take $Y$ to be finite, and $X$ to have an infinite number of open sets.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 16 at 14:57
$begingroup$
But there are potentially many $f$'s?
$endgroup$
– Uchiha
Jan 16 at 14:59
$begingroup$
You are correct, sloppy thinking on my part.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 16 at 15:00