Confused about the meter and rhythm of Ulysses by Tennyson












4















Ulysses is written in iambic pentameter. There are a few spondees and trochees thrown in for good measure, but I'm confused in some places, like here:




I cannot rest from travel: I will drink

Life to the lees: All times I have enjoy'd

Greatly, have suffer'd greatly, both with those

That loved me, and alone, on shore, and when

Thro' scudding drifts the rainy Hyades

Vext the dim sea: I am become a name




In the second line, there's a trochee (Life to), but then it continues on normally. Ok. Fine. The line after that does the exact same thing (Greatly). What goes on in the fourth and sixth (last) lines, though?




That loved me, and alone, on shore, and when




The first pair (that loved) is an iambic foot, the second (me, and) is what? A trochee? The third (alone) is, finally, an iamb. The rest are iambs.



What goes on in Tennyson's head when he creates such a weird structure? How does he decide to break the rules, and where? Also, is it correct to think in pairs when breaking down a poem like this?



Similarly, the last line is also funky:




Vext the dim sea: I am become a name




Vext the: trochee.



Dim sea: spondee?



There's also a line at the end of the poem that has 11 syllables, but I guess he just thought "shit, this sounds so good I just have to leave it in" because it's the best line in the entire thing. But I'm guessing that's not the usual thought process going on?










share|improve this question

























  • I cannot hope to give any kind of reasoned answer, but I always read Ulysses as if it were blank verse. It is one of my favourite poems. Does the technical construction matter?

    – Mick
    Feb 9 at 13:54








  • 2





    Substituting trochees for iambs in iambic pentameter (preferably no more than one a line, and not in the last foot) is a thing that goes back to Shakespeare, and probably earlier. See my answer here. Tennyson is not breaking the rules; he is bending them in a way that had been allowed for over 200 years.

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 9 at 13:55













  • @PeterShor Yes, which is why I'm not confused about that part.

    – Yeats
    Feb 9 at 14:08






  • 1





    @Mick It's probably my favorite poem as well. I'm working on a little variation of it myself, which is why I have started to dig around in it to see how it's constructed.

    – Yeats
    Feb 9 at 14:09











  • @Yeats: what part are you confused about then? I only see spondaic and trochaic substitutions here. (I'd say dim sea and All times are spondees, and that me and is an iamb, but scansion is to some extent subjective.)

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 9 at 14:31
















4















Ulysses is written in iambic pentameter. There are a few spondees and trochees thrown in for good measure, but I'm confused in some places, like here:




I cannot rest from travel: I will drink

Life to the lees: All times I have enjoy'd

Greatly, have suffer'd greatly, both with those

That loved me, and alone, on shore, and when

Thro' scudding drifts the rainy Hyades

Vext the dim sea: I am become a name




In the second line, there's a trochee (Life to), but then it continues on normally. Ok. Fine. The line after that does the exact same thing (Greatly). What goes on in the fourth and sixth (last) lines, though?




That loved me, and alone, on shore, and when




The first pair (that loved) is an iambic foot, the second (me, and) is what? A trochee? The third (alone) is, finally, an iamb. The rest are iambs.



What goes on in Tennyson's head when he creates such a weird structure? How does he decide to break the rules, and where? Also, is it correct to think in pairs when breaking down a poem like this?



Similarly, the last line is also funky:




Vext the dim sea: I am become a name




Vext the: trochee.



Dim sea: spondee?



There's also a line at the end of the poem that has 11 syllables, but I guess he just thought "shit, this sounds so good I just have to leave it in" because it's the best line in the entire thing. But I'm guessing that's not the usual thought process going on?










share|improve this question

























  • I cannot hope to give any kind of reasoned answer, but I always read Ulysses as if it were blank verse. It is one of my favourite poems. Does the technical construction matter?

    – Mick
    Feb 9 at 13:54








  • 2





    Substituting trochees for iambs in iambic pentameter (preferably no more than one a line, and not in the last foot) is a thing that goes back to Shakespeare, and probably earlier. See my answer here. Tennyson is not breaking the rules; he is bending them in a way that had been allowed for over 200 years.

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 9 at 13:55













  • @PeterShor Yes, which is why I'm not confused about that part.

    – Yeats
    Feb 9 at 14:08






  • 1





    @Mick It's probably my favorite poem as well. I'm working on a little variation of it myself, which is why I have started to dig around in it to see how it's constructed.

    – Yeats
    Feb 9 at 14:09











  • @Yeats: what part are you confused about then? I only see spondaic and trochaic substitutions here. (I'd say dim sea and All times are spondees, and that me and is an iamb, but scansion is to some extent subjective.)

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 9 at 14:31














4












4








4








Ulysses is written in iambic pentameter. There are a few spondees and trochees thrown in for good measure, but I'm confused in some places, like here:




I cannot rest from travel: I will drink

Life to the lees: All times I have enjoy'd

Greatly, have suffer'd greatly, both with those

That loved me, and alone, on shore, and when

Thro' scudding drifts the rainy Hyades

Vext the dim sea: I am become a name




In the second line, there's a trochee (Life to), but then it continues on normally. Ok. Fine. The line after that does the exact same thing (Greatly). What goes on in the fourth and sixth (last) lines, though?




That loved me, and alone, on shore, and when




The first pair (that loved) is an iambic foot, the second (me, and) is what? A trochee? The third (alone) is, finally, an iamb. The rest are iambs.



What goes on in Tennyson's head when he creates such a weird structure? How does he decide to break the rules, and where? Also, is it correct to think in pairs when breaking down a poem like this?



Similarly, the last line is also funky:




Vext the dim sea: I am become a name




Vext the: trochee.



Dim sea: spondee?



There's also a line at the end of the poem that has 11 syllables, but I guess he just thought "shit, this sounds so good I just have to leave it in" because it's the best line in the entire thing. But I'm guessing that's not the usual thought process going on?










share|improve this question
















Ulysses is written in iambic pentameter. There are a few spondees and trochees thrown in for good measure, but I'm confused in some places, like here:




I cannot rest from travel: I will drink

Life to the lees: All times I have enjoy'd

Greatly, have suffer'd greatly, both with those

That loved me, and alone, on shore, and when

Thro' scudding drifts the rainy Hyades

Vext the dim sea: I am become a name




In the second line, there's a trochee (Life to), but then it continues on normally. Ok. Fine. The line after that does the exact same thing (Greatly). What goes on in the fourth and sixth (last) lines, though?




That loved me, and alone, on shore, and when




The first pair (that loved) is an iambic foot, the second (me, and) is what? A trochee? The third (alone) is, finally, an iamb. The rest are iambs.



What goes on in Tennyson's head when he creates such a weird structure? How does he decide to break the rules, and where? Also, is it correct to think in pairs when breaking down a poem like this?



Similarly, the last line is also funky:




Vext the dim sea: I am become a name




Vext the: trochee.



Dim sea: spondee?



There's also a line at the end of the poem that has 11 syllables, but I guess he just thought "shit, this sounds so good I just have to leave it in" because it's the best line in the entire thing. But I'm guessing that's not the usual thought process going on?







poetry meter alfred-tennyson






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 9 at 12:33









Gallifreyan

5,50232067




5,50232067










asked Feb 9 at 12:14









YeatsYeats

1263




1263













  • I cannot hope to give any kind of reasoned answer, but I always read Ulysses as if it were blank verse. It is one of my favourite poems. Does the technical construction matter?

    – Mick
    Feb 9 at 13:54








  • 2





    Substituting trochees for iambs in iambic pentameter (preferably no more than one a line, and not in the last foot) is a thing that goes back to Shakespeare, and probably earlier. See my answer here. Tennyson is not breaking the rules; he is bending them in a way that had been allowed for over 200 years.

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 9 at 13:55













  • @PeterShor Yes, which is why I'm not confused about that part.

    – Yeats
    Feb 9 at 14:08






  • 1





    @Mick It's probably my favorite poem as well. I'm working on a little variation of it myself, which is why I have started to dig around in it to see how it's constructed.

    – Yeats
    Feb 9 at 14:09











  • @Yeats: what part are you confused about then? I only see spondaic and trochaic substitutions here. (I'd say dim sea and All times are spondees, and that me and is an iamb, but scansion is to some extent subjective.)

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 9 at 14:31



















  • I cannot hope to give any kind of reasoned answer, but I always read Ulysses as if it were blank verse. It is one of my favourite poems. Does the technical construction matter?

    – Mick
    Feb 9 at 13:54








  • 2





    Substituting trochees for iambs in iambic pentameter (preferably no more than one a line, and not in the last foot) is a thing that goes back to Shakespeare, and probably earlier. See my answer here. Tennyson is not breaking the rules; he is bending them in a way that had been allowed for over 200 years.

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 9 at 13:55













  • @PeterShor Yes, which is why I'm not confused about that part.

    – Yeats
    Feb 9 at 14:08






  • 1





    @Mick It's probably my favorite poem as well. I'm working on a little variation of it myself, which is why I have started to dig around in it to see how it's constructed.

    – Yeats
    Feb 9 at 14:09











  • @Yeats: what part are you confused about then? I only see spondaic and trochaic substitutions here. (I'd say dim sea and All times are spondees, and that me and is an iamb, but scansion is to some extent subjective.)

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 9 at 14:31

















I cannot hope to give any kind of reasoned answer, but I always read Ulysses as if it were blank verse. It is one of my favourite poems. Does the technical construction matter?

– Mick
Feb 9 at 13:54







I cannot hope to give any kind of reasoned answer, but I always read Ulysses as if it were blank verse. It is one of my favourite poems. Does the technical construction matter?

– Mick
Feb 9 at 13:54






2




2





Substituting trochees for iambs in iambic pentameter (preferably no more than one a line, and not in the last foot) is a thing that goes back to Shakespeare, and probably earlier. See my answer here. Tennyson is not breaking the rules; he is bending them in a way that had been allowed for over 200 years.

– Peter Shor
Feb 9 at 13:55







Substituting trochees for iambs in iambic pentameter (preferably no more than one a line, and not in the last foot) is a thing that goes back to Shakespeare, and probably earlier. See my answer here. Tennyson is not breaking the rules; he is bending them in a way that had been allowed for over 200 years.

– Peter Shor
Feb 9 at 13:55















@PeterShor Yes, which is why I'm not confused about that part.

– Yeats
Feb 9 at 14:08





@PeterShor Yes, which is why I'm not confused about that part.

– Yeats
Feb 9 at 14:08




1




1





@Mick It's probably my favorite poem as well. I'm working on a little variation of it myself, which is why I have started to dig around in it to see how it's constructed.

– Yeats
Feb 9 at 14:09





@Mick It's probably my favorite poem as well. I'm working on a little variation of it myself, which is why I have started to dig around in it to see how it's constructed.

– Yeats
Feb 9 at 14:09













@Yeats: what part are you confused about then? I only see spondaic and trochaic substitutions here. (I'd say dim sea and All times are spondees, and that me and is an iamb, but scansion is to some extent subjective.)

– Peter Shor
Feb 9 at 14:31





@Yeats: what part are you confused about then? I only see spondaic and trochaic substitutions here. (I'd say dim sea and All times are spondees, and that me and is an iamb, but scansion is to some extent subjective.)

– Peter Shor
Feb 9 at 14:31










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7














Tennyson was indeed writing iambic pentameter.



Certain substitutions are traditionally allowed in iambic pentameter, namely, a foot can be replaced by a trochee or a spondee, and two adjacent feet can be replaced by a double iamb.



Here are some examples.



Trochaic substitutions: much have and cities are trochee in the lines:




Much have I seen and known; cities of men

And manners, climates, councils, governments,




Trochaic substitutions are especially common in the first foot of a line, but are allowed in all the feet except the last one.



Spondaic substitutions: day wanes, moon climbs, moans round are all spondees in the lines:




The long day wanes: the slow moon climbs: the deep

Moans round with many voices.




A double iambic substitution, where two adjacent feet have been replaced by a pyrrhus and a spondee (two unstressed syllables followed by two stressed one); for example, which in óld dáys in the line:




We are not now that strength which in old days




Finally, I assume your 11-syllable line is




Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;




This probably wasn't originally supposed to be an 11-syllable line.
When Tennyson was writing, it seems to have permissible to treat the word heaven as one syllable (but not similar words like leaven). This reflected a peculiarity of pronunciation that has disappeared since. See this English stackexchange question.



Although most iambic pentameter uses the above substitutions, some poems adhere to a particularly strict version of iambic pentameter. Although most iambic pentameter uses the above substitutions, some poems adhere to a particularly strict version of iambic pentameter. For example, in Edna St. Vincent Millay's sonnet I will put chaos into fourteen lines, the only deviation from perfect iambic pentameter occur in the first two feet of a line.






share|improve this answer


























  • Seems to me 11-syllable lines are quite common in blank verse. "To be or not to be, that is the question . . . The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune . . ." Are you sure the last foot always has to be an iamb?

    – user14111
    Feb 10 at 6:36






  • 3





    Those are lines with feminine endings, where you add an extra unaccented syllable at the end of an iambic pentameter lines. They are allowed, but Ulysses doesn't have any of those. See my other answer about iambic pentameter.

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 10 at 16:03














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "668"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fliterature.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9354%2fconfused-about-the-meter-and-rhythm-of-ulysses-by-tennyson%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7














Tennyson was indeed writing iambic pentameter.



Certain substitutions are traditionally allowed in iambic pentameter, namely, a foot can be replaced by a trochee or a spondee, and two adjacent feet can be replaced by a double iamb.



Here are some examples.



Trochaic substitutions: much have and cities are trochee in the lines:




Much have I seen and known; cities of men

And manners, climates, councils, governments,




Trochaic substitutions are especially common in the first foot of a line, but are allowed in all the feet except the last one.



Spondaic substitutions: day wanes, moon climbs, moans round are all spondees in the lines:




The long day wanes: the slow moon climbs: the deep

Moans round with many voices.




A double iambic substitution, where two adjacent feet have been replaced by a pyrrhus and a spondee (two unstressed syllables followed by two stressed one); for example, which in óld dáys in the line:




We are not now that strength which in old days




Finally, I assume your 11-syllable line is




Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;




This probably wasn't originally supposed to be an 11-syllable line.
When Tennyson was writing, it seems to have permissible to treat the word heaven as one syllable (but not similar words like leaven). This reflected a peculiarity of pronunciation that has disappeared since. See this English stackexchange question.



Although most iambic pentameter uses the above substitutions, some poems adhere to a particularly strict version of iambic pentameter. Although most iambic pentameter uses the above substitutions, some poems adhere to a particularly strict version of iambic pentameter. For example, in Edna St. Vincent Millay's sonnet I will put chaos into fourteen lines, the only deviation from perfect iambic pentameter occur in the first two feet of a line.






share|improve this answer


























  • Seems to me 11-syllable lines are quite common in blank verse. "To be or not to be, that is the question . . . The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune . . ." Are you sure the last foot always has to be an iamb?

    – user14111
    Feb 10 at 6:36






  • 3





    Those are lines with feminine endings, where you add an extra unaccented syllable at the end of an iambic pentameter lines. They are allowed, but Ulysses doesn't have any of those. See my other answer about iambic pentameter.

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 10 at 16:03


















7














Tennyson was indeed writing iambic pentameter.



Certain substitutions are traditionally allowed in iambic pentameter, namely, a foot can be replaced by a trochee or a spondee, and two adjacent feet can be replaced by a double iamb.



Here are some examples.



Trochaic substitutions: much have and cities are trochee in the lines:




Much have I seen and known; cities of men

And manners, climates, councils, governments,




Trochaic substitutions are especially common in the first foot of a line, but are allowed in all the feet except the last one.



Spondaic substitutions: day wanes, moon climbs, moans round are all spondees in the lines:




The long day wanes: the slow moon climbs: the deep

Moans round with many voices.




A double iambic substitution, where two adjacent feet have been replaced by a pyrrhus and a spondee (two unstressed syllables followed by two stressed one); for example, which in óld dáys in the line:




We are not now that strength which in old days




Finally, I assume your 11-syllable line is




Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;




This probably wasn't originally supposed to be an 11-syllable line.
When Tennyson was writing, it seems to have permissible to treat the word heaven as one syllable (but not similar words like leaven). This reflected a peculiarity of pronunciation that has disappeared since. See this English stackexchange question.



Although most iambic pentameter uses the above substitutions, some poems adhere to a particularly strict version of iambic pentameter. Although most iambic pentameter uses the above substitutions, some poems adhere to a particularly strict version of iambic pentameter. For example, in Edna St. Vincent Millay's sonnet I will put chaos into fourteen lines, the only deviation from perfect iambic pentameter occur in the first two feet of a line.






share|improve this answer


























  • Seems to me 11-syllable lines are quite common in blank verse. "To be or not to be, that is the question . . . The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune . . ." Are you sure the last foot always has to be an iamb?

    – user14111
    Feb 10 at 6:36






  • 3





    Those are lines with feminine endings, where you add an extra unaccented syllable at the end of an iambic pentameter lines. They are allowed, but Ulysses doesn't have any of those. See my other answer about iambic pentameter.

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 10 at 16:03
















7












7








7







Tennyson was indeed writing iambic pentameter.



Certain substitutions are traditionally allowed in iambic pentameter, namely, a foot can be replaced by a trochee or a spondee, and two adjacent feet can be replaced by a double iamb.



Here are some examples.



Trochaic substitutions: much have and cities are trochee in the lines:




Much have I seen and known; cities of men

And manners, climates, councils, governments,




Trochaic substitutions are especially common in the first foot of a line, but are allowed in all the feet except the last one.



Spondaic substitutions: day wanes, moon climbs, moans round are all spondees in the lines:




The long day wanes: the slow moon climbs: the deep

Moans round with many voices.




A double iambic substitution, where two adjacent feet have been replaced by a pyrrhus and a spondee (two unstressed syllables followed by two stressed one); for example, which in óld dáys in the line:




We are not now that strength which in old days




Finally, I assume your 11-syllable line is




Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;




This probably wasn't originally supposed to be an 11-syllable line.
When Tennyson was writing, it seems to have permissible to treat the word heaven as one syllable (but not similar words like leaven). This reflected a peculiarity of pronunciation that has disappeared since. See this English stackexchange question.



Although most iambic pentameter uses the above substitutions, some poems adhere to a particularly strict version of iambic pentameter. Although most iambic pentameter uses the above substitutions, some poems adhere to a particularly strict version of iambic pentameter. For example, in Edna St. Vincent Millay's sonnet I will put chaos into fourteen lines, the only deviation from perfect iambic pentameter occur in the first two feet of a line.






share|improve this answer















Tennyson was indeed writing iambic pentameter.



Certain substitutions are traditionally allowed in iambic pentameter, namely, a foot can be replaced by a trochee or a spondee, and two adjacent feet can be replaced by a double iamb.



Here are some examples.



Trochaic substitutions: much have and cities are trochee in the lines:




Much have I seen and known; cities of men

And manners, climates, councils, governments,




Trochaic substitutions are especially common in the first foot of a line, but are allowed in all the feet except the last one.



Spondaic substitutions: day wanes, moon climbs, moans round are all spondees in the lines:




The long day wanes: the slow moon climbs: the deep

Moans round with many voices.




A double iambic substitution, where two adjacent feet have been replaced by a pyrrhus and a spondee (two unstressed syllables followed by two stressed one); for example, which in óld dáys in the line:




We are not now that strength which in old days




Finally, I assume your 11-syllable line is




Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;




This probably wasn't originally supposed to be an 11-syllable line.
When Tennyson was writing, it seems to have permissible to treat the word heaven as one syllable (but not similar words like leaven). This reflected a peculiarity of pronunciation that has disappeared since. See this English stackexchange question.



Although most iambic pentameter uses the above substitutions, some poems adhere to a particularly strict version of iambic pentameter. Although most iambic pentameter uses the above substitutions, some poems adhere to a particularly strict version of iambic pentameter. For example, in Edna St. Vincent Millay's sonnet I will put chaos into fourteen lines, the only deviation from perfect iambic pentameter occur in the first two feet of a line.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 9 at 11:05

























answered Feb 9 at 15:22









Peter ShorPeter Shor

3,1111322




3,1111322













  • Seems to me 11-syllable lines are quite common in blank verse. "To be or not to be, that is the question . . . The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune . . ." Are you sure the last foot always has to be an iamb?

    – user14111
    Feb 10 at 6:36






  • 3





    Those are lines with feminine endings, where you add an extra unaccented syllable at the end of an iambic pentameter lines. They are allowed, but Ulysses doesn't have any of those. See my other answer about iambic pentameter.

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 10 at 16:03





















  • Seems to me 11-syllable lines are quite common in blank verse. "To be or not to be, that is the question . . . The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune . . ." Are you sure the last foot always has to be an iamb?

    – user14111
    Feb 10 at 6:36






  • 3





    Those are lines with feminine endings, where you add an extra unaccented syllable at the end of an iambic pentameter lines. They are allowed, but Ulysses doesn't have any of those. See my other answer about iambic pentameter.

    – Peter Shor
    Feb 10 at 16:03



















Seems to me 11-syllable lines are quite common in blank verse. "To be or not to be, that is the question . . . The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune . . ." Are you sure the last foot always has to be an iamb?

– user14111
Feb 10 at 6:36





Seems to me 11-syllable lines are quite common in blank verse. "To be or not to be, that is the question . . . The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune . . ." Are you sure the last foot always has to be an iamb?

– user14111
Feb 10 at 6:36




3




3





Those are lines with feminine endings, where you add an extra unaccented syllable at the end of an iambic pentameter lines. They are allowed, but Ulysses doesn't have any of those. See my other answer about iambic pentameter.

– Peter Shor
Feb 10 at 16:03







Those are lines with feminine endings, where you add an extra unaccented syllable at the end of an iambic pentameter lines. They are allowed, but Ulysses doesn't have any of those. See my other answer about iambic pentameter.

– Peter Shor
Feb 10 at 16:03




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Literature Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fliterature.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9354%2fconfused-about-the-meter-and-rhythm-of-ulysses-by-tennyson%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

張江高科駅