Compact spaces in which any closed set can be partitioned into finitely many closed sets whose clopen subsets...
$begingroup$
Let $X $ be a compact topological space (not necessarilly Hausdorff). I am looking for a charactrization for the following property:
Property: If $C $ is a closed subset of $X $, then there are pairwise disjoint closed subsets $C_1$,...,$C_n $ of $X $ such that $C=C_1cupdotscup C_n $, and each $C_i $ has the property that if $A $ is a clopen subest of $C_i $, then there exists a clopen subset $B $ of $X $ with $A=C_icap B$?
Any comment is very welcome.
general-topology compactness connectedness
$endgroup$
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $X $ be a compact topological space (not necessarilly Hausdorff). I am looking for a charactrization for the following property:
Property: If $C $ is a closed subset of $X $, then there are pairwise disjoint closed subsets $C_1$,...,$C_n $ of $X $ such that $C=C_1cupdotscup C_n $, and each $C_i $ has the property that if $A $ is a clopen subest of $C_i $, then there exists a clopen subset $B $ of $X $ with $A=C_icap B$?
Any comment is very welcome.
general-topology compactness connectedness
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
The spaces that every closed subset has finitely many connected components are example of such spaces.
$endgroup$
– Es.Ro
Jan 16 at 17:21
2
$begingroup$
Well, in the case that $X$ is Hausdorff, this is equivalent to total disconnectedness.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Jan 16 at 19:02
$begingroup$
By “clopen subset of $C_i$”, you surely mean “subset clopen w.r.t. the subspace topology of $C_i$”?
$endgroup$
– Luke
Jan 16 at 22:29
$begingroup$
@Luke, yes in the subspace topology.
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 2:35
1
$begingroup$
Neither direction is obvious; I'm writing an answer elaborating now.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Jan 17 at 2:51
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $X $ be a compact topological space (not necessarilly Hausdorff). I am looking for a charactrization for the following property:
Property: If $C $ is a closed subset of $X $, then there are pairwise disjoint closed subsets $C_1$,...,$C_n $ of $X $ such that $C=C_1cupdotscup C_n $, and each $C_i $ has the property that if $A $ is a clopen subest of $C_i $, then there exists a clopen subset $B $ of $X $ with $A=C_icap B$?
Any comment is very welcome.
general-topology compactness connectedness
$endgroup$
Let $X $ be a compact topological space (not necessarilly Hausdorff). I am looking for a charactrization for the following property:
Property: If $C $ is a closed subset of $X $, then there are pairwise disjoint closed subsets $C_1$,...,$C_n $ of $X $ such that $C=C_1cupdotscup C_n $, and each $C_i $ has the property that if $A $ is a clopen subest of $C_i $, then there exists a clopen subset $B $ of $X $ with $A=C_icap B$?
Any comment is very welcome.
general-topology compactness connectedness
general-topology compactness connectedness
edited Jan 17 at 2:59
Eric Wofsey
192k14220352
192k14220352
asked Jan 16 at 17:01
Andy.GAndy.G
935
935
4
$begingroup$
The spaces that every closed subset has finitely many connected components are example of such spaces.
$endgroup$
– Es.Ro
Jan 16 at 17:21
2
$begingroup$
Well, in the case that $X$ is Hausdorff, this is equivalent to total disconnectedness.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Jan 16 at 19:02
$begingroup$
By “clopen subset of $C_i$”, you surely mean “subset clopen w.r.t. the subspace topology of $C_i$”?
$endgroup$
– Luke
Jan 16 at 22:29
$begingroup$
@Luke, yes in the subspace topology.
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 2:35
1
$begingroup$
Neither direction is obvious; I'm writing an answer elaborating now.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Jan 17 at 2:51
|
show 5 more comments
4
$begingroup$
The spaces that every closed subset has finitely many connected components are example of such spaces.
$endgroup$
– Es.Ro
Jan 16 at 17:21
2
$begingroup$
Well, in the case that $X$ is Hausdorff, this is equivalent to total disconnectedness.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Jan 16 at 19:02
$begingroup$
By “clopen subset of $C_i$”, you surely mean “subset clopen w.r.t. the subspace topology of $C_i$”?
$endgroup$
– Luke
Jan 16 at 22:29
$begingroup$
@Luke, yes in the subspace topology.
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 2:35
1
$begingroup$
Neither direction is obvious; I'm writing an answer elaborating now.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Jan 17 at 2:51
4
4
$begingroup$
The spaces that every closed subset has finitely many connected components are example of such spaces.
$endgroup$
– Es.Ro
Jan 16 at 17:21
$begingroup$
The spaces that every closed subset has finitely many connected components are example of such spaces.
$endgroup$
– Es.Ro
Jan 16 at 17:21
2
2
$begingroup$
Well, in the case that $X$ is Hausdorff, this is equivalent to total disconnectedness.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Jan 16 at 19:02
$begingroup$
Well, in the case that $X$ is Hausdorff, this is equivalent to total disconnectedness.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Jan 16 at 19:02
$begingroup$
By “clopen subset of $C_i$”, you surely mean “subset clopen w.r.t. the subspace topology of $C_i$”?
$endgroup$
– Luke
Jan 16 at 22:29
$begingroup$
By “clopen subset of $C_i$”, you surely mean “subset clopen w.r.t. the subspace topology of $C_i$”?
$endgroup$
– Luke
Jan 16 at 22:29
$begingroup$
@Luke, yes in the subspace topology.
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 2:35
$begingroup$
@Luke, yes in the subspace topology.
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 2:35
1
1
$begingroup$
Neither direction is obvious; I'm writing an answer elaborating now.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Jan 17 at 2:51
$begingroup$
Neither direction is obvious; I'm writing an answer elaborating now.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Jan 17 at 2:51
|
show 5 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I don't see any reason to believe there is a simpler necessary and sufficient condition in general. When $X$ is Hausdorff there is one, though: your condition is equivalent to $X$ being totally disconnected.
To prove this, first suppose $X$ is compact Hausdorff and totally disconnected. Then clopen sets separate points of $X$ (see Any two points in a Stone space can be disconnected by clopen sets). It follows by compactness that clopen sets also separate closed sets (the proof is the same as the proof that a compact Hausdorff space is normal, just using clopen sets instead of open sets everywhere). So in particular, if $Csubseteq X$ is closed and $A$ is clopen in $C$, then $A$ and $Csetminus A$ can be separated by clopen subsets of $X$ (since they are disjoint and closed in $X$). This means that your condition holds, with $n=1$.
Conversely, suppose $X$ is compact Hausdorff and not totally disconnected. Your property is inherited by closed subspaces, so we may replace $X$ with one of its nontrivial connected components. So, we assume $X$ is compact Hausdorff and connected and has more than one point, and must show it does not satisfy your condition.
To prove this, pick an infinite discrete subset $Dsubset X$ (see Every infinite Hausdorff space has an infinite discrete subspace) and consider $C=overline{D}$. Suppose a decomposition $C=C_1cupdotscup C_n$ with your property existed. Note that each point of $D$ is isolated in $C$, and some $C_i$ must contain infinitely many points of $D$. In particular, some $C_i$ must be disconnected, so there is a nontrivial clopen subset $Asubset C_i$. But $X$ is connected, so it has no nontrivial clopen subsets, and so $A$ cannot be $Bcap C_i$ for any clopen $Bsubseteq X$.
Of course, total disconnectedness is not necessary in the non-Hausdorff case (I don't know whether it is sufficient). Besides trivial examples like the indiscrete topology, there is also the cofinite topology on any set. More generally, as Es.Ro commented, a sufficient condition is that every closed subset of $X$ has only finitely many connected components, since then you can take the connected components as the $C_i$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer.
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 3:00
$begingroup$
Can we find a special family $F $ of closed subsets of $X $ (in non Hausdorff case) such that if each element of $F $ has a partition with the stated property, then all close subsets of $X $ have a partition with the stated property?
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 14:55
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075982%2fcompact-spaces-in-which-any-closed-set-can-be-partitioned-into-finitely-many-clo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I don't see any reason to believe there is a simpler necessary and sufficient condition in general. When $X$ is Hausdorff there is one, though: your condition is equivalent to $X$ being totally disconnected.
To prove this, first suppose $X$ is compact Hausdorff and totally disconnected. Then clopen sets separate points of $X$ (see Any two points in a Stone space can be disconnected by clopen sets). It follows by compactness that clopen sets also separate closed sets (the proof is the same as the proof that a compact Hausdorff space is normal, just using clopen sets instead of open sets everywhere). So in particular, if $Csubseteq X$ is closed and $A$ is clopen in $C$, then $A$ and $Csetminus A$ can be separated by clopen subsets of $X$ (since they are disjoint and closed in $X$). This means that your condition holds, with $n=1$.
Conversely, suppose $X$ is compact Hausdorff and not totally disconnected. Your property is inherited by closed subspaces, so we may replace $X$ with one of its nontrivial connected components. So, we assume $X$ is compact Hausdorff and connected and has more than one point, and must show it does not satisfy your condition.
To prove this, pick an infinite discrete subset $Dsubset X$ (see Every infinite Hausdorff space has an infinite discrete subspace) and consider $C=overline{D}$. Suppose a decomposition $C=C_1cupdotscup C_n$ with your property existed. Note that each point of $D$ is isolated in $C$, and some $C_i$ must contain infinitely many points of $D$. In particular, some $C_i$ must be disconnected, so there is a nontrivial clopen subset $Asubset C_i$. But $X$ is connected, so it has no nontrivial clopen subsets, and so $A$ cannot be $Bcap C_i$ for any clopen $Bsubseteq X$.
Of course, total disconnectedness is not necessary in the non-Hausdorff case (I don't know whether it is sufficient). Besides trivial examples like the indiscrete topology, there is also the cofinite topology on any set. More generally, as Es.Ro commented, a sufficient condition is that every closed subset of $X$ has only finitely many connected components, since then you can take the connected components as the $C_i$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer.
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 3:00
$begingroup$
Can we find a special family $F $ of closed subsets of $X $ (in non Hausdorff case) such that if each element of $F $ has a partition with the stated property, then all close subsets of $X $ have a partition with the stated property?
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 14:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't see any reason to believe there is a simpler necessary and sufficient condition in general. When $X$ is Hausdorff there is one, though: your condition is equivalent to $X$ being totally disconnected.
To prove this, first suppose $X$ is compact Hausdorff and totally disconnected. Then clopen sets separate points of $X$ (see Any two points in a Stone space can be disconnected by clopen sets). It follows by compactness that clopen sets also separate closed sets (the proof is the same as the proof that a compact Hausdorff space is normal, just using clopen sets instead of open sets everywhere). So in particular, if $Csubseteq X$ is closed and $A$ is clopen in $C$, then $A$ and $Csetminus A$ can be separated by clopen subsets of $X$ (since they are disjoint and closed in $X$). This means that your condition holds, with $n=1$.
Conversely, suppose $X$ is compact Hausdorff and not totally disconnected. Your property is inherited by closed subspaces, so we may replace $X$ with one of its nontrivial connected components. So, we assume $X$ is compact Hausdorff and connected and has more than one point, and must show it does not satisfy your condition.
To prove this, pick an infinite discrete subset $Dsubset X$ (see Every infinite Hausdorff space has an infinite discrete subspace) and consider $C=overline{D}$. Suppose a decomposition $C=C_1cupdotscup C_n$ with your property existed. Note that each point of $D$ is isolated in $C$, and some $C_i$ must contain infinitely many points of $D$. In particular, some $C_i$ must be disconnected, so there is a nontrivial clopen subset $Asubset C_i$. But $X$ is connected, so it has no nontrivial clopen subsets, and so $A$ cannot be $Bcap C_i$ for any clopen $Bsubseteq X$.
Of course, total disconnectedness is not necessary in the non-Hausdorff case (I don't know whether it is sufficient). Besides trivial examples like the indiscrete topology, there is also the cofinite topology on any set. More generally, as Es.Ro commented, a sufficient condition is that every closed subset of $X$ has only finitely many connected components, since then you can take the connected components as the $C_i$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer.
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 3:00
$begingroup$
Can we find a special family $F $ of closed subsets of $X $ (in non Hausdorff case) such that if each element of $F $ has a partition with the stated property, then all close subsets of $X $ have a partition with the stated property?
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 14:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't see any reason to believe there is a simpler necessary and sufficient condition in general. When $X$ is Hausdorff there is one, though: your condition is equivalent to $X$ being totally disconnected.
To prove this, first suppose $X$ is compact Hausdorff and totally disconnected. Then clopen sets separate points of $X$ (see Any two points in a Stone space can be disconnected by clopen sets). It follows by compactness that clopen sets also separate closed sets (the proof is the same as the proof that a compact Hausdorff space is normal, just using clopen sets instead of open sets everywhere). So in particular, if $Csubseteq X$ is closed and $A$ is clopen in $C$, then $A$ and $Csetminus A$ can be separated by clopen subsets of $X$ (since they are disjoint and closed in $X$). This means that your condition holds, with $n=1$.
Conversely, suppose $X$ is compact Hausdorff and not totally disconnected. Your property is inherited by closed subspaces, so we may replace $X$ with one of its nontrivial connected components. So, we assume $X$ is compact Hausdorff and connected and has more than one point, and must show it does not satisfy your condition.
To prove this, pick an infinite discrete subset $Dsubset X$ (see Every infinite Hausdorff space has an infinite discrete subspace) and consider $C=overline{D}$. Suppose a decomposition $C=C_1cupdotscup C_n$ with your property existed. Note that each point of $D$ is isolated in $C$, and some $C_i$ must contain infinitely many points of $D$. In particular, some $C_i$ must be disconnected, so there is a nontrivial clopen subset $Asubset C_i$. But $X$ is connected, so it has no nontrivial clopen subsets, and so $A$ cannot be $Bcap C_i$ for any clopen $Bsubseteq X$.
Of course, total disconnectedness is not necessary in the non-Hausdorff case (I don't know whether it is sufficient). Besides trivial examples like the indiscrete topology, there is also the cofinite topology on any set. More generally, as Es.Ro commented, a sufficient condition is that every closed subset of $X$ has only finitely many connected components, since then you can take the connected components as the $C_i$.
$endgroup$
I don't see any reason to believe there is a simpler necessary and sufficient condition in general. When $X$ is Hausdorff there is one, though: your condition is equivalent to $X$ being totally disconnected.
To prove this, first suppose $X$ is compact Hausdorff and totally disconnected. Then clopen sets separate points of $X$ (see Any two points in a Stone space can be disconnected by clopen sets). It follows by compactness that clopen sets also separate closed sets (the proof is the same as the proof that a compact Hausdorff space is normal, just using clopen sets instead of open sets everywhere). So in particular, if $Csubseteq X$ is closed and $A$ is clopen in $C$, then $A$ and $Csetminus A$ can be separated by clopen subsets of $X$ (since they are disjoint and closed in $X$). This means that your condition holds, with $n=1$.
Conversely, suppose $X$ is compact Hausdorff and not totally disconnected. Your property is inherited by closed subspaces, so we may replace $X$ with one of its nontrivial connected components. So, we assume $X$ is compact Hausdorff and connected and has more than one point, and must show it does not satisfy your condition.
To prove this, pick an infinite discrete subset $Dsubset X$ (see Every infinite Hausdorff space has an infinite discrete subspace) and consider $C=overline{D}$. Suppose a decomposition $C=C_1cupdotscup C_n$ with your property existed. Note that each point of $D$ is isolated in $C$, and some $C_i$ must contain infinitely many points of $D$. In particular, some $C_i$ must be disconnected, so there is a nontrivial clopen subset $Asubset C_i$. But $X$ is connected, so it has no nontrivial clopen subsets, and so $A$ cannot be $Bcap C_i$ for any clopen $Bsubseteq X$.
Of course, total disconnectedness is not necessary in the non-Hausdorff case (I don't know whether it is sufficient). Besides trivial examples like the indiscrete topology, there is also the cofinite topology on any set. More generally, as Es.Ro commented, a sufficient condition is that every closed subset of $X$ has only finitely many connected components, since then you can take the connected components as the $C_i$.
answered Jan 17 at 2:54
Eric WofseyEric Wofsey
192k14220352
192k14220352
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer.
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 3:00
$begingroup$
Can we find a special family $F $ of closed subsets of $X $ (in non Hausdorff case) such that if each element of $F $ has a partition with the stated property, then all close subsets of $X $ have a partition with the stated property?
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 14:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer.
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 3:00
$begingroup$
Can we find a special family $F $ of closed subsets of $X $ (in non Hausdorff case) such that if each element of $F $ has a partition with the stated property, then all close subsets of $X $ have a partition with the stated property?
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 14:55
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer.
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 3:00
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer.
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 3:00
$begingroup$
Can we find a special family $F $ of closed subsets of $X $ (in non Hausdorff case) such that if each element of $F $ has a partition with the stated property, then all close subsets of $X $ have a partition with the stated property?
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 14:55
$begingroup$
Can we find a special family $F $ of closed subsets of $X $ (in non Hausdorff case) such that if each element of $F $ has a partition with the stated property, then all close subsets of $X $ have a partition with the stated property?
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 14:55
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075982%2fcompact-spaces-in-which-any-closed-set-can-be-partitioned-into-finitely-many-clo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
The spaces that every closed subset has finitely many connected components are example of such spaces.
$endgroup$
– Es.Ro
Jan 16 at 17:21
2
$begingroup$
Well, in the case that $X$ is Hausdorff, this is equivalent to total disconnectedness.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Jan 16 at 19:02
$begingroup$
By “clopen subset of $C_i$”, you surely mean “subset clopen w.r.t. the subspace topology of $C_i$”?
$endgroup$
– Luke
Jan 16 at 22:29
$begingroup$
@Luke, yes in the subspace topology.
$endgroup$
– Andy.G
Jan 17 at 2:35
1
$begingroup$
Neither direction is obvious; I'm writing an answer elaborating now.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Jan 17 at 2:51