Linear combination of Chi-squared distrubuted variables with ascending degrees of freedom
$begingroup$
If we have i.i.d. random variables$ quad X_1,dots , X_n, text{where} X_k sim mathcal{N} (mu_k,sigma_k^2),$ $quad$ then $$ Y =sum_{k=1}^n a_k X_n sim mathcal{N} (sum_{k=1}^n a_k mu_k,sum_{k=1}^n a_k^2sigma_k^2). $$
But what we can do with similar (or at least simplified) linear combination of $ (X_k)_{k=1}^n , X_k sim chi^2(k) ? $
Example:
Let $X,Y sim mathcal{N}(0,1)$ be independent random variables. What is the distribution of $ Z = XY $ ?
$$ XY = frac{1}{2}(X^2 + 2XY + Y^2) - frac{1}{2}(X^2 + Y^2) =left ( frac{X+Y}{sqrt{2}} right ) ^2 - frac{1}{2}(X^2 + Y^2) $$
Of course we have that $$ frac{X+Y}{sqrt{2}} = frac{frac{X+Y}{2} - 0}{1} sqrt{2} sim mathcal{N}(0,1) $$
Denoting $ Z_1 = left ( frac{X+Y}{sqrt{2}} right )^2 sim chi^2(1) , $ $ Z_2 = X^2 + Y^2 sim chi^2(2) , $ we have
$$ XY = Z_1 + frac{1}{2} Z_2 = sum_{k=1}^2 frac{Z_k}{k}, $$
where $ Z_k sim chi^2(k) .$
What more we can do with this kind of approach? I don't have any ideas, nor I can find anything useful at this matter.
probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If we have i.i.d. random variables$ quad X_1,dots , X_n, text{where} X_k sim mathcal{N} (mu_k,sigma_k^2),$ $quad$ then $$ Y =sum_{k=1}^n a_k X_n sim mathcal{N} (sum_{k=1}^n a_k mu_k,sum_{k=1}^n a_k^2sigma_k^2). $$
But what we can do with similar (or at least simplified) linear combination of $ (X_k)_{k=1}^n , X_k sim chi^2(k) ? $
Example:
Let $X,Y sim mathcal{N}(0,1)$ be independent random variables. What is the distribution of $ Z = XY $ ?
$$ XY = frac{1}{2}(X^2 + 2XY + Y^2) - frac{1}{2}(X^2 + Y^2) =left ( frac{X+Y}{sqrt{2}} right ) ^2 - frac{1}{2}(X^2 + Y^2) $$
Of course we have that $$ frac{X+Y}{sqrt{2}} = frac{frac{X+Y}{2} - 0}{1} sqrt{2} sim mathcal{N}(0,1) $$
Denoting $ Z_1 = left ( frac{X+Y}{sqrt{2}} right )^2 sim chi^2(1) , $ $ Z_2 = X^2 + Y^2 sim chi^2(2) , $ we have
$$ XY = Z_1 + frac{1}{2} Z_2 = sum_{k=1}^2 frac{Z_k}{k}, $$
where $ Z_k sim chi^2(k) .$
What more we can do with this kind of approach? I don't have any ideas, nor I can find anything useful at this matter.
probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Should I maybe take product of characteristic functions and try to compute inverse Fourier transformat?
$endgroup$
– Kusavil
Feb 16 '15 at 12:15
1
$begingroup$
I don't see any profit in this perspective for $XY$. Especially because $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are not independent.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Feb 16 '15 at 12:38
$begingroup$
Right! Thank you, so it's a wrong example. But have you by any chance heard if there is any nice formula for $chi^2$ distributed variables (let's say independent ones) with different degrees of freedom? Or at least for variables with the same degree of freedom?
$endgroup$
– Kusavil
Feb 16 '15 at 13:26
1
$begingroup$
If $chi_k^2$ and $chi_m^2$ are independent then $chi_k^2+chi_m^2$ and $chi_{k+m}^2$ have the same distribution.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Feb 16 '15 at 14:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If we have i.i.d. random variables$ quad X_1,dots , X_n, text{where} X_k sim mathcal{N} (mu_k,sigma_k^2),$ $quad$ then $$ Y =sum_{k=1}^n a_k X_n sim mathcal{N} (sum_{k=1}^n a_k mu_k,sum_{k=1}^n a_k^2sigma_k^2). $$
But what we can do with similar (or at least simplified) linear combination of $ (X_k)_{k=1}^n , X_k sim chi^2(k) ? $
Example:
Let $X,Y sim mathcal{N}(0,1)$ be independent random variables. What is the distribution of $ Z = XY $ ?
$$ XY = frac{1}{2}(X^2 + 2XY + Y^2) - frac{1}{2}(X^2 + Y^2) =left ( frac{X+Y}{sqrt{2}} right ) ^2 - frac{1}{2}(X^2 + Y^2) $$
Of course we have that $$ frac{X+Y}{sqrt{2}} = frac{frac{X+Y}{2} - 0}{1} sqrt{2} sim mathcal{N}(0,1) $$
Denoting $ Z_1 = left ( frac{X+Y}{sqrt{2}} right )^2 sim chi^2(1) , $ $ Z_2 = X^2 + Y^2 sim chi^2(2) , $ we have
$$ XY = Z_1 + frac{1}{2} Z_2 = sum_{k=1}^2 frac{Z_k}{k}, $$
where $ Z_k sim chi^2(k) .$
What more we can do with this kind of approach? I don't have any ideas, nor I can find anything useful at this matter.
probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
$endgroup$
If we have i.i.d. random variables$ quad X_1,dots , X_n, text{where} X_k sim mathcal{N} (mu_k,sigma_k^2),$ $quad$ then $$ Y =sum_{k=1}^n a_k X_n sim mathcal{N} (sum_{k=1}^n a_k mu_k,sum_{k=1}^n a_k^2sigma_k^2). $$
But what we can do with similar (or at least simplified) linear combination of $ (X_k)_{k=1}^n , X_k sim chi^2(k) ? $
Example:
Let $X,Y sim mathcal{N}(0,1)$ be independent random variables. What is the distribution of $ Z = XY $ ?
$$ XY = frac{1}{2}(X^2 + 2XY + Y^2) - frac{1}{2}(X^2 + Y^2) =left ( frac{X+Y}{sqrt{2}} right ) ^2 - frac{1}{2}(X^2 + Y^2) $$
Of course we have that $$ frac{X+Y}{sqrt{2}} = frac{frac{X+Y}{2} - 0}{1} sqrt{2} sim mathcal{N}(0,1) $$
Denoting $ Z_1 = left ( frac{X+Y}{sqrt{2}} right )^2 sim chi^2(1) , $ $ Z_2 = X^2 + Y^2 sim chi^2(2) , $ we have
$$ XY = Z_1 + frac{1}{2} Z_2 = sum_{k=1}^2 frac{Z_k}{k}, $$
where $ Z_k sim chi^2(k) .$
What more we can do with this kind of approach? I don't have any ideas, nor I can find anything useful at this matter.
probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
asked Feb 16 '15 at 12:07
KusavilKusavil
363213
363213
$begingroup$
Should I maybe take product of characteristic functions and try to compute inverse Fourier transformat?
$endgroup$
– Kusavil
Feb 16 '15 at 12:15
1
$begingroup$
I don't see any profit in this perspective for $XY$. Especially because $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are not independent.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Feb 16 '15 at 12:38
$begingroup$
Right! Thank you, so it's a wrong example. But have you by any chance heard if there is any nice formula for $chi^2$ distributed variables (let's say independent ones) with different degrees of freedom? Or at least for variables with the same degree of freedom?
$endgroup$
– Kusavil
Feb 16 '15 at 13:26
1
$begingroup$
If $chi_k^2$ and $chi_m^2$ are independent then $chi_k^2+chi_m^2$ and $chi_{k+m}^2$ have the same distribution.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Feb 16 '15 at 14:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Should I maybe take product of characteristic functions and try to compute inverse Fourier transformat?
$endgroup$
– Kusavil
Feb 16 '15 at 12:15
1
$begingroup$
I don't see any profit in this perspective for $XY$. Especially because $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are not independent.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Feb 16 '15 at 12:38
$begingroup$
Right! Thank you, so it's a wrong example. But have you by any chance heard if there is any nice formula for $chi^2$ distributed variables (let's say independent ones) with different degrees of freedom? Or at least for variables with the same degree of freedom?
$endgroup$
– Kusavil
Feb 16 '15 at 13:26
1
$begingroup$
If $chi_k^2$ and $chi_m^2$ are independent then $chi_k^2+chi_m^2$ and $chi_{k+m}^2$ have the same distribution.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Feb 16 '15 at 14:21
$begingroup$
Should I maybe take product of characteristic functions and try to compute inverse Fourier transformat?
$endgroup$
– Kusavil
Feb 16 '15 at 12:15
$begingroup$
Should I maybe take product of characteristic functions and try to compute inverse Fourier transformat?
$endgroup$
– Kusavil
Feb 16 '15 at 12:15
1
1
$begingroup$
I don't see any profit in this perspective for $XY$. Especially because $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are not independent.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Feb 16 '15 at 12:38
$begingroup$
I don't see any profit in this perspective for $XY$. Especially because $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are not independent.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Feb 16 '15 at 12:38
$begingroup$
Right! Thank you, so it's a wrong example. But have you by any chance heard if there is any nice formula for $chi^2$ distributed variables (let's say independent ones) with different degrees of freedom? Or at least for variables with the same degree of freedom?
$endgroup$
– Kusavil
Feb 16 '15 at 13:26
$begingroup$
Right! Thank you, so it's a wrong example. But have you by any chance heard if there is any nice formula for $chi^2$ distributed variables (let's say independent ones) with different degrees of freedom? Or at least for variables with the same degree of freedom?
$endgroup$
– Kusavil
Feb 16 '15 at 13:26
1
1
$begingroup$
If $chi_k^2$ and $chi_m^2$ are independent then $chi_k^2+chi_m^2$ and $chi_{k+m}^2$ have the same distribution.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Feb 16 '15 at 14:21
$begingroup$
If $chi_k^2$ and $chi_m^2$ are independent then $chi_k^2+chi_m^2$ and $chi_{k+m}^2$ have the same distribution.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Feb 16 '15 at 14:21
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are correlated so the sum is not like a sum of independent chi-square distributed variables.
If you use instead $Z_1 = X-Y$ and $Z_2 = X+Y$ which are two independent variables distributed as $N(0,2)$, then $$XY = frac{1}{4}Z_1^2- frac{1}{4} Z_2^2$$ thus the product XY it is distributed as the difference of two chi-square distributed variables.
This has a variance-gamma distribution as explained in https://math.stackexchange.com/a/85525/466748
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1150437%2flinear-combination-of-chi-squared-distrubuted-variables-with-ascending-degrees-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are correlated so the sum is not like a sum of independent chi-square distributed variables.
If you use instead $Z_1 = X-Y$ and $Z_2 = X+Y$ which are two independent variables distributed as $N(0,2)$, then $$XY = frac{1}{4}Z_1^2- frac{1}{4} Z_2^2$$ thus the product XY it is distributed as the difference of two chi-square distributed variables.
This has a variance-gamma distribution as explained in https://math.stackexchange.com/a/85525/466748
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are correlated so the sum is not like a sum of independent chi-square distributed variables.
If you use instead $Z_1 = X-Y$ and $Z_2 = X+Y$ which are two independent variables distributed as $N(0,2)$, then $$XY = frac{1}{4}Z_1^2- frac{1}{4} Z_2^2$$ thus the product XY it is distributed as the difference of two chi-square distributed variables.
This has a variance-gamma distribution as explained in https://math.stackexchange.com/a/85525/466748
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are correlated so the sum is not like a sum of independent chi-square distributed variables.
If you use instead $Z_1 = X-Y$ and $Z_2 = X+Y$ which are two independent variables distributed as $N(0,2)$, then $$XY = frac{1}{4}Z_1^2- frac{1}{4} Z_2^2$$ thus the product XY it is distributed as the difference of two chi-square distributed variables.
This has a variance-gamma distribution as explained in https://math.stackexchange.com/a/85525/466748
$endgroup$
Your $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are correlated so the sum is not like a sum of independent chi-square distributed variables.
If you use instead $Z_1 = X-Y$ and $Z_2 = X+Y$ which are two independent variables distributed as $N(0,2)$, then $$XY = frac{1}{4}Z_1^2- frac{1}{4} Z_2^2$$ thus the product XY it is distributed as the difference of two chi-square distributed variables.
This has a variance-gamma distribution as explained in https://math.stackexchange.com/a/85525/466748
answered Jun 7 '18 at 8:14
Martijn WeteringsMartijn Weterings
17010
17010
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1150437%2flinear-combination-of-chi-squared-distrubuted-variables-with-ascending-degrees-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Should I maybe take product of characteristic functions and try to compute inverse Fourier transformat?
$endgroup$
– Kusavil
Feb 16 '15 at 12:15
1
$begingroup$
I don't see any profit in this perspective for $XY$. Especially because $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are not independent.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Feb 16 '15 at 12:38
$begingroup$
Right! Thank you, so it's a wrong example. But have you by any chance heard if there is any nice formula for $chi^2$ distributed variables (let's say independent ones) with different degrees of freedom? Or at least for variables with the same degree of freedom?
$endgroup$
– Kusavil
Feb 16 '15 at 13:26
1
$begingroup$
If $chi_k^2$ and $chi_m^2$ are independent then $chi_k^2+chi_m^2$ and $chi_{k+m}^2$ have the same distribution.
$endgroup$
– drhab
Feb 16 '15 at 14:21