Why do Fibonacci Digits always return to either 11 or 14?












3












$begingroup$


I recently posed a question on Code Golf on what I'm terming "Fibonacci Digits", where each number is the sum of the previous two digits, not necessarily the previous two numbers. So, for instance, the series beginning $1,1$ is $1,1,2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11,2dots$ and cycles from there.



As I note in the various examples I bring there, unless something in the series manages to add to either $0$ or $14$, the series seems to always loop to some rotation of $2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11$. Further, it always reaches $0$ or $14$ no later than the third entry in the series. For instance, $S_1=7,7,14,5,9dots$, $S_2=14,5,9dots$, $S_3=68,14,5,9dots$.



In other words, it seems that for $0le(a,b)le9$, then, for $a+b=c$:




  1. If $c<10$, let $d=b+c$

  2. If $cge10$, $c=10x+y$ for some integers $0le(x,y)le9$. Let $d=x+y$.

  3. Repeat the above using $c$ and $d$.


Eventually, assuming that you don't start with $0$, this algorithm will yield either $11$ or $14$. Seemingly.



My question is two parts:




  1. Is my assessment correct?

  2. If so, why?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your example of the loop shows that it can avoid $14$. How can you get $0$ unless you start with $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 9 at 16:01










  • $begingroup$
    If I do not miss something, it is sufficient to show the claim for every pair $(a,b)$ with $a,ble 18$. Have you checked this ? When $14$ must occur, is another question.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 9 at 16:19












  • $begingroup$
    @RossMillikan That's it, as far as I can tell. Assuming that $a,b$ aren't both $0$, the cycle always finds its way to $11$ or $14$.
    $endgroup$
    – DonielF
    Jan 9 at 16:23










  • $begingroup$
    I have shown that is correct, but $14$ can occur as late as the sixth position. I didn't look at how late $11$ can come up, but it is later than that.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 9 at 16:25










  • $begingroup$
    @RossMillikan I'm curious, for what input does $14$ come up so late?
    $endgroup$
    – DonielF
    Jan 9 at 16:25
















3












$begingroup$


I recently posed a question on Code Golf on what I'm terming "Fibonacci Digits", where each number is the sum of the previous two digits, not necessarily the previous two numbers. So, for instance, the series beginning $1,1$ is $1,1,2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11,2dots$ and cycles from there.



As I note in the various examples I bring there, unless something in the series manages to add to either $0$ or $14$, the series seems to always loop to some rotation of $2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11$. Further, it always reaches $0$ or $14$ no later than the third entry in the series. For instance, $S_1=7,7,14,5,9dots$, $S_2=14,5,9dots$, $S_3=68,14,5,9dots$.



In other words, it seems that for $0le(a,b)le9$, then, for $a+b=c$:




  1. If $c<10$, let $d=b+c$

  2. If $cge10$, $c=10x+y$ for some integers $0le(x,y)le9$. Let $d=x+y$.

  3. Repeat the above using $c$ and $d$.


Eventually, assuming that you don't start with $0$, this algorithm will yield either $11$ or $14$. Seemingly.



My question is two parts:




  1. Is my assessment correct?

  2. If so, why?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your example of the loop shows that it can avoid $14$. How can you get $0$ unless you start with $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 9 at 16:01










  • $begingroup$
    If I do not miss something, it is sufficient to show the claim for every pair $(a,b)$ with $a,ble 18$. Have you checked this ? When $14$ must occur, is another question.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 9 at 16:19












  • $begingroup$
    @RossMillikan That's it, as far as I can tell. Assuming that $a,b$ aren't both $0$, the cycle always finds its way to $11$ or $14$.
    $endgroup$
    – DonielF
    Jan 9 at 16:23










  • $begingroup$
    I have shown that is correct, but $14$ can occur as late as the sixth position. I didn't look at how late $11$ can come up, but it is later than that.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 9 at 16:25










  • $begingroup$
    @RossMillikan I'm curious, for what input does $14$ come up so late?
    $endgroup$
    – DonielF
    Jan 9 at 16:25














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


I recently posed a question on Code Golf on what I'm terming "Fibonacci Digits", where each number is the sum of the previous two digits, not necessarily the previous two numbers. So, for instance, the series beginning $1,1$ is $1,1,2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11,2dots$ and cycles from there.



As I note in the various examples I bring there, unless something in the series manages to add to either $0$ or $14$, the series seems to always loop to some rotation of $2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11$. Further, it always reaches $0$ or $14$ no later than the third entry in the series. For instance, $S_1=7,7,14,5,9dots$, $S_2=14,5,9dots$, $S_3=68,14,5,9dots$.



In other words, it seems that for $0le(a,b)le9$, then, for $a+b=c$:




  1. If $c<10$, let $d=b+c$

  2. If $cge10$, $c=10x+y$ for some integers $0le(x,y)le9$. Let $d=x+y$.

  3. Repeat the above using $c$ and $d$.


Eventually, assuming that you don't start with $0$, this algorithm will yield either $11$ or $14$. Seemingly.



My question is two parts:




  1. Is my assessment correct?

  2. If so, why?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I recently posed a question on Code Golf on what I'm terming "Fibonacci Digits", where each number is the sum of the previous two digits, not necessarily the previous two numbers. So, for instance, the series beginning $1,1$ is $1,1,2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11,2dots$ and cycles from there.



As I note in the various examples I bring there, unless something in the series manages to add to either $0$ or $14$, the series seems to always loop to some rotation of $2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11$. Further, it always reaches $0$ or $14$ no later than the third entry in the series. For instance, $S_1=7,7,14,5,9dots$, $S_2=14,5,9dots$, $S_3=68,14,5,9dots$.



In other words, it seems that for $0le(a,b)le9$, then, for $a+b=c$:




  1. If $c<10$, let $d=b+c$

  2. If $cge10$, $c=10x+y$ for some integers $0le(x,y)le9$. Let $d=x+y$.

  3. Repeat the above using $c$ and $d$.


Eventually, assuming that you don't start with $0$, this algorithm will yield either $11$ or $14$. Seemingly.



My question is two parts:




  1. Is my assessment correct?

  2. If so, why?







arithmetic integers






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 9 at 15:45









DonielFDonielF

515515




515515








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your example of the loop shows that it can avoid $14$. How can you get $0$ unless you start with $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 9 at 16:01










  • $begingroup$
    If I do not miss something, it is sufficient to show the claim for every pair $(a,b)$ with $a,ble 18$. Have you checked this ? When $14$ must occur, is another question.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 9 at 16:19












  • $begingroup$
    @RossMillikan That's it, as far as I can tell. Assuming that $a,b$ aren't both $0$, the cycle always finds its way to $11$ or $14$.
    $endgroup$
    – DonielF
    Jan 9 at 16:23










  • $begingroup$
    I have shown that is correct, but $14$ can occur as late as the sixth position. I didn't look at how late $11$ can come up, but it is later than that.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 9 at 16:25










  • $begingroup$
    @RossMillikan I'm curious, for what input does $14$ come up so late?
    $endgroup$
    – DonielF
    Jan 9 at 16:25














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your example of the loop shows that it can avoid $14$. How can you get $0$ unless you start with $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 9 at 16:01










  • $begingroup$
    If I do not miss something, it is sufficient to show the claim for every pair $(a,b)$ with $a,ble 18$. Have you checked this ? When $14$ must occur, is another question.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 9 at 16:19












  • $begingroup$
    @RossMillikan That's it, as far as I can tell. Assuming that $a,b$ aren't both $0$, the cycle always finds its way to $11$ or $14$.
    $endgroup$
    – DonielF
    Jan 9 at 16:23










  • $begingroup$
    I have shown that is correct, but $14$ can occur as late as the sixth position. I didn't look at how late $11$ can come up, but it is later than that.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 9 at 16:25










  • $begingroup$
    @RossMillikan I'm curious, for what input does $14$ come up so late?
    $endgroup$
    – DonielF
    Jan 9 at 16:25








1




1




$begingroup$
Your example of the loop shows that it can avoid $14$. How can you get $0$ unless you start with $0$?
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 9 at 16:01




$begingroup$
Your example of the loop shows that it can avoid $14$. How can you get $0$ unless you start with $0$?
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 9 at 16:01












$begingroup$
If I do not miss something, it is sufficient to show the claim for every pair $(a,b)$ with $a,ble 18$. Have you checked this ? When $14$ must occur, is another question.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Jan 9 at 16:19






$begingroup$
If I do not miss something, it is sufficient to show the claim for every pair $(a,b)$ with $a,ble 18$. Have you checked this ? When $14$ must occur, is another question.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Jan 9 at 16:19














$begingroup$
@RossMillikan That's it, as far as I can tell. Assuming that $a,b$ aren't both $0$, the cycle always finds its way to $11$ or $14$.
$endgroup$
– DonielF
Jan 9 at 16:23




$begingroup$
@RossMillikan That's it, as far as I can tell. Assuming that $a,b$ aren't both $0$, the cycle always finds its way to $11$ or $14$.
$endgroup$
– DonielF
Jan 9 at 16:23












$begingroup$
I have shown that is correct, but $14$ can occur as late as the sixth position. I didn't look at how late $11$ can come up, but it is later than that.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 9 at 16:25




$begingroup$
I have shown that is correct, but $14$ can occur as late as the sixth position. I didn't look at how late $11$ can come up, but it is later than that.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 9 at 16:25












$begingroup$
@RossMillikan I'm curious, for what input does $14$ come up so late?
$endgroup$
– DonielF
Jan 9 at 16:25




$begingroup$
@RossMillikan I'm curious, for what input does $14$ come up so late?
$endgroup$
– DonielF
Jan 9 at 16:25










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

I'll assume you do not allow negative starting values (it makes sense not to, since we're interested in digits).



Let's start with the second question: Why are 0 and 14 always reached early?



Let's start with 14. How can we reach 14? Let's start with 14, and reconstruct the sequence backwards, digit by digit.



The only two-digit numbers possible are $10$ to $18$, so we need to take care of the case of having two-digit numbers only if the digit-by-digit reconstruction generates a one after a digit 0-8 (remember, we're reconstructing backwards).





  • $14, 9, 5, 4, 1$. This makes two options


    • The 4, 1 actually comes from 14 (backwards), so the forward sequence is $14, 5, 9, 14$ and we're already in a cycle.

    • The sequence is $14, 9, 5, 4, 1, 3$. We can't continue beyond the 3 unless we allow negative numbers.




  • $14, 8, 6, 2, 4$. We can't proceed without allowing negative numbers.

  • $14, 7, 7, 0, 7$

  • $14, 6, 8$

  • $14, 5, 9$


So 14 can't come later than position 6.



The only way to get 0 is if you start with 0, 0. Otherwise you can get 10, but then you have 10, 1, 1, 2, and you get into the standard sequence.



Now, to the first question. Again, we have only 9 possible 2-digit numbers that we can reach, so we can easily confirm that each eventually sends us to the standard sequence $1, 1, 2, dots$:




  • $10, 1, 1$


  • $11$ done :)


  • $12$ done :)

  • $13, 4, 7, 11$

  • $15, 6, 11$


  • $16, 7, 13$ and we know $13$ sends us to 11


  • $17, 8, 15$ and we know $15$ sends us to 11


  • $18, 9, 17$ and we already know 17


  • $19, 10, 1, 1$.


Now, this brute force check is simple enough, but it's boring. That said, there is some intuition behind why (almost) all Fibonacci digit sequences eventually send us to the standard sequence 1, 1, 2... And it's because 10 and 11 send us there. If you consider sums of digits, then there's only 1 way to get 0: 0 + 0. Similarly, we have only 1 way to get 19. However, we many more ways to get 10 and 11 as a sum of two digits. In fact, if you take 2 random digits, the most likely outcome is 10, followed shortly by 11 (and 9). So, eventually, you're very likely to reach either 10 or 11.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    From the second entry on, no entry can be larger than $9+9=18$. As an entry only depends on the previous two entries, there must be one or more cycles that can be created. I have found $(2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11)$, $(5,9,14)$, and $0$ as cycles. We can just try all $100$ pairs of single digits to start the sequence. Starting with a two digit number is the same as starting with the two individual digits, so we don't have to try that.



    $0$ only comes from starting $(0,0)$
    $5,9,14$ comes from $ (0,7),(1,4),(2,6),(3,1),(4,2),(4,5),(5,9),(6,8),(7,0),(7,7),(8,6),(9,5)$

    Note that $(3,1)$ only gets to $14$ at the sixth term.

    All other starting pairs go to $2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11$ eventually. The latest $11$ comes up is the sixteenth term starting from $(0,2)$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067588%2fwhy-do-fibonacci-digits-always-return-to-either-11-or-14%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0












      $begingroup$

      I'll assume you do not allow negative starting values (it makes sense not to, since we're interested in digits).



      Let's start with the second question: Why are 0 and 14 always reached early?



      Let's start with 14. How can we reach 14? Let's start with 14, and reconstruct the sequence backwards, digit by digit.



      The only two-digit numbers possible are $10$ to $18$, so we need to take care of the case of having two-digit numbers only if the digit-by-digit reconstruction generates a one after a digit 0-8 (remember, we're reconstructing backwards).





      • $14, 9, 5, 4, 1$. This makes two options


        • The 4, 1 actually comes from 14 (backwards), so the forward sequence is $14, 5, 9, 14$ and we're already in a cycle.

        • The sequence is $14, 9, 5, 4, 1, 3$. We can't continue beyond the 3 unless we allow negative numbers.




      • $14, 8, 6, 2, 4$. We can't proceed without allowing negative numbers.

      • $14, 7, 7, 0, 7$

      • $14, 6, 8$

      • $14, 5, 9$


      So 14 can't come later than position 6.



      The only way to get 0 is if you start with 0, 0. Otherwise you can get 10, but then you have 10, 1, 1, 2, and you get into the standard sequence.



      Now, to the first question. Again, we have only 9 possible 2-digit numbers that we can reach, so we can easily confirm that each eventually sends us to the standard sequence $1, 1, 2, dots$:




      • $10, 1, 1$


      • $11$ done :)


      • $12$ done :)

      • $13, 4, 7, 11$

      • $15, 6, 11$


      • $16, 7, 13$ and we know $13$ sends us to 11


      • $17, 8, 15$ and we know $15$ sends us to 11


      • $18, 9, 17$ and we already know 17


      • $19, 10, 1, 1$.


      Now, this brute force check is simple enough, but it's boring. That said, there is some intuition behind why (almost) all Fibonacci digit sequences eventually send us to the standard sequence 1, 1, 2... And it's because 10 and 11 send us there. If you consider sums of digits, then there's only 1 way to get 0: 0 + 0. Similarly, we have only 1 way to get 19. However, we many more ways to get 10 and 11 as a sum of two digits. In fact, if you take 2 random digits, the most likely outcome is 10, followed shortly by 11 (and 9). So, eventually, you're very likely to reach either 10 or 11.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        0












        $begingroup$

        I'll assume you do not allow negative starting values (it makes sense not to, since we're interested in digits).



        Let's start with the second question: Why are 0 and 14 always reached early?



        Let's start with 14. How can we reach 14? Let's start with 14, and reconstruct the sequence backwards, digit by digit.



        The only two-digit numbers possible are $10$ to $18$, so we need to take care of the case of having two-digit numbers only if the digit-by-digit reconstruction generates a one after a digit 0-8 (remember, we're reconstructing backwards).





        • $14, 9, 5, 4, 1$. This makes two options


          • The 4, 1 actually comes from 14 (backwards), so the forward sequence is $14, 5, 9, 14$ and we're already in a cycle.

          • The sequence is $14, 9, 5, 4, 1, 3$. We can't continue beyond the 3 unless we allow negative numbers.




        • $14, 8, 6, 2, 4$. We can't proceed without allowing negative numbers.

        • $14, 7, 7, 0, 7$

        • $14, 6, 8$

        • $14, 5, 9$


        So 14 can't come later than position 6.



        The only way to get 0 is if you start with 0, 0. Otherwise you can get 10, but then you have 10, 1, 1, 2, and you get into the standard sequence.



        Now, to the first question. Again, we have only 9 possible 2-digit numbers that we can reach, so we can easily confirm that each eventually sends us to the standard sequence $1, 1, 2, dots$:




        • $10, 1, 1$


        • $11$ done :)


        • $12$ done :)

        • $13, 4, 7, 11$

        • $15, 6, 11$


        • $16, 7, 13$ and we know $13$ sends us to 11


        • $17, 8, 15$ and we know $15$ sends us to 11


        • $18, 9, 17$ and we already know 17


        • $19, 10, 1, 1$.


        Now, this brute force check is simple enough, but it's boring. That said, there is some intuition behind why (almost) all Fibonacci digit sequences eventually send us to the standard sequence 1, 1, 2... And it's because 10 and 11 send us there. If you consider sums of digits, then there's only 1 way to get 0: 0 + 0. Similarly, we have only 1 way to get 19. However, we many more ways to get 10 and 11 as a sum of two digits. In fact, if you take 2 random digits, the most likely outcome is 10, followed shortly by 11 (and 9). So, eventually, you're very likely to reach either 10 or 11.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          I'll assume you do not allow negative starting values (it makes sense not to, since we're interested in digits).



          Let's start with the second question: Why are 0 and 14 always reached early?



          Let's start with 14. How can we reach 14? Let's start with 14, and reconstruct the sequence backwards, digit by digit.



          The only two-digit numbers possible are $10$ to $18$, so we need to take care of the case of having two-digit numbers only if the digit-by-digit reconstruction generates a one after a digit 0-8 (remember, we're reconstructing backwards).





          • $14, 9, 5, 4, 1$. This makes two options


            • The 4, 1 actually comes from 14 (backwards), so the forward sequence is $14, 5, 9, 14$ and we're already in a cycle.

            • The sequence is $14, 9, 5, 4, 1, 3$. We can't continue beyond the 3 unless we allow negative numbers.




          • $14, 8, 6, 2, 4$. We can't proceed without allowing negative numbers.

          • $14, 7, 7, 0, 7$

          • $14, 6, 8$

          • $14, 5, 9$


          So 14 can't come later than position 6.



          The only way to get 0 is if you start with 0, 0. Otherwise you can get 10, but then you have 10, 1, 1, 2, and you get into the standard sequence.



          Now, to the first question. Again, we have only 9 possible 2-digit numbers that we can reach, so we can easily confirm that each eventually sends us to the standard sequence $1, 1, 2, dots$:




          • $10, 1, 1$


          • $11$ done :)


          • $12$ done :)

          • $13, 4, 7, 11$

          • $15, 6, 11$


          • $16, 7, 13$ and we know $13$ sends us to 11


          • $17, 8, 15$ and we know $15$ sends us to 11


          • $18, 9, 17$ and we already know 17


          • $19, 10, 1, 1$.


          Now, this brute force check is simple enough, but it's boring. That said, there is some intuition behind why (almost) all Fibonacci digit sequences eventually send us to the standard sequence 1, 1, 2... And it's because 10 and 11 send us there. If you consider sums of digits, then there's only 1 way to get 0: 0 + 0. Similarly, we have only 1 way to get 19. However, we many more ways to get 10 and 11 as a sum of two digits. In fact, if you take 2 random digits, the most likely outcome is 10, followed shortly by 11 (and 9). So, eventually, you're very likely to reach either 10 or 11.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I'll assume you do not allow negative starting values (it makes sense not to, since we're interested in digits).



          Let's start with the second question: Why are 0 and 14 always reached early?



          Let's start with 14. How can we reach 14? Let's start with 14, and reconstruct the sequence backwards, digit by digit.



          The only two-digit numbers possible are $10$ to $18$, so we need to take care of the case of having two-digit numbers only if the digit-by-digit reconstruction generates a one after a digit 0-8 (remember, we're reconstructing backwards).





          • $14, 9, 5, 4, 1$. This makes two options


            • The 4, 1 actually comes from 14 (backwards), so the forward sequence is $14, 5, 9, 14$ and we're already in a cycle.

            • The sequence is $14, 9, 5, 4, 1, 3$. We can't continue beyond the 3 unless we allow negative numbers.




          • $14, 8, 6, 2, 4$. We can't proceed without allowing negative numbers.

          • $14, 7, 7, 0, 7$

          • $14, 6, 8$

          • $14, 5, 9$


          So 14 can't come later than position 6.



          The only way to get 0 is if you start with 0, 0. Otherwise you can get 10, but then you have 10, 1, 1, 2, and you get into the standard sequence.



          Now, to the first question. Again, we have only 9 possible 2-digit numbers that we can reach, so we can easily confirm that each eventually sends us to the standard sequence $1, 1, 2, dots$:




          • $10, 1, 1$


          • $11$ done :)


          • $12$ done :)

          • $13, 4, 7, 11$

          • $15, 6, 11$


          • $16, 7, 13$ and we know $13$ sends us to 11


          • $17, 8, 15$ and we know $15$ sends us to 11


          • $18, 9, 17$ and we already know 17


          • $19, 10, 1, 1$.


          Now, this brute force check is simple enough, but it's boring. That said, there is some intuition behind why (almost) all Fibonacci digit sequences eventually send us to the standard sequence 1, 1, 2... And it's because 10 and 11 send us there. If you consider sums of digits, then there's only 1 way to get 0: 0 + 0. Similarly, we have only 1 way to get 19. However, we many more ways to get 10 and 11 as a sum of two digits. In fact, if you take 2 random digits, the most likely outcome is 10, followed shortly by 11 (and 9). So, eventually, you're very likely to reach either 10 or 11.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 9 at 16:25









          Todor MarkovTodor Markov

          2,410412




          2,410412























              0












              $begingroup$

              From the second entry on, no entry can be larger than $9+9=18$. As an entry only depends on the previous two entries, there must be one or more cycles that can be created. I have found $(2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11)$, $(5,9,14)$, and $0$ as cycles. We can just try all $100$ pairs of single digits to start the sequence. Starting with a two digit number is the same as starting with the two individual digits, so we don't have to try that.



              $0$ only comes from starting $(0,0)$
              $5,9,14$ comes from $ (0,7),(1,4),(2,6),(3,1),(4,2),(4,5),(5,9),(6,8),(7,0),(7,7),(8,6),(9,5)$

              Note that $(3,1)$ only gets to $14$ at the sixth term.

              All other starting pairs go to $2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11$ eventually. The latest $11$ comes up is the sixteenth term starting from $(0,2)$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                From the second entry on, no entry can be larger than $9+9=18$. As an entry only depends on the previous two entries, there must be one or more cycles that can be created. I have found $(2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11)$, $(5,9,14)$, and $0$ as cycles. We can just try all $100$ pairs of single digits to start the sequence. Starting with a two digit number is the same as starting with the two individual digits, so we don't have to try that.



                $0$ only comes from starting $(0,0)$
                $5,9,14$ comes from $ (0,7),(1,4),(2,6),(3,1),(4,2),(4,5),(5,9),(6,8),(7,0),(7,7),(8,6),(9,5)$

                Note that $(3,1)$ only gets to $14$ at the sixth term.

                All other starting pairs go to $2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11$ eventually. The latest $11$ comes up is the sixteenth term starting from $(0,2)$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  From the second entry on, no entry can be larger than $9+9=18$. As an entry only depends on the previous two entries, there must be one or more cycles that can be created. I have found $(2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11)$, $(5,9,14)$, and $0$ as cycles. We can just try all $100$ pairs of single digits to start the sequence. Starting with a two digit number is the same as starting with the two individual digits, so we don't have to try that.



                  $0$ only comes from starting $(0,0)$
                  $5,9,14$ comes from $ (0,7),(1,4),(2,6),(3,1),(4,2),(4,5),(5,9),(6,8),(7,0),(7,7),(8,6),(9,5)$

                  Note that $(3,1)$ only gets to $14$ at the sixth term.

                  All other starting pairs go to $2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11$ eventually. The latest $11$ comes up is the sixteenth term starting from $(0,2)$






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  From the second entry on, no entry can be larger than $9+9=18$. As an entry only depends on the previous two entries, there must be one or more cycles that can be created. I have found $(2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11)$, $(5,9,14)$, and $0$ as cycles. We can just try all $100$ pairs of single digits to start the sequence. Starting with a two digit number is the same as starting with the two individual digits, so we don't have to try that.



                  $0$ only comes from starting $(0,0)$
                  $5,9,14$ comes from $ (0,7),(1,4),(2,6),(3,1),(4,2),(4,5),(5,9),(6,8),(7,0),(7,7),(8,6),(9,5)$

                  Note that $(3,1)$ only gets to $14$ at the sixth term.

                  All other starting pairs go to $2,3,5,8,13,4,7,11$ eventually. The latest $11$ comes up is the sixteenth term starting from $(0,2)$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 9 at 16:30

























                  answered Jan 9 at 16:20









                  Ross MillikanRoss Millikan

                  297k23198371




                  297k23198371






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067588%2fwhy-do-fibonacci-digits-always-return-to-either-11-or-14%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Human spaceflight

                      Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                      File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg