Laplace Transform of $y^n$












1












$begingroup$


When the Laplace transform of $y$ is denoted $Y(s)$, we have formulas for the derivatives of $y$ without actually knowing what $y$ is. Is there an explicit formula for $y^2$? More generally, $y^n$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you just want the laplace transform of a basic power function, or a something like $y(x)^2$, where it's an entire function taken to a power?
    $endgroup$
    – Calvin Godfrey
    Jan 8 at 3:04










  • $begingroup$
    The entire function taken to a power - sorry if I was unclear.
    $endgroup$
    – Ace Davenport
    Jan 8 at 3:07






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Generally, no..
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 3:30
















1












$begingroup$


When the Laplace transform of $y$ is denoted $Y(s)$, we have formulas for the derivatives of $y$ without actually knowing what $y$ is. Is there an explicit formula for $y^2$? More generally, $y^n$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you just want the laplace transform of a basic power function, or a something like $y(x)^2$, where it's an entire function taken to a power?
    $endgroup$
    – Calvin Godfrey
    Jan 8 at 3:04










  • $begingroup$
    The entire function taken to a power - sorry if I was unclear.
    $endgroup$
    – Ace Davenport
    Jan 8 at 3:07






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Generally, no..
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 3:30














1












1








1





$begingroup$


When the Laplace transform of $y$ is denoted $Y(s)$, we have formulas for the derivatives of $y$ without actually knowing what $y$ is. Is there an explicit formula for $y^2$? More generally, $y^n$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




When the Laplace transform of $y$ is denoted $Y(s)$, we have formulas for the derivatives of $y$ without actually knowing what $y$ is. Is there an explicit formula for $y^2$? More generally, $y^n$?







ordinary-differential-equations laplace-transform






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 8 at 3:02









El borito

668216




668216










asked Jan 8 at 1:50









Ace DavenportAce Davenport

394




394












  • $begingroup$
    Do you just want the laplace transform of a basic power function, or a something like $y(x)^2$, where it's an entire function taken to a power?
    $endgroup$
    – Calvin Godfrey
    Jan 8 at 3:04










  • $begingroup$
    The entire function taken to a power - sorry if I was unclear.
    $endgroup$
    – Ace Davenport
    Jan 8 at 3:07






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Generally, no..
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 3:30


















  • $begingroup$
    Do you just want the laplace transform of a basic power function, or a something like $y(x)^2$, where it's an entire function taken to a power?
    $endgroup$
    – Calvin Godfrey
    Jan 8 at 3:04










  • $begingroup$
    The entire function taken to a power - sorry if I was unclear.
    $endgroup$
    – Ace Davenport
    Jan 8 at 3:07






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Generally, no..
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 3:30
















$begingroup$
Do you just want the laplace transform of a basic power function, or a something like $y(x)^2$, where it's an entire function taken to a power?
$endgroup$
– Calvin Godfrey
Jan 8 at 3:04




$begingroup$
Do you just want the laplace transform of a basic power function, or a something like $y(x)^2$, where it's an entire function taken to a power?
$endgroup$
– Calvin Godfrey
Jan 8 at 3:04












$begingroup$
The entire function taken to a power - sorry if I was unclear.
$endgroup$
– Ace Davenport
Jan 8 at 3:07




$begingroup$
The entire function taken to a power - sorry if I was unclear.
$endgroup$
– Ace Davenport
Jan 8 at 3:07




1




1




$begingroup$
Generally, no..
$endgroup$
– Dylan
Jan 8 at 3:30




$begingroup$
Generally, no..
$endgroup$
– Dylan
Jan 8 at 3:30










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

From this math stackexchange link, it seems there's no quick and easy way to do it. From the Wikipedia page on Laplace transform, it lists how to calculate $mathcal{L}(f(t)g(t))$, in which case you could simply say $f(t)=g(t)$. But the formula deals with the convolution of two functions, namely



$$mathcal{L}(f(t)g(t))=frac{1}{2pi i}lim_{Ttoinfty}int_{c-iT}^{c+iT}F(sigma)G(s-sigma)d,sigma$$



And this integration is done along the vertical line $textrm{Re}(sigma)=c$, where $F(sigma)$ and $G(s-sigma)$ are the Laplace transform of $f(t)$ and $g(t)$, respectively. So it's clear that for an arbitrary function, taking the laplace of $f(t)^n$ is not an easy task.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065720%2flaplace-transform-of-yn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    From this math stackexchange link, it seems there's no quick and easy way to do it. From the Wikipedia page on Laplace transform, it lists how to calculate $mathcal{L}(f(t)g(t))$, in which case you could simply say $f(t)=g(t)$. But the formula deals with the convolution of two functions, namely



    $$mathcal{L}(f(t)g(t))=frac{1}{2pi i}lim_{Ttoinfty}int_{c-iT}^{c+iT}F(sigma)G(s-sigma)d,sigma$$



    And this integration is done along the vertical line $textrm{Re}(sigma)=c$, where $F(sigma)$ and $G(s-sigma)$ are the Laplace transform of $f(t)$ and $g(t)$, respectively. So it's clear that for an arbitrary function, taking the laplace of $f(t)^n$ is not an easy task.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      From this math stackexchange link, it seems there's no quick and easy way to do it. From the Wikipedia page on Laplace transform, it lists how to calculate $mathcal{L}(f(t)g(t))$, in which case you could simply say $f(t)=g(t)$. But the formula deals with the convolution of two functions, namely



      $$mathcal{L}(f(t)g(t))=frac{1}{2pi i}lim_{Ttoinfty}int_{c-iT}^{c+iT}F(sigma)G(s-sigma)d,sigma$$



      And this integration is done along the vertical line $textrm{Re}(sigma)=c$, where $F(sigma)$ and $G(s-sigma)$ are the Laplace transform of $f(t)$ and $g(t)$, respectively. So it's clear that for an arbitrary function, taking the laplace of $f(t)^n$ is not an easy task.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        From this math stackexchange link, it seems there's no quick and easy way to do it. From the Wikipedia page on Laplace transform, it lists how to calculate $mathcal{L}(f(t)g(t))$, in which case you could simply say $f(t)=g(t)$. But the formula deals with the convolution of two functions, namely



        $$mathcal{L}(f(t)g(t))=frac{1}{2pi i}lim_{Ttoinfty}int_{c-iT}^{c+iT}F(sigma)G(s-sigma)d,sigma$$



        And this integration is done along the vertical line $textrm{Re}(sigma)=c$, where $F(sigma)$ and $G(s-sigma)$ are the Laplace transform of $f(t)$ and $g(t)$, respectively. So it's clear that for an arbitrary function, taking the laplace of $f(t)^n$ is not an easy task.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        From this math stackexchange link, it seems there's no quick and easy way to do it. From the Wikipedia page on Laplace transform, it lists how to calculate $mathcal{L}(f(t)g(t))$, in which case you could simply say $f(t)=g(t)$. But the formula deals with the convolution of two functions, namely



        $$mathcal{L}(f(t)g(t))=frac{1}{2pi i}lim_{Ttoinfty}int_{c-iT}^{c+iT}F(sigma)G(s-sigma)d,sigma$$



        And this integration is done along the vertical line $textrm{Re}(sigma)=c$, where $F(sigma)$ and $G(s-sigma)$ are the Laplace transform of $f(t)$ and $g(t)$, respectively. So it's clear that for an arbitrary function, taking the laplace of $f(t)^n$ is not an easy task.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 8 at 3:17









        Calvin GodfreyCalvin Godfrey

        633311




        633311






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065720%2flaplace-transform-of-yn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            張江高科駅