Embedding abelian varieties into projective spaces of small dimension












17












$begingroup$


Given a (complex) abelian variety $A$ of a fixed dimension $g$, let $d(A)$ be the dimension of the smallest complex projective space it embeds into.



Is $d(A)$ uniform over all abelian varieties of a fixed $g$? Or are there special ones that embed into even smaller projective spaces?



Can $d(A)$ be computed explicitly? I am particularly interested in the case $g = 2$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    17












    $begingroup$


    Given a (complex) abelian variety $A$ of a fixed dimension $g$, let $d(A)$ be the dimension of the smallest complex projective space it embeds into.



    Is $d(A)$ uniform over all abelian varieties of a fixed $g$? Or are there special ones that embed into even smaller projective spaces?



    Can $d(A)$ be computed explicitly? I am particularly interested in the case $g = 2$.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      17












      17








      17


      3



      $begingroup$


      Given a (complex) abelian variety $A$ of a fixed dimension $g$, let $d(A)$ be the dimension of the smallest complex projective space it embeds into.



      Is $d(A)$ uniform over all abelian varieties of a fixed $g$? Or are there special ones that embed into even smaller projective spaces?



      Can $d(A)$ be computed explicitly? I am particularly interested in the case $g = 2$.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Given a (complex) abelian variety $A$ of a fixed dimension $g$, let $d(A)$ be the dimension of the smallest complex projective space it embeds into.



      Is $d(A)$ uniform over all abelian varieties of a fixed $g$? Or are there special ones that embed into even smaller projective spaces?



      Can $d(A)$ be computed explicitly? I am particularly interested in the case $g = 2$.







      ag.algebraic-geometry abelian-varieties line-bundles






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 21 at 8:58









      KimKim

      484314




      484314






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          27












          $begingroup$

          Recall that any smooth projective variety of dimension $g$ embeds into $mathbf{P}^{2g+1}$. Consider now an abelian variety $A$ of dimension $g$ which embeds into $mathbf{P}^{2g}$. Van de Ven proves (essentially by applying the self-intersection formula to the normal bundle of $A$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g}$) that the degree of $A$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g}$ is given by ${2g+1choose g}$, and notes that the Riemann-Roch theorem implies that the degree has to be divisible by $g!$. This is possible only if $g=1$ or $g=2$.
          Of course elliptic curves embed into $mathbf{P}^2$. One cannot embed abelian surfaces into $mathbf{P}^3$, and if an abelian surface embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$, then its degree is $10$. Abelian surfaces with this property exist (Mumford-Horrocks surfaces). This is all folklore. Maybe less known is the fact that Comessatti proved in 1919 (see this paper of Lange for a modern account) that for some curves of genus $2$ the Jacobian embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$. More precisely: if $C$ is a curve of genus $2$ and $J(C)$ contains a curve $D$ with self-intersection $2$ and $Ccdot D=3$, then $J(C)$ embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$ (with embedding given by $|C+D|$). But these should also be of the Mumford-Horrocks type (Theorem 5.2 in the paper of Mumford and Horrocks says that any abelian surface in $mathbf{P}^4$ is projectively equivalent to one of theirs).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is it known what is the smallest degree that the image of $mathbf{A}$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g+1}$ can be?
            $endgroup$
            – Kim
            Jan 21 at 23:32












          • $begingroup$
            @Kim Possibly, but not to me.
            $endgroup$
            – Mere Scribe
            Jan 22 at 10:29











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f321368%2fembedding-abelian-varieties-into-projective-spaces-of-small-dimension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          27












          $begingroup$

          Recall that any smooth projective variety of dimension $g$ embeds into $mathbf{P}^{2g+1}$. Consider now an abelian variety $A$ of dimension $g$ which embeds into $mathbf{P}^{2g}$. Van de Ven proves (essentially by applying the self-intersection formula to the normal bundle of $A$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g}$) that the degree of $A$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g}$ is given by ${2g+1choose g}$, and notes that the Riemann-Roch theorem implies that the degree has to be divisible by $g!$. This is possible only if $g=1$ or $g=2$.
          Of course elliptic curves embed into $mathbf{P}^2$. One cannot embed abelian surfaces into $mathbf{P}^3$, and if an abelian surface embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$, then its degree is $10$. Abelian surfaces with this property exist (Mumford-Horrocks surfaces). This is all folklore. Maybe less known is the fact that Comessatti proved in 1919 (see this paper of Lange for a modern account) that for some curves of genus $2$ the Jacobian embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$. More precisely: if $C$ is a curve of genus $2$ and $J(C)$ contains a curve $D$ with self-intersection $2$ and $Ccdot D=3$, then $J(C)$ embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$ (with embedding given by $|C+D|$). But these should also be of the Mumford-Horrocks type (Theorem 5.2 in the paper of Mumford and Horrocks says that any abelian surface in $mathbf{P}^4$ is projectively equivalent to one of theirs).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is it known what is the smallest degree that the image of $mathbf{A}$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g+1}$ can be?
            $endgroup$
            – Kim
            Jan 21 at 23:32












          • $begingroup$
            @Kim Possibly, but not to me.
            $endgroup$
            – Mere Scribe
            Jan 22 at 10:29
















          27












          $begingroup$

          Recall that any smooth projective variety of dimension $g$ embeds into $mathbf{P}^{2g+1}$. Consider now an abelian variety $A$ of dimension $g$ which embeds into $mathbf{P}^{2g}$. Van de Ven proves (essentially by applying the self-intersection formula to the normal bundle of $A$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g}$) that the degree of $A$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g}$ is given by ${2g+1choose g}$, and notes that the Riemann-Roch theorem implies that the degree has to be divisible by $g!$. This is possible only if $g=1$ or $g=2$.
          Of course elliptic curves embed into $mathbf{P}^2$. One cannot embed abelian surfaces into $mathbf{P}^3$, and if an abelian surface embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$, then its degree is $10$. Abelian surfaces with this property exist (Mumford-Horrocks surfaces). This is all folklore. Maybe less known is the fact that Comessatti proved in 1919 (see this paper of Lange for a modern account) that for some curves of genus $2$ the Jacobian embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$. More precisely: if $C$ is a curve of genus $2$ and $J(C)$ contains a curve $D$ with self-intersection $2$ and $Ccdot D=3$, then $J(C)$ embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$ (with embedding given by $|C+D|$). But these should also be of the Mumford-Horrocks type (Theorem 5.2 in the paper of Mumford and Horrocks says that any abelian surface in $mathbf{P}^4$ is projectively equivalent to one of theirs).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is it known what is the smallest degree that the image of $mathbf{A}$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g+1}$ can be?
            $endgroup$
            – Kim
            Jan 21 at 23:32












          • $begingroup$
            @Kim Possibly, but not to me.
            $endgroup$
            – Mere Scribe
            Jan 22 at 10:29














          27












          27








          27





          $begingroup$

          Recall that any smooth projective variety of dimension $g$ embeds into $mathbf{P}^{2g+1}$. Consider now an abelian variety $A$ of dimension $g$ which embeds into $mathbf{P}^{2g}$. Van de Ven proves (essentially by applying the self-intersection formula to the normal bundle of $A$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g}$) that the degree of $A$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g}$ is given by ${2g+1choose g}$, and notes that the Riemann-Roch theorem implies that the degree has to be divisible by $g!$. This is possible only if $g=1$ or $g=2$.
          Of course elliptic curves embed into $mathbf{P}^2$. One cannot embed abelian surfaces into $mathbf{P}^3$, and if an abelian surface embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$, then its degree is $10$. Abelian surfaces with this property exist (Mumford-Horrocks surfaces). This is all folklore. Maybe less known is the fact that Comessatti proved in 1919 (see this paper of Lange for a modern account) that for some curves of genus $2$ the Jacobian embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$. More precisely: if $C$ is a curve of genus $2$ and $J(C)$ contains a curve $D$ with self-intersection $2$ and $Ccdot D=3$, then $J(C)$ embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$ (with embedding given by $|C+D|$). But these should also be of the Mumford-Horrocks type (Theorem 5.2 in the paper of Mumford and Horrocks says that any abelian surface in $mathbf{P}^4$ is projectively equivalent to one of theirs).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Recall that any smooth projective variety of dimension $g$ embeds into $mathbf{P}^{2g+1}$. Consider now an abelian variety $A$ of dimension $g$ which embeds into $mathbf{P}^{2g}$. Van de Ven proves (essentially by applying the self-intersection formula to the normal bundle of $A$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g}$) that the degree of $A$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g}$ is given by ${2g+1choose g}$, and notes that the Riemann-Roch theorem implies that the degree has to be divisible by $g!$. This is possible only if $g=1$ or $g=2$.
          Of course elliptic curves embed into $mathbf{P}^2$. One cannot embed abelian surfaces into $mathbf{P}^3$, and if an abelian surface embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$, then its degree is $10$. Abelian surfaces with this property exist (Mumford-Horrocks surfaces). This is all folklore. Maybe less known is the fact that Comessatti proved in 1919 (see this paper of Lange for a modern account) that for some curves of genus $2$ the Jacobian embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$. More precisely: if $C$ is a curve of genus $2$ and $J(C)$ contains a curve $D$ with self-intersection $2$ and $Ccdot D=3$, then $J(C)$ embeds into $mathbf{P}^4$ (with embedding given by $|C+D|$). But these should also be of the Mumford-Horrocks type (Theorem 5.2 in the paper of Mumford and Horrocks says that any abelian surface in $mathbf{P}^4$ is projectively equivalent to one of theirs).







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 21 at 11:55

























          answered Jan 21 at 10:10









          Mere ScribeMere Scribe

          6721819




          6721819












          • $begingroup$
            Is it known what is the smallest degree that the image of $mathbf{A}$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g+1}$ can be?
            $endgroup$
            – Kim
            Jan 21 at 23:32












          • $begingroup$
            @Kim Possibly, but not to me.
            $endgroup$
            – Mere Scribe
            Jan 22 at 10:29


















          • $begingroup$
            Is it known what is the smallest degree that the image of $mathbf{A}$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g+1}$ can be?
            $endgroup$
            – Kim
            Jan 21 at 23:32












          • $begingroup$
            @Kim Possibly, but not to me.
            $endgroup$
            – Mere Scribe
            Jan 22 at 10:29
















          $begingroup$
          Is it known what is the smallest degree that the image of $mathbf{A}$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g+1}$ can be?
          $endgroup$
          – Kim
          Jan 21 at 23:32






          $begingroup$
          Is it known what is the smallest degree that the image of $mathbf{A}$ in $mathbf{P}^{2g+1}$ can be?
          $endgroup$
          – Kim
          Jan 21 at 23:32














          $begingroup$
          @Kim Possibly, but not to me.
          $endgroup$
          – Mere Scribe
          Jan 22 at 10:29




          $begingroup$
          @Kim Possibly, but not to me.
          $endgroup$
          – Mere Scribe
          Jan 22 at 10:29


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f321368%2fembedding-abelian-varieties-into-projective-spaces-of-small-dimension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Human spaceflight

          Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

          張江高科駅