How do I apply Law of Large Numbers in this question
$begingroup$
Let $K_{0}=1$, and in every round $i =1,...,n$ a player puts all capital $K_{i-1}$ in. A fair coin is thrown. If it falls on Heads he receives $frac{5}{3}$ of his capital outlay, if it falls on Tails then $frac{1}{3}$ of his capital outlay is returned to him.
$1.$ Show $mathbb E[K_{n}]=1$
$2. K_{n} to 0$ a.s., where $n to infty$
Ideas:
$1.$ I am open to corrections, but I think this is fairly straightforward, perhaps even inductive?
$mathbb E[K_{1}]=frac{1}{2}frac{5}{3}K_{0}+frac{1}{2}frac{1}{3}K_{0}=1$
and it goes on $mathbb E[K_{i}]=frac{1}{2}frac{5}{3}E[K_{i-1}]+frac{1}{2}frac{1}{3}E[K_{i-1}]=mathbb E[X_{i-1}]$
Does this suffice?
$2.$
Because we need to show $K_{n} to 0$ a.s., $n to infty$ I assume we need to use the law of large numbers
The only problem is:
$sum_{i=1}^{n}frac{K_{n}}{n}to mathbb E[X_{1}]$, a.s. but as proven in $1.$ $mathbb E[X_{1}]=1$
Oh yes but of course, it is plain to see that $(K_{n})_{n}$ are not independent random variables, and therefore I need to find some smart way to "create" random variables that are independent yet involve $K_{n}$ in order to apply the law of large numbers.
Any ideas/assistance?
real-analysis probability probability-theory random-variables expected-value
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $K_{0}=1$, and in every round $i =1,...,n$ a player puts all capital $K_{i-1}$ in. A fair coin is thrown. If it falls on Heads he receives $frac{5}{3}$ of his capital outlay, if it falls on Tails then $frac{1}{3}$ of his capital outlay is returned to him.
$1.$ Show $mathbb E[K_{n}]=1$
$2. K_{n} to 0$ a.s., where $n to infty$
Ideas:
$1.$ I am open to corrections, but I think this is fairly straightforward, perhaps even inductive?
$mathbb E[K_{1}]=frac{1}{2}frac{5}{3}K_{0}+frac{1}{2}frac{1}{3}K_{0}=1$
and it goes on $mathbb E[K_{i}]=frac{1}{2}frac{5}{3}E[K_{i-1}]+frac{1}{2}frac{1}{3}E[K_{i-1}]=mathbb E[X_{i-1}]$
Does this suffice?
$2.$
Because we need to show $K_{n} to 0$ a.s., $n to infty$ I assume we need to use the law of large numbers
The only problem is:
$sum_{i=1}^{n}frac{K_{n}}{n}to mathbb E[X_{1}]$, a.s. but as proven in $1.$ $mathbb E[X_{1}]=1$
Oh yes but of course, it is plain to see that $(K_{n})_{n}$ are not independent random variables, and therefore I need to find some smart way to "create" random variables that are independent yet involve $K_{n}$ in order to apply the law of large numbers.
Any ideas/assistance?
real-analysis probability probability-theory random-variables expected-value
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $K_{0}=1$, and in every round $i =1,...,n$ a player puts all capital $K_{i-1}$ in. A fair coin is thrown. If it falls on Heads he receives $frac{5}{3}$ of his capital outlay, if it falls on Tails then $frac{1}{3}$ of his capital outlay is returned to him.
$1.$ Show $mathbb E[K_{n}]=1$
$2. K_{n} to 0$ a.s., where $n to infty$
Ideas:
$1.$ I am open to corrections, but I think this is fairly straightforward, perhaps even inductive?
$mathbb E[K_{1}]=frac{1}{2}frac{5}{3}K_{0}+frac{1}{2}frac{1}{3}K_{0}=1$
and it goes on $mathbb E[K_{i}]=frac{1}{2}frac{5}{3}E[K_{i-1}]+frac{1}{2}frac{1}{3}E[K_{i-1}]=mathbb E[X_{i-1}]$
Does this suffice?
$2.$
Because we need to show $K_{n} to 0$ a.s., $n to infty$ I assume we need to use the law of large numbers
The only problem is:
$sum_{i=1}^{n}frac{K_{n}}{n}to mathbb E[X_{1}]$, a.s. but as proven in $1.$ $mathbb E[X_{1}]=1$
Oh yes but of course, it is plain to see that $(K_{n})_{n}$ are not independent random variables, and therefore I need to find some smart way to "create" random variables that are independent yet involve $K_{n}$ in order to apply the law of large numbers.
Any ideas/assistance?
real-analysis probability probability-theory random-variables expected-value
$endgroup$
Let $K_{0}=1$, and in every round $i =1,...,n$ a player puts all capital $K_{i-1}$ in. A fair coin is thrown. If it falls on Heads he receives $frac{5}{3}$ of his capital outlay, if it falls on Tails then $frac{1}{3}$ of his capital outlay is returned to him.
$1.$ Show $mathbb E[K_{n}]=1$
$2. K_{n} to 0$ a.s., where $n to infty$
Ideas:
$1.$ I am open to corrections, but I think this is fairly straightforward, perhaps even inductive?
$mathbb E[K_{1}]=frac{1}{2}frac{5}{3}K_{0}+frac{1}{2}frac{1}{3}K_{0}=1$
and it goes on $mathbb E[K_{i}]=frac{1}{2}frac{5}{3}E[K_{i-1}]+frac{1}{2}frac{1}{3}E[K_{i-1}]=mathbb E[X_{i-1}]$
Does this suffice?
$2.$
Because we need to show $K_{n} to 0$ a.s., $n to infty$ I assume we need to use the law of large numbers
The only problem is:
$sum_{i=1}^{n}frac{K_{n}}{n}to mathbb E[X_{1}]$, a.s. but as proven in $1.$ $mathbb E[X_{1}]=1$
Oh yes but of course, it is plain to see that $(K_{n})_{n}$ are not independent random variables, and therefore I need to find some smart way to "create" random variables that are independent yet involve $K_{n}$ in order to apply the law of large numbers.
Any ideas/assistance?
real-analysis probability probability-theory random-variables expected-value
real-analysis probability probability-theory random-variables expected-value
asked Jan 8 at 1:18
SABOYSABOY
694311
694311
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In this game, what is independent is the rate of the return $frac{K_{n}}{K_{n-1}}$. And it is a function of $X_n$, the result of the $n$-th round coin toss, $X_n = 1$ if coin falls in head and $0$ otherwise. We can see that $frac{K_{n}}{K_{n-1}} = left(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_n}$ and
$$
K_n = 1cdotleft(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_1}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_1}cdotsleft(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_n}=left(frac{5}{3}right)^{S_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{n-S_n}
$$ where $S_n= sum_{j=1}^n X_j$ is the total number of heads until the $n$-th round. Take log on both sides and we have
$$
frac{1}{n}log K_n = frac{S_n}{n}logleft(frac{5}{3}right)+left(1-frac{S_n}{n}right)logleft(frac{1}{3}right).
$$ Strong law of large numbers implies $frac{S_n}{n}to E[X_1] =frac{1}{2}$ almost surely. Thus, it holds
$$
frac{1}{n}log K_n to frac{1}{2}logleft(frac{5}{9}right)=c<0.
$$ It says that $K_n^{frac{1}{n}}to e^c <1 $ and hence $K_n to 0$ almost surely.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you, but why is the rate of return independent, surely it depends on $K_{i}-1$ in the formula $Y_{i}:=frac{K_{i}}{K_{i-1}}$ and similarly $K_{i-1}$ is present in $Y_{i-1}:=frac{K_{i-1}}{K_{i-2}}$
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Jan 8 at 9:38
$begingroup$
Well, yes it's true that $Y_i=frac{K_i}{K_{i-1}}$ contains $K_{i-1}$ in the expression. But it is also true that $Y_i$ and $K_{i-1}$ are independent. Why the previous fact does not contradict the latter independence statement? The reason is that $Y_i$ only depends on the $i$-th round coin toss $X_i$, which is (intuitively) independent of $K_{i-1}$. On the other hand, $K_i$ is a variable dependent on the previous asset $K_{i-1}$. This dependence is eliminated by factoring $K_i$ by $K_{i-1}$. This (which is equivalent to take logarithm and then difference) is one way of transforming the given
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 8 at 9:51
$begingroup$
data to get new data which are more easy to deal with.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 8 at 9:54
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065708%2fhow-do-i-apply-law-of-large-numbers-in-this-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In this game, what is independent is the rate of the return $frac{K_{n}}{K_{n-1}}$. And it is a function of $X_n$, the result of the $n$-th round coin toss, $X_n = 1$ if coin falls in head and $0$ otherwise. We can see that $frac{K_{n}}{K_{n-1}} = left(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_n}$ and
$$
K_n = 1cdotleft(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_1}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_1}cdotsleft(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_n}=left(frac{5}{3}right)^{S_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{n-S_n}
$$ where $S_n= sum_{j=1}^n X_j$ is the total number of heads until the $n$-th round. Take log on both sides and we have
$$
frac{1}{n}log K_n = frac{S_n}{n}logleft(frac{5}{3}right)+left(1-frac{S_n}{n}right)logleft(frac{1}{3}right).
$$ Strong law of large numbers implies $frac{S_n}{n}to E[X_1] =frac{1}{2}$ almost surely. Thus, it holds
$$
frac{1}{n}log K_n to frac{1}{2}logleft(frac{5}{9}right)=c<0.
$$ It says that $K_n^{frac{1}{n}}to e^c <1 $ and hence $K_n to 0$ almost surely.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you, but why is the rate of return independent, surely it depends on $K_{i}-1$ in the formula $Y_{i}:=frac{K_{i}}{K_{i-1}}$ and similarly $K_{i-1}$ is present in $Y_{i-1}:=frac{K_{i-1}}{K_{i-2}}$
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Jan 8 at 9:38
$begingroup$
Well, yes it's true that $Y_i=frac{K_i}{K_{i-1}}$ contains $K_{i-1}$ in the expression. But it is also true that $Y_i$ and $K_{i-1}$ are independent. Why the previous fact does not contradict the latter independence statement? The reason is that $Y_i$ only depends on the $i$-th round coin toss $X_i$, which is (intuitively) independent of $K_{i-1}$. On the other hand, $K_i$ is a variable dependent on the previous asset $K_{i-1}$. This dependence is eliminated by factoring $K_i$ by $K_{i-1}$. This (which is equivalent to take logarithm and then difference) is one way of transforming the given
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 8 at 9:51
$begingroup$
data to get new data which are more easy to deal with.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 8 at 9:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In this game, what is independent is the rate of the return $frac{K_{n}}{K_{n-1}}$. And it is a function of $X_n$, the result of the $n$-th round coin toss, $X_n = 1$ if coin falls in head and $0$ otherwise. We can see that $frac{K_{n}}{K_{n-1}} = left(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_n}$ and
$$
K_n = 1cdotleft(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_1}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_1}cdotsleft(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_n}=left(frac{5}{3}right)^{S_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{n-S_n}
$$ where $S_n= sum_{j=1}^n X_j$ is the total number of heads until the $n$-th round. Take log on both sides and we have
$$
frac{1}{n}log K_n = frac{S_n}{n}logleft(frac{5}{3}right)+left(1-frac{S_n}{n}right)logleft(frac{1}{3}right).
$$ Strong law of large numbers implies $frac{S_n}{n}to E[X_1] =frac{1}{2}$ almost surely. Thus, it holds
$$
frac{1}{n}log K_n to frac{1}{2}logleft(frac{5}{9}right)=c<0.
$$ It says that $K_n^{frac{1}{n}}to e^c <1 $ and hence $K_n to 0$ almost surely.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you, but why is the rate of return independent, surely it depends on $K_{i}-1$ in the formula $Y_{i}:=frac{K_{i}}{K_{i-1}}$ and similarly $K_{i-1}$ is present in $Y_{i-1}:=frac{K_{i-1}}{K_{i-2}}$
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Jan 8 at 9:38
$begingroup$
Well, yes it's true that $Y_i=frac{K_i}{K_{i-1}}$ contains $K_{i-1}$ in the expression. But it is also true that $Y_i$ and $K_{i-1}$ are independent. Why the previous fact does not contradict the latter independence statement? The reason is that $Y_i$ only depends on the $i$-th round coin toss $X_i$, which is (intuitively) independent of $K_{i-1}$. On the other hand, $K_i$ is a variable dependent on the previous asset $K_{i-1}$. This dependence is eliminated by factoring $K_i$ by $K_{i-1}$. This (which is equivalent to take logarithm and then difference) is one way of transforming the given
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 8 at 9:51
$begingroup$
data to get new data which are more easy to deal with.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 8 at 9:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In this game, what is independent is the rate of the return $frac{K_{n}}{K_{n-1}}$. And it is a function of $X_n$, the result of the $n$-th round coin toss, $X_n = 1$ if coin falls in head and $0$ otherwise. We can see that $frac{K_{n}}{K_{n-1}} = left(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_n}$ and
$$
K_n = 1cdotleft(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_1}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_1}cdotsleft(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_n}=left(frac{5}{3}right)^{S_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{n-S_n}
$$ where $S_n= sum_{j=1}^n X_j$ is the total number of heads until the $n$-th round. Take log on both sides and we have
$$
frac{1}{n}log K_n = frac{S_n}{n}logleft(frac{5}{3}right)+left(1-frac{S_n}{n}right)logleft(frac{1}{3}right).
$$ Strong law of large numbers implies $frac{S_n}{n}to E[X_1] =frac{1}{2}$ almost surely. Thus, it holds
$$
frac{1}{n}log K_n to frac{1}{2}logleft(frac{5}{9}right)=c<0.
$$ It says that $K_n^{frac{1}{n}}to e^c <1 $ and hence $K_n to 0$ almost surely.
$endgroup$
In this game, what is independent is the rate of the return $frac{K_{n}}{K_{n-1}}$. And it is a function of $X_n$, the result of the $n$-th round coin toss, $X_n = 1$ if coin falls in head and $0$ otherwise. We can see that $frac{K_{n}}{K_{n-1}} = left(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_n}$ and
$$
K_n = 1cdotleft(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_1}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_1}cdotsleft(frac{5}{3}right)^{X_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{1-X_n}=left(frac{5}{3}right)^{S_n}left(frac{1}{3}right)^{n-S_n}
$$ where $S_n= sum_{j=1}^n X_j$ is the total number of heads until the $n$-th round. Take log on both sides and we have
$$
frac{1}{n}log K_n = frac{S_n}{n}logleft(frac{5}{3}right)+left(1-frac{S_n}{n}right)logleft(frac{1}{3}right).
$$ Strong law of large numbers implies $frac{S_n}{n}to E[X_1] =frac{1}{2}$ almost surely. Thus, it holds
$$
frac{1}{n}log K_n to frac{1}{2}logleft(frac{5}{9}right)=c<0.
$$ It says that $K_n^{frac{1}{n}}to e^c <1 $ and hence $K_n to 0$ almost surely.
answered Jan 8 at 8:31
SongSong
14.1k1633
14.1k1633
$begingroup$
Thank you, but why is the rate of return independent, surely it depends on $K_{i}-1$ in the formula $Y_{i}:=frac{K_{i}}{K_{i-1}}$ and similarly $K_{i-1}$ is present in $Y_{i-1}:=frac{K_{i-1}}{K_{i-2}}$
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Jan 8 at 9:38
$begingroup$
Well, yes it's true that $Y_i=frac{K_i}{K_{i-1}}$ contains $K_{i-1}$ in the expression. But it is also true that $Y_i$ and $K_{i-1}$ are independent. Why the previous fact does not contradict the latter independence statement? The reason is that $Y_i$ only depends on the $i$-th round coin toss $X_i$, which is (intuitively) independent of $K_{i-1}$. On the other hand, $K_i$ is a variable dependent on the previous asset $K_{i-1}$. This dependence is eliminated by factoring $K_i$ by $K_{i-1}$. This (which is equivalent to take logarithm and then difference) is one way of transforming the given
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 8 at 9:51
$begingroup$
data to get new data which are more easy to deal with.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 8 at 9:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you, but why is the rate of return independent, surely it depends on $K_{i}-1$ in the formula $Y_{i}:=frac{K_{i}}{K_{i-1}}$ and similarly $K_{i-1}$ is present in $Y_{i-1}:=frac{K_{i-1}}{K_{i-2}}$
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Jan 8 at 9:38
$begingroup$
Well, yes it's true that $Y_i=frac{K_i}{K_{i-1}}$ contains $K_{i-1}$ in the expression. But it is also true that $Y_i$ and $K_{i-1}$ are independent. Why the previous fact does not contradict the latter independence statement? The reason is that $Y_i$ only depends on the $i$-th round coin toss $X_i$, which is (intuitively) independent of $K_{i-1}$. On the other hand, $K_i$ is a variable dependent on the previous asset $K_{i-1}$. This dependence is eliminated by factoring $K_i$ by $K_{i-1}$. This (which is equivalent to take logarithm and then difference) is one way of transforming the given
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 8 at 9:51
$begingroup$
data to get new data which are more easy to deal with.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 8 at 9:54
$begingroup$
Thank you, but why is the rate of return independent, surely it depends on $K_{i}-1$ in the formula $Y_{i}:=frac{K_{i}}{K_{i-1}}$ and similarly $K_{i-1}$ is present in $Y_{i-1}:=frac{K_{i-1}}{K_{i-2}}$
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Jan 8 at 9:38
$begingroup$
Thank you, but why is the rate of return independent, surely it depends on $K_{i}-1$ in the formula $Y_{i}:=frac{K_{i}}{K_{i-1}}$ and similarly $K_{i-1}$ is present in $Y_{i-1}:=frac{K_{i-1}}{K_{i-2}}$
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Jan 8 at 9:38
$begingroup$
Well, yes it's true that $Y_i=frac{K_i}{K_{i-1}}$ contains $K_{i-1}$ in the expression. But it is also true that $Y_i$ and $K_{i-1}$ are independent. Why the previous fact does not contradict the latter independence statement? The reason is that $Y_i$ only depends on the $i$-th round coin toss $X_i$, which is (intuitively) independent of $K_{i-1}$. On the other hand, $K_i$ is a variable dependent on the previous asset $K_{i-1}$. This dependence is eliminated by factoring $K_i$ by $K_{i-1}$. This (which is equivalent to take logarithm and then difference) is one way of transforming the given
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 8 at 9:51
$begingroup$
Well, yes it's true that $Y_i=frac{K_i}{K_{i-1}}$ contains $K_{i-1}$ in the expression. But it is also true that $Y_i$ and $K_{i-1}$ are independent. Why the previous fact does not contradict the latter independence statement? The reason is that $Y_i$ only depends on the $i$-th round coin toss $X_i$, which is (intuitively) independent of $K_{i-1}$. On the other hand, $K_i$ is a variable dependent on the previous asset $K_{i-1}$. This dependence is eliminated by factoring $K_i$ by $K_{i-1}$. This (which is equivalent to take logarithm and then difference) is one way of transforming the given
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 8 at 9:51
$begingroup$
data to get new data which are more easy to deal with.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 8 at 9:54
$begingroup$
data to get new data which are more easy to deal with.
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 8 at 9:54
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065708%2fhow-do-i-apply-law-of-large-numbers-in-this-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown