Qualitative dependence of solution to second-order matrix differential equation on eigenvalues












5












$begingroup$


Suppose we have a matrix differential equation in $vec{x}(t)=left(begin{smallmatrix}x_{1}(t) \ vdots \ x_{n}(t)end{smallmatrix}right)$, such that:



$$frac{mathrm{d}^{2}vec{x}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}=-mathbf{M}vec{x}$$



And $mathbf{M}$ is a real, symmetric matrix, which therefore diagonalizes to $mathbf{M}=mathbf{P}mathbf{Lambda}mathbf{P}^{-1}$, with $mathbf{Lambda}=operatorname{diag}(lambda_{1},dots,lambda_{n})$. We can perform a change of basis such that $vec{x}(t)=mathbf{P}vec{eta}(t)$, and therefore we have the following:



$$frac{mathrm{d}^{2}vec{eta}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}=-mathbf{Lambda}vec{eta} implies frac{mathrm{d}^{2}eta_{i}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}=-lambda_{i}eta_{i}$$



This is easy to solve and gives us:



$$eta_{i}=begin{cases}A_{i}cos(2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t)+B_{i}sin(2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t) & lambda_{i} > 0 \
A_{i}t+B_{i} & lambda_{i} = 0 \
A_{i}e^{2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t}+B_{i}e^{-2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t} & lambda_{i} < 0end{cases}$$



We can therefore solve for $vec{x}$ by computing $mathbf{P}vec{eta}$. However, I am then asked how the qualitative behaviour of $vec{x}$ depends upon the eigenvalues of $mathbf{M}$. I am having trouble understanding what is required of me; we have the qualitative behaviour of $eta_{i}$ and it's dependence upon $lambda_{i}$, but without more explicit knowledge of the change of basis matrix $mathbf{P}$ I'm not sure what we can say about $vec{x}$?





The question then requires us to focus on the 2-dimensional coupled system of differential equations:



begin{align}
frac{mathrm{d}^{2}x_{1}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}&=-kx_{1}-lx_{2} \
frac{mathrm{d}^{2}x_{2}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}&= -lx_{1} - kx_{2}
end{align}



We can therefore construct $mathbf{M}=left(begin{smallmatrix}k & l \ l & kend{smallmatrix}right)$, which diagonalizes to give $mathbf{Lambda}=operatorname{diag}(k-l,k+l)$ and $mathbf{P}=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}left(begin{smallmatrix}-1 & 1 \ 1 & 1end{smallmatrix}right)$. Now clearly the solution can be worked out explicitly using the method above and then the qualitative behaviour can be explored, but is there anything we can say without explicit calculation?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure there is more to do than you already did? You have that, depending on the occurrence of positive, negative or zero eigenvalues, the solutions are bounded for all times or exponentially resp. linearly growing in at least one time direction.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Dec 28 '13 at 20:36
















5












$begingroup$


Suppose we have a matrix differential equation in $vec{x}(t)=left(begin{smallmatrix}x_{1}(t) \ vdots \ x_{n}(t)end{smallmatrix}right)$, such that:



$$frac{mathrm{d}^{2}vec{x}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}=-mathbf{M}vec{x}$$



And $mathbf{M}$ is a real, symmetric matrix, which therefore diagonalizes to $mathbf{M}=mathbf{P}mathbf{Lambda}mathbf{P}^{-1}$, with $mathbf{Lambda}=operatorname{diag}(lambda_{1},dots,lambda_{n})$. We can perform a change of basis such that $vec{x}(t)=mathbf{P}vec{eta}(t)$, and therefore we have the following:



$$frac{mathrm{d}^{2}vec{eta}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}=-mathbf{Lambda}vec{eta} implies frac{mathrm{d}^{2}eta_{i}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}=-lambda_{i}eta_{i}$$



This is easy to solve and gives us:



$$eta_{i}=begin{cases}A_{i}cos(2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t)+B_{i}sin(2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t) & lambda_{i} > 0 \
A_{i}t+B_{i} & lambda_{i} = 0 \
A_{i}e^{2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t}+B_{i}e^{-2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t} & lambda_{i} < 0end{cases}$$



We can therefore solve for $vec{x}$ by computing $mathbf{P}vec{eta}$. However, I am then asked how the qualitative behaviour of $vec{x}$ depends upon the eigenvalues of $mathbf{M}$. I am having trouble understanding what is required of me; we have the qualitative behaviour of $eta_{i}$ and it's dependence upon $lambda_{i}$, but without more explicit knowledge of the change of basis matrix $mathbf{P}$ I'm not sure what we can say about $vec{x}$?





The question then requires us to focus on the 2-dimensional coupled system of differential equations:



begin{align}
frac{mathrm{d}^{2}x_{1}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}&=-kx_{1}-lx_{2} \
frac{mathrm{d}^{2}x_{2}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}&= -lx_{1} - kx_{2}
end{align}



We can therefore construct $mathbf{M}=left(begin{smallmatrix}k & l \ l & kend{smallmatrix}right)$, which diagonalizes to give $mathbf{Lambda}=operatorname{diag}(k-l,k+l)$ and $mathbf{P}=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}left(begin{smallmatrix}-1 & 1 \ 1 & 1end{smallmatrix}right)$. Now clearly the solution can be worked out explicitly using the method above and then the qualitative behaviour can be explored, but is there anything we can say without explicit calculation?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure there is more to do than you already did? You have that, depending on the occurrence of positive, negative or zero eigenvalues, the solutions are bounded for all times or exponentially resp. linearly growing in at least one time direction.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Dec 28 '13 at 20:36














5












5








5





$begingroup$


Suppose we have a matrix differential equation in $vec{x}(t)=left(begin{smallmatrix}x_{1}(t) \ vdots \ x_{n}(t)end{smallmatrix}right)$, such that:



$$frac{mathrm{d}^{2}vec{x}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}=-mathbf{M}vec{x}$$



And $mathbf{M}$ is a real, symmetric matrix, which therefore diagonalizes to $mathbf{M}=mathbf{P}mathbf{Lambda}mathbf{P}^{-1}$, with $mathbf{Lambda}=operatorname{diag}(lambda_{1},dots,lambda_{n})$. We can perform a change of basis such that $vec{x}(t)=mathbf{P}vec{eta}(t)$, and therefore we have the following:



$$frac{mathrm{d}^{2}vec{eta}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}=-mathbf{Lambda}vec{eta} implies frac{mathrm{d}^{2}eta_{i}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}=-lambda_{i}eta_{i}$$



This is easy to solve and gives us:



$$eta_{i}=begin{cases}A_{i}cos(2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t)+B_{i}sin(2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t) & lambda_{i} > 0 \
A_{i}t+B_{i} & lambda_{i} = 0 \
A_{i}e^{2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t}+B_{i}e^{-2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t} & lambda_{i} < 0end{cases}$$



We can therefore solve for $vec{x}$ by computing $mathbf{P}vec{eta}$. However, I am then asked how the qualitative behaviour of $vec{x}$ depends upon the eigenvalues of $mathbf{M}$. I am having trouble understanding what is required of me; we have the qualitative behaviour of $eta_{i}$ and it's dependence upon $lambda_{i}$, but without more explicit knowledge of the change of basis matrix $mathbf{P}$ I'm not sure what we can say about $vec{x}$?





The question then requires us to focus on the 2-dimensional coupled system of differential equations:



begin{align}
frac{mathrm{d}^{2}x_{1}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}&=-kx_{1}-lx_{2} \
frac{mathrm{d}^{2}x_{2}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}&= -lx_{1} - kx_{2}
end{align}



We can therefore construct $mathbf{M}=left(begin{smallmatrix}k & l \ l & kend{smallmatrix}right)$, which diagonalizes to give $mathbf{Lambda}=operatorname{diag}(k-l,k+l)$ and $mathbf{P}=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}left(begin{smallmatrix}-1 & 1 \ 1 & 1end{smallmatrix}right)$. Now clearly the solution can be worked out explicitly using the method above and then the qualitative behaviour can be explored, but is there anything we can say without explicit calculation?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Suppose we have a matrix differential equation in $vec{x}(t)=left(begin{smallmatrix}x_{1}(t) \ vdots \ x_{n}(t)end{smallmatrix}right)$, such that:



$$frac{mathrm{d}^{2}vec{x}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}=-mathbf{M}vec{x}$$



And $mathbf{M}$ is a real, symmetric matrix, which therefore diagonalizes to $mathbf{M}=mathbf{P}mathbf{Lambda}mathbf{P}^{-1}$, with $mathbf{Lambda}=operatorname{diag}(lambda_{1},dots,lambda_{n})$. We can perform a change of basis such that $vec{x}(t)=mathbf{P}vec{eta}(t)$, and therefore we have the following:



$$frac{mathrm{d}^{2}vec{eta}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}=-mathbf{Lambda}vec{eta} implies frac{mathrm{d}^{2}eta_{i}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}=-lambda_{i}eta_{i}$$



This is easy to solve and gives us:



$$eta_{i}=begin{cases}A_{i}cos(2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t)+B_{i}sin(2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t) & lambda_{i} > 0 \
A_{i}t+B_{i} & lambda_{i} = 0 \
A_{i}e^{2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t}+B_{i}e^{-2sqrt{lambda_{i}}t} & lambda_{i} < 0end{cases}$$



We can therefore solve for $vec{x}$ by computing $mathbf{P}vec{eta}$. However, I am then asked how the qualitative behaviour of $vec{x}$ depends upon the eigenvalues of $mathbf{M}$. I am having trouble understanding what is required of me; we have the qualitative behaviour of $eta_{i}$ and it's dependence upon $lambda_{i}$, but without more explicit knowledge of the change of basis matrix $mathbf{P}$ I'm not sure what we can say about $vec{x}$?





The question then requires us to focus on the 2-dimensional coupled system of differential equations:



begin{align}
frac{mathrm{d}^{2}x_{1}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}&=-kx_{1}-lx_{2} \
frac{mathrm{d}^{2}x_{2}}{mathrm{d}t^{2}}&= -lx_{1} - kx_{2}
end{align}



We can therefore construct $mathbf{M}=left(begin{smallmatrix}k & l \ l & kend{smallmatrix}right)$, which diagonalizes to give $mathbf{Lambda}=operatorname{diag}(k-l,k+l)$ and $mathbf{P}=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}left(begin{smallmatrix}-1 & 1 \ 1 & 1end{smallmatrix}right)$. Now clearly the solution can be worked out explicitly using the method above and then the qualitative behaviour can be explored, but is there anything we can say without explicit calculation?







calculus linear-algebra ordinary-differential-equations systems-of-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 12 '14 at 16:46







Thomas Russell

















asked Dec 28 '13 at 17:05









Thomas RussellThomas Russell

7,81632551




7,81632551








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure there is more to do than you already did? You have that, depending on the occurrence of positive, negative or zero eigenvalues, the solutions are bounded for all times or exponentially resp. linearly growing in at least one time direction.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Dec 28 '13 at 20:36














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure there is more to do than you already did? You have that, depending on the occurrence of positive, negative or zero eigenvalues, the solutions are bounded for all times or exponentially resp. linearly growing in at least one time direction.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Dec 28 '13 at 20:36








1




1




$begingroup$
Are you sure there is more to do than you already did? You have that, depending on the occurrence of positive, negative or zero eigenvalues, the solutions are bounded for all times or exponentially resp. linearly growing in at least one time direction.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Dec 28 '13 at 20:36




$begingroup$
Are you sure there is more to do than you already did? You have that, depending on the occurrence of positive, negative or zero eigenvalues, the solutions are bounded for all times or exponentially resp. linearly growing in at least one time direction.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Dec 28 '13 at 20:36










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f620598%2fqualitative-dependence-of-solution-to-second-order-matrix-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f620598%2fqualitative-dependence-of-solution-to-second-order-matrix-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

張江高科駅