Intuitive explanation of the Kelly Criterion












1












$begingroup$


According to Wikipedia, the optimal fraction of a bankroll to bet is given by expected net winnings of a $1 bet/net winnings if you win. This can be proven using calculus on the expected value of the logarithm of wealth, but I was curious as to whether a more intuitive explanation exists.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    According to Wikipedia, the optimal fraction of a bankroll to bet is given by expected net winnings of a $1 bet/net winnings if you win. This can be proven using calculus on the expected value of the logarithm of wealth, but I was curious as to whether a more intuitive explanation exists.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      According to Wikipedia, the optimal fraction of a bankroll to bet is given by expected net winnings of a $1 bet/net winnings if you win. This can be proven using calculus on the expected value of the logarithm of wealth, but I was curious as to whether a more intuitive explanation exists.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      According to Wikipedia, the optimal fraction of a bankroll to bet is given by expected net winnings of a $1 bet/net winnings if you win. This can be proven using calculus on the expected value of the logarithm of wealth, but I was curious as to whether a more intuitive explanation exists.







      statistics






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 20 '18 at 23:49









      CasebashCasebash

      5,65834271




      5,65834271






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Two other issues make the Kelly criterion attractive, in that facing a large number of advantageous bets, I believe it roughly:




          • maximises the median of the distribution of your future bankroll


          • minimises the expected time until you achieve a target bankroll level



          though it can lead to painful volatility in your bankroll and depends on you accurately assessing the advantageousness of bets; both of these can be addressed by so-called "fractional Kelly betting" at the cost of possibly not taking sufficient advantage of profitable opportunities






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048070%2fintuitive-explanation-of-the-kelly-criterion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Two other issues make the Kelly criterion attractive, in that facing a large number of advantageous bets, I believe it roughly:




            • maximises the median of the distribution of your future bankroll


            • minimises the expected time until you achieve a target bankroll level



            though it can lead to painful volatility in your bankroll and depends on you accurately assessing the advantageousness of bets; both of these can be addressed by so-called "fractional Kelly betting" at the cost of possibly not taking sufficient advantage of profitable opportunities






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Two other issues make the Kelly criterion attractive, in that facing a large number of advantageous bets, I believe it roughly:




              • maximises the median of the distribution of your future bankroll


              • minimises the expected time until you achieve a target bankroll level



              though it can lead to painful volatility in your bankroll and depends on you accurately assessing the advantageousness of bets; both of these can be addressed by so-called "fractional Kelly betting" at the cost of possibly not taking sufficient advantage of profitable opportunities






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Two other issues make the Kelly criterion attractive, in that facing a large number of advantageous bets, I believe it roughly:




                • maximises the median of the distribution of your future bankroll


                • minimises the expected time until you achieve a target bankroll level



                though it can lead to painful volatility in your bankroll and depends on you accurately assessing the advantageousness of bets; both of these can be addressed by so-called "fractional Kelly betting" at the cost of possibly not taking sufficient advantage of profitable opportunities






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Two other issues make the Kelly criterion attractive, in that facing a large number of advantageous bets, I believe it roughly:




                • maximises the median of the distribution of your future bankroll


                • minimises the expected time until you achieve a target bankroll level



                though it can lead to painful volatility in your bankroll and depends on you accurately assessing the advantageousness of bets; both of these can be addressed by so-called "fractional Kelly betting" at the cost of possibly not taking sufficient advantage of profitable opportunities







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 1 at 3:18









                HenryHenry

                99.3k479165




                99.3k479165






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048070%2fintuitive-explanation-of-the-kelly-criterion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Human spaceflight

                    Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                    張江高科駅