Grub : Windows 10 won't boot (invalid signature)












2














I've been using Ubuntu for a couple of days (work), and this morning I noticed that my Windows 10 wouldn't boot anymore. When I choose :



Windows Boot Manager (on /dev/sda2)


I get :



error: invalid signature.


My dual boot setup worked fine for months, and I have no idea of how it broke. As of now, only Ubuntu boots fine.



I tried many things, like running the usual boot fixing commands from a Windows installation medium.



bootrec.exe /fixmbr
bootrec.exe /fixboot
bootrec.exe /scanos
bootrec.exe /rebuildbcd


The very last command gave the following error:



The requested system device cannot be found


So I followed these instructions, but still no luck.





I also tried to use grub-customizer to create a manual entry for Windows 10, containing the following lines :



menuentry 'Windows 10 on /dev/sda2 MANUAL' {
insmod part_msdos
insmod ntfs
set root=(hd0,2)
chainloader +1
}


Selecting this entry in grub gives:



BOOTMGR missing
Press Ctrl+Alt+Del




Here's my boot-info : http://paste.ubuntu.com/24947042/










share|improve this question





























    2














    I've been using Ubuntu for a couple of days (work), and this morning I noticed that my Windows 10 wouldn't boot anymore. When I choose :



    Windows Boot Manager (on /dev/sda2)


    I get :



    error: invalid signature.


    My dual boot setup worked fine for months, and I have no idea of how it broke. As of now, only Ubuntu boots fine.



    I tried many things, like running the usual boot fixing commands from a Windows installation medium.



    bootrec.exe /fixmbr
    bootrec.exe /fixboot
    bootrec.exe /scanos
    bootrec.exe /rebuildbcd


    The very last command gave the following error:



    The requested system device cannot be found


    So I followed these instructions, but still no luck.





    I also tried to use grub-customizer to create a manual entry for Windows 10, containing the following lines :



    menuentry 'Windows 10 on /dev/sda2 MANUAL' {
    insmod part_msdos
    insmod ntfs
    set root=(hd0,2)
    chainloader +1
    }


    Selecting this entry in grub gives:



    BOOTMGR missing
    Press Ctrl+Alt+Del




    Here's my boot-info : http://paste.ubuntu.com/24947042/










    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2







      I've been using Ubuntu for a couple of days (work), and this morning I noticed that my Windows 10 wouldn't boot anymore. When I choose :



      Windows Boot Manager (on /dev/sda2)


      I get :



      error: invalid signature.


      My dual boot setup worked fine for months, and I have no idea of how it broke. As of now, only Ubuntu boots fine.



      I tried many things, like running the usual boot fixing commands from a Windows installation medium.



      bootrec.exe /fixmbr
      bootrec.exe /fixboot
      bootrec.exe /scanos
      bootrec.exe /rebuildbcd


      The very last command gave the following error:



      The requested system device cannot be found


      So I followed these instructions, but still no luck.





      I also tried to use grub-customizer to create a manual entry for Windows 10, containing the following lines :



      menuentry 'Windows 10 on /dev/sda2 MANUAL' {
      insmod part_msdos
      insmod ntfs
      set root=(hd0,2)
      chainloader +1
      }


      Selecting this entry in grub gives:



      BOOTMGR missing
      Press Ctrl+Alt+Del




      Here's my boot-info : http://paste.ubuntu.com/24947042/










      share|improve this question















      I've been using Ubuntu for a couple of days (work), and this morning I noticed that my Windows 10 wouldn't boot anymore. When I choose :



      Windows Boot Manager (on /dev/sda2)


      I get :



      error: invalid signature.


      My dual boot setup worked fine for months, and I have no idea of how it broke. As of now, only Ubuntu boots fine.



      I tried many things, like running the usual boot fixing commands from a Windows installation medium.



      bootrec.exe /fixmbr
      bootrec.exe /fixboot
      bootrec.exe /scanos
      bootrec.exe /rebuildbcd


      The very last command gave the following error:



      The requested system device cannot be found


      So I followed these instructions, but still no luck.





      I also tried to use grub-customizer to create a manual entry for Windows 10, containing the following lines :



      menuentry 'Windows 10 on /dev/sda2 MANUAL' {
      insmod part_msdos
      insmod ntfs
      set root=(hd0,2)
      chainloader +1
      }


      Selecting this entry in grub gives:



      BOOTMGR missing
      Press Ctrl+Alt+Del




      Here's my boot-info : http://paste.ubuntu.com/24947042/







      boot dual-boot grub2 uefi






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jun 26 '17 at 7:45









      Zanna

      50.2k13133241




      50.2k13133241










      asked Jun 25 '17 at 8:48









      Brummbaer

      3116




      3116






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          I see you've found a solution, and it's one of several I was going to suggest. (Disclaimer: I maintain rEFInd, so I'm not unbiased.) I do want to provide an analysis to suggest what may have gone wrong, though. Also, I have an important suggestion that may help you avoid future problems.



          Based on your Boot Repair output, your first disk (/dev/sda, a 112 GiB disk) uses GPT, has an EFI System Partition (ESP), and has both Windows and Ubuntu (GRUB) EFI-mode boot loaders on its ESP. It looks like Windows is installed on this disk. You also have a second disk, /dev/sdf, a 932 GiB disk that uses MBR partitioning and has both Windows and Ubuntu partitions. It looks like Ubuntu is installed on this disk.



          Ordinarily, the partition table type (GPT vs. MBR) is tied to the way the computer boots -- EFI/UEFI mode with GPT and BIOS/CSM/legacy mode with MBR. There are exceptions to this rule, but it's a useful starting point, especially for Windows. Because your computer has both GPT and MBR disks, this creates some ambiguity; but it looks like Windows originally booted in EFI mode from the GPT disk. Since everything used to work, I'd further hypothesize that Ubuntu was installed in EFI mode, too; but the Ubuntu installation booted from the ESP on /dev/sda to the actual installation on the MBR /dev/sdf. This is perfectly legal; however, it probably led to problems because of an assumption in a script somewhere. This is where I begin to move beyond fairly safe inferences into the realm of sheer speculation. In particular, my guess is that you did a software update in Ubuntu that ended up either breaking GRUB's ability to boot Windows. This can happen sometimes, especially if the Windows Fast Startup and/or Hibernate features are active. These features can cause filesystem damage, which can make the Windows boot loader seem to disappear or malfunction, either temporarily or permanently. Thus, it's imperative that these features be disabled, and I suggest you do so. See here and here for instructions on doing so.



          You then exacerbated the problem by performing recovery actions that were designed for BIOS-mode Windows installations. This put a BIOS-mode Windows boot loader on the first sector of /dev/sda, among other things. Given that rEFInd worked, at least these attempts didn't damage anything further, just added useless cruft.



          In any event, installing rEFInd bypassed the hash that is now the GRUB configuration, thus getting things working. If you're happy with rEFInd, you might as well keep using it. An alternative would be to try to fix the EFI-mode GRUB installation. Boot Repair can often do this, although your computer's odd mix of MBR and GPT, as well as traces of both EFI-mode and BIOS-mode GRUB installations, might confuse that tool. Thus, unless you're seriously unhappy with rEFInd, it's probably best to follow the adage "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." I do strongly advise you to disable Fast Startup and Hibernate in Windows, though; even if rEFInd can launch both Ubuntu and Windows now, if those features are active they could cause new problems in the future.






          share|improve this answer





















          • A very instructive answer ! Indeed, Hibernate and Fast Boot were disabled in Windows because I already had problems with those features, when trying to access my NTFS partitions from Ubuntu. You're right, I have an ESP partition on my small SSD that boots (usually) both Windows (on /dev/sda) and Ubuntu (on /dev/sdf). I'll keep using rEFInd, since I found it very convenient. Install the .deb package file and there you go, everything was fixed. Thank you for all the information about EFI and BIOS modes, my lack of knowledge about these caused me many troubles.
            – Brummbaer
            Jun 26 '17 at 16:07





















          2














          Problem solved, I installed rEFInd using the .deb package file. Now everything works fine!






          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "89"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f928952%2fgrub-windows-10-wont-boot-invalid-signature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            I see you've found a solution, and it's one of several I was going to suggest. (Disclaimer: I maintain rEFInd, so I'm not unbiased.) I do want to provide an analysis to suggest what may have gone wrong, though. Also, I have an important suggestion that may help you avoid future problems.



            Based on your Boot Repair output, your first disk (/dev/sda, a 112 GiB disk) uses GPT, has an EFI System Partition (ESP), and has both Windows and Ubuntu (GRUB) EFI-mode boot loaders on its ESP. It looks like Windows is installed on this disk. You also have a second disk, /dev/sdf, a 932 GiB disk that uses MBR partitioning and has both Windows and Ubuntu partitions. It looks like Ubuntu is installed on this disk.



            Ordinarily, the partition table type (GPT vs. MBR) is tied to the way the computer boots -- EFI/UEFI mode with GPT and BIOS/CSM/legacy mode with MBR. There are exceptions to this rule, but it's a useful starting point, especially for Windows. Because your computer has both GPT and MBR disks, this creates some ambiguity; but it looks like Windows originally booted in EFI mode from the GPT disk. Since everything used to work, I'd further hypothesize that Ubuntu was installed in EFI mode, too; but the Ubuntu installation booted from the ESP on /dev/sda to the actual installation on the MBR /dev/sdf. This is perfectly legal; however, it probably led to problems because of an assumption in a script somewhere. This is where I begin to move beyond fairly safe inferences into the realm of sheer speculation. In particular, my guess is that you did a software update in Ubuntu that ended up either breaking GRUB's ability to boot Windows. This can happen sometimes, especially if the Windows Fast Startup and/or Hibernate features are active. These features can cause filesystem damage, which can make the Windows boot loader seem to disappear or malfunction, either temporarily or permanently. Thus, it's imperative that these features be disabled, and I suggest you do so. See here and here for instructions on doing so.



            You then exacerbated the problem by performing recovery actions that were designed for BIOS-mode Windows installations. This put a BIOS-mode Windows boot loader on the first sector of /dev/sda, among other things. Given that rEFInd worked, at least these attempts didn't damage anything further, just added useless cruft.



            In any event, installing rEFInd bypassed the hash that is now the GRUB configuration, thus getting things working. If you're happy with rEFInd, you might as well keep using it. An alternative would be to try to fix the EFI-mode GRUB installation. Boot Repair can often do this, although your computer's odd mix of MBR and GPT, as well as traces of both EFI-mode and BIOS-mode GRUB installations, might confuse that tool. Thus, unless you're seriously unhappy with rEFInd, it's probably best to follow the adage "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." I do strongly advise you to disable Fast Startup and Hibernate in Windows, though; even if rEFInd can launch both Ubuntu and Windows now, if those features are active they could cause new problems in the future.






            share|improve this answer





















            • A very instructive answer ! Indeed, Hibernate and Fast Boot were disabled in Windows because I already had problems with those features, when trying to access my NTFS partitions from Ubuntu. You're right, I have an ESP partition on my small SSD that boots (usually) both Windows (on /dev/sda) and Ubuntu (on /dev/sdf). I'll keep using rEFInd, since I found it very convenient. Install the .deb package file and there you go, everything was fixed. Thank you for all the information about EFI and BIOS modes, my lack of knowledge about these caused me many troubles.
              – Brummbaer
              Jun 26 '17 at 16:07


















            3














            I see you've found a solution, and it's one of several I was going to suggest. (Disclaimer: I maintain rEFInd, so I'm not unbiased.) I do want to provide an analysis to suggest what may have gone wrong, though. Also, I have an important suggestion that may help you avoid future problems.



            Based on your Boot Repair output, your first disk (/dev/sda, a 112 GiB disk) uses GPT, has an EFI System Partition (ESP), and has both Windows and Ubuntu (GRUB) EFI-mode boot loaders on its ESP. It looks like Windows is installed on this disk. You also have a second disk, /dev/sdf, a 932 GiB disk that uses MBR partitioning and has both Windows and Ubuntu partitions. It looks like Ubuntu is installed on this disk.



            Ordinarily, the partition table type (GPT vs. MBR) is tied to the way the computer boots -- EFI/UEFI mode with GPT and BIOS/CSM/legacy mode with MBR. There are exceptions to this rule, but it's a useful starting point, especially for Windows. Because your computer has both GPT and MBR disks, this creates some ambiguity; but it looks like Windows originally booted in EFI mode from the GPT disk. Since everything used to work, I'd further hypothesize that Ubuntu was installed in EFI mode, too; but the Ubuntu installation booted from the ESP on /dev/sda to the actual installation on the MBR /dev/sdf. This is perfectly legal; however, it probably led to problems because of an assumption in a script somewhere. This is where I begin to move beyond fairly safe inferences into the realm of sheer speculation. In particular, my guess is that you did a software update in Ubuntu that ended up either breaking GRUB's ability to boot Windows. This can happen sometimes, especially if the Windows Fast Startup and/or Hibernate features are active. These features can cause filesystem damage, which can make the Windows boot loader seem to disappear or malfunction, either temporarily or permanently. Thus, it's imperative that these features be disabled, and I suggest you do so. See here and here for instructions on doing so.



            You then exacerbated the problem by performing recovery actions that were designed for BIOS-mode Windows installations. This put a BIOS-mode Windows boot loader on the first sector of /dev/sda, among other things. Given that rEFInd worked, at least these attempts didn't damage anything further, just added useless cruft.



            In any event, installing rEFInd bypassed the hash that is now the GRUB configuration, thus getting things working. If you're happy with rEFInd, you might as well keep using it. An alternative would be to try to fix the EFI-mode GRUB installation. Boot Repair can often do this, although your computer's odd mix of MBR and GPT, as well as traces of both EFI-mode and BIOS-mode GRUB installations, might confuse that tool. Thus, unless you're seriously unhappy with rEFInd, it's probably best to follow the adage "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." I do strongly advise you to disable Fast Startup and Hibernate in Windows, though; even if rEFInd can launch both Ubuntu and Windows now, if those features are active they could cause new problems in the future.






            share|improve this answer





















            • A very instructive answer ! Indeed, Hibernate and Fast Boot were disabled in Windows because I already had problems with those features, when trying to access my NTFS partitions from Ubuntu. You're right, I have an ESP partition on my small SSD that boots (usually) both Windows (on /dev/sda) and Ubuntu (on /dev/sdf). I'll keep using rEFInd, since I found it very convenient. Install the .deb package file and there you go, everything was fixed. Thank you for all the information about EFI and BIOS modes, my lack of knowledge about these caused me many troubles.
              – Brummbaer
              Jun 26 '17 at 16:07
















            3












            3








            3






            I see you've found a solution, and it's one of several I was going to suggest. (Disclaimer: I maintain rEFInd, so I'm not unbiased.) I do want to provide an analysis to suggest what may have gone wrong, though. Also, I have an important suggestion that may help you avoid future problems.



            Based on your Boot Repair output, your first disk (/dev/sda, a 112 GiB disk) uses GPT, has an EFI System Partition (ESP), and has both Windows and Ubuntu (GRUB) EFI-mode boot loaders on its ESP. It looks like Windows is installed on this disk. You also have a second disk, /dev/sdf, a 932 GiB disk that uses MBR partitioning and has both Windows and Ubuntu partitions. It looks like Ubuntu is installed on this disk.



            Ordinarily, the partition table type (GPT vs. MBR) is tied to the way the computer boots -- EFI/UEFI mode with GPT and BIOS/CSM/legacy mode with MBR. There are exceptions to this rule, but it's a useful starting point, especially for Windows. Because your computer has both GPT and MBR disks, this creates some ambiguity; but it looks like Windows originally booted in EFI mode from the GPT disk. Since everything used to work, I'd further hypothesize that Ubuntu was installed in EFI mode, too; but the Ubuntu installation booted from the ESP on /dev/sda to the actual installation on the MBR /dev/sdf. This is perfectly legal; however, it probably led to problems because of an assumption in a script somewhere. This is where I begin to move beyond fairly safe inferences into the realm of sheer speculation. In particular, my guess is that you did a software update in Ubuntu that ended up either breaking GRUB's ability to boot Windows. This can happen sometimes, especially if the Windows Fast Startup and/or Hibernate features are active. These features can cause filesystem damage, which can make the Windows boot loader seem to disappear or malfunction, either temporarily or permanently. Thus, it's imperative that these features be disabled, and I suggest you do so. See here and here for instructions on doing so.



            You then exacerbated the problem by performing recovery actions that were designed for BIOS-mode Windows installations. This put a BIOS-mode Windows boot loader on the first sector of /dev/sda, among other things. Given that rEFInd worked, at least these attempts didn't damage anything further, just added useless cruft.



            In any event, installing rEFInd bypassed the hash that is now the GRUB configuration, thus getting things working. If you're happy with rEFInd, you might as well keep using it. An alternative would be to try to fix the EFI-mode GRUB installation. Boot Repair can often do this, although your computer's odd mix of MBR and GPT, as well as traces of both EFI-mode and BIOS-mode GRUB installations, might confuse that tool. Thus, unless you're seriously unhappy with rEFInd, it's probably best to follow the adage "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." I do strongly advise you to disable Fast Startup and Hibernate in Windows, though; even if rEFInd can launch both Ubuntu and Windows now, if those features are active they could cause new problems in the future.






            share|improve this answer












            I see you've found a solution, and it's one of several I was going to suggest. (Disclaimer: I maintain rEFInd, so I'm not unbiased.) I do want to provide an analysis to suggest what may have gone wrong, though. Also, I have an important suggestion that may help you avoid future problems.



            Based on your Boot Repair output, your first disk (/dev/sda, a 112 GiB disk) uses GPT, has an EFI System Partition (ESP), and has both Windows and Ubuntu (GRUB) EFI-mode boot loaders on its ESP. It looks like Windows is installed on this disk. You also have a second disk, /dev/sdf, a 932 GiB disk that uses MBR partitioning and has both Windows and Ubuntu partitions. It looks like Ubuntu is installed on this disk.



            Ordinarily, the partition table type (GPT vs. MBR) is tied to the way the computer boots -- EFI/UEFI mode with GPT and BIOS/CSM/legacy mode with MBR. There are exceptions to this rule, but it's a useful starting point, especially for Windows. Because your computer has both GPT and MBR disks, this creates some ambiguity; but it looks like Windows originally booted in EFI mode from the GPT disk. Since everything used to work, I'd further hypothesize that Ubuntu was installed in EFI mode, too; but the Ubuntu installation booted from the ESP on /dev/sda to the actual installation on the MBR /dev/sdf. This is perfectly legal; however, it probably led to problems because of an assumption in a script somewhere. This is where I begin to move beyond fairly safe inferences into the realm of sheer speculation. In particular, my guess is that you did a software update in Ubuntu that ended up either breaking GRUB's ability to boot Windows. This can happen sometimes, especially if the Windows Fast Startup and/or Hibernate features are active. These features can cause filesystem damage, which can make the Windows boot loader seem to disappear or malfunction, either temporarily or permanently. Thus, it's imperative that these features be disabled, and I suggest you do so. See here and here for instructions on doing so.



            You then exacerbated the problem by performing recovery actions that were designed for BIOS-mode Windows installations. This put a BIOS-mode Windows boot loader on the first sector of /dev/sda, among other things. Given that rEFInd worked, at least these attempts didn't damage anything further, just added useless cruft.



            In any event, installing rEFInd bypassed the hash that is now the GRUB configuration, thus getting things working. If you're happy with rEFInd, you might as well keep using it. An alternative would be to try to fix the EFI-mode GRUB installation. Boot Repair can often do this, although your computer's odd mix of MBR and GPT, as well as traces of both EFI-mode and BIOS-mode GRUB installations, might confuse that tool. Thus, unless you're seriously unhappy with rEFInd, it's probably best to follow the adage "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." I do strongly advise you to disable Fast Startup and Hibernate in Windows, though; even if rEFInd can launch both Ubuntu and Windows now, if those features are active they could cause new problems in the future.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jun 25 '17 at 15:12









            Rod Smith

            35.1k43870




            35.1k43870












            • A very instructive answer ! Indeed, Hibernate and Fast Boot were disabled in Windows because I already had problems with those features, when trying to access my NTFS partitions from Ubuntu. You're right, I have an ESP partition on my small SSD that boots (usually) both Windows (on /dev/sda) and Ubuntu (on /dev/sdf). I'll keep using rEFInd, since I found it very convenient. Install the .deb package file and there you go, everything was fixed. Thank you for all the information about EFI and BIOS modes, my lack of knowledge about these caused me many troubles.
              – Brummbaer
              Jun 26 '17 at 16:07




















            • A very instructive answer ! Indeed, Hibernate and Fast Boot were disabled in Windows because I already had problems with those features, when trying to access my NTFS partitions from Ubuntu. You're right, I have an ESP partition on my small SSD that boots (usually) both Windows (on /dev/sda) and Ubuntu (on /dev/sdf). I'll keep using rEFInd, since I found it very convenient. Install the .deb package file and there you go, everything was fixed. Thank you for all the information about EFI and BIOS modes, my lack of knowledge about these caused me many troubles.
              – Brummbaer
              Jun 26 '17 at 16:07


















            A very instructive answer ! Indeed, Hibernate and Fast Boot were disabled in Windows because I already had problems with those features, when trying to access my NTFS partitions from Ubuntu. You're right, I have an ESP partition on my small SSD that boots (usually) both Windows (on /dev/sda) and Ubuntu (on /dev/sdf). I'll keep using rEFInd, since I found it very convenient. Install the .deb package file and there you go, everything was fixed. Thank you for all the information about EFI and BIOS modes, my lack of knowledge about these caused me many troubles.
            – Brummbaer
            Jun 26 '17 at 16:07






            A very instructive answer ! Indeed, Hibernate and Fast Boot were disabled in Windows because I already had problems with those features, when trying to access my NTFS partitions from Ubuntu. You're right, I have an ESP partition on my small SSD that boots (usually) both Windows (on /dev/sda) and Ubuntu (on /dev/sdf). I'll keep using rEFInd, since I found it very convenient. Install the .deb package file and there you go, everything was fixed. Thank you for all the information about EFI and BIOS modes, my lack of knowledge about these caused me many troubles.
            – Brummbaer
            Jun 26 '17 at 16:07















            2














            Problem solved, I installed rEFInd using the .deb package file. Now everything works fine!






            share|improve this answer


























              2














              Problem solved, I installed rEFInd using the .deb package file. Now everything works fine!






              share|improve this answer
























                2












                2








                2






                Problem solved, I installed rEFInd using the .deb package file. Now everything works fine!






                share|improve this answer












                Problem solved, I installed rEFInd using the .deb package file. Now everything works fine!







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Jun 25 '17 at 10:22









                Brummbaer

                3116




                3116






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f928952%2fgrub-windows-10-wont-boot-invalid-signature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Questions related to Moebius Transform of Characteristic Function of the Primes

                    List of scandals in India

                    Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?