Aetiology of the word “fullerene” in Chemistry
I am a mathematician and not a chemist, and I am trying to understand the historical relationship and current usage of the word "fullerene" across Mathematics and Chemistry.
I apologise in advance if I say chemically-ridiculous things, but I am genuinely interested in understanding this.
I will assert some things that loosely describe my understanding of the situation, but which may be chemically wrong. Constructive correction is welcomed.
MY UNDERSTANDING FROM MATHEMATICS
(1) In graph theory (my area of Mathematics) a "fullerene graph" or simply "fullerene" is usually defined to be a 3-regular planar graph, where by "graph" we mean a combinatorial graph with vertices and edges (i.e. abstractions of atoms and bonds).
(2) The standard example of a fullerene is a 60-vertex planar graph, whose faces are arranged as in a standard soccer ball, and of course this is the famous geodesic dome structure or buckyball.
[Actually, mathematicians will also use the dodecahedron as a standard example of a fullerene graph because it has just 12 pentagonal faces and no hexagonal faces. This is fine for a mathematician because 0 hexagons is a perfectly sensible number of hexagons but perhaps it is chemically nonsensical.]
(3) This structure and its name arises from the carbon molecule $C_{60}$ which was first synthesised by Kroto et al., which has this spherical shape, and which they named buckminsterfullerene after Buckminster Fuller.
(4) Mathematics writings on fullerene graphs that attempt to explain the relationship to chemical fullerenes then usually say something like:
an actual physical fullerene must have a molecular structure (atoms and bonds) that is a 3-valent planar graph with pentagonal and hexagonal faces
there are lots of mathematically possible fullerenes, but only a minuscule fraction actually physically exist.
to determine whether or not a mathematical structure might be physically realised, we compute the spectrum of the adjacency matrix and magically believe it relates to a mysterious chemistry thing called the HOMO-LUMO gap.
[In addition, some authors insist that to qualify as a fullerene graph, the pentagons must be separated from each other.]
[I guess that as carbon atoms are 4-valent, there must be a pile of double bonds floating around that us mathematicians have just totally ignored!]
MY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CHEMISTRY
(1) When did the very specific term "buckminsterfullerene" get relaxed to "fullerene" and by whom?
(2) To exactly what class of carbon molecules does the term "fullerene" apply?
[I have learned that other forms of carbon include diamond where all atoms are 4-valent, then graphite, then fullerenes but I am hazy on the precise mathematical or chemical distinction. Then I am further confused by the fact that some sources distinguish tube structures (nano-tubes) from spherical structures and only call the latter fullerenes]
Sorry for the ridiculously long first question, but all clarification is gratefully received!
carbon-allotropes
New contributor
|
show 3 more comments
I am a mathematician and not a chemist, and I am trying to understand the historical relationship and current usage of the word "fullerene" across Mathematics and Chemistry.
I apologise in advance if I say chemically-ridiculous things, but I am genuinely interested in understanding this.
I will assert some things that loosely describe my understanding of the situation, but which may be chemically wrong. Constructive correction is welcomed.
MY UNDERSTANDING FROM MATHEMATICS
(1) In graph theory (my area of Mathematics) a "fullerene graph" or simply "fullerene" is usually defined to be a 3-regular planar graph, where by "graph" we mean a combinatorial graph with vertices and edges (i.e. abstractions of atoms and bonds).
(2) The standard example of a fullerene is a 60-vertex planar graph, whose faces are arranged as in a standard soccer ball, and of course this is the famous geodesic dome structure or buckyball.
[Actually, mathematicians will also use the dodecahedron as a standard example of a fullerene graph because it has just 12 pentagonal faces and no hexagonal faces. This is fine for a mathematician because 0 hexagons is a perfectly sensible number of hexagons but perhaps it is chemically nonsensical.]
(3) This structure and its name arises from the carbon molecule $C_{60}$ which was first synthesised by Kroto et al., which has this spherical shape, and which they named buckminsterfullerene after Buckminster Fuller.
(4) Mathematics writings on fullerene graphs that attempt to explain the relationship to chemical fullerenes then usually say something like:
an actual physical fullerene must have a molecular structure (atoms and bonds) that is a 3-valent planar graph with pentagonal and hexagonal faces
there are lots of mathematically possible fullerenes, but only a minuscule fraction actually physically exist.
to determine whether or not a mathematical structure might be physically realised, we compute the spectrum of the adjacency matrix and magically believe it relates to a mysterious chemistry thing called the HOMO-LUMO gap.
[In addition, some authors insist that to qualify as a fullerene graph, the pentagons must be separated from each other.]
[I guess that as carbon atoms are 4-valent, there must be a pile of double bonds floating around that us mathematicians have just totally ignored!]
MY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CHEMISTRY
(1) When did the very specific term "buckminsterfullerene" get relaxed to "fullerene" and by whom?
(2) To exactly what class of carbon molecules does the term "fullerene" apply?
[I have learned that other forms of carbon include diamond where all atoms are 4-valent, then graphite, then fullerenes but I am hazy on the precise mathematical or chemical distinction. Then I am further confused by the fact that some sources distinguish tube structures (nano-tubes) from spherical structures and only call the latter fullerenes]
Sorry for the ridiculously long first question, but all clarification is gratefully received!
carbon-allotropes
New contributor
Indeed seeing fulllerene molecules as simply connected graphs ignore a pile of double bonds which are obviously part and strongly dictating the properties of the molecules. The overall ensemble can be or not stable, and so in different extents. The situation is similar in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or simply cyclic hydrocarbons with different number of C and double bonds. Rules can be emerges and calculations provide insights. Q1 I don't know when and whom Q2 the answer is in your text just skip the recommendation in bracket as I believe there are examples in which two pentagons. ..
– Alchimista
Dec 29 '18 at 10:19
......two pentagons have a bond in common.
– Alchimista
Dec 29 '18 at 10:20
2
To question (1): fullerene is shorter, and both are trivial names. They originate from lab-slang. Once it was known that C-60 is not the only one, the whole class (C-70, and many, many more) was called "fullerenes", defined as distinct molecules with a closed structure (to distinguish from carbon nanotubes).
– Karl
Dec 29 '18 at 12:53
Do you mean etymology?
– Andreas Rejbrand
Dec 29 '18 at 22:40
1
Aetiology = origin / history (of anything).
– Gordon Royle
Dec 29 '18 at 23:55
|
show 3 more comments
I am a mathematician and not a chemist, and I am trying to understand the historical relationship and current usage of the word "fullerene" across Mathematics and Chemistry.
I apologise in advance if I say chemically-ridiculous things, but I am genuinely interested in understanding this.
I will assert some things that loosely describe my understanding of the situation, but which may be chemically wrong. Constructive correction is welcomed.
MY UNDERSTANDING FROM MATHEMATICS
(1) In graph theory (my area of Mathematics) a "fullerene graph" or simply "fullerene" is usually defined to be a 3-regular planar graph, where by "graph" we mean a combinatorial graph with vertices and edges (i.e. abstractions of atoms and bonds).
(2) The standard example of a fullerene is a 60-vertex planar graph, whose faces are arranged as in a standard soccer ball, and of course this is the famous geodesic dome structure or buckyball.
[Actually, mathematicians will also use the dodecahedron as a standard example of a fullerene graph because it has just 12 pentagonal faces and no hexagonal faces. This is fine for a mathematician because 0 hexagons is a perfectly sensible number of hexagons but perhaps it is chemically nonsensical.]
(3) This structure and its name arises from the carbon molecule $C_{60}$ which was first synthesised by Kroto et al., which has this spherical shape, and which they named buckminsterfullerene after Buckminster Fuller.
(4) Mathematics writings on fullerene graphs that attempt to explain the relationship to chemical fullerenes then usually say something like:
an actual physical fullerene must have a molecular structure (atoms and bonds) that is a 3-valent planar graph with pentagonal and hexagonal faces
there are lots of mathematically possible fullerenes, but only a minuscule fraction actually physically exist.
to determine whether or not a mathematical structure might be physically realised, we compute the spectrum of the adjacency matrix and magically believe it relates to a mysterious chemistry thing called the HOMO-LUMO gap.
[In addition, some authors insist that to qualify as a fullerene graph, the pentagons must be separated from each other.]
[I guess that as carbon atoms are 4-valent, there must be a pile of double bonds floating around that us mathematicians have just totally ignored!]
MY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CHEMISTRY
(1) When did the very specific term "buckminsterfullerene" get relaxed to "fullerene" and by whom?
(2) To exactly what class of carbon molecules does the term "fullerene" apply?
[I have learned that other forms of carbon include diamond where all atoms are 4-valent, then graphite, then fullerenes but I am hazy on the precise mathematical or chemical distinction. Then I am further confused by the fact that some sources distinguish tube structures (nano-tubes) from spherical structures and only call the latter fullerenes]
Sorry for the ridiculously long first question, but all clarification is gratefully received!
carbon-allotropes
New contributor
I am a mathematician and not a chemist, and I am trying to understand the historical relationship and current usage of the word "fullerene" across Mathematics and Chemistry.
I apologise in advance if I say chemically-ridiculous things, but I am genuinely interested in understanding this.
I will assert some things that loosely describe my understanding of the situation, but which may be chemically wrong. Constructive correction is welcomed.
MY UNDERSTANDING FROM MATHEMATICS
(1) In graph theory (my area of Mathematics) a "fullerene graph" or simply "fullerene" is usually defined to be a 3-regular planar graph, where by "graph" we mean a combinatorial graph with vertices and edges (i.e. abstractions of atoms and bonds).
(2) The standard example of a fullerene is a 60-vertex planar graph, whose faces are arranged as in a standard soccer ball, and of course this is the famous geodesic dome structure or buckyball.
[Actually, mathematicians will also use the dodecahedron as a standard example of a fullerene graph because it has just 12 pentagonal faces and no hexagonal faces. This is fine for a mathematician because 0 hexagons is a perfectly sensible number of hexagons but perhaps it is chemically nonsensical.]
(3) This structure and its name arises from the carbon molecule $C_{60}$ which was first synthesised by Kroto et al., which has this spherical shape, and which they named buckminsterfullerene after Buckminster Fuller.
(4) Mathematics writings on fullerene graphs that attempt to explain the relationship to chemical fullerenes then usually say something like:
an actual physical fullerene must have a molecular structure (atoms and bonds) that is a 3-valent planar graph with pentagonal and hexagonal faces
there are lots of mathematically possible fullerenes, but only a minuscule fraction actually physically exist.
to determine whether or not a mathematical structure might be physically realised, we compute the spectrum of the adjacency matrix and magically believe it relates to a mysterious chemistry thing called the HOMO-LUMO gap.
[In addition, some authors insist that to qualify as a fullerene graph, the pentagons must be separated from each other.]
[I guess that as carbon atoms are 4-valent, there must be a pile of double bonds floating around that us mathematicians have just totally ignored!]
MY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CHEMISTRY
(1) When did the very specific term "buckminsterfullerene" get relaxed to "fullerene" and by whom?
(2) To exactly what class of carbon molecules does the term "fullerene" apply?
[I have learned that other forms of carbon include diamond where all atoms are 4-valent, then graphite, then fullerenes but I am hazy on the precise mathematical or chemical distinction. Then I am further confused by the fact that some sources distinguish tube structures (nano-tubes) from spherical structures and only call the latter fullerenes]
Sorry for the ridiculously long first question, but all clarification is gratefully received!
carbon-allotropes
carbon-allotropes
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Dec 29 '18 at 9:36
Gordon Royle
1283
1283
New contributor
New contributor
Indeed seeing fulllerene molecules as simply connected graphs ignore a pile of double bonds which are obviously part and strongly dictating the properties of the molecules. The overall ensemble can be or not stable, and so in different extents. The situation is similar in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or simply cyclic hydrocarbons with different number of C and double bonds. Rules can be emerges and calculations provide insights. Q1 I don't know when and whom Q2 the answer is in your text just skip the recommendation in bracket as I believe there are examples in which two pentagons. ..
– Alchimista
Dec 29 '18 at 10:19
......two pentagons have a bond in common.
– Alchimista
Dec 29 '18 at 10:20
2
To question (1): fullerene is shorter, and both are trivial names. They originate from lab-slang. Once it was known that C-60 is not the only one, the whole class (C-70, and many, many more) was called "fullerenes", defined as distinct molecules with a closed structure (to distinguish from carbon nanotubes).
– Karl
Dec 29 '18 at 12:53
Do you mean etymology?
– Andreas Rejbrand
Dec 29 '18 at 22:40
1
Aetiology = origin / history (of anything).
– Gordon Royle
Dec 29 '18 at 23:55
|
show 3 more comments
Indeed seeing fulllerene molecules as simply connected graphs ignore a pile of double bonds which are obviously part and strongly dictating the properties of the molecules. The overall ensemble can be or not stable, and so in different extents. The situation is similar in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or simply cyclic hydrocarbons with different number of C and double bonds. Rules can be emerges and calculations provide insights. Q1 I don't know when and whom Q2 the answer is in your text just skip the recommendation in bracket as I believe there are examples in which two pentagons. ..
– Alchimista
Dec 29 '18 at 10:19
......two pentagons have a bond in common.
– Alchimista
Dec 29 '18 at 10:20
2
To question (1): fullerene is shorter, and both are trivial names. They originate from lab-slang. Once it was known that C-60 is not the only one, the whole class (C-70, and many, many more) was called "fullerenes", defined as distinct molecules with a closed structure (to distinguish from carbon nanotubes).
– Karl
Dec 29 '18 at 12:53
Do you mean etymology?
– Andreas Rejbrand
Dec 29 '18 at 22:40
1
Aetiology = origin / history (of anything).
– Gordon Royle
Dec 29 '18 at 23:55
Indeed seeing fulllerene molecules as simply connected graphs ignore a pile of double bonds which are obviously part and strongly dictating the properties of the molecules. The overall ensemble can be or not stable, and so in different extents. The situation is similar in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or simply cyclic hydrocarbons with different number of C and double bonds. Rules can be emerges and calculations provide insights. Q1 I don't know when and whom Q2 the answer is in your text just skip the recommendation in bracket as I believe there are examples in which two pentagons. ..
– Alchimista
Dec 29 '18 at 10:19
Indeed seeing fulllerene molecules as simply connected graphs ignore a pile of double bonds which are obviously part and strongly dictating the properties of the molecules. The overall ensemble can be or not stable, and so in different extents. The situation is similar in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or simply cyclic hydrocarbons with different number of C and double bonds. Rules can be emerges and calculations provide insights. Q1 I don't know when and whom Q2 the answer is in your text just skip the recommendation in bracket as I believe there are examples in which two pentagons. ..
– Alchimista
Dec 29 '18 at 10:19
......two pentagons have a bond in common.
– Alchimista
Dec 29 '18 at 10:20
......two pentagons have a bond in common.
– Alchimista
Dec 29 '18 at 10:20
2
2
To question (1): fullerene is shorter, and both are trivial names. They originate from lab-slang. Once it was known that C-60 is not the only one, the whole class (C-70, and many, many more) was called "fullerenes", defined as distinct molecules with a closed structure (to distinguish from carbon nanotubes).
– Karl
Dec 29 '18 at 12:53
To question (1): fullerene is shorter, and both are trivial names. They originate from lab-slang. Once it was known that C-60 is not the only one, the whole class (C-70, and many, many more) was called "fullerenes", defined as distinct molecules with a closed structure (to distinguish from carbon nanotubes).
– Karl
Dec 29 '18 at 12:53
Do you mean etymology?
– Andreas Rejbrand
Dec 29 '18 at 22:40
Do you mean etymology?
– Andreas Rejbrand
Dec 29 '18 at 22:40
1
1
Aetiology = origin / history (of anything).
– Gordon Royle
Dec 29 '18 at 23:55
Aetiology = origin / history (of anything).
– Gordon Royle
Dec 29 '18 at 23:55
|
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Fullerenes are distinct (meaning every fullerene type has a well defined structure) carbon-only molecules, where all atoms have three bonds ($sp^2$, or nearly $sp^2$, as they're not exactly planar).
Leaving out very freakish topologies (which are unlikely to be stable and not fullerenes), this leads to a closed shell-like structure where all surface elements are pentagons or hexagons. (Which are not perfect, bond lengths differ slightly if the edge is shared by two pentagons, two hexagons, or one-and-one.)
The simpler, smaller forms are spherical (C60) or prolate (C70, ...), larger ones can probably have a surface that is not completely convex. (anyone seen oblate fullerene structures?)
A carbon nanotube with a well defined, closed end structure can be a fullerene, but they usually haven't got one.
It seems some people also count ordinary CNTs among the fullerenes. However IUPAC goldbook.iupac.org/html/F/F02547.html is even stricter: 12 five-rings, the rest six-rings, closed (cage-like) fused-ring polycycle.
– Karl
Dec 30 '18 at 20:25
So in my research a certain family of graphs has come up - a cluster of 6 pentagons, then an arbitrary number of “layers” each consisting of five hexagons, surrounding the previous structure, then topped off by another “cap” of 6 pentagons. Is this a fullerene? I did some searching (a few months ago) and was pleased to find that it seemed to be a carbon nanotube as well.
– Gordon Royle
2 days ago
add a comment |
The actual word "fullerene" comes from the geodesic dome designed by Buckminster Fuller. The near-spherical structure of $ce{C_{60}}$, the simplest and best known of these molecules, is the dual of the triangular-faced geodesic dome. Mathematical definitions of "fullerenes" come from the same source.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Gordon Royle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107196%2faetiology-of-the-word-fullerene-in-chemistry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Fullerenes are distinct (meaning every fullerene type has a well defined structure) carbon-only molecules, where all atoms have three bonds ($sp^2$, or nearly $sp^2$, as they're not exactly planar).
Leaving out very freakish topologies (which are unlikely to be stable and not fullerenes), this leads to a closed shell-like structure where all surface elements are pentagons or hexagons. (Which are not perfect, bond lengths differ slightly if the edge is shared by two pentagons, two hexagons, or one-and-one.)
The simpler, smaller forms are spherical (C60) or prolate (C70, ...), larger ones can probably have a surface that is not completely convex. (anyone seen oblate fullerene structures?)
A carbon nanotube with a well defined, closed end structure can be a fullerene, but they usually haven't got one.
It seems some people also count ordinary CNTs among the fullerenes. However IUPAC goldbook.iupac.org/html/F/F02547.html is even stricter: 12 five-rings, the rest six-rings, closed (cage-like) fused-ring polycycle.
– Karl
Dec 30 '18 at 20:25
So in my research a certain family of graphs has come up - a cluster of 6 pentagons, then an arbitrary number of “layers” each consisting of five hexagons, surrounding the previous structure, then topped off by another “cap” of 6 pentagons. Is this a fullerene? I did some searching (a few months ago) and was pleased to find that it seemed to be a carbon nanotube as well.
– Gordon Royle
2 days ago
add a comment |
Fullerenes are distinct (meaning every fullerene type has a well defined structure) carbon-only molecules, where all atoms have three bonds ($sp^2$, or nearly $sp^2$, as they're not exactly planar).
Leaving out very freakish topologies (which are unlikely to be stable and not fullerenes), this leads to a closed shell-like structure where all surface elements are pentagons or hexagons. (Which are not perfect, bond lengths differ slightly if the edge is shared by two pentagons, two hexagons, or one-and-one.)
The simpler, smaller forms are spherical (C60) or prolate (C70, ...), larger ones can probably have a surface that is not completely convex. (anyone seen oblate fullerene structures?)
A carbon nanotube with a well defined, closed end structure can be a fullerene, but they usually haven't got one.
It seems some people also count ordinary CNTs among the fullerenes. However IUPAC goldbook.iupac.org/html/F/F02547.html is even stricter: 12 five-rings, the rest six-rings, closed (cage-like) fused-ring polycycle.
– Karl
Dec 30 '18 at 20:25
So in my research a certain family of graphs has come up - a cluster of 6 pentagons, then an arbitrary number of “layers” each consisting of five hexagons, surrounding the previous structure, then topped off by another “cap” of 6 pentagons. Is this a fullerene? I did some searching (a few months ago) and was pleased to find that it seemed to be a carbon nanotube as well.
– Gordon Royle
2 days ago
add a comment |
Fullerenes are distinct (meaning every fullerene type has a well defined structure) carbon-only molecules, where all atoms have three bonds ($sp^2$, or nearly $sp^2$, as they're not exactly planar).
Leaving out very freakish topologies (which are unlikely to be stable and not fullerenes), this leads to a closed shell-like structure where all surface elements are pentagons or hexagons. (Which are not perfect, bond lengths differ slightly if the edge is shared by two pentagons, two hexagons, or one-and-one.)
The simpler, smaller forms are spherical (C60) or prolate (C70, ...), larger ones can probably have a surface that is not completely convex. (anyone seen oblate fullerene structures?)
A carbon nanotube with a well defined, closed end structure can be a fullerene, but they usually haven't got one.
Fullerenes are distinct (meaning every fullerene type has a well defined structure) carbon-only molecules, where all atoms have three bonds ($sp^2$, or nearly $sp^2$, as they're not exactly planar).
Leaving out very freakish topologies (which are unlikely to be stable and not fullerenes), this leads to a closed shell-like structure where all surface elements are pentagons or hexagons. (Which are not perfect, bond lengths differ slightly if the edge is shared by two pentagons, two hexagons, or one-and-one.)
The simpler, smaller forms are spherical (C60) or prolate (C70, ...), larger ones can probably have a surface that is not completely convex. (anyone seen oblate fullerene structures?)
A carbon nanotube with a well defined, closed end structure can be a fullerene, but they usually haven't got one.
edited 2 days ago
answered Dec 29 '18 at 13:13
Karl
5,4661329
5,4661329
It seems some people also count ordinary CNTs among the fullerenes. However IUPAC goldbook.iupac.org/html/F/F02547.html is even stricter: 12 five-rings, the rest six-rings, closed (cage-like) fused-ring polycycle.
– Karl
Dec 30 '18 at 20:25
So in my research a certain family of graphs has come up - a cluster of 6 pentagons, then an arbitrary number of “layers” each consisting of five hexagons, surrounding the previous structure, then topped off by another “cap” of 6 pentagons. Is this a fullerene? I did some searching (a few months ago) and was pleased to find that it seemed to be a carbon nanotube as well.
– Gordon Royle
2 days ago
add a comment |
It seems some people also count ordinary CNTs among the fullerenes. However IUPAC goldbook.iupac.org/html/F/F02547.html is even stricter: 12 five-rings, the rest six-rings, closed (cage-like) fused-ring polycycle.
– Karl
Dec 30 '18 at 20:25
So in my research a certain family of graphs has come up - a cluster of 6 pentagons, then an arbitrary number of “layers” each consisting of five hexagons, surrounding the previous structure, then topped off by another “cap” of 6 pentagons. Is this a fullerene? I did some searching (a few months ago) and was pleased to find that it seemed to be a carbon nanotube as well.
– Gordon Royle
2 days ago
It seems some people also count ordinary CNTs among the fullerenes. However IUPAC goldbook.iupac.org/html/F/F02547.html is even stricter: 12 five-rings, the rest six-rings, closed (cage-like) fused-ring polycycle.
– Karl
Dec 30 '18 at 20:25
It seems some people also count ordinary CNTs among the fullerenes. However IUPAC goldbook.iupac.org/html/F/F02547.html is even stricter: 12 five-rings, the rest six-rings, closed (cage-like) fused-ring polycycle.
– Karl
Dec 30 '18 at 20:25
So in my research a certain family of graphs has come up - a cluster of 6 pentagons, then an arbitrary number of “layers” each consisting of five hexagons, surrounding the previous structure, then topped off by another “cap” of 6 pentagons. Is this a fullerene? I did some searching (a few months ago) and was pleased to find that it seemed to be a carbon nanotube as well.
– Gordon Royle
2 days ago
So in my research a certain family of graphs has come up - a cluster of 6 pentagons, then an arbitrary number of “layers” each consisting of five hexagons, surrounding the previous structure, then topped off by another “cap” of 6 pentagons. Is this a fullerene? I did some searching (a few months ago) and was pleased to find that it seemed to be a carbon nanotube as well.
– Gordon Royle
2 days ago
add a comment |
The actual word "fullerene" comes from the geodesic dome designed by Buckminster Fuller. The near-spherical structure of $ce{C_{60}}$, the simplest and best known of these molecules, is the dual of the triangular-faced geodesic dome. Mathematical definitions of "fullerenes" come from the same source.
add a comment |
The actual word "fullerene" comes from the geodesic dome designed by Buckminster Fuller. The near-spherical structure of $ce{C_{60}}$, the simplest and best known of these molecules, is the dual of the triangular-faced geodesic dome. Mathematical definitions of "fullerenes" come from the same source.
add a comment |
The actual word "fullerene" comes from the geodesic dome designed by Buckminster Fuller. The near-spherical structure of $ce{C_{60}}$, the simplest and best known of these molecules, is the dual of the triangular-faced geodesic dome. Mathematical definitions of "fullerenes" come from the same source.
The actual word "fullerene" comes from the geodesic dome designed by Buckminster Fuller. The near-spherical structure of $ce{C_{60}}$, the simplest and best known of these molecules, is the dual of the triangular-faced geodesic dome. Mathematical definitions of "fullerenes" come from the same source.
answered Dec 29 '18 at 18:14
Oscar Lanzi
14.6k12546
14.6k12546
add a comment |
add a comment |
Gordon Royle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gordon Royle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gordon Royle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gordon Royle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107196%2faetiology-of-the-word-fullerene-in-chemistry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Indeed seeing fulllerene molecules as simply connected graphs ignore a pile of double bonds which are obviously part and strongly dictating the properties of the molecules. The overall ensemble can be or not stable, and so in different extents. The situation is similar in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or simply cyclic hydrocarbons with different number of C and double bonds. Rules can be emerges and calculations provide insights. Q1 I don't know when and whom Q2 the answer is in your text just skip the recommendation in bracket as I believe there are examples in which two pentagons. ..
– Alchimista
Dec 29 '18 at 10:19
......two pentagons have a bond in common.
– Alchimista
Dec 29 '18 at 10:20
2
To question (1): fullerene is shorter, and both are trivial names. They originate from lab-slang. Once it was known that C-60 is not the only one, the whole class (C-70, and many, many more) was called "fullerenes", defined as distinct molecules with a closed structure (to distinguish from carbon nanotubes).
– Karl
Dec 29 '18 at 12:53
Do you mean etymology?
– Andreas Rejbrand
Dec 29 '18 at 22:40
1
Aetiology = origin / history (of anything).
– Gordon Royle
Dec 29 '18 at 23:55