${x_1,…,x_n}$ a basis of $V_1$; SHOW THAT there is a unique linear transformation $f:V_1to V_2$ such that...












0














The following question is given in the book Linear Algebra by A.R. Rao and P. Bhimasankaram:




Let $V_1$ and $V_2$ be vector spaces over $F$ and let ${x_1,...,x_n}$ be a basis of $V_1$. Then, for any given vectors $y_1,...,y_n$ in $V_2$, show that there is a unique linear transformation $f:V_1to V_2$ such that $f(x_1)=y_i$, $i=1,2,...,n$.




I know that it is actually a theorem because I found related questions on the site, but none explaining the proof of the same(most had questions on consequences of the theorem). I am not yet comfortable with the topic of linear transformations, so I don't know how to proceed with the proof. Please, help!










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    HINT: If $a=a_1x_1+cdots +a_nx_n in V_1$, then define a linear transformation $f:V_1to V_2$ such that $f(a)=a_1y_1+cdots +a_ny_n$.
    – Thomas Shelby
    yesterday


















0














The following question is given in the book Linear Algebra by A.R. Rao and P. Bhimasankaram:




Let $V_1$ and $V_2$ be vector spaces over $F$ and let ${x_1,...,x_n}$ be a basis of $V_1$. Then, for any given vectors $y_1,...,y_n$ in $V_2$, show that there is a unique linear transformation $f:V_1to V_2$ such that $f(x_1)=y_i$, $i=1,2,...,n$.




I know that it is actually a theorem because I found related questions on the site, but none explaining the proof of the same(most had questions on consequences of the theorem). I am not yet comfortable with the topic of linear transformations, so I don't know how to proceed with the proof. Please, help!










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    HINT: If $a=a_1x_1+cdots +a_nx_n in V_1$, then define a linear transformation $f:V_1to V_2$ such that $f(a)=a_1y_1+cdots +a_ny_n$.
    – Thomas Shelby
    yesterday
















0












0








0







The following question is given in the book Linear Algebra by A.R. Rao and P. Bhimasankaram:




Let $V_1$ and $V_2$ be vector spaces over $F$ and let ${x_1,...,x_n}$ be a basis of $V_1$. Then, for any given vectors $y_1,...,y_n$ in $V_2$, show that there is a unique linear transformation $f:V_1to V_2$ such that $f(x_1)=y_i$, $i=1,2,...,n$.




I know that it is actually a theorem because I found related questions on the site, but none explaining the proof of the same(most had questions on consequences of the theorem). I am not yet comfortable with the topic of linear transformations, so I don't know how to proceed with the proof. Please, help!










share|cite|improve this question













The following question is given in the book Linear Algebra by A.R. Rao and P. Bhimasankaram:




Let $V_1$ and $V_2$ be vector spaces over $F$ and let ${x_1,...,x_n}$ be a basis of $V_1$. Then, for any given vectors $y_1,...,y_n$ in $V_2$, show that there is a unique linear transformation $f:V_1to V_2$ such that $f(x_1)=y_i$, $i=1,2,...,n$.




I know that it is actually a theorem because I found related questions on the site, but none explaining the proof of the same(most had questions on consequences of the theorem). I am not yet comfortable with the topic of linear transformations, so I don't know how to proceed with the proof. Please, help!







linear-algebra vector-spaces linear-transformations hamel-basis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked yesterday









Za Ira

13211




13211








  • 1




    HINT: If $a=a_1x_1+cdots +a_nx_n in V_1$, then define a linear transformation $f:V_1to V_2$ such that $f(a)=a_1y_1+cdots +a_ny_n$.
    – Thomas Shelby
    yesterday
















  • 1




    HINT: If $a=a_1x_1+cdots +a_nx_n in V_1$, then define a linear transformation $f:V_1to V_2$ such that $f(a)=a_1y_1+cdots +a_ny_n$.
    – Thomas Shelby
    yesterday










1




1




HINT: If $a=a_1x_1+cdots +a_nx_n in V_1$, then define a linear transformation $f:V_1to V_2$ such that $f(a)=a_1y_1+cdots +a_ny_n$.
– Thomas Shelby
yesterday






HINT: If $a=a_1x_1+cdots +a_nx_n in V_1$, then define a linear transformation $f:V_1to V_2$ such that $f(a)=a_1y_1+cdots +a_ny_n$.
– Thomas Shelby
yesterday












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














The fact that ${x_1,dots,x_n}$ is a basis for vector space $V_1$ tells us that every $xin V_1$ can be written as $x=a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ and secondly that this presentation of $x$ is unique.



Now if $f:V_1to V_2$ is indeed a linear transformation satisfying $f(x_i)=y_i$ for $i=1,dots n$ then this leads to:$$f(x)=f(a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n)=a_1f(x_1)+cdots+a_nf(x_n)=a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n$$



showing that $f$ is completely determined by its values on ${x_1,dots,x_n}$.



So proved is actually now that - if such linear transformation indeed exists - then it is unique.



It remains to prove that such $f$ indeed exists.



For that you can just define $f$ by stating that it is prescribed by:$$a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_nmapsto a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n$$
Based on the fact that the presentation $a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ is unique we conclude that like this the function is what we call: well-defined.



That is the first step.



It is evident that it is a function $f:V_1to V_2$ and the second is to check that this function is indeed a linear transformation. For this it is sufficient to prove that it satisfies the two conditions:




  • $f(x+x')=f(x)+f(x')$

  • $f(ax)=af(x)$


If $x=a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ and $x'=a_1'x_1+cdots+a_n'x_n$ then $x+x'=(a_1+a_1')x_1+cdots+(a_n+a_n')x_n$ so that:$$f(x+x')=(a_1+a_1')y_1+cdots+(a_n+a_n')y_n=(a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n)+(a_1'y_1+cdots+a_n'y_n)=$$$$f(x)+f(x')$$



Further $ax=a(a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n)=aa_1x_1+cdots+aa_nx_n$ so that $$f(ax)=aa_1y_1+cdots+aa_ny_n=a(a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n)=af(x)$$



The proof is now complete.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    2














    Any vector $v in V_1$ is of the form $v=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_ix_i$ where $a_i$'s are scalars. Define $f(v)=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i$ and verify that this is linear. If you put $a_1=1$ and $a_i=0$ for $2leq i leq n$ we get $f(x_1)=y_1$. Similarly, $f(x_i)=y_i$ for all $i$. This proves existence. For uniqueness just note that $f(sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i) =sum_{k=1}^{n} a_if(x_i)=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i$ for any linear $f$ with $f(x_i)=y_i$ for all $i$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052045%2fx-1-x-n-a-basis-of-v-1-show-that-there-is-a-unique-linear-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      The fact that ${x_1,dots,x_n}$ is a basis for vector space $V_1$ tells us that every $xin V_1$ can be written as $x=a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ and secondly that this presentation of $x$ is unique.



      Now if $f:V_1to V_2$ is indeed a linear transformation satisfying $f(x_i)=y_i$ for $i=1,dots n$ then this leads to:$$f(x)=f(a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n)=a_1f(x_1)+cdots+a_nf(x_n)=a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n$$



      showing that $f$ is completely determined by its values on ${x_1,dots,x_n}$.



      So proved is actually now that - if such linear transformation indeed exists - then it is unique.



      It remains to prove that such $f$ indeed exists.



      For that you can just define $f$ by stating that it is prescribed by:$$a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_nmapsto a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n$$
      Based on the fact that the presentation $a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ is unique we conclude that like this the function is what we call: well-defined.



      That is the first step.



      It is evident that it is a function $f:V_1to V_2$ and the second is to check that this function is indeed a linear transformation. For this it is sufficient to prove that it satisfies the two conditions:




      • $f(x+x')=f(x)+f(x')$

      • $f(ax)=af(x)$


      If $x=a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ and $x'=a_1'x_1+cdots+a_n'x_n$ then $x+x'=(a_1+a_1')x_1+cdots+(a_n+a_n')x_n$ so that:$$f(x+x')=(a_1+a_1')y_1+cdots+(a_n+a_n')y_n=(a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n)+(a_1'y_1+cdots+a_n'y_n)=$$$$f(x)+f(x')$$



      Further $ax=a(a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n)=aa_1x_1+cdots+aa_nx_n$ so that $$f(ax)=aa_1y_1+cdots+aa_ny_n=a(a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n)=af(x)$$



      The proof is now complete.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        1














        The fact that ${x_1,dots,x_n}$ is a basis for vector space $V_1$ tells us that every $xin V_1$ can be written as $x=a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ and secondly that this presentation of $x$ is unique.



        Now if $f:V_1to V_2$ is indeed a linear transformation satisfying $f(x_i)=y_i$ for $i=1,dots n$ then this leads to:$$f(x)=f(a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n)=a_1f(x_1)+cdots+a_nf(x_n)=a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n$$



        showing that $f$ is completely determined by its values on ${x_1,dots,x_n}$.



        So proved is actually now that - if such linear transformation indeed exists - then it is unique.



        It remains to prove that such $f$ indeed exists.



        For that you can just define $f$ by stating that it is prescribed by:$$a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_nmapsto a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n$$
        Based on the fact that the presentation $a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ is unique we conclude that like this the function is what we call: well-defined.



        That is the first step.



        It is evident that it is a function $f:V_1to V_2$ and the second is to check that this function is indeed a linear transformation. For this it is sufficient to prove that it satisfies the two conditions:




        • $f(x+x')=f(x)+f(x')$

        • $f(ax)=af(x)$


        If $x=a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ and $x'=a_1'x_1+cdots+a_n'x_n$ then $x+x'=(a_1+a_1')x_1+cdots+(a_n+a_n')x_n$ so that:$$f(x+x')=(a_1+a_1')y_1+cdots+(a_n+a_n')y_n=(a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n)+(a_1'y_1+cdots+a_n'y_n)=$$$$f(x)+f(x')$$



        Further $ax=a(a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n)=aa_1x_1+cdots+aa_nx_n$ so that $$f(ax)=aa_1y_1+cdots+aa_ny_n=a(a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n)=af(x)$$



        The proof is now complete.






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          1












          1








          1






          The fact that ${x_1,dots,x_n}$ is a basis for vector space $V_1$ tells us that every $xin V_1$ can be written as $x=a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ and secondly that this presentation of $x$ is unique.



          Now if $f:V_1to V_2$ is indeed a linear transformation satisfying $f(x_i)=y_i$ for $i=1,dots n$ then this leads to:$$f(x)=f(a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n)=a_1f(x_1)+cdots+a_nf(x_n)=a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n$$



          showing that $f$ is completely determined by its values on ${x_1,dots,x_n}$.



          So proved is actually now that - if such linear transformation indeed exists - then it is unique.



          It remains to prove that such $f$ indeed exists.



          For that you can just define $f$ by stating that it is prescribed by:$$a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_nmapsto a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n$$
          Based on the fact that the presentation $a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ is unique we conclude that like this the function is what we call: well-defined.



          That is the first step.



          It is evident that it is a function $f:V_1to V_2$ and the second is to check that this function is indeed a linear transformation. For this it is sufficient to prove that it satisfies the two conditions:




          • $f(x+x')=f(x)+f(x')$

          • $f(ax)=af(x)$


          If $x=a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ and $x'=a_1'x_1+cdots+a_n'x_n$ then $x+x'=(a_1+a_1')x_1+cdots+(a_n+a_n')x_n$ so that:$$f(x+x')=(a_1+a_1')y_1+cdots+(a_n+a_n')y_n=(a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n)+(a_1'y_1+cdots+a_n'y_n)=$$$$f(x)+f(x')$$



          Further $ax=a(a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n)=aa_1x_1+cdots+aa_nx_n$ so that $$f(ax)=aa_1y_1+cdots+aa_ny_n=a(a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n)=af(x)$$



          The proof is now complete.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          The fact that ${x_1,dots,x_n}$ is a basis for vector space $V_1$ tells us that every $xin V_1$ can be written as $x=a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ and secondly that this presentation of $x$ is unique.



          Now if $f:V_1to V_2$ is indeed a linear transformation satisfying $f(x_i)=y_i$ for $i=1,dots n$ then this leads to:$$f(x)=f(a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n)=a_1f(x_1)+cdots+a_nf(x_n)=a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n$$



          showing that $f$ is completely determined by its values on ${x_1,dots,x_n}$.



          So proved is actually now that - if such linear transformation indeed exists - then it is unique.



          It remains to prove that such $f$ indeed exists.



          For that you can just define $f$ by stating that it is prescribed by:$$a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_nmapsto a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n$$
          Based on the fact that the presentation $a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ is unique we conclude that like this the function is what we call: well-defined.



          That is the first step.



          It is evident that it is a function $f:V_1to V_2$ and the second is to check that this function is indeed a linear transformation. For this it is sufficient to prove that it satisfies the two conditions:




          • $f(x+x')=f(x)+f(x')$

          • $f(ax)=af(x)$


          If $x=a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n$ and $x'=a_1'x_1+cdots+a_n'x_n$ then $x+x'=(a_1+a_1')x_1+cdots+(a_n+a_n')x_n$ so that:$$f(x+x')=(a_1+a_1')y_1+cdots+(a_n+a_n')y_n=(a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n)+(a_1'y_1+cdots+a_n'y_n)=$$$$f(x)+f(x')$$



          Further $ax=a(a_1x_1+cdots+a_nx_n)=aa_1x_1+cdots+aa_nx_n$ so that $$f(ax)=aa_1y_1+cdots+aa_ny_n=a(a_1y_1+cdots+a_ny_n)=af(x)$$



          The proof is now complete.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          drhab

          97.4k544128




          97.4k544128























              2














              Any vector $v in V_1$ is of the form $v=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_ix_i$ where $a_i$'s are scalars. Define $f(v)=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i$ and verify that this is linear. If you put $a_1=1$ and $a_i=0$ for $2leq i leq n$ we get $f(x_1)=y_1$. Similarly, $f(x_i)=y_i$ for all $i$. This proves existence. For uniqueness just note that $f(sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i) =sum_{k=1}^{n} a_if(x_i)=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i$ for any linear $f$ with $f(x_i)=y_i$ for all $i$.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                2














                Any vector $v in V_1$ is of the form $v=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_ix_i$ where $a_i$'s are scalars. Define $f(v)=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i$ and verify that this is linear. If you put $a_1=1$ and $a_i=0$ for $2leq i leq n$ we get $f(x_1)=y_1$. Similarly, $f(x_i)=y_i$ for all $i$. This proves existence. For uniqueness just note that $f(sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i) =sum_{k=1}^{n} a_if(x_i)=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i$ for any linear $f$ with $f(x_i)=y_i$ for all $i$.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  2












                  2








                  2






                  Any vector $v in V_1$ is of the form $v=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_ix_i$ where $a_i$'s are scalars. Define $f(v)=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i$ and verify that this is linear. If you put $a_1=1$ and $a_i=0$ for $2leq i leq n$ we get $f(x_1)=y_1$. Similarly, $f(x_i)=y_i$ for all $i$. This proves existence. For uniqueness just note that $f(sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i) =sum_{k=1}^{n} a_if(x_i)=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i$ for any linear $f$ with $f(x_i)=y_i$ for all $i$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Any vector $v in V_1$ is of the form $v=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_ix_i$ where $a_i$'s are scalars. Define $f(v)=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i$ and verify that this is linear. If you put $a_1=1$ and $a_i=0$ for $2leq i leq n$ we get $f(x_1)=y_1$. Similarly, $f(x_i)=y_i$ for all $i$. This proves existence. For uniqueness just note that $f(sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i) =sum_{k=1}^{n} a_if(x_i)=sum_{k=1}^{n} a_iy_i$ for any linear $f$ with $f(x_i)=y_i$ for all $i$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  Kavi Rama Murthy

                  49.2k31854




                  49.2k31854






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052045%2fx-1-x-n-a-basis-of-v-1-show-that-there-is-a-unique-linear-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Human spaceflight

                      Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                      File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg