How do you show that, for any integer, there is a triangle with side rational lengths and that integer area?
In Cohen's book, Cohen's Number Theory Volume 1, the first exercise is to show that, for any integer, there is a triangle with side rational lengths such that the triangle has that integer as an area.
For example,
What are the side rational lengths for an area 2 triangle?
Given Heron's formula for a triangle of area $2$,
$$sqrt{frac{(a+b+c)(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c)}{16}}=2$$
How do we find the sides for a side rational triangle $(a,b,c)$ that satisfies this equation?
Another example, (9,10,17)/6 has area 1, and so on for each integer.
Looking for the method for solving the exercise, not necessarily a compendium of known triples with integer areas.
geometry number-theory triangle diophantine-equations
add a comment |
In Cohen's book, Cohen's Number Theory Volume 1, the first exercise is to show that, for any integer, there is a triangle with side rational lengths such that the triangle has that integer as an area.
For example,
What are the side rational lengths for an area 2 triangle?
Given Heron's formula for a triangle of area $2$,
$$sqrt{frac{(a+b+c)(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c)}{16}}=2$$
How do we find the sides for a side rational triangle $(a,b,c)$ that satisfies this equation?
Another example, (9,10,17)/6 has area 1, and so on for each integer.
Looking for the method for solving the exercise, not necessarily a compendium of known triples with integer areas.
geometry number-theory triangle diophantine-equations
Do you mean a single rational triangle or all of them? The simplest instance is sides $,(5,29,30)/6.$
– Somos
Dec 24 at 0:13
I just mean a single rational triangle with area $2$. Since $(9,10,17)/6$ has area $1$, and you just gave us one for area $2$, then the next question is exactly "how" did you get your simplest instance? Then, we need to find area $3$, I guess. In Cohen's Number Theory book in chapter 1, the first exercise is to show that for all integer areas, one can prove there is a rational triangle. So, "how" do we do this? We don't need all of them for the proof, just one per integer area, for each integer.
– Pythagorus
Dec 24 at 1:53
add a comment |
In Cohen's book, Cohen's Number Theory Volume 1, the first exercise is to show that, for any integer, there is a triangle with side rational lengths such that the triangle has that integer as an area.
For example,
What are the side rational lengths for an area 2 triangle?
Given Heron's formula for a triangle of area $2$,
$$sqrt{frac{(a+b+c)(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c)}{16}}=2$$
How do we find the sides for a side rational triangle $(a,b,c)$ that satisfies this equation?
Another example, (9,10,17)/6 has area 1, and so on for each integer.
Looking for the method for solving the exercise, not necessarily a compendium of known triples with integer areas.
geometry number-theory triangle diophantine-equations
In Cohen's book, Cohen's Number Theory Volume 1, the first exercise is to show that, for any integer, there is a triangle with side rational lengths such that the triangle has that integer as an area.
For example,
What are the side rational lengths for an area 2 triangle?
Given Heron's formula for a triangle of area $2$,
$$sqrt{frac{(a+b+c)(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c)}{16}}=2$$
How do we find the sides for a side rational triangle $(a,b,c)$ that satisfies this equation?
Another example, (9,10,17)/6 has area 1, and so on for each integer.
Looking for the method for solving the exercise, not necessarily a compendium of known triples with integer areas.
geometry number-theory triangle diophantine-equations
geometry number-theory triangle diophantine-equations
edited 2 days ago
Blue
47.6k870151
47.6k870151
asked Dec 23 at 23:02
Pythagorus
1448
1448
Do you mean a single rational triangle or all of them? The simplest instance is sides $,(5,29,30)/6.$
– Somos
Dec 24 at 0:13
I just mean a single rational triangle with area $2$. Since $(9,10,17)/6$ has area $1$, and you just gave us one for area $2$, then the next question is exactly "how" did you get your simplest instance? Then, we need to find area $3$, I guess. In Cohen's Number Theory book in chapter 1, the first exercise is to show that for all integer areas, one can prove there is a rational triangle. So, "how" do we do this? We don't need all of them for the proof, just one per integer area, for each integer.
– Pythagorus
Dec 24 at 1:53
add a comment |
Do you mean a single rational triangle or all of them? The simplest instance is sides $,(5,29,30)/6.$
– Somos
Dec 24 at 0:13
I just mean a single rational triangle with area $2$. Since $(9,10,17)/6$ has area $1$, and you just gave us one for area $2$, then the next question is exactly "how" did you get your simplest instance? Then, we need to find area $3$, I guess. In Cohen's Number Theory book in chapter 1, the first exercise is to show that for all integer areas, one can prove there is a rational triangle. So, "how" do we do this? We don't need all of them for the proof, just one per integer area, for each integer.
– Pythagorus
Dec 24 at 1:53
Do you mean a single rational triangle or all of them? The simplest instance is sides $,(5,29,30)/6.$
– Somos
Dec 24 at 0:13
Do you mean a single rational triangle or all of them? The simplest instance is sides $,(5,29,30)/6.$
– Somos
Dec 24 at 0:13
I just mean a single rational triangle with area $2$. Since $(9,10,17)/6$ has area $1$, and you just gave us one for area $2$, then the next question is exactly "how" did you get your simplest instance? Then, we need to find area $3$, I guess. In Cohen's Number Theory book in chapter 1, the first exercise is to show that for all integer areas, one can prove there is a rational triangle. So, "how" do we do this? We don't need all of them for the proof, just one per integer area, for each integer.
– Pythagorus
Dec 24 at 1:53
I just mean a single rational triangle with area $2$. Since $(9,10,17)/6$ has area $1$, and you just gave us one for area $2$, then the next question is exactly "how" did you get your simplest instance? Then, we need to find area $3$, I guess. In Cohen's Number Theory book in chapter 1, the first exercise is to show that for all integer areas, one can prove there is a rational triangle. So, "how" do we do this? We don't need all of them for the proof, just one per integer area, for each integer.
– Pythagorus
Dec 24 at 1:53
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Well, the formula itself Geronova triangle.
$$S_g=sqrt{(a+b+c)(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(b+c-a)}$$
If: $p,s,k,t$ -integers asked us. Then the solutions are.
$$a=(pt+ks)(k^2+t^2)ps$$
$$b=(pt-ks)((k^2+t^2)ps+(p^2+s^2)kt)$$
$$c=(pt+ks)(p^2+s^2)kt$$
$$S_g=4pskt(p^2t^2-k^2s^2)((k^2+t^2)ps+(p^2+s^2)kt)$$
If $p,s,k,t$ have to be integers, then the parameterization you gave does not even recover the integer areas $1$ or $2$. So, it does not help.
– Pythagorus
2 days ago
add a comment |
For (p,s,k,t)=(2,1,1,1), the formula,
given by "Individ" gives us the
triangle $(a,b,c)=(12,9,15)$ and area $(A) =54$
Where $S_g=4A$
The area $A=54$ is an integer. So integer $(54)$ is represented as a triangle by the formula given by "Individ"
There are numerous formula's to represent the area's of different triangle's.
But if there is a general solution (regarding triangle's) representing all the integer's is anybody' guess.
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– Leucippus
2 days ago
add a comment |
Partial Solution which may help .
Given $Min mathbb{N}$ we are supposed to find $a,b$ and $c in mathbb{Q}$ such that $M^2=s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c) $ where $s=frac{a+b+c}{2}$
This is equivalent to finding $a,b$ and $c$ such that $$16M^2=(a+b+c)(a-b+c)(a+b-c)(-a+b+c)$$
Let $(a-b+c)=X,(a+b-c)=Y$ and $(-a+b+c)=Z$
Then we are supposed determine $X,Y$ and $Zin mathbb{Q}^+$ such that $$16M^2=(X+Y+Z)cdot X cdot Ycdot Z.$$
Let $(X+Y+Z)=2^kcdot M$ and $X cdot Ycdot Z=frac{16M}{2^k}$
The solution to this system exists when $P^2 geq 4Q$ where $P=2^k M-X$ and $Q=frac{16M}{2^k}$
That is solution will exists for some bigger $k$ as LHS of $P^2 geq 4Q$(After making signs of all terms positive by transposing) includes $2^{2k}$ but RHS have highest exponent $2^{k+1}$
We are left to find $Y,Z in mathbb{Q}^+$ such that $(2^kM-Y-Z)(YZ)=16M{2^k}$ and $2^k M-Y-Z >0$.
Note that this is a curve in $mathbb{R}^2. Which is connected
When are rational then $Y,Z$ then $X=2^k M-Y-Z$ which is rational and hence the system of equations $(a-b+c)=X,(a+b-c)=Y$ and $(-a+b+c)=Z$ admits rational solution because they are linear equations.
Note-Other properties of Triangle are automatically satisfied because if $X>0$ then $a+c>b$ and so on.
$P^2ge4Q$ is not necessary to conclude that if $Y$ and $Z$ are rational, then $X$ must be rational to produce integer $M$. And concluding this much is trivial toward trying to establish that integer $4M=sqrt{(X + Y + Z) cdot X cdot Y cdot Z}$ where $X$, $Y$, and $Z$ (all three) are rational, which is the question.
– Pythagorus
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050783%2fhow-do-you-show-that-for-any-integer-there-is-a-triangle-with-side-rational-le%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Well, the formula itself Geronova triangle.
$$S_g=sqrt{(a+b+c)(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(b+c-a)}$$
If: $p,s,k,t$ -integers asked us. Then the solutions are.
$$a=(pt+ks)(k^2+t^2)ps$$
$$b=(pt-ks)((k^2+t^2)ps+(p^2+s^2)kt)$$
$$c=(pt+ks)(p^2+s^2)kt$$
$$S_g=4pskt(p^2t^2-k^2s^2)((k^2+t^2)ps+(p^2+s^2)kt)$$
If $p,s,k,t$ have to be integers, then the parameterization you gave does not even recover the integer areas $1$ or $2$. So, it does not help.
– Pythagorus
2 days ago
add a comment |
Well, the formula itself Geronova triangle.
$$S_g=sqrt{(a+b+c)(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(b+c-a)}$$
If: $p,s,k,t$ -integers asked us. Then the solutions are.
$$a=(pt+ks)(k^2+t^2)ps$$
$$b=(pt-ks)((k^2+t^2)ps+(p^2+s^2)kt)$$
$$c=(pt+ks)(p^2+s^2)kt$$
$$S_g=4pskt(p^2t^2-k^2s^2)((k^2+t^2)ps+(p^2+s^2)kt)$$
If $p,s,k,t$ have to be integers, then the parameterization you gave does not even recover the integer areas $1$ or $2$. So, it does not help.
– Pythagorus
2 days ago
add a comment |
Well, the formula itself Geronova triangle.
$$S_g=sqrt{(a+b+c)(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(b+c-a)}$$
If: $p,s,k,t$ -integers asked us. Then the solutions are.
$$a=(pt+ks)(k^2+t^2)ps$$
$$b=(pt-ks)((k^2+t^2)ps+(p^2+s^2)kt)$$
$$c=(pt+ks)(p^2+s^2)kt$$
$$S_g=4pskt(p^2t^2-k^2s^2)((k^2+t^2)ps+(p^2+s^2)kt)$$
Well, the formula itself Geronova triangle.
$$S_g=sqrt{(a+b+c)(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(b+c-a)}$$
If: $p,s,k,t$ -integers asked us. Then the solutions are.
$$a=(pt+ks)(k^2+t^2)ps$$
$$b=(pt-ks)((k^2+t^2)ps+(p^2+s^2)kt)$$
$$c=(pt+ks)(p^2+s^2)kt$$
$$S_g=4pskt(p^2t^2-k^2s^2)((k^2+t^2)ps+(p^2+s^2)kt)$$
answered 2 days ago
individ
3,2421816
3,2421816
If $p,s,k,t$ have to be integers, then the parameterization you gave does not even recover the integer areas $1$ or $2$. So, it does not help.
– Pythagorus
2 days ago
add a comment |
If $p,s,k,t$ have to be integers, then the parameterization you gave does not even recover the integer areas $1$ or $2$. So, it does not help.
– Pythagorus
2 days ago
If $p,s,k,t$ have to be integers, then the parameterization you gave does not even recover the integer areas $1$ or $2$. So, it does not help.
– Pythagorus
2 days ago
If $p,s,k,t$ have to be integers, then the parameterization you gave does not even recover the integer areas $1$ or $2$. So, it does not help.
– Pythagorus
2 days ago
add a comment |
For (p,s,k,t)=(2,1,1,1), the formula,
given by "Individ" gives us the
triangle $(a,b,c)=(12,9,15)$ and area $(A) =54$
Where $S_g=4A$
The area $A=54$ is an integer. So integer $(54)$ is represented as a triangle by the formula given by "Individ"
There are numerous formula's to represent the area's of different triangle's.
But if there is a general solution (regarding triangle's) representing all the integer's is anybody' guess.
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– Leucippus
2 days ago
add a comment |
For (p,s,k,t)=(2,1,1,1), the formula,
given by "Individ" gives us the
triangle $(a,b,c)=(12,9,15)$ and area $(A) =54$
Where $S_g=4A$
The area $A=54$ is an integer. So integer $(54)$ is represented as a triangle by the formula given by "Individ"
There are numerous formula's to represent the area's of different triangle's.
But if there is a general solution (regarding triangle's) representing all the integer's is anybody' guess.
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– Leucippus
2 days ago
add a comment |
For (p,s,k,t)=(2,1,1,1), the formula,
given by "Individ" gives us the
triangle $(a,b,c)=(12,9,15)$ and area $(A) =54$
Where $S_g=4A$
The area $A=54$ is an integer. So integer $(54)$ is represented as a triangle by the formula given by "Individ"
There are numerous formula's to represent the area's of different triangle's.
But if there is a general solution (regarding triangle's) representing all the integer's is anybody' guess.
New contributor
For (p,s,k,t)=(2,1,1,1), the formula,
given by "Individ" gives us the
triangle $(a,b,c)=(12,9,15)$ and area $(A) =54$
Where $S_g=4A$
The area $A=54$ is an integer. So integer $(54)$ is represented as a triangle by the formula given by "Individ"
There are numerous formula's to represent the area's of different triangle's.
But if there is a general solution (regarding triangle's) representing all the integer's is anybody' guess.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
Sam
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– Leucippus
2 days ago
add a comment |
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– Leucippus
2 days ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– Leucippus
2 days ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– Leucippus
2 days ago
add a comment |
Partial Solution which may help .
Given $Min mathbb{N}$ we are supposed to find $a,b$ and $c in mathbb{Q}$ such that $M^2=s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c) $ where $s=frac{a+b+c}{2}$
This is equivalent to finding $a,b$ and $c$ such that $$16M^2=(a+b+c)(a-b+c)(a+b-c)(-a+b+c)$$
Let $(a-b+c)=X,(a+b-c)=Y$ and $(-a+b+c)=Z$
Then we are supposed determine $X,Y$ and $Zin mathbb{Q}^+$ such that $$16M^2=(X+Y+Z)cdot X cdot Ycdot Z.$$
Let $(X+Y+Z)=2^kcdot M$ and $X cdot Ycdot Z=frac{16M}{2^k}$
The solution to this system exists when $P^2 geq 4Q$ where $P=2^k M-X$ and $Q=frac{16M}{2^k}$
That is solution will exists for some bigger $k$ as LHS of $P^2 geq 4Q$(After making signs of all terms positive by transposing) includes $2^{2k}$ but RHS have highest exponent $2^{k+1}$
We are left to find $Y,Z in mathbb{Q}^+$ such that $(2^kM-Y-Z)(YZ)=16M{2^k}$ and $2^k M-Y-Z >0$.
Note that this is a curve in $mathbb{R}^2. Which is connected
When are rational then $Y,Z$ then $X=2^k M-Y-Z$ which is rational and hence the system of equations $(a-b+c)=X,(a+b-c)=Y$ and $(-a+b+c)=Z$ admits rational solution because they are linear equations.
Note-Other properties of Triangle are automatically satisfied because if $X>0$ then $a+c>b$ and so on.
$P^2ge4Q$ is not necessary to conclude that if $Y$ and $Z$ are rational, then $X$ must be rational to produce integer $M$. And concluding this much is trivial toward trying to establish that integer $4M=sqrt{(X + Y + Z) cdot X cdot Y cdot Z}$ where $X$, $Y$, and $Z$ (all three) are rational, which is the question.
– Pythagorus
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Partial Solution which may help .
Given $Min mathbb{N}$ we are supposed to find $a,b$ and $c in mathbb{Q}$ such that $M^2=s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c) $ where $s=frac{a+b+c}{2}$
This is equivalent to finding $a,b$ and $c$ such that $$16M^2=(a+b+c)(a-b+c)(a+b-c)(-a+b+c)$$
Let $(a-b+c)=X,(a+b-c)=Y$ and $(-a+b+c)=Z$
Then we are supposed determine $X,Y$ and $Zin mathbb{Q}^+$ such that $$16M^2=(X+Y+Z)cdot X cdot Ycdot Z.$$
Let $(X+Y+Z)=2^kcdot M$ and $X cdot Ycdot Z=frac{16M}{2^k}$
The solution to this system exists when $P^2 geq 4Q$ where $P=2^k M-X$ and $Q=frac{16M}{2^k}$
That is solution will exists for some bigger $k$ as LHS of $P^2 geq 4Q$(After making signs of all terms positive by transposing) includes $2^{2k}$ but RHS have highest exponent $2^{k+1}$
We are left to find $Y,Z in mathbb{Q}^+$ such that $(2^kM-Y-Z)(YZ)=16M{2^k}$ and $2^k M-Y-Z >0$.
Note that this is a curve in $mathbb{R}^2. Which is connected
When are rational then $Y,Z$ then $X=2^k M-Y-Z$ which is rational and hence the system of equations $(a-b+c)=X,(a+b-c)=Y$ and $(-a+b+c)=Z$ admits rational solution because they are linear equations.
Note-Other properties of Triangle are automatically satisfied because if $X>0$ then $a+c>b$ and so on.
$P^2ge4Q$ is not necessary to conclude that if $Y$ and $Z$ are rational, then $X$ must be rational to produce integer $M$. And concluding this much is trivial toward trying to establish that integer $4M=sqrt{(X + Y + Z) cdot X cdot Y cdot Z}$ where $X$, $Y$, and $Z$ (all three) are rational, which is the question.
– Pythagorus
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Partial Solution which may help .
Given $Min mathbb{N}$ we are supposed to find $a,b$ and $c in mathbb{Q}$ such that $M^2=s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c) $ where $s=frac{a+b+c}{2}$
This is equivalent to finding $a,b$ and $c$ such that $$16M^2=(a+b+c)(a-b+c)(a+b-c)(-a+b+c)$$
Let $(a-b+c)=X,(a+b-c)=Y$ and $(-a+b+c)=Z$
Then we are supposed determine $X,Y$ and $Zin mathbb{Q}^+$ such that $$16M^2=(X+Y+Z)cdot X cdot Ycdot Z.$$
Let $(X+Y+Z)=2^kcdot M$ and $X cdot Ycdot Z=frac{16M}{2^k}$
The solution to this system exists when $P^2 geq 4Q$ where $P=2^k M-X$ and $Q=frac{16M}{2^k}$
That is solution will exists for some bigger $k$ as LHS of $P^2 geq 4Q$(After making signs of all terms positive by transposing) includes $2^{2k}$ but RHS have highest exponent $2^{k+1}$
We are left to find $Y,Z in mathbb{Q}^+$ such that $(2^kM-Y-Z)(YZ)=16M{2^k}$ and $2^k M-Y-Z >0$.
Note that this is a curve in $mathbb{R}^2. Which is connected
When are rational then $Y,Z$ then $X=2^k M-Y-Z$ which is rational and hence the system of equations $(a-b+c)=X,(a+b-c)=Y$ and $(-a+b+c)=Z$ admits rational solution because they are linear equations.
Note-Other properties of Triangle are automatically satisfied because if $X>0$ then $a+c>b$ and so on.
Partial Solution which may help .
Given $Min mathbb{N}$ we are supposed to find $a,b$ and $c in mathbb{Q}$ such that $M^2=s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c) $ where $s=frac{a+b+c}{2}$
This is equivalent to finding $a,b$ and $c$ such that $$16M^2=(a+b+c)(a-b+c)(a+b-c)(-a+b+c)$$
Let $(a-b+c)=X,(a+b-c)=Y$ and $(-a+b+c)=Z$
Then we are supposed determine $X,Y$ and $Zin mathbb{Q}^+$ such that $$16M^2=(X+Y+Z)cdot X cdot Ycdot Z.$$
Let $(X+Y+Z)=2^kcdot M$ and $X cdot Ycdot Z=frac{16M}{2^k}$
The solution to this system exists when $P^2 geq 4Q$ where $P=2^k M-X$ and $Q=frac{16M}{2^k}$
That is solution will exists for some bigger $k$ as LHS of $P^2 geq 4Q$(After making signs of all terms positive by transposing) includes $2^{2k}$ but RHS have highest exponent $2^{k+1}$
We are left to find $Y,Z in mathbb{Q}^+$ such that $(2^kM-Y-Z)(YZ)=16M{2^k}$ and $2^k M-Y-Z >0$.
Note that this is a curve in $mathbb{R}^2. Which is connected
When are rational then $Y,Z$ then $X=2^k M-Y-Z$ which is rational and hence the system of equations $(a-b+c)=X,(a+b-c)=Y$ and $(-a+b+c)=Z$ admits rational solution because they are linear equations.
Note-Other properties of Triangle are automatically satisfied because if $X>0$ then $a+c>b$ and so on.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Rakesh Bhatt
851114
851114
$P^2ge4Q$ is not necessary to conclude that if $Y$ and $Z$ are rational, then $X$ must be rational to produce integer $M$. And concluding this much is trivial toward trying to establish that integer $4M=sqrt{(X + Y + Z) cdot X cdot Y cdot Z}$ where $X$, $Y$, and $Z$ (all three) are rational, which is the question.
– Pythagorus
16 hours ago
add a comment |
$P^2ge4Q$ is not necessary to conclude that if $Y$ and $Z$ are rational, then $X$ must be rational to produce integer $M$. And concluding this much is trivial toward trying to establish that integer $4M=sqrt{(X + Y + Z) cdot X cdot Y cdot Z}$ where $X$, $Y$, and $Z$ (all three) are rational, which is the question.
– Pythagorus
16 hours ago
$P^2ge4Q$ is not necessary to conclude that if $Y$ and $Z$ are rational, then $X$ must be rational to produce integer $M$. And concluding this much is trivial toward trying to establish that integer $4M=sqrt{(X + Y + Z) cdot X cdot Y cdot Z}$ where $X$, $Y$, and $Z$ (all three) are rational, which is the question.
– Pythagorus
16 hours ago
$P^2ge4Q$ is not necessary to conclude that if $Y$ and $Z$ are rational, then $X$ must be rational to produce integer $M$. And concluding this much is trivial toward trying to establish that integer $4M=sqrt{(X + Y + Z) cdot X cdot Y cdot Z}$ where $X$, $Y$, and $Z$ (all three) are rational, which is the question.
– Pythagorus
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050783%2fhow-do-you-show-that-for-any-integer-there-is-a-triangle-with-side-rational-le%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do you mean a single rational triangle or all of them? The simplest instance is sides $,(5,29,30)/6.$
– Somos
Dec 24 at 0:13
I just mean a single rational triangle with area $2$. Since $(9,10,17)/6$ has area $1$, and you just gave us one for area $2$, then the next question is exactly "how" did you get your simplest instance? Then, we need to find area $3$, I guess. In Cohen's Number Theory book in chapter 1, the first exercise is to show that for all integer areas, one can prove there is a rational triangle. So, "how" do we do this? We don't need all of them for the proof, just one per integer area, for each integer.
– Pythagorus
Dec 24 at 1:53