Why is the Complete Flag Variety an algebraic variety?
Let $V$ be a $mathbb C $ - vector space of dimension $n$.
Let's consider the set $Fl(n)$ of all the complete flags $F_{bullet}$ $$F_1 subset F_2 cdots subset F_n$$ where the $F_i$ are subspaces of $V$ with $dim(F_i)=i$ for every $1 leq i leq n$.
Why is this an affine/projective variety? I know that given that we can use the transitive action of $GL(n, mathbb C)$ and deduce that $$Fl(n) simeq GL(n, mathbb C)/B_n$$ where $B_n$ is the subgroup of the upper triangular matrices. But first we need to show that it is an algebraic variety.
Thanks!
linear-algebra algebraic-geometry lie-groups schubert-calculus
add a comment |
Let $V$ be a $mathbb C $ - vector space of dimension $n$.
Let's consider the set $Fl(n)$ of all the complete flags $F_{bullet}$ $$F_1 subset F_2 cdots subset F_n$$ where the $F_i$ are subspaces of $V$ with $dim(F_i)=i$ for every $1 leq i leq n$.
Why is this an affine/projective variety? I know that given that we can use the transitive action of $GL(n, mathbb C)$ and deduce that $$Fl(n) simeq GL(n, mathbb C)/B_n$$ where $B_n$ is the subgroup of the upper triangular matrices. But first we need to show that it is an algebraic variety.
Thanks!
linear-algebra algebraic-geometry lie-groups schubert-calculus
add a comment |
Let $V$ be a $mathbb C $ - vector space of dimension $n$.
Let's consider the set $Fl(n)$ of all the complete flags $F_{bullet}$ $$F_1 subset F_2 cdots subset F_n$$ where the $F_i$ are subspaces of $V$ with $dim(F_i)=i$ for every $1 leq i leq n$.
Why is this an affine/projective variety? I know that given that we can use the transitive action of $GL(n, mathbb C)$ and deduce that $$Fl(n) simeq GL(n, mathbb C)/B_n$$ where $B_n$ is the subgroup of the upper triangular matrices. But first we need to show that it is an algebraic variety.
Thanks!
linear-algebra algebraic-geometry lie-groups schubert-calculus
Let $V$ be a $mathbb C $ - vector space of dimension $n$.
Let's consider the set $Fl(n)$ of all the complete flags $F_{bullet}$ $$F_1 subset F_2 cdots subset F_n$$ where the $F_i$ are subspaces of $V$ with $dim(F_i)=i$ for every $1 leq i leq n$.
Why is this an affine/projective variety? I know that given that we can use the transitive action of $GL(n, mathbb C)$ and deduce that $$Fl(n) simeq GL(n, mathbb C)/B_n$$ where $B_n$ is the subgroup of the upper triangular matrices. But first we need to show that it is an algebraic variety.
Thanks!
linear-algebra algebraic-geometry lie-groups schubert-calculus
linear-algebra algebraic-geometry lie-groups schubert-calculus
edited yesterday
Matt Samuel
37k63465
37k63465
asked Mar 26 '17 at 20:52
Maffred
2,670625
2,670625
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
because of that identification we can put a variety (projective) structure on it...comes from projective structure of GL(n,C)/B_n.
there is another identification that this collection of complete flags can be thought of as inside product of G(1,n) x G(2,n) x ... x G(n-1,n)
where G(r,n) Grassmanian variety .
I like the second identification! Why is it an algebraic subset of that product?
– Maffred
Mar 26 '17 at 21:09
2
Because you can encode the containment of subspaces as polynomial equations in the Plucker coordinates of the subspaces.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 26 '17 at 21:45
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2204348%2fwhy-is-the-complete-flag-variety-an-algebraic-variety%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
because of that identification we can put a variety (projective) structure on it...comes from projective structure of GL(n,C)/B_n.
there is another identification that this collection of complete flags can be thought of as inside product of G(1,n) x G(2,n) x ... x G(n-1,n)
where G(r,n) Grassmanian variety .
I like the second identification! Why is it an algebraic subset of that product?
– Maffred
Mar 26 '17 at 21:09
2
Because you can encode the containment of subspaces as polynomial equations in the Plucker coordinates of the subspaces.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 26 '17 at 21:45
add a comment |
because of that identification we can put a variety (projective) structure on it...comes from projective structure of GL(n,C)/B_n.
there is another identification that this collection of complete flags can be thought of as inside product of G(1,n) x G(2,n) x ... x G(n-1,n)
where G(r,n) Grassmanian variety .
I like the second identification! Why is it an algebraic subset of that product?
– Maffred
Mar 26 '17 at 21:09
2
Because you can encode the containment of subspaces as polynomial equations in the Plucker coordinates of the subspaces.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 26 '17 at 21:45
add a comment |
because of that identification we can put a variety (projective) structure on it...comes from projective structure of GL(n,C)/B_n.
there is another identification that this collection of complete flags can be thought of as inside product of G(1,n) x G(2,n) x ... x G(n-1,n)
where G(r,n) Grassmanian variety .
because of that identification we can put a variety (projective) structure on it...comes from projective structure of GL(n,C)/B_n.
there is another identification that this collection of complete flags can be thought of as inside product of G(1,n) x G(2,n) x ... x G(n-1,n)
where G(r,n) Grassmanian variety .
answered Mar 26 '17 at 21:02
Pinaki Saha
312
312
I like the second identification! Why is it an algebraic subset of that product?
– Maffred
Mar 26 '17 at 21:09
2
Because you can encode the containment of subspaces as polynomial equations in the Plucker coordinates of the subspaces.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 26 '17 at 21:45
add a comment |
I like the second identification! Why is it an algebraic subset of that product?
– Maffred
Mar 26 '17 at 21:09
2
Because you can encode the containment of subspaces as polynomial equations in the Plucker coordinates of the subspaces.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 26 '17 at 21:45
I like the second identification! Why is it an algebraic subset of that product?
– Maffred
Mar 26 '17 at 21:09
I like the second identification! Why is it an algebraic subset of that product?
– Maffred
Mar 26 '17 at 21:09
2
2
Because you can encode the containment of subspaces as polynomial equations in the Plucker coordinates of the subspaces.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 26 '17 at 21:45
Because you can encode the containment of subspaces as polynomial equations in the Plucker coordinates of the subspaces.
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 26 '17 at 21:45
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2204348%2fwhy-is-the-complete-flag-variety-an-algebraic-variety%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown