Visualizing $E=Ycap G$ geometrically for some open set $Gsubset X$












3














I came across this theorem(2.30) in Rudin's text on analysis.
Suppose $Ysubset X$. A subset $E$ of $Y$ is open relative to $Y$ if and only if $E=Ycap G$ for some open subset $G$ of $X$.
(A set $Esubset Y$ is open relative to $Y$ when for every $pin E$, there is an $r_p>0$ such that $qin Y$ and $d(p, q)<r_p$ implies $qin E$.)



I can understand the proof he has provided. He has tried to construct such a $G$ by defining open sets $V_p$ as follows: $V_p={qin X|d(p,q)}<r_p$ and has taken $G= cup_{pin E}V_p$ which is good enough to prove that $Esubset Gcap Y$.



But I am still unable to understand the geometric intuition behind this; in particular, what is the geometric motivation behind such a construction? I am interested in a better way to visualize this which will allow me to construct a formal proof by looking at the picture.










share|cite|improve this question



























    3














    I came across this theorem(2.30) in Rudin's text on analysis.
    Suppose $Ysubset X$. A subset $E$ of $Y$ is open relative to $Y$ if and only if $E=Ycap G$ for some open subset $G$ of $X$.
    (A set $Esubset Y$ is open relative to $Y$ when for every $pin E$, there is an $r_p>0$ such that $qin Y$ and $d(p, q)<r_p$ implies $qin E$.)



    I can understand the proof he has provided. He has tried to construct such a $G$ by defining open sets $V_p$ as follows: $V_p={qin X|d(p,q)}<r_p$ and has taken $G= cup_{pin E}V_p$ which is good enough to prove that $Esubset Gcap Y$.



    But I am still unable to understand the geometric intuition behind this; in particular, what is the geometric motivation behind such a construction? I am interested in a better way to visualize this which will allow me to construct a formal proof by looking at the picture.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      3












      3








      3


      1





      I came across this theorem(2.30) in Rudin's text on analysis.
      Suppose $Ysubset X$. A subset $E$ of $Y$ is open relative to $Y$ if and only if $E=Ycap G$ for some open subset $G$ of $X$.
      (A set $Esubset Y$ is open relative to $Y$ when for every $pin E$, there is an $r_p>0$ such that $qin Y$ and $d(p, q)<r_p$ implies $qin E$.)



      I can understand the proof he has provided. He has tried to construct such a $G$ by defining open sets $V_p$ as follows: $V_p={qin X|d(p,q)}<r_p$ and has taken $G= cup_{pin E}V_p$ which is good enough to prove that $Esubset Gcap Y$.



      But I am still unable to understand the geometric intuition behind this; in particular, what is the geometric motivation behind such a construction? I am interested in a better way to visualize this which will allow me to construct a formal proof by looking at the picture.










      share|cite|improve this question













      I came across this theorem(2.30) in Rudin's text on analysis.
      Suppose $Ysubset X$. A subset $E$ of $Y$ is open relative to $Y$ if and only if $E=Ycap G$ for some open subset $G$ of $X$.
      (A set $Esubset Y$ is open relative to $Y$ when for every $pin E$, there is an $r_p>0$ such that $qin Y$ and $d(p, q)<r_p$ implies $qin E$.)



      I can understand the proof he has provided. He has tried to construct such a $G$ by defining open sets $V_p$ as follows: $V_p={qin X|d(p,q)}<r_p$ and has taken $G= cup_{pin E}V_p$ which is good enough to prove that $Esubset Gcap Y$.



      But I am still unable to understand the geometric intuition behind this; in particular, what is the geometric motivation behind such a construction? I am interested in a better way to visualize this which will allow me to construct a formal proof by looking at the picture.







      real-analysis general-topology






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 28 '13 at 10:51







      user67449





























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          To understand this construction you should see it in the general context of constructing new topological spaces from old ones. In the following picture (taken from Topology and Groupoids)



          subspace



          we have the big space $X=mathbb R^2$, the usual plane, and the subset $A$, which is the circle. You also see a point $P$ on the circle and the intersection of a neighbourhood of $P$ with the circle. This "square""neighbourhood would be given by a distance if the distance used on the plane is given by the norm $||(x,y)||=max(|x|,|y|)$. The picture also shows a point $Q$ on $A$ and an open set in $X$ whose intersection with $A$ is not a neighbourhood of $Q$.



          Drawing a picture of this type should give you a key idea of the proof which you have written out.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f344617%2fvisualizing-e-y-cap-g-geometrically-for-some-open-set-g-subset-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown
























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            To understand this construction you should see it in the general context of constructing new topological spaces from old ones. In the following picture (taken from Topology and Groupoids)



            subspace



            we have the big space $X=mathbb R^2$, the usual plane, and the subset $A$, which is the circle. You also see a point $P$ on the circle and the intersection of a neighbourhood of $P$ with the circle. This "square""neighbourhood would be given by a distance if the distance used on the plane is given by the norm $||(x,y)||=max(|x|,|y|)$. The picture also shows a point $Q$ on $A$ and an open set in $X$ whose intersection with $A$ is not a neighbourhood of $Q$.



            Drawing a picture of this type should give you a key idea of the proof which you have written out.






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              1














              To understand this construction you should see it in the general context of constructing new topological spaces from old ones. In the following picture (taken from Topology and Groupoids)



              subspace



              we have the big space $X=mathbb R^2$, the usual plane, and the subset $A$, which is the circle. You also see a point $P$ on the circle and the intersection of a neighbourhood of $P$ with the circle. This "square""neighbourhood would be given by a distance if the distance used on the plane is given by the norm $||(x,y)||=max(|x|,|y|)$. The picture also shows a point $Q$ on $A$ and an open set in $X$ whose intersection with $A$ is not a neighbourhood of $Q$.



              Drawing a picture of this type should give you a key idea of the proof which you have written out.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1






                To understand this construction you should see it in the general context of constructing new topological spaces from old ones. In the following picture (taken from Topology and Groupoids)



                subspace



                we have the big space $X=mathbb R^2$, the usual plane, and the subset $A$, which is the circle. You also see a point $P$ on the circle and the intersection of a neighbourhood of $P$ with the circle. This "square""neighbourhood would be given by a distance if the distance used on the plane is given by the norm $||(x,y)||=max(|x|,|y|)$. The picture also shows a point $Q$ on $A$ and an open set in $X$ whose intersection with $A$ is not a neighbourhood of $Q$.



                Drawing a picture of this type should give you a key idea of the proof which you have written out.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                To understand this construction you should see it in the general context of constructing new topological spaces from old ones. In the following picture (taken from Topology and Groupoids)



                subspace



                we have the big space $X=mathbb R^2$, the usual plane, and the subset $A$, which is the circle. You also see a point $P$ on the circle and the intersection of a neighbourhood of $P$ with the circle. This "square""neighbourhood would be given by a distance if the distance used on the plane is given by the norm $||(x,y)||=max(|x|,|y|)$. The picture also shows a point $Q$ on $A$ and an open set in $X$ whose intersection with $A$ is not a neighbourhood of $Q$.



                Drawing a picture of this type should give you a key idea of the proof which you have written out.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited yesterday









                Glorfindel

                3,41981830




                3,41981830










                answered Mar 28 '13 at 12:28









                Ronnie Brown

                11.9k12938




                11.9k12938






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f344617%2fvisualizing-e-y-cap-g-geometrically-for-some-open-set-g-subset-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Human spaceflight

                    Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                    張江高科駅