Extrapolation error of linear regression lines for a two-cluster data set
I am studying on some linear regression problems using the least-squares method and stumbled upon a problem regarding the error when extrapolating far-away datapoints.
About the problem: For a point $y$ given by best fitting line, described by
$y = ax + b$,
where $a$ and $b$ are the coefficients achieved by applying the least-squares-method to a given data set,
we know that generally, the error or the variance for $y$, will increase, the further we move away from our actual data, while the variance will be minimal at the mean position of $x$ of our given data set. This is so far totally clear for me.
But now I wondered:
Say, I have a given data set that consists of two clusters, with many datapoints around a very small negative position $j$ and another cluster at a very big positive position $k$.
Wouldn't the overall error of the best fitting line be decreased now? Will our line, for example for interpolating points in between, be a better fit with this kind of measurement, than a line that comes from only one data cluster int the 'middle' of the two-cluster version?
I hope I explained my problem sufficiently and I am excited for your suggestions!
regression least-squares data-analysis error-propagation
New contributor
add a comment |
I am studying on some linear regression problems using the least-squares method and stumbled upon a problem regarding the error when extrapolating far-away datapoints.
About the problem: For a point $y$ given by best fitting line, described by
$y = ax + b$,
where $a$ and $b$ are the coefficients achieved by applying the least-squares-method to a given data set,
we know that generally, the error or the variance for $y$, will increase, the further we move away from our actual data, while the variance will be minimal at the mean position of $x$ of our given data set. This is so far totally clear for me.
But now I wondered:
Say, I have a given data set that consists of two clusters, with many datapoints around a very small negative position $j$ and another cluster at a very big positive position $k$.
Wouldn't the overall error of the best fitting line be decreased now? Will our line, for example for interpolating points in between, be a better fit with this kind of measurement, than a line that comes from only one data cluster int the 'middle' of the two-cluster version?
I hope I explained my problem sufficiently and I am excited for your suggestions!
regression least-squares data-analysis error-propagation
New contributor
add a comment |
I am studying on some linear regression problems using the least-squares method and stumbled upon a problem regarding the error when extrapolating far-away datapoints.
About the problem: For a point $y$ given by best fitting line, described by
$y = ax + b$,
where $a$ and $b$ are the coefficients achieved by applying the least-squares-method to a given data set,
we know that generally, the error or the variance for $y$, will increase, the further we move away from our actual data, while the variance will be minimal at the mean position of $x$ of our given data set. This is so far totally clear for me.
But now I wondered:
Say, I have a given data set that consists of two clusters, with many datapoints around a very small negative position $j$ and another cluster at a very big positive position $k$.
Wouldn't the overall error of the best fitting line be decreased now? Will our line, for example for interpolating points in between, be a better fit with this kind of measurement, than a line that comes from only one data cluster int the 'middle' of the two-cluster version?
I hope I explained my problem sufficiently and I am excited for your suggestions!
regression least-squares data-analysis error-propagation
New contributor
I am studying on some linear regression problems using the least-squares method and stumbled upon a problem regarding the error when extrapolating far-away datapoints.
About the problem: For a point $y$ given by best fitting line, described by
$y = ax + b$,
where $a$ and $b$ are the coefficients achieved by applying the least-squares-method to a given data set,
we know that generally, the error or the variance for $y$, will increase, the further we move away from our actual data, while the variance will be minimal at the mean position of $x$ of our given data set. This is so far totally clear for me.
But now I wondered:
Say, I have a given data set that consists of two clusters, with many datapoints around a very small negative position $j$ and another cluster at a very big positive position $k$.
Wouldn't the overall error of the best fitting line be decreased now? Will our line, for example for interpolating points in between, be a better fit with this kind of measurement, than a line that comes from only one data cluster int the 'middle' of the two-cluster version?
I hope I explained my problem sufficiently and I am excited for your suggestions!
regression least-squares data-analysis error-propagation
regression least-squares data-analysis error-propagation
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
t.ysn
1257
1257
New contributor
asked yesterday
felixei
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
felixei is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052079%2fextrapolation-error-of-linear-regression-lines-for-a-two-cluster-data-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
felixei is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
felixei is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
felixei is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
felixei is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052079%2fextrapolation-error-of-linear-regression-lines-for-a-two-cluster-data-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown