Solve linear equation
I am working on some practice linear algebra problems but I am not understanding how the answers where gotten for the following problem.
Problem:
find all values of $a$ for which the resulting linear system has (a) no solution, (b) a unique solution, and (c) infinitely many solutions.
begin{cases} x + y - z =2\ x + 2y + z = 3 \ x + y + (a^2 -5)z = a end{cases}
Answer:
(a) $a= -2,;$ (b) $;aneq pm2,;$ (c) $a=2$
I can't for the life figure how they got the answer in the book. I only got as far as the row echelon matrix.
$begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 & -1 & 2\0 & 1 & 2 & 1\ 0 & 0 & a^2 - 4 & a-2end{bmatrix}$
Can anyone recommend an approach for solving the problem.
linear-algebra
add a comment |
I am working on some practice linear algebra problems but I am not understanding how the answers where gotten for the following problem.
Problem:
find all values of $a$ for which the resulting linear system has (a) no solution, (b) a unique solution, and (c) infinitely many solutions.
begin{cases} x + y - z =2\ x + 2y + z = 3 \ x + y + (a^2 -5)z = a end{cases}
Answer:
(a) $a= -2,;$ (b) $;aneq pm2,;$ (c) $a=2$
I can't for the life figure how they got the answer in the book. I only got as far as the row echelon matrix.
$begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 & -1 & 2\0 & 1 & 2 & 1\ 0 & 0 & a^2 - 4 & a-2end{bmatrix}$
Can anyone recommend an approach for solving the problem.
linear-algebra
What are $b$ and $c$?
– Bernard
yesterday
@Bernard thats what I am wondering. It is from the text Introductory Linear Algebra with applications 7th edition.
– user1238097
yesterday
add a comment |
I am working on some practice linear algebra problems but I am not understanding how the answers where gotten for the following problem.
Problem:
find all values of $a$ for which the resulting linear system has (a) no solution, (b) a unique solution, and (c) infinitely many solutions.
begin{cases} x + y - z =2\ x + 2y + z = 3 \ x + y + (a^2 -5)z = a end{cases}
Answer:
(a) $a= -2,;$ (b) $;aneq pm2,;$ (c) $a=2$
I can't for the life figure how they got the answer in the book. I only got as far as the row echelon matrix.
$begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 & -1 & 2\0 & 1 & 2 & 1\ 0 & 0 & a^2 - 4 & a-2end{bmatrix}$
Can anyone recommend an approach for solving the problem.
linear-algebra
I am working on some practice linear algebra problems but I am not understanding how the answers where gotten for the following problem.
Problem:
find all values of $a$ for which the resulting linear system has (a) no solution, (b) a unique solution, and (c) infinitely many solutions.
begin{cases} x + y - z =2\ x + 2y + z = 3 \ x + y + (a^2 -5)z = a end{cases}
Answer:
(a) $a= -2,;$ (b) $;aneq pm2,;$ (c) $a=2$
I can't for the life figure how they got the answer in the book. I only got as far as the row echelon matrix.
$begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 & -1 & 2\0 & 1 & 2 & 1\ 0 & 0 & a^2 - 4 & a-2end{bmatrix}$
Can anyone recommend an approach for solving the problem.
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
edited 23 hours ago
asked yesterday
user1238097
507
507
What are $b$ and $c$?
– Bernard
yesterday
@Bernard thats what I am wondering. It is from the text Introductory Linear Algebra with applications 7th edition.
– user1238097
yesterday
add a comment |
What are $b$ and $c$?
– Bernard
yesterday
@Bernard thats what I am wondering. It is from the text Introductory Linear Algebra with applications 7th edition.
– user1238097
yesterday
What are $b$ and $c$?
– Bernard
yesterday
What are $b$ and $c$?
– Bernard
yesterday
@Bernard thats what I am wondering. It is from the text Introductory Linear Algebra with applications 7th edition.
– user1238097
yesterday
@Bernard thats what I am wondering. It is from the text Introductory Linear Algebra with applications 7th edition.
– user1238097
yesterday
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
Having the matrix in something approaching row echelon form is definitely the right way to go, and you are nearly done once you have it. Unfortunately I think you did your final row operation incorrectly; my row echelon form matrix looks like this:
$$
begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 & -1 & 2\0 & 1 & 2 & 1\ 0 & 0 & a^2-4 & a-2end{bmatrix}
$$
Is this enough to show you the way?
New contributor
I think I get where the a^2 - 4 gives the + or - 2. The not equal is because its a quadratic equation?
– user1238097
yesterday
2
@user1238097 The distinction has to come from how we interpret each row of this augmented matrix; when $a=-2$, the final row reads as $[0,0,0,-4]$, which in the language of equations reads $0=-4$. Of course, it cannot be that $0=-4$, and that tells us the system of equations we started with was inconsistent (that it had no solutions). Instead, if $a=2$, the final row is $[0,0,0,0]$, which reads $0=0$, which is true but uninformative. This means there is a free variable, and we will have infinitely many solutions.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
1
@user1238097 When $aneq pm 2$, what happens? We could go from row echelon form to reduced row echelon form (since we know we can divide by $a^2-4$ safely), and we will end up with an identity matrix in the left hand portion of the augmented matrix, which means there is a unique solution.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
oh wow that makes a lot of sense definitely.
– user1238097
yesterday
add a comment |
Hint:
A non-homogeneous linear system has solutions if and only if the matrix of the homogeneous side and the augmented matrix have the same rank. Furthermore, this rank is the codimension of the affine space of solutions.
Thus here, there is a unique solution if and only if the matrix $;smash{begin{bmatrix}1&1&-1\ 1&2&1\1&1&a^2-5end{bmatrix}}$ has rank $3$. You can obtain its rank with row reduction.
Thanks for the hint I need to go back to look at homogenous systems section in the book.
– user1238097
yesterday
add a comment |
The standard start:
The matrix is
$begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & -1 & 2\
1 & 2 & 1 & 3\
1 & 1 & a^2-5 & a
end{bmatrix}
$
The 3x3 determinant is
$2(a^2-5)+1-1-(1+(a^2-5)-2)
=a^2-4
$
so,
if $a^2 ne 4$,
there is a unique solution.
So I don't have to the linear equations to solve this wow.
– user1238097
yesterday
1
I take issue with this answer, as it is a bit sloppy; you cannot take the determinant of a $3times 4$ matrix. The approach is nice, but you should clean up your explanation.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
@ImNotTheGuy it is definitely a bit more confusing.
– user1238097
yesterday
2
Non-square matrices don't have a determinant.
– mathreadler
yesterday
OK - I'll fix it.
– marty cohen
yesterday
add a comment |
note: in the original version of the question the answer for part b was subtuly wrong, it should say $a neq pm 2$
I would start by getting rid of x by subtracting one of the cases (I went for the first one) from the other two.
$$ (2y + z)-(y-z) = 3 - 2 $$
$$ (y + (a^2 -5)z) - (y-z) = a - 2 $$
Multiplying out and simplifying.
$$ y + 2z = 1 $$
$$ (a^2 -4)z = a - 2 $$
So how do you solve an equation like that? you would want to divide it through by $(a^2 -4)$ but it is only valid to do that if $(a^2 -4) neq 0$. Some elementary knowlage of quadratics tells us that $(a^2 -4) neq 0$ when $a neq pm 2$. Therefore when $a neq pm 2$ our equation gives a single value for z which in turn gives a single value for y which in turn gives a single value for x.
Ok what about when $a = pm 2$ well since we only have to cases left we can just substitute them in.
$$ 0z = -2 - 2 = -4 $$
$$ 0z = 2 - 2 = 0 $$
The first equation clearly has no soloutions, the second clearly has an infinite soloution set.
fixed that error.
– user1238097
23 hours ago
I am still in the intro portion of the course, but is this method only possible if you know determinants?
– user1238097
12 hours ago
1
The method I used does not involve calculating or knowing about determinants, It's just the elimination method of solving simultaneous equations (which turned out to be unusually simple in this case, because we didn't have to do any scaling before we could perform elimination of x and because y happened to drop out of the third equation at the same time as x) combined with being mindful of the possibility of division by zero.
– Peter Green
2 hours ago
add a comment |
our equations: (a^2 means a * a)
x+y−z=2
x+2y+z=3
x+y+(a^2−5)z=a
general equation form:
a1*x+b1*y+c1*z = d1
a2*x+b2*y+c2*z = d2
a3*x+b3*y+c3*z = d3
matrix A:
a1 b1 c1
a2 b2 c2
a3 b3 c3
matrix B:
d1 b1 c1
d2 b2 c2
d2 b3 c3
matrix C:
a1 d1 c1
a2 d2 c2
a3 d3 c3
matrix D:
a1 b1 d1
a2 b2 d2
a3 b3 d3
x = det(B) / det(A);
y = det(C) / det(A);
z = det(D) / det(A)
matrix A general format:
a11 a12 a13
a21 a22 a23
a31 a32 a33
det(A) = a11*a22*a33 + a12*a23*a31 + a13*a21*32 - a13*a22*a31 - a12*a21*a33 - a11*a23*a32
det(B) = d1*b2*c3 + b1*c2*d3 + c1*d2*b3 - c1*b2*d3 - b1*d2*c3 - d1*c2*b3
det(C) = a1*d2*c3 + d1*c2*a3 + c1*a2*d3 - c1*d2*a3 - d1*a2*c3 - a1*c2*d3
det(D) = a1*b2*d3 + b1*d2*a3+ d1*a2*b3 - d1*b2*a3- b1*a2*d3 - a1*d2*b3
assuming if my math below is correct, we get:
det(A) = a^2 - 4
det(B) = a^2+3a-10
det(C) = a^2-2a
det(D) = a - 2
x = (a^2+3a-10) / (a^2 - 4)
y = (a^2+3a-10) / (a^2 - 4)
z = (a-2)/(a^2 - 4)
If a^2 = 4, then the equation has no solution b/c we can't divide by zero
So, we can't have a = -2 or a = 2
Otherwise, the equation has the unique solution.
New contributor
For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., here, here, here and here
– Kemono Chen
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052338%2fsolve-linear-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Having the matrix in something approaching row echelon form is definitely the right way to go, and you are nearly done once you have it. Unfortunately I think you did your final row operation incorrectly; my row echelon form matrix looks like this:
$$
begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 & -1 & 2\0 & 1 & 2 & 1\ 0 & 0 & a^2-4 & a-2end{bmatrix}
$$
Is this enough to show you the way?
New contributor
I think I get where the a^2 - 4 gives the + or - 2. The not equal is because its a quadratic equation?
– user1238097
yesterday
2
@user1238097 The distinction has to come from how we interpret each row of this augmented matrix; when $a=-2$, the final row reads as $[0,0,0,-4]$, which in the language of equations reads $0=-4$. Of course, it cannot be that $0=-4$, and that tells us the system of equations we started with was inconsistent (that it had no solutions). Instead, if $a=2$, the final row is $[0,0,0,0]$, which reads $0=0$, which is true but uninformative. This means there is a free variable, and we will have infinitely many solutions.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
1
@user1238097 When $aneq pm 2$, what happens? We could go from row echelon form to reduced row echelon form (since we know we can divide by $a^2-4$ safely), and we will end up with an identity matrix in the left hand portion of the augmented matrix, which means there is a unique solution.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
oh wow that makes a lot of sense definitely.
– user1238097
yesterday
add a comment |
Having the matrix in something approaching row echelon form is definitely the right way to go, and you are nearly done once you have it. Unfortunately I think you did your final row operation incorrectly; my row echelon form matrix looks like this:
$$
begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 & -1 & 2\0 & 1 & 2 & 1\ 0 & 0 & a^2-4 & a-2end{bmatrix}
$$
Is this enough to show you the way?
New contributor
I think I get where the a^2 - 4 gives the + or - 2. The not equal is because its a quadratic equation?
– user1238097
yesterday
2
@user1238097 The distinction has to come from how we interpret each row of this augmented matrix; when $a=-2$, the final row reads as $[0,0,0,-4]$, which in the language of equations reads $0=-4$. Of course, it cannot be that $0=-4$, and that tells us the system of equations we started with was inconsistent (that it had no solutions). Instead, if $a=2$, the final row is $[0,0,0,0]$, which reads $0=0$, which is true but uninformative. This means there is a free variable, and we will have infinitely many solutions.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
1
@user1238097 When $aneq pm 2$, what happens? We could go from row echelon form to reduced row echelon form (since we know we can divide by $a^2-4$ safely), and we will end up with an identity matrix in the left hand portion of the augmented matrix, which means there is a unique solution.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
oh wow that makes a lot of sense definitely.
– user1238097
yesterday
add a comment |
Having the matrix in something approaching row echelon form is definitely the right way to go, and you are nearly done once you have it. Unfortunately I think you did your final row operation incorrectly; my row echelon form matrix looks like this:
$$
begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 & -1 & 2\0 & 1 & 2 & 1\ 0 & 0 & a^2-4 & a-2end{bmatrix}
$$
Is this enough to show you the way?
New contributor
Having the matrix in something approaching row echelon form is definitely the right way to go, and you are nearly done once you have it. Unfortunately I think you did your final row operation incorrectly; my row echelon form matrix looks like this:
$$
begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 & -1 & 2\0 & 1 & 2 & 1\ 0 & 0 & a^2-4 & a-2end{bmatrix}
$$
Is this enough to show you the way?
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
ImNotTheGuy
43616
43616
New contributor
New contributor
I think I get where the a^2 - 4 gives the + or - 2. The not equal is because its a quadratic equation?
– user1238097
yesterday
2
@user1238097 The distinction has to come from how we interpret each row of this augmented matrix; when $a=-2$, the final row reads as $[0,0,0,-4]$, which in the language of equations reads $0=-4$. Of course, it cannot be that $0=-4$, and that tells us the system of equations we started with was inconsistent (that it had no solutions). Instead, if $a=2$, the final row is $[0,0,0,0]$, which reads $0=0$, which is true but uninformative. This means there is a free variable, and we will have infinitely many solutions.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
1
@user1238097 When $aneq pm 2$, what happens? We could go from row echelon form to reduced row echelon form (since we know we can divide by $a^2-4$ safely), and we will end up with an identity matrix in the left hand portion of the augmented matrix, which means there is a unique solution.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
oh wow that makes a lot of sense definitely.
– user1238097
yesterday
add a comment |
I think I get where the a^2 - 4 gives the + or - 2. The not equal is because its a quadratic equation?
– user1238097
yesterday
2
@user1238097 The distinction has to come from how we interpret each row of this augmented matrix; when $a=-2$, the final row reads as $[0,0,0,-4]$, which in the language of equations reads $0=-4$. Of course, it cannot be that $0=-4$, and that tells us the system of equations we started with was inconsistent (that it had no solutions). Instead, if $a=2$, the final row is $[0,0,0,0]$, which reads $0=0$, which is true but uninformative. This means there is a free variable, and we will have infinitely many solutions.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
1
@user1238097 When $aneq pm 2$, what happens? We could go from row echelon form to reduced row echelon form (since we know we can divide by $a^2-4$ safely), and we will end up with an identity matrix in the left hand portion of the augmented matrix, which means there is a unique solution.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
oh wow that makes a lot of sense definitely.
– user1238097
yesterday
I think I get where the a^2 - 4 gives the + or - 2. The not equal is because its a quadratic equation?
– user1238097
yesterday
I think I get where the a^2 - 4 gives the + or - 2. The not equal is because its a quadratic equation?
– user1238097
yesterday
2
2
@user1238097 The distinction has to come from how we interpret each row of this augmented matrix; when $a=-2$, the final row reads as $[0,0,0,-4]$, which in the language of equations reads $0=-4$. Of course, it cannot be that $0=-4$, and that tells us the system of equations we started with was inconsistent (that it had no solutions). Instead, if $a=2$, the final row is $[0,0,0,0]$, which reads $0=0$, which is true but uninformative. This means there is a free variable, and we will have infinitely many solutions.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
@user1238097 The distinction has to come from how we interpret each row of this augmented matrix; when $a=-2$, the final row reads as $[0,0,0,-4]$, which in the language of equations reads $0=-4$. Of course, it cannot be that $0=-4$, and that tells us the system of equations we started with was inconsistent (that it had no solutions). Instead, if $a=2$, the final row is $[0,0,0,0]$, which reads $0=0$, which is true but uninformative. This means there is a free variable, and we will have infinitely many solutions.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
1
1
@user1238097 When $aneq pm 2$, what happens? We could go from row echelon form to reduced row echelon form (since we know we can divide by $a^2-4$ safely), and we will end up with an identity matrix in the left hand portion of the augmented matrix, which means there is a unique solution.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
@user1238097 When $aneq pm 2$, what happens? We could go from row echelon form to reduced row echelon form (since we know we can divide by $a^2-4$ safely), and we will end up with an identity matrix in the left hand portion of the augmented matrix, which means there is a unique solution.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
oh wow that makes a lot of sense definitely.
– user1238097
yesterday
oh wow that makes a lot of sense definitely.
– user1238097
yesterday
add a comment |
Hint:
A non-homogeneous linear system has solutions if and only if the matrix of the homogeneous side and the augmented matrix have the same rank. Furthermore, this rank is the codimension of the affine space of solutions.
Thus here, there is a unique solution if and only if the matrix $;smash{begin{bmatrix}1&1&-1\ 1&2&1\1&1&a^2-5end{bmatrix}}$ has rank $3$. You can obtain its rank with row reduction.
Thanks for the hint I need to go back to look at homogenous systems section in the book.
– user1238097
yesterday
add a comment |
Hint:
A non-homogeneous linear system has solutions if and only if the matrix of the homogeneous side and the augmented matrix have the same rank. Furthermore, this rank is the codimension of the affine space of solutions.
Thus here, there is a unique solution if and only if the matrix $;smash{begin{bmatrix}1&1&-1\ 1&2&1\1&1&a^2-5end{bmatrix}}$ has rank $3$. You can obtain its rank with row reduction.
Thanks for the hint I need to go back to look at homogenous systems section in the book.
– user1238097
yesterday
add a comment |
Hint:
A non-homogeneous linear system has solutions if and only if the matrix of the homogeneous side and the augmented matrix have the same rank. Furthermore, this rank is the codimension of the affine space of solutions.
Thus here, there is a unique solution if and only if the matrix $;smash{begin{bmatrix}1&1&-1\ 1&2&1\1&1&a^2-5end{bmatrix}}$ has rank $3$. You can obtain its rank with row reduction.
Hint:
A non-homogeneous linear system has solutions if and only if the matrix of the homogeneous side and the augmented matrix have the same rank. Furthermore, this rank is the codimension of the affine space of solutions.
Thus here, there is a unique solution if and only if the matrix $;smash{begin{bmatrix}1&1&-1\ 1&2&1\1&1&a^2-5end{bmatrix}}$ has rank $3$. You can obtain its rank with row reduction.
answered yesterday
Bernard
118k638112
118k638112
Thanks for the hint I need to go back to look at homogenous systems section in the book.
– user1238097
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for the hint I need to go back to look at homogenous systems section in the book.
– user1238097
yesterday
Thanks for the hint I need to go back to look at homogenous systems section in the book.
– user1238097
yesterday
Thanks for the hint I need to go back to look at homogenous systems section in the book.
– user1238097
yesterday
add a comment |
The standard start:
The matrix is
$begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & -1 & 2\
1 & 2 & 1 & 3\
1 & 1 & a^2-5 & a
end{bmatrix}
$
The 3x3 determinant is
$2(a^2-5)+1-1-(1+(a^2-5)-2)
=a^2-4
$
so,
if $a^2 ne 4$,
there is a unique solution.
So I don't have to the linear equations to solve this wow.
– user1238097
yesterday
1
I take issue with this answer, as it is a bit sloppy; you cannot take the determinant of a $3times 4$ matrix. The approach is nice, but you should clean up your explanation.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
@ImNotTheGuy it is definitely a bit more confusing.
– user1238097
yesterday
2
Non-square matrices don't have a determinant.
– mathreadler
yesterday
OK - I'll fix it.
– marty cohen
yesterday
add a comment |
The standard start:
The matrix is
$begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & -1 & 2\
1 & 2 & 1 & 3\
1 & 1 & a^2-5 & a
end{bmatrix}
$
The 3x3 determinant is
$2(a^2-5)+1-1-(1+(a^2-5)-2)
=a^2-4
$
so,
if $a^2 ne 4$,
there is a unique solution.
So I don't have to the linear equations to solve this wow.
– user1238097
yesterday
1
I take issue with this answer, as it is a bit sloppy; you cannot take the determinant of a $3times 4$ matrix. The approach is nice, but you should clean up your explanation.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
@ImNotTheGuy it is definitely a bit more confusing.
– user1238097
yesterday
2
Non-square matrices don't have a determinant.
– mathreadler
yesterday
OK - I'll fix it.
– marty cohen
yesterday
add a comment |
The standard start:
The matrix is
$begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & -1 & 2\
1 & 2 & 1 & 3\
1 & 1 & a^2-5 & a
end{bmatrix}
$
The 3x3 determinant is
$2(a^2-5)+1-1-(1+(a^2-5)-2)
=a^2-4
$
so,
if $a^2 ne 4$,
there is a unique solution.
The standard start:
The matrix is
$begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & -1 & 2\
1 & 2 & 1 & 3\
1 & 1 & a^2-5 & a
end{bmatrix}
$
The 3x3 determinant is
$2(a^2-5)+1-1-(1+(a^2-5)-2)
=a^2-4
$
so,
if $a^2 ne 4$,
there is a unique solution.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
marty cohen
72.4k549127
72.4k549127
So I don't have to the linear equations to solve this wow.
– user1238097
yesterday
1
I take issue with this answer, as it is a bit sloppy; you cannot take the determinant of a $3times 4$ matrix. The approach is nice, but you should clean up your explanation.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
@ImNotTheGuy it is definitely a bit more confusing.
– user1238097
yesterday
2
Non-square matrices don't have a determinant.
– mathreadler
yesterday
OK - I'll fix it.
– marty cohen
yesterday
add a comment |
So I don't have to the linear equations to solve this wow.
– user1238097
yesterday
1
I take issue with this answer, as it is a bit sloppy; you cannot take the determinant of a $3times 4$ matrix. The approach is nice, but you should clean up your explanation.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
@ImNotTheGuy it is definitely a bit more confusing.
– user1238097
yesterday
2
Non-square matrices don't have a determinant.
– mathreadler
yesterday
OK - I'll fix it.
– marty cohen
yesterday
So I don't have to the linear equations to solve this wow.
– user1238097
yesterday
So I don't have to the linear equations to solve this wow.
– user1238097
yesterday
1
1
I take issue with this answer, as it is a bit sloppy; you cannot take the determinant of a $3times 4$ matrix. The approach is nice, but you should clean up your explanation.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
I take issue with this answer, as it is a bit sloppy; you cannot take the determinant of a $3times 4$ matrix. The approach is nice, but you should clean up your explanation.
– ImNotTheGuy
yesterday
@ImNotTheGuy it is definitely a bit more confusing.
– user1238097
yesterday
@ImNotTheGuy it is definitely a bit more confusing.
– user1238097
yesterday
2
2
Non-square matrices don't have a determinant.
– mathreadler
yesterday
Non-square matrices don't have a determinant.
– mathreadler
yesterday
OK - I'll fix it.
– marty cohen
yesterday
OK - I'll fix it.
– marty cohen
yesterday
add a comment |
note: in the original version of the question the answer for part b was subtuly wrong, it should say $a neq pm 2$
I would start by getting rid of x by subtracting one of the cases (I went for the first one) from the other two.
$$ (2y + z)-(y-z) = 3 - 2 $$
$$ (y + (a^2 -5)z) - (y-z) = a - 2 $$
Multiplying out and simplifying.
$$ y + 2z = 1 $$
$$ (a^2 -4)z = a - 2 $$
So how do you solve an equation like that? you would want to divide it through by $(a^2 -4)$ but it is only valid to do that if $(a^2 -4) neq 0$. Some elementary knowlage of quadratics tells us that $(a^2 -4) neq 0$ when $a neq pm 2$. Therefore when $a neq pm 2$ our equation gives a single value for z which in turn gives a single value for y which in turn gives a single value for x.
Ok what about when $a = pm 2$ well since we only have to cases left we can just substitute them in.
$$ 0z = -2 - 2 = -4 $$
$$ 0z = 2 - 2 = 0 $$
The first equation clearly has no soloutions, the second clearly has an infinite soloution set.
fixed that error.
– user1238097
23 hours ago
I am still in the intro portion of the course, but is this method only possible if you know determinants?
– user1238097
12 hours ago
1
The method I used does not involve calculating or knowing about determinants, It's just the elimination method of solving simultaneous equations (which turned out to be unusually simple in this case, because we didn't have to do any scaling before we could perform elimination of x and because y happened to drop out of the third equation at the same time as x) combined with being mindful of the possibility of division by zero.
– Peter Green
2 hours ago
add a comment |
note: in the original version of the question the answer for part b was subtuly wrong, it should say $a neq pm 2$
I would start by getting rid of x by subtracting one of the cases (I went for the first one) from the other two.
$$ (2y + z)-(y-z) = 3 - 2 $$
$$ (y + (a^2 -5)z) - (y-z) = a - 2 $$
Multiplying out and simplifying.
$$ y + 2z = 1 $$
$$ (a^2 -4)z = a - 2 $$
So how do you solve an equation like that? you would want to divide it through by $(a^2 -4)$ but it is only valid to do that if $(a^2 -4) neq 0$. Some elementary knowlage of quadratics tells us that $(a^2 -4) neq 0$ when $a neq pm 2$. Therefore when $a neq pm 2$ our equation gives a single value for z which in turn gives a single value for y which in turn gives a single value for x.
Ok what about when $a = pm 2$ well since we only have to cases left we can just substitute them in.
$$ 0z = -2 - 2 = -4 $$
$$ 0z = 2 - 2 = 0 $$
The first equation clearly has no soloutions, the second clearly has an infinite soloution set.
fixed that error.
– user1238097
23 hours ago
I am still in the intro portion of the course, but is this method only possible if you know determinants?
– user1238097
12 hours ago
1
The method I used does not involve calculating or knowing about determinants, It's just the elimination method of solving simultaneous equations (which turned out to be unusually simple in this case, because we didn't have to do any scaling before we could perform elimination of x and because y happened to drop out of the third equation at the same time as x) combined with being mindful of the possibility of division by zero.
– Peter Green
2 hours ago
add a comment |
note: in the original version of the question the answer for part b was subtuly wrong, it should say $a neq pm 2$
I would start by getting rid of x by subtracting one of the cases (I went for the first one) from the other two.
$$ (2y + z)-(y-z) = 3 - 2 $$
$$ (y + (a^2 -5)z) - (y-z) = a - 2 $$
Multiplying out and simplifying.
$$ y + 2z = 1 $$
$$ (a^2 -4)z = a - 2 $$
So how do you solve an equation like that? you would want to divide it through by $(a^2 -4)$ but it is only valid to do that if $(a^2 -4) neq 0$. Some elementary knowlage of quadratics tells us that $(a^2 -4) neq 0$ when $a neq pm 2$. Therefore when $a neq pm 2$ our equation gives a single value for z which in turn gives a single value for y which in turn gives a single value for x.
Ok what about when $a = pm 2$ well since we only have to cases left we can just substitute them in.
$$ 0z = -2 - 2 = -4 $$
$$ 0z = 2 - 2 = 0 $$
The first equation clearly has no soloutions, the second clearly has an infinite soloution set.
note: in the original version of the question the answer for part b was subtuly wrong, it should say $a neq pm 2$
I would start by getting rid of x by subtracting one of the cases (I went for the first one) from the other two.
$$ (2y + z)-(y-z) = 3 - 2 $$
$$ (y + (a^2 -5)z) - (y-z) = a - 2 $$
Multiplying out and simplifying.
$$ y + 2z = 1 $$
$$ (a^2 -4)z = a - 2 $$
So how do you solve an equation like that? you would want to divide it through by $(a^2 -4)$ but it is only valid to do that if $(a^2 -4) neq 0$. Some elementary knowlage of quadratics tells us that $(a^2 -4) neq 0$ when $a neq pm 2$. Therefore when $a neq pm 2$ our equation gives a single value for z which in turn gives a single value for y which in turn gives a single value for x.
Ok what about when $a = pm 2$ well since we only have to cases left we can just substitute them in.
$$ 0z = -2 - 2 = -4 $$
$$ 0z = 2 - 2 = 0 $$
The first equation clearly has no soloutions, the second clearly has an infinite soloution set.
edited 23 hours ago
answered yesterday
Peter Green
1,1471510
1,1471510
fixed that error.
– user1238097
23 hours ago
I am still in the intro portion of the course, but is this method only possible if you know determinants?
– user1238097
12 hours ago
1
The method I used does not involve calculating or knowing about determinants, It's just the elimination method of solving simultaneous equations (which turned out to be unusually simple in this case, because we didn't have to do any scaling before we could perform elimination of x and because y happened to drop out of the third equation at the same time as x) combined with being mindful of the possibility of division by zero.
– Peter Green
2 hours ago
add a comment |
fixed that error.
– user1238097
23 hours ago
I am still in the intro portion of the course, but is this method only possible if you know determinants?
– user1238097
12 hours ago
1
The method I used does not involve calculating or knowing about determinants, It's just the elimination method of solving simultaneous equations (which turned out to be unusually simple in this case, because we didn't have to do any scaling before we could perform elimination of x and because y happened to drop out of the third equation at the same time as x) combined with being mindful of the possibility of division by zero.
– Peter Green
2 hours ago
fixed that error.
– user1238097
23 hours ago
fixed that error.
– user1238097
23 hours ago
I am still in the intro portion of the course, but is this method only possible if you know determinants?
– user1238097
12 hours ago
I am still in the intro portion of the course, but is this method only possible if you know determinants?
– user1238097
12 hours ago
1
1
The method I used does not involve calculating or knowing about determinants, It's just the elimination method of solving simultaneous equations (which turned out to be unusually simple in this case, because we didn't have to do any scaling before we could perform elimination of x and because y happened to drop out of the third equation at the same time as x) combined with being mindful of the possibility of division by zero.
– Peter Green
2 hours ago
The method I used does not involve calculating or knowing about determinants, It's just the elimination method of solving simultaneous equations (which turned out to be unusually simple in this case, because we didn't have to do any scaling before we could perform elimination of x and because y happened to drop out of the third equation at the same time as x) combined with being mindful of the possibility of division by zero.
– Peter Green
2 hours ago
add a comment |
our equations: (a^2 means a * a)
x+y−z=2
x+2y+z=3
x+y+(a^2−5)z=a
general equation form:
a1*x+b1*y+c1*z = d1
a2*x+b2*y+c2*z = d2
a3*x+b3*y+c3*z = d3
matrix A:
a1 b1 c1
a2 b2 c2
a3 b3 c3
matrix B:
d1 b1 c1
d2 b2 c2
d2 b3 c3
matrix C:
a1 d1 c1
a2 d2 c2
a3 d3 c3
matrix D:
a1 b1 d1
a2 b2 d2
a3 b3 d3
x = det(B) / det(A);
y = det(C) / det(A);
z = det(D) / det(A)
matrix A general format:
a11 a12 a13
a21 a22 a23
a31 a32 a33
det(A) = a11*a22*a33 + a12*a23*a31 + a13*a21*32 - a13*a22*a31 - a12*a21*a33 - a11*a23*a32
det(B) = d1*b2*c3 + b1*c2*d3 + c1*d2*b3 - c1*b2*d3 - b1*d2*c3 - d1*c2*b3
det(C) = a1*d2*c3 + d1*c2*a3 + c1*a2*d3 - c1*d2*a3 - d1*a2*c3 - a1*c2*d3
det(D) = a1*b2*d3 + b1*d2*a3+ d1*a2*b3 - d1*b2*a3- b1*a2*d3 - a1*d2*b3
assuming if my math below is correct, we get:
det(A) = a^2 - 4
det(B) = a^2+3a-10
det(C) = a^2-2a
det(D) = a - 2
x = (a^2+3a-10) / (a^2 - 4)
y = (a^2+3a-10) / (a^2 - 4)
z = (a-2)/(a^2 - 4)
If a^2 = 4, then the equation has no solution b/c we can't divide by zero
So, we can't have a = -2 or a = 2
Otherwise, the equation has the unique solution.
New contributor
For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., here, here, here and here
– Kemono Chen
yesterday
add a comment |
our equations: (a^2 means a * a)
x+y−z=2
x+2y+z=3
x+y+(a^2−5)z=a
general equation form:
a1*x+b1*y+c1*z = d1
a2*x+b2*y+c2*z = d2
a3*x+b3*y+c3*z = d3
matrix A:
a1 b1 c1
a2 b2 c2
a3 b3 c3
matrix B:
d1 b1 c1
d2 b2 c2
d2 b3 c3
matrix C:
a1 d1 c1
a2 d2 c2
a3 d3 c3
matrix D:
a1 b1 d1
a2 b2 d2
a3 b3 d3
x = det(B) / det(A);
y = det(C) / det(A);
z = det(D) / det(A)
matrix A general format:
a11 a12 a13
a21 a22 a23
a31 a32 a33
det(A) = a11*a22*a33 + a12*a23*a31 + a13*a21*32 - a13*a22*a31 - a12*a21*a33 - a11*a23*a32
det(B) = d1*b2*c3 + b1*c2*d3 + c1*d2*b3 - c1*b2*d3 - b1*d2*c3 - d1*c2*b3
det(C) = a1*d2*c3 + d1*c2*a3 + c1*a2*d3 - c1*d2*a3 - d1*a2*c3 - a1*c2*d3
det(D) = a1*b2*d3 + b1*d2*a3+ d1*a2*b3 - d1*b2*a3- b1*a2*d3 - a1*d2*b3
assuming if my math below is correct, we get:
det(A) = a^2 - 4
det(B) = a^2+3a-10
det(C) = a^2-2a
det(D) = a - 2
x = (a^2+3a-10) / (a^2 - 4)
y = (a^2+3a-10) / (a^2 - 4)
z = (a-2)/(a^2 - 4)
If a^2 = 4, then the equation has no solution b/c we can't divide by zero
So, we can't have a = -2 or a = 2
Otherwise, the equation has the unique solution.
New contributor
For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., here, here, here and here
– Kemono Chen
yesterday
add a comment |
our equations: (a^2 means a * a)
x+y−z=2
x+2y+z=3
x+y+(a^2−5)z=a
general equation form:
a1*x+b1*y+c1*z = d1
a2*x+b2*y+c2*z = d2
a3*x+b3*y+c3*z = d3
matrix A:
a1 b1 c1
a2 b2 c2
a3 b3 c3
matrix B:
d1 b1 c1
d2 b2 c2
d2 b3 c3
matrix C:
a1 d1 c1
a2 d2 c2
a3 d3 c3
matrix D:
a1 b1 d1
a2 b2 d2
a3 b3 d3
x = det(B) / det(A);
y = det(C) / det(A);
z = det(D) / det(A)
matrix A general format:
a11 a12 a13
a21 a22 a23
a31 a32 a33
det(A) = a11*a22*a33 + a12*a23*a31 + a13*a21*32 - a13*a22*a31 - a12*a21*a33 - a11*a23*a32
det(B) = d1*b2*c3 + b1*c2*d3 + c1*d2*b3 - c1*b2*d3 - b1*d2*c3 - d1*c2*b3
det(C) = a1*d2*c3 + d1*c2*a3 + c1*a2*d3 - c1*d2*a3 - d1*a2*c3 - a1*c2*d3
det(D) = a1*b2*d3 + b1*d2*a3+ d1*a2*b3 - d1*b2*a3- b1*a2*d3 - a1*d2*b3
assuming if my math below is correct, we get:
det(A) = a^2 - 4
det(B) = a^2+3a-10
det(C) = a^2-2a
det(D) = a - 2
x = (a^2+3a-10) / (a^2 - 4)
y = (a^2+3a-10) / (a^2 - 4)
z = (a-2)/(a^2 - 4)
If a^2 = 4, then the equation has no solution b/c we can't divide by zero
So, we can't have a = -2 or a = 2
Otherwise, the equation has the unique solution.
New contributor
our equations: (a^2 means a * a)
x+y−z=2
x+2y+z=3
x+y+(a^2−5)z=a
general equation form:
a1*x+b1*y+c1*z = d1
a2*x+b2*y+c2*z = d2
a3*x+b3*y+c3*z = d3
matrix A:
a1 b1 c1
a2 b2 c2
a3 b3 c3
matrix B:
d1 b1 c1
d2 b2 c2
d2 b3 c3
matrix C:
a1 d1 c1
a2 d2 c2
a3 d3 c3
matrix D:
a1 b1 d1
a2 b2 d2
a3 b3 d3
x = det(B) / det(A);
y = det(C) / det(A);
z = det(D) / det(A)
matrix A general format:
a11 a12 a13
a21 a22 a23
a31 a32 a33
det(A) = a11*a22*a33 + a12*a23*a31 + a13*a21*32 - a13*a22*a31 - a12*a21*a33 - a11*a23*a32
det(B) = d1*b2*c3 + b1*c2*d3 + c1*d2*b3 - c1*b2*d3 - b1*d2*c3 - d1*c2*b3
det(C) = a1*d2*c3 + d1*c2*a3 + c1*a2*d3 - c1*d2*a3 - d1*a2*c3 - a1*c2*d3
det(D) = a1*b2*d3 + b1*d2*a3+ d1*a2*b3 - d1*b2*a3- b1*a2*d3 - a1*d2*b3
assuming if my math below is correct, we get:
det(A) = a^2 - 4
det(B) = a^2+3a-10
det(C) = a^2-2a
det(D) = a - 2
x = (a^2+3a-10) / (a^2 - 4)
y = (a^2+3a-10) / (a^2 - 4)
z = (a-2)/(a^2 - 4)
If a^2 = 4, then the equation has no solution b/c we can't divide by zero
So, we can't have a = -2 or a = 2
Otherwise, the equation has the unique solution.
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
user629345
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., here, here, here and here
– Kemono Chen
yesterday
add a comment |
For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., here, here, here and here
– Kemono Chen
yesterday
For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., here, here, here and here
– Kemono Chen
yesterday
For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., here, here, here and here
– Kemono Chen
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052338%2fsolve-linear-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What are $b$ and $c$?
– Bernard
yesterday
@Bernard thats what I am wondering. It is from the text Introductory Linear Algebra with applications 7th edition.
– user1238097
yesterday