Existence of on to continuous map from the closed disc to closed interval












0














This kind of questions is perhaps very familier here but still I'm in trouble to solve it. The problem that I have asked is "Consider closed unit disc in $R^2$ i.e. the set $D$=${$z$in$$C:|z|<=1$$}$ and the closed interval $I=[-1,1]$ .Prove that there does not exist any continuous on to map from $D$ to $I$?"



MY TRY: If possible let $f$ be such on to continuous map from $D$ to $I$. let $f(x)in (-1,1)$ ,For some $xin D$.By continuty ,for some $s>0$ at $f(x)$ if we consider an open ball $B_s(f(x))$ we can find an open set at $x$ in $R^2$ say, $U_x$ such that the second ball is the inverse image of the first ball. This tells us that those $x$ cann't lie at the boundary of the disc as every open sets at the boundaries are not contained in $D$ but $f$ is defined only in $D$. So the image of the boundary is need to be either ${$$-1,1$$}$ or singletons${$$-1$$}$ or ${$$ 1$$}$. The image cann't be ${$$ -1,1 $$}$ as the boundary of $D$ is connected. If the image is ${$ 1$}$ then the inverse image of ${$$-1$$}$ is the set set obtained by removing two sets ,the boundary of $D$ and an open set (inverse image of $(-1,1)$) which is not closed. This also can't be happen as inverse image of closed sets is closed under continuous map!By similar argument we can disprove ${$$-1$$}$ as image of boundary points.



Considering these arguments I'm saying such $f$ does not exist. Have I done correct? If there are any other way to do it, please give me a hint! I have always find hard to solve such problems like "existense of on to or one one continuous map between interval to interval,disc etc", can you suggest me any book or notes regerding those problems? Thanks for reading.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • What about the projection onto the $x$-axis? Isn't it a continous and onto map from $D$ to $I$?
    – Javi
    yesterday








  • 1




    and also on to indeed! oh! I have given wrong statement to prove
    – Subhajit Saha
    yesterday










  • So, definitely my argument is wrong, I said inverse of (-1,1) is open! Here if you consider projection map it is D excluding 1 and -1, open in D,under subspace topology! But I thaught open in $R^2$ , I guess here I made misstake. Isn't it @Javi?
    – Subhajit Saha
    yesterday












  • The inverse image of an open set under a continuous map is always an open subset. Indeed, if you replace $I=[-1,1]$ by its interior $(-1,1)$ the statement does hold, i.e., there is no onto continous map from $D$ to $(-1,1)$ since the continuous image of a compact set is compact ($D$ is compact and $(-1,1)$ is not).
    – Javi
    yesterday








  • 1




    There is a small chance that where you wrote the two words "on to" you should have written "one to one". Then your question would make sense.
    – Ethan Bolker
    yesterday
















0














This kind of questions is perhaps very familier here but still I'm in trouble to solve it. The problem that I have asked is "Consider closed unit disc in $R^2$ i.e. the set $D$=${$z$in$$C:|z|<=1$$}$ and the closed interval $I=[-1,1]$ .Prove that there does not exist any continuous on to map from $D$ to $I$?"



MY TRY: If possible let $f$ be such on to continuous map from $D$ to $I$. let $f(x)in (-1,1)$ ,For some $xin D$.By continuty ,for some $s>0$ at $f(x)$ if we consider an open ball $B_s(f(x))$ we can find an open set at $x$ in $R^2$ say, $U_x$ such that the second ball is the inverse image of the first ball. This tells us that those $x$ cann't lie at the boundary of the disc as every open sets at the boundaries are not contained in $D$ but $f$ is defined only in $D$. So the image of the boundary is need to be either ${$$-1,1$$}$ or singletons${$$-1$$}$ or ${$$ 1$$}$. The image cann't be ${$$ -1,1 $$}$ as the boundary of $D$ is connected. If the image is ${$ 1$}$ then the inverse image of ${$$-1$$}$ is the set set obtained by removing two sets ,the boundary of $D$ and an open set (inverse image of $(-1,1)$) which is not closed. This also can't be happen as inverse image of closed sets is closed under continuous map!By similar argument we can disprove ${$$-1$$}$ as image of boundary points.



Considering these arguments I'm saying such $f$ does not exist. Have I done correct? If there are any other way to do it, please give me a hint! I have always find hard to solve such problems like "existense of on to or one one continuous map between interval to interval,disc etc", can you suggest me any book or notes regerding those problems? Thanks for reading.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • What about the projection onto the $x$-axis? Isn't it a continous and onto map from $D$ to $I$?
    – Javi
    yesterday








  • 1




    and also on to indeed! oh! I have given wrong statement to prove
    – Subhajit Saha
    yesterday










  • So, definitely my argument is wrong, I said inverse of (-1,1) is open! Here if you consider projection map it is D excluding 1 and -1, open in D,under subspace topology! But I thaught open in $R^2$ , I guess here I made misstake. Isn't it @Javi?
    – Subhajit Saha
    yesterday












  • The inverse image of an open set under a continuous map is always an open subset. Indeed, if you replace $I=[-1,1]$ by its interior $(-1,1)$ the statement does hold, i.e., there is no onto continous map from $D$ to $(-1,1)$ since the continuous image of a compact set is compact ($D$ is compact and $(-1,1)$ is not).
    – Javi
    yesterday








  • 1




    There is a small chance that where you wrote the two words "on to" you should have written "one to one". Then your question would make sense.
    – Ethan Bolker
    yesterday














0












0








0







This kind of questions is perhaps very familier here but still I'm in trouble to solve it. The problem that I have asked is "Consider closed unit disc in $R^2$ i.e. the set $D$=${$z$in$$C:|z|<=1$$}$ and the closed interval $I=[-1,1]$ .Prove that there does not exist any continuous on to map from $D$ to $I$?"



MY TRY: If possible let $f$ be such on to continuous map from $D$ to $I$. let $f(x)in (-1,1)$ ,For some $xin D$.By continuty ,for some $s>0$ at $f(x)$ if we consider an open ball $B_s(f(x))$ we can find an open set at $x$ in $R^2$ say, $U_x$ such that the second ball is the inverse image of the first ball. This tells us that those $x$ cann't lie at the boundary of the disc as every open sets at the boundaries are not contained in $D$ but $f$ is defined only in $D$. So the image of the boundary is need to be either ${$$-1,1$$}$ or singletons${$$-1$$}$ or ${$$ 1$$}$. The image cann't be ${$$ -1,1 $$}$ as the boundary of $D$ is connected. If the image is ${$ 1$}$ then the inverse image of ${$$-1$$}$ is the set set obtained by removing two sets ,the boundary of $D$ and an open set (inverse image of $(-1,1)$) which is not closed. This also can't be happen as inverse image of closed sets is closed under continuous map!By similar argument we can disprove ${$$-1$$}$ as image of boundary points.



Considering these arguments I'm saying such $f$ does not exist. Have I done correct? If there are any other way to do it, please give me a hint! I have always find hard to solve such problems like "existense of on to or one one continuous map between interval to interval,disc etc", can you suggest me any book or notes regerding those problems? Thanks for reading.










share|cite|improve this question













This kind of questions is perhaps very familier here but still I'm in trouble to solve it. The problem that I have asked is "Consider closed unit disc in $R^2$ i.e. the set $D$=${$z$in$$C:|z|<=1$$}$ and the closed interval $I=[-1,1]$ .Prove that there does not exist any continuous on to map from $D$ to $I$?"



MY TRY: If possible let $f$ be such on to continuous map from $D$ to $I$. let $f(x)in (-1,1)$ ,For some $xin D$.By continuty ,for some $s>0$ at $f(x)$ if we consider an open ball $B_s(f(x))$ we can find an open set at $x$ in $R^2$ say, $U_x$ such that the second ball is the inverse image of the first ball. This tells us that those $x$ cann't lie at the boundary of the disc as every open sets at the boundaries are not contained in $D$ but $f$ is defined only in $D$. So the image of the boundary is need to be either ${$$-1,1$$}$ or singletons${$$-1$$}$ or ${$$ 1$$}$. The image cann't be ${$$ -1,1 $$}$ as the boundary of $D$ is connected. If the image is ${$ 1$}$ then the inverse image of ${$$-1$$}$ is the set set obtained by removing two sets ,the boundary of $D$ and an open set (inverse image of $(-1,1)$) which is not closed. This also can't be happen as inverse image of closed sets is closed under continuous map!By similar argument we can disprove ${$$-1$$}$ as image of boundary points.



Considering these arguments I'm saying such $f$ does not exist. Have I done correct? If there are any other way to do it, please give me a hint! I have always find hard to solve such problems like "existense of on to or one one continuous map between interval to interval,disc etc", can you suggest me any book or notes regerding those problems? Thanks for reading.







general-topology continuity






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked yesterday









Subhajit Saha

257113




257113












  • What about the projection onto the $x$-axis? Isn't it a continous and onto map from $D$ to $I$?
    – Javi
    yesterday








  • 1




    and also on to indeed! oh! I have given wrong statement to prove
    – Subhajit Saha
    yesterday










  • So, definitely my argument is wrong, I said inverse of (-1,1) is open! Here if you consider projection map it is D excluding 1 and -1, open in D,under subspace topology! But I thaught open in $R^2$ , I guess here I made misstake. Isn't it @Javi?
    – Subhajit Saha
    yesterday












  • The inverse image of an open set under a continuous map is always an open subset. Indeed, if you replace $I=[-1,1]$ by its interior $(-1,1)$ the statement does hold, i.e., there is no onto continous map from $D$ to $(-1,1)$ since the continuous image of a compact set is compact ($D$ is compact and $(-1,1)$ is not).
    – Javi
    yesterday








  • 1




    There is a small chance that where you wrote the two words "on to" you should have written "one to one". Then your question would make sense.
    – Ethan Bolker
    yesterday


















  • What about the projection onto the $x$-axis? Isn't it a continous and onto map from $D$ to $I$?
    – Javi
    yesterday








  • 1




    and also on to indeed! oh! I have given wrong statement to prove
    – Subhajit Saha
    yesterday










  • So, definitely my argument is wrong, I said inverse of (-1,1) is open! Here if you consider projection map it is D excluding 1 and -1, open in D,under subspace topology! But I thaught open in $R^2$ , I guess here I made misstake. Isn't it @Javi?
    – Subhajit Saha
    yesterday












  • The inverse image of an open set under a continuous map is always an open subset. Indeed, if you replace $I=[-1,1]$ by its interior $(-1,1)$ the statement does hold, i.e., there is no onto continous map from $D$ to $(-1,1)$ since the continuous image of a compact set is compact ($D$ is compact and $(-1,1)$ is not).
    – Javi
    yesterday








  • 1




    There is a small chance that where you wrote the two words "on to" you should have written "one to one". Then your question would make sense.
    – Ethan Bolker
    yesterday
















What about the projection onto the $x$-axis? Isn't it a continous and onto map from $D$ to $I$?
– Javi
yesterday






What about the projection onto the $x$-axis? Isn't it a continous and onto map from $D$ to $I$?
– Javi
yesterday






1




1




and also on to indeed! oh! I have given wrong statement to prove
– Subhajit Saha
yesterday




and also on to indeed! oh! I have given wrong statement to prove
– Subhajit Saha
yesterday












So, definitely my argument is wrong, I said inverse of (-1,1) is open! Here if you consider projection map it is D excluding 1 and -1, open in D,under subspace topology! But I thaught open in $R^2$ , I guess here I made misstake. Isn't it @Javi?
– Subhajit Saha
yesterday






So, definitely my argument is wrong, I said inverse of (-1,1) is open! Here if you consider projection map it is D excluding 1 and -1, open in D,under subspace topology! But I thaught open in $R^2$ , I guess here I made misstake. Isn't it @Javi?
– Subhajit Saha
yesterday














The inverse image of an open set under a continuous map is always an open subset. Indeed, if you replace $I=[-1,1]$ by its interior $(-1,1)$ the statement does hold, i.e., there is no onto continous map from $D$ to $(-1,1)$ since the continuous image of a compact set is compact ($D$ is compact and $(-1,1)$ is not).
– Javi
yesterday






The inverse image of an open set under a continuous map is always an open subset. Indeed, if you replace $I=[-1,1]$ by its interior $(-1,1)$ the statement does hold, i.e., there is no onto continous map from $D$ to $(-1,1)$ since the continuous image of a compact set is compact ($D$ is compact and $(-1,1)$ is not).
– Javi
yesterday






1




1




There is a small chance that where you wrote the two words "on to" you should have written "one to one". Then your question would make sense.
– Ethan Bolker
yesterday




There is a small chance that where you wrote the two words "on to" you should have written "one to one". Then your question would make sense.
– Ethan Bolker
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














The original statement is wrong. Just consider the projection onto de $x$-axis $p:Dto I$ defined as $p(x,y)=x$, which is clearly a continous onto map.



If you replace $I$ by its interior $(-1,1)$ the statement does hold since the continuous image of a compact set must be compact, but $D$ is compact and $(-1,1)$ is not.



In your argument you assumed that an open subset of $D$ cannot touch de boundary, but it can. Open subsets of $D$ with the subspace topology are intersections of open sets of $mathbb{R}^2$ with $D$. Consider the right half-plane in $mathbb{R}^2$. Its intersection with $D$ is the right half-disc, which obviously includes the right half-boundary. This is indeed $p^{-1}((0,1])$.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    yes!i apologiies. thanks
    – Subhajit Saha
    yesterday











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052078%2fexistence-of-on-to-continuous-map-from-the-closed-disc-to-closed-interval%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














The original statement is wrong. Just consider the projection onto de $x$-axis $p:Dto I$ defined as $p(x,y)=x$, which is clearly a continous onto map.



If you replace $I$ by its interior $(-1,1)$ the statement does hold since the continuous image of a compact set must be compact, but $D$ is compact and $(-1,1)$ is not.



In your argument you assumed that an open subset of $D$ cannot touch de boundary, but it can. Open subsets of $D$ with the subspace topology are intersections of open sets of $mathbb{R}^2$ with $D$. Consider the right half-plane in $mathbb{R}^2$. Its intersection with $D$ is the right half-disc, which obviously includes the right half-boundary. This is indeed $p^{-1}((0,1])$.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    yes!i apologiies. thanks
    – Subhajit Saha
    yesterday
















3














The original statement is wrong. Just consider the projection onto de $x$-axis $p:Dto I$ defined as $p(x,y)=x$, which is clearly a continous onto map.



If you replace $I$ by its interior $(-1,1)$ the statement does hold since the continuous image of a compact set must be compact, but $D$ is compact and $(-1,1)$ is not.



In your argument you assumed that an open subset of $D$ cannot touch de boundary, but it can. Open subsets of $D$ with the subspace topology are intersections of open sets of $mathbb{R}^2$ with $D$. Consider the right half-plane in $mathbb{R}^2$. Its intersection with $D$ is the right half-disc, which obviously includes the right half-boundary. This is indeed $p^{-1}((0,1])$.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    yes!i apologiies. thanks
    – Subhajit Saha
    yesterday














3












3








3






The original statement is wrong. Just consider the projection onto de $x$-axis $p:Dto I$ defined as $p(x,y)=x$, which is clearly a continous onto map.



If you replace $I$ by its interior $(-1,1)$ the statement does hold since the continuous image of a compact set must be compact, but $D$ is compact and $(-1,1)$ is not.



In your argument you assumed that an open subset of $D$ cannot touch de boundary, but it can. Open subsets of $D$ with the subspace topology are intersections of open sets of $mathbb{R}^2$ with $D$. Consider the right half-plane in $mathbb{R}^2$. Its intersection with $D$ is the right half-disc, which obviously includes the right half-boundary. This is indeed $p^{-1}((0,1])$.






share|cite|improve this answer














The original statement is wrong. Just consider the projection onto de $x$-axis $p:Dto I$ defined as $p(x,y)=x$, which is clearly a continous onto map.



If you replace $I$ by its interior $(-1,1)$ the statement does hold since the continuous image of a compact set must be compact, but $D$ is compact and $(-1,1)$ is not.



In your argument you assumed that an open subset of $D$ cannot touch de boundary, but it can. Open subsets of $D$ with the subspace topology are intersections of open sets of $mathbb{R}^2$ with $D$. Consider the right half-plane in $mathbb{R}^2$. Its intersection with $D$ is the right half-disc, which obviously includes the right half-boundary. This is indeed $p^{-1}((0,1])$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









Javi

2,5262826




2,5262826








  • 1




    yes!i apologiies. thanks
    – Subhajit Saha
    yesterday














  • 1




    yes!i apologiies. thanks
    – Subhajit Saha
    yesterday








1




1




yes!i apologiies. thanks
– Subhajit Saha
yesterday




yes!i apologiies. thanks
– Subhajit Saha
yesterday


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052078%2fexistence-of-on-to-continuous-map-from-the-closed-disc-to-closed-interval%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg