Who decides who can enter a jointly owned property?
My partner and I are going through an acrimonious separation. I was forced out of our jointly owned house but am about to return until such time as we can sell it. He wanted to buy me out but has been so vile that I've decided not allow him. My concern is that while we are co-habiting the house, I will be subject to visits from his family who were pivotal in the breakdown of our relationship. Can I block their access?
united-kingdom
add a comment |
My partner and I are going through an acrimonious separation. I was forced out of our jointly owned house but am about to return until such time as we can sell it. He wanted to buy me out but has been so vile that I've decided not allow him. My concern is that while we are co-habiting the house, I will be subject to visits from his family who were pivotal in the breakdown of our relationship. Can I block their access?
united-kingdom
4
Beware that you sound like you're trying to cut your nose off to spite your face.
– Loren Pechtel
9 hours ago
I offered him the opportunity to see if he could buy me out. He then got two way too low valuations done in my absence which would’ve seen me about £20k out of pocket.
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago
1
Since he''d be buying you out, it's your job to get the valuation. As things a now, you're simply throwing rocks at his valuation. As well you might, since he has a conflict of interest. When it's entirely your people working for you, then you can believe it.
– Harper
3 hours ago
add a comment |
My partner and I are going through an acrimonious separation. I was forced out of our jointly owned house but am about to return until such time as we can sell it. He wanted to buy me out but has been so vile that I've decided not allow him. My concern is that while we are co-habiting the house, I will be subject to visits from his family who were pivotal in the breakdown of our relationship. Can I block their access?
united-kingdom
My partner and I are going through an acrimonious separation. I was forced out of our jointly owned house but am about to return until such time as we can sell it. He wanted to buy me out but has been so vile that I've decided not allow him. My concern is that while we are co-habiting the house, I will be subject to visits from his family who were pivotal in the breakdown of our relationship. Can I block their access?
united-kingdom
united-kingdom
asked 16 hours ago
Deborah Cameron
211
211
4
Beware that you sound like you're trying to cut your nose off to spite your face.
– Loren Pechtel
9 hours ago
I offered him the opportunity to see if he could buy me out. He then got two way too low valuations done in my absence which would’ve seen me about £20k out of pocket.
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago
1
Since he''d be buying you out, it's your job to get the valuation. As things a now, you're simply throwing rocks at his valuation. As well you might, since he has a conflict of interest. When it's entirely your people working for you, then you can believe it.
– Harper
3 hours ago
add a comment |
4
Beware that you sound like you're trying to cut your nose off to spite your face.
– Loren Pechtel
9 hours ago
I offered him the opportunity to see if he could buy me out. He then got two way too low valuations done in my absence which would’ve seen me about £20k out of pocket.
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago
1
Since he''d be buying you out, it's your job to get the valuation. As things a now, you're simply throwing rocks at his valuation. As well you might, since he has a conflict of interest. When it's entirely your people working for you, then you can believe it.
– Harper
3 hours ago
4
4
Beware that you sound like you're trying to cut your nose off to spite your face.
– Loren Pechtel
9 hours ago
Beware that you sound like you're trying to cut your nose off to spite your face.
– Loren Pechtel
9 hours ago
I offered him the opportunity to see if he could buy me out. He then got two way too low valuations done in my absence which would’ve seen me about £20k out of pocket.
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago
I offered him the opportunity to see if he could buy me out. He then got two way too low valuations done in my absence which would’ve seen me about £20k out of pocket.
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago
1
1
Since he''d be buying you out, it's your job to get the valuation. As things a now, you're simply throwing rocks at his valuation. As well you might, since he has a conflict of interest. When it's entirely your people working for you, then you can believe it.
– Harper
3 hours ago
Since he''d be buying you out, it's your job to get the valuation. As things a now, you're simply throwing rocks at his valuation. As well you might, since he has a conflict of interest. When it's entirely your people working for you, then you can believe it.
– Harper
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Joint tenancy means that you both have equal (full) rights to the entire property, so just as you don't his permission to live there or to invite guests, he doesn't either. Unless they threaten you in some way (and you get a court order barring them from entering), there is no legal means to deprive an owner of their property rights, while they are still an owner.
1
Disappointing, but thank you.
– Deborah Cameron
15 hours ago
2
Why does the right to invite guests trump the right(?) to keep people off your property?
– pipe
12 hours ago
6
@pipe: you forego that right when you entered a joint-ownership situation.
– whatsisname
9 hours ago
1
@pipe because in many states, if they allowed one owner to unilaterally eject people it would cause a grey area with trespassing laws, and by extension open up a huge can of worms when it comes to defense of the home.
– Logarr
8 hours ago
This sounds pretty petty but, as I said, it’s been very acrimonious. How about him using my solely owned property to entertain them? Around 80% of everything in the house is mine - from the chairs they'd sit on to the cups they’d drink from...
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35635%2fwho-decides-who-can-enter-a-jointly-owned-property%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Joint tenancy means that you both have equal (full) rights to the entire property, so just as you don't his permission to live there or to invite guests, he doesn't either. Unless they threaten you in some way (and you get a court order barring them from entering), there is no legal means to deprive an owner of their property rights, while they are still an owner.
1
Disappointing, but thank you.
– Deborah Cameron
15 hours ago
2
Why does the right to invite guests trump the right(?) to keep people off your property?
– pipe
12 hours ago
6
@pipe: you forego that right when you entered a joint-ownership situation.
– whatsisname
9 hours ago
1
@pipe because in many states, if they allowed one owner to unilaterally eject people it would cause a grey area with trespassing laws, and by extension open up a huge can of worms when it comes to defense of the home.
– Logarr
8 hours ago
This sounds pretty petty but, as I said, it’s been very acrimonious. How about him using my solely owned property to entertain them? Around 80% of everything in the house is mine - from the chairs they'd sit on to the cups they’d drink from...
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Joint tenancy means that you both have equal (full) rights to the entire property, so just as you don't his permission to live there or to invite guests, he doesn't either. Unless they threaten you in some way (and you get a court order barring them from entering), there is no legal means to deprive an owner of their property rights, while they are still an owner.
1
Disappointing, but thank you.
– Deborah Cameron
15 hours ago
2
Why does the right to invite guests trump the right(?) to keep people off your property?
– pipe
12 hours ago
6
@pipe: you forego that right when you entered a joint-ownership situation.
– whatsisname
9 hours ago
1
@pipe because in many states, if they allowed one owner to unilaterally eject people it would cause a grey area with trespassing laws, and by extension open up a huge can of worms when it comes to defense of the home.
– Logarr
8 hours ago
This sounds pretty petty but, as I said, it’s been very acrimonious. How about him using my solely owned property to entertain them? Around 80% of everything in the house is mine - from the chairs they'd sit on to the cups they’d drink from...
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Joint tenancy means that you both have equal (full) rights to the entire property, so just as you don't his permission to live there or to invite guests, he doesn't either. Unless they threaten you in some way (and you get a court order barring them from entering), there is no legal means to deprive an owner of their property rights, while they are still an owner.
Joint tenancy means that you both have equal (full) rights to the entire property, so just as you don't his permission to live there or to invite guests, he doesn't either. Unless they threaten you in some way (and you get a court order barring them from entering), there is no legal means to deprive an owner of their property rights, while they are still an owner.
answered 16 hours ago
user6726
56.1k44796
56.1k44796
1
Disappointing, but thank you.
– Deborah Cameron
15 hours ago
2
Why does the right to invite guests trump the right(?) to keep people off your property?
– pipe
12 hours ago
6
@pipe: you forego that right when you entered a joint-ownership situation.
– whatsisname
9 hours ago
1
@pipe because in many states, if they allowed one owner to unilaterally eject people it would cause a grey area with trespassing laws, and by extension open up a huge can of worms when it comes to defense of the home.
– Logarr
8 hours ago
This sounds pretty petty but, as I said, it’s been very acrimonious. How about him using my solely owned property to entertain them? Around 80% of everything in the house is mine - from the chairs they'd sit on to the cups they’d drink from...
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
1
Disappointing, but thank you.
– Deborah Cameron
15 hours ago
2
Why does the right to invite guests trump the right(?) to keep people off your property?
– pipe
12 hours ago
6
@pipe: you forego that right when you entered a joint-ownership situation.
– whatsisname
9 hours ago
1
@pipe because in many states, if they allowed one owner to unilaterally eject people it would cause a grey area with trespassing laws, and by extension open up a huge can of worms when it comes to defense of the home.
– Logarr
8 hours ago
This sounds pretty petty but, as I said, it’s been very acrimonious. How about him using my solely owned property to entertain them? Around 80% of everything in the house is mine - from the chairs they'd sit on to the cups they’d drink from...
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago
1
1
Disappointing, but thank you.
– Deborah Cameron
15 hours ago
Disappointing, but thank you.
– Deborah Cameron
15 hours ago
2
2
Why does the right to invite guests trump the right(?) to keep people off your property?
– pipe
12 hours ago
Why does the right to invite guests trump the right(?) to keep people off your property?
– pipe
12 hours ago
6
6
@pipe: you forego that right when you entered a joint-ownership situation.
– whatsisname
9 hours ago
@pipe: you forego that right when you entered a joint-ownership situation.
– whatsisname
9 hours ago
1
1
@pipe because in many states, if they allowed one owner to unilaterally eject people it would cause a grey area with trespassing laws, and by extension open up a huge can of worms when it comes to defense of the home.
– Logarr
8 hours ago
@pipe because in many states, if they allowed one owner to unilaterally eject people it would cause a grey area with trespassing laws, and by extension open up a huge can of worms when it comes to defense of the home.
– Logarr
8 hours ago
This sounds pretty petty but, as I said, it’s been very acrimonious. How about him using my solely owned property to entertain them? Around 80% of everything in the house is mine - from the chairs they'd sit on to the cups they’d drink from...
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago
This sounds pretty petty but, as I said, it’s been very acrimonious. How about him using my solely owned property to entertain them? Around 80% of everything in the house is mine - from the chairs they'd sit on to the cups they’d drink from...
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35635%2fwho-decides-who-can-enter-a-jointly-owned-property%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
Beware that you sound like you're trying to cut your nose off to spite your face.
– Loren Pechtel
9 hours ago
I offered him the opportunity to see if he could buy me out. He then got two way too low valuations done in my absence which would’ve seen me about £20k out of pocket.
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago
1
Since he''d be buying you out, it's your job to get the valuation. As things a now, you're simply throwing rocks at his valuation. As well you might, since he has a conflict of interest. When it's entirely your people working for you, then you can believe it.
– Harper
3 hours ago