Who decides who can enter a jointly owned property?












4














My partner and I are going through an acrimonious separation. I was forced out of our jointly owned house but am about to return until such time as we can sell it. He wanted to buy me out but has been so vile that I've decided not allow him. My concern is that while we are co-habiting the house, I will be subject to visits from his family who were pivotal in the breakdown of our relationship. Can I block their access?






united-kingdom







share|improve this question


















  • 4




    Beware that you sound like you're trying to cut your nose off to spite your face.
    – Loren Pechtel
    9 hours ago










  • I offered him the opportunity to see if he could buy me out. He then got two way too low valuations done in my absence which would’ve seen me about £20k out of pocket.
    – Deborah Cameron
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    Since he''d be buying you out, it's your job to get the valuation. As things a now, you're simply throwing rocks at his valuation. As well you might, since he has a conflict of interest. When it's entirely your people working for you, then you can believe it.
    – Harper
    3 hours ago
















4














My partner and I are going through an acrimonious separation. I was forced out of our jointly owned house but am about to return until such time as we can sell it. He wanted to buy me out but has been so vile that I've decided not allow him. My concern is that while we are co-habiting the house, I will be subject to visits from his family who were pivotal in the breakdown of our relationship. Can I block their access?






united-kingdom







share|improve this question


















  • 4




    Beware that you sound like you're trying to cut your nose off to spite your face.
    – Loren Pechtel
    9 hours ago










  • I offered him the opportunity to see if he could buy me out. He then got two way too low valuations done in my absence which would’ve seen me about £20k out of pocket.
    – Deborah Cameron
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    Since he''d be buying you out, it's your job to get the valuation. As things a now, you're simply throwing rocks at his valuation. As well you might, since he has a conflict of interest. When it's entirely your people working for you, then you can believe it.
    – Harper
    3 hours ago














4












4








4







My partner and I are going through an acrimonious separation. I was forced out of our jointly owned house but am about to return until such time as we can sell it. He wanted to buy me out but has been so vile that I've decided not allow him. My concern is that while we are co-habiting the house, I will be subject to visits from his family who were pivotal in the breakdown of our relationship. Can I block their access?






united-kingdom







share|improve this question













My partner and I are going through an acrimonious separation. I was forced out of our jointly owned house but am about to return until such time as we can sell it. He wanted to buy me out but has been so vile that I've decided not allow him. My concern is that while we are co-habiting the house, I will be subject to visits from his family who were pivotal in the breakdown of our relationship. Can I block their access?






united-kingdom




united-kingdom






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 16 hours ago









Deborah Cameron

211




211








  • 4




    Beware that you sound like you're trying to cut your nose off to spite your face.
    – Loren Pechtel
    9 hours ago










  • I offered him the opportunity to see if he could buy me out. He then got two way too low valuations done in my absence which would’ve seen me about £20k out of pocket.
    – Deborah Cameron
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    Since he''d be buying you out, it's your job to get the valuation. As things a now, you're simply throwing rocks at his valuation. As well you might, since he has a conflict of interest. When it's entirely your people working for you, then you can believe it.
    – Harper
    3 hours ago














  • 4




    Beware that you sound like you're trying to cut your nose off to spite your face.
    – Loren Pechtel
    9 hours ago










  • I offered him the opportunity to see if he could buy me out. He then got two way too low valuations done in my absence which would’ve seen me about £20k out of pocket.
    – Deborah Cameron
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    Since he''d be buying you out, it's your job to get the valuation. As things a now, you're simply throwing rocks at his valuation. As well you might, since he has a conflict of interest. When it's entirely your people working for you, then you can believe it.
    – Harper
    3 hours ago








4




4




Beware that you sound like you're trying to cut your nose off to spite your face.
– Loren Pechtel
9 hours ago




Beware that you sound like you're trying to cut your nose off to spite your face.
– Loren Pechtel
9 hours ago












I offered him the opportunity to see if he could buy me out. He then got two way too low valuations done in my absence which would’ve seen me about £20k out of pocket.
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago




I offered him the opportunity to see if he could buy me out. He then got two way too low valuations done in my absence which would’ve seen me about £20k out of pocket.
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago




1




1




Since he''d be buying you out, it's your job to get the valuation. As things a now, you're simply throwing rocks at his valuation. As well you might, since he has a conflict of interest. When it's entirely your people working for you, then you can believe it.
– Harper
3 hours ago




Since he''d be buying you out, it's your job to get the valuation. As things a now, you're simply throwing rocks at his valuation. As well you might, since he has a conflict of interest. When it's entirely your people working for you, then you can believe it.
– Harper
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8














Joint tenancy means that you both have equal (full) rights to the entire property, so just as you don't his permission to live there or to invite guests, he doesn't either. Unless they threaten you in some way (and you get a court order barring them from entering), there is no legal means to deprive an owner of their property rights, while they are still an owner.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Disappointing, but thank you.
    – Deborah Cameron
    15 hours ago






  • 2




    Why does the right to invite guests trump the right(?) to keep people off your property?
    – pipe
    12 hours ago






  • 6




    @pipe: you forego that right when you entered a joint-ownership situation.
    – whatsisname
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    @pipe because in many states, if they allowed one owner to unilaterally eject people it would cause a grey area with trespassing laws, and by extension open up a huge can of worms when it comes to defense of the home.
    – Logarr
    8 hours ago










  • This sounds pretty petty but, as I said, it’s been very acrimonious. How about him using my solely owned property to entertain them? Around 80% of everything in the house is mine - from the chairs they'd sit on to the cups they’d drink from...
    – Deborah Cameron
    7 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35635%2fwho-decides-who-can-enter-a-jointly-owned-property%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8














Joint tenancy means that you both have equal (full) rights to the entire property, so just as you don't his permission to live there or to invite guests, he doesn't either. Unless they threaten you in some way (and you get a court order barring them from entering), there is no legal means to deprive an owner of their property rights, while they are still an owner.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Disappointing, but thank you.
    – Deborah Cameron
    15 hours ago






  • 2




    Why does the right to invite guests trump the right(?) to keep people off your property?
    – pipe
    12 hours ago






  • 6




    @pipe: you forego that right when you entered a joint-ownership situation.
    – whatsisname
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    @pipe because in many states, if they allowed one owner to unilaterally eject people it would cause a grey area with trespassing laws, and by extension open up a huge can of worms when it comes to defense of the home.
    – Logarr
    8 hours ago










  • This sounds pretty petty but, as I said, it’s been very acrimonious. How about him using my solely owned property to entertain them? Around 80% of everything in the house is mine - from the chairs they'd sit on to the cups they’d drink from...
    – Deborah Cameron
    7 hours ago
















8














Joint tenancy means that you both have equal (full) rights to the entire property, so just as you don't his permission to live there or to invite guests, he doesn't either. Unless they threaten you in some way (and you get a court order barring them from entering), there is no legal means to deprive an owner of their property rights, while they are still an owner.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Disappointing, but thank you.
    – Deborah Cameron
    15 hours ago






  • 2




    Why does the right to invite guests trump the right(?) to keep people off your property?
    – pipe
    12 hours ago






  • 6




    @pipe: you forego that right when you entered a joint-ownership situation.
    – whatsisname
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    @pipe because in many states, if they allowed one owner to unilaterally eject people it would cause a grey area with trespassing laws, and by extension open up a huge can of worms when it comes to defense of the home.
    – Logarr
    8 hours ago










  • This sounds pretty petty but, as I said, it’s been very acrimonious. How about him using my solely owned property to entertain them? Around 80% of everything in the house is mine - from the chairs they'd sit on to the cups they’d drink from...
    – Deborah Cameron
    7 hours ago














8












8








8






Joint tenancy means that you both have equal (full) rights to the entire property, so just as you don't his permission to live there or to invite guests, he doesn't either. Unless they threaten you in some way (and you get a court order barring them from entering), there is no legal means to deprive an owner of their property rights, while they are still an owner.






share|improve this answer












Joint tenancy means that you both have equal (full) rights to the entire property, so just as you don't his permission to live there or to invite guests, he doesn't either. Unless they threaten you in some way (and you get a court order barring them from entering), there is no legal means to deprive an owner of their property rights, while they are still an owner.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 16 hours ago









user6726

56.1k44796




56.1k44796








  • 1




    Disappointing, but thank you.
    – Deborah Cameron
    15 hours ago






  • 2




    Why does the right to invite guests trump the right(?) to keep people off your property?
    – pipe
    12 hours ago






  • 6




    @pipe: you forego that right when you entered a joint-ownership situation.
    – whatsisname
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    @pipe because in many states, if they allowed one owner to unilaterally eject people it would cause a grey area with trespassing laws, and by extension open up a huge can of worms when it comes to defense of the home.
    – Logarr
    8 hours ago










  • This sounds pretty petty but, as I said, it’s been very acrimonious. How about him using my solely owned property to entertain them? Around 80% of everything in the house is mine - from the chairs they'd sit on to the cups they’d drink from...
    – Deborah Cameron
    7 hours ago














  • 1




    Disappointing, but thank you.
    – Deborah Cameron
    15 hours ago






  • 2




    Why does the right to invite guests trump the right(?) to keep people off your property?
    – pipe
    12 hours ago






  • 6




    @pipe: you forego that right when you entered a joint-ownership situation.
    – whatsisname
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    @pipe because in many states, if they allowed one owner to unilaterally eject people it would cause a grey area with trespassing laws, and by extension open up a huge can of worms when it comes to defense of the home.
    – Logarr
    8 hours ago










  • This sounds pretty petty but, as I said, it’s been very acrimonious. How about him using my solely owned property to entertain them? Around 80% of everything in the house is mine - from the chairs they'd sit on to the cups they’d drink from...
    – Deborah Cameron
    7 hours ago








1




1




Disappointing, but thank you.
– Deborah Cameron
15 hours ago




Disappointing, but thank you.
– Deborah Cameron
15 hours ago




2




2




Why does the right to invite guests trump the right(?) to keep people off your property?
– pipe
12 hours ago




Why does the right to invite guests trump the right(?) to keep people off your property?
– pipe
12 hours ago




6




6




@pipe: you forego that right when you entered a joint-ownership situation.
– whatsisname
9 hours ago




@pipe: you forego that right when you entered a joint-ownership situation.
– whatsisname
9 hours ago




1




1




@pipe because in many states, if they allowed one owner to unilaterally eject people it would cause a grey area with trespassing laws, and by extension open up a huge can of worms when it comes to defense of the home.
– Logarr
8 hours ago




@pipe because in many states, if they allowed one owner to unilaterally eject people it would cause a grey area with trespassing laws, and by extension open up a huge can of worms when it comes to defense of the home.
– Logarr
8 hours ago












This sounds pretty petty but, as I said, it’s been very acrimonious. How about him using my solely owned property to entertain them? Around 80% of everything in the house is mine - from the chairs they'd sit on to the cups they’d drink from...
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago




This sounds pretty petty but, as I said, it’s been very acrimonious. How about him using my solely owned property to entertain them? Around 80% of everything in the house is mine - from the chairs they'd sit on to the cups they’d drink from...
– Deborah Cameron
7 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35635%2fwho-decides-who-can-enter-a-jointly-owned-property%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Image
Human spaceflight From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search "Space traveler" redirects here. For other uses, see Space traveler (disambiguation). @media all and (max-width:720px){.mw-parser-output .tmulti>.thumbinner{width:100%!important;max-width:none!important}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .tsingle{float:none!important;max-width:none!important;width:100%!important;text-align:center}} Apollo 11 crewmember Buzz Aldrin on the Moon, 1969 International Space Station crewmember Tracy Caldwell Dyson views the Earth, 2010 Space Shuttle Discovery heads into space with a crew aboard, STS-121 in 2006 Inside a space suit on the Canadarm, 1993 Human spaceflight (also referred to as crewed spaceflight or manned spaceflight ) is space travel with a crew or passengers aboard the spacecraft. Spacecraft carrying people may be operated directly, by human crew, or it may be e
Read more

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

Image
0 1 What exactly does the error message beginning with E: mean? I assume it has to do with the file structure on Ubuntu-on-Windows, but what exactly? The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required: os-prober Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove it. The following extra packages will be installed: libxslt1.1 The following NEW packages will be installed: libxslt1.1 xmlstarlet 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 435 kB of archives. After this operation, 1023 kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main libxslt1.1 amd64 1.1.28-2build1 [145 kB] Get:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/universe xmlstarlet amd64 1.5.0-1 [290 kB]
Read more

File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg

Image
File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search File File history File usage No higher resolution available. DeusFollowingSea.jpg ‎ (238 × 211 pixels, file size: 12 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg ) Summary [ edit ] Media data and Non-free use rationale Description Cover art of the Deus CD Following Sea Author or copyright owner Deus Source (WP:NFCC#4) rocksucker.co.uk Date of publication 2012 Use in article (WP:NFCC#7) Following Sea Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8) to serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question. Not replaceable with free media because (WP:NFCC#1) n.a. Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3) Low res image used in infobox of the article on the album Respect for commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2) n.a. Fair use Fair use of co
Read more