critical points of a map
Let $mathcal{C}$ be the $mathbb{R}^2$ submanifold defined by:
$y^2 = x(x − 1)(x − a)$ where $a>1$.
Let $f: mathcal{C} rightarrow mathbb{R}^2: (x,y) rightarrow x$
Find the critical point of $f$.
We have $partial_x f=1$ and $partial_y f=0$, which means that f has no critical points because its gradient is non zero.
On the other hand, I know that $f$ has 3 critical points in $(0,0), (1,0), (a,0)$. How to explain this contradiction?
Thank you for your help!
differential-geometry
add a comment |
Let $mathcal{C}$ be the $mathbb{R}^2$ submanifold defined by:
$y^2 = x(x − 1)(x − a)$ where $a>1$.
Let $f: mathcal{C} rightarrow mathbb{R}^2: (x,y) rightarrow x$
Find the critical point of $f$.
We have $partial_x f=1$ and $partial_y f=0$, which means that f has no critical points because its gradient is non zero.
On the other hand, I know that $f$ has 3 critical points in $(0,0), (1,0), (a,0)$. How to explain this contradiction?
Thank you for your help!
differential-geometry
add a comment |
Let $mathcal{C}$ be the $mathbb{R}^2$ submanifold defined by:
$y^2 = x(x − 1)(x − a)$ where $a>1$.
Let $f: mathcal{C} rightarrow mathbb{R}^2: (x,y) rightarrow x$
Find the critical point of $f$.
We have $partial_x f=1$ and $partial_y f=0$, which means that f has no critical points because its gradient is non zero.
On the other hand, I know that $f$ has 3 critical points in $(0,0), (1,0), (a,0)$. How to explain this contradiction?
Thank you for your help!
differential-geometry
Let $mathcal{C}$ be the $mathbb{R}^2$ submanifold defined by:
$y^2 = x(x − 1)(x − a)$ where $a>1$.
Let $f: mathcal{C} rightarrow mathbb{R}^2: (x,y) rightarrow x$
Find the critical point of $f$.
We have $partial_x f=1$ and $partial_y f=0$, which means that f has no critical points because its gradient is non zero.
On the other hand, I know that $f$ has 3 critical points in $(0,0), (1,0), (a,0)$. How to explain this contradiction?
Thank you for your help!
differential-geometry
differential-geometry
asked Dec 24 at 20:15
PerelMan
509111
509111
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Let $gcolonmathbb{R}^2tomathbb{R}$ defined by $g(x,y)=x$.
What you have shown is that $g$ has no critical point, however $f=g_{vert C}$ may have critical points!
Keep in mind that:
A regular map $hcolon Mrightarrow N$ restricted to a submanifold $S$ of $M$ may no longer be regular.
Example. The height function on $mathbb{R}^3$ has no critical point, however its restriction to the unit sphere $S^2$ has two critical points, the north pole and the south pole, at those points the tangent plane of $S^2$ has constant altitude.
The general phenomena is that at a point $pin M$, the linear map $T_phcolon T_pSto T_{f(p)}N$ may no longer be surjective, since $T_pS$ does not contain all the directions of $T_pM$.
When $N=mathbb{R}$, we are looking at points $p$, where $T_ph(T_pS)={0}$, since $T_ph$ is a linear form and it is surjective if and only if nonzero.
In your case, you are looking at point $(x,y)in C$ such that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$, this happens at the points $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$ and $(a,0)$.
Since $C$ is defined by the equation $varphi(x,y)=y^2-x(x-1)(x-a)=0$, the tangent line of $C$ at $(x,y)$ is given by $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi^perp$, so that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice if and only if $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi$ has no $y$-component.
Compute $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi=(-3x^2+2(a+1)x-a,2y)$, it has no $y$-component if and only if $y=0$.
Finally, the critical points of $f$ are the $(x,0)in C$, but $(x,0)in C$ if and only if $x=0,1,a$.
Here is a sketch, where $C$ is drawn in red:
Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have though a couple of questions: what is an x-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$. and what about $Msubset mathbb{R}^n and Nsubset mathbb{R}^p$? I think that in that case the regularity is preserved by the restriction to M and N ?
– PerelMan
Dec 25 at 0:08
1
By a $x$-slice, I just mean a vertical line, the name is perhaps not that good! When I say that a map is regular, I really mean that it has no critical value, I am not talking about smoothness. A smooth map restricted to a submanifold is smooth and it is true for all manifolds, not only submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^n$. Is that clearer?
– C. Falcon
Dec 25 at 0:24
Thank you! it is clear to me now.
– PerelMan
Dec 25 at 0:27
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051594%2fcritical-points-of-a-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Let $gcolonmathbb{R}^2tomathbb{R}$ defined by $g(x,y)=x$.
What you have shown is that $g$ has no critical point, however $f=g_{vert C}$ may have critical points!
Keep in mind that:
A regular map $hcolon Mrightarrow N$ restricted to a submanifold $S$ of $M$ may no longer be regular.
Example. The height function on $mathbb{R}^3$ has no critical point, however its restriction to the unit sphere $S^2$ has two critical points, the north pole and the south pole, at those points the tangent plane of $S^2$ has constant altitude.
The general phenomena is that at a point $pin M$, the linear map $T_phcolon T_pSto T_{f(p)}N$ may no longer be surjective, since $T_pS$ does not contain all the directions of $T_pM$.
When $N=mathbb{R}$, we are looking at points $p$, where $T_ph(T_pS)={0}$, since $T_ph$ is a linear form and it is surjective if and only if nonzero.
In your case, you are looking at point $(x,y)in C$ such that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$, this happens at the points $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$ and $(a,0)$.
Since $C$ is defined by the equation $varphi(x,y)=y^2-x(x-1)(x-a)=0$, the tangent line of $C$ at $(x,y)$ is given by $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi^perp$, so that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice if and only if $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi$ has no $y$-component.
Compute $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi=(-3x^2+2(a+1)x-a,2y)$, it has no $y$-component if and only if $y=0$.
Finally, the critical points of $f$ are the $(x,0)in C$, but $(x,0)in C$ if and only if $x=0,1,a$.
Here is a sketch, where $C$ is drawn in red:
Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have though a couple of questions: what is an x-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$. and what about $Msubset mathbb{R}^n and Nsubset mathbb{R}^p$? I think that in that case the regularity is preserved by the restriction to M and N ?
– PerelMan
Dec 25 at 0:08
1
By a $x$-slice, I just mean a vertical line, the name is perhaps not that good! When I say that a map is regular, I really mean that it has no critical value, I am not talking about smoothness. A smooth map restricted to a submanifold is smooth and it is true for all manifolds, not only submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^n$. Is that clearer?
– C. Falcon
Dec 25 at 0:24
Thank you! it is clear to me now.
– PerelMan
Dec 25 at 0:27
add a comment |
Let $gcolonmathbb{R}^2tomathbb{R}$ defined by $g(x,y)=x$.
What you have shown is that $g$ has no critical point, however $f=g_{vert C}$ may have critical points!
Keep in mind that:
A regular map $hcolon Mrightarrow N$ restricted to a submanifold $S$ of $M$ may no longer be regular.
Example. The height function on $mathbb{R}^3$ has no critical point, however its restriction to the unit sphere $S^2$ has two critical points, the north pole and the south pole, at those points the tangent plane of $S^2$ has constant altitude.
The general phenomena is that at a point $pin M$, the linear map $T_phcolon T_pSto T_{f(p)}N$ may no longer be surjective, since $T_pS$ does not contain all the directions of $T_pM$.
When $N=mathbb{R}$, we are looking at points $p$, where $T_ph(T_pS)={0}$, since $T_ph$ is a linear form and it is surjective if and only if nonzero.
In your case, you are looking at point $(x,y)in C$ such that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$, this happens at the points $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$ and $(a,0)$.
Since $C$ is defined by the equation $varphi(x,y)=y^2-x(x-1)(x-a)=0$, the tangent line of $C$ at $(x,y)$ is given by $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi^perp$, so that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice if and only if $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi$ has no $y$-component.
Compute $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi=(-3x^2+2(a+1)x-a,2y)$, it has no $y$-component if and only if $y=0$.
Finally, the critical points of $f$ are the $(x,0)in C$, but $(x,0)in C$ if and only if $x=0,1,a$.
Here is a sketch, where $C$ is drawn in red:
Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have though a couple of questions: what is an x-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$. and what about $Msubset mathbb{R}^n and Nsubset mathbb{R}^p$? I think that in that case the regularity is preserved by the restriction to M and N ?
– PerelMan
Dec 25 at 0:08
1
By a $x$-slice, I just mean a vertical line, the name is perhaps not that good! When I say that a map is regular, I really mean that it has no critical value, I am not talking about smoothness. A smooth map restricted to a submanifold is smooth and it is true for all manifolds, not only submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^n$. Is that clearer?
– C. Falcon
Dec 25 at 0:24
Thank you! it is clear to me now.
– PerelMan
Dec 25 at 0:27
add a comment |
Let $gcolonmathbb{R}^2tomathbb{R}$ defined by $g(x,y)=x$.
What you have shown is that $g$ has no critical point, however $f=g_{vert C}$ may have critical points!
Keep in mind that:
A regular map $hcolon Mrightarrow N$ restricted to a submanifold $S$ of $M$ may no longer be regular.
Example. The height function on $mathbb{R}^3$ has no critical point, however its restriction to the unit sphere $S^2$ has two critical points, the north pole and the south pole, at those points the tangent plane of $S^2$ has constant altitude.
The general phenomena is that at a point $pin M$, the linear map $T_phcolon T_pSto T_{f(p)}N$ may no longer be surjective, since $T_pS$ does not contain all the directions of $T_pM$.
When $N=mathbb{R}$, we are looking at points $p$, where $T_ph(T_pS)={0}$, since $T_ph$ is a linear form and it is surjective if and only if nonzero.
In your case, you are looking at point $(x,y)in C$ such that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$, this happens at the points $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$ and $(a,0)$.
Since $C$ is defined by the equation $varphi(x,y)=y^2-x(x-1)(x-a)=0$, the tangent line of $C$ at $(x,y)$ is given by $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi^perp$, so that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice if and only if $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi$ has no $y$-component.
Compute $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi=(-3x^2+2(a+1)x-a,2y)$, it has no $y$-component if and only if $y=0$.
Finally, the critical points of $f$ are the $(x,0)in C$, but $(x,0)in C$ if and only if $x=0,1,a$.
Here is a sketch, where $C$ is drawn in red:
Let $gcolonmathbb{R}^2tomathbb{R}$ defined by $g(x,y)=x$.
What you have shown is that $g$ has no critical point, however $f=g_{vert C}$ may have critical points!
Keep in mind that:
A regular map $hcolon Mrightarrow N$ restricted to a submanifold $S$ of $M$ may no longer be regular.
Example. The height function on $mathbb{R}^3$ has no critical point, however its restriction to the unit sphere $S^2$ has two critical points, the north pole and the south pole, at those points the tangent plane of $S^2$ has constant altitude.
The general phenomena is that at a point $pin M$, the linear map $T_phcolon T_pSto T_{f(p)}N$ may no longer be surjective, since $T_pS$ does not contain all the directions of $T_pM$.
When $N=mathbb{R}$, we are looking at points $p$, where $T_ph(T_pS)={0}$, since $T_ph$ is a linear form and it is surjective if and only if nonzero.
In your case, you are looking at point $(x,y)in C$ such that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$, this happens at the points $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$ and $(a,0)$.
Since $C$ is defined by the equation $varphi(x,y)=y^2-x(x-1)(x-a)=0$, the tangent line of $C$ at $(x,y)$ is given by $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi^perp$, so that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice if and only if $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi$ has no $y$-component.
Compute $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi=(-3x^2+2(a+1)x-a,2y)$, it has no $y$-component if and only if $y=0$.
Finally, the critical points of $f$ are the $(x,0)in C$, but $(x,0)in C$ if and only if $x=0,1,a$.
Here is a sketch, where $C$ is drawn in red:
edited 2 days ago
answered Dec 24 at 21:39
C. Falcon
14.9k41950
14.9k41950
Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have though a couple of questions: what is an x-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$. and what about $Msubset mathbb{R}^n and Nsubset mathbb{R}^p$? I think that in that case the regularity is preserved by the restriction to M and N ?
– PerelMan
Dec 25 at 0:08
1
By a $x$-slice, I just mean a vertical line, the name is perhaps not that good! When I say that a map is regular, I really mean that it has no critical value, I am not talking about smoothness. A smooth map restricted to a submanifold is smooth and it is true for all manifolds, not only submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^n$. Is that clearer?
– C. Falcon
Dec 25 at 0:24
Thank you! it is clear to me now.
– PerelMan
Dec 25 at 0:27
add a comment |
Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have though a couple of questions: what is an x-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$. and what about $Msubset mathbb{R}^n and Nsubset mathbb{R}^p$? I think that in that case the regularity is preserved by the restriction to M and N ?
– PerelMan
Dec 25 at 0:08
1
By a $x$-slice, I just mean a vertical line, the name is perhaps not that good! When I say that a map is regular, I really mean that it has no critical value, I am not talking about smoothness. A smooth map restricted to a submanifold is smooth and it is true for all manifolds, not only submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^n$. Is that clearer?
– C. Falcon
Dec 25 at 0:24
Thank you! it is clear to me now.
– PerelMan
Dec 25 at 0:27
Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have though a couple of questions: what is an x-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$. and what about $Msubset mathbb{R}^n and Nsubset mathbb{R}^p$? I think that in that case the regularity is preserved by the restriction to M and N ?
– PerelMan
Dec 25 at 0:08
Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have though a couple of questions: what is an x-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$. and what about $Msubset mathbb{R}^n and Nsubset mathbb{R}^p$? I think that in that case the regularity is preserved by the restriction to M and N ?
– PerelMan
Dec 25 at 0:08
1
1
By a $x$-slice, I just mean a vertical line, the name is perhaps not that good! When I say that a map is regular, I really mean that it has no critical value, I am not talking about smoothness. A smooth map restricted to a submanifold is smooth and it is true for all manifolds, not only submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^n$. Is that clearer?
– C. Falcon
Dec 25 at 0:24
By a $x$-slice, I just mean a vertical line, the name is perhaps not that good! When I say that a map is regular, I really mean that it has no critical value, I am not talking about smoothness. A smooth map restricted to a submanifold is smooth and it is true for all manifolds, not only submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^n$. Is that clearer?
– C. Falcon
Dec 25 at 0:24
Thank you! it is clear to me now.
– PerelMan
Dec 25 at 0:27
Thank you! it is clear to me now.
– PerelMan
Dec 25 at 0:27
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051594%2fcritical-points-of-a-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown