critical points of a map












1














Let $mathcal{C}$ be the $mathbb{R}^2$ submanifold defined by:
$y^2 = x(x − 1)(x − a)$ where $a>1$.



Let $f: mathcal{C} rightarrow mathbb{R}^2: (x,y) rightarrow x$



Find the critical point of $f$.



We have $partial_x f=1$ and $partial_y f=0$, which means that f has no critical points because its gradient is non zero.



On the other hand, I know that $f$ has 3 critical points in $(0,0), (1,0), (a,0)$. How to explain this contradiction?



Thank you for your help!










share|cite|improve this question



























    1














    Let $mathcal{C}$ be the $mathbb{R}^2$ submanifold defined by:
    $y^2 = x(x − 1)(x − a)$ where $a>1$.



    Let $f: mathcal{C} rightarrow mathbb{R}^2: (x,y) rightarrow x$



    Find the critical point of $f$.



    We have $partial_x f=1$ and $partial_y f=0$, which means that f has no critical points because its gradient is non zero.



    On the other hand, I know that $f$ has 3 critical points in $(0,0), (1,0), (a,0)$. How to explain this contradiction?



    Thank you for your help!










    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1







      Let $mathcal{C}$ be the $mathbb{R}^2$ submanifold defined by:
      $y^2 = x(x − 1)(x − a)$ where $a>1$.



      Let $f: mathcal{C} rightarrow mathbb{R}^2: (x,y) rightarrow x$



      Find the critical point of $f$.



      We have $partial_x f=1$ and $partial_y f=0$, which means that f has no critical points because its gradient is non zero.



      On the other hand, I know that $f$ has 3 critical points in $(0,0), (1,0), (a,0)$. How to explain this contradiction?



      Thank you for your help!










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $mathcal{C}$ be the $mathbb{R}^2$ submanifold defined by:
      $y^2 = x(x − 1)(x − a)$ where $a>1$.



      Let $f: mathcal{C} rightarrow mathbb{R}^2: (x,y) rightarrow x$



      Find the critical point of $f$.



      We have $partial_x f=1$ and $partial_y f=0$, which means that f has no critical points because its gradient is non zero.



      On the other hand, I know that $f$ has 3 critical points in $(0,0), (1,0), (a,0)$. How to explain this contradiction?



      Thank you for your help!







      differential-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 24 at 20:15









      PerelMan

      509111




      509111






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Let $gcolonmathbb{R}^2tomathbb{R}$ defined by $g(x,y)=x$.



          What you have shown is that $g$ has no critical point, however $f=g_{vert C}$ may have critical points!



          Keep in mind that:




          A regular map $hcolon Mrightarrow N$ restricted to a submanifold $S$ of $M$ may no longer be regular.




          Example. The height function on $mathbb{R}^3$ has no critical point, however its restriction to the unit sphere $S^2$ has two critical points, the north pole and the south pole, at those points the tangent plane of $S^2$ has constant altitude.




          The general phenomena is that at a point $pin M$, the linear map $T_phcolon T_pSto T_{f(p)}N$ may no longer be surjective, since $T_pS$ does not contain all the directions of $T_pM$.




          When $N=mathbb{R}$, we are looking at points $p$, where $T_ph(T_pS)={0}$, since $T_ph$ is a linear form and it is surjective if and only if nonzero.





          In your case, you are looking at point $(x,y)in C$ such that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$, this happens at the points $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$ and $(a,0)$.



          Since $C$ is defined by the equation $varphi(x,y)=y^2-x(x-1)(x-a)=0$, the tangent line of $C$ at $(x,y)$ is given by $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi^perp$, so that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice if and only if $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi$ has no $y$-component.



          Compute $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi=(-3x^2+2(a+1)x-a,2y)$, it has no $y$-component if and only if $y=0$.



          Finally, the critical points of $f$ are the $(x,0)in C$, but $(x,0)in C$ if and only if $x=0,1,a$.



          Here is a sketch, where $C$ is drawn in red:



          enter image description here






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have though a couple of questions: what is an x-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$. and what about $Msubset mathbb{R}^n and Nsubset mathbb{R}^p$? I think that in that case the regularity is preserved by the restriction to M and N ?
            – PerelMan
            Dec 25 at 0:08






          • 1




            By a $x$-slice, I just mean a vertical line, the name is perhaps not that good! When I say that a map is regular, I really mean that it has no critical value, I am not talking about smoothness. A smooth map restricted to a submanifold is smooth and it is true for all manifolds, not only submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^n$. Is that clearer?
            – C. Falcon
            Dec 25 at 0:24












          • Thank you! it is clear to me now.
            – PerelMan
            Dec 25 at 0:27











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051594%2fcritical-points-of-a-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Let $gcolonmathbb{R}^2tomathbb{R}$ defined by $g(x,y)=x$.



          What you have shown is that $g$ has no critical point, however $f=g_{vert C}$ may have critical points!



          Keep in mind that:




          A regular map $hcolon Mrightarrow N$ restricted to a submanifold $S$ of $M$ may no longer be regular.




          Example. The height function on $mathbb{R}^3$ has no critical point, however its restriction to the unit sphere $S^2$ has two critical points, the north pole and the south pole, at those points the tangent plane of $S^2$ has constant altitude.




          The general phenomena is that at a point $pin M$, the linear map $T_phcolon T_pSto T_{f(p)}N$ may no longer be surjective, since $T_pS$ does not contain all the directions of $T_pM$.




          When $N=mathbb{R}$, we are looking at points $p$, where $T_ph(T_pS)={0}$, since $T_ph$ is a linear form and it is surjective if and only if nonzero.





          In your case, you are looking at point $(x,y)in C$ such that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$, this happens at the points $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$ and $(a,0)$.



          Since $C$ is defined by the equation $varphi(x,y)=y^2-x(x-1)(x-a)=0$, the tangent line of $C$ at $(x,y)$ is given by $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi^perp$, so that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice if and only if $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi$ has no $y$-component.



          Compute $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi=(-3x^2+2(a+1)x-a,2y)$, it has no $y$-component if and only if $y=0$.



          Finally, the critical points of $f$ are the $(x,0)in C$, but $(x,0)in C$ if and only if $x=0,1,a$.



          Here is a sketch, where $C$ is drawn in red:



          enter image description here






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have though a couple of questions: what is an x-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$. and what about $Msubset mathbb{R}^n and Nsubset mathbb{R}^p$? I think that in that case the regularity is preserved by the restriction to M and N ?
            – PerelMan
            Dec 25 at 0:08






          • 1




            By a $x$-slice, I just mean a vertical line, the name is perhaps not that good! When I say that a map is regular, I really mean that it has no critical value, I am not talking about smoothness. A smooth map restricted to a submanifold is smooth and it is true for all manifolds, not only submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^n$. Is that clearer?
            – C. Falcon
            Dec 25 at 0:24












          • Thank you! it is clear to me now.
            – PerelMan
            Dec 25 at 0:27
















          1














          Let $gcolonmathbb{R}^2tomathbb{R}$ defined by $g(x,y)=x$.



          What you have shown is that $g$ has no critical point, however $f=g_{vert C}$ may have critical points!



          Keep in mind that:




          A regular map $hcolon Mrightarrow N$ restricted to a submanifold $S$ of $M$ may no longer be regular.




          Example. The height function on $mathbb{R}^3$ has no critical point, however its restriction to the unit sphere $S^2$ has two critical points, the north pole and the south pole, at those points the tangent plane of $S^2$ has constant altitude.




          The general phenomena is that at a point $pin M$, the linear map $T_phcolon T_pSto T_{f(p)}N$ may no longer be surjective, since $T_pS$ does not contain all the directions of $T_pM$.




          When $N=mathbb{R}$, we are looking at points $p$, where $T_ph(T_pS)={0}$, since $T_ph$ is a linear form and it is surjective if and only if nonzero.





          In your case, you are looking at point $(x,y)in C$ such that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$, this happens at the points $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$ and $(a,0)$.



          Since $C$ is defined by the equation $varphi(x,y)=y^2-x(x-1)(x-a)=0$, the tangent line of $C$ at $(x,y)$ is given by $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi^perp$, so that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice if and only if $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi$ has no $y$-component.



          Compute $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi=(-3x^2+2(a+1)x-a,2y)$, it has no $y$-component if and only if $y=0$.



          Finally, the critical points of $f$ are the $(x,0)in C$, but $(x,0)in C$ if and only if $x=0,1,a$.



          Here is a sketch, where $C$ is drawn in red:



          enter image description here






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have though a couple of questions: what is an x-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$. and what about $Msubset mathbb{R}^n and Nsubset mathbb{R}^p$? I think that in that case the regularity is preserved by the restriction to M and N ?
            – PerelMan
            Dec 25 at 0:08






          • 1




            By a $x$-slice, I just mean a vertical line, the name is perhaps not that good! When I say that a map is regular, I really mean that it has no critical value, I am not talking about smoothness. A smooth map restricted to a submanifold is smooth and it is true for all manifolds, not only submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^n$. Is that clearer?
            – C. Falcon
            Dec 25 at 0:24












          • Thank you! it is clear to me now.
            – PerelMan
            Dec 25 at 0:27














          1












          1








          1






          Let $gcolonmathbb{R}^2tomathbb{R}$ defined by $g(x,y)=x$.



          What you have shown is that $g$ has no critical point, however $f=g_{vert C}$ may have critical points!



          Keep in mind that:




          A regular map $hcolon Mrightarrow N$ restricted to a submanifold $S$ of $M$ may no longer be regular.




          Example. The height function on $mathbb{R}^3$ has no critical point, however its restriction to the unit sphere $S^2$ has two critical points, the north pole and the south pole, at those points the tangent plane of $S^2$ has constant altitude.




          The general phenomena is that at a point $pin M$, the linear map $T_phcolon T_pSto T_{f(p)}N$ may no longer be surjective, since $T_pS$ does not contain all the directions of $T_pM$.




          When $N=mathbb{R}$, we are looking at points $p$, where $T_ph(T_pS)={0}$, since $T_ph$ is a linear form and it is surjective if and only if nonzero.





          In your case, you are looking at point $(x,y)in C$ such that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$, this happens at the points $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$ and $(a,0)$.



          Since $C$ is defined by the equation $varphi(x,y)=y^2-x(x-1)(x-a)=0$, the tangent line of $C$ at $(x,y)$ is given by $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi^perp$, so that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice if and only if $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi$ has no $y$-component.



          Compute $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi=(-3x^2+2(a+1)x-a,2y)$, it has no $y$-component if and only if $y=0$.



          Finally, the critical points of $f$ are the $(x,0)in C$, but $(x,0)in C$ if and only if $x=0,1,a$.



          Here is a sketch, where $C$ is drawn in red:



          enter image description here






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Let $gcolonmathbb{R}^2tomathbb{R}$ defined by $g(x,y)=x$.



          What you have shown is that $g$ has no critical point, however $f=g_{vert C}$ may have critical points!



          Keep in mind that:




          A regular map $hcolon Mrightarrow N$ restricted to a submanifold $S$ of $M$ may no longer be regular.




          Example. The height function on $mathbb{R}^3$ has no critical point, however its restriction to the unit sphere $S^2$ has two critical points, the north pole and the south pole, at those points the tangent plane of $S^2$ has constant altitude.




          The general phenomena is that at a point $pin M$, the linear map $T_phcolon T_pSto T_{f(p)}N$ may no longer be surjective, since $T_pS$ does not contain all the directions of $T_pM$.




          When $N=mathbb{R}$, we are looking at points $p$, where $T_ph(T_pS)={0}$, since $T_ph$ is a linear form and it is surjective if and only if nonzero.





          In your case, you are looking at point $(x,y)in C$ such that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$, this happens at the points $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$ and $(a,0)$.



          Since $C$ is defined by the equation $varphi(x,y)=y^2-x(x-1)(x-a)=0$, the tangent line of $C$ at $(x,y)$ is given by $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi^perp$, so that $T_{(x,y)}C$ is contained in a $x$-slice if and only if $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi$ has no $y$-component.



          Compute $nabla_{(x,y)}varphi=(-3x^2+2(a+1)x-a,2y)$, it has no $y$-component if and only if $y=0$.



          Finally, the critical points of $f$ are the $(x,0)in C$, but $(x,0)in C$ if and only if $x=0,1,a$.



          Here is a sketch, where $C$ is drawn in red:



          enter image description here







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago

























          answered Dec 24 at 21:39









          C. Falcon

          14.9k41950




          14.9k41950












          • Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have though a couple of questions: what is an x-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$. and what about $Msubset mathbb{R}^n and Nsubset mathbb{R}^p$? I think that in that case the regularity is preserved by the restriction to M and N ?
            – PerelMan
            Dec 25 at 0:08






          • 1




            By a $x$-slice, I just mean a vertical line, the name is perhaps not that good! When I say that a map is regular, I really mean that it has no critical value, I am not talking about smoothness. A smooth map restricted to a submanifold is smooth and it is true for all manifolds, not only submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^n$. Is that clearer?
            – C. Falcon
            Dec 25 at 0:24












          • Thank you! it is clear to me now.
            – PerelMan
            Dec 25 at 0:27


















          • Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have though a couple of questions: what is an x-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$. and what about $Msubset mathbb{R}^n and Nsubset mathbb{R}^p$? I think that in that case the regularity is preserved by the restriction to M and N ?
            – PerelMan
            Dec 25 at 0:08






          • 1




            By a $x$-slice, I just mean a vertical line, the name is perhaps not that good! When I say that a map is regular, I really mean that it has no critical value, I am not talking about smoothness. A smooth map restricted to a submanifold is smooth and it is true for all manifolds, not only submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^n$. Is that clearer?
            – C. Falcon
            Dec 25 at 0:24












          • Thank you! it is clear to me now.
            – PerelMan
            Dec 25 at 0:27
















          Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have though a couple of questions: what is an x-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$. and what about $Msubset mathbb{R}^n and Nsubset mathbb{R}^p$? I think that in that case the regularity is preserved by the restriction to M and N ?
          – PerelMan
          Dec 25 at 0:08




          Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have though a couple of questions: what is an x-slice of $mathbb{R}^2$. and what about $Msubset mathbb{R}^n and Nsubset mathbb{R}^p$? I think that in that case the regularity is preserved by the restriction to M and N ?
          – PerelMan
          Dec 25 at 0:08




          1




          1




          By a $x$-slice, I just mean a vertical line, the name is perhaps not that good! When I say that a map is regular, I really mean that it has no critical value, I am not talking about smoothness. A smooth map restricted to a submanifold is smooth and it is true for all manifolds, not only submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^n$. Is that clearer?
          – C. Falcon
          Dec 25 at 0:24






          By a $x$-slice, I just mean a vertical line, the name is perhaps not that good! When I say that a map is regular, I really mean that it has no critical value, I am not talking about smoothness. A smooth map restricted to a submanifold is smooth and it is true for all manifolds, not only submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^n$. Is that clearer?
          – C. Falcon
          Dec 25 at 0:24














          Thank you! it is clear to me now.
          – PerelMan
          Dec 25 at 0:27




          Thank you! it is clear to me now.
          – PerelMan
          Dec 25 at 0:27


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051594%2fcritical-points-of-a-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Human spaceflight

          Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

          張江高科駅