If a magic weapon requires attunement, and a warlock makes it their pact weapon, does it still take up an...





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







15












$begingroup$


Player characters normally have an attunement limit of 3 items.



As a warlock, if I have a weapon that normally requires attunement, will it still take up one of my attunement slots after I make it my Pact Weapon?






dnd-5e magic-items class-feature weapons warlock







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Is there a reason you think a weapon that requires attunement would lose that requirement if it becomes your pact weapon?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 14 at 8:39


















15












$begingroup$


Player characters normally have an attunement limit of 3 items.



As a warlock, if I have a weapon that normally requires attunement, will it still take up one of my attunement slots after I make it my Pact Weapon?






dnd-5e magic-items class-feature weapons warlock







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Is there a reason you think a weapon that requires attunement would lose that requirement if it becomes your pact weapon?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 14 at 8:39














15












15








15





$begingroup$


Player characters normally have an attunement limit of 3 items.



As a warlock, if I have a weapon that normally requires attunement, will it still take up one of my attunement slots after I make it my Pact Weapon?






dnd-5e magic-items class-feature weapons warlock







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Player characters normally have an attunement limit of 3 items.



As a warlock, if I have a weapon that normally requires attunement, will it still take up one of my attunement slots after I make it my Pact Weapon?






dnd-5e magic-items class-feature weapons warlock




dnd-5e magic-items class-feature weapons warlock






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 14 at 8:38









V2Blast

27.5k597167




27.5k597167










asked Feb 14 at 8:26









Confused HippoConfused Hippo

814




814








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Is there a reason you think a weapon that requires attunement would lose that requirement if it becomes your pact weapon?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 14 at 8:39














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Is there a reason you think a weapon that requires attunement would lose that requirement if it becomes your pact weapon?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 14 at 8:39








1




1




$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Is there a reason you think a weapon that requires attunement would lose that requirement if it becomes your pact weapon?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Feb 14 at 8:39




$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Is there a reason you think a weapon that requires attunement would lose that requirement if it becomes your pact weapon?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Feb 14 at 8:39










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















23












$begingroup$

Yes, it still takes up an attunement slot.



There are no rules in the Pact of the Blade Warlock section to suggest otherwise.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If it would free up the attunement slot, it would say so.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindwin
    Feb 14 at 11:19






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    It takes up an attunement slot if the warlock remains attuned to it, right? There's no requirement that they attune to the weapon to use it as their pact weapon, although obviously they won't be able to use any of the weapon's features that require attunement in that case.
    $endgroup$
    – Marq
    Feb 14 at 13:34










  • $begingroup$
    @Marq I think it's very likely, but just to be certain I've asked that as a separate question.
    $endgroup$
    – Kamil Drakari
    Feb 14 at 14:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    +1 for the length
    $endgroup$
    – András
    Feb 15 at 11:29



















15












$begingroup$

Attunement is unaffected by making a weapon your pact weapon



If a weapon normally requires attunement in order to gain full use of its features this will not change when it is made a pact weapon.



The rules around transforming another weapon into your pact weapon are as follows:




Pact of the Blade



You can transform one magic weapon into your pact weapon by performing a special ritual while you hold the weapon. You perform the ritual over the course of 1 hour, which can be done during a short rest. You can then dismiss the weapon, shunting it into an extradimensional space, and it appears whenever you create your pact weapon thereafter. You can’t affect an artifact or a sentient weapon in this way. The weapon ceases being your pact weapon if you die, if you perform the 1-hour ritual on a different weapon, or if you use a 1-hour ritual to break your bond to it. The weapon appears at your feet if it is in the extradimensional space when the bond breaks.




No mention is made of attunement changing in any way, when a weapon becomes a pact weapon, therefore it doesn't.



The eldritch invocation Improved Pact Weapon from XGTE, doesn't affect attunement either.



It is, however, always possible to wield a weapon that requires attunement without attuning to it, you just won't benefit from any of its features that require attunement. A sword you haven't attuned to in order to deal extra fire damage is still a sword you can wield like any other sword.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    How long has this spell been around? Because that description sounds very similar to a Shardblade bond from Brandon Sanderson's The Stormlight Archive books.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason Wheeler
    Feb 14 at 13:55










  • $begingroup$
    Mason, I think Warlocks were introduced in 3.5e as a variant class and 4e as an official class. Pact of the Blade (which is a class feature, not a spell) as named is new to 5e, although pact weapons have been part of the class since 4e.
    $endgroup$
    – Raj
    Feb 14 at 14:20



















0












$begingroup$

To provide a thought to clarify how this works: Your attunement is for the powers of the magic item itself. Making something your pact weapon applies the effects of a pact weapon to a weapon. Neither of these elements interacts with the other, so both function as written without modification.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Your answer should stand alone as an answer to the question, so you might want to add a header or clarifying sentence to make it clear what your answer is (e.g. "Yes, it does still require an attunement slot.").
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 14 at 21:00














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141106%2fif-a-magic-weapon-requires-attunement-and-a-warlock-makes-it-their-pact-weapon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









23












$begingroup$

Yes, it still takes up an attunement slot.



There are no rules in the Pact of the Blade Warlock section to suggest otherwise.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If it would free up the attunement slot, it would say so.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindwin
    Feb 14 at 11:19






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    It takes up an attunement slot if the warlock remains attuned to it, right? There's no requirement that they attune to the weapon to use it as their pact weapon, although obviously they won't be able to use any of the weapon's features that require attunement in that case.
    $endgroup$
    – Marq
    Feb 14 at 13:34










  • $begingroup$
    @Marq I think it's very likely, but just to be certain I've asked that as a separate question.
    $endgroup$
    – Kamil Drakari
    Feb 14 at 14:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    +1 for the length
    $endgroup$
    – András
    Feb 15 at 11:29
















23












$begingroup$

Yes, it still takes up an attunement slot.



There are no rules in the Pact of the Blade Warlock section to suggest otherwise.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If it would free up the attunement slot, it would say so.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindwin
    Feb 14 at 11:19






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    It takes up an attunement slot if the warlock remains attuned to it, right? There's no requirement that they attune to the weapon to use it as their pact weapon, although obviously they won't be able to use any of the weapon's features that require attunement in that case.
    $endgroup$
    – Marq
    Feb 14 at 13:34










  • $begingroup$
    @Marq I think it's very likely, but just to be certain I've asked that as a separate question.
    $endgroup$
    – Kamil Drakari
    Feb 14 at 14:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    +1 for the length
    $endgroup$
    – András
    Feb 15 at 11:29














23












23








23





$begingroup$

Yes, it still takes up an attunement slot.



There are no rules in the Pact of the Blade Warlock section to suggest otherwise.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Yes, it still takes up an attunement slot.



There are no rules in the Pact of the Blade Warlock section to suggest otherwise.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Feb 14 at 8:53









BradenA8BradenA8

1,8171929




1,8171929








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If it would free up the attunement slot, it would say so.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindwin
    Feb 14 at 11:19






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    It takes up an attunement slot if the warlock remains attuned to it, right? There's no requirement that they attune to the weapon to use it as their pact weapon, although obviously they won't be able to use any of the weapon's features that require attunement in that case.
    $endgroup$
    – Marq
    Feb 14 at 13:34










  • $begingroup$
    @Marq I think it's very likely, but just to be certain I've asked that as a separate question.
    $endgroup$
    – Kamil Drakari
    Feb 14 at 14:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    +1 for the length
    $endgroup$
    – András
    Feb 15 at 11:29














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If it would free up the attunement slot, it would say so.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindwin
    Feb 14 at 11:19






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    It takes up an attunement slot if the warlock remains attuned to it, right? There's no requirement that they attune to the weapon to use it as their pact weapon, although obviously they won't be able to use any of the weapon's features that require attunement in that case.
    $endgroup$
    – Marq
    Feb 14 at 13:34










  • $begingroup$
    @Marq I think it's very likely, but just to be certain I've asked that as a separate question.
    $endgroup$
    – Kamil Drakari
    Feb 14 at 14:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    +1 for the length
    $endgroup$
    – András
    Feb 15 at 11:29








2




2




$begingroup$
If it would free up the attunement slot, it would say so.
$endgroup$
– Mindwin
Feb 14 at 11:19




$begingroup$
If it would free up the attunement slot, it would say so.
$endgroup$
– Mindwin
Feb 14 at 11:19




7




7




$begingroup$
It takes up an attunement slot if the warlock remains attuned to it, right? There's no requirement that they attune to the weapon to use it as their pact weapon, although obviously they won't be able to use any of the weapon's features that require attunement in that case.
$endgroup$
– Marq
Feb 14 at 13:34




$begingroup$
It takes up an attunement slot if the warlock remains attuned to it, right? There's no requirement that they attune to the weapon to use it as their pact weapon, although obviously they won't be able to use any of the weapon's features that require attunement in that case.
$endgroup$
– Marq
Feb 14 at 13:34












$begingroup$
@Marq I think it's very likely, but just to be certain I've asked that as a separate question.
$endgroup$
– Kamil Drakari
Feb 14 at 14:34




$begingroup$
@Marq I think it's very likely, but just to be certain I've asked that as a separate question.
$endgroup$
– Kamil Drakari
Feb 14 at 14:34




1




1




$begingroup$
+1 for the length
$endgroup$
– András
Feb 15 at 11:29




$begingroup$
+1 for the length
$endgroup$
– András
Feb 15 at 11:29













15












$begingroup$

Attunement is unaffected by making a weapon your pact weapon



If a weapon normally requires attunement in order to gain full use of its features this will not change when it is made a pact weapon.



The rules around transforming another weapon into your pact weapon are as follows:




Pact of the Blade



You can transform one magic weapon into your pact weapon by performing a special ritual while you hold the weapon. You perform the ritual over the course of 1 hour, which can be done during a short rest. You can then dismiss the weapon, shunting it into an extradimensional space, and it appears whenever you create your pact weapon thereafter. You can’t affect an artifact or a sentient weapon in this way. The weapon ceases being your pact weapon if you die, if you perform the 1-hour ritual on a different weapon, or if you use a 1-hour ritual to break your bond to it. The weapon appears at your feet if it is in the extradimensional space when the bond breaks.




No mention is made of attunement changing in any way, when a weapon becomes a pact weapon, therefore it doesn't.



The eldritch invocation Improved Pact Weapon from XGTE, doesn't affect attunement either.



It is, however, always possible to wield a weapon that requires attunement without attuning to it, you just won't benefit from any of its features that require attunement. A sword you haven't attuned to in order to deal extra fire damage is still a sword you can wield like any other sword.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    How long has this spell been around? Because that description sounds very similar to a Shardblade bond from Brandon Sanderson's The Stormlight Archive books.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason Wheeler
    Feb 14 at 13:55










  • $begingroup$
    Mason, I think Warlocks were introduced in 3.5e as a variant class and 4e as an official class. Pact of the Blade (which is a class feature, not a spell) as named is new to 5e, although pact weapons have been part of the class since 4e.
    $endgroup$
    – Raj
    Feb 14 at 14:20
















15












$begingroup$

Attunement is unaffected by making a weapon your pact weapon



If a weapon normally requires attunement in order to gain full use of its features this will not change when it is made a pact weapon.



The rules around transforming another weapon into your pact weapon are as follows:




Pact of the Blade



You can transform one magic weapon into your pact weapon by performing a special ritual while you hold the weapon. You perform the ritual over the course of 1 hour, which can be done during a short rest. You can then dismiss the weapon, shunting it into an extradimensional space, and it appears whenever you create your pact weapon thereafter. You can’t affect an artifact or a sentient weapon in this way. The weapon ceases being your pact weapon if you die, if you perform the 1-hour ritual on a different weapon, or if you use a 1-hour ritual to break your bond to it. The weapon appears at your feet if it is in the extradimensional space when the bond breaks.




No mention is made of attunement changing in any way, when a weapon becomes a pact weapon, therefore it doesn't.



The eldritch invocation Improved Pact Weapon from XGTE, doesn't affect attunement either.



It is, however, always possible to wield a weapon that requires attunement without attuning to it, you just won't benefit from any of its features that require attunement. A sword you haven't attuned to in order to deal extra fire damage is still a sword you can wield like any other sword.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    How long has this spell been around? Because that description sounds very similar to a Shardblade bond from Brandon Sanderson's The Stormlight Archive books.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason Wheeler
    Feb 14 at 13:55










  • $begingroup$
    Mason, I think Warlocks were introduced in 3.5e as a variant class and 4e as an official class. Pact of the Blade (which is a class feature, not a spell) as named is new to 5e, although pact weapons have been part of the class since 4e.
    $endgroup$
    – Raj
    Feb 14 at 14:20














15












15








15





$begingroup$

Attunement is unaffected by making a weapon your pact weapon



If a weapon normally requires attunement in order to gain full use of its features this will not change when it is made a pact weapon.



The rules around transforming another weapon into your pact weapon are as follows:




Pact of the Blade



You can transform one magic weapon into your pact weapon by performing a special ritual while you hold the weapon. You perform the ritual over the course of 1 hour, which can be done during a short rest. You can then dismiss the weapon, shunting it into an extradimensional space, and it appears whenever you create your pact weapon thereafter. You can’t affect an artifact or a sentient weapon in this way. The weapon ceases being your pact weapon if you die, if you perform the 1-hour ritual on a different weapon, or if you use a 1-hour ritual to break your bond to it. The weapon appears at your feet if it is in the extradimensional space when the bond breaks.




No mention is made of attunement changing in any way, when a weapon becomes a pact weapon, therefore it doesn't.



The eldritch invocation Improved Pact Weapon from XGTE, doesn't affect attunement either.



It is, however, always possible to wield a weapon that requires attunement without attuning to it, you just won't benefit from any of its features that require attunement. A sword you haven't attuned to in order to deal extra fire damage is still a sword you can wield like any other sword.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Attunement is unaffected by making a weapon your pact weapon



If a weapon normally requires attunement in order to gain full use of its features this will not change when it is made a pact weapon.



The rules around transforming another weapon into your pact weapon are as follows:




Pact of the Blade



You can transform one magic weapon into your pact weapon by performing a special ritual while you hold the weapon. You perform the ritual over the course of 1 hour, which can be done during a short rest. You can then dismiss the weapon, shunting it into an extradimensional space, and it appears whenever you create your pact weapon thereafter. You can’t affect an artifact or a sentient weapon in this way. The weapon ceases being your pact weapon if you die, if you perform the 1-hour ritual on a different weapon, or if you use a 1-hour ritual to break your bond to it. The weapon appears at your feet if it is in the extradimensional space when the bond breaks.




No mention is made of attunement changing in any way, when a weapon becomes a pact weapon, therefore it doesn't.



The eldritch invocation Improved Pact Weapon from XGTE, doesn't affect attunement either.



It is, however, always possible to wield a weapon that requires attunement without attuning to it, you just won't benefit from any of its features that require attunement. A sword you haven't attuned to in order to deal extra fire damage is still a sword you can wield like any other sword.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Feb 14 at 14:41

























answered Feb 14 at 9:02









TiggerousTiggerous

10.9k44987




10.9k44987












  • $begingroup$
    How long has this spell been around? Because that description sounds very similar to a Shardblade bond from Brandon Sanderson's The Stormlight Archive books.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason Wheeler
    Feb 14 at 13:55










  • $begingroup$
    Mason, I think Warlocks were introduced in 3.5e as a variant class and 4e as an official class. Pact of the Blade (which is a class feature, not a spell) as named is new to 5e, although pact weapons have been part of the class since 4e.
    $endgroup$
    – Raj
    Feb 14 at 14:20


















  • $begingroup$
    How long has this spell been around? Because that description sounds very similar to a Shardblade bond from Brandon Sanderson's The Stormlight Archive books.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason Wheeler
    Feb 14 at 13:55










  • $begingroup$
    Mason, I think Warlocks were introduced in 3.5e as a variant class and 4e as an official class. Pact of the Blade (which is a class feature, not a spell) as named is new to 5e, although pact weapons have been part of the class since 4e.
    $endgroup$
    – Raj
    Feb 14 at 14:20
















$begingroup$
How long has this spell been around? Because that description sounds very similar to a Shardblade bond from Brandon Sanderson's The Stormlight Archive books.
$endgroup$
– Mason Wheeler
Feb 14 at 13:55




$begingroup$
How long has this spell been around? Because that description sounds very similar to a Shardblade bond from Brandon Sanderson's The Stormlight Archive books.
$endgroup$
– Mason Wheeler
Feb 14 at 13:55












$begingroup$
Mason, I think Warlocks were introduced in 3.5e as a variant class and 4e as an official class. Pact of the Blade (which is a class feature, not a spell) as named is new to 5e, although pact weapons have been part of the class since 4e.
$endgroup$
– Raj
Feb 14 at 14:20




$begingroup$
Mason, I think Warlocks were introduced in 3.5e as a variant class and 4e as an official class. Pact of the Blade (which is a class feature, not a spell) as named is new to 5e, although pact weapons have been part of the class since 4e.
$endgroup$
– Raj
Feb 14 at 14:20











0












$begingroup$

To provide a thought to clarify how this works: Your attunement is for the powers of the magic item itself. Making something your pact weapon applies the effects of a pact weapon to a weapon. Neither of these elements interacts with the other, so both function as written without modification.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Your answer should stand alone as an answer to the question, so you might want to add a header or clarifying sentence to make it clear what your answer is (e.g. "Yes, it does still require an attunement slot.").
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 14 at 21:00


















0












$begingroup$

To provide a thought to clarify how this works: Your attunement is for the powers of the magic item itself. Making something your pact weapon applies the effects of a pact weapon to a weapon. Neither of these elements interacts with the other, so both function as written without modification.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Your answer should stand alone as an answer to the question, so you might want to add a header or clarifying sentence to make it clear what your answer is (e.g. "Yes, it does still require an attunement slot.").
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 14 at 21:00
















0












0








0





$begingroup$

To provide a thought to clarify how this works: Your attunement is for the powers of the magic item itself. Making something your pact weapon applies the effects of a pact weapon to a weapon. Neither of these elements interacts with the other, so both function as written without modification.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



To provide a thought to clarify how this works: Your attunement is for the powers of the magic item itself. Making something your pact weapon applies the effects of a pact weapon to a weapon. Neither of these elements interacts with the other, so both function as written without modification.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Feb 14 at 17:20









MarkTOMarkTO

4,4351343




4,4351343












  • $begingroup$
    Your answer should stand alone as an answer to the question, so you might want to add a header or clarifying sentence to make it clear what your answer is (e.g. "Yes, it does still require an attunement slot.").
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 14 at 21:00




















  • $begingroup$
    Your answer should stand alone as an answer to the question, so you might want to add a header or clarifying sentence to make it clear what your answer is (e.g. "Yes, it does still require an attunement slot.").
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Feb 14 at 21:00


















$begingroup$
Your answer should stand alone as an answer to the question, so you might want to add a header or clarifying sentence to make it clear what your answer is (e.g. "Yes, it does still require an attunement slot.").
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Feb 14 at 21:00






$begingroup$
Your answer should stand alone as an answer to the question, so you might want to add a header or clarifying sentence to make it clear what your answer is (e.g. "Yes, it does still require an attunement slot.").
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Feb 14 at 21:00




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141106%2fif-a-magic-weapon-requires-attunement-and-a-warlock-makes-it-their-pact-weapon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Image
Human spaceflight From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search "Space traveler" redirects here. For other uses, see Space traveler (disambiguation). @media all and (max-width:720px){.mw-parser-output .tmulti>.thumbinner{width:100%!important;max-width:none!important}.mw-parser-output .tmulti .tsingle{float:none!important;max-width:none!important;width:100%!important;text-align:center}} Apollo 11 crewmember Buzz Aldrin on the Moon, 1969 International Space Station crewmember Tracy Caldwell Dyson views the Earth, 2010 Space Shuttle Discovery heads into space with a crew aboard, STS-121 in 2006 Inside a space suit on the Canadarm, 1993 Human spaceflight (also referred to as crewed spaceflight or manned spaceflight ) is space travel with a crew or passengers aboard the spacecraft. Spacecraft carrying people may be operated directly, by human crew, or it may be e
Read more

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

Image
0 1 What exactly does the error message beginning with E: mean? I assume it has to do with the file structure on Ubuntu-on-Windows, but what exactly? The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required: os-prober Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove it. The following extra packages will be installed: libxslt1.1 The following NEW packages will be installed: libxslt1.1 xmlstarlet 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 435 kB of archives. After this operation, 1023 kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main libxslt1.1 amd64 1.1.28-2build1 [145 kB] Get:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/universe xmlstarlet amd64 1.5.0-1 [290 kB]
Read more

File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg

Image
File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search File File history File usage No higher resolution available. DeusFollowingSea.jpg ‎ (238 × 211 pixels, file size: 12 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg ) Summary [ edit ] Media data and Non-free use rationale Description Cover art of the Deus CD Following Sea Author or copyright owner Deus Source (WP:NFCC#4) rocksucker.co.uk Date of publication 2012 Use in article (WP:NFCC#7) Following Sea Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8) to serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question. Not replaceable with free media because (WP:NFCC#1) n.a. Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3) Low res image used in infobox of the article on the album Respect for commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2) n.a. Fair use Fair use of co
Read more