Clarification about this step in matrix proof?












0












$begingroup$


Suppose $A$ is a matrix of rank $r$ of order $n times m$ and suppose it can be partitioned into pieces $A_{11},A_{12},A_{21},A_{22}$, where the leading minor $A_{11}$ is of size $r times r$ and is non-singular.



In a proof, my textbook uses the following property:




If $A_{11}^-$ is the inverse of $A_{11}$, then by the construction there is a matrix $B$ such that $[A_{21}, A_{22}] = B [ A_{11}, A_{12}]$




It doesn't elaborate/explain, and I'm unsure how exactly this is justified.



Intuitively, I suppose it is because $A$ is of rank $r$, and the sub-matrix $A_{11}$ is also of rank $r$. Could someone explain this step to me?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If it was not the case, either $A_{11}$ would not be full rank or the rank of $A$ would be strictly more than $r$.
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 14 at 9:43


















0












$begingroup$


Suppose $A$ is a matrix of rank $r$ of order $n times m$ and suppose it can be partitioned into pieces $A_{11},A_{12},A_{21},A_{22}$, where the leading minor $A_{11}$ is of size $r times r$ and is non-singular.



In a proof, my textbook uses the following property:




If $A_{11}^-$ is the inverse of $A_{11}$, then by the construction there is a matrix $B$ such that $[A_{21}, A_{22}] = B [ A_{11}, A_{12}]$




It doesn't elaborate/explain, and I'm unsure how exactly this is justified.



Intuitively, I suppose it is because $A$ is of rank $r$, and the sub-matrix $A_{11}$ is also of rank $r$. Could someone explain this step to me?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If it was not the case, either $A_{11}$ would not be full rank or the rank of $A$ would be strictly more than $r$.
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 14 at 9:43
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


Suppose $A$ is a matrix of rank $r$ of order $n times m$ and suppose it can be partitioned into pieces $A_{11},A_{12},A_{21},A_{22}$, where the leading minor $A_{11}$ is of size $r times r$ and is non-singular.



In a proof, my textbook uses the following property:




If $A_{11}^-$ is the inverse of $A_{11}$, then by the construction there is a matrix $B$ such that $[A_{21}, A_{22}] = B [ A_{11}, A_{12}]$




It doesn't elaborate/explain, and I'm unsure how exactly this is justified.



Intuitively, I suppose it is because $A$ is of rank $r$, and the sub-matrix $A_{11}$ is also of rank $r$. Could someone explain this step to me?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Suppose $A$ is a matrix of rank $r$ of order $n times m$ and suppose it can be partitioned into pieces $A_{11},A_{12},A_{21},A_{22}$, where the leading minor $A_{11}$ is of size $r times r$ and is non-singular.



In a proof, my textbook uses the following property:




If $A_{11}^-$ is the inverse of $A_{11}$, then by the construction there is a matrix $B$ such that $[A_{21}, A_{22}] = B [ A_{11}, A_{12}]$




It doesn't elaborate/explain, and I'm unsure how exactly this is justified.



Intuitively, I suppose it is because $A$ is of rank $r$, and the sub-matrix $A_{11}$ is also of rank $r$. Could someone explain this step to me?







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 14 at 9:20









XiaomiXiaomi

1,071115




1,071115












  • $begingroup$
    If it was not the case, either $A_{11}$ would not be full rank or the rank of $A$ would be strictly more than $r$.
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 14 at 9:43




















  • $begingroup$
    If it was not the case, either $A_{11}$ would not be full rank or the rank of $A$ would be strictly more than $r$.
    $endgroup$
    – P. Quinton
    Jan 14 at 9:43


















$begingroup$
If it was not the case, either $A_{11}$ would not be full rank or the rank of $A$ would be strictly more than $r$.
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 14 at 9:43






$begingroup$
If it was not the case, either $A_{11}$ would not be full rank or the rank of $A$ would be strictly more than $r$.
$endgroup$
– P. Quinton
Jan 14 at 9:43












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The matrix $A$ is split into two rows $[A_{11}, A_{12}]$ (top) and $[A_{21}, A_{22}]$ (bottom). Since the total rank is $r$ and the top row already has rank $r$, each of the bottom rows is a linear combination of some of the first $r$ rows. Denoting $A_j$ for the $j$th row of $A$, this means for each $i > r$ there are coefficients $b_{ij}$ such that



$$A_i = sum_{1leq j leq r}b_{ij}A_j$$



These coefficients populate a $(n-r)times r$ matrix $B = (b_{ij})$, with $BA_{11} = A_{21}$ and $BA_{12} = A_{22}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thanks a lot, that makes a lot of sense
    $endgroup$
    – Xiaomi
    Jan 14 at 10:34











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073015%2fclarification-about-this-step-in-matrix-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

The matrix $A$ is split into two rows $[A_{11}, A_{12}]$ (top) and $[A_{21}, A_{22}]$ (bottom). Since the total rank is $r$ and the top row already has rank $r$, each of the bottom rows is a linear combination of some of the first $r$ rows. Denoting $A_j$ for the $j$th row of $A$, this means for each $i > r$ there are coefficients $b_{ij}$ such that



$$A_i = sum_{1leq j leq r}b_{ij}A_j$$



These coefficients populate a $(n-r)times r$ matrix $B = (b_{ij})$, with $BA_{11} = A_{21}$ and $BA_{12} = A_{22}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thanks a lot, that makes a lot of sense
    $endgroup$
    – Xiaomi
    Jan 14 at 10:34
















1












$begingroup$

The matrix $A$ is split into two rows $[A_{11}, A_{12}]$ (top) and $[A_{21}, A_{22}]$ (bottom). Since the total rank is $r$ and the top row already has rank $r$, each of the bottom rows is a linear combination of some of the first $r$ rows. Denoting $A_j$ for the $j$th row of $A$, this means for each $i > r$ there are coefficients $b_{ij}$ such that



$$A_i = sum_{1leq j leq r}b_{ij}A_j$$



These coefficients populate a $(n-r)times r$ matrix $B = (b_{ij})$, with $BA_{11} = A_{21}$ and $BA_{12} = A_{22}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thanks a lot, that makes a lot of sense
    $endgroup$
    – Xiaomi
    Jan 14 at 10:34














1












1








1





$begingroup$

The matrix $A$ is split into two rows $[A_{11}, A_{12}]$ (top) and $[A_{21}, A_{22}]$ (bottom). Since the total rank is $r$ and the top row already has rank $r$, each of the bottom rows is a linear combination of some of the first $r$ rows. Denoting $A_j$ for the $j$th row of $A$, this means for each $i > r$ there are coefficients $b_{ij}$ such that



$$A_i = sum_{1leq j leq r}b_{ij}A_j$$



These coefficients populate a $(n-r)times r$ matrix $B = (b_{ij})$, with $BA_{11} = A_{21}$ and $BA_{12} = A_{22}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The matrix $A$ is split into two rows $[A_{11}, A_{12}]$ (top) and $[A_{21}, A_{22}]$ (bottom). Since the total rank is $r$ and the top row already has rank $r$, each of the bottom rows is a linear combination of some of the first $r$ rows. Denoting $A_j$ for the $j$th row of $A$, this means for each $i > r$ there are coefficients $b_{ij}$ such that



$$A_i = sum_{1leq j leq r}b_{ij}A_j$$



These coefficients populate a $(n-r)times r$ matrix $B = (b_{ij})$, with $BA_{11} = A_{21}$ and $BA_{12} = A_{22}$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 14 at 9:51









BenBen

4,283617




4,283617












  • $begingroup$
    thanks a lot, that makes a lot of sense
    $endgroup$
    – Xiaomi
    Jan 14 at 10:34


















  • $begingroup$
    thanks a lot, that makes a lot of sense
    $endgroup$
    – Xiaomi
    Jan 14 at 10:34
















$begingroup$
thanks a lot, that makes a lot of sense
$endgroup$
– Xiaomi
Jan 14 at 10:34




$begingroup$
thanks a lot, that makes a lot of sense
$endgroup$
– Xiaomi
Jan 14 at 10:34


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073015%2fclarification-about-this-step-in-matrix-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg