How to treat an equation of the form $-Delta u=Gcdot nabla u+f(u) ?$
There are plenty of variational techniques (direct methods of calculus of variations, mountain pass type theorems, Lusternik-Schnirelmann theory) to prove the existence of solutions of a semilinear elliptic equation of the form $$-Delta u=f(u)$$
in the Sobolev space $H^1_0(Omega)$, where $Omega$ is a non-empty open subset of $mathbb{R}^n$,
under suitable hypothesis on $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$, thanks to the fact that we can see weak solutions of this problem as the stationary points of the functional:
$$I:H^1_0(Omega)tomathbb{R}, umapstofrac{1}{2}|u|_{H^1_0}^2-int_Omegaint_0^{u(x)}f(s)operatorname{d}soperatorname{d}x.$$
If $G:Omegarightarrowmathbb{R}^n$, how can we treat the equation:
$$-Delta u=Gcdotnabla u+f(u),$$
or, more generally, if $g:mathbb{R}^ntomathbb{R}$, the equation:
$$-Delta u=gleft(nabla uright)+f(u)?$$
If $n=1$, I saw in the $G$-case that we can transform the equation into another semilinear elliptic equation that hasn't the dissipative term $u'$, with the same trick used in Sturm-Liouville theory, and so we can bring back this problem into the realm of the previous variational problem. However, what about the $g$-case if $n=1$? What about the $G$-case if $nge2$? Can we say anything about the $g$-case if $nge 2$?
pde calculus-of-variations variational-analysis
add a comment |
There are plenty of variational techniques (direct methods of calculus of variations, mountain pass type theorems, Lusternik-Schnirelmann theory) to prove the existence of solutions of a semilinear elliptic equation of the form $$-Delta u=f(u)$$
in the Sobolev space $H^1_0(Omega)$, where $Omega$ is a non-empty open subset of $mathbb{R}^n$,
under suitable hypothesis on $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$, thanks to the fact that we can see weak solutions of this problem as the stationary points of the functional:
$$I:H^1_0(Omega)tomathbb{R}, umapstofrac{1}{2}|u|_{H^1_0}^2-int_Omegaint_0^{u(x)}f(s)operatorname{d}soperatorname{d}x.$$
If $G:Omegarightarrowmathbb{R}^n$, how can we treat the equation:
$$-Delta u=Gcdotnabla u+f(u),$$
or, more generally, if $g:mathbb{R}^ntomathbb{R}$, the equation:
$$-Delta u=gleft(nabla uright)+f(u)?$$
If $n=1$, I saw in the $G$-case that we can transform the equation into another semilinear elliptic equation that hasn't the dissipative term $u'$, with the same trick used in Sturm-Liouville theory, and so we can bring back this problem into the realm of the previous variational problem. However, what about the $g$-case if $n=1$? What about the $G$-case if $nge2$? Can we say anything about the $g$-case if $nge 2$?
pde calculus-of-variations variational-analysis
add a comment |
There are plenty of variational techniques (direct methods of calculus of variations, mountain pass type theorems, Lusternik-Schnirelmann theory) to prove the existence of solutions of a semilinear elliptic equation of the form $$-Delta u=f(u)$$
in the Sobolev space $H^1_0(Omega)$, where $Omega$ is a non-empty open subset of $mathbb{R}^n$,
under suitable hypothesis on $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$, thanks to the fact that we can see weak solutions of this problem as the stationary points of the functional:
$$I:H^1_0(Omega)tomathbb{R}, umapstofrac{1}{2}|u|_{H^1_0}^2-int_Omegaint_0^{u(x)}f(s)operatorname{d}soperatorname{d}x.$$
If $G:Omegarightarrowmathbb{R}^n$, how can we treat the equation:
$$-Delta u=Gcdotnabla u+f(u),$$
or, more generally, if $g:mathbb{R}^ntomathbb{R}$, the equation:
$$-Delta u=gleft(nabla uright)+f(u)?$$
If $n=1$, I saw in the $G$-case that we can transform the equation into another semilinear elliptic equation that hasn't the dissipative term $u'$, with the same trick used in Sturm-Liouville theory, and so we can bring back this problem into the realm of the previous variational problem. However, what about the $g$-case if $n=1$? What about the $G$-case if $nge2$? Can we say anything about the $g$-case if $nge 2$?
pde calculus-of-variations variational-analysis
There are plenty of variational techniques (direct methods of calculus of variations, mountain pass type theorems, Lusternik-Schnirelmann theory) to prove the existence of solutions of a semilinear elliptic equation of the form $$-Delta u=f(u)$$
in the Sobolev space $H^1_0(Omega)$, where $Omega$ is a non-empty open subset of $mathbb{R}^n$,
under suitable hypothesis on $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb{R}$, thanks to the fact that we can see weak solutions of this problem as the stationary points of the functional:
$$I:H^1_0(Omega)tomathbb{R}, umapstofrac{1}{2}|u|_{H^1_0}^2-int_Omegaint_0^{u(x)}f(s)operatorname{d}soperatorname{d}x.$$
If $G:Omegarightarrowmathbb{R}^n$, how can we treat the equation:
$$-Delta u=Gcdotnabla u+f(u),$$
or, more generally, if $g:mathbb{R}^ntomathbb{R}$, the equation:
$$-Delta u=gleft(nabla uright)+f(u)?$$
If $n=1$, I saw in the $G$-case that we can transform the equation into another semilinear elliptic equation that hasn't the dissipative term $u'$, with the same trick used in Sturm-Liouville theory, and so we can bring back this problem into the realm of the previous variational problem. However, what about the $g$-case if $n=1$? What about the $G$-case if $nge2$? Can we say anything about the $g$-case if $nge 2$?
pde calculus-of-variations variational-analysis
pde calculus-of-variations variational-analysis
edited yesterday
asked Dec 27 '18 at 8:28
Bob
1,4451624
1,4451624
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053709%2fhow-to-treat-an-equation-of-the-form-delta-u-g-cdot-nabla-ufu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053709%2fhow-to-treat-an-equation-of-the-form-delta-u-g-cdot-nabla-ufu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown