Orbits of the conjugation action of $GL_3 (mathbb{R})$ on the nonsingular symmetric $3times3$-matrices












1












$begingroup$


Let $S$ be the space of all symmetric $3 times 3$ matrices of full rank and with real entries. $GL_3 (mathbb{R})$ acts on this space by conjugation,
begin{align*}
g.A = (g^{-1})^T A g^{-1}, quad g in GL_3 (mathbb{R}), quad A in S.
end{align*}

I have read (in the book in the references, p. 165) that if $det A > 0$ (EDIT: And if $A$ is indefinite), then the orbit of $A$ contains the matrix
begin{align*}
sigma_0 = left( begin{matrix}
0 & 0 & 1\
0 & -1 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 0
end{matrix} right),
end{align*}

but for some reason I am stuck trying to prove this.



My attempt:
If $lambda_1, lambda_2, lambda_3$ are the eigenvalues of $A$, then $Q^T hspace{-0.1cm} A Q = text{diag}(lambda_1, lambda_2, lambda_3)$ for some $Q in O(3)$. Given that $det A > 0$, either all of the eigenvalues are positive, or exactly two of them are negative. So if
begin{align*}
B = left( begin{matrix}
text{sign } lambda_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & text{sign } lambda_2 & 0 \
0 & 0 & text{sign } lambda_3
end{matrix} right),
end{align*}

we can write $C^T Q^T cdot A cdot Q C = B$ where $C$ is the diagonal matrix whose entries are $1/|lambda_i|$ for $i = 1,2,3$. From this point, I hoped to be able to apply some permutation matrices to conjugate $B$ to an anti-diagonal matrix and then finally conjugate by some other matrix to ensure that the signs of this anti-diagonal matrix match those of $sigma_0$.



Any ideas? Thank you.



References: Ergodic Theory and Topological Dynamics of Group Actions on Homogeneous Spaces by M. Bekka and M. Mayer










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are missing a hypothesis. If there is a nonzero real vector $v$ such that $v^T Av = 0,$ add in $det A > 0,$ then you get the result.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Jan 10 at 19:06










  • $begingroup$
    Right, we want $A$ to be indefinite. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Teddan the Terran
    Jan 11 at 8:59
















1












$begingroup$


Let $S$ be the space of all symmetric $3 times 3$ matrices of full rank and with real entries. $GL_3 (mathbb{R})$ acts on this space by conjugation,
begin{align*}
g.A = (g^{-1})^T A g^{-1}, quad g in GL_3 (mathbb{R}), quad A in S.
end{align*}

I have read (in the book in the references, p. 165) that if $det A > 0$ (EDIT: And if $A$ is indefinite), then the orbit of $A$ contains the matrix
begin{align*}
sigma_0 = left( begin{matrix}
0 & 0 & 1\
0 & -1 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 0
end{matrix} right),
end{align*}

but for some reason I am stuck trying to prove this.



My attempt:
If $lambda_1, lambda_2, lambda_3$ are the eigenvalues of $A$, then $Q^T hspace{-0.1cm} A Q = text{diag}(lambda_1, lambda_2, lambda_3)$ for some $Q in O(3)$. Given that $det A > 0$, either all of the eigenvalues are positive, or exactly two of them are negative. So if
begin{align*}
B = left( begin{matrix}
text{sign } lambda_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & text{sign } lambda_2 & 0 \
0 & 0 & text{sign } lambda_3
end{matrix} right),
end{align*}

we can write $C^T Q^T cdot A cdot Q C = B$ where $C$ is the diagonal matrix whose entries are $1/|lambda_i|$ for $i = 1,2,3$. From this point, I hoped to be able to apply some permutation matrices to conjugate $B$ to an anti-diagonal matrix and then finally conjugate by some other matrix to ensure that the signs of this anti-diagonal matrix match those of $sigma_0$.



Any ideas? Thank you.



References: Ergodic Theory and Topological Dynamics of Group Actions on Homogeneous Spaces by M. Bekka and M. Mayer










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are missing a hypothesis. If there is a nonzero real vector $v$ such that $v^T Av = 0,$ add in $det A > 0,$ then you get the result.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Jan 10 at 19:06










  • $begingroup$
    Right, we want $A$ to be indefinite. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Teddan the Terran
    Jan 11 at 8:59














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let $S$ be the space of all symmetric $3 times 3$ matrices of full rank and with real entries. $GL_3 (mathbb{R})$ acts on this space by conjugation,
begin{align*}
g.A = (g^{-1})^T A g^{-1}, quad g in GL_3 (mathbb{R}), quad A in S.
end{align*}

I have read (in the book in the references, p. 165) that if $det A > 0$ (EDIT: And if $A$ is indefinite), then the orbit of $A$ contains the matrix
begin{align*}
sigma_0 = left( begin{matrix}
0 & 0 & 1\
0 & -1 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 0
end{matrix} right),
end{align*}

but for some reason I am stuck trying to prove this.



My attempt:
If $lambda_1, lambda_2, lambda_3$ are the eigenvalues of $A$, then $Q^T hspace{-0.1cm} A Q = text{diag}(lambda_1, lambda_2, lambda_3)$ for some $Q in O(3)$. Given that $det A > 0$, either all of the eigenvalues are positive, or exactly two of them are negative. So if
begin{align*}
B = left( begin{matrix}
text{sign } lambda_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & text{sign } lambda_2 & 0 \
0 & 0 & text{sign } lambda_3
end{matrix} right),
end{align*}

we can write $C^T Q^T cdot A cdot Q C = B$ where $C$ is the diagonal matrix whose entries are $1/|lambda_i|$ for $i = 1,2,3$. From this point, I hoped to be able to apply some permutation matrices to conjugate $B$ to an anti-diagonal matrix and then finally conjugate by some other matrix to ensure that the signs of this anti-diagonal matrix match those of $sigma_0$.



Any ideas? Thank you.



References: Ergodic Theory and Topological Dynamics of Group Actions on Homogeneous Spaces by M. Bekka and M. Mayer










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $S$ be the space of all symmetric $3 times 3$ matrices of full rank and with real entries. $GL_3 (mathbb{R})$ acts on this space by conjugation,
begin{align*}
g.A = (g^{-1})^T A g^{-1}, quad g in GL_3 (mathbb{R}), quad A in S.
end{align*}

I have read (in the book in the references, p. 165) that if $det A > 0$ (EDIT: And if $A$ is indefinite), then the orbit of $A$ contains the matrix
begin{align*}
sigma_0 = left( begin{matrix}
0 & 0 & 1\
0 & -1 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 0
end{matrix} right),
end{align*}

but for some reason I am stuck trying to prove this.



My attempt:
If $lambda_1, lambda_2, lambda_3$ are the eigenvalues of $A$, then $Q^T hspace{-0.1cm} A Q = text{diag}(lambda_1, lambda_2, lambda_3)$ for some $Q in O(3)$. Given that $det A > 0$, either all of the eigenvalues are positive, or exactly two of them are negative. So if
begin{align*}
B = left( begin{matrix}
text{sign } lambda_1 & 0 & 0\
0 & text{sign } lambda_2 & 0 \
0 & 0 & text{sign } lambda_3
end{matrix} right),
end{align*}

we can write $C^T Q^T cdot A cdot Q C = B$ where $C$ is the diagonal matrix whose entries are $1/|lambda_i|$ for $i = 1,2,3$. From this point, I hoped to be able to apply some permutation matrices to conjugate $B$ to an anti-diagonal matrix and then finally conjugate by some other matrix to ensure that the signs of this anti-diagonal matrix match those of $sigma_0$.



Any ideas? Thank you.



References: Ergodic Theory and Topological Dynamics of Group Actions on Homogeneous Spaces by M. Bekka and M. Mayer







matrices group-actions quadratic-forms symmetric-matrices






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 11 at 11:59







Teddan the Terran

















asked Jan 10 at 16:59









Teddan the TerranTeddan the Terran

1,206210




1,206210








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are missing a hypothesis. If there is a nonzero real vector $v$ such that $v^T Av = 0,$ add in $det A > 0,$ then you get the result.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Jan 10 at 19:06










  • $begingroup$
    Right, we want $A$ to be indefinite. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Teddan the Terran
    Jan 11 at 8:59














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are missing a hypothesis. If there is a nonzero real vector $v$ such that $v^T Av = 0,$ add in $det A > 0,$ then you get the result.
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Jan 10 at 19:06










  • $begingroup$
    Right, we want $A$ to be indefinite. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – Teddan the Terran
    Jan 11 at 8:59








1




1




$begingroup$
You are missing a hypothesis. If there is a nonzero real vector $v$ such that $v^T Av = 0,$ add in $det A > 0,$ then you get the result.
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 10 at 19:06




$begingroup$
You are missing a hypothesis. If there is a nonzero real vector $v$ such that $v^T Av = 0,$ add in $det A > 0,$ then you get the result.
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 10 at 19:06












$begingroup$
Right, we want $A$ to be indefinite. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Teddan the Terran
Jan 11 at 8:59




$begingroup$
Right, we want $A$ to be indefinite. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– Teddan the Terran
Jan 11 at 8:59










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

That certainly is false. The action in question is a matrix congruence. By Sylvester's law of inertia, the inertia of a matrix is an invariant under congruence. This means every matrix in the orbit containing $sigma_0$ must have the same inertia as $sigma_0$, i.e. it must have one positive eigenvalues and two negative eigenvalues. Clearly, this is not always the case if you only require that $det(A)>0$, because $A$ may have three positive eigenvalues.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, you are absolutely right. As Will Jagy also pointed out, the claim in the book also relies on $A$ being indefinite. I just edited the question to emphasize this.
    $endgroup$
    – Teddan the Terran
    Jan 11 at 12:01











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068911%2forbits-of-the-conjugation-action-of-gl-3-mathbbr-on-the-nonsingular-symme%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

That certainly is false. The action in question is a matrix congruence. By Sylvester's law of inertia, the inertia of a matrix is an invariant under congruence. This means every matrix in the orbit containing $sigma_0$ must have the same inertia as $sigma_0$, i.e. it must have one positive eigenvalues and two negative eigenvalues. Clearly, this is not always the case if you only require that $det(A)>0$, because $A$ may have three positive eigenvalues.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, you are absolutely right. As Will Jagy also pointed out, the claim in the book also relies on $A$ being indefinite. I just edited the question to emphasize this.
    $endgroup$
    – Teddan the Terran
    Jan 11 at 12:01
















1












$begingroup$

That certainly is false. The action in question is a matrix congruence. By Sylvester's law of inertia, the inertia of a matrix is an invariant under congruence. This means every matrix in the orbit containing $sigma_0$ must have the same inertia as $sigma_0$, i.e. it must have one positive eigenvalues and two negative eigenvalues. Clearly, this is not always the case if you only require that $det(A)>0$, because $A$ may have three positive eigenvalues.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, you are absolutely right. As Will Jagy also pointed out, the claim in the book also relies on $A$ being indefinite. I just edited the question to emphasize this.
    $endgroup$
    – Teddan the Terran
    Jan 11 at 12:01














1












1








1





$begingroup$

That certainly is false. The action in question is a matrix congruence. By Sylvester's law of inertia, the inertia of a matrix is an invariant under congruence. This means every matrix in the orbit containing $sigma_0$ must have the same inertia as $sigma_0$, i.e. it must have one positive eigenvalues and two negative eigenvalues. Clearly, this is not always the case if you only require that $det(A)>0$, because $A$ may have three positive eigenvalues.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



That certainly is false. The action in question is a matrix congruence. By Sylvester's law of inertia, the inertia of a matrix is an invariant under congruence. This means every matrix in the orbit containing $sigma_0$ must have the same inertia as $sigma_0$, i.e. it must have one positive eigenvalues and two negative eigenvalues. Clearly, this is not always the case if you only require that $det(A)>0$, because $A$ may have three positive eigenvalues.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 11 at 11:45









user1551user1551

73.4k566128




73.4k566128












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, you are absolutely right. As Will Jagy also pointed out, the claim in the book also relies on $A$ being indefinite. I just edited the question to emphasize this.
    $endgroup$
    – Teddan the Terran
    Jan 11 at 12:01


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, you are absolutely right. As Will Jagy also pointed out, the claim in the book also relies on $A$ being indefinite. I just edited the question to emphasize this.
    $endgroup$
    – Teddan the Terran
    Jan 11 at 12:01
















$begingroup$
Thank you, you are absolutely right. As Will Jagy also pointed out, the claim in the book also relies on $A$ being indefinite. I just edited the question to emphasize this.
$endgroup$
– Teddan the Terran
Jan 11 at 12:01




$begingroup$
Thank you, you are absolutely right. As Will Jagy also pointed out, the claim in the book also relies on $A$ being indefinite. I just edited the question to emphasize this.
$endgroup$
– Teddan the Terran
Jan 11 at 12:01


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068911%2forbits-of-the-conjugation-action-of-gl-3-mathbbr-on-the-nonsingular-symme%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg