Is there anything in the rules giving Loxodons disadvantage on Stealth checks?












8












$begingroup$


I'm curious if there is a ruling on this topic. Specifically the debate was over whether a Loxodon Way of the Shadow Monk could benefit from the massive stealth advantages and ninja-teleportation. This would apply equally I presume for Centaurs and other larger (but still medium) playable races.



Speaking of "flavor" it seems a Loxodon/Centaur ninja would be highly ineffective. A 7ft tall 400lb elephant probably wouldn't make a great ninja, right? It makes sense from a world concept level.



But is there actually anything in the rules that would give these large (but still Medium-sized) creatures disadvantage on Stealth checks?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Tigers are up to 12 feet and weigh 800lb and they have massive stealth advantages
    $endgroup$
    – Dale M
    Feb 7 at 11:36






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    If you've never seen a Loxodon Ninja, is it because they are really good at stealth?
    $endgroup$
    – Caleth
    Feb 7 at 11:45
















8












$begingroup$


I'm curious if there is a ruling on this topic. Specifically the debate was over whether a Loxodon Way of the Shadow Monk could benefit from the massive stealth advantages and ninja-teleportation. This would apply equally I presume for Centaurs and other larger (but still medium) playable races.



Speaking of "flavor" it seems a Loxodon/Centaur ninja would be highly ineffective. A 7ft tall 400lb elephant probably wouldn't make a great ninja, right? It makes sense from a world concept level.



But is there actually anything in the rules that would give these large (but still Medium-sized) creatures disadvantage on Stealth checks?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Tigers are up to 12 feet and weigh 800lb and they have massive stealth advantages
    $endgroup$
    – Dale M
    Feb 7 at 11:36






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    If you've never seen a Loxodon Ninja, is it because they are really good at stealth?
    $endgroup$
    – Caleth
    Feb 7 at 11:45














8












8








8





$begingroup$


I'm curious if there is a ruling on this topic. Specifically the debate was over whether a Loxodon Way of the Shadow Monk could benefit from the massive stealth advantages and ninja-teleportation. This would apply equally I presume for Centaurs and other larger (but still medium) playable races.



Speaking of "flavor" it seems a Loxodon/Centaur ninja would be highly ineffective. A 7ft tall 400lb elephant probably wouldn't make a great ninja, right? It makes sense from a world concept level.



But is there actually anything in the rules that would give these large (but still Medium-sized) creatures disadvantage on Stealth checks?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm curious if there is a ruling on this topic. Specifically the debate was over whether a Loxodon Way of the Shadow Monk could benefit from the massive stealth advantages and ninja-teleportation. This would apply equally I presume for Centaurs and other larger (but still medium) playable races.



Speaking of "flavor" it seems a Loxodon/Centaur ninja would be highly ineffective. A 7ft tall 400lb elephant probably wouldn't make a great ninja, right? It makes sense from a world concept level.



But is there actually anything in the rules that would give these large (but still Medium-sized) creatures disadvantage on Stealth checks?







dnd-5e races stealth ravnica






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 7 at 4:55









V2Blast

26k588158




26k588158










asked Feb 7 at 4:49









Nick TydryszewskiNick Tydryszewski

5068




5068








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Tigers are up to 12 feet and weigh 800lb and they have massive stealth advantages
    $endgroup$
    – Dale M
    Feb 7 at 11:36






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    If you've never seen a Loxodon Ninja, is it because they are really good at stealth?
    $endgroup$
    – Caleth
    Feb 7 at 11:45














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Tigers are up to 12 feet and weigh 800lb and they have massive stealth advantages
    $endgroup$
    – Dale M
    Feb 7 at 11:36






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    If you've never seen a Loxodon Ninja, is it because they are really good at stealth?
    $endgroup$
    – Caleth
    Feb 7 at 11:45








1




1




$begingroup$
Tigers are up to 12 feet and weigh 800lb and they have massive stealth advantages
$endgroup$
– Dale M
Feb 7 at 11:36




$begingroup$
Tigers are up to 12 feet and weigh 800lb and they have massive stealth advantages
$endgroup$
– Dale M
Feb 7 at 11:36




5




5




$begingroup$
If you've never seen a Loxodon Ninja, is it because they are really good at stealth?
$endgroup$
– Caleth
Feb 7 at 11:45




$begingroup$
If you've never seen a Loxodon Ninja, is it because they are really good at stealth?
$endgroup$
– Caleth
Feb 7 at 11:45










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















13












$begingroup$

There are no hard rules associating a creature's size with their ability to sneak in this way. Mechanically, the Loxodon is as capable of learning the art of stealth as any race.



The fifth edition of DnD does allow for a way for GM to introduce "common sense" elements into difficulty: advantage and disadvantage. Having one's ankles chained together would be a good example of a reason why a GM'd give disadvantage.



However, introducing a permanent disadvantage for a skill the character uses a lot --- stealth in this case --- is in bad taste if the player was not aware of the penalty in advance. How you want to apply this kind of realism in the table is your choice as a group, so talk with your players if you have a problem with it.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    6












    $begingroup$

    No, but they won't be able to hide as often.



    There is nothing giving loxodon or centaur players a straight disadvantage at stealth check. Actually, size doesn't even affect Dexterity(Stealth) ability checks at all. When rolling to hide, a Gargantuan Gold Dragon has better chances than a Tiny Cat.



    It does not mean that they have the same chances to crawl unnoticed behind your sofa, though ; this is covered by the "hiding" rules :




    HIDING



    The DM decides when circumstances are appropriate for hiding.




    Obviously, a loxodon or centaur will have much more trouble finding an appropriate hiding spot than, say, a human or a dwarf. The DM may use disadvantage at stealth, or advantage at perception, to solve this kind of situation - but he also may decide you can't hide at all.



    On the other hand... It may be worth it - as once you hit level 11 and can turn invisible in shadows... There's much fun to be had. I guess the look on your opponent's face, when you reveal yourself, should be priceless.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Exactly this. To hide, you have to have a hiding spot.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark Wells
      Feb 7 at 14:59












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140592%2fis-there-anything-in-the-rules-giving-loxodons-disadvantage-on-stealth-checks%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    13












    $begingroup$

    There are no hard rules associating a creature's size with their ability to sneak in this way. Mechanically, the Loxodon is as capable of learning the art of stealth as any race.



    The fifth edition of DnD does allow for a way for GM to introduce "common sense" elements into difficulty: advantage and disadvantage. Having one's ankles chained together would be a good example of a reason why a GM'd give disadvantage.



    However, introducing a permanent disadvantage for a skill the character uses a lot --- stealth in this case --- is in bad taste if the player was not aware of the penalty in advance. How you want to apply this kind of realism in the table is your choice as a group, so talk with your players if you have a problem with it.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      13












      $begingroup$

      There are no hard rules associating a creature's size with their ability to sneak in this way. Mechanically, the Loxodon is as capable of learning the art of stealth as any race.



      The fifth edition of DnD does allow for a way for GM to introduce "common sense" elements into difficulty: advantage and disadvantage. Having one's ankles chained together would be a good example of a reason why a GM'd give disadvantage.



      However, introducing a permanent disadvantage for a skill the character uses a lot --- stealth in this case --- is in bad taste if the player was not aware of the penalty in advance. How you want to apply this kind of realism in the table is your choice as a group, so talk with your players if you have a problem with it.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        13












        13








        13





        $begingroup$

        There are no hard rules associating a creature's size with their ability to sneak in this way. Mechanically, the Loxodon is as capable of learning the art of stealth as any race.



        The fifth edition of DnD does allow for a way for GM to introduce "common sense" elements into difficulty: advantage and disadvantage. Having one's ankles chained together would be a good example of a reason why a GM'd give disadvantage.



        However, introducing a permanent disadvantage for a skill the character uses a lot --- stealth in this case --- is in bad taste if the player was not aware of the penalty in advance. How you want to apply this kind of realism in the table is your choice as a group, so talk with your players if you have a problem with it.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        There are no hard rules associating a creature's size with their ability to sneak in this way. Mechanically, the Loxodon is as capable of learning the art of stealth as any race.



        The fifth edition of DnD does allow for a way for GM to introduce "common sense" elements into difficulty: advantage and disadvantage. Having one's ankles chained together would be a good example of a reason why a GM'd give disadvantage.



        However, introducing a permanent disadvantage for a skill the character uses a lot --- stealth in this case --- is in bad taste if the player was not aware of the penalty in advance. How you want to apply this kind of realism in the table is your choice as a group, so talk with your players if you have a problem with it.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Feb 7 at 5:23









        kviirikviiri

        37.9k13140215




        37.9k13140215

























            6












            $begingroup$

            No, but they won't be able to hide as often.



            There is nothing giving loxodon or centaur players a straight disadvantage at stealth check. Actually, size doesn't even affect Dexterity(Stealth) ability checks at all. When rolling to hide, a Gargantuan Gold Dragon has better chances than a Tiny Cat.



            It does not mean that they have the same chances to crawl unnoticed behind your sofa, though ; this is covered by the "hiding" rules :




            HIDING



            The DM decides when circumstances are appropriate for hiding.




            Obviously, a loxodon or centaur will have much more trouble finding an appropriate hiding spot than, say, a human or a dwarf. The DM may use disadvantage at stealth, or advantage at perception, to solve this kind of situation - but he also may decide you can't hide at all.



            On the other hand... It may be worth it - as once you hit level 11 and can turn invisible in shadows... There's much fun to be had. I guess the look on your opponent's face, when you reveal yourself, should be priceless.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Exactly this. To hide, you have to have a hiding spot.
              $endgroup$
              – Mark Wells
              Feb 7 at 14:59
















            6












            $begingroup$

            No, but they won't be able to hide as often.



            There is nothing giving loxodon or centaur players a straight disadvantage at stealth check. Actually, size doesn't even affect Dexterity(Stealth) ability checks at all. When rolling to hide, a Gargantuan Gold Dragon has better chances than a Tiny Cat.



            It does not mean that they have the same chances to crawl unnoticed behind your sofa, though ; this is covered by the "hiding" rules :




            HIDING



            The DM decides when circumstances are appropriate for hiding.




            Obviously, a loxodon or centaur will have much more trouble finding an appropriate hiding spot than, say, a human or a dwarf. The DM may use disadvantage at stealth, or advantage at perception, to solve this kind of situation - but he also may decide you can't hide at all.



            On the other hand... It may be worth it - as once you hit level 11 and can turn invisible in shadows... There's much fun to be had. I guess the look on your opponent's face, when you reveal yourself, should be priceless.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Exactly this. To hide, you have to have a hiding spot.
              $endgroup$
              – Mark Wells
              Feb 7 at 14:59














            6












            6








            6





            $begingroup$

            No, but they won't be able to hide as often.



            There is nothing giving loxodon or centaur players a straight disadvantage at stealth check. Actually, size doesn't even affect Dexterity(Stealth) ability checks at all. When rolling to hide, a Gargantuan Gold Dragon has better chances than a Tiny Cat.



            It does not mean that they have the same chances to crawl unnoticed behind your sofa, though ; this is covered by the "hiding" rules :




            HIDING



            The DM decides when circumstances are appropriate for hiding.




            Obviously, a loxodon or centaur will have much more trouble finding an appropriate hiding spot than, say, a human or a dwarf. The DM may use disadvantage at stealth, or advantage at perception, to solve this kind of situation - but he also may decide you can't hide at all.



            On the other hand... It may be worth it - as once you hit level 11 and can turn invisible in shadows... There's much fun to be had. I guess the look on your opponent's face, when you reveal yourself, should be priceless.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            No, but they won't be able to hide as often.



            There is nothing giving loxodon or centaur players a straight disadvantage at stealth check. Actually, size doesn't even affect Dexterity(Stealth) ability checks at all. When rolling to hide, a Gargantuan Gold Dragon has better chances than a Tiny Cat.



            It does not mean that they have the same chances to crawl unnoticed behind your sofa, though ; this is covered by the "hiding" rules :




            HIDING



            The DM decides when circumstances are appropriate for hiding.




            Obviously, a loxodon or centaur will have much more trouble finding an appropriate hiding spot than, say, a human or a dwarf. The DM may use disadvantage at stealth, or advantage at perception, to solve this kind of situation - but he also may decide you can't hide at all.



            On the other hand... It may be worth it - as once you hit level 11 and can turn invisible in shadows... There's much fun to be had. I guess the look on your opponent's face, when you reveal yourself, should be priceless.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Feb 7 at 11:16









            BashBash

            1,557222




            1,557222












            • $begingroup$
              Exactly this. To hide, you have to have a hiding spot.
              $endgroup$
              – Mark Wells
              Feb 7 at 14:59


















            • $begingroup$
              Exactly this. To hide, you have to have a hiding spot.
              $endgroup$
              – Mark Wells
              Feb 7 at 14:59
















            $begingroup$
            Exactly this. To hide, you have to have a hiding spot.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Wells
            Feb 7 at 14:59




            $begingroup$
            Exactly this. To hide, you have to have a hiding spot.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Wells
            Feb 7 at 14:59


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140592%2fis-there-anything-in-the-rules-giving-loxodons-disadvantage-on-stealth-checks%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            張江高科駅